When facts are arranged to tell a story, the story often replaces the truth.
On Monday, March 23, 2026, the New York Times ran a story that illustrates in miniature everything that has gone wrong with modern legacy media: “Born Abroad and Fearful of ICE, Adoptees Try to Prove They Belong.” The article highlights individuals adopted as children from overseas who, due to gaps in U.S. immigration law prior to 2000, never formally obtained citizenship. It presents their anxiety about potential deportation and their efforts to regularize their status.
At first glance, this looks like standard human-interest reporting. It is not. It is advocacy dressed up as journalism—argument smuggled in under the cover of anecdote. The underlying facts are real, but the framing is not merely selective; it is misleading. By emphasizing fear, inflating scale, and implying active government pursuit, the article constructs a narrative that bears only a loose relationship to the actual risk faced by most people in this category. This is not an isolated lapse. It is a method.











It was seven years ago today, in the midst of a rather difficult time in my life, that a young ginger-and-white cat strode into it.
I discovered something that I’m rather shocked doesn’t get brought up more. I can’t be the first person to discover this, but then again many people don’t bother to read primary texts. Still, this point is so large and causes such disruption in the religious-political environment that a discussion cannot be avoided. So I want to highlight this rather provocative topic.