When Framing Becomes Distortion: Why Trust in Legacy Media Keeps Falling

151295
 

When facts are arranged to tell a story, the story often replaces the truth.

On Monday, March 23, 2026, the New York Times ran a story that illustrates in miniature everything that has gone wrong with modern legacy media: “Born Abroad and Fearful of ICE, Adoptees Try to Prove They Belong.” The article highlights individuals adopted as children from overseas who, due to gaps in U.S. immigration law prior to 2000, never formally obtained citizenship. It presents their anxiety about potential deportation and their efforts to regularize their status.

At first glance, this looks like standard human-interest reporting. It is not. It is advocacy dressed up as journalism—argument smuggled in under the cover of anecdote. The underlying facts are real, but the framing is not merely selective; it is misleading. By emphasizing fear, inflating scale, and implying active government pursuit, the article constructs a narrative that bears only a loose relationship to the actual risk faced by most people in this category. This is not an isolated lapse. It is a method.

Justice Barrett joins Ben and Chris. Ben shares his status as the founding member of the ACB for SCOTUS club. The three talk about how she writes her opinions, how parenting slows down the train, the importance of civics, and what horse-race political journalism gets wrong about the Supreme Court.

Bethany is joined this week by the Free Press’s Kat Rosenfield to talk about the situation in young adult publishing and the polyamarous craze, and her column on Lindy West.

A rather interesting case of mistaken identity: Stryker cyber-attack

119
 

A couple of weeks ago, I came across an interesting story on X, about medical-device manufacturer Stryker (full disclosure: I am a Stryker shareholder).  It seems that an Iranian hacking group, in response to the US and Israeli attacks on its military and nuclear infrastructure, took down extensive Stryker internal systems, which essentially ran all its internal operations.  The attack wiped thousands of individual devices throughout the international company, here and around the world.  The article here describes the attack very well (Stryker has an outpost in the Seattle area).

I would like to take credit for recognizing the actual mistaken identity issue, but it was really Ray who did.  As a maker of medical devices, Stryker has and had absolutely nothing to do with the war on Iran.  But Ray pointed out to me that there is a connection, and that would be the Stryker military vehicle, which is manufactured by General Dynamics, another company in which I own shares.  Here is one.

They’re Ba-a-ack!

2010136
 

Some of you might remember that I wrote a post last spring about two nesting sandhill cranes. We were thrilled to have the birds across the pond from our house, and watched their process for minding the egg, sharing shifts, and taking breaks.

We weren’t sure they would return this year because the nest was flooded when the pond water elevated from the rains.

Hospitals & Their Fake Prices

1711354
 

Hospital prices are out of control. We know this.

A patient recently posted a bill showing a hospital charge of $17,813 for an MRI. Her insurance absorbed most of it, but she was still left owing about $2,600 herself. This is not some isolated curiosity. In the recent House Energy and Commerce hearing on health care affordability, Rick Pollack of the American Hospital Association defended hospital finances by arguing that “Medicare and Medicaid payments generally do not cover the full cost of providing care.”

USS Titanic?

3614304
 

My thought of the morning as I doom scroll centered on how resilient America is and whether the progressive project has succeeded in dooming the American Experiment.

The famed HMS Titanic was billed as unsinkable, and yet it sank. Its design involved sixteen watertight compartments in the hull divided by fifteen transverse bulkheads. As many as four compartments could be breached while the ship could remain afloat. Six compartments were breached, and the ship went down.

Diversity Conventional Wisdom

1511
 

Image

In the most recent election cycle, three incumbent black judges in San Antonio lost their primaries, as did the other two first-time black candidates. In this article in the San Antonio Express-News, the following quote appears:

“I think it’s a very bad look for the criminal justice system not to have any African American judges,” said attorney Andrew Birrell, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys. “The bench ought to reflect A, the society, and B, the people who come before the court. That’s how you get the fairest result that people are the most accepting of.”

Battle in Southern European Skies

2583
 

ImageThe “Forgotten Fifteenth,” the XV Air Force, fought in the Mediterranean Theater. It was the European Theater’s southern counterpart to the more glamorous VIII Air Force. Its contribution to the European air war was largely forgotten. Thomas McKelvey Cleaver is rectifying that.

Bloody Skies: XV Fighter Command Against all Odds tells the history of the XV Air Force. Its focus is the XV Fighter Command, following the XV from its formation in the fall of 1943 through the end of the war in Europe.

Cleaver includes a study of the XV Air Force’s two-year campaign against the Ploesti oil fields and refineries in Romania. This was Nazi Germany’s most important source of petroleum products. Cleaver describes the campaign starting with the famous Black Sunday low-level mission in August 1943 through its successful completion in late 1944.

The Question I’ve Never Heard Tucker Carlson Ask…

4817
 

File:Satan summoning his Legions, 1796-1797 by Sir Thomas Lawrence.jpgI listened to Tucker’s interview, several days ago, on a podcast–I think it was Megyn Kelly’s podcast.  Along the way, Tucker made one outrageous claim after another.  And yet he also, when it came to Israel, was repeatedly at pains to point out that he–who insists that he isn’t an anti-Semite–“understands” Israel’s position vis-a-vis Iran and the rest of the Middle East, and that he realizes that the Israeli position is merely one of wanting supremacy in relation to its regional neighbors. Something, Tucker repeatedly said, that every nation-state wants. And he repeated, time after time, an assertion that he, “Tucker,” understands Netanyahu’s position, and said that had he (Tucker) been in charge of the messaging, he’d have said exactly the same as has Bibi.

Megyn, as I’ve increasingly come to expect, nodded along.

And I started to wonder:  What is it that Tucker Carlson thinks is Iran’s goal in the Middle East?  And why do I never see him speaking to it?  Why doesn’t he ever seem to state that it’s perfectly understandable and defensible to execute thousands of Iran’s citizens, if they’re standing in the way of the regime’s national and religious objectives, and why isn’t he asserting that he–Tucker–would be doing exactly what the mullahs and the IRGC are doing to promote it, were he in charge of Iranian messaging along the way?

The Observatory: Lazy Edition

2010
 

I have been wondering if being lazy is embedded in DNA. When I think back to my childhood, I remember my mother making strong note of my laziness. Once, when I was probably four or five years old, we put up our stockings for St. Nick (we did not put out our shoes), along with treats. I got a hanger because I was not in the habit of hanging up my clothes. So this could not really be a nature/nurture thing.

If there was anything my parents were not, it was lazy. Even when we went on vacation, we did not go somewhere to laze around on a beach. My dad drove to specific places so we could see specific things. He stopped at every roadside historical marker (probably just to ‘stretch his legs’), and if possible, drove by any state capitol that happened into our path. We decided the capitol in Bismarck, North Dakota, was not to our liking.

Islamic Supremacy Is In Peril

1110273
 

Nazism did not fail because the ideology was proven false by intellectual elites, defeated by a superior logical argument. The argument for Nazism was always about power: racial superiority equals military superiority.  When Germany fell, those who supported the Nazi movement all suffered amnesia. “Not me!” they said. “It was the Nazis!”

Islamic Supremacy, the violent Iran-backed vanguard of the new Caliphate, is on the brink of the very same collapse. Iran was built on the idea that Allah, the All-Powerful, made His Faithful all-powerful as well.

This week we raise the Jolly Roger against an imitator podcast that is intruding on the 3WHH’s exclusive right of commentary on all things McDonald’s, but then we move on to our own balance sheet about the Iran War (verdict—we’re winning big, and Trump is killing it), and the saga of the SAVE Act in the Senate, where opinion divides more sharply among the three of us.

Here we land the blame squarely on GOP Senate leader John Thune, and did you know that “thune” is a slang French expression for for money, though it is often used with a modifier to indicate the lack thereof, like “sans thune.” Seems fitting for a GOP Senate that can’t figure out how to fight.

The Birth of Freedom: March 20, 1854, and the Republican Party’s Triumph Over Slavery

118146
 

On March 20, 1854, in the modest wooden frame of Ripon, Wisconsin’s Little White Schoolhouse, history took a decisive turn. A small gathering of about 50 ordinary Americans—disillusioned Whigs, Free Soilers, and even a few Democrats—met not in grand halls of power but in a humble one-room schoolhouse. Alarmed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which threatened to repeal the Missouri Compromise, opening vast western territories to the expansion of slavery, they resolved to dissolve old party lines and forge a new political organization. They called it the Republican Party. That meeting did not merely launch a political entity; it lit the fuse that would explode the institution of human bondage in America. March 20, 1854, stands as the day the United States began its irreversible march toward emancipation—the true beginning of the end of slavery.

To understand the gravity of that moment, consider its parallels with other epochal turning points. Just as July 4, 1776, marked the Declaration of Independence and the beginning of America’s break from British tyranny, March 20 signaled the republic’s moral declaration against the tyranny of slavery. The signers in Philadelphia pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to liberty; the citizens in Ripon pledged a new party to the principle that “all men are created equal” meant exactly that—no man could own another. Similarly, the D-Day invasion of June 6, 1944, did not end World War II on the spot. It launched the Allied armies onto the beaches of Normandy and made Nazi Germany’s defeat inevitable. In the same way, the Republican Party’s birth in Ripon did not free a single slave but set in motion forces that would crush the Confederacy, shatter the chains of four million Americans, and rewrite the Constitution itself. From that schoolhouse sprang the political will that would elect Abraham Lincoln, prosecute the Civil War to victory, issue the Emancipation Proclamation, and ram the Thirteenth Amendment through Congress.

Ann’s Five Stories of the Week:

  • Projecting Trump into the future
  • The Spectator declares “The End of Trumpism”
  • End the TSA!
  • Fox News gets its talking points
  • Record number of migrant deaths in Europe

Richard Epstein takes aim at NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s push for rent control and higher inheritance taxes, arguing that both policies punish landlords, shrink housing supply, and ultimately drive wealth—and people—out of the state. From empty apartments and collapsing incentives to interstate tax competition and capital flight, Epstein lays out a stark warning: policies that sound compassionate in the short run can devastate cities over time. A sharp, unsparing look at markets, incentives, and the high cost of getting them wrong.

Iran Action. Why Now?

2512
 

If it hasn’t already been plainly stated, I thought I would put my finger directly on it now. It’s a question I believe many have. I believe it has also caused a certain consternation, even for people on the right. I’m referring to the joint US-Israel military action against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Yes, I do consider it a war — a pretty good word for when your military blows up the high brass of another country. I’m not so much into the euphemisms that get used a lot now. I’ll also plainly state that I don’t think many anticipated this type of war prior to Trump being re-elected or even during much of the last year. Though during the 12-Day War, I think there was a contingent that thought it a mistake to fall short of attacking the Islamic Regime directly in terms of holding power toward the end.

So, why now?

Our Role

16916
 

I would like to propose that we all acknowledge that American military leadership is not stupid, and that Israeli military leadership is also not stupid. We should all agree they would not undertake any mission without a plan. This should not be a difficult debate. The military does not undertake the mission of going to lunch without 3 contingency plans.

The military leadership knew better than anyone that history is without an example of a regime being brought down solely by air power. They duly informed political leadership of this historical fact, and political leadership instructed them to do the best they could.

H.R. McMaster joins Steve and Charles to take stock of the war in the Middle East. Though a tank man by training, H.R. is no stranger to thinking about our capabilities and how they stack up against our foes—both the enemy in Iran and the aggressors backing them up.

Plus, Cooke and Hayward can’t help but feel a bit of relief that there’s a bit less Ehrlichian misanthropy in the world; consider newly reported accusations against Caesar Chavez that could prove fatal to the progressive hero’s reputation; and they round the necrologies out with a salute to the immortal Chuck Norris.

John Yoo, Richard Epstein, and Charles C.W. Cooke dive into the legal firestorm surrounding U.S. actions in Iran—debating “imminence,” anticipatory self-defense, and whether international law has any real teeth. Then, they tackle a major 2nd Amendment case testing whether drug use can justify a permanent gun ban—and whether courts or legislatures should draw that line. Finally, a heated clash over parental rights, the Constitution, and California’s school policies raises a deeper question: where do these rights actually come from?

Psymon

147
 

ImageIt was seven years ago today, in the midst of a rather difficult time in my life, that a young ginger-and-white cat strode into it.

I’d seen him, over the past several months, in the cold and in the snow, down in the field.  He and another cat, this one black.  The ginger-and-white would occasionally show up on my brick patio for the food I put out for them.  The black one, not so much, and–try as I might–I was never able to round him up.

But, on March 19, 2019, the ginger and white guy decided he’d found a new home.  And on that morning, I opened the door to go outdoors, and he strode inside as if he owned the place.  I wrote, not quite a year later:

The Koran supports Zionism. Surprise!!!

95
 

ImageI discovered something that I’m rather shocked doesn’t get brought up more. I can’t be the first person to discover this, but then again many people don’t bother to read primary texts. Still, this point is so large and causes such disruption in the religious-political environment that a discussion cannot be avoided. So I want to highlight this rather provocative topic.

I was going through my personal copy of the Koran (aka Quran or Qu’ran), Islam’s highest scripture, for research purposes on doing a different, upcoming post but I discovered something else that I’m rather shocked doesn’t get brought up more. That “something” is the fact that the Koran, in rather direct terms, endorses Zionism. This claim I make might sound outrageous, given, well, all that you know. I will cite the Koran to provide documentation.

But before I get into the Koranic scripture, I need to be clear about what I mean by “Zionism” since this is a very loaded and thrown-about term. Here I mean Zionism to mean the plain-Jane historical definition, which simply means the establishment of a Jewish Nation State – typically thought to be within the geographical region of the Levant. This concept of a “Promised Land” has roots in the Mosaic books that are part of both the Christian Bible and Jewish Torah. What is fascinating is that the Koran borrows many stories and characters from the Bible but arranges them into a jumbled mess. Whoever compiled the Koran may not have really understood the texts being put together, and it resulted in a rather hard-to-follow and, at times, incoherent religion when taken as a whole. I think scholars of Islam understand this and have to sweep the dirty evidence under the prayer carpet. Instead of reading for comprehension of the Koran, the Imams seem to prefer reciting it in a mindless repetition. The Koran itself doesn’t really supply the means of a religion just by itself, so that’s probably why all the other stuff was added (I write about this in another post).