You Atheists say that you don’t believe in God because there’s no good evidence. What would you consider to be a good reason to believe?
The correct answer is, God knows, in both senses!
I don’t believe in ‘God’, because I don’t understand what God is, or what it means to even say that a God exists. So, what I’m looking for is not only good reasons to believe that a god exists, but, first and foremost, a definition of a god, and an explanation of what it means to say that one exists, that I can recognize as coherent.
The more smart-ass Christian Apologists like to add the gotcha phrase – in the possibility of the existence of God. To an honest interlocutor, I will admit that there is no way to prove 100% positively, that “God” does not exist, but these desperate Liars For Christ will seize upon that tiny, slim chance, and shout, “There, you see? You really DO believe in God – at least a little bit!” when I really don’t. If I get angry or frustrated with their silly claims and say “My God,” or “God damn,” they jump right back with, “See, you said My God, so that proves that you really do believe in Him.” completely missing the point that, even if I believed in A god – MY god – I still wouldn’t believe in their God. If you don’t believe in God, who do you give thanks to on Thanksgiving? “Thank” is an intransitive verb. It does not require an object, certainly not “God.’
While such debaters think that they have posed a really smart question, it is in fact, quite silly and stupid. If Atheists knew of a good reason to believe in God – THEY WOULD BELIEVE IN GOD. The fact that they don’t, means that they have never been presented with a convincing reason. It is not Atheists’ responsibility to do Apologists’ job, and it’s not our fault that Theists can’t.
Many Apologists reject “Science” as if it were an entity in itself, or a conspiracy theory, because it posits information which contradicts what their religion claims.
Science is certain of Nothing, and requires proof of everything!
Religion is certain of Everything, and requires proof of nothing!






















