Nationalising Women on the Volga March 8, 2011
Posted by Beachcombing in Contemporary, Uncategorized.Tags: Cobblers, Lenin, Soviet Union, Syzran, WtH
comments closed
Beachcombing has been remiss in picking on the Soviet Union recently, his last efforts came in October of last year. However, yesterday’s post on Women Service sparked a memory within a memory and sent Beachcombing running to his book shelves. The work in question was Frederick Bailey’s brilliant Mission to Tashkent. Bailey – a British spy working in Tashkent in 1918 – proved to be the perfect commentator on the early Russian revolution having a natural British dislike for the illusion of change and the comic distance and bourgeois decency to go with it. Consider this following passage.
Mrs Stephanovitch was wearing a scarf over her head and carrying a straw hat in her hand. Curiously enough the police never even looked at this hat, and it was fortunate for her that they did not. The Soviet of Syzran, a town on the Volga, had issued a proclamation nationalising women. All the best and most beautiful women, the proclamation stated, belonged to the bourgeoisie, while the peasants and workers had to put up with the second best. Therefore all women were to be public property. This was too much for Lenin and the Bolsheviks at the centre, and the order was withdrawn and possession of even a copy was forbidden. It would have been dangerous propaganda against the Bolsheviks, especially abroad. Mrs Stephanovitch had a copy of the order in her hat…
Now Mrs Stephanovitch’s perfidious literature is not, the reader will be glad to know, noticed. And the gentlemanly Bailey vows never to put a woman’s life in danger again. But Beachcombing doesn’t care. He’s fixating on the Soviet of Syzran and their extraordinary decision, back in 1917 or 1918 [1919? see YL’s comments below], to make Mrs Stephanovitch and her ilk public property.
World history is made up of messianic beliefs that have been misinterpreted or that have morphed around the periphery. So go to Rome in the early seventh century and you would have been fed azymes as communion bread and you would have listened to a chanting priest. If you had gone, instead, though to the Pennines in north England you may have seen a bull sacrificed as the bread and wine transubstantiated… (Bede and some dodgy archaeology from Yeavering). The edges of the world, it is fair to say, do things differently. Ditto Desert Islam versus Nigerian Islam, Classical Buddhism versus Tibetan or Mongolian Buddhism.
Surely the nationalizing of women is a twentieth-century equivalent? In Moscow they were collectivising corner shops, down on the Volga it was the fairer sex’s turn to become a state monopoly.
But did it really happen? And if so what were the consequences?
Beachcombing has been able to find no evidence other than this brief record in the work of a British imperialist. Modern web searches in the major western European languages keep bringing up the privatisation of women, Russian bride sites and the like. In fact, Beachcombing has spent most of the last half hour trying to clean his cookie cache to avoid any misunderstandings with Mrs B.
Any further information or myth-busting would be gladly received: drbeachcombing AT yahoo DOT com
***
8 March 2011: YL writes in, just a couple of hours after publication, with some useful Volga links: most are naturally in Russian. However, naval-history.net includes the actual text in English. It’s a cracker! YL writes: ‘Apparently, it was originally published by a local newspaper in Saratov, some way downstream from Syzran, and then spread around. Presumably, the Soviets have made enquiries into isolated reports of this ‘nationalisation’, which proved false – officially, in Lenin’s published works. There might be some publications in English (so-called proceedings of Denikin’s commission). In addition, there might be a reference in 1919 publications of US Senate, because an American citizen claimed this rumour to be true.’ Now the text itself: Beachcombing particularly enjoyed ‘Former husbands may retain the right of using their wives’ and ‘[e]very man wishing to use a piece of public property should be bearer of certificate from Authoritative Committee of Workmen Soldiers and Peasants Council certifying that he belongs to a working class family’. Bolshevik Press Message – 30 Aug 1919, A decree is proclaimed by the association of Anarchists of the town of Savator in compliance with decisions of the Soviet of Peasants Soldiers and Workers deputies of Kronstadt. The private possession of women is abolished and social inequalities and legitimate marriage having been an instrument in the hands of the Bourgeoisie thanks to which all the best species of beautiful women have been the property of the Bourgeoisie. The proper continuation of human race has been presented and such arguments have induced the organization to issue the present decree. From March the 1st the right to possess women of the ages from 17 to 32 is abolished. The age of women shall be determined by birth certificates and passport. Failing to produce documents the age shall be determined by Committee which shall judge according to appearance. Former husbands may retain the right of using their wives. In case of resistance of husband he shall forfeit his right under former paragraph. All women according to this decree are exempted from private ownership and are proclaimed to be the property of the whole nation. The distribution and management of appropriated women in compliance with the decision of aforesaid organization are transferred to the Savator Anarchists Club from the date of publication of this decree. All women given by it to the use of the whole nation are obliged to represent themselves to a given representative and to supply the required information. A Special Committee is formed for realization of these decrees. Any citizen noticing any women not submitting herself to the address under the decree must make the fact known to the Anarchist Club giving name of woman. Men citizens have right to use one woman 3 times a week for 3 hours observing rules specified below. Every man wishing to use a piece of public property should be bearer of certificate from Authoritative Committee of Workmen Soldiers and Peasants Council certifying that he belongs to a working class family. Every working member is obliged to discount 2% of his earnings to the funds of the Public General Action. This Committee in charge will put these discount funds into state banks and other concerns handing down the funds to the population. Women when they become pregnant are released for three months before and one month after child birth. Children borne are given to a constitution for training after they are one month old, when they are to be trained and educated until they are 17 at the cost of the Public Funds. In case of birth of twins a mother is to receive a prize of £20. All citizens are obliged to watch themselves carefully and those who are guilty of spreading venereal disease will be held responsible and severely punished. Women having lost their health may apply to the Soviet for a pension. The Chief of the Anarchists will be in charge of the temporary measure relating to the decree. All refusing to recognise and support this decree will be proclaimed enemies of the people and country and will be held strictly responsible. Signed Councillor City of Savator. Huge thanks to YL and happy international woman’s day to all those ‘public pieces of property’ who happen to read this blog! Again though: is it true?
Image: Comrade Lenin in Antarctica October 4, 2010
Posted by Beachcombing in Contemporary, Uncategorized.Tags: Antarctica, Image, Lenin, Soviet Union, WtH
comments closed
It was a dull weekend and so Beachcombing is going to give himself a pick-me-up this Monday morning with one of his favourite sports – making fun of the Soviet Union. And what better way to do it than with this fabulous photograph of the southern pole of inaccessibility, the point in Antarctica furthest from the sea.
Beachcombing vaguely remembered references to Soviet scientists setting up base here in 1958 in a vain attempt at polar imperialism: not that the Stars and the Stripes flying on the airless moon made much more sense.
However, he hadn’t known that this temporary base was re-inhabited by a second Soviet group in 1967, while the decadent west was listening to Sgt Peppers and getting ready to drop out and grow their hair intolerably long.
Here Beachcombing’s sources aren’t the best, but one of these two groups – probably the 1958 group – also left a bust of Lenin, a little less than a metre high, on top of their station chimney facing towards Moscow.
Beachcombing loves this almost monotheistic detail: Orthodox Christians are buried facing east, Muslims pray towards Mecca and Lenin has to watch the horizon for the glittering domes of the Kremlin through all eternity.
In early 2007 a party crossed half of Antarctica on sleigh and was able to see the bust of Lenin from miles off as they made their way towards the southern pole of inaccessibility.
They reported that the Soviet polar station is now buried under snow. Indeed, Lenin alone, attached to the chimney, reminds any passer-by [sic] of the reach of the Soviet Union in its silver age: ‘My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings: Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!’
And what is Antarctic Lenin made of, good reader? Marble, granite, alabaster…
Well, actually plastic.
Beachcombing has a large blue file on Antarctica but incredibly there are only five or six pages in it. Any other stories would be gratefully received: drbeachcombing AT yahoo DOT com
Thanks to Ricardo R for this story that passed Beachcombing and his blue folder by.
Did Hitler and Lenin play chess together in 1909? July 5, 2010
Posted by Beachcombing in Contemporary, Modern, Uncategorized.Tags: Chess, Cobblers, Hitler, Lenin, WtH
comments closed
Chess is sometimes called the ‘Game of Kings’. In modern times, at least, it would be truer though to call it the ‘Game of Dictators’. Such unsavoury individuals as Lenin, Napoleon, Fidel Castro, Colonel Gadaffi and the appalling Che Guevara – coming soon to a dress or a tee-shirt near you – all enjoyed the mystique of the pawn and knight. Stalin played but seems not to have been particularly able: he did, however, make sure that official Soviet publications showed him winning the KGB’s own Jeschow.
Beachcombing suspects that chess appeals to the dictator in us all, providing the awesomeness of destruction without the tiresome details: bloody hands, murdered children, mass graves and letters to the Times.
This brings Beachcombing nicely to Hitler…
There are hints that Hitler flew too close to the flame of chess in his early twenties. Herbert Grasemann (obit 1983), author of Schach ohne Partner für Könner (1982), relates, at fourth hand, a story that the young Hitler had fallen in love with the game, but that, finding it all consuming, he had given up chess to concentrate on his political career (as you do).
References and rumours like this might contextualise or, Beachcombing fears, explain a picture that has just recently come to light and that has been auctioned off in the British county of Shropshire.
The picture in question shows a figure, who looks uncannily like Hitler, playing chess with an opponent who looks a little like Lenin. This same picture is signed on the back by a man called Hitler and a man called Lenin in 1909 and was supposedly drawn by Emma Löwenstramm, a Jewish artist based in Vienna at that time who may have been associated with Hitler.
Is this all too good to be true?
Well, as Beachcombing knows history is often too good to be true: ‘you couldn’t make it up’, ‘if they put this in a novel they wouldn’t believe you’ etc And he has also alluded on other occasions to Hitler’s ability to attract the strange to his peculiarly vacuous personality.
But there has to be a suspicion that this particular object is an act of (inspired) fantasy rather than an artefact of twentieth-century nastiness.
Beachcombing notes the following points.
Hitler looks a little too, well, Hitler-like – the Hitler, in fact, that we are used to seeing in later post-war pictures. Lenin, on the other hand, seems to have rather too much hair. The young Lenin was already bald save a hippy-like fringe.
Beachcombing can just about take on trust the fact that two (then) unimportant men might be drawn together playing chess – crazy things happen – but not that they would be asked to sign the sketch’s behind by the artist.
Then finally this is allegedly a work by the minor Jewish artist, Emma Löwenstramm, a Jewish artist. Oh, come on…
Someone is enjoying a practical joke at the expense of Beachcombing and other survivors of the world that Lenin and Hitler created. Make no mistake it is a good joke, even a symbolically valuable joke. And the creator certainly deserves a medal. But it is a joke nonetheless.
If anyone can get the three-hundred page dossier in German by Felix Edenhofer defending the picture’ authenticity to Beachcombing then he would love to read it through. He would also be interested to know for how much the picture was sold when it went under the hammer in April 2010. Then are there any other dictatorial chess players: Beachcombing has heard rumours about Tito and Franco and did Mao play Go before invading Tibet? drbeachcombingATyahooDOTcom
Finally what about, Beachcombing asks himself getting all lyrical, a school of historical fantasy art? A racy poem describing a duel between the young Duke of Wellington, then on the Grand Tour, and a pushy Corsican oik named Napoleon. A red attic vase with Plato tanning the schoolboy Aristotle’s hide. A missing chapter from Casanova’ Histoire de ma vie relating the time that he bedded Marie Antoinette and a score of Jacobins etc etc. The possibilities are endless and if only we could get some auction houses interested…
***
There were several emails over this not least from Richard Westwood-Brooks at Mullock’s Auctioneers. Richard – Beachcombing had got in touch – kindly noted that the picture was not sold in the end and that he hoped to auction it later this year. He also made two points in defence of its authenticity: ‘1. Lenin was a wanted man who was tracked throughout Europe and therefore travelled a great deal in disguise. 2. That it is known he was in Paris and also in Germany and that it was only a matter of a few hours train ride to Vienna from either location – so he could easily have slipped away for a few days.’ ‘Tolpuddle’ helped Beachcombing see another side of this debate. The choice, she wrote, is not between an extraordinary historic artefact and a dastardly fake. The picture could have been drawn up as a very enjoyable intellectual game in the 1930s by a third party – or by Emma Löwenstramm!? – put in a box, forgotten about and then rediscovered as a genuine piece by unwitting relatives or friends. Beachcombing wonders if there is not something in this. Beachcombing doesn’t know why but he keeps coming back to the fact that Hitler is playing white. Thanks to Richard and Tolpuddle.

