

I had an evening flight on Saturday so was able to see three shows in Bologna — but I chose badly. Still, maybe this made it easier to go home.
THE ANNIHILATION OF FISH (1999), newly restored, is directed by Charles Burnett from a fringe-theatre script by Anthony Winkler. James Earl Jones plays Fish, a Jamaican immigrant in LA, sharing Margot Kidder’s boarding house with Lynn Redgrave. I knew I was in trouble with this one immediately — big comic performances shot in big dramatic closeups. I was embarrassed for the cast. Jones keeps things human but is hampered by his struggle with his Jamaican accent (Winkler is Jamaican-born). All the characters are mad, but it’s a sentimentally-conceived madness. And there’s enough story for a fifteen-minute short. But some of the audience loved it, so my reaction may be just that, my reaction.

SURCOUF (Luitz-Morat, 1924) was pretty good, and beautifully restored. A swashbuckler about a Normandy pirate, with lovely location work. Most of Peter Falk’s checklist of adventure elements from THE PRINCESS BRIDE (“Captures! Escapes! Tortures! Pirates!”) are present, if in abbreviated form. For this was a 45-minute cut-down Pathe-Baby 9.5mm version, reduced to two reels (45 mins). So it was good, but a bit whistle-stop in its narration. Antonin Artaud was on hand, giving the silliest performance in what I would describe as the David Warner role. This would have been excellent if complete, and a pretty good entertainment even truncated, were I more alert, but though I wasn’t quite dropping off my perch, SEVEN SAMURAI had rather depleted me while also setting the bar very high indeed.
(Despite its small-gauge source, the film looked MUCH better than the image above.)
Then there was a collection of shorts from 1904, under the heading of ghosts or fantasmi. It was the sort of quirky assemblage the great Marianne Lewinsky programmes so well, but I feel she would have rejected most of these. None of them were particularly interesting, except for some stupendous globular nitrate decomposition which seemed to attack one character in particular, smearing and stretching and burning him out, making him go wibbly-wobbly or swamping him in a morass of bubble-flicker.
The journey home was a bit like SURCOUF, it seemed long and epic on the one hand, but slightly dull and disjointed on the other.







