Archive for DW Griffith

The Sunday Intertitle: Bucolic Death Wish

Posted in FILM with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 22, 2026 by dcairns

As a Richard Barthelmess “stan,” I believe the expression is, there were two particular silents I really ought to have seen. It’s only the length that’s detained me from watching WAY DOWN EAST. I’m sure I’ll get to it. TOL’ABLE DAVID, directed by Henry King, was the other, but I’ve just rectified that.

King likes this kind of Americana stuff and is good at it. The story of a mild-mannered country boy forced to man up when his family is destroyed by a “fugitive family” of desperate villains, it’s like a proto-DEATH WISH with a pastoral setting. I guess the forerunners of the Bronson vigilante film generally were rural affairs, like BILLY JACK, which I also haven’t seen.

Not that the movie is as vicious as Michael Winner’s bloodthirsty rapefest, but the bad guys do kill our hero’s father and dog, and cripple his brother. The coming-of-age drama of violent retribution was a big inspiration to Harold Lloyd, whose THE KID BROTHER reconfigures the story as a much milder comedy, but still with some terror surviving intact. (There’s a Glenn Tryon vehicle, THE WHITE SHEEP, which bridges the gap — TKB is often described as a remake, and Lloyd was happy to call it an inspiration, but the source isn’t acknowledged in the credits. Haven’t managed to find a copy of TWS.)

In terms of extreme content, the most surprising thing in TD is a shot of the hero’s sister breastfeeding.

Barthelmess is great — younger, obviously, and much handsomer, with a thinner, more angular face. He uses his eyes wonderfully. It’s a very physical role, and RB at 26 does a terrific job of embodying both adolescent vigour and gawkiness.

Image

In the Hatburns, the film has a truly horrible set of villains, and if they’ve been perhaps chosen for physiognomic menace rather than acting chops, with Torrence in their midst they’re not short of performance skill. They reminded me some of the baddies in Maurice Tourneur’s VICTORY: instantly alarming.

The message of the film is very American and very damaging. Harold Lloyd clearly believed it. The hero must and shall triumph over impossible odds by superhuman effort. If you don’t win, it just means you didn’t try hard enough. I’m a sucker for this kind of story, maybe we all are, but I don’t believe in it. Sometimes impossible odds are just that. (Proud defeatist!)

Image

Henry King is getting a bit more appreciation nowadays and this is very much his kind of material — well worth your time.

The Sunday Intertitle: Death and the Baby

Posted in FILM with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on May 17, 2025 by dcairns

I read of Arrigo Frusta in Roberto Curti’s majestic Italian Gothic Horror Films: 1957-1969, a book which generously covers not only the years specified in its title but all the years before. Curti assiduously traces the origins of the Barbara Steele-type Gothic horror in the melodramas and diva dolorosa films of previous decades. Frusta gets a mention because “Maschera tragica (“Tragic Mask,” 1911) by Arrigo Frusta (real name Augusto Sebastiano Ferraris) transposed Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Masque of the Red Death” to
Naples and added to it an optimistic religious conclusion.”

Sadly the film isn’t available, but LA MADRE E LA MORTE (THE MOTHER AND DEATH, also 1911) is. One is immediately reminded of Lang’s DER MUDE TOD/DESTINY.

Death shows up to claim an ailing baby. The mother appeals to heaven and the Angel of Life (hmm, not sure of the scriptural authority behind this figure but there’s an Angel of Death who acts as a kind of celestial hitman for Moses, so I guess he ought to have an opposite number, and she ought to be female. For balance).

Image
"The angel of life indicates the path taken by Death."

Mom follows the direction indicated, somewhat vaguely it must be admitted, by the A of L, and suddenly we’re on a snowy location. I hope mom doesn’t exhaust herself with melodramatic/Italian gesticulation before she reaches her otherworldly destination.

Rather than the conventional three-headed dog, Hades is guarded by a nice old lady who is bribable with items of clothing. This leads to a spectacular icy chasm where mom proceeds cautiously until she’s safely back in the studio. Death has, from the first, strongly resembled portraits of Father Time, only black-robed, and the Kingdom of Death, in its set design, seems to make clear the connection. Death = Time. Seems valid.

Image

This Italian mama is particularly devoted to her offspring and soon has Death on the ropes with an overwhelming crusade of semaphore. His troupe of shockheaded pageboys are no good as backup. But the more she waves her arms, the more he points, and one particular indication causes the image of the departed baby to appear on the face of the nearest grandfather clock. I don’t quite know what to make of this. Is the infant condemned to eternity inhabiting the woodwork, like Joan Chen in Twin Peaks?

Old Father Death now conveys mama to “the Fountain of the Future” which sounds like an Epcot Center display but instead grants a vision via double or triple exposure of the babyfaced grandfather clock, then images of the child growing up — a sort of semi-real fantasy projection, like uncrucified Willem Dafoe’s life in Scorsese’s THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST? Our dead baby, who had seemed so noble when he was merely a small corpse, grows up to be a right little bastard, more interested in pounding a tabletop than doing his homework, throwing mama’s soup on the floor, and eventually getting swallied and murdering a man in a tavern brawl. Finally, the ungrateful shit hangs himself in his prison cell, cursing life.

So that’s why we have infant mortality, so there won’t be any bad people. And that must be why, with infant mortality falling, there are so many more bad people. No wonder RFK Jr. is striving to bring back all the old childhood diseases, so we won’t be plagued with men like him anymore.

Mama is now persuaded that her child’s death was for the common good, and Frusti ends with an allegory within an allegory, dissolving from a Madonna pierced with swords to a Madonna clutching bouquets.

This sort of non-diegetic ending, echoing the famous gunshot at the end of Porter’s GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY, seems to anticipate the later advances of Griffith, per Tom Gunning, in which concluding scenes which ARE diegetic — part of the story — use the camera as a narrative device to present, demonstrate, dramatize story beats rather than merely recording a set of performances. What’s peculiar is that the non-diegetic version seems at first a more abstruse or sophisticated device than Griffith’s “And so…” shots. But the non-diegetic endings came first.

Quite a weird little tale, and I’d love to see what he got up to with Poe’s Masque. The “optimistic religious conclusion” Curti ascribes to that film seems very much in keeping with the religiose conclusion here. If anyone can point me in the director of Frusta’s TRAGIC MASK I’d be grateful.

Twirls and Curtsies

Posted in FILM with tags , , , , , on December 3, 2024 by dcairns
Image

Very chuffed to pick up an inexpensive copy of Tom Gunning’s DW Griffith and the Origins of Narrative Film. I read the University Library’s copy with great enthusiasm — a book which might transform your understanding of film language and its development — and then I returned it, unfinished, because it was overdue. Glancing at what I’d missed as I rode the bus home, I found some useful terms.

Gunning distinguishes between the histrionic and the verisimilar style, which is a neat way of saying “all that waving your arms about guff” and “underplaying.” The H word usefully seems to contain within its meaning the rhetorical quality that’s made up of stock gestures intended to signify things — emotions and thoughts — rather than actually bearing any resemblance to human behaviour. Whereas “verisimilar” makes clear that the underplaying is not just smaller-scale but also based on an observation (external, of gestures, internal, of emotional responses) of actual life.

But the best phrase of all is “gestural soliloquy.” A bit of a mouthful, sure, but I’ve been talking for some time about the “Keystone explicatory pantomime,” and this is shorter. Also, Keystone didn’t invent it. One’s appreciation of Mack Sennett’s many fine qualities has to be tempered when you realise he was present when Griffith phased out the GS or KEP, but he then carried on using it in his own films, to little useful effect.

The gestural soliloquy or Keystone explicatory pantomime is when an actor turns to the audience, usually when alone or when the co-star’s back is turned, and by brisk hand gestures attempts to convey to us what they intend. It’s an abomination, or an interesting byway in the development of cinematic performance, according to taste.

Gunning’s great gift is close analysis placed in context, and in his writing on AN ARCADIAN MAID he enumerates the movements and gestures of leads Mary Pickford and Mack Sennett, which sound a trifle melodramatic on the page — innocent maid Pickford curtsies a lot, Sennett, playing a lecherous and mercenary villain, literally twirls his moustache — but are all rooted in psychology, class, circumstance, attitude, rather than coming from some book of stock gestures. The preening of the face-fungus is the character’s vanity and care in his appearance coming out, and the gesture, as a gesture, is intended for no one but himself. I also give Mack credit for not making a meal of it — his fingers wring the tip of the moustache just as quickly as they deliver a cigarette to his lips for a lightning puff.

The only downside of owning and reading this book, both of which are recommended, is that you find yourself admiring Griffith. It would be nice to be able to ignore him. There are other people, after all. But Gunning makes the case for Griffith’s foundational status and magnitude. Fortunately I find I can admire him and detest him at the same time, and this is good practice. There is much about the cinema that one should do one’s best to hate, even if one loves it, and Griffith embodies the good and the bad simultaneously. The curtsy and the moustache-twirl.