delCapo

LMFAO!! ahahahahaha…. that was my first reaction when I read the sms news.

Seriously, “Nazridiocy” at it’s best again.

Mr Taxi king… a language question – “Riot” vs “Demonstration / Protest”. Use a dictionary lah.

Which part of any of the Bersih, Anti-ISA, Lawyer’s Walks, Anti-Lynas, Occupy Dataran, Hindraf, Malaysian’s for Teoh Bang Hock / Death in Custody… even our good friends Perkasa’s demonstrations, protests had any HINT of RIOT in them? Which one?

The closest thing to a riot all those assemblies has was the platoons of RIOT police (FRU) the government deployed. The only violence was from their batons, shields, kicks, punches and water cannons.

When people walk and express their support or displeasure in public, it’s called FREEDOM.

When motherfuckers go chopping up their neighbours, or break into shops, start fire, steal goods… it’s called CRIME.

In both the May 13 and London riots the problem were NOT about what laws or regulations the country had… it’s about some deep social issues.

BODOH!

Now, a logic question – you seriously think your all-mighty Peaceful Assembly Bill 2011 could have STOPPED May13 or the London riots?

Those rioters were going to stop and think “hang on a second…. the Peaceful Assembly thing say cannot lah… better stay at home and forget about going out to chop the fellas down the road”… or “blimey, there’s a law that say we disnae going oot and break them shop windows and steal them iPads and TVs like.. better we just go to the pub and have a peaceful pint, no? 

ahahahaha….

Lastly, the best part of Nazridiocy is… the lies or the lack of facts.

“To strengthen his view, Nazri cited the London riots, which led to the ban on street demonstrations by the British government” – news

Erhem… Fact is – the British government only imposed  “A 30-day ban on protest marches  in five ‘troubled’ boroughs of London.”

Nice try, bozo.