Archive

Archive for the ‘Ideas’ Category

Bike Porn 3 Trailer

September 28, 2009 Leave a comment

Holy crap, these people have done everything I ever thought of doing with the bike + kinky sex combo, but have done it way better than I ever could.  I love it when that happens!

Shoulder stretches

September 18, 2009 Leave a comment

The friendly folks at Forum Bondage pointed me towards an excellent video on shoulder stretches, which is something I really do need to do if I’m ever going to be comfy with my arms behind my back.

My gender and me, again

July 11, 2009 4 comments

I have so many thoughts swirling around in my head about gender.

I wonder what it would be like to go 6 hours of waking life without considering my clothes, my hair, my body language, my voice, my attitude, my space.  Not to wonder about my gender presentation, not to imagine I was doing something different.

In the past few weeks I have come across bits and pieces about bois every so often.  It is so appealing to me except that I find myself to be a Kinsey 0 and so not affiliated with queer communities.  That said, queer ideas on sexuality seem to be much more appealing to me that those of the hetro commnity.  I guess my perfect world involves a man who is comfortable playing with gender in this way with me. This is why I always find men who have a bit o’ the queer in them somehow so attractive.  I think they won’t insist on me always being a girl, they won’t be uncomfortable with switching; they might even love it.

Oh I read a really sexy post tonight, via May, When I was a Boy.

Sometimes I think to myself, “Hey I have been a committed polyamorist for my entire adult life.  I have been kinky my whole life.  My gender is still a questionable issue to me.  I have rejected hetronormitivity in every way other than my love of men.  Am I really straight?”

Lately I have been doing a bit more of a special kind of activity you might not expect me capable of.  I have been going out in public in drag, as a woman.  Last week, for the first time in my life I left the house for a few hours wearing high healed boots.  (Oh wait actually it was the second time… once I ended up going somewhere when I had just planned to go down the block.)  Sometimes on hot days I wear sun dresses.  I bought a tube of mascara which I occasionally apply.  Nothing too fancy but I feel incredibly conspicuous.  I think everyone will know what a costume this is for me.  I have to remind myself that while it feels as though I’m going out in some sort of fetish gear, to that rest of the world I am just preforming my gender normally, even sub par.

I normally don’t discuss my submissive fantasies here, because one of the most erotic things in the world to me is being figured out, having the truth dragged out of me, by a prying, relentless dominant (whoops I let a second one slip. 😉 ).  So there are things that I intentionally don’t volunteer, not because I am ashamed of them but because it’s really a lot of fun for me to be a bit of a puzzle.  Anyway I will give one out which is that I want to be made to dress up in full on drag, to be a woman like I never have been before with a hair do and makeup and pretty clothes that you can’t ride a bike in.  I want this to be done to me.  To me this is a humiliation scene.  Not as in “it is humiliating to be a woman” but because I think it would be like stepping into another body, a body I am so uncomfortable in.

I mean, I have attempted to do this to myself, in as much as I am able.  I actually have some nice women’s clothes.  But every time I am about to leave the house I am afraid.  I think it would be unbelievably sexy to be forced to do this.

I don’t think it would carry the same emotional weight for me to be made to dress like a man, as many of my clothes are already men’s clothes.  Though I definitely present as a woman on the street, I think my tomboyishness definitely shows through.I think dressing in full on male drag would be fun, but some days I basically do that anyway other than my hair which is long and uncomfortable any way but piled on top of my head.

What have dykes done for kink?

July 10, 2009 Leave a comment

Well, well, well.  I feeling all pleased with What has feminism done for kink? But in the fetlife group where I posted it, after a bunch of nice compliments I got schooled by Playful Pet.  I am going to take some time to think about this and then I will study this further.  Unfortunately I am pretty embroiled in school and completely broke so nothing involving books is happening for the next few months.  😉  She gave me permission to repost what she said here.  It’s really interesting and you should read it.

With all due respect, please read up on The Feminist Sex Wars, also known as the Lesbian Sex Wars.

Those original Consent Arguements were written and argued by LESBIANS, more often then not Feminists. Lesbians, actually Leatherdykes, were the first women to open women owned and operated sex stores specifically designed for women, they were the first women ever to create lesbian porn by women, for women, known as On Our Backs. It was the Leatherdykes who came out of the Closet and sounded the Alarm regarding Women and AIDS during the first Wave of the AIDS crises in the eighties early 1990s, it was Leatherdykes that went around creating a Feminism known as Sex Positive Feminism, along with Leatherbykes, a few out straight Leatherwomen, as well as some more mainstream Vanilla women, especially women in the Sex Industry.

It was Leatherdykes that created the very first Safe Sex Campaigns that talked about Women and HIV, this was back in the day when the Feminist Movement was quite Homophobic, and really couldn’t care less about “bad” women, such as lesbians, women in the sex trade, poor women, etc. were starting to die from AIDS and how there was no research, hell, no acknowledgement regarding Women and AIDS at all, being that it was a “homosexual disease,” a “gay mens disease.”

It was Leatherdykes that had the first ever public Women Only SM Play Parties, It was Leatherdykes who went to the feminist coffee houses and readings and bravely stood up in front of thirty to fifty Feminist women and read out stories depicting BDSM, many times facing a whole room of women screaming at them, “betrayer, abuser, criminal, sexual deviant,” and so forth.

There is also something known as Feminist BDSM and Feminist BDSM principals that has been around for almost thirty years. Read the New Bottoming Book by Janet Harding and Dossie Eastman, to get a concise depiction of Feminist BDSM, and it’s counterpart, The New Topping Book. There is the concept of Full Powered Bottom, and Full Powered Submissive, main building blocks of Feminist BDSM, an alternative version of BDSM. Like I said…been around for, Oh, ALMOST THIRTY YEARS.

With respect, it was also, in Canada, Gay Leathermen and Leatherdykes, who fought almost every single legal fight up through the Supreme Court of our Country, which lead to the reality where it is now safe to have public BDSM clubs in our communities, and safe for all the pansexual folks to come out and play. We did this back in the seventies, eighties and nineties, before the Internet, when straight BDSMers simply, as a whole community refused to Come Out and fight the legal Fights.

Leatherdykes and Leatherbykes have been Leaders in creating and discussing alternative versions of BDSM, FeminisM & BDSM AND Sex Positive Feminism for almost FORTY years now.

So with all due respect, when you’re talking about “What Feminists have Done for BDSM,” you might want to stop trying to make Mainstream anti porn Feminism look like it is somehow currently and has been in the past, friends of Leatherwomen, and go over the Lesbian History Group, or the Old Guard Group, or hell, even the Leatherdyke threads and say a much, much too late “thank you,” to all of us, who literally got our asses kicked, got shunned from our communities, got thrown out of Feminist communties and groups, face hatred by mainstream feminism, real serious hatred and predjudice, so that all women into BDSM ALL women, of ALL sexual orienations, and ALL women in general, would have an Alternative version of female sexuality, represented to them, one that was rooted in Woman as Sexual Agent instead of Woman as Sexual Victim.

Oh, and by the way, all those silly dildoes you see in your stores shaped liked dolphins, and rabbits, and goddessess and the such? It was Leatherdykes, who taught themselves how to make silicone dildoes, and then went, in their basements many a time, exploring how to create dildoes and other sex toys that didn’t look like male genitalia, in order to help ALL women explore their sexuality more fully, and not feel threatened or frightened by such things as “dildoes.” Or have to face the shaming arguement that you we’re “aping the patriarchy,” and ‘supporting men,” if you dared to stick something up your cunt for masturbation purposes, or desired to fuck your guy or girl in the ass.

Without out the very real blood sweat and tears of the first Leatherdykes who dared to take on Andrea Dworking and her like of Anti Porn Feminists, communities such as Fetlife, both online and offline, would not exist today. Nor would women owned sex stores for women, nor would masturbation workshops, and women created porn, etc. Please, whether your friends with homosexual women or not, acknowledge and show respect to the lesbian and bisexual Leatherwomen who sacrificed and fought so deep, so hard and at times, so angrily, so demandingly, so danm OFFENSIVELY, for the right of all women to define their sexuality and sexual experiences for themselves, by themselves, instead of having a bunch of Pro Censorship and Anti Porn Mainstream Feminists define their sexuality and sexual experiences FOR them.

Thank You and In Sisterhood, Playful Pet

Proud Baby Sister of 1980s/early 1990s Leatherdykes, The original Sex Positive Feminists, and writers of the Original BDSM Consent Arguements.

Then someone challenged her further and she said,

The writer of the thread seems to want to equate all Feminism as being Pro BDSM, Pro Porn, and helpful to BDSM, when the truth is, much Feminist Theory and Sexual Analyses, historically and even today, has been anything BUT friendly to BDSM. Sex Positive Feminism, which Leatherdykes and a few other women, created in response to Anti POrn and Mainstream Feminism HAS been extremely instruemental, and I’ve listed all sorts of examples of that, and simply pointing out that it was not simply Lesbians, that Leatherdykes who were at the forefront of all of this.

Considering that we’ve just gotten the most extreme anti porn laws ever, brought into Britain, which are extremely detrimental to the BDSM community there, as they basically make even taking pictures of your OWN bruises and showing them online a criminal offense, with jail time, and that many a mainstream Feminist Organization helped get these laws in place, I think it’s simply unwise, sending a message that Feminism, in general has been Pro BDSM, when in fact, it has not.

It is also wise, to give credit where credit is due, to make sure that the women whose lives and relationships were deeply affected by the impact of coming out as Leatherdykes and fighting the Anti Porn Feminists, be acknowledged. And that all they gave to us, including a New Brand of Feminism, be acknowledge. Saying they are “all feminists,” erases and makes invisible not just that they were Lesbian Feminists but that they were also Leatherdykes, and some Leatherdykes who weren’t particularly Feminist as well. Our history and our visibility within the larger Feminist History and Womens History is important to us.

And so I was just making sure that it WAS visible. Generally when one says, “Feminist,” it’s heterosexual feminst histories or perspectives that are acknowledged, white, middle class, able bodied, heterosexual feminist histories. Thus it’s not okay to erase the “Lesbian” or the “Leatherdyke” from this history, as it pretty much then returns us to Invisbility status. smile There is such a thing as “revising history,” to erase those deeds or activities that make your own group look bad in the eyes of those reading the history books. Mainstream Feminism and Anti Porn, sometimes known as Anti Sex Feminism, has caused all sorts of women, especially Leatherwomen and lesbians all sorts of harm. It’s not okay to erase that or even imply that this kind of harm has never happened.

And furthermore

Sadly, there has been alot of revising and full out erasing of the 80s and 90s years of Feminist History, especially where the Sex Wars are concerned, it seems, at least in Canada. That also takes out all the politics of the Pride Movement, which is a cultural movement, separate but connected to the Human Rights Legal Movement. For a really good description of Pride MOvements in General, I recommend http://www.disabledandproud.com which discusses both Black Pride and LGBT Pride Movements in its discussion of the fledgling Disability Pride Movement which is in its Baby Steps of Creation.

Regarding Feminsm and BDSM, again, for some strange reason, there’s been almost a complete erasure of it from the Internet, but there’s a Great Leathercrip by the name of Trinity (I personally coined the term “Leathercrip,” in order to bring issues of sex, disability and lgbt pride issues together, and those of us trying to be a “second wave,” so to speak of Freedom of Sexual Choice Warriors who happened to be people with disabilities, mostly women with disabilities actually.) Anyways, Trinity like me, is feeling pretty burned out these days, but she has a great Web Site, Let Them Eat Pro SM Feminist Space which is GREAT for intellectual and academic arguements. I’m not an Academic Feminist myself, more of a Street Feminist. I also have a blog, which has other writers on it as well, on Sex and Disability called SexAbility It’s waaaay less academic, and when I share, it’s much more emotional, raw, and well, “street level,” I wouldn’t have a chance of holding my own academically the way Trinity does. I discuss alot of BDSM, Feminism, Sex Wars, etc. related topics on that at times as well. I’ve been taking some time off writing on it, as of late, because I’ve just felt so burned out, trying to keep the memory alive, and doing my part to fight this second wave that is rising, with the focus being on Internet Porn, but, as always, they use alot of the BDSM websites, and gay porn especially, to make their points that it’s dangerous to women and children.

Lesbian Sex Wars by Emma Heally

Lesbian Sex Scandals Quite “heady” this one is, very academic, but interesting if you can wade through it.

Coming to Power THIS is a classic, and every Leatherwoman entering into BDSM, regardless of sexual orientation should read it, simply because it’s part of Leatherwomen History. I haven’t read it myself, because it was out of print for a long time, and I’m thrilled to see that I might be able to buy it online! SQUEAL of excitement LOL

I am by NO WAY an ‘expert,” at all on this period, being that I was coming out gay and growing up during it. You could say my memories and perspective is that of a “Civilian,” during the war, and because I have been poor and struggled with disabilities most of my adult life, therefor living on the margins of society both lesbian and straight, until recently, I guess in my experience, those “wars” never really ended. Certainly, as I say, not with whats happening over in Britain, which, should be of special concern to Canadian Leather Folks as we’re currently negotiating to get into the European Union, not simply free trade, but equalizing some of our laws, etc. as well, so we can all work over there and them over here.

Here’s some info on that:

Englands Extreme Porn Laws and BDSM

Feminists Against Censorship

Surviving the Extreme Porn Law

SCOTLAND: Jail for Downloading extreme sex images

Kinky 3 way

July 4, 2009 Leave a comment

I have a fantasy in which a friend of mine asks me to tie up their lover for them.  It’s no particular couple.  There are a few options.  All the sexy people I know.  In my fantasy I tie one, and the untied friend teases and touches their partner the way they like.  Everyone is a bit nervous but it turns out being fun.  It never breaks out into full on sex but my two friends make out while I make one of them really easy to get at.  The bottom is happy and beautiful and loves it.  The untied partner does the things I might generally do more of while alone, like pressing against, pulling the ropes to make them tighter.  I am just there to be a ropemonkey.  But because I enjoy both individuals in the couple so much, this is really really fun for me.

Categories: Bondage, Ideas, My writing Tags: , ,

Body play; thoughts

May 2, 2009 Leave a comment

I went to a workshop by Andrea Zanin the other day. She admitted the vagueness of her description of it during the workshop, but also explained she was trying to get at something more substantive than simple techniques (not to knock techniques).

Body Play: Creating Erotic Scenes—with Andrea Zanin
The body is an exquisite instrument… and we can all become better players! In this workshop, we’ll talk about ways to tune into your partner during the opening notes of your scenes, look at how different areas of the body hold different emotions, and learn techniques for tapping into those emotions. Then, it’s time to play! We’ll look at fun ways to use your hands, arms, legs, torso, feet, mouth and other body parts to create sensual SM symphonies that can range from gentle to challenging. This is an interactive workshop; you’ll be encouraged to ask questions, share your experiences and contribute your ideas.

There were a variety of people there, including a couple who had apparently no interest in BDSM and thought it was supposed to be about massage and other gentle ways of loving. At one point Andrea asked for a volunteer to get hit in the chest and the husband volunteered. I couldn’t help but wonder if he didn’t have some idea about the nature of the workshop, really. He did generally seem to be quite into it. I wonder if this was his way of broaching the subject with his ladyfriend (who looked decidedly less comfortable; I can’t recall speaking more than 5 words the whole time).

The main meat of the workshop was in two parts. The first was brainstorming about how to use various body parts to play with someone else. I liked the idea of not being reliant on tools and techniques to achieve effects. (Especially as a beginner whose technical skillz are limited.) It worked by naming a body part and then people said things they thought could be done with that. An elbow, a foot etc. I think this would be a fun game to play with a lover. 🙂

The second part was about the emotions and energy associated with particular body parts, and how they make people feel. Also relationships between one body part on one person being used on a different part on the other. Andrea said that a lot of it is obvious once you think about it, and she war correct.

I loved all the demonstrations. I especially liked the last one, where she showed how she begins a scene, which was by holding someone from behind, whispering to her, holding her hand, putting her hand over her chest, swaying gently. The woman she was doing this with absolutely melted into her. It was a really sweet thing to watch. I thought of times I have been wrapped in an emotion like that, when I have entangled someone else in my own. I also continually marveled at Andrea’s abilities as a workshop presenter, her ability to throw herself into exemplifying what were quite intimate situations, with strangers. I am envious of her skillz.

A picture I drew of tying up a lover.  Andrea holding the woman reminded me very much of the day I drew here and one subsequent day.

A picture I drew of tying up a lover. Andrea holding the woman reminded me very much of the day I drew here and one subsequent day with the same person.

While the information conveyed was interesting, the best part of this for me was getting to hear from someone who plays as a top/dom who seems to be coming from a similar place to me. This lady managed to talk for 2 hours on the general subject of BDSM without being offensive or ignorant. (Far from being ignorant she obviously out-skillz me by many, many fold, which is my favourite kind of person.) I need to find more people like this. She explicitly asked consent for various activities involved in what she planned on doing. She didn’t just obtain consent for one activity and assume it extended to others. I loved this because my some of my recent experiences have been so dismal in this regard. It was really, really affirming for me to be reminded that there are other people involved in this who have thought about things a bit further than how to wrangle a “yes” out of their subject.

I got to be briefly part of one of the demonstrations. While I have very little trouble talking all about sex and the erotic (have trouble shutting up though), I generally have a very strong aversion toward getting up to do anything other than talk in front of a group. I mean, if I was at a magic show I wouldn’t volunteer to help with a card trick being done either. I think it’s because I am so unsure of my body, I am so clumsy, I’m really afraid of tripping, or that I’ll drool or something, I don’t know. I don’t think I have ever gotten up and been a “volunteer from the audience” in my entire life. I had no intention of sharing anything other than words and ideas at this workshop. But then she asked for a volunteer to get slapped in the face, which is one of my top three favourite erotic activities. And I know this can be uncomfortable for a lot of people. So I valiantly sacrificed my comfort for the good of everyone else. (Yeah right. Am I fooling you?)

(My body is so fickle about pleasure, there are precious few kinds of touch or play I can rely upon to make me feel good. For the record, two of the others are someone pulling my hair and a lover’s cock rubbing my body, which I find to be spectacularly charged with erotic energy in a way I cannot quite explain, but I think it is one of my special super-empathetic abilities, to share someone else’ pleasure. Anyway back on topic now…)

So I tried that, partly for the chance to get slapped in the face, which isn’t really such a rare occasion in my life since it’s something I have taught any lover who doesn’t already know to do. (In general boys are extremely reluctant to slap me, until I convince them to do it once or twice. The they see how incredibly hot and happy it makes me, which changes their opinion of it substantially.) If the presenter had been a man I may not have bothered, as I can get slapped by a man any day of the week. (OK, only most days.) But I have been wondering for so long if any of this would work for me with a woman.

When I was a teenager I surprised myself and others by turning out really hetro. (I honestly expected myself to be a lesbian from a pretty young age. It took me a long time to accept my deeply exclusive love for cock and the men they are attached to, and my indifference towards anybody’s cunt but my own.) In highschool, while my girlfriends were making out with each other and drooling over Angelina Jolie I found myself oriented entirely towards men. In my earlier 20s I developed a crush on a lady friend of mine, and eventually, after giggling constantly around her for longer than was cute, we made out a bit. I found myself completely unaroused, although I felt nice and intimate to be rolling around in a park with someone who’s company I generally enjoy so enthusiastically. My mind loved it but my cunt was silent on the matter.

So after evaluating this experience and my general feelings towards women (none of whom have ever made me feel hot between the legs) I decided that so far as vanilla sex goes I am 100% hetro. A Kinsey zero. (That said I have a hard time thinking of myself as “straight” as a kinky, poly, genderqueer person. But that’s for another post.)

But I have this theory that I could probably submit to a woman. I think this because the feelings I have had when submitting to men are so different from the ones I have when engaging in vanilla lovemaking with them. For sure there can be some cross over. But they are distinct in how I hunger for them and how I feel when they run through my body.

(I could probably also dominate a woman, in the far distant future when I am comfortable enough with domination. I think I could only do this with a strongly feminist woman.)

I do not think the nature of this could be overly sexual. I mean different people play more or less sexually. For some, BDSM is a kind of foreplay. (Foreplay being a male-centred and problematic concept to begin with.) With rare exception, unless I am first engaged with someone like this in a vanilla sexual way, with kink being a secondary aspect of the relationship, I find this undesirable in any situation. It feels boring and awkward. When I submit I am interested in being obedient, in serving, in pleasing, in giving of myself. I can do this in so many ways other than being fucked, giving head and allowing my orifices to be probed. I don’t think I could very enjoyably serve a woman who wanted primarily sexual service out of me, but neither do I enjoy this with men.

While cunt has no particular attraction to me, I have found that a strong D/s dynamic gives me the ability to eroticize anything. For example, I am not drawn in particular to feet. In a vanilla setting I may squeeze my partner’s feet, to connect a touch through the whole body, or massage them because I know if feels great, but my interest in feet specifically is quite low. However when I have been told to kiss my dominant’s feet I find it to be a deeply satisfying act.

A picture I made one time of myself at a dominant's feet

A picture I made one time of myself at a dominant's feet

I feel like if I can enjoy feet, I can probably enjoy cunts. Not to offend anyone by saying they are the same, other than they are both body parts holding no intrinsic desire for me. Except, something I wonder, is if cunts have same strong erotic energy I can feed on like I do for cocks. I wonder if I can do this in the context of a D/s dynamic. I wonder what I could learn for the right person. I am so curious.

So I have this theory about myself but I am not sure how to go about trying it out. I feel like there is a lot of uneasy feelings from lesbians about “bi curious” women. But I don’t know if that word would really quite apply to me. Cause I know I am not bisexual.

Although intellectually I agree with the friend I made out with, who always says beings straight is stupid; who cares about genitals? It’s the person that matters. I tried for years to bring myself around to that emotionally and carnally but was unable to. I also wonder if this whole idea about the potential to serve a woman is more of the same, if really I am just trying to deny my identity.

I would not draw any huge conclusions about being slapped around for 2 minutes in a workshop. But it certainly didn’t feel like that time I made out with my friend in the park. I mean it felt warm and not cool. It felt really nice.

I felt stupid afterwards for leaving so quickly at the end of the workshop. I wanted to stay and talk to all the interesting people who were there, but my body propelled me out the door and onto my bike. I was thinking so hard, and I was so flustered, I didn’t have any faith in my ability to hold a conversation with strangers. I have the odd quirk of being much more comfortable talking in a group than one-on-one. Some how there is less pressure, because attention is more diffused.  On the way home, a thought I used to have often but which had faded from my consciousness popped back into my head, “How do I get recruited?” (Apparently I am much more pitifully passive than I would like to believe myself.)

Anyway at the end of it I really enjoyed this workshop although most of the things I thought of the most were not the direct content of it.

3 Objectifications

April 21, 2009 Leave a comment

The word objectification has two or maybe three different meanings. I think it is useful to understand different ways people use the word in order to communicate better.

The commenest definition

The most mainstream and agreed-upon meaning of objectification is a simplification of feminist concepts. It is something along the lines of “thinking of people as things.” This is so simple and obviously unreasonable for day-to-day life that most people are able to let themselves off the hook. When was the last time you looked at someone and thought to yourself, “That statue of flesh and organs does not deserve treatment as a human being due to it’s genitals”?  People associate objectification with an abundance of attention to the aesthetic,  neglecting the emotional and the intellectual.

The feminist definition

Of course the idea of objectification is actually much more nuanced than that.

When the gaze moves to appreciate someone purely on aesthetic terms, that is not truly objectification. It becomes problematic when the value of the person is defined by the judgment of the viewers. Their sense of self is secondary from their aesthetic value. They are a beautiful object of art at best and a shameful mess at worst, regardless of what goes on in their heads or what effect they may have on the world.

This attitude is highly prevalent in mainstream culture, especially the objectification of women.  It’s one of those things that is so ubiquitous you may not even notice it.  Women’s values are tightly tied to their aesthetic appeal.  While beauty has always, and will continue to be, appreciated by all people, in our culture it is a ticket to respect and power, much more so than for a man.

An example is statements to the effect that women’s bodies are works of art. Art is created to be beautiful, thoughtful or pleasant to those around it. A woman’s body exists to be useful and pleasant to her and nothing more than that.

Sorry, I know the above is kind of awkward, I am not an academic by any means.  I am more skilled at explaining these things through conversation that in writing.

The kinkster’s definition

Of course there is also the fun way to objectify. This is when a person takes on the role of something inanimate. For example in this Allen Jones sculpture:

Allen Jones: Chair

Allen Jones: Chair

I remember reading in a Midori essay, when you objectify someone, you ignore them, but you ignore them in this very special way; no one in the whole world is being ignored just like that.

Tassels

April 7, 2009 Leave a comment

tassels2

If I had a person who was also a mat, I would probably make that mat match the rest of my decor. I think some nice purple tassels would be good

Categories: Ideas, My photos, Rope

Wool under rope?

April 4, 2009 Leave a comment

Just to bring it back on topic, I have been thinking of tying overtop various kinds of clothes.  I find rope over clothes pretty sexy to begin with.  But what about over wool with the lining ripped out?  Obviously not swanky marino wool, but itchy wool.  Might be too mean!

Categories: Bondage, Ideas

Rope flogger and rope again

March 12, 2009 Leave a comment

I like the idea of a rope flogger but I don’t have much money to spare so I am reluctant to cut my rope apart.  Here I made a flogger with 2 30ft pieces and 1 15ft piece of nylon rope, which come apart easily afterwards.

Rope flogger

Rope flogger

Categories: Ideas, My photos
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started