Me on the News, Again
Posted: June 29, 2007 Filed under: Anecdotes, Milestone, Miscellaneous Leave a comment
This time, it is for a noble cause. And the novel thing is that I am on a Chinese daily.
June 29, 2007 17:55
動力青年隆雪華堂辦活動
(吉隆坡29日訊) 你已登記成為選民嗎?
凡滿21歲的大馬公民,即可登記成為選民,但根據大馬選舉委員會統計,目前還有490萬人尚未登記為選民,其中70%的年齡介于21歲至35歲之間。
國內非政府組織動力青年(Y4C),已與隆雪華堂民權動委員會,聯辦“青年選民登記與教育運動”,宗旨是透過各項運動,呼吁年輕選民參與登記,並喚起年輕選民對于選舉,以及公共生活課題的關注。
青年是社會改變的發動機,因此這項運動的目標,主要是鎖定這群尚未登記的青年,希望通過集體力量,讓年輕人的聲音變得更具意義。
“青年選民登記與教育運動”工委會今日拜訪《中國報》,在交流會發表談話。
首炮活動反應躍踴
出席者包括動力青年召集人李凱倫、協調員蔡依霖、隆雪華堂民權委員會主席謝春榮律師、動力青年義工羅之成、林翠妤和黃瓔琪,他們獲得《中國報》助理新聞編輯張金權接待。
李凱倫說,首炮活動已于本月24日,在吉隆坡蒂蒂旺沙花園成功舉行,反應鼓舞,兩小時內吸引106名新選民登記,這不包括更換地址者。
他指出,“青年選民登記與教育運動”將于本週日(7月1日),在蒂蒂旺沙花園(網球場對面)掀開序幕,選委會兩名官員將到場助陣。
李氏補充,這項運動閉幕禮訂于7月15日,在隆雪華堂盛大舉行,邀請各朝野政黨到場設立櫃台介紹各自的政見,為選民提供諮詢服務。
他說,目前已答應出席的團體,包括巫統女青團、馬華女青年工作坊、尚在接洽者包括民政黨青年團和3個反對黨青年團。
“這項運動設定目標是召集1000人參與,設有表演,現場將派發小冊子(備有中、巫和印三種語文),同時義賣T恤,每件為20令吉。”
| 動力青年選民與教育運動行程表 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 日期 | 時間 | 地點 |
| 7月1日(星期日) | 上午9時至下午2時 | 帝帝旺沙花園(運動序幕) |
| 7月1日(星期日) | 中午12時至下午3時 | 蒂沙文良港 |
| 7月5日(星期四) | 上午11時至下午2時 | 英迪學院 |
| 7月8日(星期日) | 上午9時至下午2時 | 蕉賴 |
| 7月15日(星期日) | 上午9時至下午2時 | 隆雪華堂禮堂(運動閉幕) |
選民登記教育運動
將走進校園招義工
由動力青年(Y4C)和隆雪華堂民權動委員會發動的“青年選民登記與教育運動”,計劃走進校園,號召更多義工參與,成為一項長遠性的播種運動。
動力青年協調員蔡依霖說,續上週在學院舉辦活動后,目前工委會正與與拉曼學院及馬大,接洽合作選民登記與教育活動。
這名理大畢業生表示,除了登記運動,希望召集一批年輕人,帶動更多的年輕學院生加入這項有意義的工作。
“雖然過程難免會碰釘,但我們會勇敢出第一步,向年輕人講解選舉的重要性,並說服他們成為選民。 ”
關注國家政治
隆雪華堂民權委員會主席謝春榮說,通過這項運動激發在象牙塔中的大專生,更關注國家政治,至少不會覺得政治是骯髒的,而是貼近我們的生活,並將相關訊息帶回同學和同鄉好友。
動力青年召集人李凱倫指出,工委會將以新穎有趣的方式,推廣選民登記與教育工作,譬如以小博士形象、戴上帶有玩具款式的眼睛,接觸選民。
他說,工委會總動員,以年輕人接觸年輕人方式,號召同齡的青年朋友,踴躍登記為選民,以履行公民義務和責任。
工委會成員主要由動力青年和民權動委員會組成,另加上部份志願工作者,聯同友族團體加入,組成跨族群的隊伍。
李凱倫說,目前整個組織約有20名活躍成員,義工約30至40人,並通過這項運動,號召100至200人建立起網絡,設定永久網或定期舉動活動,針對各項課題交流和討論 。
任何查詢,可致電或傳真至:動力青年(03-7783 1164)蔡依霖(012-7355 025),或電郵:vling1983@gmail.com
In Defense of the Academically Marginalized
Posted: June 22, 2007 Filed under: Anecdotes, Contention, Education Leave a commentJust yesterday there is this education issue that comes to my mind, sparked by a conversation between my mum and dad at the dining table. My dad (he is a professor at Universiti Malaya) went for an invigilation earlier as an assignment given by his superior to observe how students are being taught in the “last” few classes, “last” being those classes which consists of students who are considered academically inferior in the system.
When he came home, all he bragged about was how terrible the students were, going in and out of the classroom without the teacher’s permission, and how the teacher did not even bother to rectify things and control the situation.
As my dad continues to make fun of these students, my mum, who is a teacher (part of the system), joined him later, as if they were talking about the clowns in a circus.
I didn’t feel good; I was convulsed with that oh-so-familiar rage. Pushing the rewind button, I recalled that I was once an “atrocious” student in the system; I was a deliberate-rebel of the system. I remembered how disappointed I was not being able to take part in a Physics rocket making project just because I did not manifest great grades. I know how it felt like having the desire to move forward and not being able to do so. I simply know how it feels to be considered academically inferior.
I know why we can’t function well, and continue to not function well. We are being segregated.
The educators are doing a fine job, only to those considered “smart”. “Smart” students and “good classes” receive the most attention in school, receive most resources in schools, and have more privilege to participate in all forms of activities to improve themselves. On the other hand those in the “weak classes” are being segregated, and lessons are being taught without any effort to generate improvements from these students. Some “educators” like my parents even make a fool out of them.
To paraphrase the famous adage of “the rich get richer and the poor become poorer”, in the Malaysian education system, the “good” students are better off whilst the “not-so-good” students become worse.
The point I am trying to put forward is that in most education-related publication, there is little effort to bring out the voices from the most important component of an education system – the students. More so from students considered to be academically inferior. It was as if they were such a disgrace to the system that they deserve to be completely isolated from it.
Doctorjob, for instance features articles on course selections, career choices, etc. These might be relevant to those academically superior, but the “other group” has absolutely no reason to read these items. And it is not because they do not care about their future, but because they are not being exposed to a true and complete academic process, which subsequently keeps their passion and true interest hidden and undiscovered. Some internal education fairs in my previous schools are only available to an exclusive group of people (read: those who presumably will go on to higher education and those who are perceived to have sustained interest in studying)
The Star Education, arguably the education publication of the country, meanwhile, focuses more on what the decision makers have to say, as well as some campus insights and school happenings, and never really dissects what really happen in government schools. Perhaps there are a couple or two special reports on these segregated students once in a blue moon, but as far as I am concerned, this group of people is the one that will contribute to the unemployment figures annually, the very group that deserves more attention from the media.
Is it OxBridge, or is it Camford?
Posted: June 20, 2007 Filed under: Anecdotes, Education, Milestone, Miscellaneous 1 CommentMy college has gotten a little cooler recently (that’s Sunway University College).
Just last Saturday, we have an Oxbridge (or Camford) event going on in college. And I was showered with serendipity to discover some volunteer jobs for this event. Students from high schools across Malaysia congregated in college once again, like how merchants from all corners of the globe converged in Malacca in the 15th century.
The OxBridge event, as you would have known from the word “OxBridge”, is all about the two most proverbial elite universities in the United Kingdom – Oxford University and Cambridge University, albeit you would want to call it CamFord if you are from Cambridge and/or uses the Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary.
The event is organized by the Oxford and Cambridge Society of Malaysia, and as its name suggested, it is an alumni association of sort, for ex-graduates of Oxford and Cambridge Universities. Intriguingly, the president of the OxBridge Society of Malaysia is Ms Elizabeth Lee, who is also the Executive Director of Sunway University College, which explains why SyUC has the privilege to host this event.
The event comprises 4 sections, with the first one being an Essay Writing Competition for high school kids, and then there are two workshops: writing and speaking skills, and of course, a campus tour, and finally there is an OXBRIDGE ADMISSION TALK! (in fact this is the only reason I volunteered).
So for the first two events, I was in charge of bringing these group of 30 odd students from SMK Seri Bintang Selatan around the campus. I really enjoyed bringing high school kids around my campus, especially bringing them to the library and the School of Hospitality,Tourism and Leisure Management (SHTLM) floor. You see, our library is *arguably* the biggest among all private colleges in Klang Valley, and in the SHTLM, there is a hotel room, a cafe, and a fine dining restaurant, which I thought was really cool. So, there are actually quite a lot to brag about.
I enjoyed the speaking workshop and the writing workshops. The first was conducted by a famous thespian who actually starred in “Entrapment” (famously known as the movie filmed in the Petronas Twin Towers) along with Sean Connery and Catherine Zeta-Jones. He started his speaking skills workshop with a “song” from My Fair Lady or Pygmalion, and throughout his workshop, I can see that he is indeed a proficient speaker by virtue of being able to secure the interest of the students seated in front of him.
What turned me on, was the writing skills workshop. It was conducted by Mr Mark Disney, an Oxford grad and a British national who now lives in KL and has a Malaysian PR. He founded and owns the Education Quarterly magazine, and he writes extensively on freedom of press, and education system in Malaysia. Not to mention he is extremely vocal about the conduct of western media organizations like the BBC and the CNN.
The writing tips was fairly uninteresting to me, because it was not meant for me after all. And Mr Disney, as a person of burning passion in media and education (just like me!!) constantly digressed to talk about these issues in the midst of his presentation, which I thought was so darn cool. He aptly illustrates the difference and discrepancy of editorial directions of the NST and the Sun, on the human trafficking issue. NST, which is government owned, ran articles on the Malaysian government criticizing the US for ranking her unfavorably in the rankings, while on the very same day, the Sun (which is not owned by government) ran an article about the Malaysia’s unfavorable position in that ranking. In short, the former was a little more of a subjective account of the issue, while the latter was an objective account of the very same issue.
So why the discrepancy in a same issue? Blame it on government’s ownership.
Some issues pertaining to education system raise by Mr Disney resonated so powerfully with me. He touched on several key issues in education, like how the entire flawed system suppresses creativity and innovation, among others.
And being a person who wants to connect with others who think alike, I immediately knew I have to talk to this person. Alas, he left the hall immediately, and my effort was in vain.
Anyhow, no big deal. I managed to find his email address (the world is shrinking, don’t you think so), and emailed him.
The final part was the admission talk. There are two surprises here. First, OxBridge Society of Malaysia managed to get Mr Tony Pua to the hall. And I was like, wow. I longed to meet Mr Tony ever since I came to know the Education Malaysia blog, which he co-authored.
He represented Oxford University and touched on a variety of topics. As underwhelmed the topic might sound (because I’ve heard things like this many times), the very thing that caught me was a sentence out of his own mouth, ” You don’t judge whether you’re good enough or not; you apply and let the university judge you. “, referring to Malaysian students’ reluctance to even submit the application due to the lack of confidence. This is one phrase that I will always remember.
Other than that, he showed quite a lot of pictures. And wow, the campus is really beautiful. Like what I told Hao-Wei, these buildings resemble the castles in fairy tales we read when we were younger, and that I will cry if I am physically there.
Next it is a Cambridge University representative, Mr Alen. It is indeed unfortunate that he did not have the time to complete his presentation due to time constraint. The agenda has to cease to make way for the arrival of a Queen Elizabeth like British lady, whose identity still remain a mystery.
Surprise number two came when I found out that the admission rate for both OxBridge is rather high, as high as 20%, that’s 1 out of 5, compared to an admission rate of only 10% for most elite US schools.
As trite as it might be, it is an exciting and fulfilling day, and I managed to make contact with Mr Mark Disney and Mr Tony Pua.
A Week of Valedictory Encounters (PART 1)
Posted: June 2, 2007 Filed under: Anecdotes, Education, Milestone Leave a commentFirst, it is Physics teacher Mr Anton Gillich.
Then it is a close friend from Iran, Armin.
Now, it is program director/principal a.k.a First Lady Dr. Rosemary Gannon.
And these valedictory encounters happened all within this week.
To begin with, Mr Gillich is leaving for Canada, for he misses home. Jeez, I hate to admit this, but I think I had teary eyes when he made his valedictory speech in class during the last day of the semester.
Thankfully, I did not shed any tears, for I found comfort by telling him how I felt throughout the semester in his Physics class by penning a thank-you letter to him, just before the class ended.
Mr Gillich is a really capricious person. He could be affable today, and could be aloof and obstinate on another day. Also, he could act like a normal layperson today, and turn unorthodox the next day.
Throughout the semester, I thoroughly enjoyed his presence in school. He is witty, funny, and makes Physics less boring, really. Despite swearing occasionally in class (which tends to invite gales of laughter from my classmates and I), his humour is arguably what I will miss most throughout his absence for the next few months. Some of his words that I still remembered vividly was: “For fun and profit, let’s do some problems” (still wondering what “fun and profit” means), and he even used the word “duh” in class.
What I liked about him, however, is that he never failed to explain a topic more explicitly when I (and we) needed explanations. He believes that we all should understand things, not memorize them, which is so freakin‘ felicitously in-line with my article of faith. He even went on to encourage us to ask questions. He firmly believes that learners learn best by asking questions. So, the Physics class will constantly digressed into something else, even something that is not from the text book, which only makes our learning experience more colourful and vibrant.
The explanation part was even more engaging. He actually took the initiative to draw pictures and diagrams on the whiteboard to aid our comprehension (though I must say there is definitely room for improvement in the drawing part). And in the event someone else does not understand, he will not hesitate to explain for the second time, or even the third. Ergo, I think he is being really dedicated to his profession by virtue of such academic experience that he has given me.
(and the dedication showed by Malaysian teachers pales in comparison, I shall add)
Besides hard-core Physics, I also learnt my lesson of respecting other’s intellectual property (albeit the very very hard way) through Mr Gillich. The thing is, I had a big round zero for my very first lab report, for committing the crime called plagiarism.
Pardon my expression, but I must say I despised him for this at one time. Now, thank God I was caught plagiarising in high school, and not in university. I will never cite sources the same way again.
I met him for the very last time today.
“Aaron, thanks for your lovely letter,” was all he said.
At the end of the graduation ceremony, we shook, for one very last time.
That, reignited the divine connection between me and a teacher, a feeling I longed for in the past few years.
And that poignancy will haunt me for the rest of my life.
