I went into Conclave not really knowing what to expect, which is often the best way to read a book. I ended up listening to it as an audiobook, and that turned out to be a great choice. The narration by Roy McMillan was excellent and really suited the tone of the story. This was one of those books where I kept looking for excuses to keep listening.
The novel is set almost entirely within the Vatican, following the death of a pope and the closed-door process of electing his successor. Cardinal Lomeli is tasked with overseeing the conclave, responsible for keeping order and ensuring the rules are followed as the cardinals gather and voting begins. As the days pass, tensions rise, alliances shift, and secrets start to surface. What looks, on the surface, like a solemn and sacred process slowly reveals itself to be far more complicated.
What surprised me most about this book was how compulsive it was. There is very little in the way of obvious action. No chase scenes, no dramatic confrontations. Instead, the tension builds quietly and steadily through character, atmosphere, and the gradual uncovering of what each man wants and what he is willing to hide.
Harris really leans into the reality of religious leadership. There is surprisingly little actual religion in the book. Faith exists, but it often feels secondary to ambition, power, ego, and fear. These are men who are supposed to be spiritual leaders, but they are also ego-driven men in power and that tension makes the whole thing feel unsettlingly real.
The setting adds to that sense of claustrophobia. Locked rooms, whispered conversations, carefully chosen words, and the constant sense that everyone is watching everyone else. By the time the story reaches its conclusion, the pressure has built so effectively that even small moments feel loaded with meaning.
I did not expect to enjoy this as much as I did, but I found it hard to stop. It is smart, tense, and quietly gripping, and the audiobook format only heightened that experience. This was a really satisfying read, especially if you enjoy novels where the drama comes from people, not plot twists or spectacle (although I'm not going to lie, there is a plot twist).
4 stars: for being such a compulsive read.
I picked up Piranesi after hearing it recommended on the ABC Radio National Top 100 Books of the 21st Century countdown, and it turned out to be one of those books that feels quietly special while you are reading it, and then keeps revisiting you afterwards.
The story is told through the journals of Piranesi, who lives in an enormous House made up of endless halls filled with statues. The lower levels flood with the tides, the upper levels are dry and calm, and the House seems to provide everything he needs (albeit not much). There is only one other person in his world, someone he calls the Other, who visits occasionally and is searching for some kind of hidden knowledge. As Piranesi records his days, small details begin to feel off, and gradually you realise that there is much more going on than he understands.
That is about as much as I want to say about the plot, because this really is a book you should discover slowly.
What I loved most about Piranesi was the feeling of it. The world is mysterious and magical, but it also feels incredibly real. Clarke builds it so carefully that you accept it almost without question, even when you do not fully understand how it works. I could see it clearly in my head, and I did not want to leave it.
In a strange way, it reminded me of the stories I used to make up as a child. Those imagined worlds that felt complete and absorbing and totally logical while you were inside them. I think that has a lot to do with Piranesi himself. He moves through his world with such openness and appreciation. He delights in it. He notices things. He is grateful for what he has. That straightforward way of seeing made the book feel both gentle and profound.
The writing is beautiful but very restrained. It never feels like it is trying too hard. The mystery unfolds slowly, and even when the book ends, it feels like there is still more there to think about. I finished it with the sense that I had not fully unpacked everything yet, and I liked that.
I kept wishing I was reading this as part of a book club. It feels like the kind of book that would only get better through conversation, because there is so much in it that could be interpreted and discussed. Power, knowledge, memory, identity, and the stories we tell ourselves.
This is strange, thoughtful, and beautifully made. I really loved it.
I’ve really enjoyed the Thursday Murder Club series. It has been one of those dependable, easy reading comfort series for me, with familiar characters and just enough mystery to keep things moving. I picked up The Impossible Fortune expecting more of the same but this one really let me down.
The story kicks off at Joyce’s daughter’s wedding, which should be a fun starting point. During the celebrations, Elizabeth is quietly approached by a man who claims someone is trying to kill him. From there, the Thursday Murder Club finds itself tangled up in a complicated mystery involving missing money, secret storage facilities, and people who are not quite who they seem. As usual, the group pokes around, asks questions, and follows a trail of clues.
That's the plot but the problem for me was that none of it felt interesting. The mystery itself was boring and instead of building real tension, the book relies heavily on chapters that end with mini cliffhangers. After a while this just became annoying rather than compelling.
By the middle of the book I was already losing interest, and toward the end I was skimming just to see how it would all wrap up. The resolution, when it finally arrived, felt flat and anti-climactic. There was no real sense of surprise or satisfaction, just a feeling that I had spent a lot of time getting to a fairly underwhelming conclusion.
What disappointed me most is that this book felt like a repetition of ideas from earlier in the series without the spark that made those books work. The characters are still likeable, but they are no longer enough to carry the story on their own. Everything started to blur together, and the whole thing felt like much of a muchness.
I did finish it, but more out of obligation than enjoyment. After loving this series for so long, it is a shame to say that this might be where I stop. The Impossible Fortune was not terrible, but it was boring, and that is somehow worse.
If you are a long-time fan, you might still want to read it just to keep up with the characters. But for me, this one confirmed that my time with the Thursday Murder Club may be over.
WWW Wednesday is a meme that is hosted by Taking on a World of Words. It's a very simple premise of sharing with others The Three Ws:
What are you currently reading?
What did you recently finish reading?
What do you think you’ll read next?
What am I currently reading?
I am currently reading The Winter Garden by Kristin Hannah. I really enjoyed The Women last year and have The Nightinglale on my TBR list for this year. Hannah's books are so easy to read - from the moment I start reading them I am engaged and it feels so natural, like I am there with the characters. The Winter Garden is about the relationship between two young girls and their cold mother, as they come to understand more about her and how she came to be the way that she is.
I am also re-reading The Seven Dials Mystery by Agatha Christie ahead of the release of the netflix adaption shortly.
What did I just finish?
What will I read next?
Who knows? Where ever my mood takes me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Books completed | 75 |
| Fiction | 72 |
| Non-fiction | 3 |
| Australian authors | 25 |
| Female authors | 61 |
| Translated fiction | 2 |
| Crime fiction | 39 |
| Re-reads | 21 |
2025 was a steady reading year for me. I returned to familiar voices, found comfort and order in crime fiction, supported Australian authors, and mostly chose books that could live alongside my busy life rather than take me away from it.
- Golden Age crime (Agatha Christie, Dorothy L Sayers, Ngaio March)
- Series detectives (Jacqueline Winspear, Kerry Greenwood, Dervla Tiernan, Robert Galbraith), and
- Contemporary Australian crime (Benajamin Stevenson, Jane Harper, Christopher White, Sulari Gentill).
- Crime (Kerry Greenwood, Jane Harper, Bejamin Stevenson, Sulari Gentill)
- Contemporary fiction (Madeleine Grey)
- Literary fiction (Charlotte Wood, Hannah Kent, Peter Carey)
- Non-fiction / Memoir (Hannah Kent, Helen Garner).
- Han Kang
- Colson Whitehead
- Percival Everett
- Peter Carey
- RF Kuang
- Min Jin Lee
- Ann Patchett
- Claire Keegan
- Small Things Like These
- The Soul of Kindness
- Bel Canto
- Pachinko
- The Women
- Wicked






