anehan: Drunk Lan Wangji (MDZS: Drunk Lan Zhan)
Work is hellish. I worked both Saturday and Sunday on three hours of sleep, I have very little recollection of what I've done since last Thursday, and I literally startle up from sleep thinking about databases. It's bad enough that today my coworker and I sat our team lead and his boss and his boss's boss down and said that our team lead needs to start prioritising things better, because his demands are ridiculous and this can't go on. No, not even when we're trying to deploy the project from hell. Especially not when we're trying to deploy the project from hell.

So, what I've needed have been books by an author I know I can trust and whose writing pulls me in so that I can make it to bedtime with my sanity intact. And you can see below just which author that has been.

Recently read

  • Annick Trent, Oak and Ash (The Old Bridge Inn #3)

    A new-to-me author. Historical M/M romance between a surgeon and a valet. I haven't read the previous parts of the series, but they are standalone enough that it didn't matter. I don't have anything to say, because my brain is kaputt, except that I really liked this.


  • K.J. Charles, the Charm of Magpies series: The Magpie Lord, A Case of Possession, and Flight of Magpies

    The first two parts were re-reads, the last I'd never read. No idea why. Anyway, it had been so long since I'd read this that I'd managed to forget basically everything, so it was all delightfully new to me.


  • K.J. Charles, Spectred Isle

    Another re-read. Another one I'd read so long ago I didn't remember anything.


  • K.J. Charles, All of Us Murderers

    KJC's newest, which was released everywhere yesterday. (I guess UK readers of physical books got theirs last week. Lucky them.) Gothic romance. Finished it yesterday evening, slept a full 8 hours afterwards for the first time in far too long. 5 stars, no notes. Loved it.


Currently reading

K.J. Charles, Any Old Diamonds (Lilywhite Boys #1). A reread, because my brain is still not online.

Up next

Christ, I don't know up from down. How would I know this? Probably more KJC, tbh.
anehan: Li Lianhua from Mysterious Lotus Casebook (MLC: Li Lianhua is detecting)
Recently read

  • Yatsuki Wakatsu, The Other World’s Books Depend on the Bean Counter, Vol. 2: Church Management Support Plan

    The first volume managed to be entertaining, mostly because the relationship dynamic between the MC and the ML was hilarious. Turns out that couldn't carry the series past the first volume. The first volume was bad in an addictive way; this one is just bad. Alas.


  • Cat Sebastian, Hither, Page (Page & Sommers #1)

    Some years ago I tried to read Cat Sebastian's It Takes Two to Tumble and bounced off of it hard enough that I never tried to read anything else by her. Until now. Lately, I've been into historical mystery novels, especially queer historical mystery novels, so I've had my eye on this for a while now. It didn't end up being quite as historical as I thought it would be -- for some reason I thought it'd be post-WWI rather than post-WWII -- but I loved it so much that I think I might be a Cat Sebastian fan now.


  • Cat Sebastian, The Missing Page (Page & Sommers #2)

    That title is so clever it makes me mad.


Currently reading

  • Annick Trent, The Oak and the Ash (The Old Bridge Inn #3)

    Haven't read the previous volumes of this series, but it's stand-alone enough to not matter. Historical M/M romance between a surgeon with radical political ideas and a valet with an interest in meteorology. I'm enjoying this one a lot!
anehan: Tezuka drinking tea (Tenipuri: Tezuka and tea)
Well, it's been a hot minute since I last did a reading roundup, the reason being that for about a month I read nothing but Red, White and Royal Blue fic. There's a lot more of it now than when I last checked. The movie effect in action, perhaps? Anyway, Henry/Alex ftw, even though I cringe every time Henry is called the Prince of Wales. Or a monarch. Or when he's said to abdicate.

Anyway. Books.

Recently read

  • Grace Burrowes, A Gentleman Fallen on Hard Times (The Lord Julian Mysteries #1). Historical sleuthing, with an MC who used to be an intelligence officer in Wellington's army, only to fuck up in a spectacular way. So, on top of having PTSD crowned with some more PTSD, he has to deal with being treated as a traitor by almost everyone who knows anything about him.

    The novel has a really high rating on Goodreads, and IMO it lives up to it. A low-stakes mystery in the sense that there's no murder, but high-stakes in the sense of the effect on the characters and their lives. Highly recommend.


  • Siiri Enoranta, Keuhkopuiden uni, which I read for a queer fantasy book club I recently joined. The cover copy describes this as a "mysterious and intelligent novel, decadent fantasy at its best". I beg to differ. It's a disjointed, confused mess that reads like an early draft. Not without interesting bits, but those don't make up for the utter boredom of slogging through it. It relies heavily on its dreamy, lyrical prose, but I think that if you write a book where stylistic choices are so central, you really need to make sure those choices work. (See my comment about it reading like an early draft.)

    The baffling thing is that it's got very good reviews from critics. It almost seems like it's one of those novels that you have to like because to not like it means you are too plebeian to understand it.


  • Melissa Scott & Amy Griswold, Death by Silver (Julian Lynes and Ned Mathey #1). I really liked Scott's Astreiant series, so obviously I wanted to read her mystery novels. And besides, historical queer mystery novels are right up my alley. This is a solid one, though somehow a bit clumsy at times. Still, I'll definitely read the second book in the series.


Currently reading

Uh, too many WIPs. Should probably pick them up again. It's just that I last read them over a month ago, on account of the fall down the FirstPrince rabbit hole.

Up next

No fucking idea. Finished Death by Silver last night, and now I'm at sea.
anehan: Elizabeth Bennet with the text "sparkling". (Default)
Recently read

  • Lynn Flewelling, Stalking Darkness & Traitor's Moon

    I've already bemoaned the fact that somehow I was totally sleeping on the Nightrunner series, but at least I've found it now. I was also correct when I said that I probably wouldn't be smart enough to take a break from the series after the second part. I did manage to stop myself after the third one, so yay for that! I was starting to feel a bit woozy while reading the third volume -- they are so long that it's easy to get lost in them -- so it seemed like a good point to stop for a while and go read something else for a while.


  • Lois McMaster Bujold, Shards of Honor

    That something else was the Vorkosigan Saga, which I've also been sleeping on. At least I haven't been completely clueless: I've known of its existence for close to 20 years. I've always meant to read it at some point, but for some reason I never got around to it until now. I completely fell in love with Shards of Honor. It was so good that it was a bit surprising to realise it was Bujold's debut.


  • Yatsuki Wakatsu, The Other World’s Books Depend on the Bean Counter, Vol. 1: Holy Maiden Summoning Improvement Plan

    Isekai BL about a workaholic accountant, who is pulled along another person's transmigration trip, and a grumpy knightly commander, who very reluctantly gets invested in the accountant's eating and resting habits (or lack thereof). Reading this sure was an experience. Not a good book by any conceivable metric, but unfortunately highly addictive. I've already bought the second volume, so excuse me while I go cry about my life choices.


Currently reading

  • Yatsuki Wakatsu, The Other World’s Books Depend on the Bean Counter, Vol. 2: Church Management Support Plan

    Ehehe.


  • Aliette de Bodard, The House of Sundering Flames

    One chapter in, and the melodramatic prose is already annoying me. Thuan continues to be a delight, though.


  • Jonathan Dollimore, Sex, Literature, and Censorship

    I definitely don't have the theorical background to understand this, but I shall persevere.


Up next

Bujold's The Warrior's Apprentice, perhaps. Also, volume 5 of Ballad of Sword and Wine just came out.
anehan: Satisfied Atobe (Tenimyu: Atobe - yosha!)
This week I'm starting to really see the effect of being on holiday. My brain is starting to wake up, so not everything needs to be an easy read anymore.

Recently read

  • Mina V. Esquerra, What Kind of Day. DNF at 56%. For some reason I was utterly bored. Also, Naya (the FL) was annoying. Meh.


  • Ginn Hale, Lord of the White Hell: Book 1 & Lord of the White Hell: Book 2. Heavy-handed at times, both in world-building and in characterization, but I enjoyed these nonetheless. Still, by the time I had finished these I was more than ready to leave Kiram behind, so it's a good thing the next part of the series switches protagonists. Yay, more Elezar (bastard though he is).


  • William Marx, The Hatred of Literature. Very much NOT an impartial, dispassionate account.
    If the accusation of immorality leveled at literature is among those that continue to elicit a response and still today serve to justify the banning of various books, it is because this accusation primarily concerns childhood and education and raises the image of readers who are defenseless before the representation of evil ... The ethical judgement an individual is supposed to be able to exercise in a real situation ... is considered to be lacking when that same person is confronted with a literary text: literature apparently deprives the reader of moral autonomy, which is why readers should be emancipated from literary custody.

    I think "which is why readers should be emancipated from literary custody" is my new favourite. Marx is often so delightfully sarcastic.


  • Tero Tähtinen, Kuunkajoa lootuslammella (Moonlight in the Lotus Pond). An essay collection on Chinese literature.


  • Lynn Flewelling, Luck in the Shadows. Queer fantasy from the 90s. Lately, I've found two new-to-me fantasy series from the 90s, both of which first drew me in because of their queer protagonists and both of which I ended up loving for more than that. The first was Melissa Scott's Astreiant series; the second is this, the Nightrunner series.

    Back in the 90s, I was still reading exclusively in Finnish, so books that had no Finnish translation never appeared on my radar. And then, later, I never even heard of either the Astreiant or the Nightrunner series, until very recently. With Astreiant, I saw a couple of recs on Bluesky this spring, but I can't remember how I heard about the Nightrunner. Somehow it just appeared in my want-to-read shelf on Goodreads. It's a mystery. But it begs the question: how many other fantastic older fantasy books am I not reading simply because I've never even heard of them?

    Luck in the Shadows, the first part of the seven-part Nightrunner series, features the swashbuckling adventures of Alec and Seregil, a pair of spies who try to uncover treasonous plots and oppose the rise of old evil, guided by their wise old wizard handler. It's got a very 90s feel, for obvious reasons, which I felt was a draw rather than a deterrent. :D

    The epub file has a lot of errors though: mostly random dots in the middles of sentences, but also missing quotation marks, sentences that start with a lowercase letter, and so on. Sloppy proofreading work, worse than what you'd usually find.


Currently reading

  • Lynn Flewelling, Stalking Darkness, the second part of the Nightrunner series, because I'm hooked.

  • Heli Rantala, et al., Kirjojen kaipuu, a book on book culture in early 19th century Finland. Really interesting so far, especially reading about the way reading and acquiring books was very much a social activity back then, in part because of the difficulty of sourcing books at all here in European periphery.


Up next

I think that, if I were smart, I would read something else than the next part of the Nightrunner series, because these are long books and I've noticed that reading too much of the same thing has diminishing returns on enjoyment. But I'm not sure I'm that smart.
anehan: Tezuka drinking tea (Tenipuri: Tezuka and tea)
Recently read

  • Xue Shan Fei Hu, The Disabled Tyrant's Beloved Pet Fish, vol. 3. Silly and fluffy danmei. It's basically domestic fluff crossed with palace intrigue, except all the intrigue plots are resolved with minimal trouble and everything always works out for the main characters. Conflict level: -500. I don't know that I actually enjoyed reading this, because there was absolutely nothing of substance in it, but I still started vol. 4 right away. I blame the cliffhanger.

    I'll have to start being less of a completionist about danmei, don't I?


  • Xue Shan Fei Hu, The Disabled Tyrant's Beloved Pet Fish, vol. 4. Yeah. I've no excuse.


  • Gu Xue Rou, To Rule in a Turbulent World, vol. 1. Yet more historical danmei. I was pretty sceptical about this one, since the English translation is published by Via Lactea. Also, the translator/editor team is apparently Suika and Pengie, who made something of a mess of the TGCF and MDZS translations. Luckily, the quality of the translation and editing was better than I expected. Maybe nothing to write home about, but at least none of the tableware was tired of life, which was a step up from the TGCF translation.

    But. The fucking epub file, oh my god. Rant incoming.

    Screeching about the epub. Accessibility, goddamit! )

    It wouldn't have been a surprise if I'd just given up. I'm glad I didn't, though, because this was a surprisingly enjoyable read. So much so that I actually read it in one day.

    The MC is a flightly young master from a filthy-rich merchant family who has been sent to the capital to study for the imperial exam and to eventually buy prestige for his family by becoming an official. The ML is a slave from one of the northern nomadic tribes, whose loyalty the MC earns by saving his life. Since the MC is a flighty wastrel at first, he'll naturally have to face some difficulties to grow as a person.

    The prose isn't the most polished, but I liked the characters, and the pace of the novel is good. I also liked the farming, which is probably a weird thing to say about a story where the MC is studying to become a scholar, but there it is. A large part of this volume at least is taken up by restoring an old manor house and making the estate ready for spring planting. I happen to love stuff like that in fiction -- restoring something dilapidated, forging order out chaos, getting deep into the minutiae of a profession or craft -- but if you're bored by endless talk of watermills, then this might not be the book for you.

    Some content warnings to keep in mind should you be someone who would like to avoid these things: age gap relationship (15/22), master/slave relationship.


  • A.J. Demas, Lion & Snake: Series One. Damn. Way to slay me again, Demas. Slow burn, enemies to lovers, arranged marriage, age gap romance in Demas's pseudo-historical setting. Basically tailor-made for me. I have this because I'm subscribed to Demas on Ream. I don't think it's available anywhere else (yet).


Currently reading

Little progress on the old RIPs. Oops.

Up next

More farming in historical China, perhaps?
anehan: Li Lianhua from Mysterious Lotus Casebook (MLC: Li Lianhua is detecting)
Recently read

  • Ginn Hale, Wicked Gentlemen. A collection of two M/M romance novellas following two men from very different walks of life, living in a dystopian setting. It was surprisingly enjoyable. It was very clearly a work of a relatively inexperinced author, but the world-building and the characters more than made up for it (and also for the horrifyingly bad epub file, which, no, I won't shut up about).

    I think the first novella would have benefited from being written in third person rather than first, though. A sentence such as "the moon spread its light across my face and bare chest" would be unfortunate even in third person, but in first person it's just tragic.


  • Lee Welch, Seducing the Sorcerer. An M/M romance in a fantasy setting. The MC, Fenn Todd, is a former groom, current vagabond, who accidentally acquires a flying magical horse, and just as accidentally crashes that horse into the courtyard of the court sorcerer's tower. It's a charming and somewhat whimsical novel, nice enough to read when you just want to relax, but I don't think I'd ever re-read it. It doesn't have enough substance for that. However, kudos to Welch for conveying Fenn's working-class dialect through word choices and syntax rather than non-standard spelling. It worked really well.


  • Priest, Coins of Destiny, vol. 1. If I see "the scion" used as an epithet for a character ever again, it'll be too soon. The scion this, the scion that, time and time again. For fuck's sake.


Currently reading

Too many books.

  • Everina Maxwell, Ocean's Echo. A quarter of the way through. I liked Maxwell's debut, Winter's Orbit. This is set in the same universe, so it's probably no surprise that I'm liking this as well. The first fifth was pretty stressful reading, because it deals with loss of autonomy and being a victim of state injustice, and I don't expect it'll get much less stressful. When I first started this, I totally lost myself in it. Surfaced two hours later, shaky with adrenaline.


  • Xue Shan Fei Hu, The Disabled Tyrant's Beloved Pet Fish, vol. 3, which is just as ridiculous as the name suggests.


  • Plus nine others.


Up next

Let's get through some of the RIPs first, okay?
anehan: Pissed off Atobe (Tenimyu: Atobe - and you can just fuck o)
Recently read

Aliette de Bodard, The House of Shattered Wings & The House of Binding Thorns. I feel like I spent half the reading time arguing with de Bodard's choices, which didn't make for a restful reading experience.

They've got the same problem Shelley Parker-Chan's The Radiant Emperor duology: too many main characters and therefore not enough space to develop those characters, leading to the author leaning too heavily on a single defining characteristic for them. And just like Parker-Chan, de Bodard chose to lean on misery. If "woe is me" were a genre, these books would be picture-perfect examples of it.

You know how sometimes authors switch to a different set of main characters within a series? Freya Marske's The Last Binding series comes to mind; the switch killed any desire I had of continuing past the first volume. Well, in this case, a complete switch would have been a blessing. There's only so many times one can read about someone's spiral of self-castigation and misery before it gets stale, and the best parts of the second book were the parts with the new or less-known characters. (Well, most of them. One set of them was cast in the old mould of melodramatic navel-gazing.)

To be fair, though, I still pretty much inhaled these. Addictive, but frustrating.

Currently reading

Priest, Coins of Destiny vol. 1. A hundred pages in, and not really feeling this yet. Priest appears to be a mixed bag for me. Some of her novels I love (Stars of Chaos, Drowning Sorrows in Raging Fire), others I very much don't (Guardian, and now this one too, apparently).

Ginn Hale, Wicked Gentlemen. This one, on the other hand, is keeping my attention, though it suffers from having the worst epub file I have ever seen. It's so messed up that I actually opened it up to see whether I could fix it easily. Alas, I would've pretty much had to redo the whole thing. It was an unholy mess, which isn't surprising, I suppose, given that it's apparently been exported straight from a bloody Word document. Holy fuck.

Up next

I've bought the sequel to The House of Shattered Wings and The House of Binding Thorns, so maybe that one. Or maybe I need more of a break from this series. We'll see.

Only two more days until my summer holiday, so I will have plenty of time to read then, even if I spend twice as long on a novel than I would normally do on account of all the ranting.
anehan: Zhou Zishu during his Tian Chuang days. (WoH: ZZS - Tian Chuang)
Recently read

Two books finished.

Ferdia Lennon's Glorious Exploits was excellent, though I don't think it was actually that funny. Possibly people find it funny because of the juxtaposition between the setting (ancient Syracuse) and the modern vibe of the language used by the narrator? Fair enough; the narration is a bit humorous. Still, it didn't bother me that I didn't find it funny, on account of how I'm not a fan of humorous books in the first place.

Remember how I said last week that there are two danmei series that I want to read ASAP when new volumes are released? Priest's Drowning Sorrows in Raging Fire just became the third. I inhaled the first volume.

Currently reading

I'm almost finished with Aliette de Bodard's The House of Shattered Wings.

Up next

Maybe the sequels to The House of Shattered Wings, maybe some more danmei by Priest. I've also got Eliot Schrefer's The Brightness Between Us in my TBR pile.
anehan: Xiao Se from The Blood of Youth (The Blood of Youth: Xiao Se is refined)
I appear to have read a bunch of danmei lately.

Legend of Exorcism vol. 1 by Fei Tian Ye Xiang
A bit meh about this. Nothing wrong with it, it's just not my cup of tea. It appears to be going in the direction of found family, so this might be a good fit for people who like that trope. It's not particularly a draw for me, which might explain my lukewarm reaction. Still, I'll probably read the next volume, too.

Ballad of Sword and Wine vol. 4 by Tang Jiu Qing
There are two ongoing danmei series where I always read the latest English release as soon as I can. This is one of them. I like military and court intrigue, and this one delivers.

Peerless vol. 4 by Meng Xi Shi
And this is the other series I always want to read ASAP. Also a plot-driven one with plenty of political intrigue, though this one is more focused on the mystery aspect -- figuring out what's going on with all these rebellious plots -- whereas Ballad of Sword and Wine has the main characters themselves right in the middle of all the plotting and rebelling.

How to Survive as Villain vol. 2 by Yi Yi Yi Yi
This novel has about as much dramatic tension as a worn-out rubber band. This is a transmigration novel that leans quite heavily into a kind of absurd humour which, you probably guessed it, is not my thing. By the end of vol. 1 I thought it was moving towards more serious direction. You know, "character transmigrates into a novel, treats is as a bit of a game, eventually realises that these people are real, things get more serious". Well, it didn't happen. Within a few chapters, vol. 2 was back to the silliness. Pleasant enough reading when you just want to hang your brain out to dry and relax, though. And luckily only three volumes long.

In addition to all the danmei, I also finished this:

He Who Drowned the World by Shelley Parker-Chan
This is the second part of the Radiant Emperor duology, the first one being She Who Became the Sun. I have conflicted feelings about this. On the one hand, Parker-Chan created some very interesting characters in the first part of the series. On the other hand, I think having so many major characters and trying to follow them all and tie them to the plot is also its weakness, which became clear in this second part of the series. There isn't space to devote enough time to them (except maybe Zhu Chongba, who I unfortunately find the least interesting), so they are rather two-dimensional. It's tragic character after tragic character after tragic character, which becomes a bit repetitive.

Also, to me the most interesting relationships and the ones with the most interpersonal tension were the ones that revolved around Esen-Temur. (Warning: major spoilers for She Who Became the Sun follow.) Highlight for spoilers! *And then Esen-Temur died in the first book. To me, it was the most emotionally satisfying moment in the whole book. I thought the build-up and the resolution to the story-arc was really well written. But without Esen-Temur, much of the interpersonal conflict that drove Ouyang and Wang Baoxiang lost its dynamism and became stagnant. They felt the after-effects, to be sure, and it was those after-effects that drove them in this second book. I just don't think they were enough to carry these characters.*

There were good parts in this book too, sure -- I really liked the story arc with Wang Baoxiang and the Third Prince -- but IMO they weren't quite enough. YMMV.

With books like these, I often keep thinking about the things they didn't do well, and that is reflected here as well. That gives a distorted view of the books. Makes it seem like I think less of them than I do. And yet the reason I keep thinking about the weaknesses is because books like these are interesting enough to hold my attention. Mediocrity doesn't do that.

So, let me state this: even though it didn't quite live up to its potential, I thought this was an interesting book and a good debut series. I look forward to seeing what Parker-Chan does next.
anehan: Elizabeth Bennet with the text "sparkling". (Default)
Crossposted to booknook.

Title: Censored: A Literary History of Subversion and Control
Authors: Matthew Fellion and Katherine Inglis
Genre: non-fiction

As a consequence of realising that hey, interlibrary loans exist and are actually pretty cheap, I've been reading a book called Censored: A Literary History of Subversion and Control by Matthew Fellion and Katherine Inglis.

The book is a survey of the history of censorship of literature mainly in the UK and the US, presented through case studies of individual censored works, though many of the chapters discuss censorship of similar books more broadly. The oldest case is the censorship of the early English translations of the Bible; the newest the censorship of Chicanx literature in Arizona in the 2010s.

The book takes a broad view of censorship. It doesn't just deal with censorship by the state, but also other forms of censorship, such as self-censorship and the chilling effect that censorship exerts on the literary landscape as a whole.

I'm not going to talk about it in any great detail. It's really well-written -- very accessible to a lay reader, without feeling like it's been dumbed-down -- so go read it if the topic interests you.

Some thoughts on censorship of literature based on this book )
anehan: Tang Lian from The Blood of Youth (The Blood of Youth: Tang Lian salutes)
I'll Have What He's Having by Adib Khorram
M/M romance. DNF'd in chapter 7. No complaints about the plot, the setting, the characters, etc. The reason for the DNF was the amateurish writing. It's got infodumping, characterisation with a capital C, cringy sex. I felt like I was reading Khorram's daydream about what a cool life would be like. And the frustrating thing is that I think all of these issues were solvable with the help of a good editor. As it is, it's not worth bothering with.

The Darkness Outside Us by Eliot Schrefer
This, on the other hand, is extremely worth bothering with, because it's fantastic. Sci-fi mystery/thriller, with a smattering of M/M romance. I recommend not spoiling yourself for the plot twist beforehand, though from experience I can say that even if you do get spoiled, it's still worth reading.

A Drop of Corruption by Robert Jackson Bennett
The second book in the Shadow of the Leviathan series, and just as good as the first. Mystery with thoughtful depictions of power, responsibility, and the danger of good intentions.

The Game of Kings by Dorothy Dunnett
DNF'd at 16%. This isn't so much an anti-rec as it is a warning, because I think The Game of Kings really requires you to have a better grasp of British history -- especially the Anglo-Scottish Wars -- than I do. It assumes you have a lot of background knowledge about the people and the events, and if you don't, it's often dull reading. It might have got more interesting later on, but there are too many books I really want to read for me to bother finding out.

Kreutzer Sonata by Leo Tolstoy
As far as I can remember, the only work by a Russian author that I'd ever read before this was a short story by Anton Chekhov, which we had to read at school. The reason I picked Kreuzer Sonata up was because I was going to see a ballet based on it soon after, and I'm glad I did. It deals with domestic violence, and yet it's a surprisingly easy read. Anyway, I've now read both a short story and a novella by a famous Russian author. What's next, a whole novel?

(The ballet was good, too, though I think the choreographer had mostly missed the point of the novella.)
anehan: Text: "Ooo shiny!" (Text: Shiny!)
I'm jumping onto the bandwagon of reccing books that actually exist (unlike these). This is a quick-and-dirty list of books that'll let you sit back and relax if you, like me, are still a ways away from summer vacation.

The Tainted Cup by Robert Jackson Bennett
My most recently finished read, and one I recommended to my dad when he was lamenting the lack of old-school detective work in contemporary detective novels. Holmes and Watson in a fantasy setting.

Wizard of the Crow by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o
It's true that this book is about dictatorships, and it's true that it's about the lasting effects of colonialism, but it's so utterly hilarious and brilliant that it absolutely counts as a sit-back-and-relax book. How is it possible for a book so full of utterly despicable people to be so enjoyable? Kudos for achieving that!

The Astreiant series by Melissa Scott
Very enjoyable low fantasy series about a proto-police officer and his soldier boyfriend, especially if you like to read about ordinary people working ordinary jobs in a historical or pseudo-historical setting. Not quite as insightful about structures of power as the previous two, but it does try.

The Element of Fire by Martha Wells
People usually rec The Death of the Necromancer, and it definitely is a technically better novel, but I've got a soft spot for this one. This is Wells's debut, a swashbuckling adventure with magic and some truly terrific characters, including the MC, Thomas Boniface, and his ex, Queen Ravenna. I wasn't convinced by the developing romance, but other than that I enjoyed it a lot.

Think of England by KJ Charles
This is an older one by Charles, and solid KJ Charles quality. Featuring an upright British gentleman, a decadent Jewish poet, and dastardly plots in a country house. I've read it at least three times by now. Archie Curtis and Daniel da Silva are perhaps my favourite Charles couple.
anehan: Atobe Keigo with text "still number one" (Tenimyu: Atobe - number one)
I managed to shrink my one handknit lightweight beanie. Accidentally washed it in 40 degrees rather than 30. Farewell, beanie.

I dug up some leftover yarn I had from knitting a sweater this past winter: 1.5 skeins of Knitting for Olive Merino, which I figured would probably be enough for an adult beanie in size large. Possibly even one with a turned up brim. The colour is called Trenchcoat, which is a very trenchcoat-y colour. Probably not my favourite, but it grew on me as I was knitting the sweater, especially as the silk mohair I paired it with gave it more shine and depth.

Since the decision to cast on this beanie now rather than later was a last-minute one as I was preparing to flee renovations, I packed my supplies in a hurry. I was planning to try a top-down beanie pattern, so I packed a long cable for magic loop. What I didn't pack was a 40-centimetre cable. Either of them, because I have two. At home. Where I am not.

Alas, knitting the crown went a lot faster than I thought, even with my knitting pace of "snail chilling on a leaf", so now I have a beanie WIP that could fit onto short circulars, but no short circulars, and a week of my exile left.

Do I
a) keep going with magic loop (hate it, thanks),
b) switch to knitting my sock WIP (don't wanna), or
c) go buy a new cable (waste of money)?

Decisions, decisions.
anehan: Mr Collins, with the text "WTF?" (P&P: Mr Collins -- WTF?)
When I was in high-school, I took an elective course in history where we had to write an essay on a topic of our choosing. I was going through a phase where I was fascinated by monasticism, so I proposed to write mine on that.

With the help of my teacher, I narrowed the topic down to an overview of male Catholic monastic orders in Western Europe. That seemed like a narrow enough topic that I wouldn't be overwhelmed by it while at the same time being broad enough that I could find source material in our small-town library.

Alas, I was so, so wrong. It was a struggle to find anything longer than a few paragraphs' worth of source material. At times, I thought I couldn't do it. If I tell you that one of my best sources ended up being an older encyclopaedia, that might tell you something of how dire the situation was. I did eventually manage to write my ten pages.

I was reminded of that a while ago when I was looking for some books on the history of something-I-can't-even-remember-any-more. The topic, whatever it was, was specific enough that I had basically no hope of finding anything in the city library. I'd have to go to the university library, which shouldn't have been a problem, since university libraries are public libraries. Anyone can get a library card there and borrow from the general collections.

The electronic collections are reserved for the staff and students, though, and that was what put a stop to my quest. The books I wanted were available, yes, but they were available only as ebooks.

It used to be that only scholarly articles were inaccessible because of this, but it appears that universities are increasingly choosing to subscribe to ebook services rather than buying physical copies of books. At least that's what it seems like to me, since I've actually run into this issue several times by now.

A world of knowledge at our fingertips, but we can't get to it. At least I can't. Back in the early 2000s, it was because I lived at the arse-end of the world. Now, it's because I live at the arse-end of the academic world, for all that the university is a few kilometres away.

I love ebooks. I buy a lot of ebooks myself because they are cheaper than physical books (so I can buy more of them), easier to get here in the relative periphery of the world, and more accesible to someone like me who suffers from chronic pain.

But I don't like restricting scholarly sources only to formal members of the academic community. We've already had far too much of that.
anehan: Elizabeth Bennet with the text "sparkling". (Default)
I read J.M.Coetzee's Disgrace in January. I had tried it once before, so I knew going in that I would dislike it. If Coetzee had set out to write a novel designed to make me froth at the mouth, he couldn't have done much better. It infuriates me enough to get me to finally break my renovations-induced social media break.

Spoilers ahoy. (Also, CW for rape.)

The protagonist of Disgrace is David Lurie, a middle-aged professor at a South African university, where he teaches a subject he feels is beneath him. When he's not teaching, he's avoiding writing a chamber opera about Byron, having sex with younger women, and generally being an ass. He pressures his student, Melanie Isaacs, into having "an affair" with him. (The reason for the quotes will become clear soon.) When caught, he refuses to show regret, loses his job, and decides to go visit his daughter Lucy.

Things happen, Lucy gets raped, David is incensed (oh, the irony), yadda yadda, something something, the end. It's mostly a technically proficient novel, though the prose can get curiously purple at times. I think it's all style and no substance, though. It fails, IMO, because Coetzee doesn't have a good enough understanding of sexual violence to be writing a book that centers on sexual violence.

As you can see, I don't think much of it. It's a book that tries so hard to shock that its shock-value seems to be its main purpose.

However, the most infuriating thing about Disgrace is not Disgrace itself. It's the blurb. The edition I read said:

"David Lurie ... has an impulsive affair with a student. The affair sours; he is denounced and summoned before a committee of inquiry."

That's utter horseshit. David Lurie doesn't have an affair with Melanie Isaacs. David Lurie does a Neil Gaiman and pressures his student into having sex with him. At least one of their sexual encounters is outright rape, for all that David calls it "[n]ot rape, not quite that, but undesired nevertheless, undesired to the core." (Chapter 3)

In that scene, Melanie outright tells him no and struggles against him, but he forces himself on her anyway. In all the scenes, Melanie is clearly a reluctant participant. David stalks her and deliberately takes her by surprise so that she won't be able to find the words to say no. And Melanie, predictably, starts cutting class and avoiding David right after their first sexual encounter.

And this is what the publisher chose to describe as an affair gone sour. What the everloving fuck?

Disgrace revolves around rapes both brutal and more subtle, yes, but it also revolves around rape and sexual violence on a meta level, at least in my mind. I spent the whole book wondering if Coetzee realises he wrote David Lurie as a rapist. Half the time I thought he couldn't possibly have written the book the way he did without understanding that, but the other half I thought that no, maybe he really doesn't understand.

Disgrace draws attention to the ways people like David Lurie get away with rape. The men who raped Lucy get away, too, though I think that's probably the part where Coetzee comments on modern South African history and which therefore I have zero competence to comment on myself. But the way Lurie gets away with rape is the way men like him get away with rape everywhere: by doing it (mostly) by coercion rather than physical violence and by being in a position of authority. By being powerful. After all, the only reason Lurie loses his job is because he refuses to pay lip service to the concept of regret.

So does Coetzee realise Lurie is a rapist? I'm not sure, but there'd be plenty of people who wouldn't call him that. Coetzee's publisher certainly didn't.
anehan: Wang Yan from A League of Nobleman (A League of Nobleman: Mowen)
I've been thinking about diversifying my reading for a while now. I've been thinking about what I want to read, what I'm reading now, and what more diverse reading might mean for me. I've also been thinking about what diverse reading is not for me.

Books-wise, I exist in an English language bubble. I mostly read in English, I mostly talk about books in English, and the new books I hear about are mostly published in English.

This bubble is not just an English-language one, but also one that is culturally Anglo-American. Even though many of the people I interact with online speak English as a second or foreign language and come from countries that are not Anglo-American, we use English as our lingua franca, and so the books we talk about and the books we hear about are mostly English-language ones. And as I'm sure we all know, in the English language publishing world, books originally written in a language other than English are a drop in the ocean.

I was thinking about this as I was making my 2024 reading roundup. The fact is, my reading list is a lot of the same, which on the whole doesn't bother me -- I read for fun and I have my preferences -- but I would still like to read more diversely.

However, the perspective I have into diverse reading has become rather Anglo-American. Even, to be more accurate, very US-American. Given this bubble I exist in, that's understandable, but I don't think it's useful for me to think about diverse reading from an American perspective.

American culture is pretty insular. Letting myself approach diverse reading with an American perspective would mean I would adopt that insularity myself. That would be pretty tragicomic for a non-American. And yet, because I've got myself into this literary bubble, it'd be really easy to do so.

So let this be a reminder to myself: I'm not an American, and diverse reading from my perspective is likely to be very different than diverse reading from an American perspective. For one, for an American reader, reading books in translation might well be the biggest step in diversifying their reading, whereas I've been reading books in translation ever since I learned how to read.
anehan: Snowflake. (DW: Snowflake challenge)
I don't much like goals. Or rather, I don't much like public goals. I don't find them motivating, and I haven't noticed them making me Do The Thing more. The opposite, really.

A fantastic start to a Snowflake challenge post that should be about setting goals for the year. :D

I have signed up for two challenges this year, though: the Fannish 50 challenge, for which I chose the topic "50 thoughts about books", and the Goodreads Reading Challenge, which I do just so that Goodreads will display my read count on the frontpage.

I have deliberately made them very easy to achieve. I set my reading challenge goal as 30 books, so that I can reach it easily and then bask in the feeling of a job well done. My Fannish 50 topic is also loose enough that even this post counts.

Perhaps this year I'll stop listing my "Currently Reading" books on Goodreads. It makes me feel pressured to read them, which isn't conducive to me actually reading them.
anehan: Drawing of an apple core with text "Tempted. Tasted. Loved it." (GO: Tempted. Tasted. Loved it.)
I sauntered vaguely downwards before finally falling for good:

  • In the mid-90s, the BBC Pride and Prejudice miniseries airs in Finland. I love it.

  • A few years later, it airs again. I still love it, so I read all of Austen in Finnish.

  • At the end of year 2 of high school, my English teacher tells us to read a novel in English. I read Pride and Prejudice, understand maybe half of it, and love it even more than the Finnish translation.

  • A year later, I'm a university student. My chronic pain is getting worse and worse, so I end up spending a lot of time online. I find a site called The Republic of Pemberley, where I mostly just lurk.

  • A year after that, the 5th Harry Potter book is about to be released, and Pemberley sets up a temporary space for HP fans to discuss it. I dive into the discussions.

  • At the same time, I find The Draco Trilogy. I read it. I like the slashiness of the Harry & Draco friendship, though at that time I don't yet understand that.

  • I find Hermione/Snape fic, and read those for a while, until one of them has Harry/Draco as a side pairing.

  • I go looking for more Harry/Draco, and fall head-first into slash fandom. I haven't surfaced yet.
anehan: "It's Tchaikovsky's Another One Bites the Dust" (GO: Another one bites the dust)
I'm not a monogamous reader by any means. I usually have half a dozen books in progress, some of which may languish months in the RIP pile. And yet, I almost always feel an internal pressure to finish reading books fast. I also feel like I shouldn't have too many reads-in-progress.

Which inevitably leads me to stalling on all my non-fic reading, if my RIPs aren't keeping my interest at that particular moment. -_-

I've been reading Alastalon salissa by Volter Kilpi, which is famous and famously difficult. Everyone knows it, critics praise it, and no one reads it. It's a stream-of-consciousness novel, an 800-page doorstopper that takes place over the course of a six-hour period in the titular parlour of Alastalo, where the local well-off men have gathered to discuss building a barque ship.

There isn't much discussion about the barque in the book. Instead, the characters think about: choosing a pipe, the best ratio of water to rum in a hot toddy, the necessity of building their own parlour a foot longer than Alastalo's, and other such fascinating topics.

Alastalon salissa is not suited for fast reading, as I discovered when I tried to read it fast. I only started to enjoy reading it when I started reading it in much shorter chunks. It doesn't matter if you set it aside for three months and forget everything that has happened, because nothing has actually happened. It doesn't even matter if you forget what it said on the previous page as you read it, because there would have been nothing there to remember.

Reading Alastalon salissa is about appreciating the rhythm and the descriptiveness of the language and the -- frankly hilarious -- characters. It's best when it's savoured, not gobbled.

Tl;dr: Each book has its own pace, and not all books should be read and finished fast.

Profile

anehan: Elizabeth Bennet with the text "sparkling". (Default)
anehan

October 2025

M T W T F S S
   12345
67 89101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 20:44
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios