Langdon Cook to Speak about Salmon

salmon

Hi all,

iuWe’re happy to announce that Langdon Cook — writer, instructor and lecturer on wild foods and the outdoors — will be visiting the University of Puget Sound again in the near future. On his last visit to campus, he talked to the students in SOAN 117: The Anthropology of Food and Eating, about his highly regarded book The Mushroom Hunters. Thanks to support from the McIntyre Seminar Series, on his return to campus he’ll be talking about his new book Upstream: Searching for Wild Salmon, from River to Table. If you’re interested in fish, food, gathering, gleaning, environment, and/or the PNW, you’ll definitely want to come have a listen.

We hope you can join us! Here are the details:

Title: Fish Tales: A Writer’s Journey into the Salmon Connection
Details: Wednesday, November 13 @ 4:00 PM, McIntyre 309

Andrew

Ana Siegel’s AHSS Summer Research Project

Hello again,

As noted in multiple previous posts, students at the University of Puget Sound can compete for funding to support their summer research endeavors. Our department’s students were particularly successful in past years, and again this year we’ve had numerous proposals successfully funded. In short, the AHSS Summer Research Awards, varying from $3250 to $3750, allow students to pursue an in-depth research project over the summer months. I’ve asked each of this year’s batch of students to tell us a little bit about what they’ll be doing with their time, energy, and grant monies in the coming summer. Here’s what Ana Siegel had to say about her new project:

23659520_1555458447880198_6005133534512447888_n

Ana Siegel perched on the remnants of the Glines Canyon Dam on the Elwha River.

Though initially overlooked by Euro-American settlers as an arid wasteland, the Four Corners region of the American Southwest has historically been held sacred to countless stakeholders, specifically those with a pro-conservation stance. Many of the region’s indigenous groups—including the Navajo, Hopi, Zuni, Ute Mountain Ute, Uinta, and the Ouray Ute—attribute immense cultural significance to the land, as many of their traditional territories, reservations, and sources of cultural heritage lie in the region. For outdoor recreants, the region is a haven for climbing and trekking; for locals, the land has been used for generations of cattle grazing. Yet, in the last hundred-or-so years, the Four Corners region has been recognized for its natural resource extraction potential, as it is rich in uranium, vanadium, oil, and coal deposits. As a result of the conflicting cultural and economic interests, this region has often been played as a battlefield between contesting groups, toiled over by those who wish to either capitalize upon, or to protect those assets. Bears Ears National Monument is one such landmark, of which has recently come to the forefront of this familiar quarrel. After years of advocacy and petitioning of the federal government, in 2016, the Obama Administration placed Bears Ears under federal protection, by means of the Antiquities Act. But, on December 4, 2017, President Donald Trump made the executive decision to drastically reduce the land protected by Bears Ears National Monument, by 85%. Paired with the simultaneous reduction of Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument, this ruling was “the largest rollback of federal land protection in the nation’s history” (Turkewitz 2017).  

There seems to be a vast disconnect between the understandings and interests of the seemingly-economically-driven decision-makers, and those of the pro-conservation stakeholders; my research will bridge that disconnect by not only drawing attention to, but also making more legible, the narratives of those pro-conservation stakeholders. With this disconnect in mind, the aim of my research is to explore the ways the shifting status, and resulting vulnerability, of Bears Ears has affected the relationship–the sense of place–that connects pro-conservation stakeholders–such as the region’s indigenous groups, environmentalists, outdoor recreants, and locals–to this landmark of the Four Corners region. 

Over the course of the summer, I will be spending time conducting fieldwork in Southeastern Utah; I will be working alongside pro-conservation stakeholders, using varying qualitative ethnographic research methods—conducting semi-structured interviews, engaging in participant observation, as well as organizing transect walks—to explore the ways in which these stakeholders’ relationships are shifting along with the shifting status of the National Monument.The ultimate goal of this research coincides with the fields of public and applied anthropology: I intend to both highlight and amplify these voices by creating a platform, that will be legible to the public and policymakers, through which pro-conservation stakeholders can vocalize their resistance to the reduction, as well as elucidate the reasoning behind their impassioned campaign to protect Bears Ears.​

We’re so excited for you, Ana, and can’t wait to see how your research develops once you get to Moab. We’ll look for an update from you in a few months!

Andrew

Elizabeth Marks’ Senior Thesis Project

[Seniors in the SOAN department have the opportunity of pursuing a field-based research project that culminates in a senior thesis. I’ve asked our seniors to briefly describe the research project they are beginning to configure for fieldwork in the remainder of our academic year.]
In the spring of my freshman year, I had an incredible opportunity to see William Cronon, a renowned environmental historian, speak on campus. At the time I had been wrestling with the decision of whether or not to pair my SOAN major with an additional major in environmental policy. However, after listening to Cronon speak about the ways in which culture is largely responsible for shaping our perception of the human-nature relationship, my mind had been made up for me. Since then, “The Trouble with Wilderness,” an essay of Cronon’s, has become the enduring foundation of both my anthropological and environmental interests. In this essay, Cronon discusses the way in which American culture has created a false duality between humans and nonhuman IMG_2648nature, making it especially difficult to create and instill environmental ethics and policies that allow humans to coexist sustainably with the environment. It is this complex question of the influence of culture on our attitudes about the environment that I plan to explore in my senior thesis project.
More specifically, I am planning to take a comparative approach to this question by examining two different dimensions of American culture: the urban and rural. Currently, the majority of rhetoric surrounding environmental concerns and sustainability stems from urban areas and so too does environmental policy. The paradox inherent in this is that those in rural areas tend to be in more direct contact with nonhuman landscapes and, I hypothesize, may engage with them and think about them in different ways. Therefore, through the course of my research I am hoping to explore how ideas and rhetoric about the environment vary between urban and rural communities.
While I am still in the process of shaping my research design, I plan to speak with individuals from around the northwest who have lived primarily in one of two locales, either urban or rural. I am hoping to discern, through interviews, what environmental attitudes and experiences these individuals hold and how they compare between the two dimensions, as well as the factors and forces that have shaped these attitudes. I am also hoping to research the environmental policies that are in effect in the northwest and assess whether or not, and to what extent, rural and urban perspectives each seem to be represented. I believe this is an especially important topic of study because it seeks to clarify how our intellectual and regulatory approaches to environmentalism may impact different socio-cultural groups and to assess how we might adjust these approaches in order to make them more widely representative of all perspectives and ultimately more effective.