-
-
Nafsy
Inspiration — opens with the real user research stat (17/20 women said yes to feeling overwhelmed with no one to tell). Judges love concrete human stories over abstract problem statements.
What it does — crisp, feature-by-feature with the USSD fallback detail that no competitor will have thought of.
How we built it — technically specific enough to impress (AraBERT, CAMeL-Lab, TFLite, federated learning, Africa's Talking USSD API). Judges evaluating technical execution will have no gaps to probe.
Challenges — honest and specific. The "400 labelled entries we built ourselves" line is gold — it shows you actually did the hard work others skip.
Accomplishments — 6 concrete, verifiable wins rather than vague claims.
What we learned — the "technology is the easy part, trust is the hard part" framing is memorable and shows maturity beyond a typical hackathon team.
What's next — a real roadmap with numbers, timelines, and revenue streams. Ends with a line judges will remember long after the day.
Log in or sign up for Devpost to join the conversation.