Skip to main content

The technology works. 
The story doesn't.

Image

The technology works.
The story doesn't.

[ 01 SIGNAL ]

Most companies building complex technology can explain what they do.
Fewer can make anyone feel why it matters.

The explanation is fluent — the team is credible, the market is real. But somewhere between what's been built and what the world believes, the signal breaks down.

The usual response is to hire a brand agency. Compress everything into a tagline. Redesign the website. Shoot a launch film. It helps for a month. Then the same problem returns — because the problem was never the surface. It was the structure underneath.

When the investor narrative says one thing, the customer story says another, and the careers page says a third, that's not a communications problem. It's a coherence problem. No amount of polish fixes architecture. The tagline doesn't hold because there's nothing underneath it to hold.

What's missing is narrative architecture — the structural logic underneath how a company explains itself. Not a deck. Not a brand book no one opens after launch week. Decision-grade narratives your team can actually move on.

[ 02 PROTOCOLS ]

Diagnose

MAP

£3,000

48 hours

Strategic diagnosis within 48 hours. We audit your existing narrative, identify where coherence breaks down, and deliver three actionable routes forward.

Start here

Architect

ARC

£25,000–60,000

4–6 weeks

Full narrative package. Origin story, positioning framework, voice system, and a flagship artifact your team can scale from.

Steward

ADV

£8,000–15,000

per month · 3-month minimum

Ongoing creative direction. Strategic counsel, artifact development, and narrative coherence as you scale.

[ 03 ARTIFACTS ]

[ 04 AXIOMS ]

01

The average is common, not correct.

Best practices are floor, not ceiling. We optimize for distinctiveness.

02

Conviction over consensus.

We take positions. Hedged recommendations help no one.

03

We work on what matters.

Climate, infrastructure, deeptech, advanced materials. Problems worth solving.

[ 05 ORIGIN ]

Han

Han

Eight years across architecture, new media art, creative technology, and brand strategy — most recently three years inside Lotus Cars during their EV transformation. Each domain contributed a different fluency. Architecture: spatial narrative and systems thinking. New media art: technical decisions as conceptual carriers. Production: delivery under compression. Lotus: what happens when positioning meets reality at scale — where strategy breaks down, where execution reveals gaps, where the story is built or lost.

The throughline is translation. Making complex ideas tangible for audiences who experience before they analyse. The interesting problems live where established disciplines fail to reach — and "disciplinary homeless" describes someone who carries enough fluency across boundaries to work in those gaps rather than around them.

Follow on LinkedIn