The Name of the Wind (2007), by Patrick Rothfuss

Image

The models who make most on OnlyFans are not the most beautiful, not the most extravagant, not the most brave, not the most hardworking and not the most empathetic.

It is not the people who expose themselves in the best way, but rather people who promise to expose themselves at some later date, but never actually do it.

  1. I read this book because it spotted a recommendation in my Telegram feed.
  2. I looked at the reviews, found them very good, and even claiming that Rothfuss is the next George Martin.
  3. Even though I have given up reading fantasy, I still feel a desire to read modern literature, so I decided to give it a shot.
  4. Overall, I am not impressed, but more disheartened than offended. The book is not good, but it is more of a sign of our age of decadence rather than the sign of the author lacking skill.
  1. The book is an epitome of OnlyFans. Always promise, never deliver.
  2. The book is very well written.
    1. There is a nice has a very nice narrative frame of the narrator telling us his story by himself.
    2. It also has great colourful language. Author’s literary skill is good.
    3. The author can create suspense, and sometimes even resolve it correctly.
  3. The plot is extremely underwhelming.
    1. I started reading the book with enthusiasm: it has a nice beginning, the story has a nice sweet beginning emotionally similar Shire in JRRT’s works.
    2. When I read until 30%, some strange suspicions started to crawl into my brain: when is the main plot going to start?
    3. About 50% of the book is about the “University”. What, you are trying to sell me another “Harry Potter”? Really? Really! It even plagiarises “duels”.
    4. The actual advancement of the plot happens about… 80% into the book? Basically 80% of the book are just a long and boring introduction with a few entertaining bits.
    5. The main event of the book is the main hero killing a harmless giant endangered 200y.o. herbivore lizard, which he himself provokes into delirium.
      Dostoevsky could have enjoyed this, but he was writing 200 years ago.
  4. The plot is full of holes.
    “People do not behave like this”
    1. Money is the biggest driving motive for the protagonist.
      1. I am not sure this is the author’s hidden Marxist tendencies, or maybe he is just reflecting his experience of an American university campus, but overall none of it makes sense.
      2. He spends three years as a pauper, even though he could have been making money by singing and making music.
      3. He works on three jobs during the university, and still manages to be poor.
      4. The “patronage” system for musicians he is describing just make 0 sense whatsoever.
      5. The author confused with how much something costs all literally all the time.
      6. When the protagonist needs money, they still magically appear out of nowhere.
      7. On the other hand, each time he has enough money to pay off his debts, there is a grand piano in the bushes, and magically he is broke again.
      8. He works 5 days a week as a musician in a bar, only for a bed and meal, but still refuses to go back to the dormitory?
        Unbelievable.
    2. His relationships with women are just laughable. Nobody but American university freshmen in 2025 behave like this. Certainly not semi-medieval citizens.
      1. Especially his “love”, Denna, who behaves like a sugar babe from 2025 rather than a medieval minstrel (who she purportedly is).
    3. The atmosphere in the university is just laughably absurd.
      1. The Archive has no catalogue? Seriously? Wtf?
      2. Students work in the precious Archives? Give me a break. This has zero plausibility.
      3. He supposedly is almost late for the admission exam, but somehow magically manages to spend hours at the back seats listening to other students answering the same questions over and over.
        Utter bullshit, this is totally impossible.
      4. A student is banned from the Archives? Really? Also, totally impossible.
    4. The obsession with ranks and titles (the Arcanum has one, the Workshop has one too, the Talent “pipes” is another one) reminds me an MMORPG much more than any medieval system of guilds and nobility.
    5. Corporal punishment is certainly as far from the author as the Moon, it is described totally implausibly.
  5. Killing a harmless giant endangered 200y.o. herbivore lizard is just so patently ridiculous that I would have stopped reading the book unless it was in the last 5%, and it would not make sense to not finish.

My general impression: “It is a shame that making normal literature is not ‘hot’ any more.”

Rothfuss could have been a second Walter Scott, but instead he creates novels out of DnD sessions.

How to lose weight.

Warning: I am not a doctor, and I cannot give an informed advice. I am just documenting my own experience with a hope that it might be useful to someone, but mostly for my future self.

How to lose weight

Preface

I like being lightweight. It makes me feel good, walk easier, jump easier, sleep better, have more free space on plane and bus seats.

This became an issue when I turned about 23. Before that time I could eat anything, never exercise, and still stay as swift and nimble as I wanted. But things changed at the age of 23, and I am not sure whether due to hormonal changes or changes in lifestyle.

In any case, the necessity to maintain a decent weight arose.

Now, most people know about two methods of keeping fit: diet and exercise. However, as far as I understand, this is a misconception. Exercise, while certainly being a good thing for health, can never lead to weight loss, no matter if it is aerobic or anaerobic (running or weightlifting). When muscles are damaged during exercise (which is normal), and resources (fat) are used for feeding the muscles, the body will always replenish the loss with a slight margin. Exercise can only make you weigh more, even though it is likely to improve the quality of your body composition.

I experienced it myself. At first I did not want to spend a lot of willpower on maintaining a diet, hoping that I would just sign up for a gym, be running 10 kilometres each time, lift weights, and my life will just become better by itself.

This did not happen. After about a year of exercise and running for about 10 kilometres twice a week, I eventually managed to run two races in subsequent days, 10k and 21k on Saturday and Sunday, but had not lost a single extra kilogram.

This made me reconsider my plan, and switch to the dietary method (described below), which proved to be successful, even if a bit taxing to the brain. Using this method, I managed to maintain my desired weight for the past 10 years, within the accepted range. I did get fat again a few times, during the periods of high stress, but inevitably regained my normal weight after normal schedule was restored.

I have to admit that I have a bit of genetic proclivity to a diet, as my grandmother was very successful at maintaining a diet as well. This might not be true for you, so take the manual below with a grain of salt (pun intended).

How to maintain body weight by limiting nutritional intake

Lower your stress.

This claim is hard to prove, but many people would admit that in the times of stress they eat more and grow fat easier.

Whether this is a purely psychological phenomenon, or a physiological as well, I do not know. It is possible that the brain associated stress with a possibility of starvation, and wants to store more resources for future contingencies, so we feel more hungry, and it is also possible that stress produces some involuntary gene expression, which helps storing more fat.

In any case, limiting stress is certainly beneficial to a decent weight.

Of course, “limiting stress” is easier said than done, but there are certain measures that can be undertaken even when some external pressures will not abate by themselves.

  1. Sleep more. Yes, this is very banal, but sleeping is equivalent to eating for the brain, to a degree. Everybody’s sleeping requirements are different, but about 9 hours is usually a good guess. It is believed that sleeping 3*x hours is better than other numbers. That is, sleeping for 6 hours is better than for 7 hours. Most of us dedicate 8 hours, so the advice of this HOWTO is to try sleeping for 9 hours instead.
  2. Go to bed early. After all, it does not really matter when you sleep, so I recommend going to bed right after sunset, as this is the most natural to the body clock. This also means that you will have some quiet time in the morning, when no cars are running, and the city is quiet. Also, going to bed right after you get off work has a nice benefit of resting right after getting tired, so your best relaxed hours (in the morning) are spent on your tasks, not your boss’ tasks.
  3. Go for a walk. Walking is a good thing, it pumps lymph in your body, as lymph does not have any other pump. Lymphatic system does not have a heart. Finding time for a walk is usually a bit hard, but I just managed to have a walk while going to work. Just get off one metro station earlier or later, and walk to your office building.
  4. Plan some time to relax. This seem banal, but the point of planning rest is that you can actually plan high quality rest rather than follow your bodily instincts in just grabbing whatever entertainment is available at hand, rather than using high-quality entertainment planned in advance. Yest, entertainment can also be high and low quality! Reading books is usually better than binge-watching Douyin. Going for a day trip on a weekend is usually better than playing computer games for 40 hours in a row.

The above measures will not lead to a measurable weight loss, but they will make keeping a diet easier.

Calculate your necessary nutritional intake.

In order to lose weight, it is necessary to eat less. Everyone sort of knows this maxim, but, judging by my conversations with people who tried to lose weight like I did, many people do not understand what they are doing.

Firstly, many people seem to believe that it is enough to count the amount of calories you eat.

While this might work for some people, I found that it does not work for me.

You see, people do not eat energy, people eat food, and food is measured in grams (or kilograms). While it is possible to find an amount of energy equivalent to consuming a certain amount of food, most of these calculations are highly dependent on the bodily efficiency of each particular individual, so I am finding most of them dubious.

What is, on the other hand, possible to calculate is the amount of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins consumed. Of course, this calculation is also approximate, as not all carbs, fats and proteins are equal, but at least they bear some resemblance to reality and do not rely of dubious formulas.

Moreover, the law of conservation of mass is much easier to grasp for a human than the law of conservation of energy, and unless nuclear reactions are involved (and they are not), it is good enough: if you consume less materials than your body uses and discards, after a consumption cycle (about a day or a few), you will have to weigh less than before, that’s just it.

How much CFP do I need?

(CFP is “carbs, fats, proteins”.)

This section is very subjective, but there are “overall numbers”, which seem to be good enough for most people.

Firstly, you need to find your normal body weight.

This is not easy, as everyone is different, men and women are different, and among even men and women of equal height, bone density and diameter differ, but the good thing is that this only needs to be done once for your body.

Okay, theoretically not once. The number is going to change if you regularly go to the gym and purposefully work on increasing your muscular mass. If you do, refer to your trainer and medical doctor tracking your progress, this HOWTO is not for you.

For the people who want to develop the program once, follow it forever, and forget the formulas, finding a proper weight should work. I cannot tell you a correct formula, your have to find it yourself, but there are plenty.

After you have found your desired weight, you need to find out the daily amount of CFP needed to maintain the normal weight, per kilogram of desired body weight:

  1. Carbohydrates :: 4 grams
  2. Fats :: 1 gram
  3. Proteins :: 1+ gram

Let us have a look at a person who weighs 60 kg (something between a man and a woman):

240g of carbs, 60g of fat, 60g of protein.

These numbers are intended to contribute to total consumption of the body, which primarily consists of two channels:

  1. Repairs
  2. Energy

Now, in principle, all three resources are used used for both channels, the body needs all CFP to build from, and it can also “burn” all three CFP to produce energy. This is not too important, but carbs are transformed into ATP, fats are turned into ketone bodies, and proteins … I don’t know, but in any case, burning proteins is a very bad idea and a sign of your body malfunctioning to a large degree.

In practice, though, the body will most naturally use the resources for repairs with higher priority than for energy. After all, human body can be remarkably efficient at turning stuff into energy, but building … not so much, otherwise we would have all been bodybuilders.

Even if you eat just the amount of resources above, you will be already losing weight, because this is a bare minimum needed to maintain the desired weight, so there will be a delta between what the current body weight would need and the target body. You will be losing weight very slowly, but for many people that is enough.

Now, the first disillusionment maxim: Losing weight is a process which cannot be finished. Indeed, after you have found a correct amount of food, you have to use it until the end of your life, because, guess what, you will not grow up any more, your body is a now a closed system and whatever comes in has to come out or stay.

Eventually, after you have reached your desired body weight, it is best to keep the amount of food just equivalent to the recommended intake of CFP.

But I want to lose weight faster!

Okay, fine, if you want to lose weight faster, you can reduce the numbers mentioned in the previous section further. Further, but not that further.

Okay, there is a way to lose weight very fast, it is called “fasting”. Basically this means that you stop eating completely and only drink water. Very soon (in a few days), your digestive system will deactivate and your will stop feeling hungry, unless you see food.

You can fast for a week, or even longer, not eating any food, and losing weight very quickly. I am not sure how quickly, but in any case I do not recommend doing that at all.

While it is not that unhealthy as many people believe (in fact, dangerous effects from starvation would only appear after about … well, more than a week), it is also practically useless. You will lose weight fast, but you will also gain weight very fast after resuming eating, and you would have to follow the “correct CFP” diet after fasting anyway, so the “fasting streak” will not give you much.

However, you can reduce the amount of CFP below the bare minimum, and it will make you lose weight faster, even though not that faster.

What can you cut?

Practically speaking, the only resource you can really cut from the above numbers is carbs. Unfortunately, as I said, not all fats and proteins are equal. Some fats that are stored into your body cannot be used for construction, you have to eat some external fats, and the body cannot really store proteins at all, you need to eat them every day.

But cutting carbs is much possible. If you eat, say, 120g of carbs per day, no problem, the body will break down more fats to compensate for energy loss, which is more or less what you need, because most of the “bad weight” consists of fat.

Cutting fat… well, it not that recommended. I guess (do not trust my word), that it is fairly safe to go from 60g to 30g of fat, but I cannot prove it, talk to your doctor.

Again, do not overdo it.

Find the amount of food corresponding to your CFP, eating which does not leave you too hungry.

The second disillusioning sad story: you will feel hungry.

Unfortunately, feeling hungry is natural for adults. This is one of the eye-opening realisations of how adults differ from children. Children can eat and feel full, and it is normal for them, most of the things they eat will turn into growth.

Adults cannot. Moreover, millennia of evolution produced in human adults a feeling of hunger which exceeds the amount needed to just consume the CFP needed to maintain normal weight.

This is where “semaglutide” is trying to intervene, by reducing this sense of hunger in adults. But this HOWTO is not about semaglutide, because I managed to successfully lose weight without it.

How do you find a correct composition of your diet?

CFP is often written on the back of the packs of food you are buying, or it is possible to search for it online.

Now, the first thing you will discover is that you cannot really eat anything at all.

For example, Coke has 16g of carbs per 100 ml. An American can of Coke has 240 ml, so about 40 grams of carbs.

Assuming that you eat three times a day, you have about 80 grams of carbs budget per meal. And half of that budget is a can of Coke. Can you really satisfy a half of your hunger with a can of Coke? Come on.

Now let us look at things we used to eat “normally” in the past. After the WW2, the Soviet government provided veterans with a “bread allowance” of 600 grams of bread per day (about one “bukhanka”). Russian bread has 48 grams of carbs per 100 grams of bread, which makes it 288 grams of carbs per day. This is already more than the recommended amount! And that is without any other food, such as gruel or meat, which is required for protein intake.

(Of course, the Soviet union after the WW2 was not at all rich. The bread allowance was divided between all family members, and meat was such a scarcity that even mentioning it seems like a cruel joke, and, of course, they needed to do much more physical work, but our understanding of what is “normal to eat” comes from those times.)

So, basically, you can forget about both Coke and bread.

Well, it sort of depends on your stomach volume and natural hunger levels. Some people feel so full after a single slice (25g) of bread that they do not need anything else for the rest of the day. The allowance of 240/60/60, in fact, even gives some permission to eat a birthday cake slice once in a while.

Let us look at a birthday cake CFP: 40/17/6. That is not that worse than bread actually. If a typical slice is 200 grams, you are getting about half of your daily fat from it and a third of carbs. This is not an overwhelming number, and, in theory, you can even eat a slice every day, and still lose weight, if all the other food you consume is very-very low-carbs low-fat. But for me, a slice of cheesecake makes me very hungry, so having a diet of cheesecakes is impractical.

What can we actually eat?

By all means, go and read through your favourite nutritional information website and look and find you best diet. You do not have to follow my advice below.

But my desire is to feel as little hunger as possible given my (male, fairly tall) size, so I want to eat large volumes, and I am blessed by the nature of not being a gourmand, so I can eat what other people consider to be boring.

Which means that the food I am allowing myself to eat actually boils down to the following, very meagre list:

  1. Carbs
    1. Cabbage :: 2/0/1 (all sorts of it, including cauliflower and broccoli)
    2. Cucumber :: 3/0/1
    3. Tomato :: 4/0/1
    4. Courgette :: 4/0/1
  2. Proteins
    1. Chicken breast :: 1/4/31
    2. Prawns/Shrimp :: 1/1/20
    3. Horse meat :: 1/5/40
  3. Desserts
    1. Egg :: 1/10/13
    2. Onion :: 10/0/1
    3. Garlic :: 3/0/1
  4. Milk :: 5/3/3
  5. Tea, Coffee :: 0
  6. Sparkling soda :: 0
  7. Cooking oil :: 0/0/99
  8. Tomato sauce, Mayonnaise, Mustard :: 15/50/2

Even if you cut your carbs intake to 60g per day, you can still eat 3000 grams of cabbage, which is more than enough to not feel hungry any more. (3000 grams is still not infinity.)

Protein is not that detrimental to weight loss. The body is not very likely to turn it into fat (although overdoing proteins can have other negative effects), the limiting factor for chicken breast is fat. 60/4 = 15, which makes it about 1500 grams of chicken breast per day. Again, defeating hunger with 1500 grams of chicken breast and 3000 grams of cabbage is quite possible.

The biggest contributors to fat are, surprisingly, sauce and eggs. Eggs have a lot other, non CFP elements, such as vitamins, so eating an egg per day is probably worth it, but and egg becomes a dessert. Eating cabbage and chicken breast without sauce is tiresome, so I allow myself a spoon of it, 15g, which is already 7 grams of fat.

So, to sum up, I am usually eating once a day, a meal of about the following:

  1. Roasted or boiled cabbage, 1kg :: 40/0/10
  2. Roasted chicken breast, 500g :: 5/20/150
  3. Garlic 50g :: 5/0/1
  4. Cooking oil, 15g :: 0/15/0
  5. Sauce :: 0/7/0
  6. Coffee with milk 500ml :: 10/6/6

55/50/170

How do I measure those weights so precisely? Well, I bought kitchen scales which are ridiculously easy to use and check my components before cooking.

I am also drinking a lot of decaf coffee and tea, and pure water, and sometimes eating a cucumber or a tomato.

In total: 60/60/170

I would also like to say a few words about desserts and candy.

As can be seen from the “menu”, onion, garlic, and eggs end up being desserts in this program, rather than being normal food. This is not as bad as it sounds, after a couple of weeks of a cabbage diet, garlic and onion start tasting really sweet, but in any case, they are spicy, and it is hard to eat a lot of them (I only eat them raw and juicy).

Tea, coffee, and soda water are listed in the “menu”, even though their CFP value is close to zero. They are a huge help in combating hunger during the day. Warm coffee with milk is just excellent at reducing hunger, and tens of different soda flavours, seemingly identical, really start tasting really different after some time, and you can drink as many of them as you want.

Monitoring progress and daily schedule

It is very helpful to eat regularly, mostly because it makes monitoring progress very more consistent, because you body has the same weight in the same hours of the day, therefore measurements are “of the same entity”, comparing apples to apples.

Measurements are very important to understand whether you are doing into a correct direction, and to increase the feeling of success. (A popular maxim says “if you want to achieve a goal, first you need to measure it”.)

As I mentioned above, I eat solid food once a day, but I drink a lot of decaf coffee during the day, which is very helpful to not feel hungry.

Contrary to popular belief, it does not really matter if you eat in the evening or during the night, it seems to take about 3 days to incorporate the materials consumed into your body.

So I eat before going to sleep, because when feeling full, falling asleep is much easier than when hungry.

I am measuring my weight once a day, in the morning, when the water drunk and anything eaten not according to the schedule cannot affect the measurement.

(Be aware that any material going through the digestive tract cannot take any of your body weight away. The actual molecules which are leaving your body and are leaving through one of the three channels:

  1. urinary tract
  2. sweating
  3. breathing out CO₂)

I am writing down the results on paper, but in the past I used to just write them on the bathroom mirror with a marker, since I have my scales there and I can measure my weight without clothing without disturbing anyone with an unsightly show.

With such a schedule, it is possible to achieve weight loss speed of about 1.5 kg per week. Do not try to exceed this speed, it is not healthy. 1.5 kg per week is a solid observable number, which brings a lot of joy, helping to maintain the schedule.

Suppose you want to lower your weight from 90 kilograms to 60 kilograms (a short, but very overweight man). It would not be healthy to do this in less that 20 weeks, but in about half a year this should be doable.

On the other hand, I cannot vouch for the fact that the above observations will be applicable to women mutatis mutandis, because body fat plays a larger role in female metabolism than in male metabolism. Fat is actually producing some female hormones, so its percentage in a female body is naturally higher, so, firstly, probably females need to consume more fat than men, and are probably not expected to reach 1.5 kg per week weight loss.

Some of this weight loss will be muscular weight, unfortunately, this cannot be avoided. Losing fat is inevitably accompanied by losing muscles too. But for me this has never been much of a concern, I am not doing a lot of physical work.

Exercising can possibly make muscular loss less prominent.

But in any case, it is very nice to have a table with the number “how my body weight goes down”. On some days it will actually go up, do not expect your weight to decrease by 200 grams every day, but on average it should be possible.

How to deal with episodes when you ARE REALLY HUNGRY?

Eat a lot of food from the list above.

Instead of eating a 1 kilogram of cabbage, eat 3. If 500 grams of chicken do not satisfy you – add up 500 more grams of shrimp. If even that fails, add 500 more grams of horse meat.

Most of the time when we are DESPERATELY HUNGRY, the desire can be squelched by variety better than by a sheer amount. The list above, no matter how meagre, still gives you some slack in choosing food.

What to do when your weight becomes as you want it to be?

Well, maintaining a constant weight is, in some sense even harder than losing weight.

Now you have to care not just about the KPI going up, but also about it going down unduly.

So, if while “losing weight” you only have to care about “not exceeding” the value plus tolerance, now you also have to care about not cutting too much.

This is also the time when the rough target of 240/60/60 stops being valid, because you really need to be “within a reasonable margin” of your bare minimum.

But at least you can congratulate yourself with an achievement.

You would probably want to switch to eating twice a day, not once. Which will also make measuring your weight harder, but it is probably possible to measure the weight twice a day, before each meal. This is actually much worse than measuring once, in the morning, but better than nothing. You can probably use “smart scales”, as writing down twice-a-day measurements is tiresome.

Overall, 240 grams of carbs allows a variety much larger than 60, but I generally like increasing amount, not increasing variety. As I said, I am not a gourmand.

Conclusion

This memo contains a real experience, but, of course, is subjective and not written by a medical professional, consult your doctor if in doubt.

Reading “The Book of Change” by Richard Rutt.

01_title-yi-jing.jpeg

Many readers of my dispersed essays know that I am a huge fan of manuals and HOWTOs.

Indeed, I consider them a superior genre of literature, and sincerely think that most of non fiction literature should obey their format.

Imagine my joy when I discovered that “Book Of Change” by Richard Rutt is written in this style. (Although the typesetting itself is horrible disgusting!)

Why exactly did it decide to read “The Book of Change”? Well, firstly, because it is the earliest known consistent text in existence (there are Shāng bone inscriptions, but they are can hardly be called a consistent text), and its traces are visible all over the Chinese and related cultures.

Even Korean flag includes references to the Book of Change in the form of four “gua” on it.

I did not expect that it would take me so long. Indeed, I will have been reading the ’book of change’ for more than 3 years by the time this essay is published, and all of that despite Richard Rutt’s translation being accompanied by a giant commentary in the form of a manual, and it being a translation into English, a language I know decently.

Granted, a lot of the complications are due to the fact that the typesetting is really junk, and I had to spend much more time googling and de/re-compiling the epub file before the narrative could flow smoothly into my brain.

Finally I am done, and in this text I am going to try and express my thoughts about how “Zhōu Yì” stays relevant nowadays and why it is worth a read by every aspiring programmer, especially in the Rutt’s version.

Read the essay

Reading “Genetics of Genius” by V.P.Efroimson.

001_book-cover-BOOK-35168-large.jpg

I have read “Genetics of Genius” by Vladimir Efroimson.

This is a book has, seemingly, never been translated into any language other than Russian, so this review/summary might end up being interesting to the non-Russian audience.

This book is about genetic factors which seem to be associated with highly-intense brain activity, which is the way Efroimson is defining genius.

Throughout the book the is analysing an impressive amount of historic figures who are universally recognised to be geniuses or close to geniuses, building his own research on both the previously published genius surveys, and on his own studies of the biographies of insofar not closely examined historic figures.

Thereupon he presents his theory of identifying, selecting, and nurturing geniuses in a society.

Those interested are welcome under the cut.

Continue reading “Reading “Genetics of Genius” by V.P.Efroimson.”

Notes on using fonts in computers.

I am writing this file as a guide for using fonts. Fonts have been disproportionately difficult to use because of two reasons:

  1. A lot of terminology is coming from the times of Gutenberg, and is also constantly changing and inconsistent.
  2. Computing is largely driven by Latin-writing companies and communities, which have no incentive to make sure that all fonts work across all alphabets.

This file is not about the practice of using fonts for UI in computers, it is about using fonts with documents.

Continue reading “Notes on using fonts in computers.”

Reading “Bogleheads Guide to Investing” by Taylor Larimore, Mel Lindauer, and Michael LeBoeuf

000_cover.jpg

I have read the Bogleheads’ Guide to Investing, found it useful, and want to write down my own experience in this essay.

Please, be aware that this review is NOT an investment advice, that investing is a risky activity, and that no responsible person should trust anything written on the Internet.

After this obligatory disclaimer, I would like to open the essay with a teaser quotation from the book:

Through education and experience, most of us come to learn and practice certain life principles that serve us well.

  1. Don’t settle for average. Strive to be the best.
  2. Listen to your gut. What you feel in your heart is usually right.
  3. If you don’t know something, ask. Talk to an expert or hire one and let the expert handle it. This will save a lot of time and frustration.
  4. You get what you pay for. Good help is not cheap and cheap help is not good.
  5. If there is a crisis, take action. Do something to fix it.
  6. History repeats itself. The best possible predictor of future performance is past performance.

Well, guess what? Applying these principles to investing is destined to leave you poorer.

If you are feel intrigued by what these three old rich financiers have to offer you instead of those common sense truths, welcome under the cut.

Continue reading “Reading “Bogleheads Guide to Investing” by Taylor Larimore, Mel Lindauer, and Michael LeBoeuf”

Reading “Democracy: The God That Failed” by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

000_cover.jpg

I have read “Democracy: The God That Failed” by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

Initially, I thought that it would be deep, thoughtful reading, similar to that required to comprehend at least the “Managerial Revolution”, if not “The Capital” or “Wealth of Nations”. In fact, the book is very light on mathematics and, even though it presents a general introduction into the Austrian economic school political stance, it does not even try to be scientifically rigorous.

In this “review” I want to write down what I remember from the book, for my own future reference.

I admit that I had had certain pre-conceptions before starting to read the book, and several of those happened to be false. Of course I knew that the Austrian school stands in opposition to Marxism, but I did not know how exactly it does so. I chose to read Hoppe’s “Democracy: The God That Failed” because I had a vague idea about the “school” development, with three main figures being well-known: Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, and Hans-Hermann Hoppe, each of them being a spiritual successor of the previous one, and Hoppe being the youngest of them, and still alive.

If you are interested in what I managed to read out of it, you’re welcome under the cut.

Continue reading “Reading “Democracy: The God That Failed” by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.”

Reading “Blown to Bits” by Harry Lewis, Ken Ledeen, Hal Abelson, and Wendy Seltzer.

blown-to-bits.gif

I have read “Blown to Bits”, a book by four distinguished authors. In this file I am writing which impression it has made on me, and what I learnt.

Even though Hal Abelson is not the first in the list of authors, it is him who attracted me to this book. You see, a long time ago I also read a few pages from another book by him, and I was impressed by the clarity of the narrative and the powerful ideas which challenged my mind.

So, when I discovered that he has also written a book on “digital society” and the present state of the Internet, I knew that I have to read it. I planned to read something on “digital law” and “digital society” for a long time, but I would not expect Abelson to be the person to turn to in order to achieve this.

There are other books on the subject, some of them from renowned programmers:

  1. Brian Kernighan: D is for Digital
  2. Brian Kernighan: Understanding the Digital World
  3. Brian Kernighan: Millions, Billions, Zillions
  4. Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee: The Second Machine Age
  5. Michael P Lynch: The Internet of Us

If anyone reads them and wants to share the experience, please, message me. This review, however, is dedicated to “Blown to Bits”.

Continue reading “Reading “Blown to Bits” by Harry Lewis, Ken Ledeen, Hal Abelson, and Wendy Seltzer.”

“Managerial Revolution” by James Burnham, recap-and-review.

01_burnham.webp

I have read ”Managerial Revolution” by James Burnham, as an entry into the political philosophy of Mencius Moldbug.

The book is interesting, and I decided to write a review on it, just as I do with many interesting books.

It speaks about quite a few things that are observable with a naked eye in our everyday life, however most popular political discussions, especially online, seem to be either unaware of Burnham’s theory, and also do not possess the vocabulary to describe the world with a similar clarity.

Continue reading ““Managerial Revolution” by James Burnham, recap-and-review.”