By Logan Panchot

CEO, Clear Contracts · Co-Founder, Clarity · Co-Creator, Cardano Builder DAO

For years, Project Catalyst was Cardano’s ecosystem funding engine. It onboarded builders, funded open-source work, underwrote marketing, and bankrolled countless community initiatives. Then it stopped. Funds 15 and 16 were halted, and roughly 40 million ADA earmarked for ecosystem participants was sidelined.

The obvious question is what replaces it. The sharper question is whether a single pipeline should ever have tried to fund everything in the first place.

Catalyst was the jack of all trades. It deserves real credit for what it built. It proved a decentralized community could deploy treasury capital at scale. But being a jack of all trades means being a master of none. A voter evaluating a DeFi protocol, a developer SDK, and a marketing campaign in the same round has no realistic way to assess all three with equal competence. Capital got scattered across too many verticals, measurement never caught up, and real outcomes were hard to see.

The Initiative DAO Framework is not a patch on Catalyst and it is not a single replacement DAO. It breaks Catalyst’s function into several domain-specific DAOs, each governed by the people closest to the work, each with its own mandate and KPIs, and all coordinated under a shared dRep oversight layer.

Specialization where deployment happens. Collective accountability where strategy gets set.

What Catalyst Got Right and Where It Fell Short

Catalyst’s scale was its strength and its ceiling. A broad voter pool created legitimacy, but it also meant decisions about deeply technical work were made by voters who couldn’t realistically evaluate them. Accountability was thin: once funded, projects reported on their own terms with no standardized KPI framework tying outcomes back to ecosystem growth. And the administrative surface was enormous, hundreds of proposals per round competing for attention, most never surfacing to the voters best equipped to judge them.

The diagnosis isn’t that decentralized funding doesn’t work. It’s that one pipeline cannot be specialized and comprehensive at the same time. The Initiative DAO Framework keeps what worked, community governance, transparent capital allocation, open participation, and rebuilds the structure so that expertise and accountability scale with it.

The Framework: Split Catalyst Into Domain-Specific DAOs

Instead of one funding pipeline for everything, the framework creates a separate Initiative DAO for each strategic sector of the ecosystem. Each DAO has its own membership, governance process, and funding strategy. Each is governed by people with real domain expertise. And each operates under a shared operational standard that enforces transparency, KPI accountability, and alignment with Cardano’s long-term goals.

The model runs on a three-step cycle:

1. The Cardano treasury allocates capital at the sector level through dRep governance. This starts moving the ecosystem away from voting on hundreds of individual proposals. dReps decide how much capital flows to application development, developer tooling, marketing, and other verticals for example.
2. Each Initiative DAO deploys that capital within its domain. The people closest to the work decide where funding will have the most impact, the contributors who can actually evaluate quality, feasibility, and fit via an open membership with objective standards.
3. Every DAO reports against ecosystem-wide KPIs tied to the Cardano 2030 Vision: Monthly Active Users, Total Value Locked, and Monthly On-Chain Transactions. dReps use that performance data to adjust allocations the following cycle.

Capital follows results. Domain experts decide deployment. dReps hold the structure accountable.

What Every Initiative DAO Has in Common

These aren’t loose guidelines. They are structural requirements baked into the framework.

Domain expertise through rigorous membership. Each DAO is built around a clearly defined vertical with objective membership criteria. A builder-focused DAO is governed by teams who have shipped and scaled live applications. A tooling DAO is governed by contributors who understand infrastructure, SDKs, and developer workflows. Membership is open but rigorous, with KYB for entities and KYC for officers.

One member, one vote. Each DAO operates on a one-member-one-vote basis to ensure fairness and democratic control. Leaders answer to the full membership, not to concentrated capital.

Hybrid council governance. Every Initiative DAO is run by a 7-member council. Three seats are elected by dReps, ensuring alignment with broader treasury objectives. Four are elected by the DAO’s own membership on a one-member-one-vote basis, preserving domain expertise. The council does not make funding decisions, it’s role is to steward governance process, participation, and compliance with the DAOs Code of Conduct.

dRep oversight. Each Initiative DAO answers to the dReps through an oversight layer that defines reporting requirements, sets KPIs, and enforces transparency standards. Any dRep can join the oversight layer, creating a governance body that sits above the individual verticals without replacing them.

Transparent KPI dashboards.

Each DAO maintains a public dashboard where funded projects report metrics drawn, wherever possible, directly from on-chain data. The Cardano Builder DAO’s dashboard at cbdao.taptools.io is already a live example.

On-chain treasury enforcement.

Smart contracts enforce all spending. Every allocation, disbursement, and milestone payment is recorded on-chain and verifiable by any community member. Transparency isn’t optional, it’s structural.

Public governing documents.

Every Initiative DAO operates under a publicly available governing document so that members and dReps share a clear understanding of how the DAO runs.

Ecosystem Positioning.

Initiative DAOs are the execution layer for Cardano’s ecosystem strategy. That strategy doesn’t originate in any single place. It emerges from dReps setting on-chain priorities, Intersect Committees shaping technical and governance direction, and grassroots movements surfacing what the community actually needs built. Initiative DAOs translate these signals into funded work.

Intersect plays a distinct and essential role in this model. As the budget administrator, Intersect sits alongside the DAOs as an independent check and balance, verifying and auditing DAO operations to ensure that the milestones committed to before the budget period are genuinely delivered.

This separation of powers is deliberate. Strategy setters, capital deployers, and budget verifiers are structurally distinct actors. The result is a system where speed of execution doesn’t come at the cost of accountability and where ADA holders can trust that every cycle of funding closes with verification before the next one begins.

This Isn’t Starting From Scratch

The Initiative DAO Framework is an extension of the Cardano Builder DAO, the first Initiative DAO, approved in the 2025 Cardano Budget. Builder DAO proved the model works: ~11 million ADA distributed, 34 proposals funded, and KPI tracking across every funded project. It demonstrated that a domain-specific, membership-based DAO could deploy treasury capital with full transparency and real accountability.

But Builder DAO only fills a slice of what Catalyst covered, and that is the point. No single DAO should try to cover everything. The 2026 pilot scales the model horizontally, bringing several new Initiative DAOs onto the ballot to cover the rest of what Catalyst used to touch, each one led by the experts who can actually evaluate the work.

What’s Coming to the Ballot

Cardano Builder DAO (Year 2). Continuing and expanding the 2025 mandate. Builder DAO funds the live dApps and services that produce Cardano’s core KPIs. It enters Year 2 with a proven track record and an operational playbook other DAOs can inherit.

Ecosystem Tooling DAO (Year 1). A new DAO purpose-built to fund the libraries, SDKs, APIs, block explorers, indexers, and developer workflows every serious Cardano product depends on. Without robust tooling, builders cannot build.

KickStarter DAO. A DAO to fund high-potential early-stage ideas and respond to ecosystem needs through RFPs and open submissions. Where early innovation gets its start.

The community is also exploring additional verticals, including a BuilderFest DAO for grassroots ecosystem events, a KOL DAO for creator marketing, and a Cardano Venture Marketing DAO for projects to get access to professional marketers that can help execute campaigns to increase KPIs. These are still in discussion, but the framework is designed to accommodate new verticals as the ecosystem evolves, and that flexibility is the whole point.

Why This Matters Now

With Catalyst on pause and 40 million ADA sitting on the sideline, the Cardano ecosystem needs a funding mechanism that matches its ambition. The Initiative DAO Framework isn’t about filling the hole Catalyst left, it’s about upgrading the approach: replacing a general-purpose pipeline with specialized coordination layers, swapping broad voter pools for informed domain experts, and tying every ADA deployed to measurable outcomes against Cardano’s long-term growth targets.

The proposals will be on the ballot soon. If you’re a dRep, a builder, a developer, or someone who cares about how Cardano’s treasury capital gets deployed, now is the time to review the proposals, ask questions, and get involved. This is the community’s opportunity to shape how ecosystem funding works for years to come.

Get Involved

Are you interested in joining any of the DAO’s using this framework? Here are relevant group chats to consider joining.

Cardano Builder DAO Discord: https://discord.gg/aUK7TSr7pY
Cardano Tooling DAO Telegram: https://t.me/+EG6NDUrowNM3Y2Ix
Cardano Venture Marketing DAO Telegram: https://t.me/+QO_hoqch8I04M2Yx
dRep Oversight Chat: https://t.co/0jQzmLklSv

CEO, Clear Contracts | Co-Founder, Clarity | Co-Creator, Cardano Builder DAO

Abstract

Public blockchain ecosystems need better ways to allocate capital.

As ecosystems grow, treasury funding becomes harder to manage. More proposals compete for attention, more entities request resources, and more voters are asked to make decisions across domains where they may not have deep expertise. The result is often fragmentation: too many disconnected initiatives, inconsistent accountability, and limited visibility into outcomes.

The Initiative DAO Framework is designed to solve that problem.

The Initiative DAO Framework is a blockchain-agnostic framework designed to optimize the allocation of ecosystem funding across the verticals that matter most for a network’s operation and long-term growth. Rather than distributing treasury capital through fragmented, proposal-by-proposal processes, the framework organizes capital into specialized DAOs, each focused on a clear domain, with transparent reporting, aligned incentives, and built-in accountability.

At its core, the Initiative DAO Framework is built on four principles:

• Transparency in how funds are allocated and used
• Checks and balances between domain experts, elected representatives, and the broader community
• Alignment with the blockchain’s long-term vision and treasury objectives
• Accountability through open reporting, measurable KPIs, and onchain enforcement

The goal is simple: create a more effective, more transparent, and more scalable way to steward ecosystem capital.

While the model is designed to be portable across any blockchain with a decentralized treasury, the Cardano ecosystem is pioneering its implementation in the 2026 budget cycle.

Cardano Initiative DAO Pilot Continuation for 2026

In the 2026 budget cycle, dReps, builders, marketers, and developers across the Cardano ecosystem have come together to propose a pilot implementation of the Initiative DAO Framework. This is not a theoretical exercise; it is a concrete proposal backed by the teams and individuals who will operate within it.

The Cardano ecosystem is uniquely positioned to pioneer this framework for two reasons.

1. Governance Evolution Is Needed

In the 2025 budget cycle, many individual companies submitted separate proposals directly to the Cardano treasury. The result was predictable: privately run organizations received treasury funds through a process that produced fragmented initiative ownership and disconnected spending across ecosystem verticals. Ecosystem stakeholders have identified two structural problems with this approach.

High administrative overhead for dReps and Intersect. dReps are required to vote on dozens, potentially hundreds, of individual proposals, even when they have no domain expertise in the subject matter. Intersect, as the budget administrator, must contract with each funded entity individually, creating bottlenecks in processes and payouts that slow the entire ecosystem down.

Lack of KPI accountability. With funds flowing to many separate entities through individual grants, the ecosystem lacked a coherent accountability and oversight layer. There was no institutional mechanism to measure whether treasury spending was actually driving ecosystem growth. The Initiative DAO Framework directly addresses this gap by creating an accountability layer responsible for overseeing governance standards across each Initiative DAO, building on and innovating the strategic infrastructure already in place at Intersect.

2. Cardano Has a Decentralized Treasury

The Cardano blockchain maintains a decentralized treasury governed by delegated representatives (dReps), which allocates funds across the ecosystem each budget cycle. This existing governance infrastructure provides the foundation that the Initiative DAO Framework needs to operate. The framework does not require new on-chain primitives; it works within Cardano’s existing governance architecture while adding a strategic layer on top.

The 2026 Pilot Continuation Overview

The Initiative DAO Framework is not starting from scratch. It builds on the successes and learnings of the Cardano Builder DAO, the first Initiative DAO, which was approved in the 2025 Cardano Budget. The Builder DAO demonstrated that a domain-specific, membership-based DAO could effectively allocate treasury capital to high-impact ecosystem projects with full transparency and KPI accountability.

Now the community has come together to submit a unified vision for scaling the framework. The 2026 pilot proposes implementations across two ecosystem sectors that dReps will be able to vote on:

• Cardano Builder DAO (2nd year): Continuing and expanding on its 2025 mandate.
• Ecosystem Tooling DAO (1st year): New DAO for developer infrastructure and open-source tools.

Other strategic initiatives that the community is considering that could operate under the initiative DAO framework

• KickStarter DAO (In discussion): New DAO to fund high-potential early-stage ideas.
• Marketing DAO (In discussion): The community is working with the Growth and Marketing Committee to align on the best approach.
• KOL DAO: There has been some discussion of this as well
• BuilderFest DAO: Grassroots DAO to plan events to grow Cardano.

What Every Initiative DAO Has in Common

Before examining each DAO individually, it is important to understand the operational framework that every Initiative DAO shares. These are not suggestions — they are structural requirements baked into the framework.

Domain Expertise Through Rigorous Membership

Each DAO is built around a clearly defined vertical and establishes objective membership criteria tailored to that domain. This is what creates an informed voter base. This matters because good capital allocation depends on informed decision-making. A builder-focused DAO should be governed by participants who understand what it takes to launch and scale live applications. A tooling DAO should be accountable to contributors who understand infrastructure, SDKs, and developer workflows. Membership is not meant to be closed or arbitrary. It is meant to be rigorous, relevant, and aligned to the needs of that initiative

dRep Oversight and Accountability

Each initiative DAO is accountable to the dReps via the oversight layer. This layer is intended to define reporting requirements, set KPIs and goals, and enforce transparency standards across the broader framework. In the current conception, any dRep would be able to join the Oversight DAO.

This creates a governance layer that sits above individual verticals without replacing them. Initiative DAOs retain domain autonomy, while the Oversight DAO ensures the ecosystem has consistent standards around stewardship and performance.

dRep Alignment Through Council Structure

Each Initiative DAO is governed by a 7-member council. Three seats are elected by dReps through ekklesia, ensuring alignment with broader treasury objectives. Four seats are elected by the DAO’s own membership on a one-member-one-vote basis, preserving domain expertise. This hybrid model maintains an accountability loop: dReps set strategic direction, domain experts execute.

Transparent KPI Dashboards

Each Initiative DAO maintains a public KPI dashboard where funded projects are required to report their metrics. Wherever possible, these metrics are drawn directly from on-chain data, removing the possibility of self-reported inflation. The Cardano Builder DAO’s KPI dashboard (cbdao.taptools.io) provides a live example of this approach in action.

On-Chain Treasury Enforcement

Smart contracts enforce all treasury spending within each Initiative DAO. This is not optional transparency; it is structural. Every allocation, every disbursement, every milestone payment is recorded on-chain and verifiable by any community member.

Structured Governance Cycles

Each DAO operates on defined governance cycles during which new members can apply for admission and new projects can submit funding proposals. This creates predictable windows for participation while giving DAOs the structure needed to evaluate proposals thoroughly.

One Member One Vote Structure

Each DAO has a one-member-one-vote structure to ensure fairness, democratic control, and member representation, and accountability since leaders answer to full membership.

Governing Document

Each Initiative DAO is governed by its own public governing document, ensuring that both members and dReps have a clear, transparent, and shared understanding of exactly how the DAO is designed to operate.

The 2026 Pilot DAOs

Cardano Builder DAO (2nd year)

Purpose: Funds live dApps and ecosystem applications that drive measurable Cardano adoption and value creation. The Builder DAO is entering its second year, building on a track record that includes approximately 12 million ADA distributed, 34 builders funded, and KPI tracking across all funded projects.

Membership: KYB-verified entities that operate a live product on Cardano, producing Cardano 2030 Vision KPIs (Monthly Active Users, Total Value Locked, Monthly On-Chain Transactions).

Ecosystem Tooling DAO

Purpose: Funds and maintains the critical infrastructure, SDKs, and developer tools that power Cardano’s ecosystem. Without robust tooling, builders cannot build. This DAO ensures the foundational layer of the ecosystem receives dedicated, strategic funding.

Membership: KYB-verified entities actively maintaining open-source infrastructure or core ecosystem tools used by the Cardano community.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -

Other DAOs that have come to life and have started gaining traction after hearing about this new framework include:

KickStarter DAO

Purpose: Funds the highest-potential early-stage ideas and projects entering the Cardano ecosystem. While the Builder DAO focuses on live applications with existing traction, the KickStarter DAO identifies and supports promising concepts before they have a track record — filling the gap between ideation and launch.

Membership: Criteria are being finalized as part of the pilot proposal process.

Cardano Marketing DAO

Purpose: The community is currently working with the Growth and Marketing Committee to align on what the pilot version of the Cardano Marketing DAO should focus on. There is clear appetite for a dedicated marketing function within the Initiative DAO Framework, and discussions are ongoing to define the right scope and structure for launch.

Membership: To be determined as part of the alignment process.

What’s at Stake

The Initiative DAO Framework represents a fundamental shift in how blockchain ecosystems can allocate treasury capital. Instead of funding entities, it funds strategic outcomes. Instead of asking governance participants to evaluate hundreds of individual proposals, it elevates the conversation to the sector level. Instead of hoping that funded projects deliver results, it enforces accountability through on-chain KPI tracking and layered oversight.

In 2025, the Cardano Builder DAO served as the first test of an initiative DAO and the 2026 Cardano pilot implementation of this model will serve as a continuation of proving out this framework. If it succeeds, it establishes a scalable, repeatable framework that any blockchain with a decentralized treasury can adopt, one that compounds ecosystem value rather than distributing one-time grants with limited follow-up.

The teams building Cardano’s future have come together around a shared vision. Now it’s time to execute.

Published on the Clarity Blog

Clarity is a governance and DAO infrastructure platform in the Cardano ecosystem.

At one point, the Cardano Builder DAO was just an idea.

Justin and I knew something was missing on Cardano. We did not need another funding mechanism that rewarded hype, vague promises, or uninformed voting. We needed a better way to get capital into the hands of serious builders: one that created an informed voter base, aligned funding with Cardano’s core KPIs, and operated with transparency from day one.

So we started simple. We called builders we knew. We pitched the idea. And to our excitement, they liked it.

What started as a grassroots concept became something real: a DAO built by builders, for builders, with clear rules, public governance, smart-contract-governed funds, and a commitment to measurable outcomes.

Today, after two governance cycles, I believe the Cardano Builder DAO stands as one of the best examples in Cardano of on-chain, KPI-based, efficient funding in action.

And as one of the people who helped bring it from 0 to 1, I want to reflect on what we built, what we learned, what was harder than expected, and why I still believe this model matters.

From Idea to Institution

When we created the Cardano Builder DAO, we made a few commitments that were non-negotiable.

We vowed to operate with complete transparency.

We vowed that governance would be visible and rules-based.

We vowed that treasury funds would be governed through smart contracts, not backroom decisions.

And we delivered on that.

Across two governance rounds, the DAO has now distributed over 11 million ADA to 34 companies building on Cardano via a smart contract enforced onchain treasury management system. That alone is meaningful. But what matters even more to me is how it happened.

This was not a popularity contest. It was not a system where people blindly voted on a giant pile of ideas. It was a focused coordination layer made up of real builders evaluating real companies with working products and measurable impact. It was designed around one core belief: the people closest to the work are often best positioned to evaluate where treasury capital can create real value.

That belief in building a coordination layer centered around informed voting shaped everything.

Building a Better Funding Mechanism for Cardano

From the beginning, I believed Cardano needed a funding mechanism that was both more informed and more accountable.

The Cardano Builder DAO was built around a few core principles:

• an informed voter base
• one member, one vote
• public governance
• measurable KPI-based funding
• transparent treasury operations
• high participation expectations
• focus on established products producing Cardano ecosystem value

This is what made the model different.

In Round 1, that model proved it could work. The DAO brought together 38 voting members, reviewed 27 requesting members, funded 20 companies, and facilitated 1,285 votes and more than 1,000 comments of dialogue and feedback. There were 21 member meetings and 56 governance actions executed in the process. (Medium)

In Round 2, participation got even stronger. The DAO reached an 88% participation rate and funded 14 companies after another month of peer review, temperature checks, debate, and discussion. (Medium)

That matters.

Because if you want better outcomes, you need better process design. And if you want better process design, you need people who are actually willing to show up, read, debate, challenge, and vote.

What I Learned About Politics, Criticism, and Building in Public

One of the biggest lessons for me personally is this:

No matter how good your intentions are, there will still be politics, criticism, and people who simply do not like you.

That is just reality when you are building something ambitious and visible in a public ecosystem.

Some of the criticism has been fair. For example, one of the community concerns we heard was around self-reported KPIs. I actually agree that this was an area that needed improvement.

That is exactly why, in the early stages of the DAO, we partnered with TapTools to build both version 1 and version 2 of the KPI dashboard.

Version 1 gave us a public system for self-reported KPI tracking.

Version 2 moved the DAO toward what I believe this model ultimately needs to be: on-chain KPI sourcing tied directly to live Cardano data. The Round 2 summary explicitly described this evolution as moving from self-reported KPIs to live on-chain data. (Medium)

That transition is important because we are not trying to be perfect on day one. We are trying to iterate toward the strongest possible standard for metrics-based funding.

If we want treasury capital to be deployed credibly, then funded projects need to be measured against real outcomes. That has always been the vision.

We want to be a shining example of what metric-based funding should look like.

Cardano Twitter is the center of all politics and criticism in Cardano. There was one example of a company that was a member of the first round, didn’t get funded, and was not a member of the second round because they missed the deadline to provide KYB information despite many reminders. These two sets of experiences that negatively affected them have resulted in their social accounts being anti-builder DAO. While I believe this project belongs in the DAO, it is sad for me to see projects react like this when we are doing everything we can to do things the right way.

I have learned that taking the high road is always the way, and when you must, you can gracefully try and stand up for yourself and what you believe in.

On the Question of Board Influence

Another criticism I have heard is that the board has outsized influence.

That claim does not hold up when you look at how the DAO actually operates.

The Cardano Builder DAO operates under a strict one-project, one-vote model. The board has responsibilities, yes. It has to enforce rules, make difficult judgment calls, and keep the process moving. But it does not sit above the DAO. It operates within a framework that can be challenged and overturned.

That distinction matters.

The Round 1 retrospective makes this explicit: the appeals process was introduced so that affected members could challenge board decisions through a full DAO governance vote, preserving ultimate power with the membership. (Medium)

And in practice, that power has been exercised.

In Round 2, board actions were, in fact overturned through governance votes. The public Round 2 summary specifically notes a case where the DAO voted to overturn a board ruling, showing that the system could handle disagreement while remaining decentralized and accountable. (Medium)

We have had to make very tough decisions as a board, including decisions not to fund projects that were approved in principle but fell outside what the DAO could support within its agreed framework and budget constraints. Those are not easy calls. They do not make everyone happy. But hard decisions are part of responsible governance.

The numbers tell the story better than rhetoric does.

Across two rounds, this DAO distributed roughly 11 million ADA across 34 different proposals. During Round 2, of the four projects represented with board seats, two were approved for funding, one was rejected, and one did not seek funding. Four board actions were overturned through DAO votes. To me, that is not evidence of a board with outsized influence. It is evidence of a governance system with checks, accountability, and real member power.

What I Am Most Proud of as a Founder of Clarity

As a founder of Clarity, one of the things I am most proud of is how smooth the operations of the DAO have been because of the Clarity platform.

Governance is often talked about in the abstract. But the real question is whether people can actually use the system. Can members participate easily? Can they review proposals, discuss them, vote, and understand what is happening without chaos? Can treasury decisions be executed reliably?

In the Cardano Builder DAO, the answer has been yes.

With Clarity, you had the ability to have a public-facing platform, where only verified members could participate in governance, including COC reviews and amendment votes, proposal feedback, easy wallet verified voting, treasury withdrawals, and more.

I do not want it to be glanced over that over 11M ADA was distributed via two multi-output, smart contract-enforced treasury withdrawal proposals, where the majority of members had to approve the transaction for it to execute. These treasury withdrawal proposals autonomously and seamlessly distributed funds to 34 addresses once the onchain quorum was reached.

Members participated through a platform that made governance accessible while maintaining the integrity of one-member, one-vote participation. The result was not just activity, but meaningful activity: votes, comments, meetings, public dashboards, and governance records that people could actually inspect. In Round 1 alone, there were over 1,000 comments, 1,285 votes, and 56 governance actions.

You can view all the action happening in the governance portals for each round!

Round 1: https://www.clarity.vote/organizations/cardano/CardanoBuilderDAO
Round 2: https://www.clarity.vote/organizations/cardano/CBDAORound2

That is not theoretical governance. That is governance happening.

And beyond the voting interface itself, I am especially proud of how we handled treasury execution.

DAO-Governed Treasury Withdrawals in Action

For all the talk in crypto about decentralization, very few organizations actually make treasury coordination simple, reliable, and visible.

We did.

By leveraging an open-source and audited governance framework on Cardano and wrapping it in an easy-to-use interface, DAO members were able to vote on treasury withdrawals in a way that was both user-friendly and credibly neutral.

If the execution threshold was reached, the treasury withdrawal executed automatically.

That is a huge deal.

In Round 1, the DAO executed a multi-output treasury withdrawal that funded approved projects via one governance action. The retrospective describes this as a DAO-governed treasury withdrawal that automatically executed a smart-contract treasury withdrawal to fund approved projects. (Medium)

This is one of the clearest proofs of what Clarity is trying to build more broadly: reliable interfaces around open governance rails that allow communities to coordinate capital without sacrificing transparency or decentralization.

The point is not just that funds moved.

The point is that they moved through a governance process that people could observe, participate in, and trust.

That is decentralized on-chain governance in action.

Transparency and Auditability

One really important aspect of the Cardano Builder DAO is Transparency and Auditability. Literally everything we do, you can look into, check, verify, and ask questions. We welcome feedback and criticism.

We post all member meetings in our Discord. We track KPIs. All governance actions can be viewed publicly. We are an open book that we encourage people to look into.

A great example of this is the milestone reports we provide to Intersect who acts as our budget administrator.

We provide evidence like:

Governance smart contracts deployed and publicly verifiable on Cardano

Treasury address established and operational

Membership units minted and distributed to all intended recipients

Public evidence links compiled for contracts, treasury, token policy, holders, and governance setup

Third-party assurance report completed, validating deployment and onboarding

We are really serious about providing everything we need to be auditable. You can check out one report here to get a sense of what I am talking about: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qncozGb_DMgm3ogVczvdLAOhCiEQaLhh6W2NtMiYzdc/edit?usp=sharing

Leadership, Stewardship, and the Hard Parts of the Job

On a personal level, leading and stewarding this DAO has been one of the most rewarding and challenging experiences of my career.

From the beginning, I have had the privilege and responsibility of helping guide the Cardano Builder DAO to where it is today. That has meant championing our commitment to transparency, KPI tracking, and an open but standardized membership process. It has also meant sitting in hard conversations, making decisions that not everyone agrees with, and trying to balance fairness, efficiency, and long-term credibility.

Every week, I get on calls with builders across the ecosystem.

We talk strategy.

We debate.

We challenge each other.

We work through difficult issues that do not always have clean answers.

That is the real work of governance.

Not slogans. Not surface-level decentralization. Actual stewardship.

And while that work can be exhausting, it is also deeply meaningful. Because what I see inside the Builder DAO is a group of people who care enough to show up and try to build a better standard.

Why This Matters Beyond the Builder DAO

The Cardano Builder DAO was never meant to be just another funding program.

It was meant to be a framework.

A proof point.

A demonstration that treasury capital can be deployed by domain experts through a transparent, metrics-first, on-chain process.

That idea matters not just for Cardano, but for the broader future of governance.

If we can show that funding can be allocated by informed voter bases, tied to measurable performance, executed transparently, and improved through iteration, then we are doing more than funding companies.

We are helping define what credible decentralized governance can look like.

To me, that is what makes this work worth it.

Gratitude and What Comes Next

I am deeply thankful to the dReps who gave us the opportunity to build.

I am grateful to the builders who believed in the idea early.

And I am proud of the Clarity team and everyone involved in stewarding this from a grassroots concept into a functioning DAO that has now completed two meaningful governance cycles.

We are not done.

There is still plenty to improve. There always will be.

But if you want to understand how far this DAO has come, I encourage you to talk to the builders, review the retrospectives, and study the process. What you will find is not a perfect system, but an honest one. A system that has iterated in public, faced criticism directly, improved where it needed to improve, and continued pushing toward a better model of funding.

I genuinely believe we are building one of the strongest frameworks in Cardano for metrics-first funding and for getting treasury capital into the right hands.

And as someone who helped take this from 0 to 1, that is something I am incredibly proud of, but the job is not done. Cardano is going for number 1.

Over the past several months, our team has been working alongside the Secretariat of Government and Digital Transformation of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers of Peru, and TechGob NGO, to explore how blockchain infrastructure can support national digital transformation mandates. What began as early-stage conversations has developed into a structured engagement spanning a national webinar on March 17 and a hands-on institutional workshop on March 31, both designed to move towards real-world implementation.

This work comes at a particularly relevant moment. Peru’s data governance framework has matured significantly over the past years, with new regulations explicitly requiring privacy-by-design in digital systems. For government agencies tasked with modernizing legacy infrastructure, this creates both urgency and opportunity.

To engage the broader public sector while establishing a shared foundation for the upcoming in-person workshop, we hosted a virtual webinar on March 17. The session brought together over 240 actors of the government digital transformation network and focused on demonstrating what our proposed blockchain infrastructure looks like in practice. We presented a live demo of a Clarity portal powered by Cardano and Midnight that showcased broad interoperability, verified credentials and selective data disclosure, illustrating how sensitive information can be validated without being exposed. The level of engagement confirmed a clear demand for solutions that are not only technically sound, but also aligned with the country’s regulatory direction.

This momentum carried directly into the in-person workshop hosted at the National School of Public Administration auditorium in Lima. From an initial pool of 40 applicants, 18 institutions were selected to participate based on the clarity and relevance of their problem statements. Each institution sent two representatives — one technical and one operational — ensuring that proposed solutions would reflect real implementation constraints rather than purely conceptual designs.

Over the course of an intensive 9-hour session on March 31 we saw these 18 institutions develop functional prototypes using blockchain infrastructure, technical capacities, and privacy-by-design principles. Each prototype addressed a challenge specific to their institution, ranging from judicial process traceability to credential verification and improvements in administrative transparency, results that were officially recognized by the Peruvian Government as a key milestone for the national digital agenda. A complete list of the 18 participating public entities is included at the conclusion of this blog post.

A key factor in the effectiveness of the workshop was the accelerated methodology used to guide participants from problem definition to solution design. Rather than relying on open-ended brainstorming, we introduced a structured framework that translated complex technical and regulatory requirements into tangible design inputs. Participants worked across multiple dimensions, including blockchain capabilities, interoperability, data regulation, and privacy-by-design constraints grounded in existing Peruvian law.

This approach ensured that each prototype was both technically viable and compliant from the outset, avoiding a common failure mode in digital transformation projects where regulatory considerations are deferred until later stages.

Taken together, the webinar and workshop demonstrate a model for how governments can approach digital transformation in a way that is grounded in regulation, informed by real institutional needs, and supported by modern blockchain infrastructure.

As the work now shifts from prototyping to production, this approach evolves into a repeatable framework for public sector innovation that can extend beyond a single country using Cardano and Midnight technology.

Participating Institutions
The following 18 organizations participated in the engagement. While 17 focused on developing functional prototypes, the Presidency of the Council of Ministers participated through three of its sub-secretariats.

1. Presidency of the Council of Ministers
2. Office of the Comptroller General of the Republic
3. Judiciary Branch of Peru
4. Tax Administration Service
5. National Jury of Elections
6. Ministry of Education
7. Ministry of Agrarian Development and Irrigation
8. National Council for Science, Technology and Innovation
9. National System of Evaluation, Accreditation and Certification of Educational Quality
10. National Center for Strategic Planning
11. National Port Authority
12. National University of San Marcos
13. Directorate of Integrated Health Networks Lima Sur
14. Geological, Mining and Metallurgical Institute
15. Social Targeting and Information Organization
16. Implementing Unit 118 for the Improvement of Quality in Basic and Higher Education
17. Pasco Public Technological Higher Education Institute
18. District Municipality of La Punta

Thank you for checking out the Clarity Blog! If you enjoy this content make sure to click that follow button.

dRep id: drep1y204jqvq0hu4m26gsaskmaas8vju2ls30hh2s0dhpj03t9qafvuzl**

What is Clarity?

Clarity blockchain governance consultancy which operates our flagship product, an out-of-the-box solution to manage community membership, incentives, governance, and rewards.

What type of person is a Clarity Community Member?

Clarity is a collection of entrepreneurial spirits that believe in the power of community and decentralized economies, and blockchain.

Who can use Clarity?

Some use cases we currently serve include governments, defi protocols, investment clubs, and grant DAOs.

Clarity can be leveraged across use cases due to the flexibility and versatility of the DAO organizational structure and the universal need to build community.

Join us on discord: https://discord.gg/sJV5KSGgDF

Subscribe to us on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQAYxsNUj6EAWcs8p6s36ig

Learn more on our website: https://www.clarity.community/

Follow us on X: https://twitter.com/clarity_dao

Stay updated with our blog: https://medium.com/@Clarity_

Follow us on Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@clarity.dao

Want to help us accelerate decentralized innovation? Get $CLARITY: https://www.dexhunter.io/

In the world of property management, the Homeowners Association (HOA) is often seen as a necessary hurdle; a system defined by paper trails, missed emails, and the constant struggle to reach a quorum. But what if the “foundation of a harmonious community” wasn’t found in a filing cabinet, but on the blockchain?

At Clarity, we are building the “Lego blocks” of smarter community governance. We’ve designed a turnkey platform to bridge the gap between residents, board members, and property managers, moving HOAs from confusion to consensus. However, the most exciting part of this evolution isn’t just the technology, it’s how we are making that technology invisible.

The Lynchpin: Frictionless Onboarding via UTXOS.dev

The biggest hurdle to blockchain adoption has always been the “barrier to entry.” For the average homeowner, managing seed phrases and digital wallets feels like a full-time job they didn’t apply for.

To solve this, Clarity has partnered with UTXOS.dev to create a revolutionary mobile application and an updated login flow. This partnership is the lynchpin of our strategy, enabling frictionless onboarding. Through their cutting-edge infrastructure, we are opening the door to blockchain rails without residents even needing to know they have a wallet.

UTXOS.dev is doing incredible work in the Cardano ecosystem, providing the essential developer tools and SDKs that transform complex cryptographic processes into intuitive, user-friendly experiences. Their commitment to building robust, scalable infrastructure is exactly what allows Clarity to bring decentralized governance to the mainstream.

Verifiable & Simple Digital Voting: Saving Time and Money

Tired of chasing proxies? Traditional HOA voting is notoriously inefficient. Between printing ballots, paying for postage, and the administrative labor of manual counting, a single vote can cost a medium-sized community anywhere from $1,500 to $5,000.

Clarity’s secure digital voting system changes the math:

• Convenience: Residents vote via the app, no more mail-in ballots or mandatory in-person attendance.
• Cost Savings: By moving to digital-first voting, communities can reduce their election overhead by up to 70%.
• Real-Time Quorum: Instead of waiting weeks for mail, boards can see results in real-time, reaching quorums faster and ensuring that every voice is legally and traceably heard.

Streamlining the ALC Process

The Architectural Landscape Committee (ALC) or Architectural Review Committee (ARC) process is often the biggest bottleneck in property management. In a traditional manual setup, the timeline from submission to approval typically takes 30 to 60 days. Between lost emails and incomplete forms, projects often stall before they begin.

Clarity automates this workflow, reducing the ALC process from months to just a few days.

• Custom Intake: Digital forms ensure homeowners submit all required info the first time.
• One-Click Approvals: Applications are instantly routed to board members for review and approval.
• Transparency: Homeowners can track their status in the app, eliminating the “black hole” of manual submissions.

Beyond the HOA: Driving Cardano Adoption

By centralizing communication through an announcement feed and simplifying complex legal processes, Clarity ensures that residents stay informed and boards govern with confidence.

But HOAs are just the beginning. At Clarity, we view community management as the first real-world use case that will drive cascading adoption of the Cardano blockchain. By proving that decentralized governance can work for a suburban neighborhood, we are laying the groundwork for blockchain to power cities, organizations, and global institutions.

Ready to build a better community? Let’s schedule a 10-minute demo to show you Clarity in action.

Thank you for checking out the Clarity Blog! If you enjoy this content make sure to click that follow button.

dRep id: drep1y204jqvq0hu4m26gsaskmaas8vju2ls30hh2s0dhpj03t9qafvuzl**

Join us on discord: https://discord.gg/sJV5KSGgDF

Subscribe to us on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQAYxsNUj6EAWcs8p6s36ig

Learn more on our website: https://www.clarity.community/

Follow us on X: https://twitter.com/clarity_dao

Stay updated with our blog: https://medium.com/@Clarity_

Follow us on Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@clarity.dao

Want to help us accelerate decentralized innovation? Get $CLARITY: https://www.dexhunter.io/

In December 2024, the Cardano ecosystem convened to ratify its founding Constitution. While the outcome relied on the security of the blockchain, the success of the event depended entirely on the user experience. Intersect MBO contracted Clear Contracts to architect a solution that solved a complex dual mandate: providing the immutable security of a distributed ledger while ensuring a seamless, frictionless experience for non-technical delegates.

The resulting voting system achieved a 100% success rate across a diverse, global cohort of delegates, demonstrating that high-assurance governance can be made accessible via standard mobile interfaces.

User-Centric Design and Global Accessibility

The primary challenge for the Constitutional Convention was the disparity in technical expertise among delegates hailing from over 50 nations. A complex, hardware-dependent voting mechanism would have introduced friction and potential failure points.

Clear Contracts addressed this by developing a mobile-optimized web application that functioned intuitively on delegates’ smartphones. By abstracting the complex cryptographic operations away from the user interface, the system ensured that the voting process was as simple as a standard digital survey, yet backed by the security of the Cardano blockchain.

Visual Demonstration: For a comprehensive overview of the application’s functionality and the user interface experienced by the delegates, refer to the video documentation below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkdjZYgxu6E

Live Interface: You may view the interface used by the delegates here: https://poll.cardanoconvention.com/polls/22

Performance Metrics

The rigorous focus on usability resulted in flawless execution during the live event. The application registered a 100% success rate, meaning every authorized delegate was able to cast their vote and have it recorded without technical error or obstruction. This metric is critical for government and enterprise observers, as it validates that blockchain-based governance is ready for deployment in high-stakes environments where accessibility cannot be compromised.

The Backend: Open Source and Immutable

While the frontend prioritized simplicity, the backend prioritized transparency. To ensure the legitimacy of the 100% success rate, the codebase was made open-source. This allows auditors to verify that the ease of use did not come at the cost of security or centralization.

Source Code Repository: https://github.com/ClearContracts/cardano-constitution-voting-app

Verification: The On-Chain Anchor

The seamless user experience on the frontend culminated in a permanent settlement on the backend. Once the mobile votes were aggregated, they were batched and anchored to the Cardano ledger. This proves that a user-friendly mobile app can successfully interface with a rigorous layer-1 blockchain to produce immutable records.

Proof of Result:

https://cardanoscan.io/transaction/50612b806f28d966d844c02f109d8550a12ff595f0e591b489e6487d32fd1a1f?tab=metadata

By inspecting the transaction metadata, the final count is visible in the message:

[ “Approval Result: 95%”,

“Yes Votes: 60”,

“No Votes: 3”,

“Abstain Votes: 0”,

“Total Eligible Voters: 63”, … ]

Each individual vote can be verified using information documented on each vote that was cast, to ensure Clear Contracts could not tamper with the results.

Here is an example of a transaction recording delegate vote signatures: https://cardanoscan.io/transaction/50612b806f28d966d844c02f109d8550a12ff595f0e591b489e6487d32fd1a1f?tab=metadata

Using standard public key cryptography, anyone can verify that the signature can be decoded with the public key to produce the original message, which indicates how the user voted.

Conclusion

The Cardano Constitutional Convention successfully demonstrated that the complexity of blockchain technology can be effectively abstracted for the end-user. By delivering a robust mobile application with a 100% success rate, Clear Contracts and Intersect have established a precedent: secure, decentralized governance tools can be both mathematically rigorous and universally accessible.

Thank you for checking out the Clarity Blog! If you enjoy this content make sure to click that follow button.

dRep id: drep1y204jqvq0hu4m26gsaskmaas8vju2ls30hh2s0dhpj03t9qafvuzl**

What is Clarity?

Clarity is an out-of-the-box solution to manage community membership, incentives, governance, and rewards.

What type of person is a Clarity Community Member?

Clarity is a collection of entrepreneurial spirits that believe in the power of community and decentralized economies.

Who can use Clarity?

Some use cases we currently serve include real estate investor syndicates, defi protocols, HOAs, investment clubs, youth soccer clubs, gaming studios, professional sports clubs, and meme communities.

Clarity can be leveraged across use cases due to the flexibility and versatility of the DAO organizational structure and the universal need to build community.

Join us on discord: https://discord.gg/sJV5KSGgDF

Subscribe to us on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQAYxsNUj6EAWcs8p6s36ig

Learn more on our website: https://www.clarity.community/

Follow us on X: https://twitter.com/clarity_dao

Stay updated with our blog: https://medium.com/@Clarity_

Follow us on Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@clarity.dao

Want to help us accelerate decentralized innovation? Get $CLARITY: https://www.dexhunter.io/

Context & Purpose

To unlock up to ₳275M in community-driven funding, Intersect proposed a governance poll asking DReps to choose a treasury withdrawal structure for Cardano’s 2025 budget cycle. Five options were presented, each with varying implications on efficiency, transparency, and governance complexity.

As dReps, we ultimately voted for Option C: Two Support Brackets with Two Withdrawals Each. This was not our ideal outcome, but a pragmatic compromise to balance governance load, community assurance, and forward momentum.

Why We Chose Option C (Compromise)

We believe Option C represents the most viable compromise that safeguards the integrity of decentralized governance without overburdening the system:

• It breaks the budget into two major tranches, giving room for community oversight and accountability.
• It avoids the bureaucratic inefficiency of dozens of individual proposals.
• It enables timely funding of ecosystem-critical work while retaining room for course correction.

Though we would have preferred a different model, Option C still upholds key values: efficiency, flexibility, and participation.

Our Preferred Model: Option A (Single Withdrawal)

Our ideal vote would have gone to Option A: Single Treasury Withdrawal, which we believe is the most efficient and scalable model for decentralized budgeting — once our reconciliation and review processes are improved.

Why a Single Withdrawal is Best:

• Execution Efficiency: Disburses funds swiftly to approved proposals without delay or procedural friction.
• Protocol Simplicity: Reduces overhead and minimizes voter fatigue.
• Budget Integrity: Keeps the focus on strategy, not bureaucracy.

However, this model only works if paired with a robust reconciliation process that filters for quality, alignment, and community legitimacy.

The Reconciliation Fix: Raise the Threshold

The current reconciliation threshold is set at 50%, which means many proposals can pass without clear majority consensus. This creates pressure to include contentious or weak proposals and undermines the legitimacy of the budget.

To make the single withdrawal model viable, we must:

• Raise the reconciliation threshold to at least match the treasury withdrawal approval requirement (67%).
• Ensure proposals reflect true community will before they reach execution.
• Preserve governance energy for strategic choices, not procedural redundancy.

With these adjustments, an omnibus withdrawal can become a powerful tool for swift, democratic budget execution.

Why We Oppose Option E: 39 Individual Withdrawals

We understand why Option E (39 individual treasury withdrawals) won this cycle; it’s our first run at decentralized budgeting, and caution is reasonable.

However, we believe this sets a dangerous precedent for future governance:

Short-Term Tolerable, Long-Term Harmful:

• 39 is manageable this year, but future rounds may require hundreds or even thousands of individual votes.
• This introduces:
• Voter Fatigue: Participation will plummet as decisions grow in volume.
• Delegation to Career Politicians: Concentrates power away from casual civic participants.
• Redundant Workflows: Mirrors reconciliation efforts, making the process bloated and inefficient.

Execution Bottlenecks:

Each proposal must secure 3.71B ADA in votes to pass. For context:

• The active voting stake is ≈ 5.5B ADA, assuming 6.3B abstain out of 11.8B.
• Reconciliation votes for IOHK’s proposals ranged from 2.2B to 3.7B ADA.
• Many proposals may fail due to vote dilution, stalling progress and wasting community energy.

A Better Future Process

To address these issues, we support the development of a more intentional and efficient governance pipeline, potentially incorporating AI-assisted executive functions:

1. Strategic Alignment: Community defines high-level annual goals (e.g. scalability, user growth, onchain activity, security).
2. Open Submission: Builders submit proposals aligned with priorities.
3. Temp Checks: Community feedback helps filter ideas early (e.g. via Ekkesia or Clarity).
4. AI-Augmented Review: A diverse set of governance personas (e.g. “Security Maximalist,” “DeFi Growth Advocate”) debate proposals and construct a model budget.
5. Final Approval: Human and AI outputs are reviewed, with a streamlined omnibus vote for execution.

This hybrid model respects decentralization while leveraging tools for scale and rigor.

Final Thoughts

The governance decision on the 2025 budget is a historic moment. While Option E may win the day, our vote for Option C reflects a belief in practical progress, not perfection. And our preference for Option A signals a strategic north star: a governance system that is lean, fair, and scalable but only when we build the supporting infrastructure to make it trustworthy.

We will continue working to improve these systems, ensuring Cardano’s governance evolves with integrity and efficiency.

Thank you for checking out the Clarity Blog! If you enjoy this content, make sure to click that follow button.

What is Clarity?

Clarity is an out-of-the-box solution to manage community membership, incentives, governance, and rewards. Clarity serves a wide range of communities — real estate investment groups, DeFi protocols, clubs, gaming studios, sports teams, and more. The platform is designed for those who believe in empowering decentralized communities.

Connect & Learn More:

Discord: discord.gg/sJV5KSGgDF

YouTube: Clarity YouTube

Website: clarity.community

X (Twitter): @clarity_dao

Blog: Medium

TikTok: @clarity.dao

Want to help accelerate decentralized innovation? Get $CLARITY: dexhunter.io

dRep id: drep1y204jqvq0hu4m26gsaskmaas8vju2ls30hh2s0dhpj03t9qafvuzl

The Cardano ecosystem has long been a pioneer in blockchain innovation. With decentralized governance implemented and the treasury unlocked, many things need to be funded and the community has to come up with effective and sustainable funding mechanisms. The ecosystem is already developing ways to fund things like open-source development, critical infrastructure, and innovation grants! There remains a gap when it comes to funding the projects that bring broader adoption, more transactions, and higher Total Value Locked (TVL) on Cardano.

Enter the Cardano Builder DAO (CB DAO) — a purpose-built, Smart Contract DAO-governed funding mechanism that advances Cardano by supporting and sustaining high-potential projects.

The Rationale Behind Cardano Builder DAO

To address a critical gap in Cardano’s governance and funding structure by providing specialized evaluation, strategic oversight, and sustainable funding pathways for high-potential projects. While existing committees serve vital functions in core protocol development, open source maintenance, and initial project funding, there remains no home for companies building the application that people use on Cardano.

Our Mission and Scope

Underpinning the CB DAO is a mission to encourage user adoption, foster TVL growth, and increase transaction volume on the Cardano Blockchain for the Cardano Community. This emphasis on tangible metrics and established projects distinguishes us from other funding structures. We operate with clear priorities in mind:

Funding High-Impact Initiatives
Through semi-annual budget proposals, we distribute resources to projects that can demonstrate on-chain activity and active user bases.

Community Collaboration & Accountability
By openly sharing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) — ranging from transaction counts to commit activity — funded projects remain accountable to both the DAO and the broader Cardano community.

Empowerment Through Decentralization
Governance decisions, including funding requests to treasury withdrawals, go through transparent voting processes enforced by on-chain smart contracts, ensuring that no single group can unilaterally control funds.

1. Goals & Key Performance Indicators

• Financial Support: Provide funding for development, growth, and operational costs of Cardano-based projects.
• Collaboration & Knowledge Sharing: Cultivate a community where expertise, accountability, and feedback flow among Cardano builders.
• KPIs: Projects receiving funds must track and report on metrics like on-chain transactions, active users, TVL, downloads, and commit activity. This ensures measurable impact and helps prioritize proposals that offer the greatest ecosystem benefit.

2. Membership Requirements

Membership in the CB DAO is open to companies operating functional Cardano dApps with real, active usage on mainnet. Once verified and approved via a Know Your Business (KYB) process and a technical review, new members receive governance tokens that grant voting and influence rights.

3. Governance Structure

CB DAO Board Elections

Members elect 3–7 board representatives before each yearly budget allocation. The board oversees membership approvals, compliance, and key governance actions.

Voting & Proposal System

Proposals for funding undergo a “temperature check” via a poll on the Clarity Platform. Meeting the required voting threshold of at least 15% of DAO members is essential, and successful proposals must have more upvotes than downvotes to proceed.

Treasury Withdrawals
If a proposal passes the temperature check, the board compiles a withdrawal request. 51% of all DAO members must approve before smart contracts release the funds. This stringent requirement safeguards against misallocation of resources.

Sunsetting & Unused Funds
Any treasury funds left unspent at the end of the budget period are returned to the Cardano Treasury, and the CB DAO is dissolved for that cycle, ensuring funds are not indefinitely locked away.

4. Treasury & Funding

On-Chain Deposits: The treasury is established using ADA allocated to CB DAO from the Cardano Treasury. A treasury deposit would flow directly into the smart contract governed treasury. The CB DAO will leverage an Agora DAO to collectively govern funds.

Member Staking: Each verified member receives one fungible governance token that must be held and staked throughout the budget period, aligning incentives with the DAO’s success.

Semi-Annual Funding: Projects submit proposals detailing their roadmap, budget, and KPIs. Previously funded initiatives must also report progress to be considered for renewed support.

5. Legal Structure

To bolster credibility and safeguard its members, the CB DAO intends to form as a Wyoming Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) or a similar legal structure. This framework:

• Recognizes the DAO as a separate legal entity with limited liability for its members.
• Facilitates governance using smart contracts, aligning with the decentralized ethos of Cardano.

Looking Ahead

We are set to support and sustain Cardano’s evolving dApp ecosystem. Here’s a brief look at our yearly operating cycle:

• Membership Cohort Approval and Board Elections
• New Member Application Windows and Semi-Annual Funding Polls
• Project KPI Tracking and Status Updates
• Treasury Withdrawals and Budget Period Conclusion

This rhythm ensures that critical governance actions — from membership approvals to distributing funds — are conducted in a predictable, transparent manner.

Conclusion: Building the Future Together

If you’re a builder, innovator, or stakeholder looking to shape Cardano’s future, the CB DAO invites you to:

• Join as a Member: If you have a functional dApp that needs funding, expertise, or both.
• Contribute Governance: Every membership token has weight in the DAO’s proposals and decisions.
• Champion Ecosystem Adoption: Support the next generation of dApps destined to bring real users, higher TVL, and vibrant on-chain activity to Cardano.

By working together under a clear, rational, and forward-thinking framework, the CB DAO aims to ensure that Cardano remains a leader in blockchain technology — now and into the future.

Note from the Author:

Thanks for reading, this funding mechanism has been my brainchild and I hope others know it can help the ecosystem as much as I know it can. We need products that create transactions for this decentralized network state thing to work.

I wanted to provide a specific note that decisions regarding CB DAO and how it works are in their infancy. For example, we must decide on whether a project can receive both CB DAO and Catalyst Funding at the same time. CB DAO is meant to be a complement to the existing community-driven funding options for the Cardano Ecosystem.

Lastly, if you are a builder, get in touch here: https://forms.gle/V4QDBn1ojzXmQwKH7 or contact me or anyone from the projects below!

Early Supporters/Potential Members

• ADA Handle
• NMKR
• Indigo
• TapTools
• Flux Point Studios
• Intersect
• Clarity

Written by: Logan Panchot

In the rapidly evolving realm of decentralized governance, Cardano has always stood out for its visionary commitment to community-led decision-making. As we embark on the next chapter of Cardano’s evolution, we find ourselves with an exciting opportunity — one that calls for diverse funding mechanisms to foster growth, encourage innovation, and strengthen the Cardano network on multiple fronts. This is where the Cardano Funding Funnel comes into play.

A Visual Metaphor for Sustained Growth

I included the video above if you want to see it!

Imagine a dynamic, spinning funnel composed of three vibrant layers:

1. Blue/Purple Layer: Innovation & Partnerships
2. Green Layer: DApps & Transaction-Producing Services
3. Pink Layer: Core Infrastructure & Security

As this funnel spins, it releases seeds that plant a flourishing tree, surrounded by smaller plants. Each seed represents a project or initiative that takes root and grows into its own ecosystem, ultimately strengthening Cardano from the inside out. These interconnected ecosystems reflect the network’s holistic approach to decentralized governance and long-term sustainability.

Blue/Purple Layer: Innovation and Partnerships

The first layer, colored in blue/purple, represents the spirit of innovation and collaboration that drives Cardano. Project Catalyst has already set a high bar for what community-powered innovation can achieve, by enabling:

• Funding for Experimentation: Providing early-stage capital for trailblazing ideas that might otherwise remain unrealized.
• Support for Collaboration: Encouraging partnerships among researchers, developers, and community enthusiasts across the globe.
• Idea Validation: Ensuring that proposals are evaluated, refined, and guided to success by the wisdom of the crowd.

This layer ensures that Cardano remains on the cutting edge — always ready to adopt new technologies, test new methods, and partner with others to accelerate progress.

Green Layer: DApps & Transaction-Producing Services

Next is the green layer, dedicated to the dApps and services that generate on-chain activity. Just as leaves on a tree are crucial for photosynthesis and energy production, these projects keep Cardano’s economic engine running. By:

• Attracting Users: An intuitive and rewarding user experience encourages broader adoption and turns curious newcomers into long-term participants.
• Fueling Transactions: Whether it’s DeFi protocols, NFTs, or specialized enterprise solutions, increased on-chain activity drives new revenue streams and bolsters the Cardano treasury.
• Cultivating Revenue: Greater usage results in more transaction fees, feeding back into the system as rewards for stakeholders and expanding the overall funding pool.

In essence, the green layer ensures that Cardano remains a flourishing hub for applications that can scale and draw consistent activity.

Pink Layer: Core Infrastructure & Security

Beneath the vibrant surface, the pink layer represents the foundational components — core infrastructure and security. This layer underpins everything else, ensuring that:

• Network Reliability: Protocol-level upgrades and ongoing maintenance keep Cardano efficient, robust, and capable of handling ever-increasing demand.
• Security Upgrades: From preventing bad actors to responding swiftly to emerging threats, this layer protects the integrity of the network.
• Long-Term Stability: Continuous infrastructure development ensures Cardano remains relevant and capable of supporting a rapidly expanding ecosystem.

While sometimes overlooked in the excitement of new applications, this layer is essential for longevity and trust. A strong foundation means every seed has fertile ground in which to grow.

Planting Seeds for a Thriving Network

As the funnel spins, it disperses seeds representing the many initiatives funded by these diverse mechanisms. Over time, each seed grows into its own ecosystem, branching out and creating new possibilities for Cardano. Together, these thriving ecosystems feed back into the funnel, strengthening each layer — be it fueling more innovation, generating more transactions, or reinforcing core infrastructure.

At the heart of this cyclical process is the recognition that all three layers must work together. Innovation without security is precarious, and security without real-world use cases slows momentum. DApps without robust infrastructure cannot scale, while an absence of community-backed innovation stifles new opportunities.

Prioritizing Network Growth and Treasury Health

A critical aspect of this process is nurturing projects that bring in users and on-chain transactions. To build a sustainable network state:

• More Users & Transactions → Increased Network Rewards
• Increased Rewards → Growth of the Treasury
• Growing Treasury → More Funding Available for Innovation & Infrastructure

This positive feedback loop ensures that as Cardano expands, so do its resources to support the next wave of breakthroughs. By prioritizing high-impact projects — especially those that facilitate real-world adoption — we create a vibrant, resilient, and future-proof ecosystem.

Embrace the Funnel Mentality

In this new era of decentralized governance, the Cardano Funding Funnel exemplifies how diverse funding mechanisms can work in harmony. When each layer — innovation, applications, and infrastructure — aligns, the result is a self-reinforcing cycle of growth that continually benefits the entire network.

Through this funnel, we plant the seeds for sustainable development, empowering new ideas and partnerships to take root and flourish. As these seeds mature into flourishing projects, they further enrich the Cardano ecosystem, ensuring our treasury remains robust and our community continues to thrive — today and far into the future.

Now is the time to embrace the funnel mentality. By cultivating synergy across different funding layers, we make Cardano a beacon of decentralized innovation, transaction growth, and solid infrastructure for years to come.

Thank you for checking out the Clarity Blog! If you enjoy this content make sure to click that follow button.

dRep id: drep1y204jqvq0hu4m26gsaskmaas8vju2ls30hh2s0dhpj03t9qafvuzl**

What is Clarity?

Clarity is an out-of-the-box solution to manage community membership, incentives, governance, and rewards.

What type of person is a Clarity Community Member?

Clarity is a collection of entrepreneurial spirits that believe in the power of community and decentralized economies.

Who can use Clarity?

Some use cases we currently serve include real estate investor syndicates, defi protocols, investment clubs, youth soccer clubs, gaming studios, professional sports clubs, and meme communities.

Clarity can be leveraged across use cases due to the flexibility and versatility of the DAO organizational structure and the universal need to build community.

Join us on discord: https://discord.gg/sJV5KSGgDF

Subscribe to us on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQAYxsNUj6EAWcs8p6s36ig

Learn more on our website: https://www.clarity.community/

Follow us on X: https://twitter.com/clarity_dao

Stay updated with our blog: https://medium.com/@Clarity_

Follow us on Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@clarity.dao

Want to help us accelerate decentralized innovation? Get $CLARITY: https://www.dexhunter.io/

We are voting no on this proposal because now is not the right time to reduce the treasury cut. With an upcoming budget that will withdraw a significant amount of funds from the treasury, it is essential to first evaluate the impact of these withdrawals over the coming year. While increasing staking rewards is attractive, maintaining a robust treasury is critical for funding projects and core infrastructure that underpin Cardano’s long-term growth. Reducing the treasury cut now risks compromising our ability to support these vital areas, and therefore, we believe it is prudent to delay any changes until we have a clearer understanding of the treasury’s performance post-budget.

**Thank you for checking out the Clarity Blog! If you enjoy this content make sure to click that follow button.

dRep id: drep1y204jqvq0hu4m26gsaskmaas8vju2ls30hh2s0dhpj03t9qafvuzl**

What is Clarity?

Clarity is an out-of-the-box solution to manage community membership, incentives, governance, and rewards.

What type of person is a Clarity Community Member?

Clarity is a collection of entrepreneurial spirits that believe in the power of community and decentralized economies.

Who can use Clarity?

Some use cases we currently serve include real estate investor syndicates, defi protocols, investment clubs, youth soccer clubs, gaming studios, professional sports clubs, and meme communities.

Clarity can be leveraged across use cases due to the flexibility and versatility of the DAO organizational structure and the universal need to build community.

Join us on discord: https://discord.gg/sJV5KSGgDF

Subscribe to us on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQAYxsNUj6EAWcs8p6s36ig

Learn more on our website: https://www.clarity.community/

Follow us on X: https://twitter.com/clarity_dao

Stay updated with our blog: https://medium.com/@Clarity_

Follow us on Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@clarity.dao

Want to help us accelerate decentralized innovation? Get $CLARITY: https://www.dexhunter.io/