Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep;29(5):327-334.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.03.004.

Religious Attendance as Reproductive Support

Affiliations

Religious Attendance as Reproductive Support

Jason Weeden et al. Evol Hum Behav. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

We argue that a central function of religious attendance in the contemporary U.S. is to support a high-fertility, monogamous mating strategy. Although religious attendance is correlated with many demographic, personality, moral, and behavioral variables, we propose that sexual and family variables are at the core of many of these relationships. Numerous researchers have assumed that religious socialization causes people to feel moral reactions and engage in behaviors promoted by religious groups. On our view, mating preferences are centrally involved in individual differences in attraction to religious groups. In a sample of 21,131 individuals who participated in the U.S. General Social Survey, sexual behaviors were the relatively strongest predictors of religious attendance, even after controlling for age and gender. Effects of age and gender on religious attendance were weaker, and substantially reduced when controlling for sexual and family patterns. A sample of 902 college students provided more detailed information on religious, moral, and sexual variables. Results suggest that 1) moral views about sexual behavior are more strongly linked to religious attendance than other moral issues, and 2) mating strategy is more powerful than standard personality variables in predicting religious attendance. These findings suggest that reproductive strategies are at the heart of variations in religious attendance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Atran S. In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
    1. Boyer P. Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books; 2001.
    1. Buss DM. Sex, marriage, and religion: What adaptive problems do religious phenomena solve? Psychological Inquiry. 2002;13:201–203.
    1. Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review. 1993;100:204–232. - PubMed
    1. Casper LM, Bianchi SM. Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.

LinkOut - more resources