Asset allocation

The crypto-enthusiast’s mantra—“just add Bitcoin and watch the efficient frontier fly”—runs into a hard empirical wall when you extend the sample, tighten the econometrics, and force the asset to compete on identical risk-adjusted footing with equities. Alistair Milne’s new SSRN paper applies a textbook Markowitz mean–variance framework to a two-asset universe (S&P 500 vs. Bitcoin) and finds that the ex-ante optimal long-term weight on BTC is not merely small; it is outright negative. In other words, a rational, variance-averse allocator who believes expected returns equal historical equity premia plus a fair compensation for BTC’s non-diversifiable volatility should be short, not long, the flagship digital token.

Market concentration has become one of the most discussed structural risks in today’s equity markets. A small group of mega-cap stocks—often the largest five to ten names—now accounts for an unusually large share of major market indices. This has led to widespread concerns that such concentration makes markets more fragile and that elevated index weights at the top may foreshadow weaker future returns. Many investors worry that history is repeating itself and that extreme concentration today implies disappointment tomorrow.

This article develops a price-based macro–financial model of gold that formally links its medium-horizon return dynamics to cross-asset risk-premium configurations. Although gold has traditionally been conceptualized as a non-yielding inflation hedge or safe-haven asset, contemporary empirical evidence reveals a substantially more intricate structure: gold’s forward returns are systematically conditioned by the joint momentum of (i) gold itself and (ii) long-duration U.S. Treasury total-return indices. The alignment of these two signals appears to encode macroeconomic information—specifically the direction of real interest rates, the stance and expected trajectory of Federal Reserve policy, and the prevailing global risk-appetite regime.

One year is again behind us (in this case, it was 2025), and we are all a little older (and hopefully richer and/or wiser). Turn-of-the-year period is usually an excellent time for a short recap. Over the past 12 months, we have kept our pace and published nearly 70 short analyses of academic papers and our own research articles. So let’s summarize 10 of them, which were the most popular (based on the Google Analytics ranking). The top 10 is diverse, as usual; once again, we hope that you may find something you have not read yet …

In Understanding Gold, Claude B. Erb and Campbell R. Harvey examine gold’s enduring reputation as a safe-haven asset and contrast popular narratives with empirical evidence. While gold has preserved purchasing power over millennia—what the authors call the “golden constant”—this does not translate into reliable short- or medium-term inflation hedging. Gold’s volatility is comparable to equities, while inflation itself is far more stable, making gold an unreliable hedge over typical investor horizons. The key insight is that gold’s real long-run return is approximately zero, which is precisely what one should expect from a hedging asset rather than a growth asset.

In recent times, we have observed heightened volatility across financial markets. Concerns surrounding government shutdowns, as well as the uncertainty they create, do little to calm these fluctuations. Rather than being purely disruptive, however, such events raise an intriguing question: could these episodes of political and economic uncertainty actually be leveraged to our advantage in investment strategies? In this article, we will examine several asset classes and attempt to assess whether this phenomenon provides a sufficiently relevant signal for investment decisions.