Was the cancellation of Palestinian writer Abdel-Fatah at the Adelaide Writers’ Week an act of racial discrimination?

Leave a reply

No, it was not.

Despite the brouhaha around Fattah’s dis-invitation, it is as well to point out first and foremost that she was not dropped because she was Arab, Muslim or a “Palestinian”(sic).

She was dis-invited because her presence promoted an ideological monoculture.

She was not dropped, despite her protestations to make capital of her part-Egyptian heritage, because she was “the only Palestinian” on the ticket, not because of who she was, but because of what she said. That she could be provided a prestigious platform to repeat things she said around 7 weeks after the ISIS-inspired massacre of Jews on the sands of Bondi, certainly didn’t help the optics.

So, what sort of things did  pshe say and how did she score an invite under the Jewish directorship of Louise Adler, an avowed “anti-Zionist” in the first place?.

Well, in the days after October 7, as well as in Jan 2024, Fattah said she did not regard Hamas as a terror organisation, she had pride in what happened, she changed her  facebook profile pic to an October 7 terrorist paraglider with the colours of the Palestinian flag, and she denied outright that Israeli women and girls had been raped or tha the men had been bastardised.

Also in 2024, after more Hamas Go-Pro footage increasingly revealed just how the Muslim terrorists murdered, raped, burned, looted, bastardised and beheaded 1,200 Jews aged 8 months to 85 years old  and took 251 Jews hostage, babes and Holocaust survivors alike, into the tunnels of Gaza, Fattah stated in a Mondoweiss (surprise!) essay, “If you ask me about hope, there was a glimmer on October 7. It was palpable, real and exhilarating.” She then added, using the language of jihad/holy war, that “Palestinian” (sic) children killed in Israel’s early response, were “martyrs”.

Her 2025 New Year message to her followers called for “the end of Israel” and “the abolishment of the death cult of Zionism”, adding that Zionists had “no claim or right to cultural safety”. This after helping dox the personal conversations and information of 600 Jewish Australian creatives and academics, leading young children ostensibly on a “school excursion” in April 2024 with chants of “intifada” at Sydney University, successfully petitioning the 2024 Perth Festival’s Literature and Ideas program calling for the cancelling and removal of Jewish musician Deborah Conway over her support for Israel, and signing a letter in 2024 dis-inviting Jewish author and 3 time Pulitzer prize winner for the NYT, Tom Friedman, from Writers’ Week who was then cancelled.

There really is no need to add more, so the question remains how she was invited to speak in Adelaide, South Australia in the first place?

Under the directorship of self-described anti-Zionist Jewish director  Louise Adler, who studied under antisemite Edward Said, the Adelaide Writers’ Week (AWW) morphed into a forum which boycotted all Israeli and Jewish writers and creatives. AWW was effectively turned into a politically and ideologically motivated blacklist.

Adler and AWW appear to have been motivated less by free speech or open debate than by protecting and amplifying particular political narratives.

And even if Adler and the AWW board would have liked the public to believe they were protecting “free speech” (because that evokes ‘integrity’), what they were actually hermetically cocooning was ideology and tribalism.

Adler burned AWW with her 2023 invite to documented antisemitic Palestinian-American author Susan Abulhawa who had described a Jewish-American civilian shot by terrorists while attending a family wedding in Israel as “human garbage” who did not deserve to be mourned……

Adler hijacked AWW and wedded it to the anti-Israel Free Palestine crusade that followed October 7, 2023.

That crusade led to persecuting Jewish members of its own fraternity who did not renounce their ethnic identity, ostracising them by cancelling music and theatre performances and excluding them from events.

AWW, basking in the glow of their self righteousness and egos, ended up victimising one of its most successful immigrant groups, the Jews.

And Federal Labor in Australia, with FM Penny Wong publicly chastising Israel locally and on the international stage, and changing Australia’s hitherto bipartisan policy on Palestine, effectively furthered the anti-Jewish climate of opinion that roiled Australia over 2½ years, and legitimised and even encouraged turning a blind eye to large, sometimes violent, weekly demonstrations detouring through Jewish suburbs to intimidate the locals.

For his part, however, what South Austraian Labor Premier Peter Malinauskas said was that he did “not support the inclusion of those who actively undermine the cultural safety of others, who celebrate the death of innocent civilians or those who dox other artists simply because of their faith or cultural background.”

And, unlike his Federal counterparts, what Malinauskas did in South Australia in supporting the dis-invitation of Abdel-Fatah to AWW 2025 (only after he was asked for his opinion) so soon after the ISIS inspired massacre on the sands of Bondi, was a last line defence of decency as a political leader who stayed true to his resolve to defend the greater social good.

How has the Gaza war now re-shaped and changed Israel’s security doctrine?

Leave a reply

As 2025 comes to a close, this piece reflects on how 2025, apart from being one of the bloodiest years in terms of worldwide terrorism, has witnessed the birth of a new ME in terms of Israel’s place in it.

Israeli security policy is shifting from containment to proactive disruption of threats. Essentially, the policy shift favours the continuous and systematic dismantling of enemy capabilities as they are being built, both near and far from Israel’s borders.

This is so because there is little question that Muslims across the West in Europe, America and Australia, have got their tails up and feel they have the wind at their backs as the intifada (aka ‘kill the Jew’) has been globalised.

Not only are Jews attacked, but Muslims for the past 25 years or so, and increasingly, have increased the number of attacks on Christians, on minorities, Kurds, Druze, Yazidis around the world, but primarily in the Middle East, Africa and Asia.

Image

Aftermath of Boko Haram attack

In the Antipodes, Bondi 14 Dec 2025 emphasised the reach of the global assault on Israel and the Jewish people in that the war against the Jews was shown to have moved far beyond the battlefield in Israel—and into courtrooms, international bodies, diverse nations and financial systems worldwide.

Image

Bondi memorial, Dec 2025

However, Israel is not sitting back and taking it.

What is emerging from Jerusalem in 2026 is a new Israeli Regional Policy 78 years in the making.

In the ongoing arm wrestle against persistent Muslim attempts to destroy it, Israel’s security doctrine no longer consists of sitting back behind its borders and merely responding after being attacked.

It is now projecting power in the backyards of her enemies and is systematically now bringing the threat of Israeli retaliation much closer to them in Iran/Turkey (Azerbaijan), Yemen (Somaliland) and Turkey (South Syria).

Israeli military doctrine post Gaza 2023 and especially post Iran June 2025, reveals a wide-ranging reformulation of military concepts, regional economic alliances, and strategic military initiatives.

They reflect a shift from strategies of containment and mutual deterrence toward more offensive, pre-emptive approaches focused on preventive destruction and economic co-dependence.

For example, Turkish PM Erdogan’s plans and dreams of expansion in Syria remain murky and unstable and potentially explosive at worst vis a vis Israel in part because of Israeli support for the Druze fighting Syrian Bedouin clans in Suwayda, South Syria, further undermining Turkish ambitions there.

Image

Fighting in Suwayda, South Syria

But not only there. Turkish influence, military and infrastructure support in Somalia over decades appears impotent against Israel’s geopolitical power move of formal Israeli recognition of Somaliland. This geopolitical reconfiguration and strategic alliance fundamentally alters the balance of power in the crucial trade route shipping region of the Horn of Africa just as the Israel-Azerbaijan partnership in the South Caucasus transcends traditional regional dynamics.

Image

Location location, location….

Closer to home, Israel is making aggressive Turkish PM Erdogan even more paranoid as Greece and Cyprus deepen their ties with Israel, reinforcing Israel’s growing role in Mediterranean energy and maritime trade and military security. The Trilateral Summit and Missile Deployments in Greece and Cyprus (December 22-24) had leaders from the three countries sign wide-ranging agreements to deepen security, defense, and military cooperation to explicitly counter Turkish aggression in the Eastern Mediterranean.

This is further cemented by Egypt signing a major gas deal with Israel and while this has created a rift within the Muslim world between Ankara and Cairo, the agreement has nevertheless significantly strengthened Israel’s position as a regional energy player

And when you add to the mix, Israel’s mutually beneficial relations with Shia Muslim Azerbaijan where Azerbaijani oil is traded for advanced Israeli weaponry, Sunni Turkey suddenly finds itself a little too close to Israel; and not in the ways Erdogan’s incendiary speechmaking envisioned (Erdogan: “We shall make the Jews kneel before us again” (in Jerusalem)).

Image

Erdogan stirring up the masses post Oct 7, 2023

And, absolutely against the run of play over the past 26 months, as Israel fought on seven fronts simultaneously, affirmative Israeli action diplomatically put a serious dent to any neo-Ottoman fantasies Ankara might have held even as is still presses Trump to be part of the ISF in Gaza……

As far as Iran is concerned, Iran is all too aware of its near-800 km long border with Azerbaijan which provides Israeli agents an ability to infiltrate the Islamic Republic.

Image

As well, Azerbaijan is very willing to host listening stations and allow Iranians to leave their country to meet with Israelis. Iraqi Kurdistan’s border with Iran is about 500 kilometres long and far more porous and more conducive to infiltrate agents. And Azerbaijan’s advocacy for ethnic Azeris in Iran is also concern for the regime because the Azeri population of Iran is 50 percent greater than the entire population of independent Azerbaijan itself.

And so, as 2025 draws to a close, Israel signs off on two years of active war in a relatively strong position militarily even as it has a lot of work to do to claw back some of its international standing in the face of a relentless and well organised (two days after Oct 7, masses across Europe demonstrated for a “ceasefire” and an end to “genocide” when the full-scale Israeli ground manoeuvre only started 20 days later) Qatari and Chinese funded media hate campaign.

The events of October 7 marked a total collapse of the basic principles of Israel’s national security doctrine. Three of the four basic components – deterrence, early warning, and defense – failed completely.

October 7 2023 exposed IDF and Israeli governmental hubris and destroyed what Israelis call the “conceptsia”, the failure of which led to the massacre and atrocities. But in its wake, and especially after the 12 day Iran war, it gave rise to an evolving new security doctrine where mere risk management ON its borders was replaced by active deterrence at point of origin.

2025 was an exceedingly violent year worldwide, and without wanting to do a “Cassandra” here, in 2026 the Middle East is entering another period of heightened tensions with the usual players involved: Israel, Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen, alongside armed non-state actors where Hezbollah and Hamas refuse to disarm and the Houthis, Somalia and Turkey apoplectic at Israeli moves in Somaliland.

No point ignoring the warning lights, but also no point not to go out and celebrate New Year’s Eve with family and friends tonight.

Have fun. Be safe.

The Chinese factor: visceral antisemitism and the Gaza war

1 Reply

As 2025 draws to a close, conflicts and conflicting narratives roil the international order with little in the future which suggests that 2026 will be much better.

Social media propaganda by state and bad-faith non-state actors vie for primacy of position in the public mind. The conflict in Ukraine continues, Muslim Turkey has turned ideology against a neighbour into sabre rattling and strategic military threats, Muslim Pakistan threatens India, and nobody does anything of significance in curbing Muslim massacres in Sudan and Nigeria.

Muslim Iran, humiliated, blunted and exposed, is looking for revenge against a tiny non-Muslim state 1,600 km away by air, and Europe, America and Australia are under attack from what some analysts refer to as the international Muslim Brotherhood’s (MB) 100 year plan of strategic entryism into North America and Europe.

Here, the reference is to the Muslim Brotherhood (hosted and funded by Qatar and supported by Turkey) not merely as a political movement, but as a transnational ideological project that adapts itself to Western systems while working to undermine them using the very freedoms of democracy as tools to erode it from within, exploiting the tolerance and openness of liberal societies as strategic vulnerabilities.

Increasingly, Turkey and Qatar with its state propaganda arm, al Jazeera, are increasingly being viewed by many as enablers and funders of terrorism and unrest. And, to this we add China’s surprising (but not surprising when examined) antisemitic exploitation of the Israel -Hamas war to weaken Christianity and the west through its use of anti-Israel antisemitic bot farms (funded by left wing millionaire Sri Lankan expat Neville Roy Singham’s Chinese Communist Party-affiliated network which also organized campus groups after the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023).

NB. Singham’s funded other organizations like The People’s Forum, ANSWER Coalition, International People’s Assembly to function as conduits through which these CCP-affiliated entities co-opted pro-Palestinian activism to advance anti-Western, anti-American, and anti-democratic agendas.

But more than anything, while all the above serves to highlight that the threat from Islamists, allied to a coalition of Marxists, right-wingers and Muslims who take great pains to downplay or deny this connection, threatens more than just Israel, it is Israel which is (again) the West’s canary in the coal mine as it continues to hold the front lines of a global conflict between Islamists and the West.

Thus the concomitant rise in visceral antisemitism is not about the U.S.- Israel alliance or the war in Gaza, but part of a broader effort to disarm and divert Americans and Europe from the peril that Islamists pose to their countries and Western civilization. And it is here that China’s role in the fomenting antisemitism is examined.

While not historically a country known for its antipathy to Jews, since October 7, a lot of pro Hamas protests were being funded by China where bot farms worked 24/7 to amplify coarse antisemitism. Per Adam Lovinger of the Gold Institute for International Strategy (GISS, 25 Nov, 2025), as an outcome of a 1990 closed door high level military strategy meeting, what arose was their discovery that every great power that attempted to destroy the Jewish people, had themselves been destroyed: the Pharaohs, the Syrian Empire, the Babylonian Empire, the Seleucid Empire, the Roman Empire, the Spanish Empire after the Inquisition and Nazi Germany………

So, the thinking was that if only China could turn China’s enemies against the Jewish people, they could destroy China’s enemies indirectly.

And, for China, one of its biggest enemies is Christianity which it views as the greatest strategic threat to the CCP.

With the population’s disillusion with Communism, the collapse of Soviet Marxism, ordinary Chinese were increasingly turning to Christianity as an anchor.

This threatened the CCP’s tight control of the population and so social media was the chosen battleground to split and divide America and European Christendom to undermine western civilisation as a whole targeting the Jewish Christian alliance, the effective moral backbone of western democracy.

Israel has not taken all this lying down. It has put into play a game plan of its own which has shredded both Iranian sense of security and severely disrupted Turkey’s intended creeping hegemony and dreams of empire in Syria and the Horn of Africa.

But that will have to be the subject of a follow-up post.

In what ways did the Australian Labor government contribute to the Hanukkah Bondi Beach massacre?

Leave a reply

Clearly, to understand the lead up to the tragedy, it is necessary to understand  the ways the Australian government effectively cultivated a political and and ideological climate in the country over 26 months which led to the Bondi beach Hanukkah massacre of Jews.

Whether this was deliberate policy or simply fear of alienating a targeted domestic voting demographic is the subject of a,whole different debate.

But, for the purposes of this article, the thing to be stated is, when incitement is tolerated, minimized, or left unchallenged by a federal government, it creates an enabling environment for violence on the streets.

In Australia, all three occured.

The Bondi massacre was the foreseeable consequence of broiling antisemitism allowed to metastasize under Albanese’s Labor government which treated the developing terrorist campaign as a community relations problem rather than the ideological and institutional problem it was.

Albanese and his Foreign Minister Penny Wong consistently did their utmost in the twenty-six months since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel, to signal their  lack of interest in the well-being of Jewish communities, in Israel, Australia, and beyond.

Specifically, on October 9, 2023, two days after Hamas’s massacre in Israel, a mob descended on the Sydney Opera House, burning Israeli flags and chanting threats against Jews while police advised the Jewish community to stay away rather than dispersing the crowd. That failure to enforce basic public order established the permissive environment for everything that followed.

More, in August 2025, Labor MPs past and present went so far as to march under ISIS flags and a placard of the leader of a state sponsor of terrorism Khamenei, alongside Islamic jihadists across the Sydney Harbour Bridge (image below), as chants openly called for Israel’s destruction.

Image
Image

Essentially, Albanese’s studied inaction, together with continual condemnation of Israel by his ministers Wong and Burke, emboldened extremists and Jew- haters and left Australia’s Jewish communities dangerously exposed.

In Australia, a feckless Labor government under a weak and divisive leader caved to constituencies that lauded violence, even as Labor refused to repudiate the hatred that came from the Muslim voting demographic Labor was so assiduously courting.

Together with this, the Australian courts allowed marches in the streets calling for “resistance” and a globalised “intifada” (killing of Jews), and state-funded media/TV stations provided daily inflammatory abd one-sided coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict.

This contributed to the deaths of the Sydney Jews.

Image

For their part, University administrators allowed exclusionary and deeply antisemitic encampments on their campuses for months at a time while their Jewish staff and students were doxxed and attacked.

Meanwhile, academics worked hard to redefine Zionism not as anti-colonial self determination, but as “Jewish supremacy”.

They pushed the mainstreaming of blood libels about Israel committing “genocide”, often couched in the language of human rights,
in a disingenuous effort to make Jew-hatred acceptable among those who think of themselves as decent people, rather than bigoted Jew-haters.

Arts bodies drove out their Jewish stakeholders unless they complied with political tests while painted murals on walls in Sydney depicted Jews as parasites and grafitti in Sydney and Melbourne called to kill and “Gas the Jews”.

Image
Image

Police failed to enforce laws or prosecute consequences against the public display of terrorist or Nazi symbols, and schools allowed the politicisation of their classrooms by staff asserting a genocide by Israel to their students during school hours.

And so, taking its cue from a Labor government heavily invested in its Muslim voting demographic, Australian society failed Jews at every level.

Now, after the obligatory hand wringing and tsunami of meaningless “thoughts and prayers” from the very people who did nothing to publicly condemn the growing hate over 26 months, 15 people lost their lives and 42 were taken to hospital.

Ironically, the two ethnic Pakistani Muslims targeted Jews celebrating Hanukkah, the (his)story of a bloody war waged 2,190 years ago to resist an attempt by the ruling Hellenists to wipe out Judaism and Jewish identity.

The rebellion led by Mattathias and the Maccabees, did so to preserve their people and faith against the powerful cultural forces of Hellenism, much like like Israel and Jews worldwide today persevere against the violent attempts of  Palestinianism to extirpate Judaism and Jewish identity.

From the river to the sea. 

Safe, beautiful, laid back Australia should never have had this tragedy occur, and certainly not amongst one of its most well integrated and loyal minorities.

The Jewish community pleaded for 2 years for something to be done and highlighted that Albanese “recognising” a non-existent state was a reward for terrorism.

The Australian government did not listen. Would not listen.

Instead, it was entirely focused on performative politics at the UN and positioning itself at home with its Muslim voter base for the coming election.

Will Trump’s ceasefire deal hold?

Leave a reply

Currently a million dollar question, but with significant opportunities for missteps and a return to war all along the 20 point plan……

At the moment, there is a fair chance that the 20 living hostages will be handed over by Monday to coincide with Trump’s in-and-out flying visit to Israel and its Knesset. Possibly, a few of the murdered hostage bodies may also handed over by the end of that 72 hr deadline at 12 noon Israel time Monday.

And here is where the first of the potential unravelling might start.

For this ceasefire (and putative “peace”) to last, it must satisfy three requirements: a fixed timetable for returning hostages; verifiable steps to demiltarise Gaza (stockpiles, command nodes, and finance channels); and a transitional administration whose personnel are insulated from Hamas’ reach.

Hamas is, and remains, a misogynistic, homophobic, anti-democratic organization, which is antisemitic to its core.

It remains a volent terror organisation. And….it NEVER negotiates from a position of strength.

The corollary is that Hamas was hugely weakened by ongoing Israeli military pressure and faced the threat of a humiliating broader offensive on its Gaza City stronghold. To this, Trump added intense political pressure from a united Arab and Muslim front, specifically Qatar and Turkey.

As Neumi Neumann points out, Hamas is a pragmatic but not moderate movement. It will turn to politics when armed resistance, intimidation and violence cannot advance its vision: to rid the Middle East of the Jewish state.

And, make no mistake, the current absence of war is no accptance of peace by Hamas.

Hamas has agreed to a ceasefire not because it desires peace but because, apart from being essentially wiped militarily by the IDF, they fear now a severe public backlash if they were to reject the deal.

With one eye always on the public messaging it is excellent at, it wants to avoid international blame in the event of failed talks, particularly given the pressure applied by the Trump administration and several Arab and Muslim countries—chiefly Turkey and Qatar, which serve as strategic lifelines for the group.

So, with that bleak introduction and prognosis, let us look at the realistic chances of the ceasefire lasting.

As Andrew Fox says, Hamas’ strategy under the ceasefire can be summed up in two aims: armed survival and continued influence in Gaza. That is to say, Hamas will be politic in publicly agreeing to a ceasefire to ease pressure while later doing (actually already doing) a “yes, but” on issues core to future peace such as disarmament……

Hamas is silent on verifiable demilitarisation because it wants a tactical pause without accepting strategic defeat and will defend its weapons, cadres, tunnels and revenue streams no matter what any 20 point plan the West believes they have made Hamas to sign onto. For Hamas, disarmament is not just a policy detail; it is a matter of existence, not least as clan violence and a post-war civil war are a distinct possibility.

As senior Hamas official Bassem Naeem has already stated , “We will not disarm until an independent and sovereign state capable of defending itself is established.” In other words, Hamas will only hand over their weapons to an army they control; This would be a breach of Point 13 of the 20 point Plan they signed onto which stated “Hamas and other factions agree to not have any role in the governance of Gaza, directly, indirectly, or in any form. There will be a process of demilitarisation…” A clear breach of the spirit and intent of the ceasefire deal they signed but typical of Hamas historically.

Hamas will drag out the return of the bodies as long as possible in order to regroup and kill off all opponents in Gaza who grew in stature over the two years of an unnecessary war. They have alrady said that returning the dead bodies will depend on what they are calling “field conditions”, code for “we will make the Jews wait as long as possible”. Such a move will of course set the stage for probable lengthy delays to maximise ongoing negotiating leverage. And the all important publicity.

Hamas is clearly unhappy with returning all the living and dead hostages in one go and they are constrained by the fact that

a) until that happens, ther will be no full flow of aid into gaza per their demand and

b) IDF will not move from the Yellow Line which encompasses around 53% of Gazan terrirtory; not a victory image for Hamas…..

With Hamas hedging the return of the dead hostages because of “field conditions”, the IDF will remain deployed in over half of Gaza for what could be months. Dissatisfaction with Hamas in Gaza will grow as the promised aid does not materialise. Hamas may try and bluster their way out of that probable impasse by threatening war. And then…..

So. before we even think of Phase 2 compliance, Hamas has already stated that they will not accept ISF oversight in Gaza and will not countenance a foreign ovelord like Tony Blair as a temporary governor; all items per the 20 point plan.

Further, Hamas knows Israel has no intention of leaving the Egypt – Gaza Philadelphi corridor (because Israel said so…) and the cross boder tunnels. Israel has drilled down every 10 metres or so along that border to locate and destroy the wapons and arms smuggling tunnels from Egypt which has solidly supported the Hamas effort against Israel depite having signed a peace treaty with the S state back in March 1979…….

Hamas is also unhappy that access to Egyptian weapons trade via Rafah won’t be happening because Rafah is totally destroyed and the IDF will not be vacating that step off point into Egypt.

Despite unambiguous language in the 20 point plan that Hamas will have no role, in any capacity to govern or influence a post-war gaza, Hamas quite different ideas.

Hamas believes it can by pass this clause by disingenuously claimimg it “renews its approval to hand over the administration of the Gaza Strip to a Palestinian body of independents (technocrats) based on Palestinian national consensus and supported by Arab and Islamic backing.”

So, yes, a pledge to accept a caretaker for municipal duties, but not a promise to exclude Hamas itself from the actual decision-making that shapes security and politics. The statement’s emphasis that the future of Gaza be decided within a comprehensive Palestinian framework indicates the opposite: Hamas intends to remain among those making decisions. And here it is trying to channel the Hezballah model in Lebanon where it leaves the headache of reconstruction and governance to a puppet PA, while it retains armed control of the Strip to grow and threaten Israel again…….

I suppose I could have said the following in the opening paragraphs and saved you time: the chances of the ceasefire succeeding (it’s a pause, not a peace…) are slim.

I would love to be proved wrong but

  1. if Hamas cannot deliver every hostage quickly, that will turn into an early breach, and the entire sequence of prisoner releases and withdrawals that depend on it will come to a halt; with the IDF only redeployed to the Yellow Line….
  2. Hamas’ refusal to discuss the 20 point non-negotiables of demilitarisation and complete non governance will only serve to ratchet up the tensions of a sceptical Israeli public wary of being double-crossed and a Trump threat to not hold Israel back if it all goes pear-shaped.

There will be no peace if the above conditions are not met as Hamas tries the time-honoured traditional Arab tactic of the “hudna” to re-coup and re-group.

There will also be no peace so long as the education sponsored by the UN in the Strip allows the current slogans chanted by Gazan youth claiming “victory” to be a part of the national identity of the Gazan Arabs: “Khaybar, Khaybar ya Yahud, jaish Muhammad sa-ya’ud!” ( Remember “Khaybar, Khaybar, O Jews, {scene of a massacre of jews} Muhammad’s army will return.”).

As such, then, peace and the two state solution remain as dead now as before the West fell over itself to recognise a “Palestinian” “state”.

And we haven’t even begun talking about the Hamas-infested terror triangle of Tulkarem, Jenin and Nablus over in Judea in the East…….

There was Always Going to be a Genocide in Gaza

Leave a reply

In a blog post written on 19 July 2025, Eliezer Finkelman states that the charge of genocide against Israel was a necessary one by Hamas and many in the European Western media, not least the UN, the Red Cross and a variety of NGOS…

For decades, many news organizations framed their coverage of the Middle East with an anti-Israel bias. Having long ago discarded religion, as a rallying point for the west to promote Jew-hate, today’s legacy media instead spreads the totally false messages that Jews kill for “genocide”.

This was the word chosen by Hamas’ supporters and supporters Qatar, Iran and Turkey as well as pro-“Palestinian” legacy media supporters because, per Finkelman, “friends of Hamas needed to charge Israel with crimes sufficiently horrifying to justify Hamas’ own massacring, torturing, raping, and murdering of Jews, accompanied by gleeful video recordings. The friends needed a charge more visceral than “colonialist occupation” and “apartheid.” Even the charge that Israel denied Palestinians full political rights seems too bloodless to justify what Hamas had done. Of all the available charges, the one that fit the need best, inevitably, was “genocide.”

And this fit perfectly into a simmering European antisemitism that lay dormant locked with the shackles of “politically correct” speech.

The thin civilizational veneer that used to stop most of “elite” society from displaying the ugliest parts of its Jew-hatred completely peeled off. It became a full-on display of Jew-hate, now cloaked in the transparent pretense of “anti-Zionism.”

October 7 2023 was the catalyst for that latent hate and provided the burst in the dam that the west arguably waited for.

It provided the excuse for the vilification of Israel, falsely defaming the Jewish state and its inhabitants, and accusing it of genocide, thus eerily embodying echoes of Nazi propaganda strategy: accuse others of that of which you are guilty.

Because, even before Israel had a chance to organise and catch its breath at the bestiality and horror of the Muslim atrocities on the Jews of Israel, western media were already talking about, on October 11 2023, of a “genocide” being committed in Gaza as Israeli planes began pounding known Hamas command centres……

Western media accusing Israel of instigating a “genocide” in Gaza in mid October, eased the conscience of bystanders of the Holocaust where a genocide actually did take place.

Thus, as the extent of the Hamas atrocities were discovered, and as Hezballah and Hamas fired barrages of rockets at civilian centres (as did the Iranians later), and as mobs in so many Western European cities gorged themselves in attacking Jewish houses, synagogues and places of business, then, of course, support of the “resistance by any means necessary” against the “genocidal Israelis was to be encouraged and supported on Israel’s sixth front: the bitter war on the narrative of the Israel-Hamas war.

Of course, there is no “genocide” in Gaza.  There never was.

Image

Fig1. These are not victims of a “genocide”

Per the UN Genocide Convention, 1948, genocide requires the intent to destroy a people, in whole or in part, because of who they are. 

This is NOT happening in Gaza. There is NO state policy, NO military directive, and NO legal finding by any international court including the 17 member International Court of Justice that concluded or implied Israel is committing genocide. 

There IS a war in Gaza between Israel and Sunni Muslim terror entity Hamas. And, as the rest of the world has now been forced to admit, Hamas, by even its own admission, does everything in its power to ensure maximum civilian suffering. 

But, there is no genocide in Gaza.

No other country except Israel would be expected to warn civilians before every airstrike even though it alerts the Hamas terrorists and provides them the military advantage to prepare for the attack by ducking into the tunnels their civilians are not allowed to use.  Even the United States did not pre warn civilians ahead of its initial invasion of Iraq in 2003, which involved major urban battles to include in Baghdad. And it did not do this before its April 2004 Battle of Fallujah….

A country intent on genocide does NOT

  • allow humanitarian aid to its enemy daily
  • air-drop flyers to give civilians instructions on when and how to evacuate including with safe corridors
  • set up safe zones for those evacuated civilians in al Muwasi on the south coast well away from Hamas fire arenas
  •  initiate daily four-hour pauses over multiple consecutive days of the war to allow civilians to leave active combat areas
  • Make real 19,734 phone calls to civilians in combat areas, send 64,399 SMS texts and record almost 6millin pre-recorded calls, in Arabic, to provide civilians with instructions on evacuations or
  • refrains from eliminating the enemy’s leadership in the name of “proportionality”

In fact, when it comes to avoiding civilian harm, there is no modern comparison to Israel’s war against Hamas of any army in history.

The Israeli Defense Force uses many types of Precision Guided Missiles (PGMs) to avoid civilian harm, including the use of munitions like small diameter bombs (SDBs), as well as technologies and tactics that increase the accuracy of non-PGMs. Israel has also employed a tactic when a military has air supremacy called dive bombing, as well as gathering pre-strike intelligence on the presence of civilians from satellite imagery, scans of cell phone presence, and other target observation techniques. All of this is to do more pinpoint targeted to avoid civilian deaths. None of this is consistent with wiping out Gazans in a genocide.

There is no genocide in Gaza as the population there continues to grow even as Israel loses soldiers in ground operations trying to minimise civilian casualties. With a 1.99% annual growth rate, Gaza’s population has risen by 2.84% in the past year (2023-2024) according to the UN.

In the ACTUAL and real genocide of the Jews of Europe in the 1940s, there was no population boom………..

For all that, the tactic of levelling the accusation of “genocide” against Israel was meant to shock, not least because Israel itself was born was born in the aftermath of the carnage that gave the world the word “genocide”.

 In the event, the near-vexatious litigation brought by South Africa failed in its immediate purposes: firstly to stop the destruction of Gaza from the furious Israeli response and to let Israel continue to cope impotently with its nose bloodied by Hamas Muslim atrocities while  tying up Israel’s armed response to get back its hostages through the use of politicised lawfare. So much so that, Ireland, in supporting South Africa’s failed claim to have the ICJ conclude that a genocide was in progress in Gaza, finally understood that Israel could not be found to be committing genocide under 76 years of legal precedent and interpretation of the Convention, and therefore requested that the definition of the crime be altered to prove the case against Israel.   Truly.

It is clear now that there is no genocide in Gaza and that there never was one, actual or intended.  Israel’s actions reflect its desire to spare Palestinian civilians from harm, not to deliberately harm them evidenced in part by creating humanitarian corridors to move them away from the fire zones, as well ensuring that non-Hamas actors such as the international Gaza Humanitarian Fund provide food and aid to Gazan civilians rather than, as happened till now, have Hamas steal that aid to sell back to their captive civilians at usurious prices.

In Gaza, Hamas puts civilians in harm’s way, inflates the death toll, especially of women and children, to fuel its propaganda. This is amplified by a grateful media offering one-sided, emotional imagery that shapes a narrative of Israel as cruel, reckless and…..”genocidal”, while shielding Hamas from all responsibility. For example, WHICH European or African country has consistently demanded that Hamas return the hostages??? This is amplified by a grateful media offering one-sided, emotional imagery that shapes a narrative of Israel as cruel, reckless and…..”genocidal”, while shielding Hamas from all responsibility. For example, WHICH European or African country has consistently demanded that Hamas return the hostages??

From Gaza, it was always going to be a genocide.

But one intended by Hamas.

As then-Hamas spokesman Ghazi Hamad put it: “We must teach Israel a lesson, and we will do it twice and three times. The al Aqsa Deluge (the name Hamas gave its October 7 massacre) is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth. We do not believe in a two-state solution. We will never recognize Israel.”

Proof that Hamas harboured genocidal intent toward Israelis.

Why would you want to “globalise the intifada”?

Leave a reply

Well, “globalising the intifada” is muslim and pro pal code for killing off Jews wherever they may be found.

It is part of that same islamonazi clubby hate-code which substitutes the word “Zionists” for “Jews” thus providing an (incidentally completely disprovable) out against being labelled “antisemitic”.

Anti-Zionism” is always and everywhere antisemitic.

And so, intifada in the Gaza and Judean arab context means violence targeted ONLY at Jews; in, and outside of, Zion.

That is to say, in the context of the Israel-Arab conflict, an “intifada” implies bloody violence and calls for the death and murder of Jews & Israelis – both civilian and military.

Calls to “Globalize the Intifada” are not calls for civil disobedience, general strikes, or negotiations. They are not calls for an “uprising” protesting Jewish indigeneity by singing Kumbaya and songs of solidarity. Referencing the two very violent and bloody intifadas in Judea of 1987 and 2000, they are calls for the murder of Israelis and Jews around the world.

Globalising the intifada would have others make the lives of Jews unsafe the world over.

Globalising the intifada is a call for muslims and their “antizionist-not-antisemitic” leftist supporters to rise up in violence against both Jews and Israel be that through physical violence burning Jews to death per Boulder, Colorado 2025 or shooting them dead per Washington 2025.

It could be through economic hostility per the Republic of Ireland now boycotting anything made in Israel, or Canada’s RCMP hunting and investigating Canadian Jews who have served in the IDF.

It could be Italian busineses in Milano putting up large “Israelis Not Welcome” posters in their shop window displays. And it could be two unknown rappers on stage at Glastonbury, England 2025 who led a crowd of 200,000 attendees in a chant of “Death, death to the the IDF” while the country’s national broadcaster, the BBC, livestreamed it to millions worldwide.

Image

Nuremberg 1935 transposed in colour to Glastonbury 2025.

Globalising the intifada is a call to encourage violence against Israelis, Jews, and institutions supporting Israel.

Globalising the intifada is aimed at widespread violent actions against Jewish homes, cultural centres and individuals taken in the name of “resisting” Israel.

Thus synagogues in Manchester and London are grafitied with swastikas, cars and homes of Jewish community leaders in Sydney, Australia are damaged or destroyed, Jews at soccer matches in Amsterdam, Holland are subject to a muslim “Jew-hunt”, and Jewish businesses in France and Belgium are daubed with red paint on walls and windows replete with antisemitic slogans.

So widespread is the Jew-hate as part of globalising the intifada, and so mainstreamed now, that the putative Democratic shia muslim mayor of New York, home to the largest concentration of Jews outside of Israðel, cannot even bring himself to condemn the slogan.

Dont buy the lie.

Globalize the Intifada is not a call for justice; it is a call for violence.

Against Jews and Israel.

Dont buy the lie.

Muslim arabs and their supporters will tell you with disarming guile that all the word “intifada” means is “uprising.”

You should consider that interpretation in the same context that ISIS commanders and supporters might have explained to you that all “jihad” really means is personal struggle…..

Anybody who supports, or worse, refuses to condemn calls to “globalise the intifada” is a would-be genocidaire bent on exterminating a targeted people.

In actual practice, globalising the intifada is exactly what you think it means: a call for violence against Jews worldwide; a call to restart the mass murder of Jewish innocents around the globe as a continuation of the bloody and violent first and second intifadas against the Jews of Israel.

By any means possible…..

Anti-Zionist is the renewed mantra

Leave a reply

Anti -Zionism is always and everywhere antisemitic.

Anti-Zionism is not connected at all to which flavour of government in Israel rules the day.

Anti-Zionism is NOT criticism of the policies or actions of this or that government of Israel, and it is NOT criticism of specific policies of the pre/post-state Zionist movement.

Anti-Zionism is NOT about individuals who reject Zionism because of their rejection of all forms of nation-states, or about marginal ultra-orthodox Jewish sects such as the Neturei Karta so beloved of the antisemitic Iranian regime, who believe that Judaism prohibits Jewish sovereignty in the biblical land of Israel until the Messiah comes.

No, anti-Zionism attacks the foundational legitimacy of Jewish statehood. As a Jewish majority country.

In other words, anti-Zionism (often unhinged and violent) is opposition to Jews having a country in their ancestral homeland while anti-Zionists use the subterfuge of damning it as an ethnostate, while having no issue with 157 Christian majority countries and 57 Muslim majority countries.

Or the glaring dissonance involved in terming Israel an “apartheid ethnostate” which includes 2.1 million Israeli Druze, Bedouin and Christian and Muslim citizens who practice their cultural and religious beliefs without fear or favour or that Israel is the World Centre of the Muslim Shia offshoot Bahai faith……

Image

And it is THAT singling out of a solitary Jewish majority country on the pretext of “anti-Zionism” that is the core of the fact that anti-Zionism is always and everywhere antisemitic.

Image

After all, Zionism is derived from the word Zion, referring to the historic Land of Israel; Zion, historic homeland of the region’s indigenous Jews.

Image

While most Jews were forcibly removed from the Land of Israel after the Second Exile, Jews remained in Judea AND Jerusalem a millennia before and after the Arab Muslim invasions, occupation and colonisation.

For 2000 yrs, descendants of exiled Jews longed to return to their ancestral homeland (Next year in Jerusalem). And connection to the land always remained at the centre of Jewish practice, with biblical festivals tied to the agricultural seasons in the Land of Israel.

In the late 19th century, Zionism emerged as a political movement to re-establish a Jewish state in Israel, the ancestral and documented homeland of the Jewish People dating back to the Egyptian Merneptah stele circa 1208 BCE……

Today, Zionism refers to support for the continued existence of Israel, in the face of regular calls for its destruction or dissolution.

“Anti-Zionism” on the other hand is just the latest catch cry of ancient shape-shifting antisemitism, today motivated by politics (S.I.N.spain/ireland/norway), religion (self -serving ethnoreligious supremacist ideological interpretations of the koran), or ignorance (the many Cosplay Kefiyyeh Cutees of the tent encampments on university grounds).

And, you probably already guessed this yourself, the vast majority of those who today espouse the
“anti-Zionist-not-antisemitic” mantra, invariably invoke historic antisemitic tropes and blood libels to delegitimise the very existence of Jewish people in their homeland.

Some of those tropes, historic and current, are woven into the tsunami of social media hate (but not antisemitic…) fests and include libels such as Jews control the global
financial system and the media (press, music and movie industry).

Image

Others depict Jews as behind
significant world events, such as COVID-19. And while Jews such as the Rothschilds, George Soros and Mark Zuckerberg, are ‘puppeteers’, controlling world events from behind the scenes others depict Jews as octopuses, choking the world with their tentacles (an image first popularised by the Nazis) or even as venomous snakes to be destroyed

Image
Image

Historically, pre the emergence of political Zionism, blood libels against Jews charged that they used the blood of Christians for rituals and that Jews used the blood of Christian children as an ingredient in ritual bread (matza) at Passover…

Today, the post Zionism anti-Zionists use the blood libel that the Israeli army targets Gazan children and is used as a very successful (and provabably false) delegitimising propaganda strategy no matter that images from Syria, Iraq and the Balkans War are often used in pursuit of that libel.

That, then, brings us to the next phase of delegitimisation of the Jewish state by the anti-Zionists: statements that actions taken by the Israeli government in defense of its citizens are disproportionate to the threats they face while simultaneously supporting Arab Muslim atrocities and violence against Jews through non condemnation and, if French President Macron is to be believed, that that ethnoreligious violence is worthy of creating a Palestinian state which doesnt meet even one of the four generally agreed necessary conditions for statehood.

None of the anti-Zionists suffer any intellectual dissonance either in crying “genocide” while Israel feeds and waters the people they are supposedly eliminating en masse

Nor do they see the irony in shouting “ethnic cleansing” as Israel moves out Gazan non-combatants to safe areas to weed out Hamas terrorists embedded amongst a captive civilian population, but then scream “war crime!!!” when civilians die because Hamas, on tgreat of knee capping them or worse, refuses to let them leave combat zones in order to drive up civilian casualty numbers

And no, anti-Zionists make NO demand on other any other member of the international community like Turkey, Spain or Morocco to lay down their arms in the face of attacks by armed militias and lone-wolf terrorists, while time and again sidelining and, now, attempting to sanction Israel (again…) for ensuring the safety of its civilians.

There are REAMS more to be written, but, the central argument is clear no matter how many variations and what-aboutisms are introduced into any discussion on the topic: anti-Zionism is always and everywhere antisemitic in that anti-Zionism attempts to hog-tie and delegitimise through lawfare, the ability of a sovereign Jewish state to protect itself even when those sovereign borders have been breached by terrorists who publicly promise to commit the same atrocities again and again again.

Image

Hamas spokesman Ghazi Hamad on October 24, 2023, 17 days after the atrocities

Image

Ask any three Israelis today what they think about the Israeli government today, and you will get eleven different opinions, many of them highly critical of their leaders.

But what you will hear most if not all AGREE on is that there is today, more than ever perhaps since 1948, the need for Israel to exist as the home and refuge for the Jewish people.

Not as a home for Jews with trembling knees, but as Jews who take pride in their sovereignty and are absolutely clear-eyed about what they need to do to survive for another 3000 years.

No matter the intense efforts of the slick “anti-Zionist-not-antisemitic” dissemblers.

Or the intense antisemitism.

Marking the Fault Lines in Israel’s ME War on Terror

Leave a reply


The firing of the first shots by Hamas at 6.29am on October 7 2023, triggered not only a bloody kinetic war in which a lot of Gaza was, and continues to be flattened, but also a war of narratives which roiled the West much more so than the Middle East itself.

The Israel-Hamas war split open societal fault lines in the West, polarized relations between countries, embedded itself into domestic divides, and accelerated trends such as the growth of far-right movements and anti-immigrant sentiment.

Even so, governments, historically leery of civil chaos no matter their politics, are shifting closer to Israel’s point of view, even as public opinion, especially the younger generations and shaped by a large Muslim minority across Europe, is shifting in favour of the Palestinian (sic) cause. This is evidenced by the huge public protests across Europe highlighting the split between public opinion and governments.

But those huge public protests are only superficially about the human cost of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, or even about the seeming power imbalance between a violent, messianic group in Gaza wedded to wiping out a neighbouring sovereign state because it is Jewish, and a ME military heavyweight determined to prevent a repeat of the atrocities and massacres perpetrated on it by Hamas in 2023.

Across Europe, in America, and even in the Antipodes in Australia, mass protests sprang up protesting, it seemed initially, Israel’s robust military response to the Hamas terrorists embedded deep inside Gaza’s civilian infrastructure.

Within a couple of months, that changed into something else: blatant antisemitism coupled with a wide ranging cultural war aimed at the very roots of Western traditions.

But not only traditions, even the language of ideas was under attack as words no longer meant what they had until recently meant.

Thus, Israel, with 2.1 million Israeli Arab citizens with equal rights, was an “apartheid regime”; targeting and killing Hamas terrorists purposely embedded amongst nominally innocent civilians was a “genocide” albeit pointedly not framed as such by seventeen judges from the ICJ; Jews in and out of Israel were “racists” even as the mass protestors screamed at Jews to go back to Poland/Russia/Ukraine in open racist taunts; and placards demanding “justice” seemed more to demand merely revenge.

Revenge on Israel through a range of measures including sanctions, cancel culture where Jewish and Israeli authors, as one example, are boycotted and where their books may not be sold or even translated from Hebrew to another language.

This was accompanied by a slow-walking of military parts requirements from various European countries and vitriolic public speeches by Muslims and Islamophiles which seemed to have stunned governments around the world into silence.

Tent cities sprang up across campuses. As Seth Mandel (Commentary, 8 October, 2024) pointed out: “The tent isn’t the point of the tentifada. The point is the violence, the normalization of second-class citizenship for Jews, the loyalty oaths, the street mobs outside Jewish-owned restaurants smashing windows. It’s the evil energy that can’t be re-corked.”

But, while notionally protesting “Gaza”, it was actually Western culture and Israel as its “Western European” “colonising” standard bearer in the region that generated the most vitriolic hate speech and where Western achievements in thought, art, philosophy and culture were under sustained attack as an embarrassment and the product of “dead white males”.

This irony has not been lost on either Diaspora Jews who were expelled to the Diaspora because they were not white and on Israelis where the population census figures show that 45% of Israelis are Mizrahim, 15% are Russian immigrants, 20% are Arab Israelis, 2.2% are Ethiopian, and 25-30% are Ashkenazi Jews and others. Meaning that 55-60% of the Israeli population is ‘non- white’……

Thus, in America, as in Europe, the Israel-Hamas war led to a selective moralism where international NGOs from Amnesty to MSF refused to hold Islamist terror entities in Gaza to account for a plethora of documented war crimes and crimes against humanity and where that moral blindness, growing unchecked, allowed despotic and corrupt regimes like South Africa to bring charges of genocide against a democratic sovereign state and where the chief prosecutor at the ICC indicted the PM and MoD of a country fighting for its existence on seven fronts against declared terror entities, for “crimes against humanity”.

Further, together with the tidal wave of mainly Muslim migrants from Syria to Europe in 2015-16, the Israel-Hamas war has thrown into sharp relief the fault lines across Europe of resentment not only against Hamas for its atrocities, but also against Arabs and Muslims in general. The emotions triggered by the Hamas atrocities in Israel and its massacre of Israeli civilians no doubt ended up conflating terrorists, illegal migrants, and asylum-seekers in the minds of Europeans who generally have no detailed knowledge of the politics of the Middle East.

For better or for worse, this has fed into Europe’s voting demographic and may well explain the political gains of more right wing parties based as they are on both the fears this mass immigration has created among their followers as well as the concerted academic push to re-locate loci of power in Western society through things like Critical Race Theory and aggressive activism.

Closer to home, Israel’s war on terror in both Gaza and Lebanon have led to an accentuating of local fault lines.

Egyptian officials have been worried about the possibility that Palestinians in the coastal strip would stream into the Sinai Peninsula through the Rafah crossing on the Egyptian border.

While they may publicly profess that this would mean the death blow to a cherished “Palestinian State”, such “endangered” “statehood” did not seem to be part of their calculus when they illegally occupied the Strip between 1948 and 1967 with never a single peep made about the Palestinian statehood.

The real reason why Egypt feels the fault line should not widen is altogether less altruistic: Egyptian President Abdelfattah al-Sisi has been has been battling jihadist cells in the Sinai. He has outlawed the Muslim Brotherhood, a designated terrorist organisation in Egypt, of which Hamas is the Gazan branch. His concern is that should a significant number of Gazans infiltrate the Sinai, and Palestinian jihadist groups establish logistical, ideological and operational links and bases there, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to separate Palestinian militants from the mass of new refugees. These militants could very well try to launch attacks on Israeli targets from Egyptian territory, inviting retaliation from Israel and unsettling its relations with Egypt.

For its part, Jordan fears that Israel plans to force West Bank Palestinians into the kingdom. Jordanians have taken to the streets across the country to protest on a daily basis and the government’s major concern is that this feared mass displacement into Jordan would be economically ruinous, where the new demographic reality of Jordan becoming the de facto Palestinian state would almost certainly destabilise the political order, which has historically privileged Jordanians of non-Palestinian origin.

And finally, in this brief overview of how Israel’s war on terror is exacerbating fault lines old and new, we have the renewal of the civil war in Syria.

With the fall of Haleb (Aleppo) to Turkey-backed Syrian groups and al Qaeda linked groups like Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, Turkey’s influence in the region has risen greatly while complicating prospects for reconciliation between Erdogan and Assad.

For Israel, Iran’s wish to rush arms to Syria which no longer has Hezballah to fight alongside it, will be met (IS being met) with a clear deterrence by Israel which will not allow an arms build-up so close to its border, arms which may be used against it when/if Assad falls.

It remains to be seen if Turkey’s Sunni Muslim Brotherhood affiliated militia(s) or Iran’s Shia IRGC and local Shia militias will win out in the end and what will be its implications for Iraq, Lebanon and Syria and for a weakened Iran itself.

In Gaza, Yahya Sinwar dreamed of, and planned for, a huge Middle East conflagration and chaos.

It’s happening. Just not in quite the way he envisaged.

Missed Turn-offs on a Road to Nowhere

Leave a reply

In July 2000, former U.S. president Bill Clinton brought then Palestinian Liberation Organization chairman Yasser Arafat and then Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak to Camp David in search of a conflict-ending accord.

Twenty two years earlier, Jimmy Carter had done a similar thing between former Egyptian president Anwar Sadat and then Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin—a process which led to a historic peace deal between tgevtwo countries.

Why then, did the July 2000 negotiations between Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat fail to result in an agreement?

In the final analysis, Arafat turned out to be a paranoid  anti-semite.

The Guardian, a newspaper noted for its virulent anti-Israel stance puts it like this: “Arafat was persuaded that the Israelis were setting a trap. His primary objective thus became to cut his losses rather than maximise his gains.“

Bill Clinton, hosting the negotiations, put it like this: “…[we] put on the table a proposal, based on UN Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, very close to the Palestinian demands, and Arafat refused even to accept it as a basis for negotiations, walked out of the room, and deliberately turned to terrorism.”

How’s that for paranoia?

But here is a little more detail of the “trap” that never was and what was offered:

  1. establishment of a demilitarised Palestinian state on some 92% of the West Bank and 100% of the Gaza Strip
  2. territorial compensation for the Palestinians from pre-1967 Israeli territory
  3. dismantling of most of the settlements
  4. establishment of the Palestinian capital in east Jerusalem, in which some Arab neighborhoods would become SOVEREIGN [emphasis mine because the term denoted STATE-HOOD for the palestinians…] Palestinian territory
  5. Palestinian SOVEREIGNTY over half the Old City of Jerusalem (the Muslim and Christian quarters)
  6. “custodianship,” though not sovereignty, over the Temple Mount
  7. return of refugees to the prospective Palestinian state though with no “right of return” to Israel proper
  8. organisation by the international community of a massive aid programme to facilitate the refugees’ rehabilitation.

Yasser Arafat, father of the “Palestinian nation” (sic), was too heavily invested in violence and image.

He walked out of the negotiations  refusing EVERY SINGLE OFFER on the table before him.

And then, to show the Israelis what they could do with their  offer of what his oaranoid psyche considered entrapment , he initiated the 2nd intifada which left 960 jews dead and 1300 wounded, many critically.

As Barak himself later put it,  “…after I took office I promised Arafat, ‘No new settlements’, but I also told him that we would continue to honour the previous government’s commitments….[I also pointed out that] What was now being built would either remain within territory that you, the Palestinians, agree should remain ours – and therefore it shouldn’t matter to you – or would be in territory that would soon come under Palestinian sovereignty, and therefore add to the housing available for returning refugees. So you can’t lose.”

Twenty four years later, as the PLO/PA messaging became ever more extreme, and as western governments failed to isolate anti Jew extremism in their streets and neighbourhoods, the provable PA lies of alleged genocide, apartheid, starvation, and famine instigated by Israel are now being echoed by Israel-haters worldwide, who adopt, embrace, and disseminate them so the public will deny ANY Palestinian accountability or agency.

For most of the screaming mob in the west who riot to destroy civic order, nobody cares about the Palestinians. They just hate Jews.

And so it is now that as Israel fights a physical battle for its right to exist on seven fronts, its greatest threat, per Gol Kalev in his new book, The Assault on Judaism (Post Hill Press) is the astonishing ideological attack from the West that followed October 7th, and the extent to which it presents an even greater danger to the survival of Judaism in Western democracies.

For example, Justin Trudeau of Canada danced at a concert as Montreal was burned by rioting Jew haters, 1 in 5 French youths believe it would be good if Jews were kicked out of Europe, Britain’s Starmer says he will arrest Israeli PM Netanyahu and ex Israeli MoD Gallant as war criminals if they visit Britain and Norway has refused to supply Israel certain parts needed to fight its 7 front war against a radical messianic Muslim coalition publicly sworn to eradicating the Jewish state.

Had Arafat showed any courage whatsoever, there would not have been any Israel versus Hamas-Hezballah- Iran-Iraq-Syria-Houthi-West Bank war.

But he didnt, and his successor Mahmoud Abbas did exactly the same thing again in 2008 despite a near identical Israeli offer by Israeli PM Olmert but this time with 110% of Gaza thrown in for good measure……..

The Arabs who now want you to call them “Palestinians” were never really interested in peace, unlike Jordan and Egypt, with their sovereign Jewish neighbour.

The 2000 Barak-Arafat deal fell through because Arafat was no nationalist. What he was was a foremost proponent of a “Palestinian” “nationalism” that was focused on the erasure of Jewish history and presence in the Southern Levant, rather than any nation building.

The 2000 Barak-Arafat deal fell through because Arafat used (a hitherto non-existent) “Palestinian” identity together with the lie of Israel’s “illegality”,   as a shallow political veneer that was envisaged and TYdeveloped as a zero-sum response to responsible, state-building Zionism, and where it serves 20 years later in 2024 as a hostile tool kept sharpened for use against Israel.

Thus, Arafat’s legacy, after his astonishing refusal to make peace, is the widespread death and destruction of the Gazans he, as an Egyptian, didnt really care about.

After all, Israel’s modern-day birthright emanated from the Balfour Declaration, the San Remo Conference, the League of Nations, and the United Nations. How many nations on earth, including a number of Israel’s neighbors, can claim so many layers of legitimacy?

And besides, Arafat never worked out that hating Jews is not a sufficient condition to allow one to be granted statehood.

Thus, Arafat’s legacy, after his astonishing refusal to make peace, and his consistency in consistently making the wrong decisions (Black September, Tunisia, Lebanon…) is the widespread death and destruction of the Gazans he, as an Egyptian, didnt, in the final analysis, really care about.