Trace graphs, not trace matrices.
Every requirement, piece of evidence, test and signature is a linked record, not a row in a spreadsheet.
One platform for every requirement and document check. Agents for every workflow, working 24/7.
Deployed inside a Global Top-10 pharmaceutical manufacturer. Signed by their QA.
| Requirement | Clause | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Operating range −20 to +55 °C | §3.2.1 | TR-118 §4.2 |
| Data retained for 10 years | §6.1.3 | FS §2.1 |
| Audit trail export to PDF/A | §6.1.7 | — |
Quality assurance should prevent mistakes before they happen. Today it still means people reading thousands of pages by hand, like checking three supplier offers against one specification.
| URS clause | Requirement | Supplier A | Supplier B | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.2.1 | Operating range | Comply | Comply | see TR? |
| 2 | 4.2.7 | Reject verification | Comply | ?? | ask vendor |
| 3 | 6.1.3 | Data retention 10y | Comply | Partial | 7y in FS? |
| 4 | 6.1.7 | Audit trail PDF/A | #REF! | Comply | |
| 5 | 7.2.4 | Part 11 e-signature | Comply | Comply | check OQ |
| 6 | 8.4.1 | Changeover < 15 min | Deviation | pending | |
| 7 | 9.1.2 | Noise < 70 dB(A) | Comply | who checks? |
Records shall be retained for 7 10 years and be retrievable…
| Criterion | A | B | C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput | 300/min | 280/min | ? |
| Retention | 10 y | 7 y | #N/A |
| Changeover | 18 min | 12 min | 14 min |
| Price | €1.2M | €0.98M | €1.1M |
Hundreds of requirements checked against dozens of documents, line by line, by hand.
Only a few people can judge a spec against evidence. They are the bottleneck on every deadline.
What counts as met, partial or missing lives in people’s heads. It leaves when they do.
A failed audit, a rejected batch or a lost tender costs far more than finding the gap.

Quality is the 1% that makes or breaks a company. Until now, only the biggest could afford to get it right.
Every product that reaches a patient, a plane or a power grid stands on quality assurance. It is the standard customers trust and auditors test. When it slips, one missed line can sink a launch, a batch or a brand.
Doing QA properly takes rare people: auditors, validation engineers and subject-matter experts for every standard, applied to every document, every time. No team can hire enough of them.
So we built Qualitum: an AI Chief Quality Officer with a swarm of agents that learn your company’s knowledge and do the expert work, with proof behind every answer.
ChatGPT gives you a best guess. Qualitum gives you audit-ready proof.
87% of buying decisions made with frontier AI models still get re-checked by a person. In B2B it is every decision, by hand. When an answer has even a 1% chance of being wrong, the consequences are brutal. And someone has to sign for it.
Qualitum reads every document and puts them in one structured comparison. Every cell traced to its source page. One place for all the work.
| Requirement | URS rev. 4 | Supplier A | Supplier B | Supplier C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2.1 Operating range | −20…+55 °C | MetTR-118 §4.2 | MetSpec p.12 | Partial+45 °C only |
| 4.2.7 Reject verification | Every pack | MetFS-M04 §3.1 | Metp.22 | Metp.9 |
| 6.1.3 Data retention | 10 years | MetFS §2.4 | Conflict7 years, p.31 | Metp.14 |
| 6.1.7 Audit trail PDF/A | Required | MetOQ-23 | Metp.33 | GapNo evidence |
| 8.4.1 Changeover | < 15 min | Partial18 min, p.40 | Metp.45 | Metp.21 |
| Score | 312 req. | 291 met | 274 met | 184 met |
Before anything is compared, every document is normalised to the same requirement, the same unit and the same language. Only then is it scored.
URS-014 rev. 4 received from Engineering.
Reading 4 linked documents… no action from you.
OQ-11 drafted, traced to 9 requirements.
Ready for your signature. 1 conflict flagged for review.
Splits any spec into testable, risk-tagged requirements.
Meet the agentLinks every requirement to the page that proves it.
Meet the agentFinds missing, partial and conflicting evidence before the auditor does.
Meet the agentWrites IQ/OQ/PQ, FAT/SAT and test specs in your templates.
Meet the agentRe-checks every draft against its source with multi-model consensus.
Meet the agentKeeps a live trace graph and flags everything a change touches.
Meet the agentClassifies systems under GAMP 5, with the rationale.
Meet the agentScores every offer against your URS, apples to apples.
Meet the agentAnswers or checks tenders, clause by clause.
Meet the agentMaps standard clauses to the evidence you already hold.
Meet the agentShows the impact of every change before you approve it.
Join the design partner listKeeps you inspection-ready, any day of the year.
Join the design partner list
The full seven-step engine is on the Consensus OS page. Here is the short version.
Your requirements, SOPs, templates, past projects and the current regulations become one knowledge graph. Nothing is answered from the open internet.
requirements.graphURS, specs, tenders, split into testable itemsevidence.graphTest reports, certificates, drawings, offerssops-templates.graphYour SOPs, templates and numberingregulations.graphCurrent regulations and guidance, versioneddecisions-log.graphPast decisions, deviations and sign-offsEach agent does one job. Together they compare every document against every requirement and show you the result side by side.
| Requirement | Supplier A | Supplier B | Supplier C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2.1Operating range | MetTR-118 §4.2 | MetSpec p.12 | Partial+45 °C only |
| 6.1.3Data retention | MetFS §2.4 | Conflict7 years, p.31 | Metp.14 |
| 6.1.7Audit trail PDF/A | MetOQ-23 | Metp.33 | GapNo evidence |
| 8.4.1Changeover | Partial18 min, p.40 | Metp.45 | Metp.21 |
| Met of 312 | 291 | 274 | 184 |
Nothing regulated moves without a person. Every draft, check, edit and signature is recorded, attributable and exportable for the auditor.
“We’ve cut more than 50% of the time out of our validation process, and the cost saving has been enormous. The evidence package is what makes it real: a system we can hand to an auditor and defend.”

Measured inside a Global Top-10 pharmaceutical manufacturer.
Your experts stay. The reading, cross-checking and first drafts move to agents.
| Without Qualitum | With Qualitum | |
|---|---|---|
| Protocols | Validation engineers write every IQ/OQ/PQ by hand.[€X] per protocol | The Drafting Agent writes them in your templates. Engineers review and sign.70% less authoring |
| Compliance matrices | Consultants build them in Excel, project by project.[€X] per project | The Evidence Agent links every row to the page that proves it. |
| Cross-reading | Reviewers read five documents to check one requirement. | One review pass, with the matching passage in each document highlighted. |
| Supplier offers | Compared in Excel over weeks, each offer in its own format.[€X] per tender | The Supplier Comparison Agent scores every offer against your URS, apples to apples. |
| Audit prep | Weeks assembling evidence packs before every audit.[€X] per audit | An audit-ready record you can export on any day. |
| Coverage | 100% is not possible by hand. Teams sample. | Every requirement, every document, every cycle. |
| Availability | Office hours. 24/7 is not possible. | Agents work 24/7. People sign when they are ready. |
Your AI CQO works for both. Same evidence chain, from both ends.
We started where the regulator is strictest. The same agents read the requirements and evidence of every regulated industry.
Reference deploymentCSV and equipment qualification, URS to PQ. Live inside a Global Top-10 pharma.
Design inputs traced to verification. Technical files from your evidence.
Every certification requirement traced to a verified test.
Aircraft records checked for pre-buy and sale readiness.
Vendor tenders and network acceptance, clause by clause.
Tender compliance, CE/EN conformity and handover files.
FAT/SAT, IQ/OQ packs and conformity files from your data.
Requirements on one side, evidence on the other? Your AI CQO can check it.
Tell us about your projectLearned inside pharma validation, where a missing signature is a finding and a drifting matrix is a warning letter.
Every requirement, piece of evidence, test and signature is a linked record, not a row in a spreadsheet.
Agents never decide or approve. A qualified person on your side reviews and signs every regulated output.
Single-tenant, deployed inside your environment. Any LLM. EU, US or UAE residency. Air-gap capable.
Every requirement and every record is checked, every cycle, not the 1–5% a human team has time for.
Send one requirement document and one piece of evidence. The same agents that run inside a Global Top-10 pharmaceutical manufacturer find every gap and tell you what it would mean at audit. You get the report in 48 hours.
A team of AI agents that does the reading, comparing, gap-finding and drafting work of a quality department, 24/7. Every answer is traced to the page that proves it. Your AI CQO prepares. Your qualified person signs.
No. Agents prepare and check. A qualified person on your side reviews, approves and signs every regulated output with an attributable e-signature. The Verifier Agent re-checks drafts before a person sees them, but the decision is always human.
A general chatbot gives you an answer. Qualitum checks every requirement one by one, against every document, and links each result to the page and clause that proves it. If there is no proof, it is a gap. Several models must agree before a result is shown.
Nowhere outside your perimeter. Qualitum runs single-tenant inside your cloud or on-prem, with EU, US or UAE residency and air-gap capability. You choose the model. We have no training rights and keep no data.
Any industry where requirements must be proven with evidence: life sciences, medical devices, aerospace, aviation, telecom, construction and industrial machinery. Our reference deployment is inside a Global Top-10 pharmaceutical manufacturer; the results we quote come from there.
Two documents for the free gap report. For a pilot: one project, one requirement set and its evidence, and one qualified reviewer. First agent in production in 8 to 12 weeks.