pro AI arguments always sound trivial because they're trying to find general, relatable examples.
but most tasks requiring intelligence are not general or relatable - those tasks are already covered by common knowledge or popular tools.
the best pro AI argument is a question:
I’m a competent adult. Why do I need an “AI agent” to check into a flight for me?
I’m literate. Why do I need an “AI agent” to read and write emails for me? Also, I don’t get so many emails that I can’t answer them myself.
The reason “no one uses AI” is that there’s no
Quote
This is my thesis: no one uses AI. I repeat, absolutely no one. We live in a bubble.
Even among my friends who pay for it, when I ask them to open ChatGPT and show me their queries, it’s the same handful of basic things.
Most don’t even know they can upload a photo and ask





