Oh dear, this was a sad year for reading. I only read 31 books. I think I might have forgotten to list some, but the truth is that my reading was sorely limited this year, partly because of teaching full time in the spring, partly because of moving, partly because my attention and will are weak, and I watched more movies and scrolled through more media. Should I give myself grace for having weakened in my consumption of good literature? Or should I be honest about my failing and charge myself with the task of applying more self-discipline next year?
Granted, I dedicated a lot of time to teaching, grading, and planning. Much of my reading was for school, either researching for class, or prepping to teach. My list includes rereads like The Outsiders and The Diary of Anne Frank and Night, which I will miss reading. They deserve regular rereading.
In addition to the books on rhetoric and public speaking on my list, I also did quite a bit of reading online about teaching these subjects. I spent a lot of time on the American Rhetoric website reading classic speeches, as well as googling around for other good examples of the use and abuse of rhetoric. I read a bit about logic and fallacies. (But I also spent much too much time on Facebook marketplace reading ads - an interesting study in rhetoric in itself. In the language of the amateur marketer.)
Now that we don't have such a comfortable place for watching tv (our new couch in the basement is not nearly as cushy), I suspect our tv watching will decrease. And I no longer need to scroll Zillow as I did much of the spring nor Facebook marketplace as I did much of the summer and fall nor shop for presents as I did much of December. So I will have more time to read!
What were the highlights of my reading year?
I am glad I finished The Hunchback of Notre Dame, although I did not enjoy it very much. It was long and wordy, although I appreciated some of the descriptive parts and wish I had read it before our trip to Paris this summer. The characters were flat and static. Very little, if any character development - except to descend further into darkness, as Claude Frollo and his brother Jehan and the soldier Phoebus did. Esmeralda seemed to grow more stupid in her love for Phoebus. Gringoire became more of a caricature. And Esmeralda's mother seemed more insane that wracked by grief. No one seemed to have any interior life or sense of faith. Although the hunchback was the most sympathetic character, and he seemed to have the most virtue of any of the characters, Hugo made his virtue seemed almost more unintentional, like a blind loyalty or innate passion. But I'm glad I stuck with it as a piece of literary history, and I feel some sense of accomplishment for finishing this classic, even though I found all of the characters disappointing, and none seem to be redeemed by the end of the novel. Hugo's outlook seems to be similar to Thomas Hobbes' "life is nasty, brutish, and short." While the book was billed as an encomium to the Cathedral de Notre Dame, it made the cathedral seem a dark and foreboding place that hid misdeeds by the misguided and eventually corrupt/evil curate Frollo and a prison more than a place of refuge for Esmeralda and the hunchback.
One book I enjoyed that was new to me was Giants in the Earth by Ole Rolvaag. This also was a book club pick, and I liked this one better than some of my fellow readers, although I did feel exasperated with the blindness of some of the characters. I always enjoy a story about the hard lives of pioneers on the prairie, though, and this one seemed to be a very true to life account of the harsh aspects of that time and place. I reread Persuasion for this book club also- can't go wrong with Jane Austen! My brother, who is into online auctions now, bid on a set of 3 Jane Austen editions from the late 1800s- the ended up selling for around $700, so he didn't win the auction, but it shows the love her books deserve.
My reading of young adult books has also trailed off, although my reading for class the first half of the year, which seems a lifetime ago now, was primarily middle grade fiction. I miss reading aloud with my daughter, a habit we dropped when we moved. She was tiring of listening to Anne Shirley novels, but I would be happy to pick them up again. Perhaps another resolution! I'm sure she'd love if we returned to that habit. We didn't keep the comfy folding papasan chair that I used to sit in to read, but now she has her sister's full bed, so there's plenty of room to cuddle up on a cold winter's eve. I just need to prioritize the practice. I did finish listening to The Hobbit in the car with her, as she was reading it for her 6th grade class, and I always enjoy the dramatized version, which we found on Internet Archive.
Although my spiritual reading was primarily reflection pieces - I spent a lot of time finding prayers for the season for my class - I did do some reading related to our travels. I read Christy Wilkin's book about Lourdes, but perhaps my favorite spiritual reading was Plough magazine. I included these issues as books because I read each issue, 4 per year, cover to cover. The essays range from historical to theological to cultural and issues include art and poetry and a biography of a holy person. Although published by the Bruderhof, many of the writers are Catholics. The Winter theme was Beauty and Work was the theme for the fall. It's the one print periodical I'm still subscribing to right now.
I skimmed through a number of books on rhetoric before starting teaching this fall, and I did actually enjoy my close read of Aristotle's Art of Rhetoric. It is concerned as much with the nature of being human and being moved by emotions, motivated by virtue, and attracted to beauty, as with "rules" rhetoric and logic. Although some sections get bogged down in lists and definitions, it includes a number of observations about human nature that provide for good class discussions, such as what is happiness and what things inspire it? And what are the characteristics of a good life which are worthy of being deliberated? Justice and the characteristics of a government ruled by law are also topics of interest. A lot packed into a short book, and a reminder of how public speaking and writing form the character of our nation. Although much public discourse is colored by incivility and ad hominem attacks and other fallacies of logic, learning about rhetoric perhaps can resolve some of that divisiveness as ideas are shared and thoughtfully debated. One of the first books I finished for 2026 is John Duffy's Provocations of Virtue, which considers the rhetoric classroom as a learning lab for practicing ethics through discussion, debate, and learning to communicate ethically. It gave me a lot to think about at the opening of the semester.
Now it's time for me to get back to planning for this semester. The recognition that my reading was severely diminished this year is a wake up call to dedicate myself more to intellectual discipline - turning off the phone and picking up the book. Of course, the goal isn't a number, but a growth in knowledge, understanding, curiosity, empathy, commitment, imagination, faith, motivation, etc. May the books I read be more than just a competition to best myself. Here's to turning more pages, but also turning over more ideas, in 2026!



