I've been wondering about visual c++.. I know it exists, but unfortunatley I know nothing about it, so I have a question.. what is the relation of c++ to visual c++? which one of the following is more correct? (: stands for "is to" and :: stands for "as")

1) cpp : visualcpp :: cpp : c
2) cpp : visualcpp :: cpp : any class
3) cpp : visualcpp :: cpp : variables or functions
4) cpp : visualcpp :: cpp : java
5) cpp : visualcpp :: cpp : cpp

Thanks in advance.