This movie was recently on TCM’s Noir Alley, and I’m surprised I haven’t reviewed it before this. I’ve seen it before, but it had been a few years, so watching it again was almost like watching it for the first time.
The movie starts off looking a little bit like His Girl Friday or The Front Page. Barbara Stanwyck plays a busy and smart newspaper reporter. I half expected Cary Grant to show up and for the two of them to start cracking wise at any moment. Or maybe Fred MacMurray. That would’ve been interesting.
But the movie is not a screwball comedy, of course. It’s about a woman who places her husband’s job and home life above herself and her own needs. And it is expected of her. She ditches her career as a reporter, marries a police detective (played tres empathetically by Sterling Hayden, who gets a rare chance to play a basically decent guy), then proceeds to devote herself entirely to making sure he advances up the career ladder. She also has to hang out with a bunch of wives, who are all playing the same game.
The men, meanwhile, play cards. And drink whatever they drink, and Barbara is there, as hostess with the mostest, to make sure their needs are catered to. She kind of slips back-and-forth between the gaggle of gals gossiping and the mob of men, doing manly men stuff.
This division between male and female is underscored by the scenes in which the various players get together, socially. We see Barbara Stanwyck, lurking at the edges of the female gaggle, all burbling enthusiastically to the police captain’s wife about her husband. Along with a truly boringtiresome talk so small it nearly disappears into a low buzz of BS. And, boy, does it show in Barbara Stanwyck’s expression. Not to mention the cinematography, which visually captures the relentlessness of the conversational mediocrity. Babs is most definitely displeased with developments on the home front.
I thought, “My gosh. What year was this movie made?” 1957. At that point, I had to check something out. This movie is about a phenomenon that someone named Betty Friedan wrote a book about. The Feminine Mystique. I remember the name, the book, and the message. The book first came out on February 19, 1963. But the research for the book started in—yes—1957.
I don’t think the Wikipedia editors will mind if I quote from their entry on this book:
In 1957, Friedan was asked to conduct a survey of her former Smith College classmates for their 15th anniversary reunion; the results, in which she found that many of them were unhappy with their lives as housewives, prompted her to begin research for The Feminine Mystique, conducting interviews with other suburban housewives, as well as researching psychology, media, and advertising. The book faced criticism for focusing primarily on the experiences of white, middle-class women and overlooking the perspectives of women of color and working-class women. Friedan originally intended to create an article on the topic, not a book, but no magazine would publish the work. [Ahem!]
Friedan coined the phrase “feminine mystique” to describe the assumptions that women would be fulfilled from their housework, marriage, sexual lives, and children. The prevailing belief was that women who were truly feminine should not want to work, get an education, or have political opinions. Friedan wanted to prove that women were unsatisfied and could not voice their feelings.
I have a vague recollection of this phenomenon being referred to as “the problem with no name.” Which I assume is why she coined the phrase. Frankly, I find the use of the word “mystique” a bit misleading, as if women have some special, mystical quality. We don’t. We’re actually human beings.
But let’s get back to the movie. Okay, so Barbara Stanwyck is living a lie and scheming to advance her husband’s career. She arranges a little accident, so she can meet the captain’s wife and endear herself to the couple. Meanwhile, the captain (played by the real Perry Mason Raymond Burr) (Sorry. For a moment, I thought it was 1963 again.) has his eye on her. The captain is wise to Barbara’s ways. He knows and takes advantage.
Things, of course, do not end well. For much of anyone.
I think this movie’s been remade a few times, with different protagonists, different storylines, and higher technology.
I wonder if the story will ever change.
*****
Directed by Gerd Oswald Screenplay by Jo Eisinger Produced by Herman Cohen
PS: When Eddie Muller said this could be considered a “proto-feminist film,” he wasn’t kidding around.
This isn’t a movie trailer, but it seems to capture the thememood tone of the film.
Am I a New York Times bestselling author if I haven’t made the list since 2011? As in, not even close?
Apparently, the answer is yes. For all the good it does.
Or am I an emerging filmmaker? A screenwriter? A podcaster? A producer?
Sorry this intro is taking so long to read. It’s taking me effort to write it.
So, anyway, I have a short for you today.
Even though I’m a crime writer (primarily), health and wellness are big issues for me.
So, here’s what might pass for a PSA in the days of old. Malaria? Yeah, right. But, back then, you couldn’t say “syphilis” or “gonorrhea” in a cartoon.
And, as long as we’re on the subject of health, I’ll give you a preview of the video I did for my personal YouTube channel next week, because I’m trying to batch things more, etc.
It’s been an interesting year, to say the least. But I wanted to share a bit of my journey in the occasional short video I made now and then, and put up on Instagram.
I strung them together and made a kind of video diary. Only with ever-so-slightly higher production values. The cheapest money can buy. 🙂
My only regret is that I missed my chance at making a Philo Vance joke. But that guy was … not exactly Philip Marlowe, was he? 🙂 And neither is Ellery Queen, for that matter.
Hi, today I’m reviewing the movie Paper Flowers, an indie film from 2024, a very moving film about a young man who, he aspires to work as a Peace Corps worker, helping people in, I can’t remember which country it was, but far away. Was it Peru? Far away from where he normally is.
And his family, it’s interesting, it’s based on a true story, and apparently this was a widely circulated story that I hadn’t been aware of. And that doesn’t surprise me in a sense. I’m not aware of everything that goes on, but it was a very beautiful movie. And it’s based on this guy’s story.
He aspires to be with the Peace Corps. He does these things, various things. His fiancée is someone with a different ethnic background than he, and his family objects to that. And so there are some interesting familial issues not only connected with his decision to join the Peace Corps, but also to be engaged to this woman who is not of the same ethnic background.
But I will not tell you everything about the movie. I will just say that it has a sad, but really uplifting ending. Two thumbs up and five stars. It was a beautiful movie. It was great. And really a good movie for the holidays. Something to think about for the new year. All right, take it easy and I’ll talk to you later. Be seeing you.
*****
Directed by Mahesh Pailoor Screenplay by Mary Krell-Oishi, Mahesh Pailoor, and Asit Vyas Produced by Asit Vyas
And here’s the trailer.
PS: Here’s something else I hope you’ll enjoy. My latest Crime Cafe podcast episode! 🙂
Again, one can never have enough Philip Marlowe fitting for the season. 🙂
Ellery Queen was the pseudonym of the team of Frederic Dannay and Manfred B. Lee, who had been writing under the name since 1929. Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine (EQMM) “was created to provide a market for mystery fiction above the common run of pulp crime magazines of the day.”
Ellery Queen was depicted in radio and television shows, as well.