Top.Mail.Ru
Addicted to Compromise
? ?
Addicted to Compromise [entries|friends|calendar]
Image
Gabriel Koulikov

[ website | Gabe's Internet Hub ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

Will I ever find a community that will accept me as I am? [18 Dec 2024|12:08pm]

This is a follow up blog to my past blogs about my purportedly Christian friends posts and such.


To recap what y'all missed during my absence:


I began to memorize the Bible in Hebrew until Mormon missionaries (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints) convinced me that Joseph Smith is a true prophet and the Book of Mormon is a true revelation in 2019. I knew the Church was corrupt, and asked a friend of mine why I should join a corrupt church. He said that the house may be falling apart, but the foundation is solid. (in this metaphor the building is the Church, the foundation is the prophet Joseph Smith and his revelations, and the Bedrock is Christ)


So I did. Only I didn't, because they couldn't address my electronic privacy concerns. So I was in limbo of being joined enough to receive a calling, yet not enough to get a temple recommend.


In 2023 I moved to Spanish Fork, Utah (first time living out of state from California, where I was born and raised), and I figured: I'll finally talk to the people at the Church in charge of such stuff, yet, they the privacy officer/office that existed at the time I joined had since been disbanded. My concerns were no longer possible to address.


Read more...Collapse )
post comment

LJ goes Yahoo!/Geocities with this most recent "purge." [15 May 2013|01:39am]
I just found out that I need to post, or LJ will delete my journal for 'being inactive for more than 2 years.' There are so many memories they're deleting in this most recent attempted PURGE. (Their words!) I recently injured my wrists, but I'll try to see if there's something I can't do about this. SPREAD THE WORD, as there seems to be no substantial outcry this time!
post comment

30 January 2000, 10 years ago today (yesterday!) [31 Jan 2010|12:18am]
Today's a very exciting 10th anniversary for me!

10 years in the makingCollapse )

More creative/analytical key points and contrast via video soon. Hope you liked hearing the most relevant portions of my life story!

And let me know what you think, thoughtfully if you please.
post comment

To: my purportedly "Christian friends" [12 Apr 2009|07:29pm]
You're not going to win me over with happiness
when what I need is eternal life,
or social visits
when what I need is a Spirit-to-spirit,
heart-to-heart
beat.
beat.
What? Have you nothing else to say?

Say say talk
talk talk to God
they say
say say,
but not to me.
Say hey?
Sometimes,
but more often than not
not
so much
omitted
forget it?
How can I?
What for war
wonder well
when I'll surely be in hell,
since we none know neither
when/how/where
we leave this dwell-
ing to be far gone.

Too far gone to make a difference.

Am I?
I think not.
Do you?

...still nothing to say?
Or may...
...be?

Fine,
be that way.
Or change.
Spare change will do,
but love makes more cents
and dollars and millions
and better, since that treasure is secure,
but how can there be security in silence
when there is yet so much to be spoken?

Take my token
piece of advice,
if it is even that.
But don't add to my vice
ad[d]vice
that serves less than
heart-mind-soul-strength
love
not full strength.
Or willingness is okay,
if that's all you have to spare
change
me
you
commitment
=love
from God's perspective,
not feelings.

Like sympathy.
Spare small sympathies,
as pathetic as they sym,
like pathology
symptomatic
of the path
to empathy
empty path
is all I see,
because love≠emotion
from God's perspective,
but commitment.

But willingness will do.
Will you?

I know.
I've not been the best.
That's the problem, I confess.
But to get better,
first step.
Not imagined, not "forget it,"
this is real.
Simple.
Why can't you see that?
Can you?

Due
duty
ditto.
Do you see the widow
and the orphan in my eyes?
Or is it a surprise?
The Good Shepherd leaves the flock
to find
the lost
sheep.
You follow the Good Shepherd, don't you?
So you say,
but you walk away,
back to the flock,
your back to me.
Do you think I don't see?
And can He not see
your clear and obvious
hypocrisy?

I see you.
Where are you?
Talking.
But not to me?
What if
you're wrong?
Hey, stop judging me,
without listening,
always needing to be right!
But I'm not.
I'll pray for you.
*silence*

Is there any more?

Say it. No more silence, please,
not any more.

©Gabriel Koulikov
--

God, this hurt to write.
It hurt more to post.

But I hope, maybe, something.

I tried writing something more direct and serious over this last month, but this came out instead. It's been almost and over a year*. Please reply. (*=see below)

If you consider yourself a Christian, and see God's Word as having authority, I'm talking to you.

Why the no James 2, John 13-17, or even Luke 15/John 10 response, so clear? Between those three, all possible perspectives about me are covered-- but there have been none of those! Supposedly Christian, supposedly Bible-based... how can I but doubt? (and why don't you?) Have you ever known anyone else so wanting to convert that you stop talking to him when he needs help the most, and is willing? How can you possibly convert anyone, or otherwise do the Matt. 28:18-20 thing if this is your behavior with one MOST WILLING to, and most wanting to seek mutual commitment/benefit in the process?!
-Note: I don't see talking as the solution, but doing. But not doing plus not talking? How can that be the solution? Like how "collaboration" means "together laboring," not talking. Get it?

I think if we put our heads together and tried SOMETHING, something good might come out. I'm not asking for a free meal. I'm not asking for "just anything." But SOMETHING... something is the solution. Not lack of it, but it's presence.

I've tried to "fix my life" on my own during this last year; it still hasn't worked. Help.

"Hello, my name is Gabe Koulikov, and I'm a compromise addict. I admit I'm a hypocritical apathetic compromiser, but I'm an honest one; I want to change." I have been unable to reach sobriety on my own. Is there no intervention?

In case you didn't catch that last time, yes, this is a literal and deliberate and loud cry for HELP. And it's still there. I've tried to fix it on my own. And it's still there. So, please SOMETHING...

I don't get how my so-called friends so-called "Christians" so-called "Bible believers" could ignore this for over a year and not understand what that would mean.

I know that really "the only One who can help me is God," but for those who supposedly "have God," why not some real help with finding Him? Don't you care whether or not those you know end up in hell and the Lake of Fire forever?

And if you say nothing else, or do nothing else, please at least let me know precisely WHY you each stopped talking with me on such topics of critical importance (if you never read the original post, this does not include you; if you have, it does), as I still have not figured that one out. (minus Elisheva P, Carrie G, and sometimes Esther K, so thanks to them-- though I would like to know why you three often wait months at a time to continue past conversations on such topics) Either private messages or public comments for this topic are fine.

And any comments/questions/feedback from the rest of y'all would be nice. (i.e. from those who don't consider themselves Christians, or who otherwise don't see the Bible as having significant authority over one's life)
--
*For those who don't know what I'm referring to, please read my blog from last year, though some of my perspectives have changed (like recognizing "church," the building and the service, as pagan and not biblical thanks to Frank Viola's explanations and citations in Pagan Christianity, and that now I explicitly articulate myself concerning how comprehensively Bible-based Christianity is the only legitimate/defensible form of Christianity; also, I've started learning biblical Hebrew and Greek), but it's still a close enough "gist."
7 comments|post comment

Obamanation, Day 2: Genocide of the Native Americans [21 Jan 2009|10:33pm]
First, some historical points, then follows mostly my opinion/perspectives concerning them:

1) The Native Americans occupying what is currently classified as the continental U.S. were systematically displaced by the government (legal U.S. governmental policy) through a combination of force and manipulation, resulting in a drastic lowering of their population levels.

2) There still exists the governmental department responsible for this destruction, still receiving our tax funding to continue their "work": the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

Not all of the destruction was caused by the government. More recent studies that showed that European, etc., diseases cut many tribes' population by half or more before they even had contact with a single immigrant. Enough of the lasting damage was caused by governmental policy, with lasting effects, being targeted and systematic, and with the types of repercussions we have been left with today that I can't help but classify this "governmental policy" as genocide.

Native Americans are arguably the most ignored adult demographic in the U.S. even today. The vast majority of them still live segregated from the rest of society, with a governmental department still taking our taxpayer money to oversee this segregation. While they are free to leave (for the most part), a large majority of them don't do so specifically because of the continued suffering inflicted on them by our government.

What is their oppression strategy? Mostly, it's welfare.

Someone once said poverty is the greatest injustice of all. But how is the poverty of the Native Americans maintained? None of them actually NEED to get jobs; the government is taking care of them. After all, isn't that the most compassionate thing we as a people can do to this historically victimized people group, a people which our very government helped victimize?

And yet, it is that very policy which even THEY realize is largely keeping them from exercising their human abilities of innovation, hard work, compassion, etc., all because of governmentally enabled codependence. The poorest places in the continental U.S. are not inner cities, but Indian Reservations.

From all I've learned over the years, I find it incredibly frustrating that their is still a "bureau of X people group affairs" in this country at all, let alone the one that caused the raping of the land and destruction of indigenous cultures and deaths in the millions just so we can live in relative affluence on eminently domained "government property" today. Probably at least once every month since I learned exactly what happened to these people at the hands of our government, and how all our government has done is "swept it under the rug" with only token acknowledgment in their complicity to this genocide. I call the limited acknowledgments token because the oppression is STILL GOING ON! It is the biggest stain of hypocrisy across the face of this supposedly "advanced, civilized culture" and "free nation" that has never gone away, never even tried to be washed off, just some make up applied so we can pretend it's not there anymore.

My memory of specific emotional motivations from a decade ago isn't very reliable, but at least once I remember thinking that this one thing was enough of a reason for me to try to "save the world," or this country, or whatever, in some kind of systemic way, that this was one problem that has never gone away, and the American people haven't really done anything substantial about it.

It has been our common, ugly heritage that we have continued to monetarily support. Are you an American tax payer? Then you give money to support bigoted oppression, just as your predecessors did. And the oppression of these people by our people continues to this day, under this government. In a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, the only people who can change this are we the people. Or not.

--

More provocative this time?
post comment

Obamanation, Day 1: in/augury/shun [20 Jan 2009|11:42pm]
I could go on and on about how I totally thought the Obama birth certificate fiasco was a myth, disproved by Snopes, etc.

Suffice it to say: read, read, read. (these are all from the same website because it's the only place online I was able to find easily with much information that was less than a month old)

So, this was sort of the straw that broke the camel's back. Despite all the criticisms I had about all the mountains of unconstitutional things this government has been doing for the last century and a half, both de facto and explicit, I was still willing to hold out that this government was at least a legitimate continuation of the constitutional government that had been getting more and more corrupt as time went on, but that it still had the constitution as its core, despite however many layers had grown to cover it, and could potentially be reformed (i.e. "uncorrupted") in the opposite direction as well. No longer. All levels of government must reject the constitution as the highest law for Obama to be sworn in as president with this constitutional requirement left hanging, the Supreme Court itself simply denying it, rather than looking at the evidence! If ANY level of the government took the constitution seriously, we would be in civil war right now. Both the Revolutionary War and the Civil War were fought over less. (let's not forget all those other straws on the camel's back now!)

I figure the least I can do is exercise what free speech the current administration has seen fit to allot me, so every day that Obama is in office is another day to expose government corruption, and develop systemic solutions to this system-wide problem. Okay, so it finally gave me the motivation to post my ideas and things about my life online more frequently, as I think I've been saying I should do for years now. I will put everything out in the open, rather than keeping much to myself (at least as far as my online self had been concerned-- being open to share everything with everyone has its space-time-matter-energy and biological limits), or otherwise scattered across half the internet.

All those people called America "The Great Satan" can eat their hearts out, as we are now, quite literally, an obamanation.

--

Okay, so I like to write in flowery language as much as the next man, er vegetable, but I've tried to keep my language more to the point and analytical for quite some time. I'm still doing the "serious and joking at the same time, unless I clearly indicate otherwise" bit. What do you think? More flowers, fewer flowers? Mix up the botanical varieties a little? Back to creativity + analysis? Specific suggestions?
-EDIT: Actually, this is more "provocative" than flowery. I'm still learning English. Also, I like botany.


Feel free to please link sources more insightful and conclusive than what I was able to find.
6 comments|post comment

My mom finally kicked me out of her house! [06 Jan 2009|10:12am]
And I've never felt happier.
post comment

Note to Self [10 Nov 2008|05:55pm]
Start a movement to repeal the 16th amendment (a la prohibition?).

Take a long visit Hong Kong before you decide whether to definitely move there.

Learn to defend yourself.

Calm down.

3 rules of reality.

Exercise your will as a matter of course. (5-D)
-Correct your course along the way, of course!

Plan to fail, so you don't fail to plan! (and prepare)

Work every day that's a work day. Work all the time you work. Play all the time you play. Big picture, creative/analytical (re)evaluation of life, etc., with the rest. (Rest)

No more drugs; yes more better-than-drug alternatives. Continual always. (Way)

Find people by starting inside yourself and working your way outward. (oxygen deprivation triage)

Where is respect?

-incomplete-

Flash, flash, flash. *tone*

To be continued...?

Wow; that was almost poetic.
1 comment|post comment

Procrastination, optimality, and 2008 voting-for-what reasons summary [03 Nov 2008|07:00pm]
It looks like I'm not going to post my reasoning for voting yes on California props. 2, 4, and 8 and Alan Keyes for president before election day. Gist reasons: 2- same as for my quasi-veganism; 4- ridiculous non-enforcement of child predator laws by abortion providers, and the schizophrenic laws regarding both minors and abortion; 8-all marriage laws descriminate against unmarried individuals, and *somewhat* less legitimization of sexual promiscuity based on pseudoscience. Alan Keyes: below.

The issues are enduring, though, as are the reasons behind why I'm voting as I am (on these issues), so I'll still post them (whether tomorrow or later). It will be interesting to see who still cares about such things at that point.

Here is something:

Vote for a President who ACTUALLY represents you!

The U.S. is both a representative democracy and a constitutional republic.

I encourage everyone who can to vote November 4th, and that you who vote to select the representative who actually best represents what you stand for, and who you trust most to uphold the constitution.

Don't just vote for the two most popular candidates because you feel you "have no choice." Because you do. This is what it means to vote.

Whether it's Ralph Nadar, Ron Paul, Alan Keyes, or anyone else, be sure to vote for your chosen candidate positively, because you would have them to be president, not mainly to "vote against the other guy."

The only way for the people's voice to be heard is to not go with media, or money, or manipulation, but to vote who you know to be the best. Then your vote will help inspire others, bring our nation closer to reform, and make the government fear the people, rather than the other way around.

Alan Keyes has my vote. Who has yours?

*Be inspired*

http://www.selfgovernment.us/
48 comments|post comment

Sac: Measure M and Public Schooling [03 Nov 2008|06:29pm]
I was debating back and forth whether to vote yes on Measure M, a Sacramento County community college funding bill.

I don't support public "education" at all (I am for self-directed education), but for some reason, public community colleges strike me as different.

First, it is the least corrupt of all public schools. Most of the corruption found at community colleges are by-proxy influence from other elements of public education

Second, it provides low-cost education to those trying to do something better with their lives.

Third, community colleges typically have smaller classroom size and teachers actually interested in seeing their students educated.

While I still have some pedagogical objections to any system which divides individuals studying a subject into "teacher" and "students," I decided if I am in favor of public libraries, that I should vote yes on this measure this time, at least until I've thought through a more comprehensive position on public education that takes community colleges into account.

Somehow, I doubt it will survive this election.
post comment

Friends and politics always mix. Especially when they don't. [03 Nov 2008|04:52pm]
I am so frustrated with this country and its population! I'm sure it has something to do with my not ever being able to significantly influence anyone on any topic of significant moral consequence. It's almost like everyone's running off a cliff faster and faster, and there's nothing you can do to stop them. (though, of course, that is not true)

Part of me wants to take off for Hong Kong right now, on a loan, leave everything behind-- start over from scratch.

But that is not sustainable. Patience. Calm. And characterize in ways most consistent with reality.

Focus.
2 comments|post comment

And now, the continuation... (2008 U.S. election) [30 Oct 2008|12:57pm]
I'll be posting at least one entry each day over the next 4 days discussing my line of reasoning for why I'm voting the way I am on California Propositions 2, 4, and 8 (at least), and for President. Those who've checked out my LJ profile page over the last 8 months already know I'm voting for Alan Keyes.

I'm going to post my major lines of reasoning; I'll probably miss a few points, which I should make up for in the comments. I need to be okay with posting what I can, and not worrying about being utterly comprehensive, as this combined with procrastination are the reasons I don't post so often.

As usual, the things I have come to understand as most important are also the most controversial, which, actually, is WHY they are the most controversial, BECAUSE of how large-scale important they are.

My Presidential VoteCollapse )

Voting for a RepresentativeCollapse )

Voting for LegislationCollapse )

I've mentioned this dichotomy between voting for policy/legislation vs. voting for representatives/candidates here because it is part of a more general discussion which overlaps into the lines of reasoning I have used to vote the way I am voting for the propositions and for President. This is the simple to understand (I hope; please tell me if it's not) and most general philosophical foundation I'm coming from when deciding how to vote "in general." Therefore, since it will inevitably come up in my subsequent political postings, I figured it best to tackle it by itself first so as to make my positions clearer when I present them, and to hopefully get some people to think through what their vote means. A few more related points will probably be added to subsequent posts as I think of them, or in the comments to this post, but I want you all to be thinking about this FIRST to be thinking about as you read my reasons for voting for each prop. and the Pres.

Other assumptions which influence political decisionsCollapse )

So, to sum up, "why should a U.S. citizen vote any particular way at all?" In voting legislation, a step-by-step process toward your decided goal, analyzing the risks vs. the benefits, should be used. In voting for representatives, vote for the person in the running who represents you. (important related issues not tackled: "What if none of those in the running actually represent you?" the creation of government policy and legislation, candidates which you vote for who are not representatives, etc.)

Thoughts? (political, related to politics, or otherwise?)
post comment

Concerning the upcoming U.S. election. + opinion (who would have guessed?) [20 Oct 2008|10:09pm]
Over the next few days and weeks, I plan to post about what I believe to be the most important issues in this upcoming election (state and national), how I am voting, and the lines of reasoning I have used to come to those conclusions.

...and the comments section fun will ensue.

I've decided to do this partly to "force" myself to talk about politics. Believe it or not, out of all the areas I concern myself with (i.e. every area of life and living imaginable), the area of "politics" ranks as close as any to my least favorite, ranking pretty close to things like interpersonal "drama," personal preferences in relatively inconsequential areas of life, etc. Can you think why? Though, I have to say, the social duty aspect makes me concern myself with it significantly more than other areas I am little interested in. That, and it adds spice to my fiction writing. And it intersects advertising-propaganda-education-entertainment in a myriad of ways. This makes me think it would be so cool to have a wiki-type program that can show the various links between things graphically, and the quality of those links, all on the screen simultaneously. And if it doesn't exist, I want to help invent it, as I think I would find something like that a most useful organizational tool. [end tangent]

Does anyone else think that this upcoming election is ridiculous? (meaning both entertainingly humorous AND worthy of ridicule) Perhaps tragically ridiculous?
20 comments|post comment

I'm moving to Hong Kong [08 Sep 2008|09:39pm]
(Link to the "moving to Hong Kong" poem I wrote a few weeks back, in 3 parts)
--

I set Summer 2012 as my deadline; seems like more than enough time to get my act together, and setting a deadline will keep me from procrastinating indefinitely.

I'll try to start my own business after I get there. Something having to do with world-wide science education (probably; this will be the ISA, PS A/R "saving the world" deal, at least in terms of "doing my part" that I've kept talking with everyone about ad naseum for the last 8 years or so). Teaching English seems to be the trademark "easiest way to make lots of money in China," so everyone keeps telling me; if true, I'll probably start with that until I raise enough seed capital.

China doesn't get to mess with Hong Kong significantly until 2047, while the U.S. government keeps messing with us more and more now. (Patriot Act, no-justification-needed property detainment at the border, taxpayer funded abortion, euthanasia, et al, and it keeps getting worse every year) My experience with Survivors also made me see firsthand that this is no joke; the police very often decide to harass, intimidate, and/or arrest you just because they disagree with your message, even if you are being careful to follow every law, ask the police what law they want to arrest you for supposedly breaking, and so much more. At least in Hong Kong, I will have 35 years before my home becomes a police state. And that thought makes me very happy, indeed. Heck, I might even go back to school! Law school, linguistics, hardcore PhD-grade scientific research; the possibilities seem endless. I might even find someone with similar life-goals/interests who I can speak in Lojban with on a consistent basis face-to-face!

A few more personal pointsCollapse )

Questions? Comments? Somehow I get the impression nobody really cares about these things anymore.
10 comments|post comment

Cast out of the outcasts [03 Aug 2008|11:54pm]
In early college, when I first looked back at my high school years, I noticed that I mainly associated the "outcast group" at school, but even then, I felt like an "outcast" among them.

It wasn't until recently that I realized/recognized that this (feeling? reality?) is still true.
5 comments|post comment

To Beth Yeshua on Shabbat [07 Jun 2008|11:20pm]
I finally successfully forced myself to go to Beth Yeshua today. I got up late, and after breakfast and the bike ride there, I managed to get there a few minutes before services ended. I surprisingly saw two adults I recognized from pro-life activism there (actually, activist parents, which I remembered meeting through some of Scott Lively's community organizing several years ago, since I've seen a certain Langill's children on many activist occasions).

I mostly talked with and spent the afternoon and evening with a young couple who moved here from Florida 3 years ago, Will and Rachel, which was nice. I got to ride my bike home from near Discovery Park, which was <3 <3 <3 nature bike riding sunset plant river bunny deer gnat wonderland. (*splash!*)

Lesson: Gabe is not (necessarily) crazy by-himself arrogant; many other people hold very similar major interpretations of reality. Yay! And they claim potential helpfulness and mutual benefit available with their funderful friends and fellowship madness, which I get to test through practical action and participation in community events and discussions and useful contributions which will go into my notebooks and out the other side into destiny.

I've yet to figure out how art-science-war type they are. That is so my favorite nongame.

But I'm in now. We'll see how it goes, and hopefully also how it all turns out.
3 comments|post comment

The Practical Skeptics Guide to Resisting Societal Corruption [31 May 2008|12:16am]
[ mood | median consistency maybe? ]

Today I wrote out some scattered rough notes for the preface of the the main nonfiction work I've been planning on writing for at least the last 5 years.

The general idea started when I decided to "save the world" in early high school. I then refined it around the time I started "looking for Christian allies" in late 2002.

I didn't have the experience or comprehensive enough understanding to write it before. I think I started because I wanted to get these ideas down while I was redoing my own life. I figured if I integrated the story of what I was going through now into this book (to whatever extent), it might help me get started writing something substantial.

It did.

So everyone who cares: poke me to post at least something within the next 3 days. If people keep hassling me about it, I'm sure to post something, even if it just ends up being today's mostly talking-to-myself notes, and maybe get some feedback.
-What they say about writers being the biggest critics of their own writing is definitely true of me. Well, I'm more critical of my presentation than anything I suppose....

This work I'm writing integrates my "3 rules of reality," where I got them, why they are general principles which apply to everyone, how to apply them, and why I'm so obsessed with the scientific method, what all I meant by PS A/R (ISA), et al.

"So post something already!"

1 comment|post comment

You're going to hell anyway... [29 May 2008|09:13am]
...so why not at least try to do it God's way? Yeah, you'll make mistakes, but at least maybe you'll have a chance! Better than just sitting in your room. And when it's all over, you'll either go to hell anyway, so no loss (no reason NOT to), or maybe you'll actually find and fulfill your God-given purpose in life.

Thank you very much Rachel Imageatp_drvn for giving me an argument that can't be argued against in the GOOD way! There's a bit more to it, but this is the simplified gist.

P.S. We narrowed it down to not treating God (the Truth) as a person, whatever it is that I may "intellectually believe." This ties into several of my irrational fears mentioned last time, so we'll see what happens with all this.
11 comments|post comment

I'm not a Christian after all. [19 May 2008|07:10pm]
So, after over 8 years, I find out I am not a Christian according to the Bible's standard.

Simplified explanation:
I finally recognized the implication of Ezekiel 18 as fully applying to me, which I should have recognized earlier. Apparently both the American Church's propaganda-lies, and my own irrational optimism kept me from making this connection earlier: if you haven't for-all-practical-purposes repented in all areas of sin, you are the person "trusting in his own righteousness," and committing iniquity, and you will die in your sins.

I'm not a Christian, and I never was. And now I am COMPLETELY convinced, rather than a few times before when I merely "had suspicions."

More detailed (long)...Collapse )

I'll get to all the other things I promised I would talk about eventually, God willing, assuming I don't die before then. I do have somewhat more urgent priorities at this time in my life.

So, everyone who said or thought I was evil, self-decieved or some "faking" equivalent, or a hypocrite/compromiser/apathetic was right after all. Yay!

I still like (useful/honest/well thought-out) feedback; I always have. Talk to me, and I will respond to what I can.

-Gabriel Koulikov

[EDIT 6-2-08:] Wherever I mentioned Ezekiel 18 above, I also meant to include Ephesians 4:28. Please excuse the omission.
135 comments|post comment

Updated fiction postings. [18 May 2008|10:31pm]
In case any of you are interested, I'm still writing new fiction (poetry, stories, unclassifiable edutainment, etc.):

Imagechangethesystem

Latest postings.

Table of Contents.
post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Image