how is is that free material on the internet is often more useful than books you have to pay for? like, i'm playing around with lenormand cards (a form of cartomancy similar to tarot, except the deck has way fewer cards and its themes focus more on everyday events than on the abstract stuff tarot tends to go for and a total of two free web pages is proving more useful than any of the glimpses of various books that i've seen on google books. to the point where if some of this stuff
was available in a nicely formatted book form, i would totally pay for it...
(the pages in question are
melissa jozefina's free lenormand cheat sheet - the noun, verb and adjective keywords are pretty useful - and
labyrinthos' card meanings and combinations list, with more general keywords and, well, exactly what it's called, slightly more elaborate definitions and ones for combinations of two cards each. i like them so much that i'm now combining them into a printable "book" myself. maybe if i look around a little more, i'll also find a page with similarly useful longer definitions for each card and add those as well...)
(i am this perfect combination of genuinely not believing in anything supernatural, yet just going ahead and using it anyway if it proves to have useful applications, and i love it. the world does't have to be all black and white. factual accuracy is more important than whether the idea of something makes you feel good, but sometimes, the question of whether something
works is more important than what's true. it's pointless to question whether something is possible when it's very obviously doing
something. rejecting the supernatural explanation doesn't have to mean assuming that there's no explanation at all.)