Conversation
|
Yes, I'll take over the EIC role for this submission! @ThomasA can you supervise the reviewing process? |
|
Yes 👍 |
|
Hi, Sorry this is outside my expertise. |
|
@soolijoo OK, I will try someone else. |
|
@almarklein can you review this replication? |
|
Sure! Is this ready for review at this point? |
|
@rougier I am stuck trying to build the PDF. I cannot use the 'fontawesome' package on my system. XeLaTeX seems to try to call some font-generating stuff that fails. I have TeXlive 2016 installed in Ubuntu (installed directly from TexLive - not Ubuntu repositories). The fontawesome package is installed, but somehow not useable. |
|
@rougier if I comment out |
rescience-template.tex was updated from ReScience/ReScience-submission.
|
If you compile using directly the latex command, what is the output ? |
|
For the fontawesome installation, what is the error in the font generating stuff ? |
|
@rougier By the way, I just by mistake pushed some updates to your repo. Now I do not understand how I actually had the permission to do so? I guess this is not a major problem - the updates are supposed to go in the archive repo anyway. |
|
Regarding fonawesome, making the paper says: I am whining about it here as well: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/369068/how-can-i-use-the-fontawesome-package-with-xelatex |
|
Yes, I can see your changes in my repo. That's totally weird. |
|
Just to be sure, you've also installed the |
|
Yes, it is in the Texlive tree |
|
Oh, the font is bundled with the tex package ? |
|
Yes, fontawesome is included in Texlive. I am getting some help here: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/369068/how-can-i-use-the-fontawesome-package-with-xelatex, but none of it seems to work... |
|
OK, I finally made it work. |
|
I have been looking at this: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/193412/what-is-happening-to-the-quotes and this: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/278251/ligatures-stopped-working-in-xelatex. |
|
Should we simply ignore that |
|
Could you make a PR for the main rescience-template and fix it on this repo then ? |
|
Sorry, I got stuck last week trying to compile the paper for publishing. This week I am swamped with a course I am giving. I hope to pick this back up tomorrow or during the weekend. |
|
@ThomasA Any chance to publish it this week ? |
|
@ThomasA a gentle reminder... |
|
Sorry, I will try to do it tomorrow evening. These days are packed with
teaching and conducting exams tomorrow...
|
|
@rougier could you please rebuild the PDF on rougier/ReScience-submission on your rougier-2017 branch (including the changes it turned out I was able to push to your repo)? I have no XeTeX experience and seem unable to get the fonts set up correctly on my system to make it compile. |
|
Done. |
|
EDITOR This submission has been published and will soon appear at http://rescience.github.io/read/ |
|
This looks good! Thanks to @ThomasA for handling the review, to @rth and @almarklein for reviewing, and to @rougier for doing the replication work! |
AUTHOR
Dear @ReScience/editors,
I request a review for the following replication:
Original article
Title: Weighted Voronoi Stippling
Author(s): Adrian Secord
Journal (or Conference): International Symposium on Non-photorealistic Animation and
Rendering
Year: 2002
DOI: 10.1145/508530.508537
PDF: http://mrl.nyu.edu/~ajsecord/npar2002/npar2002_ajsecord_preprint.pdf
Replication
Author(s): Nicolas P. Rougier
Repository: https://github.com/rougier/ReScience-submission/tree/rougier-2017
PDF: https://github.com/rougier/ReScience-submission/blob/rougier-2017/article/Rougier-2017.pdf
Keywords: Python, Stippling, Voronoi, Computer Graphics, Blue Noise
Language: Python
Domain: Signal Processing
Results
Potential reviewers
EDITOR
February 27, 2017February 28, 2017February 27, 2017April 19, 2017April 28, 2017May 9, 2017