Skip to content

Dependency on random #34

@lehins

Description

@lehins

@phadej would you be ok removing dependency on random completely? Not right now, of course, but once we get to the final implementation of the new random, which is not far at all on the horizon. Reason why I am asking is because we decided it would be best if we just made the SMGen the default RNG for random, in other words, instead of duplicating splitmix algorithm implementation we went for type StdGen = SMGen. This would, of course, require random to depend on splitmix, not the other way around. We could of course just inline the implementation from your package as mentioned here idontgetoutmuch/random#86, but it really seems like an unnecessary duplication of code.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions