On Comments and Poppies

Some people are having trouble leaving comments on this blog. I’ll try to sort it out.

Meanwhile, Brian Busby from Canada has sent this comment on my Poppies 2025 post, which the WordPress algorithm foolishly wouldn’t allow:

Things are a bit different in Canada. They seem mandatory for politicians and talking heads, as if one isn’t allowed on air without one. They are much, much more common than not on our streets.

This being the time of year when the weather turns, the great mistake comes in grabbing a warmer jacket, thus leaving the one with the poppy behind.

And then we have the issue of lost poppies. It’s nearly a national joke (but isn’t because of Remembrance Day). Ours consist of felt over plastic, held by a very slim pin. You are sure to lose it. I myself am on my second with two days to go. I expect these losses have something to do with changing times. Speaking from experience they remain on tweed, but are sure to disappear from a nylon rain jacket.

Read More »

Poppies, 2025

Walking around Huddersfield town centre yesterday morning, I spotted only six people wearing poppies. They were all very old.

On television, by contrast, poppies are mandatory. A women on a panel show not wearing one was assailed by the indignant of the internet. Poor David Lammy in Parliament (who has a lot to worry about at the moment) forgot to wear his the other day, and was criticised and mocked.

For those very much in the public eye, the poppy is mandatory, and can become a fashion statement. On Strictly yesterday Tess and Claudia were both in stunningly plain black dresses, against which the red poppies showed up dramatically.

For such public people, the poppy is mandatory. In ordinary life now, less so, it would seem. A very pleasant lady was running a stall in our local Morrison’s, but was not, I think, doing very good business. Marion and I each bought paper poppies, but she had decorative (metallic, enamelled, bejewelled) for sale. I remarked that the TV people semed always to wear the posh decorative ones. I wondered whether they kept these to wear from year to year, rather than buying new ones every November. ‘I bet they do,’ said the stallholder, maybe thinking of her lackof customers.

Read More »

Ernest Raymond and ‘Tell England’

[This is a version of the chapter I wrote for the Handbook of British Literature and Culture of the First World War (2021) (edited by Ralf Schneider and Jane Potter).]

We read some war books because of their excellence as novels, others for what they tell us about the war itself. Ernest Raymond’s Tell England, while not without literary and documentary merits, is most interesting for what it suggests about the needs and enthusiasms of its readers. Reprinted fourteen times in 1922, and six times in the next year, by 1939 it had sold 300,000 copies, and subsequent editions stayed in print for forty years. (Raymond 1969, 69) The book’s material, however, would, over the next fifty years, be re-imagined, by Raymond and others; Tell England would become a major film in 1930, and Raymond would return to its subject, the Gallipoli landings, in two more novels, and in his autobiography.

Image

The book appeared a a time when most publishers were convinced that there was no market for novels about the war. A nation counting its dead had little taste for the thrilling tales of military action that had encouraged public morale during the war years. War books that appeared now were mostly pious memorials, proud regimental histories and the memoirs of generals and politicians. There was no market for any novels that might try to cast a less than flattering light upon the soldiers who had given so much for their country. Tell England, however, managed to appeal exactly to the taste of the times.

Read More »

Escapers in Two Wars

I’ve added another paper to the blog. It’s based on a talk I gave a few years ago, about escape narratives in the two World Wars.

It was written for a conference about ‘Reading to Escape‘ (organised by Shafquat Towheed of the Open University). I was thinking especially about the pleasures that the very popular escape books and films of the mid-century offered their readers – but also about how the conventions of the escape genre had been established in the earlier war.

You can read the paper here.

Bennett and Rivers

I’ve just added another paper to the list on the right. It’s one I delivered to an Arnold Bennett conference a few years ago. The topic of the conference was Bennett’s friendships – a good topic, since he had a talent for making friends and interesting acquaintances.

Image
WHR Rivers

My paper is about Bennett’s friendship with the psychologist/anthropologist WHR Rivers, one of the most interesting men of his time. They met through Siegfried Sassoon, and found they had much in common. My paper suggests that Rivers’s ideas were a major influence on Riceyman Steps (especially on the depiction of Joe’s shell-shock, but not just that), and also on the story ‘Elsie and the Child’, which is a sort of short sequel to Riceyman Steps.

Image

If I were writing the paper today, I’d probably also consider Bennett’s 1928 novel Accident, which also deals with trauma.

The paper can be read HERE.

P.S. There seems to be a problem with posting comments to the blog. I’m working on this.

On Bennett’s ‘The Pretty Lady’

I wrote about this for the Handbook of British Literature and Culture of the First World War (2021) (edited by Ralf Schneider and Jane Potter), a work of pretty encyclopaedic scope. I think the was originally intended to appear in time for the War’s centenary, but there were the kind of publishing problems that often attend big projects, and it didn’t appear till rather late, and does not seem to have had much impact. I’ve received no feedback about my contributions, anyway.

I was given some suggestions about suitable texts to write about, and chose Ernest Raymond’s Tell England from the editor’s selection. I suggested The Pretty Lady, which was not on their list, because it is not only a very good novel, but one that, I would argue, gives a more comprehensive picture of wartime London than any other.

Read More »

Back in Business

I’ve neglected this blog over the past couple of years – mostly because my interests have strayed away from the Great War. I still have a strong interest in popular fiction, however, and my reviews of it appear regularly on the Sheffield Hallam Reading 1900-1950 blog.

I’ve been looking through my old essays and papers, recently, though, and have found some that might be of interest to readers of the blog (There are still a goodly number, looking through nearly twenty years of back files, even while new activity has been, to put it mildly, dormant.)

So in the next few weeks I shall be uploading some of these pieces, in the hope that they will find readers. I’ll be starting off with a couple about Arnold Bennett. Essays on Rose Allatini and Kipling will follow. Probably others.

Book blog success (so they say)

I’ve had an email from a setup called Feedspot which says that Great War Fiction is ranked second among military book blogs. Which is very flattering, though a bit bothering. I’ve neglected the blog horribly over the past year, and it’s not what it was.

Does that mean that other military book blogs are in an even worse state? If so, that’s a pity.

Over the years, my attention has been diverted away from the Great War. I was getting too used to the material, and it wasn’t surprising me as often as it used to back in the day. It’s eighteen years since this blog began. You can’t blame me fro wanting to move on.

Not that I’ve totally neglected the War. Recently I’ve re-read two war novels – Philip MacDonald’s excellent Patrol and William J. Locke’s not-so excellent The Rough Road, and have written about them for the Sheffield Hallam Popular Fiction gatherings and website. Maybe I’ll blog about The Rough Road and its depiction of Tommies here too, when I’ve time.

I’m occasionally asked whether the blog is still in business, and the answer is yes – but don’t be surprised if it goes dormant for a while. Having focused very much on war literature for a long time, I need to broaden my horizons. At the moment my two obsessions are the poetry of Catullus and the terrific new novel James by Percival Everett (about the brightest novelist around these days). Neither of these have a lot to do with the Great War, so I won’t be writing about them here. But I haven’t gone totally away. Watch this space.

A Miserable Kipling

Here, from the Lyttelton Times, a New Zealand newspaper of 1911, is yet another proof of the strange side-effects of Rudyard Kipling’s immense celebrity:

Image

Humanities

After I retired as a teacher, I applied to Oxford Brookes to research a Ph.D. on the prose of the Great War. They were welcoming, and I had a good and productive time there. (I was very fortunate in having Jane Potter, who had written brilliantly on Great War fiction, as one of my supervisors.)

It is gloomy reading, therefore, to learn that there are going to be major cuts in the English Department there, as well as History, Film, Anthropology, Publishing and Architecture. The Music and Mathematics departments will be closed completely.

There are good people in the English Department at Brookes, and it is very sad to think of their jobs being at risk (and of the opportunities for students being reduced). The same is true of other departments, I’m sure – I knew a postgraduate researching Music, and got the impression that the department was very lively indeed.

Read More »