Description
Hard Hack is UCSD’s premier hardware-focused hackathon, bringing together engineers, developers, and innovators to build tech for tomorrow. This year’s theme, "Tech for Tomorrow," challenges participants to develop solutions in sustainability, healthcare, and smart devices—tackling real-world issues with cutting-edge hardware and software.
What makes Hard Hack special?
- Hardware-focused: Unlike traditional hackathons, Hard Hack emphasizes hardware innovation. Teams will have access to development boards, sensors, and other tools to bring their ideas to life.
- Industry Support: Engage with mentors from top tech companies, attend exclusive workshops, and receive feedback from industry professionals.
- Beginner-Friendly: Whether you're a seasoned hacker or a first-timer, our team and mentors will support you every step of the way!
Requirements
To be eligible for judging, teams must submit the following on Devpost:
✅ Project Name & Description – Explain the problem you’re solving and your approach.
✅ Hardware & Software Used – List any technologies, sensors, or platforms you utilized.
✅ Code Repository – Provide a GitHub link or equivalent.
✅ Demo Video (Optional, Recommended) – A 2-3 minute video showcasing your project.
✅ Presentation (Optional) – Any additional materials to support your project.
Prizes
Gift Cards
Gift Cards
Gift Cards
Digikey Hardware Kit
Raffled out to groups who developed with Digikey sponsored hardware.
Devpost Achievements
Submitting to this hackathon could earn you:
Judges
Karcher Morris
Professor
YC Wang
Digikey
Judging Criteria
-
Innovation
Measures originality and creativity. Scores range from minor modifications of existing technology (1) to groundbreaking solutions with potential global impact (5) -
Technical Complexity
Evaluates the technical challenge involved. Basic projects with simple interactions score lower (1), while projects with advanced hardware, sophisticated programming, and major technical hurdles score highest (5). -
Utility
Assesses real-world applicability. Trivial projects score lowest (1), while those addressing critical global challenges with high usability and impact score highest (5). -
Engineering Process
Judges how well teams plan and execute their project. A haphazard approach scores lowest (1), while a structured, professional engineering process with clear goals, milestones, and best practices scores highest (5). -
Communication
Rates how effectively teams present their project. A disorganized, unclear presentation scores lowest (1), while a compelling, engaging, and professional presentation that leaves a strong impression scores highest (5).
Questions? Email the hackathon manager
Tell your friends
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.


