Description

Hard Hack is UCSD’s premier hardware-focused hackathon, bringing together engineers, developers, and innovators to build tech for tomorrow. This year’s theme, "Tech for Tomorrow," challenges participants to develop solutions in sustainability, healthcare, and smart devices—tackling real-world issues with cutting-edge hardware and software.

What makes Hard Hack special?

  • Hardware-focused: Unlike traditional hackathons, Hard Hack emphasizes hardware innovation. Teams will have access to development boards, sensors, and other tools to bring their ideas to life.
  • Industry Support: Engage with mentors from top tech companies, attend exclusive workshops, and receive feedback from industry professionals.
  • Beginner-Friendly: Whether you're a seasoned hacker or a first-timer, our team and mentors will support you every step of the way!

Requirements

Submission Requirements

To be eligible for judging, teams must submit the following on Devpost:
Project Name & Description – Explain the problem you’re solving and your approach.
Hardware & Software Used – List any technologies, sensors, or platforms you utilized.
Code Repository – Provide a GitHub link or equivalent.
Demo Video (Optional, Recommended) – A 2-3 minute video showcasing your project.
Presentation (Optional) – Any additional materials to support your project.

Hackathon Sponsors

Prizes

$1,050+ in prizes
+ other prizes
Gift Cards
$350 in cash
1 winner

Gift Cards
$350 in cash
1 winner

Gift Cards
$350 in cash
1 winner

Digikey Hardware Kit
1 winner

Raffled out to groups who developed with Digikey sponsored hardware.

Devpost Achievements

Submitting to this hackathon could earn you:

Judges

 Karcher Morris

Karcher Morris
Professor

YC Wang

YC Wang
Digikey

Judging Criteria

  • Innovation
    Measures originality and creativity. Scores range from minor modifications of existing technology (1) to groundbreaking solutions with potential global impact (5)
  • Technical Complexity
    Evaluates the technical challenge involved. Basic projects with simple interactions score lower (1), while projects with advanced hardware, sophisticated programming, and major technical hurdles score highest (5).
  • Utility
    Assesses real-world applicability. Trivial projects score lowest (1), while those addressing critical global challenges with high usability and impact score highest (5).
  • Engineering Process
    Judges how well teams plan and execute their project. A haphazard approach scores lowest (1), while a structured, professional engineering process with clear goals, milestones, and best practices scores highest (5).
  • Communication
    Rates how effectively teams present their project. A disorganized, unclear presentation scores lowest (1), while a compelling, engaging, and professional presentation that leaves a strong impression scores highest (5).

Questions? Email the hackathon manager

Tell your friends

Hackathon sponsors

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.