
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.32 T | SHA-256 @ 1,018 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 54s | - | |
| $15.81 B | Scrypt @ 2.76 PH/s | 580 MW | 1,375 confs | 1d 3m | 24x slower | |
| $9.28 B | SHA-256 @ 6.60 EH/s | 89 MW | 864 confs | 6d 12h | 154x slower | |
| $6.24 B | RandomX @ 5.15 GH/s | 32 MW | 12,297 confs | 17d 22h | 424x slower | |
| $4.20 B | Scrypt @ 2.99 PH/s | 627 MW | 524 confs | 22h 16m | 22x slower | |
| $3.64 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 44 MW | 15,405 confs | 13d 4h | 312x slower | |
| $1.35 B | Etchash @ 206 TH/s | 422 MW | 8,848 confs | 1d 9h | 33x slower | |
| $420.34 M | X11 @ 3.13 PH/s | 5.02 MW | 63,803 confs | 115d 22h | 2,741x slower | |
| $120.64 M | RandomX @ 126 MH/s | 796 KW | 1,086,920 confs | 1y 364d | 17,253x slower | |
| $93.10 M | KawPow @ 4.02 TH/s | 19 MW | 42,308 confs | 29d 9h | 695x slower | |
| $74.23 M | Eaglesong @ 118 PH/s | 5.73 MW | 847,456 confs | 101d 10h | 2,399x slower | |
| $323,710 | RandomX @ 3.43 MH/s | 21 KW | 1,431,779 confs | 73y 300d | 637,130x slower | |
| $110,173 | KawPow @ 2.77 GH/s | 13 KW | 122,765,508 confs | 116y 286d | 1,007,927x slower |