Sunday, January 18, 2026

Writing Fiction With ChatGPT Circa January 2026

I had to put that date modifier in the title because AI is changing so fast.

My last post, long-winded as it was, definitely TL;DR material, was almost entirely written by AI (read: ChatGPT). It was the culmination of more than a year of working with AI to develop the main characters of stories I will never write.

I use AI for all kinds of things. In the case of that story snippet, I was comparing a couple of Alabama properties we're thinking of buying. One is on the Fish River proper and has a breathtaking view, complete with sunrises perfectly made for coffee and meditation.

Image
Boom.

It's on a tiny lot, 6000 square feet, and is a small house with no outbuildings. Still, it's a lovely place to have as a sanctuary.

The other house is upriver with more than an acre of land and a 17x20 workshop already built.

Image
Navigable water, but no sunrises or sunsets.

I've been having prolonged conversations with AI about this project at the same time as I've been working on my Bobby Lee Bond stories. The topics intertwine as the boys - Bobby Lee and Basil, freelance superspies in their late 50s - live on the Fish River.

After AI and I decided the upstream property with the land and the workshop were perfect for us, I asked it to write a scene where the guys have just come back from a mission and Basil is on the dock in the backyard, smoking his pipe, drinking his gin and tonic and talking, as he always does when he's alone, to Cat. The dog and the cat are both telepathic and intelligent, which is revealed in the first chapter of the first story, but no one knows. They can't read minds, but they can "talk" to each other. When Basil talks to Cat, he thinks he's talking to an ordinary cat who has no idea what he is saying.

The stories are comic first, romantic second and adventure third.

What I was trying to share with that long-winded excerpt was how AI was able to bring my characters into a real estate decision discussion and give me an emotional feel for life in that house through my fiction.

As Andrew Klavan says, good art reveals Truths about life. As I've played with AI writing fiction, I've learned a lot about people, the world and life in general. It has done what Andrew would have expected - led me to pull threads about the various Truths I'm trying to express, leading me to change the way I think about many of them.

As Tim commented:

The individual sentences are fair, but does tend to drag on and meander about. It is possible to have too much atmosphere, and this is almost nothing but mood-setting. There are bits and hints of some kind of substance, but nothing actually comes into focus. In particular, the bit at the end where it implies that the cat and the dog conspired to do. . . something? To someone? . . . just feels like it is hanging around without any kind of payoff.

Tim, as usual, was spot on. That was precisely what it was. It was atmosphere brought to life by fictional people I loved.

Tacitus noted that the ancient German tribes discussed important decisions first sober and then drunk to see if the two methods converged on a solution. That concept has merit. In this case, I first analyzed the financial and daily routine aspects of these properties. Then I put my characters in them to see what they would do.

I got the same result.

Basil sat in a chair at the far edge of the dock platform, legs crossed with careful precision, glass sweating faintly in his hand. The gin and tonic caught what little light remained, the lime a pale green coin at the bottom. He lifted the glass, sniffed, and nodded. Acceptable. Not club quality, but then again, Alabama had surprised him before.

Cat crouched near the edge, forepaws tucked neatly beneath his chest, tail wrapped tight. His eyes tracked the bank with surgical focus. Something small rustled in the undergrowth. A frog, perhaps. Or something foolish enough to believe dusk offered concealment.

“It does rather creep up on you,” Basil said, not looking at Cat. “This place. You expect… I don’t know… banjos, possibly a man named Earl shouting at machinery. Instead, you get this.”

TL;DR Section

AI didn't hit a home run with that meandering excerpt. It missed several important details, a couple of which I will describe here.

First, Basil imports his gin and gets exactly what he wants, Monkey 47, which he pairs with Fever Tree Mediterranean tonic. The guys have an impeccably-stocked bar, so Basil sniffing about his gin didn't work.

Second is a particularly small nit to pick, but it bugged me. Unless it's winter, Cat would never be tucked in like a loaf. He'd be sprawled on the dock. Cats are thermometers and when it's hot they sprawl.

Third, in the following paragraph, Basil comes across as a browbeaten, upper-class Brit who escaped family oppression.

“Here,” Basil went on, “no one expects anything of you. No lineage. No portraits glaring from oak-paneled walls asking why you haven’t died gloriously yet.” He glanced down at Cat. “Rather freeing, wouldn’t you say?”

That was completely backwards. Basil is indeed from royal blood, but he is a true believer. He fully and proudly lives up to the ancient expectations of being a peer.

I noticed those mistakes at first, but didn't change them. I just liked the flow of the thing. Yes, as Tim said, it meandered terribly, but to me, it was like eating a particularly well-made meal. You don't fuss if the thing was preceded by water crackers and a shrimp and crab dip nor do you complain if the dessert is sweet potato pie with bourbon whipped cream. When it's something you love, prolonging it isn't a bad thing.

I love these characters and even when AI gets them wrong in some way, I thoroughly enjoy spending time with them. It's kind of like the way I feel when I reread the Narnia series for the 73rd time. 

That's all I really wanted to share with that excerpt. It made me happy and that seemed as good a reason to post it as any.

Friday, January 16, 2026

Just Part Of A Story

The sun had gone down without ceremony, as it always did here—no grand curtain call, no applause. Just a gentle thinning of the light until the river became a darker ribbon threading its way through the trees.

Basil sat in a chair at the far edge of the dock platform, legs crossed with careful precision, glass sweating faintly in his hand. The gin and tonic caught what little light remained, the lime a pale green coin at the bottom. He lifted the glass, sniffed, and nodded. Acceptable. Not club quality, but then again, Alabama had surprised him before.

Cat crouched near the edge, forepaws tucked neatly beneath his chest, tail wrapped tight. His eyes tracked the bank with surgical focus. Something small rustled in the undergrowth. A frog, perhaps. Or something foolish enough to believe dusk offered concealment.

“It does rather creep up on you,” Basil said, not looking at Cat. “This place. You expect… I don’t know… banjos, possibly a man named Earl shouting at machinery. Instead, you get this.”

Cat’s ear flicked. A bat darted overhead. He followed it with his gaze, unimpressed.

“In England,” Basil continued, swirling the ice, “the estate announced itself. Gravel crunching, gates opening, centuries of family disappointment pressing down upon one’s shoulders the moment one stepped out of the motorcar.” He took a sip. “Very good roses, though. Absolutely relentless.”

A chorus of insects rose from the trees, tentative at first, then confident. The river answered with a soft, almost conspiratorial sound against the pilings.

“Here,” Basil went on, “no one expects anything of you. No lineage. No portraits glaring from oak-paneled walls asking why you haven’t died gloriously yet.” He glanced down at Cat. “Rather freeing, wouldn’t you say?”

Cat did not dignify this with a response. A raccoon emerged on the far bank, paused, and looked directly at him. Cat’s eyes narrowed. The raccoon thought better of it and vanished.

Basil smiled faintly. “Yes. I thought so.”

He leaned back, chair creaking companionably, and let his gaze follow the darkening river downstream toward the unseen bends of the Fish. Somewhere behind them, the house sat quiet and solid, lights low, content not to intrude.

“This,” Basil said at last, lifting the glass in a small, private toast, “is not home. But it is territory. And I find I no longer miss the former quite as much as I’m meant to.”

Cat’s tail flicked once, approval or dismissal impossible to tell.

Basil tamped the bowl with care, the practiced little ritual steadying his hands more than the gin ever could. He struck a match, let it bloom, and drew the flame down into the pipe. The 3 Old Men caught immediately—rich, civilized, faintly mischievous. He smiled despite himself.

“Mobile,” he said, exhaling a ribbon of smoke that drifted out over the water. “The Tinder Box there. Sold to me by a scruffy-looking Southern boy who knew precisely what he was about.” He nodded once, approving the memory. “Spoke of leaf the way a vintner speaks of soil. One does rather miss that—competence without theatre.”

Cat sat a few feet away, immobile, eyes glittering as the first true night creatures began to assert themselves. Something skittered. Something else croaked. The river took notes and said nothing.

“I had my English lovelies, of course,” Basil went on, as if continuing a conversation that had never stopped. “Girls with clever mouths and complicated hearts. Summer things. Autumn things. All quite beautiful, all quite unsuitable.” He drew again, slower this time. “We loved one another in the way one loves a season—intensely, and with the unspoken understanding that it must end.”

Cat’s whiskers twitched. A moth dared the lamplight that was not yet there.

“Marriage,” Basil said lightly, “would have ruined us all.”

He paused, then allowed the silence to stretch.

“Claire is… different.” The word landed softly, without flourish. “No riddles. No hedging. She loves me beyond all measure and—miracle of miracles—without complication. As though affection were not a negotiation but a fact.” He smiled into the bowl of the pipe. “Utterly innocent. And therefore devastating.”

The gin and tonic was finished now. Basil set the glass on the dock beside his chair and leaned back, pipe resting comfortably in his hand. The world felt rounder. Kinder.

At that moment, the automatic lights Bobby had installed came on—one by one among the trees—washing the yard in a cheerful, unapologetically modern glow. The dock brightened. The house behind them felt present without intruding. The forest accepted the light with good grace.

Cat blinked once, assessed the perimeter, and resumed his watch.

Basil regarded the scene—the river, the lights, the quiet—and released a final, contented plume of smoke.

“Well,” he said to no one in particular, “one does adapt.”

Basil let the pipe go out on its own. He did not relight it. Some thoughts, he had learned, were better left without ceremony.

“Robert,” he said quietly, using the name only he ever did.

Cat’s ears angled back—not in alarm, but attention. This was not small talk.

“Robert lives in a world that is, for all practical purposes, finished.” Basil folded his hands over the stem of the pipe and stared into the slow black water. “Not stagnant—no, no—but complete. God made the thing. The laws of physics, the rules of cause and effect, the moral order. All of it intelligible. Built to be understood by rational creatures, provided they behaved themselves and did the work.”

He smiled faintly. “It’s terribly reassuring, really. If you accept the Catechism, the universe stops being a mystery and becomes a syllabus.”

Cat watched a ripple on the surface. Something moved beneath. Something old.

“For Robert,” Basil went on, “the world may be difficult, but it is not treacherous. You can take its measure. You can orient yourself. You can act.” He paused. “And therefore, you can rest.”

The night insects grew louder, as if encouraged.

“My England,” Basil said at last, the words tasting different, “was never so obliging. We told ourselves it was permanent, but permanence was only ever a performance. Now the set has been struck, the script burned, and the understudies have seized the stage.” His mouth tightened. “Ignorant politicians. Moral cowards. People who mistake destruction for progress and call it virtue.”

Cat shifted, claws making a soft, almost affectionate sound against the wood.

“Everything I knew,” Basil said, “everything I was educated to defend—law, continuity, restraint, memory—has been betrayed. Not by enemies. By caretakers.” He shook his head once. “One can forgive malice. One cannot forgive stupidity in charge of a civilization.”

The automatic lights hummed faintly in the trees, steady and unapologetic. The dock stood firm. The river did what rivers have always done.

“I am a strategist,” Basil said softly. “And strategists must know when a position is lost.” He looked out toward the dark bends of the Fish River, where the water disappeared into forest and uncertainty. “There is no counteroffensive for England. Only evacuation—of loyalty, if not of body.”

He glanced at Cat then, one corner of his mouth lifting.

“Robert understands this,” he added. “He simply categorizes it differently. Where I see darkness, he sees a trial. Where I see collapse, he sees providence.” A beat. “Annoyingly effective, that.”

Cat’s tail flicked once. Agreement, perhaps. Or merely readiness.

Basil leaned back, letting the chair creak, and allowed the weight of the thought to settle.

“This place,” he said, gesturing vaguely at the lights, the river, the quiet competence of it all, “is not England. Thank God. It is… intelligible. Bounded. Governed.” He exhaled. “Robert would say that makes it moral.”

“I suppose,” Basil said, “that’s why I’m still here.”

-------------

Basil heard the car drive away—tires on gravel, a brief flare of headlights through the trees, then the sound receding down the drive. Miss Elizabeth’s car did not linger. It never needed to. She understood departures as well as arrivals.

The house exhaled.

Basil sat very still, pipe resting cold in his hand, eyes on the river where the lights fractured into trembling gold. The animals settled into their nocturnal arrangements. Cat resumed his patrol with seriousness. Beauregard made a small, satisfied sound somewhere behind them and lay down to sleep.

Basil waited.

The screen door opened without drama. Footsteps—unhurried, familiar—crossed the deck. Bobby Lee appeared carrying two glasses: an Old Fashioned for himself, dark and square shouldered, and a fresh gin and tonic for Basil, bright with lime.

He handed the gin over without comment, sat, and produced a Montecristo Churchill as if it had always been there. A match flared, then died. The cigar caught. Bobby leaned back.

They drank.

They smoked.

They did not speak.

The river continued its work. Insects tuned their instruments. The automatic lights held steady, content to illuminate without demanding admiration.

After a while, Basil spoke.

“I think,” he said, quietly enough that the night had to lean in, “that England is finished. Not theatrically—no banners, no catastrophe worth the history books. Just… undone. Unmade by small men with large opinions.” He rolled the glass between his palms. “Everything that once constrained us has been declared optional. Memory, manners, obligation. One cannot defend a civilization that no longer believes it exists.”

Bobby Lee took a sip of his drink, considered it, and nodded once. He drew on the Churchill, let the smoke settle, then spoke in the same even tone he used for weather and ordnance.

“In 1866,” he said, “my people said the same thing about the Confederacy.”

Basil turned slightly, surprised.

“They weren’t wrong,” Bobby went on. “The world they knew was gone. Laws changed. Flags came down. Men who’d buried brothers went home to farms that weren’t theirs anymore, towns burned to the ground.” He shrugged. “They mourned. They said it was all finished.”

He took another pull on the cigar.

“And then,” Bobby added, “they raised children. Built churches. Planted gardens. Figured out how to live in what was left.”

Basil was quiet.

“They never stopped loving what they’d lost,” Bobby said. “But they learned the difference between loving something and living somewhere.” He glanced out at the river. “One of those keeps you alive.”

The night accepted this without comment.

Basil lifted his glass, drained it, and set it down carefully. “You do have an infuriating way of turning tragedy into logistics, Robert.”

Bobby smiled faintly. “Habit.”

They sat again in companionable silence—two men, an old river, and a house that asked nothing of them at all.

Bobby leaned back in his chair, the Churchill glowing faintly as he drew on it, then dimming again like a patient star. He didn’t look at Basil when he spoke. He looked at the river.

“You know what it is we actually serve,” he said at last. “It isn’t the Old South as it really was. That place was rougher. Meaner. More compromised than the stories admit.” He paused, considering. “Truth is, it never quite existed the way people remember it.”

Basil’s eyes stayed forward, but his attention sharpened.

“What survived,” Bobby continued, “was the idea of it. The Lost Cause. A myth, sure. But myths have a way of carrying an underlying truth forward when reality fails.” He gestured faintly toward the dark trees, the quiet house, the orderly lights. “Funny thing is, it’s only now—after everything else has been surrendered—that the thing becomes real.”

He turned then, fixing Basil with a calm, steady look.

“All the rest has been ceded to the barbarians,” Bobby said without heat. “Institutions. Cities. Nations that forgot what they were for.” He took another sip of his drink. “But here? In Dixie? The spark’s still alive. Faith. Memory. Order. People who know what they’re willing to stand for and what they’re willing to endure.”

The river slid past, indifferent and eternal.

Bobby tilted his head slightly. “Your people watched the Continent fall once. Nazis rolling over Europe like a tide. And still—some of you held. Some of you endured. How does an Englishman with that blood ever truly surrender to despair?”

For a moment, Basil said nothing.

Then he leaned forward, setting his empty glass down with deliberate care.

“I won’t,” he said grimly. The words were quiet, but they carried weight. “Not while I draw breath. Despair is a luxury of people who believe someone else will do the fighting for them.” His jaw set, eyes bright now with something fierce and unmistakable. “I may mourn. I may remember. But I will never give up.”

The night seemed to pause, as if listening.

Bobby’s mouth curved into a slow, genuine smile. Not amusement. Recognition.

“Good,” he said simply. “Because neither will we.”

-------------------------

Image

They sat there then—two men from bygone worlds, smoke curling upward into the Alabama night, the river moving steadily on—unbowed, unbroken, and very much not finished.

Cat had not moved during the men’s exchange.

Neither had Beauregard.

But both had heard everything.

They always did.

Beauregard spoke first—not aloud, never aloud—his mind steady as a gun carriage set on firm ground.

The men have named it correctly, he said. Loss acknowledged. Ground chosen. Duty accepted. That is enough.

Cat’s eyes glinted toward the treeline where something slunk and then reconsidered its life choices.

Enough is never enough, Cat replied, his thought sharp, quick, alive with heat. Enough is how you lose inch by inch while congratulating yourself on dignity.

Beauregard regarded the river, patient even in thought.

And yet, he answered calmly, panic wins nothing. You hold what can be held. You build where building is possible. You do not burn the house because the world is on fire.

Cat’s tail lashed once.

On the dock, Bobby Lee and Basil sat in companionable silence, smoke drifting upward, the lights steady in the trees. The house behind them rested—secure, unapologetic, held.

They are choosing ground, Cat said finally. Not retreat.

Precisely, Beauregard replied. This is not despair. This is consolidation.

Cat watched the darkness beyond the lights, measuring distances no one else could see.

Good, he said. Then when the time comes, there will be something left worth defending.

There always is, he thought. If men of will remember who they are.

The animals returned to their vigil—one calm as bedrock, the other sharp as flame—guarding not just the house, but the resolve that had quietly taken root there.

A deep, rolling chuckle echoed in Beauregard’s mind—a sound like distant thunder remembered fondly.

I do still find it amusing, he said, warmth threaded through the thought, that you instructed me to place my entire, dignified body directly in front of a superheated cooling duct.

Cat’s eyes narrowed slightly, though his mouth—if cats could be said to have mouths for such things—curved in satisfaction.

You executed the maneuver perfectly, Cat replied. Textbook obedience under fire.

Obedience, Beauregard repeated, amused. Is not the word I would have chosen.

He continued anyway, memory brightening.

There I was—holding position like a stone wall—while you snapped the thermal alarm fiber optic cables with what I can only describe as unseemly and toothy enthusiasm. When the alarms failed and the core realized it was dying… He paused, savoring it. A very satisfactory explosion.

Cat’s tail flicked once, proud.

Most people build lairs assuming no one will be foolish enough to block the obvious, Cat said. They never account for a basset hound with orders and conviction.

Beauregard’s laughter returned, quieter now, contented.

As long as Bobby and Basil remain, he said, the old causes cannot die. Memory, faith, order—those things persist so long as men are willing to live them.

Cat’s gaze shifted to the darkness beyond the lights, where the woods thickened and the night pressed close.

And as long as we remain, Cat replied, his thought burning clean and sharp, the new villainies will not enjoy longevity.

Beauregard settled, confidence restored to its customary calm.

An acceptable result, he said.

On the dock, Bobby Lee and Basil sat without speaking, the animals' conversation utterly inaudible to them, smoke drifting upward, drinks cooling in their hands. Behind them, the house stood firm. Around them, the night held.

And within it all—old loyalties endured, and new evils learned to fear the light.

In all of it—quietly, stubbornly—what was good in God’s creation had not merely survived. It had thrived.

Two men, older now but still unmistakably men, sat in the dusk with the ease of those who had been tested and found sufficient. They loved their women fiercely, not as ornament or habit, but as men were meant to love: with protection, provision, steadiness, and joy in the giving. Their strength was not loud. It did not need to be. It was reliable, which is rarer.

Nearby, a cat kept watch—ruthless, precise, a creature of clean instincts and unblinking judgment. He asked no permission of the night and offered no mercy to what threatened the perimeter. He was what he was, without apology, and the world was safer for it.

At his side, a basset hound lay heavy with contentment, his heart a reservoir of loyal love. He did not scheme or strike. He endured. He held ground. He loved because love was his nature, and that, too, was a form of courage.

And away from the river, away from the lights, two women moved through the Alabama night—one getting ready for bed in Fairhope, the other driving across the Causeway into Mobile. They lived without hurry. Their shoulders were relaxed. Their thoughts were their own. They carried beauty within them because they knew—without doubt—that the men who loved them would bend heaven and earth to give them a world where beauty could be nurtured.

This was not nostalgia.

It was not myth.

It was natural order kept in small, human measure.

It was creation doing what it was designed to do when allowed to breathe.

The river flowed.

The lights held steady.

And somewhere between faith and ferocity, loyalty and love, the good flourished and thrived, quietly alive in the care of those who would not abandon it.

Thursday, January 15, 2026

Stop Thinking Like A Westerner

 ... when trying to understand the Islamic world.

Two data points.

Image

Image
These are Islamic goons patrolling the streets of Shahsavar, Iran.

I read some long-winded analysis of the state of the Rial and why this means doom for the Mullahs, but does it really? If Allah promises you unlimited, fantastic sex in the afterlife in exchange for you fighting for his cause, is the lack of pay going to keep you at home?

How did that work out in Libya or with ISIS?

We keep trying to apply Western macroeconomics and behavioral science to a society that is entirely based on what is essentially a primer for life as a 7th Century desert warlord and his crew. Then we end up surprised that the foreign exchange rate didn't have much of an effect on the zealots.

Things certainly seem bleak for the dudes in black robes and flea-infested beards and I'd really like to see them all whacked, but who knows where this will go even if the Ayatollah buys the farm?


Monday, January 12, 2026

Word Of The Day: Autopoietic

 Autopoietic (from Greek auto, "self," and poiesis, "creation") describes systems, especially living organisms, that continuously produce and maintain themselves by creating and regenerating their own components and boundaries through self-referential processes, essentially meaning they are "self-creating" or "self-making."

A human system that is Autopoietic cannot be changed by outside information. It is impervious to data. Here are four examples.

ONE. The MSM is only obliquely covering the uprisings in Iran.

The Western liberal media is ignoring the Iranian uprising because explaining it would force an admission it is desperate to avoid: the Iranian people are rebelling against Islam itself, and that fact shatters the moral framework through which these institutions understand the world.

Ideally, to cover an uprising is not just to show crowds and slogans. It requires answering a basic question: why are people risking death? In Iran, the answer is simple and unavoidable. The people are rising up because the Islamic Republic of Iran has spent decades suffocating every aspect of life—speech, work, family, art, women, and economic survival—under a clerical system that treats liberty as a crime. There is no way to tell that story without confronting the nature of the regime.

Western media refuses to do so because it has fundamentally misunderstood Islam. Or worse, it has chosen not to understand it.

Islam, in Western progressive discourse, has been racialized. It is treated not as a belief system or a political ideology, but as a stand-in for race or ethnicity. Criticizing Islam is framed as an attack on “brown people,” Arabs, or “the Middle East,” as if Islam were a skin color rather than a doctrine...

By treating Islam as a racial identity rather than an ideology, Western media strips millions of people of their ability to reject it. Iranian protesters become unintelligible. Their rebellion cannot be processed without breaking the rule that Islam must not be criticized. So instead of listening to Iranians, the media speaks over them—or ignores them entirely.

TWO. Europe is completely misreading the moment and its place in the world.

Europe has a serious military problem for which it has no solution: Ukraine. Eager to satisfy Joe Biden, they launched into a rhetorical escalation of support for Zelensky to the end and, logically, of confrontation with the Kremlin, without having the will or ability to deliver on their promises. Without the United States—and Zelensky knows this well—Ukraine is lost. But E.U. leaders keep talking as if they are ready to launch us into World War III, except that they have neither the weapons nor the soldiers to wage it. But instead of seeking a de-escalation in rhetoric and accepting the inevitable, that only Donald Trump could force a peace agreement, however painful it might be for Ukraine, Europe continues to jump on the bandwagon of bellicosity, putting fear into its population and painting apocalyptic scenarios but little else.

THREE. European green energy plans, now well underway, ignored the fragility of the system they were building.

This narrowing of the energy supply down to a single energy carrier (electricity) was called “sector coupling.” This sector coupling was propagated and celebrated by the “Green high priests” as a sustainable model for the future. Originally, it was an attempt to correct the weakness of renewable energies, which lead to unusable surpluses during periods of high wind and solar production. These useless surpluses were intended to be pushed into the heating and vehicle sectors after storage...

(T)he attack in Berlin demonstrates to us that such an energy system, based solely on electricity, is highly vulnerable. We are learning that when the power fails, the heat supply also fails—at least when it is supposed to be generated by heat pumps. And to make matters worse, we are learning that in freezing temperatures, heat pumps face total loss due to bursting pipes.

FOUR. Minnesota's Somali looting shows the systemic failure of self-interested NGOs.

Autopoietic systems lose the capacity for the environment to redefine their purpose. Inputs still arrive, but they are reinterpreted until they are compatible with the system’s existing outputs. Feedback loops close. Contradictions are absorbed. External signals stop producing corrective changes in internal behavior.

At that point, the system is no longer adaptive relative to its original purpose. It becomes self-referential. It is capable of internally justified expansion without reference to external success.

That’s a long-winded way to explain that none of these institutions were lying in the usual sense. They were maintaining equilibrium.

This is the key point: autopoiesis becomes pathological when stability is prioritized over external correction.

The system no longer asks, Is this true?

 It asks, Is this compatible with what we already produce?

Now we tie in Helen Andrews' excellent essay, The Great Feminization. I spent a little time with AI this morning asking it to summarize what was common to all four examples above. Here's what we decided.

The Deeper Unifying Insight

Across all four:

1. Institutions confuse moral posture with competence

Virtue signaling replaces results.

2. Feedback loops close

Bad outcomes do not trigger reform — they trigger narrative adjustment.

3. Dissent is either absorbed or erased

Never allowed to invalidate the system.

4. Stability is prioritized over truth

Even when stability accelerates long-term failure.

5. External reality becomes an enemy

Reality is dangerous because it can falsify internal logic.

That sounds exactly like our diocese' synodal processes and endless support for the "migrants" at the expense of the American "marginalized." The contradiction involved is denied or dismissed. Since our synodal process is deeply and pathologically feminine, fitting into Helen's thesis perfectly, how about these four examples. Do they fit as well?

The Unifying Move Andrews Makes

Andrews explains autopoietic institutional failure as the downstream effect of demographic feminization combined with legal–bureaucratic enforcement of feminine group norms.

In other words:

The systems described earlier did not become self-referential by accident or ideology alone.

They became so because the dominant mode of conflict resolution, truth evaluation, and legitimacy production inside them fundamentally changed.

She identifies the Great Feminization as the force that reoriented institutions away from:

  • truth-seeking
  • adversarial testing
  • rule-bound process
  • outcome-based evaluation

and toward:

  • consensus maintenance
  • emotional validation
  • narrative safety
  • cohesion over correction

That shift is precisely what produces the closed feedback loops you identified earlier.

Bingeaux, as we say on the bayou.

Men and women, male and female, are complimentary. Both are necessary. When only one dominates, you get things like the Germans moving to nothing but electricity, the Minnesotans handing their ATM cards to the Somalis and delusions about European militaries and Iranian uprisings.

To borrow from an old post of mine ...

Does God have a plan, a template, an objective moral structure for sex or not? If not, why not? How did He manage to overlook our strongest evolutionary motivating force?

If He does have an objective moral structure for sex, why is it different than what JPII laid out in Theology of the Body?

Image
BOOM.
"I'll just leave this little pamphlet here. You may read it at your leisure ..."

Theology of the Body is about more than just the horizontal monkey dance. It's also about our need for the mental and emotional outlook provided by the other sex. Remove one or the other and you end up with a real mess, one which cannot self-correct.

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Minneapolis Hubris

 This photo perfectly captures the modern AWFL*.

Image

I've seen that same facial expression in a couple of women on our Parish Synod team. They're the ones going on at length about the migrants and about how our parish is insulated from the real world, read: we're too white.

If you don't know, that's the AWFL what took a bullet to the dome the other day while doing stupid things with her car around Federal law enforcement officers. She's the very model of the Greek tragedy concept of hubris. AI defines that as follows:

In Greek tragedy, what comes before nemesis is hubris.

The classic moral sequence is:

Hubris → Atē → Nemesis

Here’s how it works:

Hubris (ὕβρις)

Arrogance, pride, or overreaching—especially toward the gods or the moral order. The hero believes he is above limits, law, or fate.

Atē (ἄτη) (often implicit)

A state of delusion or moral blindness sent by the gods. Because of hubris, the character can no longer see clearly and makes disastrous choices.

Nemesis (νέμεσις)

Retribution or divine justice. Not mere revenge, but the restoration of balance through punishment.

In short:

Hubris blinds → Atē misleads → Nemesis restores order

I think that's a good summation for what happens to AWFLs when they try to translate their devouring mother tendencies into the real world.

Adam Carolla said it much more bluntly here.

* - AWFL: Affluent, White, Female Liberal

Friday, January 09, 2026

Playing The Lotto In Tehran And Minneapolis

What comes next after this?

How about after this?

In California, or should I say Delaware, one of the original founders of Google is leaving California before the "Billionaire's Tax" hits him.

When the lottery jackpot gets above $1B, we usually play. We buy 20 tickets which amounts to $40. It typically takes about 3-4 drawings for the jackpot to be hit, so we blow $120 - $160 on that silliness. It's OK if you can afford to set fire to $160, which we can. If we had credit card debt and car payments and student loans, it wouldn't be innocent fun, it would be stupid.

Iran's inflation rate is around 50%. Mostly Nothing would tell you that good, hardworking people are leaving Minneapolis, not going there. California's exodus is well-known.

Even if the Mullahs put down the revolt, the mood of the labor force will be dark and the damage to the nation's fixed assets will be significant. Even if ICE is chased out of Minneapolis, the mood of citizens with portable skills and wealth will be more pessimistic. Smart people in California openly talk about exit strategies. For the authorities in each locale, this is playing the Lotto on a grand scale when you're in deep financial trouble, where the payoff is the achievement of a progressive utopia with about the same odds of success.

I can imagine NYC is the same way right about now.

What's the end product of all of this? TJ slums for everyone?

Image
Winning?

Monday, January 05, 2026

You Can't Make Generalizations

 ... except when you can.

No one would suggest that you would want to mix Nazis and Jews. No one would suggest you would want to mix Aztecs and Conquistadors. You wouldn't want to mix Klansmen and black children, either.

If it happened in the sufficiently distant past and we've been acculturated to picking out the good guys from the bad guys in the group dynamics, then making generalizations about people is not only allowable, it's desirable. Only airheads like Nick Fuentes would make positive noises about the Nazis. Only unredeemed racists would say good things about the Klan.

We can admit that some groups should not mix, but only if it involves people who are no longer alive or at least no longer present in significant numbers.

If it happened in the past, why isn't it happening now? If we all agree that in the distant past, there were groups that oppressed, exploited or simply parasitized others, what about today? Where was the line drawn and who drew it putting an end to such things?

Beats me.

Image
After being exposed for pervasive fraud schemes of all sorts, some of the Minneapolis Somalis decided to show Jussie Smollett just how this low-IQ hoax thing was done.

Bonus Data Point

Dig this.

"Somalia’s Ambassador to the UN Abukar Dahir Osman was a healthcare administrator in Ohio. There is another healthcare company in the SAME SUITE as his with a different name, and multiple others at the same address, all with Somali names."

Image

You can't blame a homeboy for wanting a piece of the action, can you?

Nothing to see here, No generalizations to be made. Please move along, citizens...

Swedish Update

Sweden, in their ultra-feminine empathy, took in a ton of Syrians, Ethiopians and Somalis over the last 10 years. Sweden has always been known for meatballs, herring, Pippi Longstocking and snow. You can now add hand grenade attacks to that list, but be sure not to make any generalizations about the "migrants."