Ken Brown replies to critics
http://www.adti.net/samizdat/brown.reply.june.04.html
I can't say this is much of a reply. He basically tries to restate his false claims. I really found it enjoyable in an amusing way.
Even in this reply he just uses a whole lot of FUD. This 'hybrid source' crap is amusing. What does it have to do with Linux? Linux doesn't have proprietary code.
All in all it's not very surprising. Brown basically blows all the claims by saying that everyone that objected is a "rabid pro-linux developer".
Just thought I'd share it. Hope you guys find it as amusing as I did. I would love to see someone string together a copy of this with footnotes of the people quoted saying how they are being taken out of context, or other random facts.
I can't say this is much of a reply. He basically tries to restate his false claims. I really found it enjoyable in an amusing way.
Even in this reply he just uses a whole lot of FUD. This 'hybrid source' crap is amusing. What does it have to do with Linux? Linux doesn't have proprietary code.
All in all it's not very surprising. Brown basically blows all the claims by saying that everyone that objected is a "rabid pro-linux developer".
Just thought I'd share it. Hope you guys find it as amusing as I did. I would love to see someone string together a copy of this with footnotes of the people quoted saying how they are being taken out of context, or other random facts.
