onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
glenn greenwald on another fine rant (in september 2021) about journalists and sources of leaked material


https://piped.kavin.rocks/watch?v=I31O5_X4P1Y&t=2705



the questions, if you're in a rush


  1. is it accurate?

  2. is it in the public interest to know?



if the answers to both are yes, publish.


for context, see this previous entry.
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
the social media true crime genre in its frenzy to unmask the leaker of the cctv footage in the idaho (or idaho4) case, is emulating the absolute worst of mainstream media, 'journalists' who may not even be journalists so much as domestic spies.

for context, see this previous entry.

this is glenn greenwald's system update show from 13th april 2023, discussing mainstream media's inappropriate zeal to unmask the leaker of the ukraine files, jack teixeira. they succeeding in finding and outing him, and in doing law enforcement's and the intelligence agencies' job instead of their own. journalism is an adversarial sort of job. not everyone is cut out for it. which brings me back to the points i was making and the questions i was asking in this entry.


onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
on the crucial importance of sources, and how sound journalistic ethics are the keys to freedom of the press.

again, i encourage reading the whole article. and for context, see this previous entry.


https://ethicaljournalismnetwork.org/protecting-sources-keep-journalism-alive

4TH DECEMBER 2019

Protecting the Sources Who Keep Journalism Alive
Aidan White


Journalists can’t be everywhere to witness these events for themselves, so they rely on others to provide them with the facts, eye-witness testimony and insider secrets they need to tell their stories.

These are our sources of information. They are the lifeblood of quality journalism. Reporters may be stylish writers or polished presenters, but what counts most to the public is the reliability of the stories they tell, and that depends on the quality of our sources.Read more... )
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
again, these are international issues. is the internet still a new frontier or part of the international community?

also, note these questions apply to specific circumstances: before using a source's material and when a court's trying to compel a journo to give a up their source. still, they may be very useful to ask oneself in social media scenarios. for context, see this previous entry.


https://ethicaljournalismnetwork.org/handling-sources

ETHICAL GROUND RULES FOR HANDLING SOURCES
Aidan White

Protection of sources is well recognised in international law as a key principle underpinning press freedom. It has been specifically recognised by the United Nations and the Council of Europe.

Journalists and news media should establish guidelines and internal rules that help protect sources. Read more... )
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
from an international perspective. again, people around the world are on high alert over these issues, and people in the social media true crime genre are... woefully out of step with everyone who cares.

there's also a lot in this article about the greater risks (due to surveillance tech) placed on female journalists, female whistleblowers, and female confidential or anonymous sources. i think we can agree they also exist when you're not even bothering to use any secure tech and are eagerly, publicly outing sources and leakers. i recommend following the link below to read (at least) that section in full. and for context, see this previous entry.


https://www.mediadefence.org/ereader/publications/advanced-modules-on-digital-rights-and-freedom-of-expression-online/module-4-privacy-and-security-online/source-protection-and-the-protection-of-journalistic-materials/

Media Defence provides legal help to journalists, citizen journalists and independent media across the world.


The confidentiality of journalistic sources is central to journalists’ ability to properly investigate stories, and to the protection of individuals and whistleblowers who provide information to them.(1) Efforts to compel the disclosure of sources have a chilling effect on freedom of speech and media freedom and hinder the free flow of information.(2)

In this regard, General Comment No. 34 to the ICCPR provides that states parties “should recognise and respect that element of the right of freedom of expression that embraces the limited journalistic privilege not to disclose sources.” Furthermore, the Africa Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights issued the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression in Africa in 2019, which deals with the issue of protection of sources by providing as follows:

“Journalists and other media practitioners shall not be required to reveal confidential sources of information or to disclose other material held for journalistic purposes except where disclosure has been ordered by a court after a full and fair public hearing.”(3)

The Declaration emphasises that this should only take place where the identity of the source is necessary for the investigation or prosecution of a serious crime, where the information can’t be obtained from elsewhere, and whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to freedom of expression.

It is important to note that the protection of sources has acquired new significance in the digital age in the context of the right to privacy of communications as surveillance technologies whose development is justified in terms of national security can be used to target journalists and their confidential sources
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
https://thenewsmanual.net/Manuals Volume 3/bonus_fake-news_and_trust_chains.html

If you know the source of an important item of questionable or contested information – not simply who has repeated or retweeted it – ask yourself:

What have they got to gain by saying it?
What have they got to lose?
Generally speaking, if someone has a lot to gain personally and little to lose from their statement, they should be examined more critically than someone who has a lot to lose and little to gain by stating something as fact.


&


https://thenewsmanual.net/Manuals Volume 3/volume3_59.htm

There are also legal dangers to consider when using leaked documents. They might, for instance, have been stolen. It is usually an offence to receive stolen property if you think it could have been stolen, even if it is only a few sheets of paper. As we explain in the chapters on investigative reporting, photocopying the document then returning it is often a way to overcome this problem.

Leaked documents could also be covered by copyright, so you could be breaking the law by quoting directly from them. You are on safer ground in reporting the substance of what was said, in your own words. (For more details on copyright, see Chapter 63: Introduction to the law.)


for context, see this previous entry.
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
info about source protection and reporter's privilege and shield laws (state by state) - from usa perspective. i'll be posting a few reminders of the magnitude of the efforts of people around the world in recent years to maintain or increase protection for journalists and their sources. while people on yt and social media are acting a fool...


(hint: if you're on social media, maybe sometimes, you shouldn't know exactly who the sources are. especially if they were someone else's source and you're doing secondhand feeding off the material. for context, see this previous entry.)


https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1104/confidential-sources

THE FIRST AMENDMENT ENCYCLOPEDIA
PRESENTED BY THE JOHN SEIGENTHALER CHAIR OF EXCELLENCE IN FIRST AMENDMENT STUDIES

Confidential Sources
By Audrey Perry (Updated 2020)

Many states have enacted reporter shield laws to allow confidential sources

More than 30 state legislatures have enacted shield laws to provide reporters some type of privilege against the compelled production of confidential information. State shield laws usually are of limited scope and structure and protect only certain journalists or types of information from being revealed.

Freelancers and bloggers are often not included in the definition of a journalist and therefore have not been granted the privilege. Many laws include broad exceptions for certain types of information, for example, when it’s applicable to criminal defense cases. In 1970 in the federal arena, the Department of Justice provided journalists an additional safeguard against being forced to disclose information in court by requiring the approval of the attorney general for department officials to subpoena reporters.


Efforts to pass a national shield law continue

The issue of confidential sources will likely come under increased scrutiny in the future, as more people become involved in news gathering as a result of the ease of distribution via the Internet.
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
the first article excerpted below is very good. i recommend reading it in full. there's also a definition of investigative journalism at the beginning of it. to me, what goes on in social media doesn't merit the term - especially since hearing a few of them declare (i.e., lie) recently that they aren't trying to solve or figure out the cases - but make up your own mind. it's still my opinion that a lot if not all of these principles should be applied by people active in that genre.

basically, everything said here (in both articles) is being contravened by those in the youtube true crime genre the last couple of weeks, in their mania to out the source of leaked cctv footage in the idaho (or idaho4) case. the steps to do with vetting material and sources seemingly weren't even thought about until after everyone made use of the footage for their own content. they seem eager to cause legal problems for the leaker, but may end up causing them for themselves and each other. (a level of thoughtlessness and stupidity - or underhandedness - flagrantly displayed by another recent newcomer to the genre & the idaho case on yt which was discussed in frank terms by some, but not enough. there was also another incident where one channel attempted to doxx a sort of background source (i.e., someone adjacent to the case). most people were appalled by that, yet the broader lessons from these two incidents apparently were not learned. the difference between an instinctive sense of right and wrong vs. purposefully learning about the ethics that apply to the situations you're placing yourself in?)

for more context, see this previous entry.



https://cpijournalism.org/investigative-source-protection/
The Center for Public Interest Journalism: Created to improve the quantity and quality of public interest news and information in the Greater Philadelphia area.


How Do Journalists Protect Their Sources And Maintain Confidentiality In Investigative Reporting?
By
Delbert
January 3, 2023


C. Overview of the Legal Implications of Not Protecting Sources
Without proper protection of sources, journalists can find themselves in hot water with the law. This is because when a source has provided information to a journalist, the journalist has a duty of confidentiality to protect the source’s identity.

If a journalist discloses the identity of a source without their authorization or consent, the source may have legal recourse.Read more... )</>
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
sharing excerpts from resources on ethics in journalism which would be of use to the social media true crime genre, if applied.


https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp
SPJ Code of Ethics
Revised September 6, 2014 at 4:49 p.m. CT at SPJ’s National Convention in Nashville, Tenn.
SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS


Ethical journalism strives to ensure the free exchange of information that is accurate, fair and thorough. An ethical journalist acts with integrity.

The Society declares these four principles as the foundation of ethical journalism and encourages their use in its practice by all people in all media. Read more... )
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
still exploring the often inadvertent nexus between private investigation and independent journalism in the true crime niche on social media (particularly youtube), and what ethics content creators ought to adopt to govern themselves as individuals.

for more context, see this earlier post.

i wanted to share this info, in hopes it might be helpful, about private investigator ethics.


"Just as here is a code of ethics imposed on investigators who are members of official agencies, there should be a code of ethics or ethical standards of conduct imposed on all other investigators who function outside the investigative framework of the official agencies.Read more... )
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
i used to think people interested in true crime (as in, mostly infamous past crimes and criminals) were simply morbid, creepy and perhaps sick and disturbed.

later on, when i noticed some were also into cold cases or cases of wrongful conviction, i thought perhaps they were people who were interested in solving mysteries Read more... )

Poll #29632 authoritarians in true crime
This poll is anonymous.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: Just the Poll Creator, participants: 0

are authoritarian people capable of meaningfully 'double checking' law enforcement investigations?

yes
0 (0.0%)

no
0 (0.0%)

are authoritarian people capable of accurate investigative work, in general?

yes
0 (0.0%)

no
0 (0.0%)

should more undogmatic people participate in the true crime genre online?

yes, it would improve if they did
0 (0.0%)

no, it wouldn't make any difference
0 (0.0%)

onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
the internet has its own organic way of doing things. sometimes the approach seems - or, is - lighthearted, or even sarcastic & cynical, at first. but great and highly effective things can grow out of such beginnings.

back in the day, for instance, anonymous Read more... ) i'm going to be posting info here for a bit about journalism ethics and protection of sources and - as a bonus - private investigator ethics as well. who knows? maybe someone thinking of starting a yt channel, or who already has one, will wander by and be helped by it. or maybe it'll just serve as a reminder, to myself and any others, on how to make better choices about whom to watch and whom to ignore online.Read more... )
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
journalism
jûr′nə-lĭz″əm
noun

The collecting, writing, editing, and presenting of news or news articles.

Material written for publication or broadcast as news.

The business of a journalist; the occupation of writing for, editing, or producing a newspaper or public journal; the diffusion of intelligence or of opinions by means of journals or newspapers and periodicals.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.



Poll #29627 true crime youtube content pt 2
This poll is anonymous.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: Just the Poll Creator, participants: 0

do you consider true crime youtubers (or elsewhere online) to be

engaging in journalism
0 (0.0%)

just people, publicly discussing the news
0 (0.0%)

amateur investigators
0 (0.0%)

do you think true crime youtubers (or elsewhere online) consider themselves to be

engaging in journalism
0 (0.0%)

just people, publicly discussing the news
0 (0.0%)

amateur investigators
0 (0.0%)

do you prefer the true crime youtubers (or elsewhere online) whom you watch to be

engaging in journalism
0 (0.0%)

just people, publicly discussing the news
0 (0.0%)

amateur investigators
0 (0.0%)

onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
some info about the genre of true crime and its history:
https://www.studysmarter.us/explanations/english-literature/literary-devices/true-crime/

for whatever reason, i could only add 2 questions to the poll, so there may be more of these.


Poll #29626 true crime youtube content (part 1)
This poll is anonymous.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: Just the Poll Creator, participants: 0

if you watch true crime content online, do you consider yourself to be

interested in true crime as a genre
0 (0.0%)

just following the news
0 (0.0%)

in your opinion, is the true crime sector on youtube/online

a genre
0 (0.0%)

a community
0 (0.0%)

onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
good interview with a journo, from a few months back, about the state of modern media and social media.
https://piped.kavin.rocks/watch?v=px_6s0AO3Dw

someone in the (alleged) 'true crime community' on yt, talked to an old school journalist from idaho.

exceeded expectations. 👍
onymous: grey userhead icon (Default)
glad to see all the invite codes found their futures. welcome!

not sure what i'll be using this space for, or how long it will take me to get it going, so i won't be offended if anyone unsubscribes. (actually, i won't ever be offended if anyone ever unsubscribes. lol do what you want.)
Page generated Feb. 23rd, 2026 06:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios