A.I. programming in Prolog and Assembler

September 25, 2025

DeepSeek on implementing classic Prolog Unification (of variables) encoded in bits

I asked DeepSeek: “How can we implement classic Prolog-unification (of variables) encoded in bits?”

Image

ANSWER: Implementing classic Prolog unification using bit-encoded data is an interesting challenge that combines symbolic reasoning with low-level bit manipulation. Unification in Prolog is the process of matching two terms by finding a substitution for variables that makes the terms identical. To implement this using bit-encoded data, we need to:

  1. Encode terms and variables in bits.
  2. Define bitwise operations to perform unification.
  3. Handle backtracking and variable substitutions.

Below is a step-by-step explanation of how this can be achieved:

1. Encoding Terms and Variables in Bits

  • Variables: Represent each variable as a unique bit pattern. For example:
    • X could be 0b0001.
    • Y could be 0b0010.
  • Constants: Represent constants (e.g., atoms, numbers) as distinct bit patterns.
    • For example, apple could be 0b1000.
  • Compound Terms: Encode compound terms (e.g., f(a, b)) using a combination of function symbols and arguments.
    • For example, f(a, b) could be represented as 0b1010 1000 1001, where:
      • 0b1010 is the function symbol f.
      • 0b1000 is the constant a.
      • 0b1001 is the constant b.

2. Bitwise Unification Algorithm

Unification involves recursively matching two terms and ensuring they can be made identical by substituting variables. Here’s how to implement it using bitwise operations:

Step 1: Check if the terms are identical.

  • If the bit patterns of the two terms are the same, unification succeeds.
  • Example:

term1 = 0b1000 # a
term2 = 0b1000 # a
if term1 == term2:
print("Unification succeeds")

Step 2: Handle variables.

  • If one of the terms is a variable, assign the other term to it.
  • Example:

X = 0b0001 # Variable X
term = 0b1000 # Constant a
substitution = {X: term} # Unify X with a

Step 3: Recursively unify compound terms.

  • For compound terms, unify the function symbols and then recursively unify the arguments.
  • Example:
def unify(term1, term2, substitution):
 if term1 == term2: return substitution
 if is_variable(term1): return {substitution, term1: term2}
 if is_variable(term2): return {substitution, term2: term1}
 if is_compound(term1) and is_compound(term2):
        if get_function_symbol(term1) != get_function_symbol(term2):
           return None # Unification fails
    for arg1, arg2 in zip(get_arguments(term1), get_arguments(term2)):
        substitution = unify(arg1, arg2, substitution)
        if substitution is None: return None
    return substitution 
 return None # Unification fails

3. Handling Backtracking

  • Prolog uses backtracking to explore alternative solutions. To implement this with bit-encoded data:
    • Maintain a stack of substitutions.
    • When unification fails, pop the stack and try the next possible substitution.
  • Example:

def backtrack(unification_stack):
while unification_stack:
substitution = unification_stack.pop()
# Try the next possible unification
result = unify(term1, term2, substitution)

if result is not None:
return result
return None # No more solutions

4. Example: Unification in Action

Let’s unify the terms f(X, a) and f(b, Y):

  • Encode the terms:
    • f(X, a) → 0b1010 0001 1000
    • f(b, Y) → 0b1010 1001 0010
  • Perform unification:
    • Unify the function symbols (0b1010 == 0b1010).
    • Unify the first arguments (X and b):
      • Assign X = b (0b0001 = 0b1001).
    • Unify the second arguments (a and Y):
      • Assign Y = a (0b0010 = 0b1000).
  • Resulting substitution: {X: 0b1001, Y: 0b1000}

5. Challenges and Considerations

  • Bit Width: Ensure the bit patterns are wide enough to represent all variables, constants, and function symbols.
  • Efficiency: Bitwise operations are fast, but recursive unification and backtracking can be computationally expensive for large terms.
  • Complexity: Handling nested compound terms and cyclic structures requires careful implementation.

6. Applications

  • Symbolic AI: Implement Prolog-like reasoning in low-level systems.
  • Hardware Acceleration: Use bitwise operations for efficient unification in hardware.
  • Embedded Systems: Perform logical inference in resource-constrained environments.

By encoding terms and variables in bits and using bitwise operations, you can implement a form of Prolog unification that is efficient and suitable for low-level programming. This approach bridges the gap between symbolic reasoning and bit-level manipulation, enabling new possibilities for AI and logic programming.

——————— (END of DeepSeek’s Answer) ———————

See also:

DeepSeek on how to make logical inferences using bit-encoded data

I asked DeepSeek:Is there a way to make logical inferences using bit-encoded data?

Image

DeepSeek answered:

Yes, it is possible to make logical inferences using bit-encoded data. Bit-encoded data represents information in binary form (0s and 1s), and logical operations can be performed on this data to derive new information or make inferences. Here’s how you can approach it:

1. Logical Operations on Bits

  • AND (&): Returns 1 if both bits are 1, otherwise 0.
  • OR (|): Returns 1 if at least one bit is 1, otherwise 0.
  • XOR (^): Returns 1 if the bits are different, otherwise 0.
  • NOT (~): Flips the bit (1 becomes 0, and 0 becomes 1).
  • Shift Operations (<<>>): Shift bits left or right.

These operations can be used to manipulate and analyze bit-encoded data.

2. Bitwise Logical Inference

  • If you encode logical propositions as bits (e.g., A = 1B = 0), you can use bitwise operations to perform logical inference.
  • For example:
    • A AND B can be computed as A & B.
    • A OR B can be computed as A | B.
    • NOT A can be computed as ~A (though be cautious with the bit width).

3. Encoding Data for Logical Inference

  • You can encode multiple logical variables into a single integer by assigning each variable to a specific bit position.
  • For example:
    • Let A be the 0th bit, B be the 1st bit, and C be the 2nd bit.
    • The integer 5 (binary 101) would represent A = 1B = 0C = 1.

4. Example: Logical Inference

Suppose you have the following rules:

  • If A is true and B is false, then C is true.
  • Encode AB, and C as bits in an integer.

You can implement this inference using bitwise operations:

In Python:

data = 0b101 # A=1, B=0, C=1
A = (data >> 0) & 1 # Extract bit 0 (A)
B = (data >> 1) & 1 # Extract bit 1 (B)
C = (data >> 2) & 1 # Extract bit 2 (C)

if A == 1 and B == 0:
C = 1
data = (data & ~0b100) | (C << 2) # Update C in the data

print(bin(data)) # Output: 0b101 (C remains 1)

5. Applications

  • Boolean Algebra: Solve logical expressions using bitwise operations.
  • Rule-Based Systems: Encode rules and perform inference on bit-encoded data.
  • Compression: Represent multiple boolean values compactly using bits.
  • Hardware-Level Logic: Simulate digital circuits using bitwise operations.

6. Limitations

  • Bitwise operations are limited to the number of bits in the data type (e.g., 32 or 64 bits).
  • Complex logical inferences may require multiple steps or additional encoding schemes.

By leveraging bitwise operations, you can efficiently perform logical inferences on bit-encoded data, making it a powerful tool for low-level programming and optimization.

——————— (END of DeepSeek’s Answer) ———————

My comment:
Since a long time ago, I’ve been using bit-encoding for a wide variety of tasks, implemented in Pure Assembly Language, callable as predicates for Prolog or as functions for ‘C’ / C++, including code for logical inferences, but I never implemented Prolog Unification using bit-encoding, till now. Well, amazingly enough, DeepSeek also explained how to implement classic Prolog Unification (of variables) encoded in bits

See also:

April 5, 2025

Prolog vs LLMs: A Complementary Approach to AI (according to DeepSeek)

Filed under: DeepSeek, LLMs, programming, Prolog — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Omadeon @ 7:51 am

I asked DeepSeek: «Can the computer language PROLOG remain useful in today’s LLM-based A.I.?»

Here is DeepSeek’s answer:

Image

Yes, Prolog can still remain useful in today’s AI landscape, even with the rise of large language models (LLMs) like GPT, Gemini, and others. While LLMs excel at natural language understanding, generation, and pattern recognition, Prolog offers unique strengths in symbolic reasoning, rule-based systems, and logical inference. Here’s how Prolog can complement LLM-based AI:

  1. Strengths of Prolog in AI
    Symbolic Reasoning: Prolog is designed for symbolic manipulation and logical inference, making it ideal for tasks requiring precise reasoning, such as theorem proving, expert systems, and knowledge representation.

Rule-Based Systems: Prolog’s declarative nature allows developers to define rules and relationships clearly, which is useful for encoding domain-specific knowledge (e.g., medical diagnosis, legal reasoning).

Backtracking and Search: Prolog’s built-in backtracking mechanism is powerful for solving combinatorial problems, such as scheduling, planning, and constraint satisfaction.

Transparency and Explainability: Prolog programs are inherently interpretable, making it easier to trace and explain decisions compared to the “black-box” nature of LLMs.

  1. Complementing LLMs
    LLMs are excellent at handling unstructured data (e.g., text, images) and generating human-like responses, but they often struggle with:

Logical Consistency: LLMs can produce plausible but incorrect or inconsistent answers.

Precise Reasoning: Tasks requiring strict logical inference (e.g., mathematical proofs, symbolic logic) are better handled by Prolog.

Domain-Specific Knowledge: Prolog can encode structured knowledge bases that LLMs can query or use for grounding.

Hybrid Approaches:

Use LLMs for natural language understanding and generation, and Prolog for logical reasoning and rule-based decision-making.

For example, an LLM could parse a user’s query into a structured format (e.g., a logical statement), which Prolog then evaluates to produce a precise answer.

  1. Use Cases for Prolog in Modern AI
    Expert Systems: Prolog can power expert systems in domains like healthcare, finance, and law, where precise rule-based reasoning is critical.

Knowledge Graphs: Prolog can query and reason over knowledge graphs, enabling complex inferences that LLMs alone cannot perform.

Formal Verification: Prolog is useful for verifying the correctness of systems, such as software or hardware designs, using logical rules.

Education: Prolog is still widely used in teaching logic, AI, and computational thinking due to its simplicity and clarity.

Chatbots and Assistants: Prolog can handle structured, rule-based interactions (e.g., answering FAQs, processing forms), while LLMs manage free-form conversations.

  1. Challenges and Limitations
    Scalability: Prolog struggles with large-scale data and computationally intensive tasks, which are better suited for neural networks or statistical methods.

Integration with Modern Tools: Prolog is not as widely used as Python or other mainstream languages, so integrating it into modern AI pipelines may require additional effort.

Learning Curve: Prolog’s declarative paradigm can be challenging for developers accustomed to imperative or object-oriented programming.

  1. Future of Prolog in AI
    Symbolic-Neural Integration: There is growing interest in combining symbolic AI (e.g., Prolog) with neural networks (e.g., LLMs) to create hybrid systems that leverage the strengths of both approaches.

Explainable AI (XAI): Prolog’s transparency makes it a valuable tool for building explainable AI systems, which are increasingly important in regulated industries.

Niche Applications: Prolog will continue to thrive in domains where symbolic reasoning and rule-based systems are essential.

Conclusion:

Prolog remains a valuable tool in the AI toolkit, especially for tasks requiring logical reasoning, rule-based systems, and explainability. While LLMs dominate areas like natural language processing, Prolog’s strengths in symbolic AI make it a natural complement to modern AI systems. By combining Prolog with LLMs, developers can build more robust, interpretable, and capable AI systems.

_____________________________________________

NOTES:

DeepSeek is the Chinese alternative to western A.I. chatbots such as ChatGPT; much cheaper to train, typically with more intelligent answers, etc.:

Image

October 14, 2007

DreamProver: A visual theorem prover for “Multiple Form Logic” (etc.) in LPA Win-Prolog 4.6

Chart showing the stages in the software relea...Image via Wikipedia

Visual DreamProver 1.0 is a new theorem-proving program, developed in LPA Win-Prolog 4.6, with multi-coloured graphics displays of (potentially unlimited) Logic expressions, theorem proofs and deductions in Multiple Form Logic, in the primary algebra of “Laws of Form“, in Boolean Algebra and in a variety of other logic systems (to a large extent used-defined). Here is an animated GIF slide-show of DreamProver’s visual display. It offers unlimited control of size, colour, shape and content for all Logic Expressions and all theorem proofs:

dreamprover430x.gif

(Click on this image for a better quality animated GIF, of size 450Kb)

Although DreamProver is still at the “alpha stage“, I decided to publish a preliminary first report about its features and capabilities, to a large extent already working, to a lesser extent requiring minor debugging and final extensions, before release. I am also doing this for the benefit (and amusement) of a friendly innovative company: “Logic Programming Associates Ltd”, where I worked for a short pleasant period of a few weeks, some years ago (in 2001). LPA are the creators of the LPA Win-Prolog compiler. I hope that LPA continues a long tradition of innovative success through the latest version of their compiler, which also has MIDI (music) programming capabilities (featured in a recent posting, here).

I am also… officially requesting, after the release of DreamProver (and the ensuing free promotion of LPA’s amazing compiler) a small… personal favour: -A legitimate free copy of their newest LPA Win-Prolog 4.7 compiler! 🙂 (as my license for using version 4.6 ends on the last day of 2007).

DreamProver is particularly suited for the display of so-called “Boundary Logic Systems” (first created by George Spencer Brown in “Laws of Form” and then extended by various people in various ways – including my own “Multiple Form Logic” system). However, its (almost unlimited) potential allows the display of many other logic systems, including Parse-Trees of used-defined grammars, since both the shapes and the data-structures they represent can be redefined “on the fly”. In the display shown above, only a small example of a logic expression is used, mainly to demonstrate graphics capabilities. However, if -for example- the Grammar of a subset of English is used, instead of a Logic Expression, the ensuing graphic display of coloured shapes resembles a tree which is symmetric with respect to a “horizon” line in the middle.

The data-structure for this unusual kind of tree-representation is relatively simple, straight-forward and documented (in the final release of DreamProver). It is separate from the internal Logic representation but related to it through specific user-defined rules: Both the “productions” and the “leaves” of such a grammar tree are user-defined in shape and content. The only difference between other kinds of systems and those built-in (as regards the current first version of DreamProver) is that the other systems do not include internal Proof Algorithms and automated deductions, and can only be fed from the results of such processes (through external third-party software). Before final release it is hoped that the input-expressions in other systems are expressed in standard XML, so as to make the software useful to almost any researcher or developer, in any topic that includes parsed tree-expressions. The ultimate goal is also to develop a kind of Universal DreamProver library, available under a professional license to developers for a small fee (that might help sustain this work and pay for the effort of future upgrades). However, the current version of DreamProver is likely to appear as Open Source in the near future. Keep in touch!

Zemanta Pixie

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started