random: (Default)
Inspired by M's challenge to acknowledge the shameless pop you unironically love, and by watching and discussing Bowie videos, I ended up putting together a video mix tape of shameless pop with massively surreal videos.




Trigger warnings: Contains sexual violence, rape culture, orientalism and straight-out racism, fetishization of the "exotic," body dysmorphia and horror, and really ridiculous symbolism. In other words, they're pop music videos.

Full track list:
random: (Default)
Because of scheduling constraints, we've got three tickets for the Folk Festival for Thursday that I'm not sure we're going to use.  Hawskley Worksman and Bruce Hornsby are headlining tomorrow night.  If you want them, let me know.  If you can offer us some money, that would be awesome, but we'd rather people we like get to see music than that they sit unused so speak up anyways.
random: (Default)
 Back from Kaleidoscope.  Not even trying to catch up on the online world.  If something's happened in the last two weeks that I should know about, drop me an email or message me.
random: (Spider)
Courtesy of our friends at Avaaz (direct link to the petition without their intro)

In days, we could finally see the beginning of the end of the ‘war on drugs’. This expensive war has completely failed to curb the plague of drug addiction, while costing countless lives, devastating communities, and funneling trillions of dollars into violent organized crime networks.

Experts all agree that the most sensible policy is to regulate, but politicians are afraid to touch the issue. In days, a global commission including former heads of state and foreign policy chiefs of the UN, EU, US, Brazil, Mexico and more will break the taboo and publicly call for new approaches including decriminalization and regulation of drugs.

This could be a once-in-a-generation tipping-point moment -- if enough of us call for an end to this madness. Politicians say they understand that the war on drugs has failed, but claim the public isn't ready for an alternative. Let's show them we not only accept a sane and humane policy -- we demand it. Sign the petition and share with everyone --if we reach 1 million voices, it will be personally delivered to world leaders by the global commission.

For 50 years current drug policies have failed everyone, everywhere but public debate is stuck in the mud of fear and misinformation. Everyone, even the UN Office on Drugs and Crime which is responsible for enforcing this approach agrees -- deploying militaries and police to burn drug farms, hunting down traffickers, and imprisoning dealers and addicts – is an expensive mistake. And with massive human cost -- from Afghanistan, to Mexico, to the USA the illegal drug trade is destroying countries around the world, while addiction, overdose deaths, and HIV/AIDS infections continue to rise.

Meanwhile, countries with less-harsh enforcement -- like Switzerland, Portugal, the Netherlands, and Australia -- have not seen the explosion in drug use that proponents of the drug war have darkly predicted. Instead, they have seen significant reductions in drug-related crime, addiction and deaths, and are able to focus squarely on dismantling criminal empires.

Powerful lobbies still stand in the way of change, including military, law enforcement, and prison departments whose budgets are at stake. And politicians fear that voters will throw them out of office if they support alternative approaches, as they will appear weak on law and order. But many former drug Ministers and Heads of State have come out in favour of reform since leaving office, and polls show that citizens across the world know the current approach is a catastrophe. Momentum is gathering towards new improved policies, particularly in regions that are ravaged by the drug trade.

If we can create a worldwide outcry in the next few days to support the bold calls of the Global Commission on Drug Policy, we can overpower the stale excuses for the status quo. Our voices hold the key to change -- Sign the petition and spread the word.

We have a chance to enter the closing chapter of this brutal 'war' that has destroyed millions of lives. Global public opinion will determine if this catastrophic policy is stopped or if politicians shy away from reform. Let's rally urgently to push our hesitating leaders from doubt and fear, over the edge, and into reason.

random: (Default)
Hey, all -

For those of you who don't know, I'm running of for two weeks in the desert, much of which I'll be spending backpacking and camping in the interior of the Grand Canyon.

I'm going to be completely out of radio contact from Wednesday until about Thursday the week after, and very sporadically online in the couple days on either side of that. 

I'll see you all when I get back.  I'm sure the Internets will somehow manage to survive without me.
random: (Default)
OK Cupid, the source of all knowledge, tells me that these three questions are the most likely to predict successful relationships. So, INTERNETS, REVEAL ALL TO ME:

Poll #6011 Important Questions
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: Just the Poll Creator, participants: 72

Do you like horror movies?

Yes, they're amazing.
5 (6.9%)

Yes, they provide an Aristotelian experience of catharsis.
8 (11.1%)

It depends whether they focus on gruesome fear of the unknown, or explore the depths of human psychology.
29 (40.3%)

No, I don't much like movies.
9 (12.5%)

No, I find them depressing and there's too much darkness already in the world.
13 (18.1%)

No, I find them scary.
31 (43.1%)

No, I find them boring.
13 (18.1%)

Ticky Box
23 (31.9%)

Have you ever traveled around another country alone?

Yes, as often as I can
7 (9.7%)

Yes, and I enjoyed it
42 (58.3%)

Yes, but I found it lonely and isolated
8 (11.1%)

No, but I'd like to
21 (29.2%)

No, and I'm not particularly interested in doing so
6 (8.3%)

Ticky Box
14 (19.4%)

Wouldn't it be fun to chuck it all and go live on a sailboat?

Yes, of course
26 (36.1%)

Only if I got to fly a skull and crossbones
23 (31.9%)

Swallows and Amazons FOREVER!
17 (23.6%)

No, I'd prefer a narrowboat
4 (5.6%)

No
28 (38.9%)

random: (anime)
Everyone's already done their lists, but here's my albums that came out in 2010 that if you haven't listened to, you should. It's kind of deeply indie-tastic. If two years ago was the list of new folk, and last year was the list of pop punk, this is definitely the year of indie rock.

41st and Home: Left In Places. This is the album that I really hoped that High Violet would be. It's lush, dark, and beautiful. It has big guitars and big strings, and songs about lost love and worlds that should have been.

Shearwater: The Golden Archipelago. Yeah. It's a pretentious prog rock concept album about Bikini Atoll. But Jonathan Meiburg could sing the phone book with that kind of instrumental structure, and I'd listen to it. I saw them play live at Sala Rossa in Montreal earlier this year, and it was just spellbinding.

The Gaslight Anthem: American Slang. I'd liked The 59 Sound, but this is the album where I fell in love with Gaslight Anthem. Cat had picked it up, and had it in random shuffle on her ipod. The three of us were working in the kitchen upstairs when When We Were Young came on, and thirty seconds in to the track we all just stopped and listened, blown away. Then we started it again.

Arcade Fire: The Suburbs. This is probably the most coherent album that Arcade Fire has done. I didn't love Neon Bible at all, and was sort of ready to categorize Arcade Fire as a band that had one amazing track (Rebellion) and a great live show. And then they released The Suburbs, which wasn't just one track but a whole album that fit together and kept it going.

Frightened Rabbit - The Winter of Mixed Drinks. This is my album of the year, hands down. It's not necessarily a cheery album - it's about the seductive nature of despair and nihilism - but somewhere deep down there's just this kernel of hope for redemption that makes it brilliant.

Outstanding concerts for the year were Jack's Mannequin, Shearwater, Arcade Fire, Great Big Sea, Josh Ritter, and Steel Train.

What else should I be listening to?
random: (Quebec City Summit of the Americas)
Dear October,

I am afraid to inform you that, due to reasons of gross negligence, we are forced to terminate your employment at this time. I would ask that you not return to the premises; your belongings will be retrieved by security.

Under the circumstances, I am afraid that I would not feel comfortable providing any kind of favourable reference to potential future employers.

Sincerely,
Ian.
random: (Default)
OK - this is officially bending my head a little.

It is well known that, in general, I tend to consider programming at cons and the like as something that other people go to.

It is specifically known that this applies at least double to Kaleidoscope.

I decided I should at least flip through this year's KG program so that I knew what I wasn't going to go to - and not only are there a lot of things that I want to go to, there are hard conflicts where I'm not sure on.

I mean, the first actual programming slot has Linda Demissey on the magical power of ancient language, [personal profile] reyl talking about the political and spiritual issues of gendered traditions, and MA and Auz doing land welcoming rit.

There are three or four other slots where I'm equally "OK, where do I go?" And as well as Heather, Devon, Brendan, and Castalia's concerts, I'm particularly looking forward to Bren's ritual re-enaction of the Battle of Maigh Tuireadh (for sheer awesome wackiness).

So massive, massive shout-outs to MA and Auz for putting together a program that's inclusive, crunchy, and interesting.
random: (Default)
I for one welcome our new radioactive beaver overlords.
random: (Corporate Tool)
Is this the coolest thing ever?

Well, probably not.

But really. Google Russia has (what looks it clearly started as somebody's 10%-er project) integrated video of the entire length of the Trans-Siberian railroad with Google Maps geolocation - you can follow the route of the entire railroad, click anywhere on the route, and start watching the train move from there.

OK, maybe it's only me that thinks that's really freaking cool.
random: (Default)
So, I was reminded at [personal profile] beable's party last night that I had not actually posted the OK Go Rube Goldberg video of awesomeness, which I had promised a few weeks ago that I would do. So, for those who haven't seen it yet, there is no world in which this is not worth four minutes of your time:




This post got catalyzed and expanded today, when [personal profile] emceeaich posted some videos from Pomplamoose, a duo who do what they call video-songs, following two basic principles:
1 - What you see is what you hear: The takes shown on the video are the takes in the audio track.
2 - There are no hidden sounds: If it's on the audio track, it's on the video track at some point.

I absolutely love how they do this. They've got both original songs, but they're also finishing up an album of cover songs, some of which are fascinating. Their version of Michael Jackson's Beat It is actually really good, while I love their version of Beyonce's All The Single Ladies for the sheer ironic deconstruction, and the fact that they don't at all hide their contempt for the original song.



Finally, in sort of decreasing order of ironic posting, I'm just loving Frightened Rabbit's new album, and if you're not familiar with them, you should watch the video for their new single.

random: (Default)
So, since I went to Anticipation last year, I'm eligible to nominate for the Hugos this year.

And since I'm often cranky about what's in the Hugos, I thought I should. But I haven't actually been reading all that much SF this year, especially in short fiction. So if there's stuff people think I should vote for, please let me know.

Here's my ballot so far. Any holes in here, I'm welcome to tossing on things that other people think should be +1 boosted.

Best Novel:
* Walter Jon Williams - This is not a game
* China Mieville - The City & The City
* Karl Schroeder - The Sunless Countries
* Catherynne Valente - Palimpsest

(I'm not entirely 100% sure about Palimpsest, but I'm not happy tossing in a best novel ballot that's all male authors, given last year's ballot where so many strong books by female authors were ignored. On the other hand, I've found this an unfortunately weak year for books by female authors. I've recently picked up Cherie Priest's Boneshaker, Justine Larbalestier's Liar, and Nancy Kress' To Steal The Sky, but I don't think I'll have time to read them by the submission deadline. What other great books came out this year that I'm missing? )

Best Novella:

I haven't yet read much of Robin Sloan's Annabel Scheme yet, but I love the premise and I love his work - so I'm going to try to read it, and even if I don't I'll probably toss it on the ballot anyways if I don't have other stuff to go there. And cause I'd love to see something crowd-funded on a Hugo ballot - and while I have some of Cat Valente's other stuff on my list, I don't think Fairyland is quite Hugo novel territory.

Best Novelette:
* Michael Bishop - Vinegar Peace, or the wrong-way used-adult orphanage

Only one, but it's brilliant. Searing, harsh, and Bishop at the height of his powers, writing out his demons. Probably the best thing Bishop's written since Unicorn Mountain or Count Geiger's Blues.

Best Short Story:
* Robin Sloan - Mr. Penumbra's Twenty-Four Hour Book Store
* Catherynne M. Valente - The radiant car thy sparrows drew

Campbell Award:
* Cecil Castellucci
* Seanan McGuire
random: this is what family looks like (this is what family looks like)
Pissed off about Kenney's use of ministerial authority to remove information about queer rights from Canada's citizenship guide?

Send him a letter using CUPE's handy action centre.

Also, please feel free to pass the link on.
random: (Default)
Courtesy of [personal profile] pecunium, I can't decide if this is more hilarious or depressing - it's kind of both.

I think that If yes, please outline the fundamental beliefs. If applicable, attach a copy of the bylaws or minutes of meetings from the last year. is quite possibly the funniest part of the form.

Apparently, penalties for failing to register your "subversive group" in South Carolina are a fine of up to 25,000 dollars, and as much as ten years in prison. I'm trying to figure out just how many Facebook groups I belong to that would qualify as subversive groups by their definition - that is groups that "directly or indirectly advocate, advise, teach or practice the duty or necessity of controlling, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, the state of South Carolina or any political division thereof."

Cause for me? Democratic government is all about controlling, and if necessary overthrowing, a government that fails to listen to the voice of its voters.

Edit: The actual text of the law that led to the creation of the form is at least a little less vague, if no less ridiculous. Highlights follow:

Every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means, who resides, transacts any business or attempts to influence political action in this State, shall register with the Secretary of State on the forms and at the times prescribed by him.

[...]

The terms of this chapter do not apply to any labor union or religious, fraternal or patriotic organization, society or association, or their members, whose objectives and aims do not contemplate the overthrow of the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means.

Yeah. I'm sure that's going to work so well, folks.
random: (Quebec City Summit of the Americas)
"Having considered all of the information and other evidence presented to the Court, I am satisfied that Hassan Almrei has not engaged in terrorism and is not and was not a member of an organization that there are reasonable grounds to believe has, does or will engage in terrorism. I find that there are no reasonable grounds to believe that Hassan Almrei is today, a danger to the security of Canada. Thus, I find that none of the grounds of inadmissibility in subsection 34(1) of the Act have been made out and, accordingly, I find that the certificate is not reasonable and must be quashed."

This is a man who has been in solitary confinement for most of the last eight years, without access to proper legal representation, and with government and CSIS lawyers spending most of the time arguing about what evidence they should be required to give the judges, let alone the defense.

Don't get me wrong. I'm no fan of fundamentalist regimes, or people who think that they can import them through violence. But I'm also no fan of security states. And the right to freedom from arbitrary detention, and the ability to mount a defense responding to the evidence against you and putting it in context, are fundamental pillars of our legal tradition and civil liberties. Habeas corpus - it's not just for breakfast any more.

I'm glad that he's been found innocent, and wish him all the best in putting his life back together. Now, for the rest of the security certificates, charge them properly and show their guilt - or let them go.
random: (Quebec City Summit of the Americas)
Signal boosting for the United Farm Workers, who have an online form where you can e-mail the chair of the Texas Board of Education.

The TX State Board of Education is currently preparing to adopt new social studies curriculum standards. These standards have major national implications as Texas is such a major purchaser of textbooks and their state’s required curriculum drives the content of textbooks produced nationwide.

[...]

The TX State Board of Education has hired 6 "experts" to determine what will be in the books their schools use. Some of these "experts" are arguing that the state’s social studies and history textbooks are giving "too much attention" to some of the most prominent civil rights leaders in US History, namely Cesar Chavez and Thurgood Marshall. [...] Another of these "experts" evangelical minister Peter Marshall said, "To have Cesar Chavez listed next to Ben Franklin"--as in the current standards--"is ludicrous." He went on to say Chávez is not a role model who "ought to be held up to our children as someone worthy of emulation."

[...]

Board members and their appointees have complained about an "over representation of minorities" in the current social studies standards.


This make you cranky too? E-mail, or better yet, call Gail Lowe, the chair of the Board of Education in Texas. Especially if you're an American - mention that it concerns you deeply, as school publishers tend to only put together one national edition. Especially, especially, if you're a Texan, and vote there.

Profile

random: (Default)
Random

May 2013

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213 1415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 22nd, 2026 09:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios