One bone I have to pick with some prolife groups is the way they immediately criticize any abortion facility any time they send a patient to the hospital in an ambulance. I find this short-sighted and ultimately dangerous. We want prochoice people to seriously look at claims that abortions are being performed safely, and do the women a disservice when actions might make facilities hesitate to call emergency services promptly.
I took my concerns to Grok, and ended up with this recommended template for dealing with these situations in a way that might actually get prochoice people to ask questions instead of just dismissing the story as hyperbole or hysteria:
However, we do have legitimate concerns about the facility's overall safety record. According to the Guttmacher Institute (a pro-choice research organization), serious complications requiring hospitalization occur in only about 0.3% of abortions. Acme Reproductive, based on state health department inspection reports, performs approximately 1,200 abortions per year. If Guttmacher's estimates hold, that should mean just 3-4 ambulance transports annually—yet this is already their third reported incident in the first three months of the year.
This discrepancy raises important questions: Are the low complication rates cited by advocates like the Alan Guttmacher Institute understated, or does Acme need to address underlying issues in training, protocols, or oversight? Women deserve transparency and real safety, not just access."
Let's put forth our assertions in a way that are most likely to lead to a healthy skepticism about American abortion practice rather than in a way that makes us look like we're always going off halfcocked.

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)








