Some things worth toasting on New Year's Eve!

Instapundit said this was a must-read; well, he wasn't kidding! Read this and you'll have both a smile on your face, and some good news to share with any doom-and-gloomers in your circle of friends.

And more good news: People keep donating to the Red Cross via Amazon. It's up to $5.8 million, from over 92,000 contributors (we're one of them). I heard Kofi Annan on the radio this afternoon; he said that total pledges from all sources are up to half a billion dollars. That oughta help.

UPDATE: It's 9:40 p.m. CST, and Amazon has hit and surpassed the 100,000 contributors mark, with $6.7 million donated.

Bush Bashing

Howard Fine is on the Today Show right now; he's bashing Bush for not saying enough about the tsunami tragedy on the first day. Says we lost an opportunity to win the "hearts and minds", etc.

Maybe, maybe not. But I'm quite sure that no matter what Bush had said or done, the usual suspects would have lined up to criticize him with the "too little too late" mantra.

In any event, the United States, as always, will do more to help the survivors, and do it in a more efficient way, than any other country. I have confidence in both our President and my fellow Americans about that.

Howard Fine is right about a couple of things: he says donations are pouring in via the Internet. Amazon is now up to $4.2 million, with 70,000 contributors. That's more than doubled in the last 24 hours. My prediction stands: 100,000 contributors by the end of this week.

Fine also says this is a generous country, both individually and governmentally. He's right. Good to say it, in light of the "stingy" remark.

Poverty, Welfare, and Real People

This morning I read a George Will review (courtesy of Townhall's daily "Opinion Alert" email) of "American Dream: Three Women, Ten Kids, and Nation's Drive to End Welfare", by Jason DeParle. The book looks at what's happened since the Welfare Reform efforts of the '90's. The answer: Lots of things, and nothing, at the same time. Yes, the number of people on welfare dropped dramatically, and those people found jobs instead, but at the same time, there lives didn't necessarily change in drastic ways, as many hoped and expected.

Read the review to see what that means in the life of one Milwaukee woman in particular. My aunt, who taught in Milwaukee Public Schools for her whole career, had plenty of first-hand experience with the disorganized lives of many families living in the central city. Those poor kids started school five years behind the other kids, because their lives were in such chaos. Some never saw their fathers, or perhaps didn't even know who they were. Some were never read to, talked to, taught their colors or shapes or, in some cases, even their first and last names. And then teachers are expected to get those kids up to speed by third grade.

Back to George Will's review; here's an interesting line:

What can help organize lives -- at least those that are organizable -- is work. The requirements of work -- mundane matters such as punctuality, politeness and hygiene -- are essential to the culture of freedom.

As a mom, I can use that line with my kids. It sure makes "say please" and "clean up your room" sound much more important, doesn't it? "Hey kids, it's not just what I want, it's what the culture of freedom needs!"

Update on the disaster

Amazon.com's donation page should have an http of "amazin'.com". Over $1.4 $1.5 million has been raised for the Red Cross disaster relief fund. Refresh the page and watch it go up about a thousand dollars a minute, as best as I can tell. The total has more than doubled in the past 12 hours.

Instapundit has another interesting post on the topic.

Again, please consider even a small donation. I like the American Red Cross just fine, and that's where the Amazon money goes. You can also find a list of other places to donate here (hat tip Ann Althouse).

All the money in the world won't relieve the terrible sadness of this disaster, the loss of so many children, the terrible burden the survivors have of knowing that they weren't able to save their loved ones, but it surely will help fight the rampant disease that some are predicting, and will help with the rebuilding.

UPDATE: Added a link to Amazon; I missed it earlier. Now the total is $1.6 million, with only 30,000 donors. I'm guessing there will be at least 100,000 donors by the end of the week.

Terrifying

Read this account of the tsunami. Can't imagine the horror. What a surreal experience it must have been to see the ocean disappear.

Instapundit has a great post on the Amazon.com fundraiser to help the victims. Read his account, and then, if you feel moved by the spirit, donate a little something. Maybe even as little as what you spent on your last book or CD or DVD from Amazon. It sure is adding up fast -- over $600,000 already! How dare the U.N. call Americans "stingy"!

The Devastation of the Tsunami

I have really been out of it the past few days and haven't very much followed the stories about the horrible tidal wave. I haven't been reading the bloggers, haven't seen any network news, haven't read much of the paper, and haven't even been to Drudge since the first reports on Christmas Day.

But today I finally had a chance to check around the blogosphere, and I am horrified at the scope of the disaster. Now, Drudge is saying "60,000". Unbelievable.

A friend told me today that her college age daughter's friend went to Thailand for Christmas. They haven't heard from him, and have no idea if he's alive or not. How frightening that must be. I can't imagine being there. Conditions must be absolutely nightmarish.

God bless those poor people, our brothers and sisters across the ocean. I am not deserving of the comfort in which I live, but I do appreicate it even more today, and my prayers will go up to God for mercy on the dead and courage for the survivors.

Hot Buttered Rum

Here is the best recipe for Hot Buttered Rum you will ever find. A friend made this for us some years ago, and it's become one of our holiday favorites. There is nothing better on a cold winter night. It's so good you can even make the drink without the rum, if you want (which I can't understand, but hey, it's up to you.)

Here goes:

1 lb. brown sugar

1/2 lb. butter, softened

1 tsp. ground nutmeg

1 tsp. cinnamon

1 tsp. ground cloves

1 tsp. cardamom

1 tsp. vanilla

Blend all ingredients with a mixer; store in fridge or freezer in a tightly covered container. Will keep for months in the fridge this way -- if you can make it last that long.

If you don't have all the spices, don't worry. Just use what you have. But it will be unbelievably good if you use them all! My absolute favorite source for spices: Penzey's.

To make the drink, fill an Irish coffee mug with boiling water (leaving just enough space at the top for the rum); add 2 heaping Tablespoons of the batter and stir well. Top off with a shot of rum. You can use cinnamon sticks for more stirring, for a nice Martha-esque touch.

I Googled for this recipe, just to see what was out there, and let me tell you there are many inferior Hot Buttered Rum recipes. Don't be fooled. But I enjoyed this bit of advice, on a site with the correct recipe, about what proportions of batter and rum to use:

One theory of hot-toddy making is that it is impossible to use too much batter and you should keep stirring more in until you are bored with stirring. Another theory of hot-toddy making is that it is impossible to use too much rum, and that you should keep stirring in more until your friends panic.

I'd say you couldn't go wrong with either approach. Enjoy!

Merry Christmas, everyone!

On this, the second third fourth day of Christmas (time flies; it's taking me forever to find the time to finish this post!), I wish you all a very Merry and Blessed Christmas season!

If you have been checking in here occasionally, you've noticed I haven't blogged since Wednesday. That's because Wednesday was my last day with more than two free minutes put together.

Warning: The rest of this ridiculously long post is going to be about nothing more than my family's Christmas; I'm mostly writing this for the benefit of a very dear friend (hello, D.!) who wrote on her Christmas card that she loves to be the "fly on the wall" in our home, via this blog. So, come back tomorrow if you're looking for more of a bloggish post. I've got some good ones in the hopper, I promise.

Thursday the 23rd was my dad's birthday. So I bopped over to my folks' house with a little gift (fruitcake, if you must know; he's one of the few people on the planet who actually loves it).

On the way there and back, I had 30 bazillion errands to run.

The best errand I had was to Toys R Us, because it was there that I had a "Miracle on 34th Street" moment. There's one of those every year. It's when you finally, after days or weeks of fruitless searching, find the gift you've been searching for, the one gift that will really make the kids' eyes light up, they one they really, really want, the one that makes you feel that you really and truly are Santa Claus. One year it was wooden nutcrackers, for our two little girls who wanted to be ballerinas and wanted nothing for Christmas except a tutu and a nutcracker. A few years later, it was the "Furreal Kitty", a gift which was so popular that nobody, but NObody, had it. I was with the kids in the mall one day when we overheard a clerk tell a frazzled shopper that they didn't have any, hadn't had any for weeks, that nobody else had them either. I just smiled, because I had managed to score two of them (albeit at a premium price), just days earlier.

And it was worth it, because on Christmas Day, when our girls opened up those gifts, they knew there really must be a Santa Claus. To this day, our daughters don't know how I did it, and even though they no longer believe in Santa, I won't tell. I figure there should always be a little mystery about Christmas. (And if you're wondering, I obtained the "Furreal" kitties through completely legal means. Let's just say, thank goodness for the Internet. But I'm not ruling out the help of St. Nick; sometimes, I believe in Santa Claus myself...)

This year, the elusive gift was a coach-and-horses set to go with the Barbie Princess-and-the-Pauper set. (A side note: The creative minds at Mattel are evil, eeeeeevil. Every year they come up with a new Barbie-as-a-princess doll, like Barbie-as-Rapunzel, or Barbie-in-Swan-Lake, or Barbie-as-Cinderella. Well, this year, they managed to come up with the Princess and the Pauper theme, so of course you have to buy the two dolls. What good is just the Princess, or just the Pauperess, if you're going to play out the whole story? Evil, I tell you. I can hear them laughing right now... an eeeeevil laugh... bwahahaha!!!)

Anyway, I found the coach and horses at the Toys R Us on 27th Street. Had searched at least four other stores and come up empty handed. But now I had it, and I was so happy that I didn't even mind standing in line forever (I picked the slowest one, of course). And sure enough, on Christmas morning, that was the gift that elicited the biggest gasp of surprise and delight from our little five year old daughter.

What was the point of this post again? Oh yes, "Why I Haven't Blogged Since Last Wednesday". So, The Great Toy Find was Thursday. Then, on Friday, Christmas Eve, we made our traditional trek to a Chicago suburb for my husband's family get-together. I love it. First, "midnight" Mass at 3 p.m., then a party at my sister-in-law's house. The highlight of the evening is when the doorbell rings and all the little ones jump up and run to the door; they know that Santa always leaves a bag of gifts on the front porch, with a little something for each of the kids. When I first joined the family 18 years ago, there were lots and lots of little kids rushing to the door. But as the years went by, the number of "believers" dwindled, and now, the only ones hurrying to try to catch a glimpse of Santa are my two little ones and one of the great-grandchildren. We need more of those grown grandchildren to get married and start their families to add to the numbers of children running when the doorbell rings again!

And finally, Christmas. Our seven-year-old son woke up at 5:00, nearly out of his mind with excitement: "Mom!!! It's Christmas!!! Santa! was! here!!! I can tell! He left decorations in my room!!!!" Since I hadn't gotten to sleep until about 2:00 in the morning, this was far too little sleep for me. So, I convinced him to go back to bed until it was at least light outside, and he finally drifted off again. At 8:30, the three girls all woke up, and that was it: Christmas morning had officially arrived. Our oldest peeked out a window: "It's snowing! Little flurries!" I'm a sucker for a White Christmas, so this delighted me as much as it did the kids.

The children waited, only a little impatiently, in the hallway while husband and I performed our morning ablutions (I never thought I'd have a chance to use that phrase, but there it is), and we all descended. They rushed into the family room, and the frenzy began. How can weeks of planning, thinking, searching, ordering, buying, and wrapping, all be over in a few minutes of ecstatic paper-tearing and package-opening?

Our dear friends from Madison stopped by; we had a mug of hot buttered rum (recipe to be posted here shortly; now there's a good reason to stop by here again soon!)

Then my family all arrived for Christmas dinner. We always have a wonderful time together; there's lots of talking (the decibel level gets a little out of control at times, but it's "good loud") and laughing. I'm blessed with two great parents and three terrific brothers and two delightful sisters-in-law and five wonderful nieces and nephews, all of whom I love very much, and all of whom get along famously. Is this too good to be true? Well, it's good, and it's true, so I guess it's not too good to be true.

We said a prayer before dinner, and "Happy Birthday, Jesus!" He is the one true gift for all of us; His birthday is truly something to celebrate. When you stop to think about that, you realize that all the festivities, all the shopping, decorating, feasting, gift-giving, are fitting. There's no better reason to be joyful.

Later that evening, the snow changed from little flurries to big, fat, fluffy flakes. "Cotton balls", as the 14-year-old put it. You know the end of "White Christmas", when they throw open the doors and it's snowing those huge Hollywood flakes? Well, it was like that. So I threw open the front door, and we all admired the beauty of the snow drifting down, illuminated by the spot lights on the front lawn.

And that was our Christmas Day.

On the attack in Mosul

Glenn Reynolds says this Belmont Club post is must reading, and he's right. It describes in great detail how the enemy in Iraq operates. Why don't we hear more about this from MSM? Belmont Club answers that question as well.

Here's a paragraph from the same post that shows just how badly Europe has lost her moral moorings:

The Daily Telegraph describes how some European agencies actually refuse to look at mass grave sites to avoid being party to the punishment of war criminals.

Lack of European experts has held up the excavation of mass graves in Iraq, according to an American human rights lawyer working on the investigation. Greg Kehoe said the experts were not joining in because evidence might be used to sentence Saddam Hussein to death. ...

Capital punishment is not permitted within the European Union which discourages its use elsewhere. EU countries also routinely refuse to extradite people to the United States and other countries unless they receive guarantees that detainees will not be executed. The Iraqi Special Tribunal has identified a further nine mass graves to be examined for evidence of the former Saddam regime's crimes against humanity. Human rights groups estimate that 300,000 people were killed. Mr Kehoe, who spent five years investigating mass graves in Bosnia for the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, said he wanted to have collected far more evidence by now, and cited the delay as one reason why the IST has yet to issue formal charges against Saddam and 11 other former regime leaders.

I'm so tired of being told that we should be more like the Europeans. First they lost the Faith, then they lost their nerve, now they're losing all ability to make moral choices.

God help us if we become any more like them.

Trouble at "Iraq the Model"

A friend emailed me last night with the depressing news that something was up over at Iraq the Model (ITM). Ali and his brothers Omar and Mohammed were the bloggers behind ITM; he says he's not going to be blogging with the other two anymore. My friend felt pretty bad about this, as she'd had some personal contact with Ali via email, and felt that she "knew" him, and liked his style, as well.

Judging from the fact that were over 770 comments on Ali's post, I'd say people are taking this pretty seriously. It doesn't help that Ali was unbearably vague about his reasons. Speculation abounds. Nastiness, too, based on some of the comments.

I will also say that quite of few of those commenters are taking the whole thing far too seriously. Ali is just one person, one blogger. He does not hold the fate of Iraq in his hands, nor can his opinions justify anyone else's political leanings. Far too much weight is being placed on his shoulders, in my opinion. So, people, my advice? Chill! Let the poor guy take a break. Let him have his opinions; they are independent of all of ours.

Last night, I checked around and found that N.Z. Bear also was in the dark about the ITM developments, and said the rest of the blogosphere seemed to be, as well. But that didn't stop the speculation.

Today, Omar and Mohammed have a post, which provides some info about their trip to the States, but not too much else. Guess we'll have to wonder for awhile yet.

Must reading on stem cells

Pro-lifers are on solid ground in objecting to research on embryonic stem cells, for far more than "merely" moral reasons. Read this article. It's excellent, and its filled with dozens of links for more reading.

For my own posts on the topic, click here and here. Oh, and one more, here. When you read that last one -- aren't you just so doggone happy that Bush won? Me, too!

I'm trying something new

Had a few quiet minutes tonight, so I'm expanding my horizons about blogging. Did a little searching, and found a site that provides free blog polls. So, here's my first poll!

UPDATE: Oh dear, that typo (it said "Bad" instead of "Had" but it's fixed now) was hanging there since Saturday. The funny thing is, when I put the poll script in my blog code, I got an error message, so I didn't think it worked. Then got busy with things around here and never even checked! Anyway, I'm glad the poll works but sorry the typo was there. And now, here's a plea: If you stop by here, please vote, because it looks so sad to see just three little votes on this poll...!

A "found" blog

Found this blog, Instapunk, from my sitemeter referrals page, and have been enjoying it. (Ya gotta love the chutzpah of the name.) Here's a post I particularly liked. Sample sentences:

I have no doubt that Bonnie Raitt would make the same remarks at a concert in El Paso, but it is particularly obnoxious when American celebrities insult their president in foreign lands. Yet they seem to become especially voluble about politics when they encounter the press in some European capital. Michael Moore, Sean Penn, Kate Hudson, Johnny Depp, Madonna, the Dixie Chicks and now Bonnie Raitt belong to an elite travel club -- "Let's take this huge fortune we made in America and fly off to an exotic destination where people will think we are smart because we have contempt for the American president and the idiots who support him."

Amber Alert for Unborn Baby

I'm sure that no one ever could have imagined an Amber Alert for this situation (via Drudge). Someone killed a woman who was eight months pregnant, cut out her unborn child, and kidnapped the baby. Seems to me this has happened at least once before but I'm not going to Google it right now.

Again, if this baby deserves an Amber Alert (and it does), why could a baby the same age be killed with impunity via partial-birth abortion? When will people realize that our abortion laws make no sense?

Thank you!

Thank you to all who donated to the Spirit of America Blogger Challenge! Our team did pretty well; we came in fourth. And overall, bloggers raised $90,617! Not bad! If you missed the deadline (which was the 15th), you can always go ahead and donate on your own. It's a great cause.

Gun Control: Not a good idea

San Francisco is considering a total handgun ban in the city (hat tip Instapundit.) A couple of key quotes:

"The hope is twofold, that officers will have an opportunity to interact with folks and if they have a handgun, that will be reason enough to confiscate it," he said. "Second, we know that for even law-abiding folks who own guns, the rates of suicide and mortality are substantially higher. So while just perceived to be a crime thing, we think there is a wide benefit to limiting the number of guns in the city."

The Nanny State lives; we're going to protect people from themselves, no matter that the only people left with guns will be the bad guys.

But there's hope:

The proposal was immediately dismissed as illegal, however, by Gun Owners of California, a Sacramento-based lobbying group. Sam Paredes, the group's executive director, said the state has for years had a "pre-emption law" on the books that bars local governments from usurping the state's authority to regulate firearms.

"The amazing thing is they are going to turn San Francisco into ground zero for every criminal who wants to profit at their chosen profession," Paredes said. "People are going to be assaulted, people are going to be robbed, people are going to be pushed around by thugs and the police are going to be powerless to do anything about it."

I've come a long way in my views on gun control. Maybe 10 years ago, I remember a discussion with my mom, during which I argued that there was nothing wrong with gun control. Too many guns = too many crimes, too many deaths, was my argument then.

However, after [we interrupt this post with this special bulletin: A mosquito just flew across my screen. I attempted to bring it down - no, not with a gun, with my hands! - but missed. Now, remember, this is WISCONSIN. It's mid-December, about 23 degrees out there. What on EARTH is a mosquito doing in here?!? Good Lord, this global warming has just gone too far. We now return to our post.]

As I was saying, after many discussions with my brother, an avid second-amendment defender, I realized the error of my ways. With over 6,000 gun laws on the books, we really don't need more laws. We could use a little more enforcement, maybe, and a little more respect for the law, perhaps more law-abiding citizens, but more gun laws? Not going to help. At all. It's a bait and switch: Here, we'll pass more gun laws so the average citizen feels safer, and then pretty soon we'll take all your guns and the only people with guns will be the bad guys, and the government. Is that the kind of America we want? I don't think so.

[Dang, there's that mosquito again. It's silent. I can never remember: Do the biting ones make the buzzing noise, or not? The females bite, right? But do they buzz?]

One degree of separation from "The Weekly Standard"

Imagine my excitment when I read Hugh's column on the Weekly Standard (online) and found that he links to his symposium post which links to... me! Of course, his post links to me and dozens of other bloggers, but that's OK.

Just one click between the Weekly Standard and me.

I feel like The Little Blog That Could.

UPDATE: Thanks, guys, for the nice comments! Don't worry, this really isn't going to my head; it's just kind of fun, that's all. When it comes right down to it, I guess there's just one or two clicks between any one of us and any other single thing in the universe. Let's see, one degree of separation between my blog and this place. That and a buck will get you a cup of coffee. But not at Starbuck's.

Fun with Blogs (or, "If you have 10 minutes to completely waste, click here")

Is this not the truth?

Rachel Lucas is baaaaack. Do NOT click on that link if you are offended by bad language and completely uninhibited rants. But if you can stand a bit of that and you want to be entertained, by all means, go ahead and click. Rachel was one of the first bloggers I stumbled across (perhaps via Bill Whittle, but I really couldn't say for sure). Then, she just stopped blogging. She probably got more hits for not blogging, just from people checking in to see if she'd posted something new, than I ever did for blogging my brains out. Sort of a slot-machine thing; keep checking, keep checking, then, jackpot! A new post! Now she's back, as the "Blue Eyed Infidel". I can't help myself; her stuff makes me laugh, in spite of her meanness and wash-that-mouth-out-with-soap style. Just remember, I warned you.

Apparently, this is "Poke Fun at Bloggers" week. So, here is a good place to start on that project. Bloggers will probably chuckle. Non-bloggers will probably say, "huh?" (Not "heh", "huh".)

The Dems are trying to have a "Blue Christmas": they're blacklisting companies that support Republican candidates. No, I'm not kidding; yes, it's a really dumb idea; and yes, of course, we can go to their list and BUY FROM THE RED COMPANIES! So, here are a couple of suggestions: avoid Barnes and Noble (hello Amazon!), avoid Costco (hello Walmart!), avoid Gallo (avoid Gallo? I've been doing that since I got out of grad school), avoid Starbucks (not a problem, if I'm avoiding B&N). Seriously, though, I don't do boycotts; I think they're too much trouble and usually ineffective, and our money is so interconnected anyway, through manufacturers and distributors and advertisers and retailers, that it's kind of meaningless. But it is amusing that the "Buy Blue" idea can be so easily used against itself.

That's all. I should have been wrapping presents or vacuuming the basement lower-level lodge (note to self: post about that soon) or doing just about anything else but this. But what's a hobby for if you can't have a little fun and waste a little time on it? As far as hobbies go, blogging is a whole lot cheaper than most.

Come to think of it, it's also a whole lot more of a waste of time than most.

Sigh.

Hugh Hewitt's Symposium VI

Hugh's question is, "What does Newsweek's story on Christmas tell us about MSM?" The Newsweek story is a skeptical, doubting look at the Christmas story.

So what does this story tell us about MSM? Well, it's really pretty simple (and I say this before reading all the other bloggers' submissions in the symposium; when I do that, I'm sure I'll find out that it's not that simple at all!)

Anyway, here's my opinion: Journalists are taught to be skeptical, and the field itself probably attracts people who are skeptical to begin with. Faith probably comes hard for them, I think, just as it does for people in the field of psychology (I know, because that's my field). They're taught -- or naturally inclined -- to not trust those in positions of authority, to look for ulterior motives, to doubt the veracity of sources, to check, check, double check. You know the line: If your mother tells you she loves you, check it out!

So, I'm sure they find it very hard to accept what 2000 years of Church teaching sets forth in regard to the Christmas story (or anything else, for that matter, such as abortion or euthanasia).

I'm not saying that all reporters are non-believers, just as not all psychologists are. But it doesn't surprise me in the least to see this kind of story published in Newsweek.

Of course, you have to wonder where all that skepticism goes when a "journalist" is given fraudulent documents....

UPDATE: Welcome, Hugh Hewitt visitors, and Merry Christmas to you all!

Good news in the War on Terror

This is very good news. Read the whole thing.

While you're there, read a few other articles by Pipes, including this. I've been meaning to post about that one for some time now. Pipes discusses the targeted killing of Christians in Muslim countries, and the article indirectly poses the question of martyrdom.

Read the article, and then ponder. What would you do? Would you learn the Koranic verses Pipes cites and falsely claim to be a Muslim, to literally save your neck?

Or would you die a martyr, proclaiming "Viva Christo Rey!" as did Padre Pro in 1927?

UPDATE: The commenter below asks if Padre Pro was the inspiration for priest in the the Graham Greene novel "The Power and the Glory". According to this site, he was. I have no idea what kind of personal life Padre Pro led, but he did die a martyr's death, as did the whiskey-priest in "Power and Glory". (Kudos, JAS, for thinking of that connection!)

I've been looking for a reason to keep blogging...

... and maybe this is a good one:

"Through blogging we can spread love more than hate." - Mohammed of Iraq the Model

Phishing and other phunny things

If you're going to go phishing for people's credit info, you ought to at least be somewhat proficient in the English language. Here's part of a phraudulent phishing scam pretending to be from Paypal.

During our regular maintennance updates and procedures, we have reviewed all account informations that are securely stored on our database. Our staff have found accounts that needs to be updated in order to maintain the integrity of accounts. At this point, we require you to verify you account information by accessing you account.

This update must be done immediately in order for us to update your account information. Otherwise, we will temporarily block all access to your account until updates has been completed. (Emphasis mine, of course.)

It's probably a good thing they mangle the language; they phool phewer people that way. Enough of the "ph" thing. But one question: Why did they start calling that scam "phishing", anyway?

Other phunny funny things: Getting an 8-foot-tall and approximately 8-foot-wide Fraser Fir tree into the house, through a 3-foot-wide door. Getting tree up into the stand, with four kids standing around indicating if it's leaning left, right, forward, or back. Getting tree to stay upright in stand without falling over (hint: attach cuphook to baseboard behind tree; use guy wire). Discovering the next morning that tree isn't drinking any water. Discussing whether tree should be removed from stand, dripping water and sap over carpet, then re-cut at the base and re-inserted into tree stand, repeating above steps re: four kids indicating whether tree is leaning, etc.

Now that's hilarious, especially before a second cup of coffee.

After the second cup, we determined that the tree was, too, drinking; it must have sucked up at least a pint overnight. Good enough.

More later... laptop battery is beeping.

"Iraq the Model" goes to Washington

The Iraqi bloggers from Iraq the Model were in the States recently, in New York and D.C., with some west coast cities coming up.

Glenn notes he had to turn down an invitation to go D.C. to meet them. Well, I got an invitation to that event, too. Really. But I'm sure it wasn't as personal as Glenn's probably was. As a donor to Spirit of America, (by the way, please give!) I received an email inviting me to the meet-and-greets. And I would have loved to have gone -- but circumstances being what they are (four kids, homeschooling, Christmas coming soon, no frequent flyer tickets) it just wasn't in the cards.

I hope they're having a wonderful time on their grand tour of the States, and I hope they get to meet many of the people who support them. They met the President, those lucky dogs, so that's a good thing.

You really should check in with the blogging brothers every so often. Here's a delightful quote from a recent post:

It was really confusing to me in the beginning that liberals would not support the change in Iraq (remember we were isolated so we didn't know much about that) even though they were against Bush, as it's over now and any humanist should (in my mind) support democracy and peace in Iraq. Besides, I've always considered myself a liberal! On the other side, I had a bad impression that many of the people on the right were fanatics and racist! How much did we learn in this year!

Now this is just wrong.

So why did I laugh?

Faith and Reason: Wings of the spirit

A couple of interesting things. First, a dear friend sent me an email the other day, with this quote:

Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth; and God has placed in the human heart a desire to know the truth -- in a word, to know himself -- so that, by knowing and loving God, men and women may also come to the fullness of truth about themselves (cf. Ex 33:18; Ps 27:8-9; 63:2-3;Jn 14:8; 1 Jn 3:2)."

It's from Pope John Paul II's 1998 encyclical, Fides et Ratio. Beautiful, isn't it? Something to contemplate in this Advent season.

The other interesting thing is here, via Drudge yesterday. It's a case study of the above point: a leading atheist, who spent his life trying to prove the non-existence of God, has decided that the evidence points the other way. He now says that there is, in fact, a God. I don't think he's found the fullness of truth yet, but he's on the right path -- and none too soon. He's 81 years old. You don't suppose he's just going with Pascal's wager, do you?

The End is Near!

No, not of the world, just of the Blogger Challenge for Spirit of America.

So high thee to the link herewith mightily. Or something. Just please, go here, and donate. In fact, donate twice as much as the first number that occurs to you.

Because if you don't, the TTLB team is going to lose big time to the Northern Alliance. They already think they're all that, just because they have the likes of Power Line and Hugh and all the rest of 'em. I mean, come on. We've got some mighty fine bloggers, too.

But that's not the real reason to donate, of course. The real reason is that Spirit of America is about the coolest organization I've come across in a long time. They're making a real difference in Irag and Afghanistan, and this is a much better way to truly support our soldiers than just slapping a yellow ribbon on the back of the van (though I did that, too).

So, if you got here randomly ("Next Blog", anyone?) or if you actually are one of the four people who comes here on purpose, please give. Thank you.

Depressing Demographics for Democrats

In previous posts, here and here, I discussed the "Roe Effect" (term coined by James Taranto) and the "Roe Effect Corollary", both of which suggest that liberals may be an endangered species because of the effects of abortion, and because liberals just don't want to have many children (worried about overpopulation, perhaps).

Here's an interesting article (NYT registration required) that looks at the other side of the equation: conservatives are having bigger families. David Brooks calls this segment of the population "natalists"; they have three, four, or more kids, and are found primarily in red counties, especially in the exurbs targeted so well by the Bush team.

Well, by his definition, we're natalists (four kids). You'll find lots of "natalists" in Catholic homeschooling circles; I personally know of several families with ten children, and quite a few with more than six. There are about 120 families in our own little support group, and about two to three families more families join every month. We worked very hard to get President Bush re-elected, and we teach our children why we vote the way we do.

I don't much care for the term "natalist" (sounds too much like "fatalist", for one thing, and also strikes me as reminiscent of the pejorative term "breeder") but there's no question that families like ours are going to help shape the future of this country.

Here's a great page if you're interested in the views of liberals opposed to having children; the "rants" page links to articles referring to humans as a "cancer on the earth", and calling for voluntary human extinction. And no, I'm not kidding.

"Christmas Lites"

(Note: The following was added as a comment to the previous post; it's so good it has to have its very own post. Thanks, Guest Blogger! You will remain anonymous unless you choose to reveal yourself!)

Late October -- pumpkins, corn stalks, leaves turning colors, of course, it must be... Christmas! Well, not Christmas, Christmas is gone, now it's "The Holidays". Whatever happened to Christmas? For that matter, whatever happened to Thanksgiving? Holiday decorations go on sale by Halloween. What's more, I notice that many of my neighbors now put up as many Halloween lights and decorations as they do for "The Holidays", only the color changes from orange to red or green or white.

Our paper carrier included a card with the newspaper, wishing us the warmest generic holiday greetings on November 19th, one week before Thanksgiving. As best I can tell, that card is celebrating snow and sleighs. The city parks are decorated in October with lights which are conceptually removed from Christmas; they depict French Horns, teddy bears, drums, packages, trees, snowflakes, and bells. These are lit nightly starting in early November which temporally removes them from the actual event of Christmas as well.

At work, my company has a "Holiday Gift Giving Program" for charity which used to be the Christmas Giving Tree, and a "Holiday Food Day", formerly known as an office Christmas Party. As an aside, those Christmas parties of old also featured (brace yourself) raw beef! We also said "Merry Christmas", and some people smoked cigarettes right there in front of everyone. This renaming is insidious; are we so afraid of offending the non-Christians in our midst that we feel compelled to wash out our own most significant religious holidays? I won't participate in these activities this year, they celebrate NOTHING.

Maybe it's just a sign of our culture overall. The world of "lite" mayonnaise, half the carbs, half the fat, half the calories, washed down with half-caff coffee or Light Beer. These decorations, parties, and lights are part of the trend toward "Christmas Lite". The charitable activities are in the secular name of honorable humanistic intentions, atheistic or at least agnostic, void of God and Christ. It publicly acknowledges the season, but it removes all the meaning of Christmas or Jesus.

Some might wonder what's wrong with starting the season early, supplanting the word Christmas with Holidays, or commercializing Santa? Starting the holidays earlier eliminates the true Christmas season. It skips Advent - a time of waiting and preparation. It lumps the secular and sometimes suspect Halloween with Thanksgiving and Christmas, attempting to give them equal and secular significance. As far as the semantics, the words help convey the meaning, it's that simple. "Holidays" used in this manner is tepid and I can't stand it, either it's Christmas or it isn't. Santa is Saint Nicholas, typically depicted as avuncular, smiling, warm, downright holy - a symbol easily tied to the religious aspects of Christmas. But your post points out something more. First the Santa image started getting homelier and usually is accompanied by that grating, cloying electronic "music" that plays repeatedly via motion sensor. But now the image of Santa isn't just luke-warm and washed out, it's being reversed into the nasty grin of the Grinch, not merely washing away the religion but replacing it with an evil twist.

This isn't exactly the Christians being thrown to the lions, but it is a case of letting a small group of atheists push us around the town square a bit. I think the gift-giving aspect of Christmas has also added to the commercial tone (Hey, throw a Santa hat on a Grinch if it sells a DVD or two - we need sales, this season makes or breaks us!). But instead of being cheerful or uplifting, this can mock the real joy behind Christmas in a way that's depressingly hollow. But none of that can stop you from finding a minute to light a candle, to say a prayer and thank God for the beginning of a life that affects and saves ours. Have yourself a Merry Little Christmas. I know I will, at home and at Mass, with a Nativity set, a Christmas tree, St. Nick, and family and friends.

UPDATE: The guest blogger says I can reveal his identity: It's my husband (which I knew immediately, but since he didn't add his initials to the end of the post, I respected his anonymity.)

Keeping "Christ" out of "Christmas"

A couple of items for this "holiday" season.

Ann Althouse has this post, with photos of Madison's "Holiday Tree". It's not a "Christmas tree", God forbid , heaven help us, [insert generic non-religious exclamation here], but apparently it's still too religious for the atheists. So, the "Freedom from Religion" organization put up a sign, saying, among other things, that religion "hardens hearts and enslaves minds". Read Ann's fisking of the sign.

This story in today's Chicago Tribune covered the controversy over a "holiday party" at a Chicago area public school, which was billed as an inclusive party, but excluded any mention of Christ or Christmas. The story had two accompanying photos: this one, which is pretty cute, and another one that unfortunately isn't online but was on the back page of the first section. It showed a creepy-looking Grinch in a Santa costume holding a little girl. This was what the Grinch face looked like. I asked my husband, "What does this make you think of?". He immediately answered, "The dev*l". (Don't want to spell it out because I don't particularly want sat*n*sts coming to this site via Google.) My 14-year-old said, "Evil! And ugly." Now, I know a lot of people like the Grinch, but I'm really not crazy about it; not the book, nor the animated special, nor the movie. And in any event, I'm really not crazy about the creepy looking Grinch that was at the school. Ugh. It just seems weird to me that it's OK to have that at a "holiday" party, but nothing about the real meaning of Christmas.

Somebody stole the baby Jesus out of the manager at Daley Plaza in Chicago. (The thief was caught.) Best comment of all on the case came from a child:

After overhearing the news, Sasha Kovacs-Johnson, 7, said she didn't understand.

"If someone was a good guy, they wouldn't take it," she said. "If someone was a bad guy, they wouldn't even want it."

Go figure. Maybe it was somebody who just was doing his part to literally keep Jesus out of the public square.

Euthanasia

The recent story about babies and young children being euthanized in the Netherlands is very distressing, as noted here previously. These children are the canaries in the coalmine for the rest of us; their deaths warn of a nightmarish future. The "right to die" will become "the duty to die", in less time than we might imagine.

Hugh Hewitt has been on top of this from the start, much to his credit; he's also noted the ho-hum response from MSM and much of the blogosphere.

The problem, I think, is that it's very hard for someone who wants to remain "pro-choice" (and that counts most in the MSM and probably any libertarian-leaning bloggers) to maintain a consistent ethic here. If you approve of legal abortion, even for babies who are perhaps only a few weeks away from a due date, how can you be appalled by the euthanizing of infants just a few days or weeks past that due date, especially if they have the same kind of illness or defect for which they could have been legally aborted? As some are saying, it's simply "post-birth abortion".

Peter Singer has been advocating this for years, saying parents should have up to 28 days after a child is born to decide whether to let it live. Read this recent article; it's horrifying, but it's where we're headed if the Culture of Death has its way.

Will we listen to the warning from the Netherlands? Or is it already too late for us?

UPDATE: Through a chain of links, from Townhall.com to Michelle Malkin to Dawn Patrol, I found out who coined the term "post-birth abortion": Shock and Blog. At least, as far as I can tell.

The Amateur Revolution

Rich Glasgow has an interesting post here, about an article titled "Amateur Revolution". According to the author, Charles Leadbeater, amateurs are taking over from the professionals in a number of fields. He calls them "Pro-Ams":

"committed, networked amateurs working to professional standards. Pro-Am workers, their networks and movements, will help reshape society in the next two decades."

Leadbeater lists rap music, astronomy, and banking among the fields being revolutionized by high-achieving amateurs. Rich takes it further, including homeschoolers, home improvement do-it-yourselfers, and bloggers.

Had a little shock of recognition after reading this, realizing that my family fits all three of Rich's categories:

we homeschool, which means we aren't relying on professional educators;

my husband has done virtually all of the work of finishing off the basement himself, including rough carpentry, electrical, and plumbing, only calling in the professionals on the drywall and finish carpentry (partly because of the inordinate time it would take him to do those things); and

we're bloggers. Even out here at the fringes of the blogosphere, we did our part to challenge the MSM professionals (here and here).

Also consider this recent Instapundit post which wonders if we're witnessing the end of capitalism -- in the sense that the means of production are no longer just in the hands of a few wealthy capitalists -- and you get an even clearer picture of the new economy. More evidence for this can be found here, in the stats on the number of self-employed and entrepreneurs.

That's why I think that Bush's emphasis on an "ownership" economy, especially in terms of portable benefits and changes to Social Security, is coming at exactly the right moment in time.

The Blog Slog

Isn't that what this would be?

"The Year of the Beginning of the Long March of Blog"

Do you think "The Year of the Blog Slog" will catch on?

Nah, me neither.

UPDATE: I belatedly added the link to a definition of slog.

Good news from Iraq

The last couple of posts about euthanizing children were so depressing that I really wanted to find something good to post about.

So here's some good news from Iraq, thanks to Chrenkoff, as always.

And on that note, let me beg once again for you all to donate to the Blogger Challenge for the Spirit of America. This is a wonderful organization that will help make many more good things happen in Iraq and Afghanistan.

So (abject begging here) please, please, please, if you stop by this blog once in awhile, or even if you just hit "Next Blog" and came here randomly -- click on those links and consider a nice little donation. Any amount is great, whether $10 or $100 (or $1000!)

And if you do give, please drop a comment here, so as to encourage others to do the same!

Euthanizing Children in the Netherlands

Hugh Hewitt has more on the story I posted about yesterday (didn't have time to write more about it then).

In the Netherlands, they euthanize children according to the "Groningen Protocol". The most frightening part (after the fact that they're actively killing children, obviously): the parents really don't have much to say about it.

How far will this go? How sick do you need to be before the professionals decide you're not worth saving? That you should be put out of your misery?

I hope people find this as appalling as I do. Or have we lost our ability to be outraged by the assaults on the sanctity of human life?

Oh, I just realized that Hugh also posted about this yesterday in more detail, and I find that he, too, is wondering if people will be outraged or not. Read his whole post. He says the blogosphere is quiet about it. Hope it's just because we're tired after Thanksgiving, and not because we're tired of dealing with issues like this one.

More from the Culture of Death

Drudge has this.

Ohio Stolen? Nonsense.

Read this, and send to any of your friends with stolen-election fantasies.

Happy Birthday, Clive

In honor of C.S. Lewis's birthday (on this date in 1898), here's a good article.

I think I'll also begin yet another reading of "Mere Christianity". Was thinking about that book the other day, wondering if I should send it to a friend, not sure if it will still hold up after so many decades of post-modernist damage to the world. Will a modern reader find it hopelessly out of date? Will his examples from a WWII era hold up during a War on Terror era? Will his 19th century chivalry seem to be just sexism in the 21st? Maybe a re-reading will help me decide.

And to our friend "JAS", who also is a huge C.S. Lewis fan, thanks for your comments on this site the other day, here and here.

That's one reason I enjoy blogging: I love people's comments. Usually it's people I know (thanks, honey! And thanks, brothers!) but every so often there's a complete surprise, which is great.

Of course, some people get comments even when they're not blogging at all. Sigh.

Stem Cell Breakthrough -- and it's NOT Fetal Cells

Via Glenn Reynolds, via Pirate's Cove, there's this story about a South Korean woman who is said to be walking again after being paralyzed for 20 years from an accident which injured her back. The cure came from umbilical cord stem cells which were injected directly into the damaged part of her spinal cord.

Key quotes from the article:

So-called "multipotent" stem cells -- those found in cord blood -- are capable of forming a limited number of specialised cell types, unlike the more versatile "undifferentiated" cells that are derived from embroyos.

However, these stem cells isolated from umbilical cord blood have emerged as an ethical and safe alternative to embryonic stem cells.

Clinical trials with embryonic stem cells are believed to be years away because of the risks and ethical problems involved in the production of embryos -- regarded as living humans by some people -- for scientific use.

A question here: What else should we regard them as? Dead humans? Living non-humans?

In contrast, there is no ethical dimension when stem cells from umbilical cord blood are obtained, according to researchers.

Additionally, umbilical cord blood stem cells trigger little immune response in the recipient as embryonic stem cells have a tendency to form tumors when injected into animals or human beings.

Yes, and I posted about this problem previously.

This is very good news, assuming it's replicated by other studies, and I hope it is. Can't help but think that Christopher Reeve died just a couple of years too soon -- and that he was pushing for the wrong kind of stem cell research.

Here's the comment I posted on the above Pirate's Cove link:

Actually, the research done with fetal stem cells has had pretty dismal results so far, unlike that with umbilical cord cells. Some of the research done with fetal cells (in particular, fetal cells transplanted into Parkinson's patients) had absolutely horrifying results, with some patients developing tumors that contained hair and teeth. There really is no legitimate scientific reason to kill human embryos for their stem cells. Since there are good alternatives that pose no thorny moral issues, I think our research money, federal or otherwise, would be best spent on that. I truly hope the story linked above does pan out, and that it can be replicated many times.

Movies

Happened to catch a couple of great ones on TV. (And I mean regular TV, no cable, no satellite, no TiVo. Weird, huh?)

Well, I guess we didn't happen to catch last night's showing of "It's a Wonderful Life". We knew that was coming from the promos on Thanksgiving Day, and so we all got together in the family room at the appointed hour.

I love that movie. I'm not embarrassed to say it's on my Top 10 list. OK, I'm a little embarrassed to say it's probably my all-time favorite movie. I always think that my favorite should be more sophisticated, somehow, or more obscure, or not such a cliched favorite. But -- there it is.

I love everything about that movie. For almost the entire picture, we see George Bailey's dreams being snatched away from him just as they're within his reach. He thinks he's a failure. And then, thanks to the mercy of God, and the kindness of the slightly daffy angel, Clarence, he finds out that he wasn't a failure, but that he was successful beyond his wildest dreams, and that his life had as much meaning, nobilty, and honor as that of any decorated hero or grand adventurer.

And so I cry like a baby every time I see that film. Every. Single. Time. My 14-year-old daughter shoots me a look. "Are you crying, Mom?" Sigh. Yes, I can't help it. It's just so ... beautiful. And the people in that film: they're all just ordinary, regular people -- which makes them all the more heroic. You can tell that Frank Capra loved his characters, with all their quirks and flaws. The spinster at the Savings and Loan who asks for "seventeen dollars and fifty cents, please". Uncle Billy, who just can't help but make a mess of things, bless him. Nowadays we'd want an intervention for him, but Capra just loves him and so do we. And so does George, when he doesn't want to throttle him.

So, we watched, and I cried. A wonderful evening.

Then this morning, I happened to catch some of "Casablanca" and cried some more. Have to quit blogging right now but will try to post about that one later.

(And please click here to donate to the Spirit of America Blogger's Challenge! Remember, as Clarence tells George Bailey, "One man's life touches so many others." Just think how much good you can do with a little donation...)

Welcome, TTLB Visitors!

Hello to everyone stopping by from The Truth Laid Bear! Here's the post about the Friends of Iraq Blogger Challenge. Please, be generous. While it's kind of fun to get a little extra traffic from the link at the top of N.Z.'s page (O.K., it's VERY much fun and it's a LOT of extra traffic), it would be far, far better to raise a ton of money for the Spirit of America.

So if you don't mind, please click on this link to donate as much as you can. It will do a great deal of good. Thanks! (And please come on back once in awhile. My comments link is always open.)

Democracy in Iraq: Chapter One

Great post on Iraq the Model today.

And just a reminder... be sure to read my own post from today to learn about the Spirit of America Bloggers Challenge!

Spirit of America Blogger Challenge

Spirit of America is a terrific organization that is helping to rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan. It started as just an idea in the mind of Jim Hake, and it is now testimony to the power of a good idea and an individual brave enough to see it through.

Here's a quote from the SOA webpage:

Spirit of America was founded by Jim Hake, a businessman who The Los Angeles Times says, "draws on a fundamental faith that his country is trying hard to be all that it aspires to." 9/11 made apparent to him, as with many, that America and the freedoms America symbolizes are at risk. Having benefited from those freedoms and being familiar with the sacrifices of those who have served America, Jim sought an opportunity to contribute.

I've blogged about SOA previously (here). Just look at this list of projects. The beauty of it is that these projects are not just handouts; they're collaborative efforts to help get a country back on its feet, so that the people can become independent.

Now SOA has started a Blogger Challenge to raise money for their next projects. I considered entering as an individual blog, but realized that my little blog wouldn't be able to raise a whole lot on its own. So, I joined a team: TTLB, or, The Truth Laid Bear. This is the site that does the blog ranking system that I find absolutely fascinating; it tracks down all the inbound links and traffic to a blog, and puts it all together in a clever package. (I'm an Adorable Little Rodent, aspiring to move up the food chain.)

Anyway, I am proud to say I was the first blogger to join the TTLB team. (Full disclosure: I admit I was, er, motivated, by TTLB to sign up. The incentive: My blog will be listed at the top of the rankings page, above such Higher Beings as Instapundit and Daily Kos! I'm not worthy...)

So, if you have a little (or a lot) of money left in your charitable donation fund this year, please consider giving to this good cause. Just click here to donate.

If you're a blogger and you want to join this team (remember, your blog also will be listed right above the top-ranked blogs!) click here.

The challenge ends December 15, so don't procrastinate on this one too long! Thank you, thank you.

UPDATE: (11/28) As they say, "Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall". (Yes, I know people always just say "Pride goes before a fall", but that's not the whole verse. Do you want the truth or don't you? Well alrighty, then.)

Anyway. I was bragging about how I was an Adorable Little Rodent in the TTLB Eco System of blog ranking. That lasted all of a minute until N.Z. updated the stats. I've fallen to being a mere Flappy Bird. Well, at least I can console myself that I'm not an Insignificant Microbe.

Yet.

Final Thanksgiving Post

Well, I learned something today. Live-blogging Thanksgiving dinner is a pretty dumb idea. It worked for awhile, but only until everybody arrived and it became, well, Thanksgiving dinner. At that point, obviously, blogging is irrelevant (wait, maybe my blogging is always irrelevant... I better think about that one...) because the guests are there and gravy needs to be made and the turkey carved (thanks, middle brother!) and plates dished up, and then the praying and the eating and the cleaning up afterwards. Oh, and then coffee and pie.

We have a little tradition borrowed from my husband's family, where everybody lights a candle and says what they're thankful for. It's sweet; the kids all say something, and of course it's hard for them to do, sometimes, but they all do it, and are glad of it afterwards. We all have so much to be thankful for. I'm thankful for life itself, for being healthy and able to do my work everyday (and as my little five year old piped up, "And blog!"; she brought down the house with that one) and my family. And more I didn't say, but thought: I'm thankful for our freedom, and for the soldiers who fight to keep us free and safe. I hope they're all home again with their families soon. And I hope that someday, people in Irag, and Darfur, and a hundred other places around the world will be able to sit down to a meal with their families, in freedom and peace.

Live Thanksgiving Blog, Post Three

Everybody's here! And the party is lively; wine is poured, appetizers are being nibbled, there's talking and laughing.

I love Thanksgiving.

Live Thanksgiving Blog, continued...

Post Two:

Husband is up out of the basement; he's ready now. Good thing, because my folks are here, as well as my brother and his family who were the first to arrive.

Doorbell again! It's... my other brother and his family! They're arriving in age-order; first the oldest brother (though they are all younger than me, truth be told), now the "middle one". He's got a lovely wife and four darling kids (one is in the Air Force now).

Yet to arrive is my youngest brother, and my aunt.

More later...

Oh, almost forgot the latest Crisis: The turkey is done!!! It tested done at 3:15, which is about 2 hours too early. Drat.

Live Thanksgiving Blogging??

Well, I considered it.

The turkey's been in the oven since 10:15 a.m. The E.T.D. (Estimated Time of Dinner) is 5:00 p.m. However, my entire family knows that it's often later than the E.T.D. before we finally sit down to eat, so who knows.

So I have a few minutes to blog -- we'll see how far this goes!

First crisis of the day: Turkey (a strapping 26# bird) wouldn't fit in the oven! But before major panic could set it, dear husband realized that we could put in the other rack which would rest a little lower in the oven. Crisis averted.

Second crisis: No candles! Plus, no half-and-half (for after dinner coffee and for adding a splash to the mashed potatoes), no waxed paper, no paper dessert plates in a Thanksgiving theme. So, a quick run to the Jewel. Sadness sets in as I realize I'm too late on the paper plates; all they have left in the Thanksgiving motif are giant dinner plates and cocktail napkins. Sigh. However, managed to find all the other things, plus a bottle of Cabernet Sauvignon (hey, spell checker knows how to spell that; cool!), a bottle of Skyy Vodka (would love Grey Goose but geez, it's twice the price). Oh! And silver polish, to shine up the fancy covered serving dish.

Third crisis: Kids are starting to squabble; too much Thanksgiving anticipation. The little ones get busy cutting up construction paper into make-shift snowflakes, sort of boxy and squarish, in shades of orange and yellow and blue, but cute nonetheless. (It snowed real snow for awhile yesterday -- yahoo! -- but not enough to "stick". So the kids are improvising, I guess.) Oldest and second-oldest daughter are big helps with the picking up and cleaning, setting out the chairs, setting the table, etc. Husband? He helped this morning with polishing and filling up multiple sets of salt and pepper shakers, as well as general assistance as needed (see Crisis #1). But now he's in the basement, working on installing the light switch for the little pantry/storage room.

Whoa -- door bell just rang! It's my brother, his wife, and their daughter. More later...!

Thanksgiving Day Secret

Thanksgiving dinner is incredibly easy to make. Don't let all the food section articles, the turkey hotlines, the local news stories, and the general hype about the meal fool you. It's a no-brainer.

Stick the turkey in the oven, with some stuffing, make the potatoes and some corn. Ask everyone else who's coming to bring all the other stuff.

See? Easy.

Except for the cleanup. Ugh.

(Oh, and if you're reading this and you're one of the people coming tomorrow who's bringing the sweet potatoes, the rolls, the olives, the cranberry chutney, the green bean casserole, or the pies, thanks!)

Thoughts about blogging

The most frequent question that I get about blogging is, "How do you find the time?"

Well that's easy. I don't bake cookies, I don't knit, I don't even read real books anymore. In other words, blogging has become my only hobby. Now, that's not the same as "the only thing I do", obviously, because I still spend my days homeschooling, and I still teach a college class one evening per week, and I still write our homeschool group newsletter. And I worked on the campaign (though not that much, really.) And of course, I'm a mom, so I cook, clean, shop, take care of my little darlings, etc.

But even after dropping all other hobby-type activities, some important things were slipping. Like Christmas prep (here's me the day after the election: "What?!? It's November 3rd? How'd THAT happen?!"), and washing my kitchen floor, and a few other things like that.

So, as you may have noticed, I slowed down considerably on the blogging.

Not some people. Yesterday, Glenn Reynolds apologized for the light blogging -- becaues he'd only posted ten times! Thirteen, if you count the updates. (Ed.: Definitely, count the updates.) OK, 13 times. And he apologized -- he apologized! -- for the "light" blogging because he'd had to drive to Birmingham to pick up his 90-year old grandmother for Thanksgiving.

How does he do it, really?? How does he blog so much, from so many places, on so many topics? With so many photos? Not to mention he's got a real job, other hobbies, and he has a family.

It's pretty clear I'll never be one of the major league bloggers like Glenn.
< sighing > But just when I start to think I might quit entirely, I find out somebody linked to me! Like this guy, Rich Glasgow. I never met him, I don't know who is he, but he made my day yesterday when I discovered he's got me on his blogroll along with Lileks and Hugh and Vodkapundit.

I'm certainly not pretending to be in their league, of course, but it was indeed a thrill to just be listed in the same category.

Anyway, I won't quit blogging because my dear husband tells me I should keep it up. Isn't he sweet? (And by the way, honey, when are you going to do that guest blogger post you keep promising?)

Oprah: The Goddess of Consumer Culture

Oprah's on right now, so I'm watching while I'm picking up and cleaning the family room. Mostly I'm listening to Oprah, and mostly what I hear is screaming, clapping, crying, shrieking, gasping.

Why? Because it's Oprah's "Favorite Things for Christmas" show. The women in the audience - and they're all women, all teachers, in fact - are scaring me a little. They are weeping, shaking, screaming. Some seem about to pass out. Others are jumping up and down wildly. They can't believe their good fortune -- they are gettings lots and lots of really expensive stuff, free! From Oprah!!!

Their reaction seems a little out of proportion, really. I would think that kind of reaction would be saved for something major. You know, a life and death issue. Maybe if I was in that audience, I'd be caught up in all the excitement, too.

But I think the real reason for the hysteria is because they LOVE Oprah. Love loveloveLOVE her. She's an American pop culture goddess. She's beautiful, she's lost weight, she's stylish, she never looks a day older, she gives a bunch of money to deserving causes. She's the great American success story. She overcame a very difficult childhood of abuse and poverty and never claims victimhood. She can switch from standard middle class English to black girlfriend-ese in a flash. She's funny, she's warm, she emotes. She tears up when people say touching things. She likes books. She has a steady boyfriend, but doesn't "need" to marry. She's wildly famous and yet completely down-to-earth. She's the richest woman in America (the world?), but she's not pretentious. She's powerful, but not arrogant.

And that's why the crowd always goes absolutely insane when she walks out at the start of every show, even if it's not a "Favorite Things" edition.

UPDATE: The second comment below asks if Oprah gives the things away out of her own pocket or if it's donated by the companies. Definitely the latter. It's huge publicity and goodwill for them.

Interestingly, here's a story about a local guy, Tim Cuprisin, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel TV/radio critic, who got a phone call from Oprah -- because he wrote an article only slightly critical of her "Favorite Things" show. His take was a little similar to mine, in that the screaming/crying/fainting stuff is a bit much, and he also mentioned that the show ends up being one huge hour-long commercial. Today he was interviewed on local TV; he said that he also objects to the greediness of the whole spectacle. Like I said, if I was there, I'd probably be just as excited to get all that cool stuff. I'd like to think I'd also be considering who I would share it with. I hope.

A post from Iraq

Read. Discuss.

Please.

The left: Just so doggone nice.

Lately I've posted on the "Roe Effect" (James Taranto's term), which says that the number of liberal voters is shrinking because of abortion, and the "Roe Effect Corollary" (my term), which says women who've had abortions often have a change of heart and become pro-life.

Attila then commented that people who support abortion have smaller families because they just don't want as many children.

All of these things would, at least theoretically, lead to a smaller number of liberal-leaning voters.

And all of this discussion happened without any meanness or name-calling. Very polite.

Well.

Yesterday I was visiting some liberal blogs, trying to learn more about why some liberals think we're headed toward a theocracy headed up by George W. Bush. Will post about that later.

Anyway, I came across this site. The "Texas Taliban"? Puh-leeeeze. Do these people have any idea what the real Taliban was like? Obviously not.

But the killer comment on the post (which was about an effort in Texas to clean up text books filled with left wing propaganda) was this one:

"Of course, part of the reason intellegent (sic) people are becoming uncommon is because it is the people with the reduced capacity for intellegence that multiply since they are the ones ignorant of overpopulation."

Nice, isn't it? First, some advice for this guy: It helps your argument about who's intelligent and who isn't if you can spell "intelligent" correctly. Second, the whole argument is just so Margaret Sanger. But there's more from a later commenter:

"Yeah, there’s a point. Non-religious couples, in my experience, generally tend to have one or two children, or even none at all, while professional Catholic/Jewish/Muslim housewives/doormats are quite happy to punch out 6-7 of the little tykes in quick succession."

The trifecta: An insult to my intelligence, my religion, and my chosen occupation all in one fell swoop.

The left is ultimately intolerant, and very quickly gets nasty (note some of their pre-election acts of desperation), while those on the right can afford to be tolerant because they know they're on the side of truth. Here's what Dennis Prager, a Jew, says about it:

"I have found over and over that most Christians who preach faith are more tolerant than most leftists who preach tolerance."

Here's an interesting thing about the blogger from the site quoted earlier. He proudly says he's an atheist, and then says, while musing about some prehistoric skeletal remains:

"One of the nice things about being an atheist is that I get to reserve all of my awe for the things that warrant it…and the face of one of our distant cousins from 13 million years ago certainly deserves deep reverence."

I've heard people say that if you don't worship God, you'll worship something else. Certainly applies in this guy's case.

It's sad though, that he thinks some old bones are more worthy of reverence than the God who made them.

A "Roe Effect Corollary"

On Monday I posted about the "Roe Effect", thanks to an email from my husband's friend. (Thanks, J.!)

I think there might be a corollary to the Roe Effect: That a significant number of women who have abortions become strongly pro-life afterwards. This would be another reason that, ironically, legalized abortion may be contributing to more conservative voting patterns in the U.S.

The most famous example of this "Roe Effect Corollary" would be Norma McCorvey, the "Jane Roe" of the 1973 case that made abortion legal. In 1995, Norma converted to Christianity and became a staunch pro-life advocate. In 1998, she was received into the Catholic Church. Today she has a website dedicated to the pro-life cause.

Norma never actually had an abortion herself (the case was decided long after she gave birth to a baby girl, who was given up for adoption), but she feels partly responsible for the millions of abortions since 1973 due to her participation as lead plaintiff in the case.

Another type of post-abortion conversion is sometimes experienced by abortion providers, such as Dr. Bernard Nathanson. He was at the forefront of the abortion "rights" movement until he had a change of heart and realized that he had, as he put it, "presided over the murder of thousands of babies". He went on to make the movie "The Silent Scream". Dr. Nathanson also converted to Catholicism in 1996. Click here for additional testimony from doctors and nurses who changed their minds about abortion.

Click here for results of a survey conducted by a pro-life group. The most interesting statistics: Before the abortion, only 26% of the women said they thought the fetus was human; after the abortion, 97% believed it was human. Also, before the abortion, 33% of the women had a "very negative" view of abortion; afterwards, that figure jumped to 98%.

Part of this could be explained by cognitive dissonance. Before a planned abortion, a woman might find it difficult to admit to herself that the fetus was human, since that would make justifying the abortion much more difficult. (However, note that over 1/4 of the women in this study did, in fact, believe the fetus was human, even before the abortion.)

But in addition to the cognitive dissonance factor, women often suffer post-abortion guilt and pain, which may lead them to rethink their views on abortion. Or perhaps they are simply able to drop their defenses and denial, and finally admit that abortion does indeed stop a beating heart.

There is no joy in these statistics, of course. It's just such a sad situation for all involved.

Here's information on Project Rachel, which provides help to women who are suffering after having an abortion.

Red States and Abortion: some data

About a week ago, I posted on "Why the Far Left Will Become Extinct". It was conjecture based on a comment I read in the Chicago Tribune.

Well, today a good friend of my husband's emailed him a link that buttresses that post. Apparently, James Taranto over at Best of the Web has written about this before, and calls it "The Roe Effect".

Here's a quote from one of his articles on the topic:

Not all women, after all, are equally likely to have abortions. It's almost a truism that women who have abortions are more pro-choice than those who carry their pregnancies to term, and it stands to reason that they generally have more-liberal attitudes about sex and religion. It also seems reasonable to assume that parents have some influence on their children, so that if liberal women are having abortions, the next generation will be more conservative than it otherwise would be.

The article linked above supports the argument with data on the abortion rate and ratio in Red vs. Blue States.

Many thanks to my husband's friend for the link. I hadn't read Taranto's work before, and I should have.

Still, this seems like one of those arguments that you almost hate to be right about. It's just so sad to think of the 40 million people who aren't here, because of Roe v. Wade.

Euthanasia and the Pro-Life Movement

Pro-lifers predicted decades ago that if abortion was legalized, euthanasis surely would follow. Read this chilling article to see just where that path leads. Now that the election is over, we should all give a little thought to how we can best spend our energy advancing the pro-life argument. Being informed about euthanasia is a good first step.

Veteran's Day

Called a former co-worker today; he's a veteran of the Korean War, a Marine. I try to call him every year on Veteran's Day to thank him for serving our country.

Said a prayer for my uncle, who fought in some horrific battles in WWII. He rarely discussed it with any of us, but he did open up to my husband a few years after we were married. My uncle died three years ago. We had his funeral Mass on the night of September 11, 2001.

Thought of my nephew, who joined the Air Force in March of 2003. His dad drove him to the bus station to leave for basic training about two days before the invasion of Iraq, if I recall correctly. He's now stationed in Dover, but he and his sweet young wife will be leaving for Spain sometime next year.

And then I came across this, on Hugh Hewitt's site, and it made me cry. It's about a heroic young man who was killed in Iraq last spring, giving his life for others. Here's an excerpt:

We are left to wonder why it is so often those that are so great, that live with such nobility, are the ones to die. The answer is that, because of their nobility and greatness, they are the first to volunteer. It is often the better people who end up giving their lives for others.

Please, go and read the whole thing, and then say a prayer for our soldiers in Fallujah right now, and if you can, call any veterans you know to thank them.

Some crowing, and a small serving of crow, please.

Time to 'fess up about my election predictions, just to keep myself honest. I know that everyone's pretty much done with talking about the election, but I never had a chance to do this, and since I hate leaving loose ends lying around, here goes:

This was my prediction from the very first post on this blog: I predicted a "landslide win for W."

And here's what I said as the election got closer:

"I'm sticking with my prediction of an Electoral landslide for Bush, with him getting over 310 Electoral College votes. As far as popular vote, I'm going with Bush 52%, Kerry 47%."

Off by a couple of states in the E.C., because I was sure Bush would win Wisconsin (10), New Hampshire (4), and one other Midwestern state. But I was pretty close on the popular vote! (Back patting, back patting...)

I was wrong on these two predictions:

"I'm also predicting that Bush will take Wisconsin as part of that landslide, and that Senator Feingold can kiss his Senate seat good-bye."

Oops.

I guess this part of that post was right: "This could be entirely wishful thinking on my part."

I also predicted voter turnout:

"My prediction: definitely over 65%, maybe edging toward 70%."

Well, I was wrong. CNN says just under 60% of registered voters showed up on election day. I can take comfort in knowing that almost everyone else was wrong, too, including those who predicted massive young voters this time (it was the same as last time).

I was told, however, by a clerk in City Hall, that my city had a 97% turnout. I had to ask her to repeat that, because I could hardly believe that was correct.

I will also do a little back-patting for that, because I was one of the thousands of Waukesha volunteers helping to turn out the vote, going door-to-door with a friend, making phone calls, talking to almost everyone about the election.

Here's something I'll always remember: Those personal contacts helped convince two brand-new voters to get out and vote for Bush. One was a neighbor who said she simply never voted. Another was my hairdresser, who had never registered to vote. This time, she and her husband both voted for Bush.

Let's remember that for the next election: It is possible to persuade people to vote through personal, one-on-one contacts.

I'm glad I was wrong about this prediction:

"The Democrats are going to pull something awful later this week, most likely Friday."

I thought they might come up with some big lie, about Bush's personal life, at the last minute. They didn't, to their credit. Besides, MSM had already tried to help them out, with Rathergate, and then the allegations of missing explosives. Not to mention all the free passes for Kerry on his Senate record, his military service, etc.

But I can crow a little bit, because my popular vote prediction was closer than Ray C. Fair's, the Yale Econ professor. He predicted that Bush would get 57.5& of the popular vote. That would have been nice.

And not only can I crow, but I can cheer, whoop, and holler, because I was also closer than Eric Alterman of Slate (hap tip Instapundit), who predicted a Kerry landslide.

Is it too late to do a little more gloating?

Red States, Blue States, I-share-with-you States

There's a lot of talk lately about the differences between Red States and Blue States. For example, lefties are saying they're smarter than conservatives, and have even tried to compare average IQ scores between the states.

I think these sorts of comparisons are pretty worthless, because you have no way of knowing who, in a given state, actually voted for Kerry vs. who actually voted for Bush. Even in many Blue States, as much as 45% of the population voted for Bush. So even if you find that Blue States have a higher average IQ than Red States, who's to say it wasn't the upper end of the IQ scale in any given state that voted for Bush?

But if we're going to do broad-brush comparisons, here's a good one.

Guess which states are the most generous in charitable contributions? Come on, guess. Would it be the states where people like John Kerry and Hilary Clinton live, people who are always preaching about "giving back" and "fair share" and all that? Would it be the states where the lefties say all the smart people live?

Nope, it wouldn't. It would be the Red States.

Here's the link to the Chicago Tribune article I happened to read this afternoon.

The most generous state of all: Mississippi. This is really kind of touching, because Mississippi ranks dead last in average per capita income, but is 5th in average per capita charitable donations. The difference between the two ranks (50th and 5th) is 45, which is the biggest gap of any state, and that gets Mississippi ranked first on the Generosity Index.

The rank ordering of states is pretty astonishing, actually, because you have to read all the way down to the 26th state to find even one Blue State, which happens to be New York. New York is ranked 5th in per capita income, and 9th in average giving.

It strikes me as significant that the top half of the Generosity Index is filled with Red States. You wanna know the bottom five? Minnesota, Wisconsin (sad to say, because it's my own state), New Jersey, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire.

Funny, the Chicago Tribune article never commented on that.

Tin Foil Hat Time

Conspiracy theories abound. The election was stolen! Phantom votes were cast for Bush! Democrats thought they were voting for Kerry but the machines tricked them into voting for Bush instead!

Now, that last one is a little too close to this joke that was circulating around the internet before the election.

But after hanging around over at Daily Kos I never cease to be amazed at the ridiculous things believe will say and believe. What do you expect from people who watched "Fahrenheit 911" and believed it?

I also think this is what you can expect from people who feel powerless. They can't understand how they could have lost so big (and by "big" I don't just mean the margin of the Presidential victory in an election with historic turnout, I mean all the Senate and House seats, too, as well as a majority of governorships and State legislatures). They can't accept the fact that their candidate was awful, and that the campaign was horribly run, as this August timeline shows. Click here for links for the blow-by-blow account of how not to run a campaign, August through October.

Combine all that with the fact that the economy was doing extremely well, we are at war (a war that is actually going pretty well), and the President himself is a pretty likeable guy, and you have more than enough reason to predict a Bush victory. In fact, I have to wonder why it wasn't a complete landslide.

But a lot of the Dems aren't looking at the facts. They have gone beyond rationality into a nutty altered reality, a hall of mirrors where all they see are faces like theirs, dumbfounded at the smacking they got in the polls. They are primed, by Michael Moore's wacky conspiracy theories and outright lies, to believe any crazy theory that comes along. They're also primed by 30 years of listening only to the sound of their own voices in mainstream media and Hollywood to believe that it's impossible for a majority of Americans to actually want to elect George W. Bush. Therefore, anyone who did vote for him must be a) stupid or b) deluded.

Actually, there are two more options: they're c) evil former slaveholders or d) Bible-thumpin' theocrats. I'll write more about those options later.

Here's a link to the ABC story that aired last night, pretty much scoffing at the conspiracy theories.

I just wish that this sort of story, as well as this one, and this one, and this one (hat tip to Instapundit for the links) would make all the nuts and their Tin Foil Hat theories go away, but they won't, of course.

And to think that before the election, Kerry and the lefties were saying that we were the ones not dealing with reality! HA.