Arrogance Makes Me Mad.
Me: Bottom-of-the-pile user account administrator and all-round slave.
Luser: Jumped up little prat who thinks his opinion is more important than anyone else's, just because he runs his own little office in the middle of nowhere.
It's nearly the end of the month, which means tons of people's temporary user accounts are starting to expire. When accounts get close to being disabled, thevictim user receives emails asking them to complete an Amend form and return to IS so we can give them access to the network for a bit longer.
A form came in yesterday for a user. In the section asking how long to extend the account for, Luser had written 2015.
WTF? Yeah, like I'm gonna extend your account for EIGHT FREAKING YEARS. These are temporary accounts, so we have no way of tracing when the lusers leave the organisation because they're not through the payroll department. This is why we give them temporary accounts. This is why we disable the accounts after a given amount of time. EIGHT YEARS? How can anyone be so arrogant as to assume that their staff will still be working for them in 8 years?!
I sent Luser an email, explaining I'd extended the account until the end of tax year, which is as far as I'm allowed to go, and then actually took the time to explain the security policy to him. Then I went to lunch.
When I got back, Luser had:
1/ left me a ranting voicemail so long that he got cut off by the machine before he'd finished
2/ sent me an email saying "xx has worked with us for 20 years. What possible security risk could she present?! You need to rethink this policy. "
*rolls eyes dramatically* Yeah. Like I wrote the policy. And I did it specifically to piss you off.
I fancied getting into a sparring match with Luser, but forced myself to take the high road - by escalating directly to my manager, head of Security, who sent a very succint email explaining that this wasn't personal and could Luser please get off his high horse and understand we have to follow policies in order to avoid complete network anarchy?
I'm just so appalled that anyone thinks their personal trust in a member of staff is to be favoured over good practice and security measures. What a tosser.
Luser: Jumped up little prat who thinks his opinion is more important than anyone else's, just because he runs his own little office in the middle of nowhere.
It's nearly the end of the month, which means tons of people's temporary user accounts are starting to expire. When accounts get close to being disabled, the
A form came in yesterday for a user. In the section asking how long to extend the account for, Luser had written 2015.
WTF? Yeah, like I'm gonna extend your account for EIGHT FREAKING YEARS. These are temporary accounts, so we have no way of tracing when the lusers leave the organisation because they're not through the payroll department. This is why we give them temporary accounts. This is why we disable the accounts after a given amount of time. EIGHT YEARS? How can anyone be so arrogant as to assume that their staff will still be working for them in 8 years?!
I sent Luser an email, explaining I'd extended the account until the end of tax year, which is as far as I'm allowed to go, and then actually took the time to explain the security policy to him. Then I went to lunch.
When I got back, Luser had:
1/ left me a ranting voicemail so long that he got cut off by the machine before he'd finished
2/ sent me an email saying "xx has worked with us for 20 years. What possible security risk could she present?! You need to rethink this policy. "
*rolls eyes dramatically* Yeah. Like I wrote the policy. And I did it specifically to piss you off.
I fancied getting into a sparring match with Luser, but forced myself to take the high road - by escalating directly to my manager, head of Security, who sent a very succint email explaining that this wasn't personal and could Luser please get off his high horse and understand we have to follow policies in order to avoid complete network anarchy?
I'm just so appalled that anyone thinks their personal trust in a member of staff is to be favoured over good practice and security measures. What a tosser.
