For guitar master Kevin Eubanks’ 68th birthday, a profile in Jazziz from 2010

No master of hardcore jazz expression — not Herbie Hancock, Chick Corea or Keith Jarrett, not Pat Metheny or John McLaughlin, not Wynton or Branford Marsalis, not Joshua Redman or Brad Mehldau, not even Harry Connick, Jr. — boasts a higher Q-score than Kevin Eubanks. This became evident last spring from the mainstream media dish that followed the guitarist’s announcement that he would leave The Tonight Show after an 18-year run, the last 14 spent as Jay Leno’s bandleader and sidekick.

Augmenting boilerplate coverage in the jazz trades and a New York Times overview of Eubanks’ oeuvre was an interview in the “Walter Scott” column in Parade, the 75-million circulation Sunday newspaper supplement. Speculation and snark on Eubanks’ motives and intentions ran in supermarket tabloids Entertainment Weekly and Us Weekly, showbiz insider pubs Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and Hollywoodnews.com; and e-gossip sites Gawker and “Perez Hilton.” Celebritynetworth.com cited an annual $5 million salary and a $25 million personal net worth. Much coverage parsed the Leno-Eubanks relationship, codified in a five-minute “best-of” roast that aired on Eubanks’ final Tonight Show episode, including a middle-schoolish bit on which Eubanks was tricked into referencing his “tiny member,” a clip in which he denies ever masturbating in a tree, and a vignette that showed Eubanks, a vegetarian who occasionally eats fish, paying off a lost wager by eating a corn dog previously licked on camera by actor and former Los Angeles Laker Rick Fox.

Branford Marsalis, who hired his Berklee College classmate when he became the Tonight Show bandleader in 1992, had found it impossible to tolerate such antics, leaving in 1996 to concentrate full-time on jazz and classical music performance. On the other hand, Eubanks — whose political views can be inferred from a Twitter reference to “Republiklans” — was able to compartmentalize, and he fulfilled his middlebrow responsibilities with an unfailingly unflappable smile while devoting off-hours to maintaining the high level of artistic production that had characterized his activity before his celebrity years.

“It was a corporate job,” Eubanks explains patiently over the phone from his Malibu home. “A not-so-traditional corporate job, but still corporate. Nobody held a gun to my head — or anyone in the band — to do this. I had to learn how to get from Point A to Point B, and as I got smarter and more aware, things got easier and better. You don’t take things personally, because it’s just the way things are in a corporate situation. I had a job to do, and I knew the show’s demographic was basically a classic-rock audience. I like the Stones and Zeppelin. I like Sly and the Family Stone and Aretha Franklin. We played those songs great. All these delineations between one thing and another are false. I never impugned anything I was doing before.”

There would have been scant reason to do so. At the time he arrived in Los Angeles, Eubanks had carved a niche as an immediately identifiable guitar voice — he eschews a pick to allow him greater harmonic flexibility, without sacrificing precision of execution in his attack — within various dialects of jazz expression. As a GRP recording artist, he became best-known for well-crafted “smooth jazz” dates that sold in the high five figures, but he also played hardbop with Art Blakey, Slide Hampton and Roy Haynes; chamber jazz with New York piano professors like James Williams, Kirk Lightsey and Ronnie Matthews; free-form improv with Sam Rivers; audaciously contrapuntal, groove-rich songs in Dave Holland’s visionary quartet with alto saxophonist Steve Coleman and drummer Marvin “Smitty” Smith; and — with the latter two musicians, as well as Gary Thomas and trombonist Robin Eubanks, his older brother — hybrid projects under the aegis of Brooklyn’s post-funk M-Base scene, on which he skronked out and played unplugged with equal authority. Over the years, he honed a style that blended jazz vocabulary — he’s refracted, in a highly sophisticated way, the dialects of Charlie Christian, T-Bone Walker, Oscar Moore, Wes Montgomery, Jim Hall, John McLaughlin and Ralph Towner, among others — with Euro-classical, flamenco, blues, Indian and multiple African lexicons.

On three Blue Note studio dates recorded between 1992 and 1994, Eubanks coalesced these flavors into a mature compositional voice, steamy and contemplative, adding flute and trombone to the front line and deploying Holland and Smith or Charnett Moffett with either Gene Jackson or Mark Mondesir to propel the flow. For most of his fan base, the Blue Notes and the contemporaneously released World Trio [Intuition], an elegant session with Holland and percussionist Minu Cinelu, were the last sighting of the guitarist at his unmediated best.

That changed in November, when Mack Avenue released Zen Food, which features Bill Pierce on saxophone, Gerry Etkins on piano, Rene Camacho on bass and Smith on drums, Eubanks’ band-of-choice for weekend flyaway and vacation-time gigs at rooms like Yoshi’s and Blues Alley. Somewhat more swing-oriented than its ’90s predecessors, it’s an exceptionally accomplished, energetic date that reflects both the high-gloss professionalism and creative abilities of the first-call personnel. “Smitty and I have a heavy jazz background from when we moved to New York,” Eubanks says. “But we also intensely love electric music from the ‘70s when Fusion was something new, before people started turning it into a technical exercise, and playing loud and fast and furious. Fusion was in our present, we breathed the same air at the same time, and you can feel that pure fusion energy on Zen Food.”

BREAK

Most admirers for whom Eubanks was a nightly presence in their late-night rituals know nothing, and could care less, about his hardcore jazz bona fides.

Which perhaps is why, over the course of our conversation, Eubanks launched several unprompted soliloquies disputing the notion that Zen Food, which wears its erudition lightly, denotes some sort of radical break from his post Blue Note discography. “It’s not like I decided to dust off the guitar, start putting the band together, and record for Mack Avenue,” he states with beleaguered asperity. “There’s the insinuation that I’m somehow coming back to what I used to do, like a retro musical trend. I have no intention of going back to anything. We’ve been playing this music on the road for years, and Zen Food is the latest of several records I’ve made during my time here. If Mack Avenue hadn’t contacted me, I’d have put it out on iTunes.”

To be specific, Eubanks’ download-only imprint, Insoul, comprises six dates, all from the aughts, and recorded or post-produced in the fully equipped home studio that he built from Tonight Show earnings, Each explores a different facet of his interests. On Shrine, Eubanks, Pierce and the late pianist James Williams — cusp-of-the-’80s bandmates in the Jazz Messengers— join iconic drummer Billy Higgins in an informed, swinging session, while on Slow Freight Eubanks and his uncle, pianist Ray Bryant, offer a recital of blues- and soul-infused jazz. Genesis, which is all-acoustic, finds Eubanks and Pierce addressing modern hymns and spirituals from a harmonically advanced perspective. A similarly contemplative feeling comes forth on Angel, a suite for solo and overdubbed acoustic guitars that would not sound out of place on ECM; on Soweto Sun, Eubanks, Pierce and Smith, in trio, evoke quiet-storm intensity. Eubanks launched the label in 2001 with Live, an expansive location date with deep grooves, much melody and counterpoint, and abundant soloistic derring-do.

Asked why he didn’t publicize this strong, cohesive corpus, which, he acknowledges, “nobody has heard,” Eubanks responds: “I come from a school where you tour behind a record, which I couldn’t do while I was on The Tonight Show. Mack Avenue figured that I could now support Zen Food by going on the road, which is exactly what I want to do.”

He adds that non-jazz projects — among them, he cites collaborations with Nashville writers and five film scores — are a few of the “situations that probably will represent where the music goes in the future more than this record.” Again, Eubanks anticipates criticism and preempts it.

“It seems that the more interest you have in different things, the less seriously people take you, as though you can’t be excellent at any one of them,” he says. “The fact that people have heard me play jazz more than anything else may make it difficult for them to accept it when I explore other things. But The Tonight Show changed me. I’m way more into country music. And although I always liked bluegrass, now I like it way more, and I’d love to explore its connection with jazz. If I’m playing with a bluegrass artist, I’m representing the same work ethic, the same sensibility. I want to get greatat it. I would love to find a bluegrass player or a very progressive hip-hop musician who has been somewhat successful and create something together with the same sensibilities.”

Has Eubanks impacted the evolution of guitar language? “Maybe within a very small area,” he replies. “Maybe the guitar community would take me more seriously had I not been on TV for 18 years. That’s just how life is. But maybe it’s just in my mind. Maybe I’m paranoid about that.”

BREAK

During a two-hour conversation, Eubanks used different tenses of the verb “to learn” 35 separate times, as in, “I’m taking what I’ve learned at The Tonight Show and moving forward.” The lessons were wide-ranging.

One was to apply bandstand principles to his role in Leno’s nightly front-of-show monologue with Leno. “It was a comedic conversation between opposites,” he states. “But we trusted each other onstage. I was comping in support of his monologue, giving it energy without overtaking it, like when I play duets with Smitty or comp behind Bill Pierce.”

The imperative of enfolding individual skills within a collective context is key to his thought process. “Generally. my gig was to make everything better within my department and infuse that into the show — playing with other bands, choosing music, keeping the musicians mindful of professionalism and work ethic in a corporate situation,” Eubanks says. “The music is the web that connects everything, keeps the show moving. What will complement the comedy skit? If an audience member does something weird, can the music help turn it into comedy? Say Colin Powell was coming on. Can I find out from his aide what’s his favorite song? OK, it was a calypso. We found a tape, learned it, and surprised him by playing it when he came out.”

Others advised Eubanks on performance techniques. Arsenio Hall suggested he approach even the most familiar material as a first encounter; Regis Philbin reminded him to be intimate with the camera.

“I’ve met so many people who’ve embraced me, who feel they know me because I was in their living room every night,” Eubanks says. “On stage I try to convey that we’re company, so let’s be at ease and have a sense of humor about ourselves. That doesn’t conflict with making good music.” Such Tonight Show visitors as Willie Nelson, B.B. King and Buddy Guy, and various actor friends “don’t make a big deal of what they do on screen or stage; there’s a real person there.” He continues: “If people like you, they’ll generally be open to what you do.”

In March, the Thelonious Monk Institute appointed Eubanks Artistic Director for their Jazz in the Classroom program, with a mandate to work with aspirants in the public high schools of Los Angeles. (Eubanks reports that in 2011 he will visit Chicago and Philadelphia, his home town.)

“I stress sharing the workload, tutoring each other, working for people in your community, organizing fundraisers,” he says. “I want all the departments in the school to engage in this common purpose of putting together a song in an hour-and-a-half. I want dancers to make a dance for it. Lead vocalist, go to the horns, and learn the melody. Background singers, make up background horn parts. Artists, render everything that happens. At the end, everything coheres, and it’s become bigger than the sum of the parts, as I learned very well at The Tonight Show. You can take that work ethic anywhere, and prosper.”

He acknowledges that logistics make it difficult for Los Angeles jazzfolk to follow communital principles — jamming together, doing sessions, or walking, as is customary in New York, from one club to another. “That doesn’t mean that people aren’t just as serious,” Eubanks says. ALos Angeles is a production town filled with hard-working people who came here to be part of something bigger, professionals who network and do projects that go all over the world. After a while, your address book contains people other than musicians — a phone call could get you a jingle, it does well, and one thing leads to another. If you approach L.A. with preconceptions, you can talk yourself out of what’s really there.”

One aspiration is to conceptualize and shoot a pilot of a cooking show, perhaps pegging it to the Zen Food message by focusing on healthy eating for the over-45 set. But he isn’t in a rush. “People get this impression that in L.A. you snap your fingers and something happens,” he says. “But I’ve learned in Hollywood that it’s a big process from getting it off the drawing board to having someone look at it, buy it, and put it out. You need to market yourself, and it doesn’t happen overnight.

“The same thing applies to music. Don’t cater to a commercial audience, don’t change whatever you’re doing. But respect the fact that it’s not going to sell itself.”

1 Comment

Filed under Jazziz, Kevin Eubanks

RIP Jim McNeely (May 18th, 1949 – September 26th, 2025): An uncut Downbeat Blindfold Test from September 2015

Image
Image
Image
Image

Social media is chock-a-block with testimonies and appreciations for Jim McNeely, a great pianist, a brilliant composer and arranger whose ideas influenced several generations, but also a gifted educator and treasured mentor. Go to these thorough interviews by Ethan Iverson (https://ethaniverson.com/interviews/interview-with-jim-mcneely/) and Ronan Guilfoyle (https://ronanguil.blogspot.com/2009/09/jim-mcneely-on-composition-interview.html) for McNeely’s personal narrative. Iverson’s obituary appears on McNeely’s website. (https://jim-mcneely.com/)

I knew maestro McNeely professionally — he joined me several times on WKCR during the 1990s and 2000s, and I interviewed him in 2018 for Phil Woods’ autobiography, three years after he agreed to do the Downbeat Blindfold Test with me. Then 66, he opted to come to my place in Brooklyn from his New Jersey home via commuter bus and subway. I gave him contemporary material to listen to, and his remarks were trenchant and detailed in a way that could not be fully captured in a single page in DownBeat’s September 2015 issue. So I’m pleased to be able to offer a transcript of the complete proceedings below.

Nick Levinovsky, “In This World” (#9) (Special Opinion, Butman Music, 2013) (Levinovsky, Fender Rhodes, composer; Moscow State Jazz Orchestra: Igor Butman, Dmitry Mospan, Danny Walsh, Alexander Dovgopoly, saxophones; Pavel Zhlin, Denis Popov, Alexander Bernson, Alexander Sakharov, trumpets; Alevtina Polyakova, Oleg Borodin, Pavel Ovchinnikov, trombones, Nikolay Shevnin, bass trombone; Tom Kennedy, electric bass; Dave Weckl, drums)

That was well played. It impressed me as a really good, interesting arrangement of a tune that was a little predictable. We hear an awful lot of DAH-DUH-DAH, DAH-DUH-DAH in there. But the contrast in the tune with the middle section where it has more of a walking feel and eighth note thing was a nice contrast. I thought it got most interesting after the piano solo. The Fender Rhodes solo sounded fine. I’m curious as to whether the pianist is also the leader on the date. I thought either he was or the soprano sax player was, because the soprano was kind of hot in the mix. The mix I thought was a little artificial. I tend to like a mix that sounds like you’re recording the band in a room and not so much tweaking of the balance that they did here. But it’s a solid arrangement, and the band played really well. The lead player sounded really good. 4 stars. [After] Yeah, I know Nick. For this kind of thing, Dave is a great drummer to get. It was solid and played well. It was good. I got to know Nick a little bit when he was living in New York. He brought a few things in either to Mel’s band or the early days of the Vanguard Orchestra. There were one or two of his things in the book. I don’t know if we ever really played them, but I did get to know him a little bit back some time ago.

Lee Konitz-Ohad Talmor Big Band, “June ’05” (Portology, Omnitone, 2007) (Konitz, alto saxophone; Talmor, conductor, arranger; Orquestra Jazz de Matoshinos)

Is that Lee Konitz? Lee’s sound is so dark now, very rich and full. Of course, he has always been a very lyrical player. The piece wanders around, and almost feels like it ends about three different times, then it picks up again. So I’m not sure how successful the piece is. There are some really nice individual moments with the writing. One thing that struck me was the way it starts has some promise to it, but it doesn’t follow through all the way. It gets much more conventional in certain spots. Whoever wrote this I think was of two minds. He wanted to write a piece that expressed some of his compositional ideas, but he thought, “Well, I also have to make sure Lee can play on this.” I thought some of the background stuff was a little too much behind Lee, even though the brass were muted and it tends to be woodwinds and so forth. But I thought all the background stuff behind Lee could be thinned out by at least about half, just to let the darkness of his sound predominate a little more. Is that Oh…the guy who has written some things for him…I’m forgetting… [Ohad Talmor] Yes. He’s a good composer. [The composition comes from Lee’s playing. He practices, then transcribes it, and sends it to Ohad...] So those are some of Lee’s lines. Well, it’s a great idea. Was that recorded in New York, or was that the Portuguese orchestra, Matosinhos? [Yes.] I’ve worked with them, and they’re very good, and really good guys, and I admire what they’re doing. I’m not sure how successful this piece is just because it seemed like he was trying to get a lot of ideas in there, as many as he could, and the whole thing could have been thinned out and shortened, and it might work a little bit better. 3 stars. Lee’s… As with a lot of people… Dizzy once said it took him years to learn what not to play. I think of a guy like Cootie Williams; by the end of his career he had about 6 notes on the horn that he could use, and they were great, and he played the hell out of the trumpet. With Lee, it seems everything is slower, but more rich, more direct I guess is the word. I think with Lee now we hear somebody who has been doing it for God knows how many years… [70] Yeah. That’s how long he=s been playing, not alive but playing. And he’s finally figured out, “I’ve filtered out a lot of this stuff,” and every note has got this depth and meaning to it. I think it=s beautiful. At first, when the alto solo starts, about 4 or 5 people came to mind right away, and then I heard the lines he was playing, and I thought, “That’s Lee Konitz,” but it’s not the Lee Konitz that we’ve known 20-30-40 years ago, but it’s dark and rich like a really strong, roast cup of coffee. Lee sounds great. I think it’s so important when you’re writing for somebody, to create a setting where the solo is still a predominant voice. I thought here a lot of it, because of the rhythmic writing in the backgrounds…it was long and sustained, and tended to get in the way of Lee. One reason I’m saying this is this is stuff I used to do in my writing that I realized after a while doesn’t work, so I’ve tried to cut it out of my own stuff.

SFJAZZ Collective, “Spain” (The Music of Chick Corea and New Compositions, SFJAZZ, 2013) (Edward Simon, piano, arranger; Avishai Cohen, trumpet (solo); Robin Eubanks, trombone; Miguel Zenón, alto saxophone; David Sánchez, tenor saxophone; Stefon Harris, vibraphone; Matt Penman, bass; Obed Calvaire, drums)

That was good. “Spain “ when Chick first recorded it, and I was a lot younger, and so many of us at that time, it was our goal to learn the tune and play it as fast as we could, especially that big unison section. So when I heard the intro, I thought, “Ok, how are they going to treat this?” I liked the way the tempo in the beginning was very different. It was a nice surprise to hear it played that way, and then it got back to the slower thing at the end. The playing sounds really good. I wasn’t sure if that’s Chick on piano or not. When I first heard the vibes and the piano, it didn’t quite sound like Chick, and I thought, well, this is kind of like the hologram of the Gary Burton-Chick Corea duo — it’s them but it’s not them. It’s supposed to be that THING, but it wasn’t that. The piano player has a lot of Chick’s stuff, but the articulation didn’t quite sound like the way Chick plays. I thought the writing was good. I especially liked at the end of the trumpet solo the way the arranger took, DAH-DA-DAH-DUH, and kind of shoehorned it in at the appropriate places in the changes, and it kept coming back, and then added more stuff, and it got deconstructed there. I thought that was really effective. That was a nice move. Once I heard the whole thing I thought that maybe…

To me, how do you start off a piece of music? That’s a really big question I always struggle with. There are things I’ve written over the years that I’ve performed with the intro that I wrote, and then without, and just start on the tune, and some kind of variation in the middle. Here I thought maybe it should have just started with the vibes and the piano, because to have the horns in front seemed a little pointless given everything else that happens in the chart. But that said, I thought it was a really effective arrangement. The trumpet solo was great, where they covered the horn. It sounds like somebody I ought to know, but I can’t really say who it was. But all in all, I thought the performance was really good and the writing was good, especially considering… I think it was four horns, and so whoever did this used a lot of imagination. There were also times when he was using the piano as a force to reinforce some of the horn voicings. I liked the piano player. If it wasn’t Chick, there were a few obvious Chick things that we’ve all learned and tried to do. Maybe back off on that a little bit, but generally the piano solo was good. 4 stars. [after] I just did a project with the Frankfurt Radio Band for Anat Cohen, Avishai’s sister. To get ready for the thing she sent me a bunch of recordings of possible tunes to do, and both her brothers are playing on some of these things. Man, what a musical family.

Muhal Richard Abrams, “Blu Blu Blu” (ABlu Blu Blu@, Black Saint, 1990) (Abrams, piano; Jack Walrath, trumpet; Alfred Patterson, trombone; Mary Taylor, french horn; Joe Daley, tuba; John Purcell, Robert DeBellis, Eugene Ghee, Patience Higgins, saxophones and woodwinds; David Fiuczynski, guitar; Brad Jones, bass; Warren Smith, vibraphone; Thurman Barker, drums)

Well, they modulated. I like the tuba player. I hope the guitar player isn’t a friend of mine, because I liked about the first chorus of it, and then some of the most annoying accompaniment I’ve ever heard. It just got in the way of the soloists. It was ok. It sounded like they were having fun. Who was it? I should go on the record—I love Muhal. I think he’s great. I think it was the guitar playing that got to me the worst. The guitar got in the way of a number of things. The last 3 bars, all of a sudden there was something there that showed whoever wrote this knows what he’s doing and does stuff beyond what this is. But I just thought some of the execution was a little…

Ryan Truesdell: Gil Evans Project, “Concorde” (Lines of Color, ArtistShare, 2015) (Ryan Truesdell, conductor; Steve Wilson, alto flute; Dave Pietro, alto saxophone [solo]; Donny McCaslin, flute; Tom Christensen, oboe, English horn; Alden Banta, bassoon; Adam Unsworth, David Peel, French horn; Augie Haas, Greg Gisbert [solo], Mat Jodrell, trumpet; Marshall Gilkes, trombone; George Flynn, bass trombone; Marcus Rojas, tuba; Lois Martin viola [solo]; James Chirillo, guitar; Frank Kimbrough, piano; Jay Anderson, bass [solo]; Lewis Nash, drums)

[immediately] Oh, this is “Concorde.” Gil. Is this Ryan Truesdell’s version? First of all, my hat is off to Ryan for the incredible amount of work that he’s done with Gil’s music, and getting it out there and re-recording it. This piece especially I first heard on a reissue of The Individualism of Gil Evans. I didn’t know this, but on the original version of that LP, Gil didn’t allow “Concorde” to be on it. When they reissued it on CD some years later, they put it on there. This is a wild arrangement… It’s John Lewis’ tune. It’s a tremendous piece of writing on Gil’s part. But you can tell on the original recording…there’s a point where it just sounds like nobody quite knows where they are. So just to hear it played by these guys and really hearing the writing much more clearly, to me is terrific.

The one issue I have with… I guess two issues. First of all, I’m so used to hearing Thad and Phil Woods, and whoever was playing on this were fine. They are fine players. [Greg Gisbert and Dave Pietro] Well, both of them… Greg to me is one of the great trumpet players in the world, and Dave is a really good alto player. But I’m so used to hearing Thad and Phil, and associating those sounds with the tune, it’s hard for me to separate those guys from the arrangement. The other thing is… This is a general thing, not only when Ryan has reworked Gil ‘s writing but other people have, too. Some of Gil’s writing was so rhythmically tricky to play that the recordings that Gil did are full of these little mistakes that the players make, and when you hear it recorded later by other ensembles, where they’re nailing it, it sounds weird. To me, the most famous example is [sings refrain of ‘Gone’] On the original record, there’s guys coming in early and all kinds of stuff. But then, I think when Miles did the thing at Montreux and Quincy conducted, and Kenwood Dennard was playing drums, and they did that piece and it was perfect, it sounded strange, because you expect… The bass clarinet is supposed to come in early here. What is this? So there’s something… [It’s supposed to be like Sweet Basil on a Monday night.] On Gil’s own recordings, the word I keep thinking of is there’s a charm about those, because they weren’t played perfectly. A lot of the time, the writing was such that… Those were the days when you wrote the charts, you went in the studio, you read it down once, you rolled the tape and then you went to the next one. That ‘s one reason why so much of that stuff was lost. Because the date would end and everyone would leave, and Gil ‘s not thinking, “Oh, maybe 30 years from now someone is going to want to study this in a school.” Everyone walks away. The producer takes it and uses it for his cat-box or something. Who knows?

The music was never really rehearsed as much as it should have been. But that leads to this…there’s this human-ness of the rough edges on Gil’s original records that to me are just beautiful. As much as I love what Ryan has done here, I miss those little threads hanging off. On the other hand, especially with “Concorde,” where the original record is so unfocused, this is great. Especially at the end, there’s this unison trumpet line, and they’re playing, and it’s terrific. I’ve got to give it 5 stars. [You raised an interesting point. This isn’t quite repertory. He’s unearthing compositions, reconstructing complete arrangements, and so on. Separating it from your taste, is it a good thing to have Gil Evans the way it was supposed to sound, if we can say it was supposed to sound that way?] Yeah, I think so. It’s never going to sound… Even back in those days, if it was played more or less perfectly or as close to perfect as humanly possible, the tone that guys played with back then was a little different than the modern players. So I think even if they had played the stuff really rhythmically precisely and everything, it would still sound a little different, plus, those were the days of analog tape. “Concorde” was recorded out at Rudy’s with that Rudy piano sound, and the sound of the room. So the sound of Rudy’s studio and the piano and the analog recording is as much part of the sound of that original record as the screwups and the stuff that didn’t come together quite right. But I still think it’s valuable that we can hear Gil’s piece in this case just played well. You’re right, one reason it’s not repertory yet is that it’s not widely available for people to play. It would be nice if that changed. I’ve seen some of the things that Ryan has had to work with — very sketchy sketches. The scores sometimes weren’t available, so he reconstructed these pieces from very sketchy stuff. I think it’s a really valuable addition to the repertoire.

Vince Mendoza, “Poem of the Moon” (Nights On Earth, Horizontal, 2011) (John Abercrombie, guitar solo; Ambrose Akinmusire, trumpet solo; Kenny Werner, piano; Christian McBride, bass; Greg Hutchinson, drums; Jim Walker, flute; Maria Dickstein, harp; members of the Metropole Orkestra, strings)

I liked that a lot. Was that Abercrombie? It had a really nice arc. It didn’t pretend to be more than what it was. I loved the ending. Several things we=ve heard today seemed that they end, and then they keep going and end again. This was very to the point, and I really loved the shape. The trumpet player sounded really good; I couldn’t identify exactly who it was. If it’s Abercrombie with strings, it’s probably Vince Mendoza, who is one of my favorite composer-arrangers. I’ve learned a lot from Vince over the years. That was probably Peter Erskine on drums. Oh, it wasn’t? It was a very nice setting for the solos and for the tune. It wasn’t pretentious. It was nicely restrained in a beautiful way. I thought that was really great. 5 stars.

Darcy James Argue, “Missing Parts” (Brooklyn Babylon, New Amsterdam, 2013) (Erica von Kleist (solo), Rob Wilkerson, Sam Sadigursky, John Ellis, Josh Sinton (solo), saxophones and woodwinds; Seneca Black, Tom Goehring, Matt Holman, Ingrid Jenson, Nadje Noordhuis (solo), trumpet and flugelhorn, fluegelhorn; Ingrid Jensen: trumpet, fluegelhorn, electronics; Mike Fahie, euphonium, trombone; Ryan Keberle, trombone; James Hirschfeld, trombone (solo), tuba; Jennifer Wharton, tuba; Sebastian Noelle, electric guitar; Gordon Webster, keyboards; Matt Clohesy, bass; Jon Wikan, drumset, percussion; Darcy James Argue: composer, conductor.

In this piece, I had the feeling I could chop it up into 32nd bits, and each one would be really striking on its own, but it seems like the composer kind of put them in order, one after another, and I don’t know if it flows so well. When it breaks into that kind of acid rock baritone saxophone solo, that really grabbed me. I thought, “Wow, ok, now it=s taking off.” Then it stopped. To me, it’s a little unfocused, but again, individual moments are really striking. There’s the brass stuff in the beginning, where there’s the trumpets, then the trombones, little solis of each section playing. Those were nice, but it followed the way the piece begins with some kind of…I don’t know if it’ s a…not a tabla, but some kind of clay… All that pointillistic stuff happening, then the trombone solo, then all of a sudden that stops, then we had these little brass interludes and then that stops. Some of the individual moments are really good, and I’d like to have heard…let’s stay with one for a while, wallow in it for a while and see where we go with it before shifting to the next thing. It was very well played, and it was well-recorded. You said it was part of a longer suite; I’d be curious to hear the whole thing. But I’ve got mixed feelings about it. I’ve written things like this, where… I look at it as hanging towels on a line. You’ve done your laundry, and each individual towel is a different color, and you go from one to the next to the next. So in a way, I kind of like that, but it seemed that the shift of focus was so drastic every… Like I said, it seemed every 30 seconds. When I’d hear it change to something new, I’d say, “Well, I know it=s going to change in another few seconds, so I’m not going to get emotionally involved in this.” [like speed dating] So I’d say 3 stars. To parts of it, I’d give 8 for the imagination, and parts of it I’d give 1 for… So 3. [after] That is a big, long piece. Sorry, Darcy. In general, I like what he does a lot. I thought that this, as an isolated thing, was… Is there a dance that goes along with this? [Not a dance, but it proceeds synchronously with continuous animation and live painting] In a way, I like a lot of the individual moments. There are parts of the Rite of Spring, not many, but a couple of parts that are kind of boring because there’s stuff happening on stage. In context with the visual thing, I’d probably have a completely different response. Just listening to the thing as music was not so… As I said, I start to back off from it because I thought, “Well, it’s going to shift again here.” Who was the bari player? [Josh Sinton] Don’t know him.

At 66, I don’t want to fall into that trap of being the grumpy old guy, and some of them were good friends of mine, and mentors, and I saw it happen, where they just complained about everything, and nothing is the way it used to be back in the good old days and all that… A lot of the projects I’ve done with the Frankfurt Radio especially, with artists who I don’t normally work with, has exposed me to a lot of kinds of music that at first was a little odd, and I had to figure out how do I adapt this for big band. But it’s opened me up to a lot of things, like Ibrahim Malouf, the trumpet player, or Rabih Abou-Kahlil. Then I also got to work with people like Abercrombie and Liebman and Beirach. I just did a thing with Branford in April that was interesting. I put together a program of tunes written by great trumpet players, and Branford came in and played his butt off. Anat Cohen. I did a thing with Luciana Souza a couple of years ago, with a lot of Brazilian music. Unfortunately, though, those radio companies are really bad at the record business. They used to have an in-house label that kind of went belly-up. We’ve talked about somehow finding a way to release some of the Luciana stuff. [everyone wants a big band record] Well, the problem is, everyone wants a big band record and no one wants to pay for it. With these radio bands, the stuff is recorded, and the guys in the band don’t need to get any extra money. It’s part of their gig to do that. But sometimes the artist…I’m arranging music that they’ve already recorded, and so they don’t want to put it out again, or whatever the reasons are. We=re working on a getting a couple… They did a thing with Chris Potter last year that we’re trying to get out.

So I’m trying to keep an open mind. Also, the students I have expose me to certain kinds of indie or whatever stuff. I had a guy a couple of years ago telling me about Doom music, and there=s a subgenre called Funeral Doom where the metronome quarter-note equals 40, and they detune their guitars lower. It’s awful stuff, but I’m exposed to this stuff all the time, and I’m not just sitting there, wishing that… I try not to wallow in the past. At the same time, respecting the hell out of the past and where we all came from. Trying to keep an open mind about things. As George Burns said, the secret to success in show business is honesty, and if you can fake that, you’ve got it made.

Arturo O’Farrill and the Afro-Latin Jazz Orchestra, “On The Corner of Malecón and Bourbon” (The Offense of the Drum, Motéma, 2014) (Arturo O’Farrill, piano (solo), composer; Ivan Renta, Peter Brainin, tenor saxophone, Bobby Porcelli (solo), David DeJesus, alto saxophone, Jason Marshall (solo), saxophones; Seneca Black, Jim Seeley (solo), John Bailey, Jonathan Powell, trumpets; Tokunori Kajiwara, Rafi Malkiel, Frank Cohen, trombones; Earl McIntyre, bass trombone; Gregg August, bass (solo); Vince Cherico, drums; Roland Guerrero, congas; Joe Gonzalez, bongos)

That’s funny. I don’t know what to make of that. It starts out like Don Pullen meets the World Saxophone Quartet in a big band with a Mideastern Salsa band. It kind of jumps around in the beginning. When it finally settles into the groove, the last thing, it=s happening. Although that kind of trumpet playing is… I was struck by the fact… There’s two trumpets going back and forth, and one of them tries to quote “Anything You Can Do I Can Do Better” and he messes it up. Anything you can do, I can’t do better. In a way, it was fun to listen to. I just thought the beginning was really scattered. Even with that kind of faux ragtime feel with the baritone sax solo, when it finally settles in, it sounded pretty good. The last thing, I guess a merengue, a really up Latin thing, was burning—that sounded good. But the beginning to me takes away from the effect of the whole thing. 3 stars. Very programmatic. [after] I had the sense he was trying a musical tour of things. So I just thought, especially in the beginning, there were a few things that didn’t quite work. Once it settled into some things, I thought it worked better. But there was a New Orleans kind of influence in the very beginning, too, so I couldn’t quite figure out where… Arturo is very good. To me, it would have worked better if there was something connecting all those ideas. Each one was presented like in a box, and if there was a way to break down some of the separation between them so it flowed a little bit, it might be more effective.

Don Sebesky, “Bill, Not Gil” (I Remember Bill: A Tribute to Bill Evans, RCA Victor, 1998) (Eddie Daniels, clarinet; Bob Brookmeyer, valve trombone; Larry Coryell, guitar; Dave Samuels, vibraphone; Marc Johnson, bass; Joe LaBarbera, drums; Dennis Mackrel, additional drums; brass and woodwinds)

I’m stumped. If that’s not Bob Brookmeyer on valve trombone, it’s somebody who really admired him. What stumps me is that the recording sounds rather modern, and it doesn=t sound like the kind of music Bob was writing in the last 20 years or so. The clarinet player sounded very good. It was really well recorded, and had a really nice sound to it. It sounds like the way Bob was playing in the last 10 or 15 years. His earlier playing, he covered more of the horn, high register, low register, had this very gruff side to his playing, and he really mellowed things out and smoothed things out. So it sounds like his later period as a player. For me it’s a little strange because the writing is good, but it’s much more conventional than the kinds of things he was writing in the last 30 years or so. And the clarinet player was great. I’m a lapsed clarinetist myself, and this player was very good. For Bob, I’d give it 4 stars. [after] I thought it was Eddie Daniels. Don Sebesky makes sense. He’s great. But I kept thinking, if it’s Bob and it sounds fairly recent, it’s not his writing, so it was a little strange. [As someone operating during the ’70s when Sebesky was everywhere, were you taking him into account in your own development?] In a way. I played some of his arrangements when I was in college. Actually, I played on a recording he did, an Ellington tribute, and it was great to see his stuff up-close and hear his writing. To some extent… When I was coming up as a budding young big band arranger in the late ’60s and early ’70s, Thad was exerting such a strong influence. Somebody once said about Arnold Schoenberg that he had such a strong influence, you either had to write like him or you had to really try hard to write not like him. There was no in between. Thad was kind of like that, when I was, say, 18-19-20 years old. He was still the biggest influence on me at that time. [All those Solid State records came out one after another.] Yes. The first one was the studio one, and the next two were live at the Vanguard. Frankly, the first Live at the Vanguard record is what convinced me to come to New York. I heard not only the band and the writing, but the vibe in the club. I thought, ANew York seems like a pretty nice place to be.@ But it was Thad and then Bob’s writing, and Oliver Nelson, probably the three who had the biggest influence on me when I was younger. Then Don… There are other things I played that I don’t think I knew were written by Don Sebesky until later on. But the sound he got out of a band is really his sound, and I like it a lot.

J.C. Sanford, “Your Word Alone” (Views From The Inside, Whirlwind, 2014) (J.C. Sanford, composer, arranger, trombone; Taylor Haskins, Matt Holman, trumpet and flugelhorn; Dan Willis, soprano sax (solo); Ben Kono, Chris Bacas, Kenny Berger, reeds and winds; Mark Patterson: trombone (solo); Jeff Nelson, bass trombone; Chris Komer, French horn (solo); Jacob Garchik, accordion; Tom Beckham, vibraphone (solo); Meg Okura: violin (solo); Will Martina, cello; Aidan O’Donnell, bass; Satoshi Takeishi, percussion.

I liked that. It would have a texture going and interrupt it, but the interruptions made sense. They startled you, and then you went back to the quarter-note pulse. I thought the thing built nicely. The string players sound very good, and just to record strings with a group like that…a small group…it sounded like there were two or three…it’s tough for the balance, but I think they did a good job of balancing everything. The playing was good. I have no idea who it is, but 4 stars. [after] I know J.C. very well. That’s from his CD that I didn’t listen to the whole thing! Is that Meg Okura?

Wynton Marsalis and Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra, “Saturday Night Slow Drag” (#2:3) (All Rise, Sony Classical, 2002) (Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra and Los Angeles Philharmonic)

That’s some wild stuff. I loved the last two choruses, the brass tutti, and some of the things that they’ve… Whoever wrote this, what they have the orchestra doing in the beginning is really striking. I feel pretty strongly about this. My one reservation is that the spirit of what we heard in the written stuff disappears in the solo section. I’m wondering, would there be a way to use… All of a sudden when the solos start, it’s just rhythm section and soloist. Which is fine. That’s a time-tested texture. But we lose whatever the tension and the wackiness that the orchestra had in the beginning. Then after the solos, this wonderful little double-time brass thing happens, so we’re back into that vibe again. So there’s just a bit of a hole in the middle, in the solos. But a lot of what they’ve got the orchestra doing is great. 4 stars. [after] That’s Wynton’s piece? It’s very good. I haven’t listened much to them recently. I know that the Frankfurt Radio Band did that piece with either the Dresden or Leipzig Philharmonic last year. I’ve got to check, out what Wynton’s doing more. I heard some of the things back in the early days, and some of Blood In The Fields. There was some nice brass writing in there, the way he used mutes. But the orchestra was doing some wacky stuff. They sounded good.

Alan Broadbent and the NDR Big Band, “Sonata For Swee’Pea” (America the Beautiful, Jan Matthies Records, 2014)

This is really well-written. I’ve got to say my favorite part of the whole piece was the coda. Because then he or she took some ideas from the tune and started to really work with it, and built a really nice shape, and there are some really nice events in the head chorus. The tune itself is pretty straight-ahead and conventional. But I thought especially at the end of the whole thing, that coda lifted it up and took it home nicely. The piano playing was good, and I wonder if the pianist was the arranger. No idea who it was, but the solo sounded really nice. I thought the flutes could have been mixed a little bit in the back; they were a little forward for the background for the piano solo. 3 stars. [after] I thought it was Alan, but I wasn’t sure. There was a phrase he played toward the beginning of his solo that said Alan Broadbent to me. But there wasn’t enough else to go on.

[Do the different radio orchestra in Germany each have their own personality, their own sound? ] Yes. It’s a result of obviously the players in the band, number one, and who=s writing for the band, who=s conducting them. All the bands have their strengths and weaknesses, just like any other group of human beings. But part of what makes a band easy or a challenge to work with is the atmosphere in the studio. That’s a human chemistry thing. Some bands… I don’t want to get into all the stuff. But some bands are known for being more collections of individuals, and some are a little more into playing together. I like to think that the Frankfurt band, where I’m the chief conductor, is very welcoming to outside soloists coming in, even though the music may seem a little odd at first to the players. I’ve tried to create an atmosphere where we’re going to work on this and get it good. To me, a very important part of any band is the lead trumpet and the drums. I think the combination in Cologne is a very good combination. In Frankfurt it’s a little different because of the players. Each band has its own personal personality and musical personality. There aren’t too many left. That=s another thing about it. The ones that have survived have had to make an artistic reason to live. They can’t just do the old stuff they used to do back in the glory days of the radio big bands. But then, those glory days weren’t so glorious sometimes. Some of the players weren’t so good. Again, the bands that have survived now have really good players in them that want to work and want to play, and want to get challenged by doing a lot of different kinds of things.

[So you have a good pool of musicians to draw from.] Yeah. There are music schools now in northern Europe especially that are producing players who are really quite good. In fact, the projects that these radio bands have done in the last 20 years, maybe even more than that…a lot of the younger players know about these bands and they know about the kind of music they’re doing, and they aspire to play in bands like that. Since there’s usually 17 or 18 people in each band, that’s not a lot of slots to fill, so when one does open up, there’s a lot of people interested in it. [It must add an edge to the playing when people want to hold on to the gig.] In the old days there were lifetime contracts. I don’t know if they do that any longer. You still have to really screw up to get fired. But in general, people realize it’s a good job to have, and a number of the players use the job as a home base, but then they also are very active doing other things, so they keep the musical part of themselves alive, not just by showing up to the studio but going out and doing other things.

Maria Schneider, “Nimbus” (The Thompson Fields, ArtistShare, 2015) (Steve Wilson [alto solo], Dave Pietro, Rich Perry, Donny McCaslin, Scott Robinson, saxophones and woodwinds; Tony Kadleck, Greg Gisbert, Augie Haas, Mike Rodriguez, trumpets; Keith O’Quinn, Ryan Keberle, Marshall Gilkes, trombone; George Flynn, bass trombone; Gary Versace, accordion; Lage Lund, guitar; Frank Kimbrough, piano; Jay Anderson, bass; Clarence Penn, drums)

That=s some strong stuff. Great alto playing. Whoever wrote it sounds like they’ve got a bit of Gil Evans in them. If it’s the pianist, the piano playing also has some Gil-ish stuff happening. It really built well. My only reservation is that, as good as the alto player was, there was a time when I thought it was time for him to stop and let the ensemble take over, and then bring him back in. There’s something that happens, because the alto is playing over almost the whole piece, and after a while we start to say, “Oh, that alto is still playing; I want to hear what else is happening.” I use this analogy a lot where, when the ocean is beating against the shore, the wave comes in, and then it pulls back and disappears, and then comes in again. It’s got more impact that way, rather than just constantly hitting the shore. So if I have any reservation about the piece it’s just to have the alto drop out and then come back in. But whoever the alto player is did a great job of shaping the solo at the end and really coming down. It was a very effective piece. No idea who it was, or who composed it. 4 stars. [after] Steve Wilson is great. For a moment I thought it was him, but there was something about the alto sound that didn’t sound quite like Steve. At first I thought it was Maria, then I heard something and I thought, “Maria wouldn’t do that.” That’s why I cancelled her out. Then I thought, “If it was Maria, it would be Steve, but it doesn’t quite sound like Steve, so…” But Steve Wilson is great, and Maria is terrific. Is that Thompson Fields? This will get me to pay for a download and get the recording. But it/s funny. There was a doubling of a couple of instruments playing unisons in a voicing, and I thought, “I didn/t think Maria did that.” But it’s really effective.

I’m struck by the number of pieces that began with a piano chord. In general, I enjoyed what I heard. When people ask me what do I listen to, between September and May I spend a lot of time listening to stuff my students do. Like I said, except for “Concorde,” which I was familiar with, and I know “Spain,” the tune, but a lot of this music I hadn’t heard before. I’m impressed with the writing and the different things people are trying to do. I think some are more effective at creating a continuous whole storyline than others. That to me is… The older I get…as human beings… It goes back to when you’re a little kid. “Tell me a story, Daddy; Mommy, tell me a story.” We love to hear stories. I think if you really think about the arc of the piece and the storyline first, and how do you tell that story, that’s the most important thing. It has nothing to do with chord voicings and all that kind of thing. That said, I had a feeling some of the pieces were more successful at linking everything together to tell a story than others. But in general, I enjoyed what I heard a lot.

[I didn’t play you much stuff that references 20th century European music. How would you have responded to those sorts of things?] When I’m hearing music that’s composed, one thing that goes through my head is this image of a person sitting at a piano, making decisions about things. I want the music to do this; I’m shaping this. It’s almost like a potter with clay in their hands, making something physical, or a playwright creating stage directions and creating roles for the players and musical ideas. I imagine this person sitting there, making decisions about things. I imagine the human person making the decisions. I think in some of those people you=d mentioned, there are varying degrees of decision-making that happen before the fact. The great thing about especially large ensemble jazz composition is, it’s a combination of stuff that was made up beforehand and stuff being made up on the spot. To me, that’s one of the central tensions of jazz composition that goes back to Jelly Roll Morton. I like to get the sense at some point in a piece that somebody has directed the thing to go in a certain way. Now, there are certain bands that have incorporated a lot of free improvisation. I heard the Globe Unity Orchestra a couple of times back in the day, and sometimes you had the feeling they just went out there and went for it, and made up stuff. Or a guy like Butch Morris, with his conduction things, where people are playing, and he’d start pointing and encouraging, and he had his language of gestures. This is a personal thing on my part, but I like the sense that somehow there is someone directing the thing. Now, it could be done very specifically, with notation; it could be done in a more general way. But that’s what I like to hear in a large ensemble. Some of the stuff I’d respond pretty positively to. I remember hearing Sun Ra in the ’80s when I was with Mel Lewis’ band. We played a concert that we played first, and then Ra came out with his whole ensemble. It was “Space Is The Place,” and it was great. So different than what Mel was doing. But you had the feeling that these guys knew what they were doing. A lot of it sounded completely whacked-out, but it had a flow; the whole set had a flow to it. That’s just what I like to hear if there’s more than 8 or 9 people on the stage. I like to hear some sense of it being organized. [A guiding intelligence.] Right. Some kind of intelligent being. [God.] Yeah. God ought to start a big band. I wonder what that would sound like.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blindfold Test, Jim McNeely

For saxophone master George Garzone’s 75th birthday, a DownBeat profile from 2016

In 2016, DownBeat gave me the wonderful opportunity to spend almost a week in Xalapa, Mexico, covering a wonderful festival curated by the young saxophonist curated and organized by alto saxophonist Arturo Caraza Orozco, then 30, who taught locally at the University of Veracruz, populated by some 60,000 students. For the festival’s second edition, Caraza booked a distinguished cast of characters, including a quintet co-led by saxophonists Garzone and Marco Pignataro; the John Patitucci Trio with Chris Potter and Rudy Royston; the Miguel Zenón Quartet;  trombonist-singer-composer-arranger Pete McGuinness fronting a locally assembled big band; and Gonzalo Rubalcaba’s Volcan. During my stay, I had an opportunity to spend quality time with Garzone and his partners, towards putting together this profile.

George Garzone: The Renegade” (DownBeat, 2016):

On the morning of day one of the 2016 Xalapa International Jazz Festival, a quintet of distinguished jazz educators—saxophonists George Garzone and Marco Pignataro, pianist Teo Ciavarella, bassist John Lockwood and drummer Ron Savage—reminisced as their van deliberately threaded the narrow streets, through a downpour, to Xalapa Conservatory, where master classes would ensue.

             Pignataro—born in Bologna and a Bostonian since 2009—and Garzone—Boston-born to Calabrian immigrants—pinpointed how Italian heritage influenced their sound projection, their mutual aspiration to emulate the human voice through metal instruments. In response, Lockwood—Garzone’s steady Monday night partner in the Boston-based outcat trio the Fringe since 1985—recalled playing bass on a 1990 concert with the Boston Pops as Stan Getz unfurled a stream of melody, noting the irony that Getz, so insensitive in his treatment of others, could generate such sweetness in his tone. Garzone recalled meeting Getz at the shop of famed Boston sax doctor Emilio Lyon, who had played with Garzone in an Italian marching band in the North End when both were young. “Emilio said, ‘Georgie, take out your horn and play for Stan,’” Garzone said. “He liked my sound and said, ‘Kid, can I try your horn?’ He loved it and wanted me to swap it for his gold-plated tenor.” Garzone declined. Getz got mad. “My mother got it for me,” Garzone told us. “I thought that if I gave it up, she’d kill me.”                                                          

            In concert the following evening as the Marco Pignataro-George Garzone Quintet, the cohort’s musical conversation embodied cohesion and mutual intuition emblematic of a long-standing unit, not one that had prepared with a single set at a Cambridge club the previous week. Garzone channeled Getzian lyricism on Pignataro’s arrangement of the traditional Neapolitan song “Voce ‘e Notte,” on Antonio Carlos Jobim’s “Eu Sei Que Te Vou Amar,” and on his own “Tutti Italiani.” Soloing on Ciavarella’s “Grande Theodore” and “Panarea,” he code-switched into the post-Coltrane refractions for which he is most widely known, sound-painting wild shapes and swoops.

            Pignataro, who is Managing Director at Berklee’s Global Jazz Institute, brought Garzone there in 2009. He conceived the project after BGJI Artistic Director Danilo Pérez remarked “how much he liked the contrast between the ways we play,” and suggested that Pignataro pursue a formal collaboration. “I like hearing music from the Italian point of view, melodic and emotional, and George’s sound is so strong that I always need to be careful, because it’s easy for me to start drifting that way,” Pignataro said. “George asked if I thought he was playing too out, that the music was so lyrical he should maybe play that way. I told him, ‘George, do your thing.’”

            Doing his own thing has been Garzone’s default basis of operations during his forty-plus-year-career as an improviser and pedagogue. “George is one of three tenor players I most admire, along with Wayne Shorter and Joe Lovano,” Pignataro said. “He has worked out a system not based on patterns and cliches, but on the particular way he looks at harmony, which allows him to showcase his strong sense of rhythm. He’s creative and unpredictable; you never know what his next note will be.”

            At 66, Garzone’s sparse discography, numbering 10 leader albums and another 10 with the Fringe, belies his exalted stature among musicians. “He’s very underrated in the saxophone world,” said Chris Cheek, one Garzone’s many distinguished saxophonist alumni—others include Branford Marsalis, Joshua Redman, Mark Turner, Donny McCaslin, Seamus Blake and Rudresh Mahanthappa—who were touring Europe during July festival season. “Maybe he’s overlooked because he’s a Punk Rock version of saxophone, the underground anarchist, not so warm or fuzzy or cuddly. But he’s incredibly substantial and broad.”

            “George is a very free player, not limited to trying to play in a certain style,” said Joe Lovano, an old friend. “He has a natural feeling and it flows out of him, no matter what kind of song or tune. He’s a force of nature in the improvised world.”

            Garzone’s low Q-score stems partly from his decision to remain in Boston and devote much of his energy to teaching. In one-on-one sessions, Cheek says, he gives students “license to go off into the abyss and not look back,” but he is also an eminent clinician, preaching an increasingly influential method, by which, Garzone says, players “connect triadic structures through inversions by half steps, to come up with non-repetitive, non-predictable lines, so you can improvise fresh melodies over chord changes with confidence.”

            A few hours after the master classes, Garzone distilled the message that took him more than thirty years to develop in an hour-long public lecture-demonstration before several hundred attendees. Interested parties can absorb it granularly in various lectures on Youtube, or on the DVD, The Music of George Garzone and The Triadic Chromatic Approach (JodyJazz) for which Garzone recruited a group comprising Fringe partners Lockwood and drummer Bob Gullotti, vibraphonist Mike Mainieri, tenor saxophonist Frank Tiberi and guitarist Chris Crocco. But three core aesthetic principles emerged.

            One is that eighth notes should be phrased straight, not in triplets. Another is to avoid articulation. “When you come to me for your first lesson, I will cut out your tongue,” Garzone said. “The action is from the fingers.” A third principle is “to be random, not repeat yourself.”

            “George creates a way of thinking that addresses the extemporaneousness of the moment,” Pignataro said. “We all come from the perspective of using articulation to swing, using the triplet feel, using sequence to create a kind of harmonic soundpost. His way of playing completely breaks you out of patterns. George creates this dissonance. You don’t know where he’s going, but suddenly he resolves the tension and plays this beautiful Stan Getzish melody.”

            Garzone delivered other, more personal aphorisms: “I was a street saxophone player, and that’s why I can relate to young people.” “It’s ok to sound a little different; you need one person in your life who tells you it’s ok.” “I play best under pressure; if it’s too smooth, I start making mistakes.” “The discipline of growing up in an Italian family made me stronger.”

            These themes cropped up in our conversation the morning of the concert, when Garzone, who started playing at 9, discussed his own education. His first role model, his uncle, Rocco Spada, the oldest of his mother’s six siblings, a veteran of two decades in local dance bands, taught George as he prepared pies in the kitchen of his popular Dorchester pizzeria. “As a kid, Rocco started playing violin, but his father broke it over his head one day,” Garzone said. “Then he took up the saxophone. His son Richie also played saxophone. They were into Johnny Hodges and Ben Webster, and their sounds were like crystal; of the three of us, my sound is the least favorable.”

            By 13, Garzone was gigging, earning as much as $250 a week. He took lessons with woodwind guru Joe Viola, his uncle’s good friend, for $6 a half-hour. Viola arranged for him to study at Berklee while still in high school, and to matriculate there after graduation. “It was unheard of, but they were goombahs, so he let me in,” Garzone said. “It was a Godfather-ish thing. These people completely took care of me all the time. I realize now that I was under severe guidance.

            “Before I graduated, I was freaked out about playing my senior recital. I told my father, ‘I’m not doing it; there’s a lot of pressure.’ He said to me, ‘Well, here’s the deal. We put you through college. If you don’t finish this thing, I’m going to kill you.’ Literally. And I did it. The point was, they were middle class workers, and they put up all that money to pay for college. The last semester of Berklee (my mother still complains about it) was $900. You can’t even register for $900 now.”

            Meanwhile, Garzone met an African-American keyboardist named Rollins Ross, who recruited him into a James Brown cover band that achieved considerable local popularity. “Rollins introduced me to the real deal,” Garzone said. “He was into Ahmad Jamal, who I’d never heard of. He was into everything. We both entered Berklee in 1968, and I started to get hip to Coltrane and Sun Ra. I’d never really looked at that side. When I played weddings with my uncle and cousins, they played only the melody. No improv. As I was learning how to trip out, I’d start to bop a little. They would go apeshit. ‘But you were the ones who pushed me to go to music school; this is what you wanted me to do.’ They were right in one sense, but they also realized I was starting to depart, and it was tough letting go. But that’s what was supposed to happen.

            “Had I not gone to Berklee, my life would be completely different. I met a lot of people, but I also realized how little I knew and how much shit I had to get together.”

            Around 1970, while Garzone was practicing “Giant Steps” on clarinet in a Berklee practice room, the door swung open. Joe Lovano, who’d been practicing in the adjacent room, came in. “George was playing familiar things but working them out in his own way,” Lovano said. “We started practicing and playing together, and before we knew it, we were developing together, too. We realized how much we were brothers.”

            The day after graduation, Garzone took a six-night a week, $30 a night gig playing behind “exotic dancers” in Boston’s “combat zone,” often calling Lovano to sub when he was booked elsewhere. He played Monday nights with bassist Rich Appleman and drummer Bob Gullotti, both classmates, thereby launching the first edition of the Fringe. Then he went on the road with a big band backing Tom Jones on a year-long tour, bringing Lovano on board for the final six weeks. “It was great,” Garzone said. “Private jet, we’re flying all over. Elvis sits in with us. Then they dump me off in Boston. The end.”

            After returning, Garzone, who married in 1975, rejoined the Fringe and began to teach. “I needed to make money,” he said. “Rich was head of Berklee’s Bass Department, and he got me some hours there. That gave me a health plan, and I was doing three or four weddings a week, so it looked like the right thing to do. I could have moved to New York, but I think it was meant for me to keep the Fringe together.”

            “George was always looked on as a master player, but never had the career or presence he could have if he’d come to New York in the 1970s,” Lovano said. “But his presence looms large, because he created, with love, what he’s doing with the Fringe, as well as his Berklee experience. As a teacher, he doesn’t hold anything back. So many saxophone players studied with him, but George’s students have also been drummers, bass players, guitar players, singers and piano players. He’s playing with all the cats all the time.”

            Two of the aforementioned “cats,” Berklee alums Leo Genovese and Esperanza Spalding, join Garzone on the conversational 2015 date, Crescent (Jazz Hang), on which the leader morphs from inside to outside, from consonance to dissonance, with old master inevitability. The tenor-piano-bass trio addresses four standards recorded by John Coltrane during the ’50s, and Coltrane’s “Crescent,” which Garzone infuses with “Meditations”-like intensity. Two Garzone originals draw deeply upon the languages of Getz (“The Girl From Argentina”) and Coltrane (“Hey, Open Up”). A few weeks before the session, Genovese—who has joined Garzone on more than a few duo concerts and with the Fringe—played duo with him on an as-yet released followup to the earlier DVD, focusing on augmented and diminished triads.

            “My triadic approach comes from Coltrane,” Garzone said. “I devised my own way of doing it because you’ve got to be able to show the kids how these structures are formed. To me, true creative improvisation is not written down. It comes from your ear, from having the willingness and freedom to take chances. I worked out a lot of this with the Fringe. Without the piano, I figured out how to play freely and be stable with a melodic line, whether or not it’s connected to the harmony—pulling melodies out of thin air. When I see a chord, I don’t look at it as I-III-V-VII. I look at it as a melody. That’s what guys like Lovano and I were taught from our fathers and uncles who were playing. You don’t hear that with young kids today, and that’s what I’m trying to stress to my students. Don’t just learn a G-minor-VII chord and play the notes in the scale. Learn how to make that sound like a love song.”

            Garzone gifted Genovese with a saxophone after they met on a 2005 recording session by Francesco Mela, and conveyed the Triadic Chromatic system through years of lessons. “George can make the most intricate concepts sound like a simple tarantella,” Genovese said. “He’s the sound of Italy that travels into America; he’s the history of an African-American spiritualism through John Coltrane. He’s folkloric. He shares all his beliefs and practices and dedication for this music, which is why he’s changed so many lives. It’s a message of ancestral quality, of someone who is like a father. He helps close doors of fear, and open doors of thought and possibility. When you try his concept and find the power that lives inside it, you are getting ready to be a warrior. The more you practice and internalize, another reality of sound emerges that seems of a higher ground.

            “He told me about hearing Now He Sings, Now He Sobs, where Chick Corea plays staccato straight-8th notes over the swinging feel. It’s very hard to do, but when George does it, it’s so crazy swinging and nasty funky. When you add this rhythmic feel to his sound and this crazy harmonic thing that he has dreamed, imagined and created, you end up with a Molotov cocktail. I melt when I hear George blow. It’s something like hearing Martin Luther King or Mahatma Gandhi speak. If you are able to listen, he will give you something to take home and think about, and he will change you into a better man.”

            Facing the second half of his seventh decade, Garzone shows no sign of tamping his inner flame. “George keeps propelling himself forward, like an astronaut getting a one-way ticket,” Cheek said. “To see his intent, energy, drive and spirit at his age is what we aspire to as younger players.”

            “I’m an underground renegade saxophone player,” Garzone joked, aptly describing his activity during the first two weeks of July in Copenhagen, where he would guest with numerous bands. “I don’t know if I scare people when I play,” he said. “It’s like they bring me in for a while, I juice them up, and then I drift out. This thing with Marco is an Italian situation; I like to groove with that, too. How long we’ll play, how many gigs, I don’t know. I’m so consumed with the Fringe, doing my own shit, I can’t commit to anything else. Plus teaching.

            “The financial thing today is a monster. If you’re going to be a musician, you’ll need to teach. You’re not even recognized unless you have a Masters degree, minimum. Kids tell me, ‘I want to wait a year, and go to New York.’ ‘New York will be there when you get back. Get that Masters now.’ There’s no gigs. There’s no playing behind exotic dancers. There’s barely any weddings. What’s happening in the teaching world is amazing. I’m happy I stuck it out.”

[—30—]

Leave a comment

Filed under DownBeat, George Garzone

For Sonny Rollins’ 95th birthday, the unedited text of our Downbeat Blindfold Test in 2014

  1. Wayne Shorter-J.J. Johnson, “In Walked Wayne” (from Better Days, 1998, Verve) (Wayne Shorter, tenor saxophone; J.J. Johnson, trombone, composer; Dan Faulk, tenor saxophone; Renee Rosnes, piano; Rufus Reid, bass; Victor Lewis, drums)

My reaction? Well, it’s very interesting. Very fine musicians. A nice concept. Nice new concept, a way to move the music along from the way it was some years back. I like it. [Any idea who was playing the tenor?] No, I don’t. The tenor player was great. Great playing, and as I said, it was an idea of moving the music along, to stay in the tradition but still to have different concepts, I guess you could say more modern concepts of what people are thinking today and so on. Everybody was really good on it. [Any idea who the composer might have been?] No, I don’t. As a piece of music, I’d say it would deserve all the stars. But I’d really have to hear some other music to know what to compare it against. [I’d like to play back the beginning, where the trombone plays the opening refrain.] I still don’t recognize the trombone. But he’s got a nice tone.

[AFTER}

[Can you share your feelings about J.J. Johnson, who I know was very important to you? And you’ve known Wayne Shorter a long time.] Wayne sounded great on it. That’s top people. J.J. , as you said, goes back a long time with me. Very nice. [Is it challenging to go cold into a situation, pick up the piece of music, and create an improvisation on the spot?] Is that what he did? Well, I don’t think it’s that challenging. A person like Wayne, who is a superb musician, I don’t think it would be any problem for him at all. This shows what a great musician Wayne is. Nice writing by J.J., too. Very interesting. I never heard that approach from J.J. before. I never heard him write anything that was so sort of open-ended. It was a nice combination. Wayne would be the perfect guy to be able to bring it off. I’d give it top rating. With those people, how can you not give that top rating?

  1. Warne Marsh, “When You’re Smiling” (from Two Not One, Storyville, 1975/2009) (Marsh, tenor saxophone; Niels Henning-Ørsted Pederson, bass; Al Levitt, drums)

Very nice. I don’t know who it was. Was it just bass and saxophone? [The drummer was on brushes, I think.] Yeah, brushes. Maybe so, very lightly. I wonder if it could be Lew Tabackin. No? Very accomplished playing, because he was playing without a piano… A piano would sort of lock it in, so you would have to…it would be easier, in a way, to play. So the fact that he didn’t have a piano, and maybe the drums were there…so it’s very accomplished playing. Very good musicianship all the way around. [Did he remind you of anyone stylistically or in regard to his tone?] Well, for a moment I thought he… I don’t know when this was made. [1975] 1975? Wow. No. But I guess that playing was probably reminiscent of that period. But I would be loathe to say anybody that he reminded me of. As I said, the playing was really top-notch, and especially in that very sparse rhythm section, where he had to do many of the inflections and the time himself. So I would give it a high amount of stars. [Were you familiar with the song?] No, I wasn’t familiar with the song. [AFTER] I met Warne Marsh a couple of times. I never associated much, hung out with him, but I did meet him on a few occasions. I heard him with Tristano early on, and I always admired his playing. I like his work. [What were your thoughts about the Tristano school when you were a young guy?] Well, when I first heard Tristano, I was more attuned to the straight-ahead style playing. As years went by, I began to hear a little more in it than I did at first. [Could you be more concrete about what you became more attuned to?] The intervals. The horns especially… A style of playing the intervals on the saxophone which would imply certain chord progressions. Of course, you think about Lee Konitz, who was very prominent in that group also. It’s hard to think about that without thinking about Lee. But I heard Warne play on some of these records, and I like it. I think he was a very accomplished musician in that style of, as I said, just playing with the bass player and I guess the drummer on brushes… That’s high marks.

  1. Joe Lovano, “Ko-Ko” (from Bird Songs, Blue Note, 2010) (Lovano, tenor saxophone; James Weidman, piano; Esperanza Spaulding, bass; Francisco Mela, Otis Brown, drums)

I know that song. That’s “Ko-Ko.” I’m taking a guess here. Maybe Sam Rivers? No? [What made you think it was Sam Rivers?] I know Sam Rivers would have been conversant with that period when “Ko-Ko” came out. I haven’t heard Sam in a while. Of course, I was wrong. It wasn’t Sam. Very nice treatment of the song. I liked it a lot. It was the song, yet it wasn’t the song. He didn’t try to play it with the four-four pulse that was on the original “Ko-Ko.” He was able to extemporize and do a lot of things. Of course, the drummer had a lot to do with what was happening, because he sort of played straight all the way through. He must have had his Wheaties that morning. [There were two drummers.] Aha! Ok. That’s why. That’s why I thought it might have been Sam, because it was someone who would be conversant with “Ko-Ko.” When I first heard “Ko-Ko,” I had bought a record by my favorite, Don Byas, “How High the Moon.” I think it was a Savoy record. On the other side was “Ko-Ko” by Charlie Parker. I wasn’t familiar with Charlie Parker. I was listening to tenor players. So I got this side, and then I played the other side and there’s this alto player playing a little bit stuff that I wasn’t that familiar with, and then the more I heard it, the more I liked it. It grew on me. So I really got “Ko-Ko” for Don Byas doing “How High the Moon,” and a chance to hear Charlie Parker, too, for the first time. [This track is such a different way of approaching that material.] Yeah, it was very good. I mean, it wasn’t foreign at all. What they did was still very much in the spirit of “Ko-Ko,” and yet it was different. I think it was very good. I don’t know who the player was or who the drummers were, but top musicianship, and top concept.

[AFTER]

I heard that Joe did this record, but I’d never heard it.

  1. Jimmy Heath, “Forever Sonny” (Little Man, Big Band, Verve, 1992) (Heath, tenor saxophone solo; John Eckert, trumpet solo; Jerome Richardson, Ted Nash, Bill Easley, Loren Schoenberg, Danny Bank, reeds; Eckert, Lew Soloff, Bob Millikan, Virgil Jones, trumpets; John Mosca, Eddie Bert, Benny Powell, Jack Jeffers, trombones; Roland Hanna, piano; Tony Purrone, guitar; Ben Brown, bass; Lewis Nash, drums; Steve Kroon, percussion)

That’s very nice. The saxophone player was really out front and forceful, and I liked the percussion. It had a lively beat; the rhythm section and the percussion really moved it along. So it had a nice feeling to it, definitely. It had a rhythmic feeling to it. I don’t know who it was, but I give it high marks. [Did the tenor saxophonist ring a bell at all?] Somewhat, but I can’t put a name to it. Within what he was playing, of course, I heard a certain traditional saxophone playing, but I couldn’t identify him exactly. [That’s a piece called “Forever Sonny,” and it’s by Jimmy Heath.] “Forever Sonny.” I wonder who that’s about? How about Sonny Stitt? [The rhythm would indicate it’s about you.] Yeah, the Latin… Yeah. I guess I’m a Latino, but I can’t speak Spanish. I had it. I was going to say Jimmy because of the arrangement. I could tell it was a creative arranger and arrangement, and I thought about that, but I didn’t say it. Now it makes sense that it was Jimmy. [I think he did this record around the time he did brass arrangements for one of your records.] Yeah. [And you’ve known him for a very long time.] I knew Jimmy way, way, way back, when they used to call him “Little Bird,” when he was playing alto more than tenor. I know the family—Percy and Jimmy, and his little brother, little baby “Tootie.” [Tootie played with you for a while.] Tootie was with me for a while, right. And I played with Percy a lot, with people like Howard McGhee, and when he was with the MJQ, of course (we did a record together). I was thinking about Percy the other day, because it was one of those really cold days, and I remember we played in Utica… I was listening to the people talk about Utica, which is up here in New York State, and we were playing with Howard McGhee, I’m pretty sure. We were staying in a hotel that was so cold, I had to turn… At least the water was hot. In those days, the hotels had a little sink in the room. So I had to turn on the hot water, and get the heat vapor that was coming from the hot water to get warm. But I was young then, and it was all good. It was all a lot of fun. Playing with Howard McGhee and Percy… So I played a lot with Percy, and I know the family. I know Jimmy’s father and mother, his sister… [Sounds like an alternate family, extended family.] For me, yeah. Whenever I was in the Philadelphia area, I’d always go by the house. Well, that’s Jimmy. I’m glad. He sounded real good on that. [But you’re not familiar with the tune.] No. [You weren’t aware he’d written it?] No. It’s very nice. I appreciate it also. [Could you clear up a point of historical record? The date you made in 1953 with Bird on Miles, “The Serpent’s Tooth,” Jimmy says was his tune, and that Miles appropriated credit. Can you comment?] I think that is possible, because things like that happened all the time in those days. I don’t know whose tune it was. If Jimmy says it was his tune, then I’m sure it was. Jimmy wrote a lot of stuff for Miles, so it probably was.

  1. Branford Marsalis, “Laughin’ and Talkin’ With Higg” (from Romare Bearden Revisited, Marsalis Music, 2003) (Branford Marsalis, tenor saxophone; Wynton Marsalis, trumpet; Eric Revis, bass; Jeff Watts, drums)

Very interesting record. I don’t know who it is. I was trying to figure it out, but I don’t know the players. But they are very musical. The saxophonist is very musical. From the things that he did with the trumpet player, it’s obvious that they must have been playing together—they’re a team of some duration. It’s indicative of maybe the ‘60s. It might be indicative… [Do you think it was made in the ‘60s?] It wasn’t. But that type of playing was very prominent in the ‘60s; that’s what I mean. But at any rate, the saxophone player was inventive and did very interesting things. I like it. He got some nice passages together with the trumpet player, and showed that they were simpatico. I can’t identify the drummer or bassist. They were playing straight all the way through, I believe. There were no breaks in the tempo. And the tempo was there. The bassist was very good. When he played by himself, he played a few interesting lines. They’re all top-notch musicians. [AFTER] Wow. So they are a team! They sounded very simpatico. [You shared bandstands with both Branford and Wynton.] Yes. [You did a concert with Wynton at Town Hall that ended because you got ill part-way through the concert.] Oh yeah. [You did a follow-up at the Beacon, and I recall that on the first tune, you played very powerfully for 20 minutes before Wynton soloed.] Yes. And Branford was at Carnegie Hall. With Wynton, do you mean I was rude? [Didn’t seem rude from my perspective.] Well, I’d hope not from anybody’s perspective. The other concert never came out, so this was the makeup concert. [Any impressions you care to share about either musician?] I wouldn’t have recognized them. To me, Wynton is not playing exactly like that. Or maybe he is. But on this one, he’s playing a little more, to my ears, avant-garde. But I haven’t heard Wynton throughout the entirety of his career, so I’m probably not knowledgeable to say that. But I didn’t think about Wynton. I thought more, for a while, that it would be somebody like Don Cherry. Then I realized that he was playing a little different, he was playing more of the traditional trumpet playing, so it wasn’t Don Cherry. But his style on that was more reminiscent of Don Cherry to me than I would have thought from Wynton. And I did not recognize Branford’s playing on that. But now that you tell me it’s him, I can recognize it. I think I referred to the fact that he was very inventive and it was musical. In retrospect, it would figure that it would be Branford.

  1. Eastern Rebellion, “My Ideal” (Simple Pleasure, MusicMasters, 1992) (Ralph Moore, tenor saxophone; Cedar Walton, piano; David Williams, bass; Billy Higgins, drums)

I almost wanted to get out my horn and start playing when I heard that. That’s one of my favorite songs, “My Ideal.” I don’t know who the saxophone player was. I don’t know who the piano player was. But that’s one of my favorite tunes, so it was nice. The treatment was good. The saxophonist sounded very much like Coltrane at the beginning, before I realized it wasn’t Coltrane. But he had it down, the very, very nice high register playing that Coltrane did so magnificently. But I don’t know who it is, other than that. The piano player I thought was nice. The treatment was nice. I like the fact that everything doesn’t have to be straight rhythm, and they did it out of rhythm and then came in. So I liked the treatment. [Older player? Younger player?] I would say it must be a younger player, because he was playing Coltrane’s style to some extent. So it’s probably a younger player. But I wouldn’t know. There’s a lot of guys who try to play like Coltrane, as we know, so I don’t know who it could be.

[after]

I played with Cedar on a couple of occasions. One time I played with Cedar in a configuration with Milt Jackson, and another time, when I first met Cedar many years ago, we played at Sarah Lawrence College, with David Amram, as a matter of fact. So I am familiar with Cedar’s playing, but I didn’t know it was he on that. [What are your feelings about younger players dealing with influence? Any thoughts about addressing that aspect, dealing with all the information out there?] There’s a lot of information. I guess everybody knows that. There’s more information out there today than there may have been before. Maybe. I don’t know. I got my information… I managed to hear the people I needed to hear—Illinois Jacquet, Hawk, Lester Young, Eddie Davis. I got to hear the people that I needed to hear. I guess it’s no different today. Maybe there’s more… You can hear records from all over the place, and hear guys at different times maybe in their career. But I think it’s so much of a… The whole musical thing… It’s very difficult to pinpoint how much a person should take from somebody else and how much they should do on their own. It’s just the gift of certain people. Now, the information is now out there. It was before, as I said, but now it’s definitely out there. So these guys can hear Eddie Vinson, they can hear Earl Bostic, they can hear all these great players of yore. That doesn’t mean they’re going to sound as good as they are. I didn’t say “like them,” because nobody is going to sound exactly… But they are not going to sound as proficient or as musical as they are just because they can hear it. So it’s very difficult to say what information guys should get. It’s sort of simplistic, but it’s still a matter of the individual player having a certain amount of talent, God-given talent, and how he uses it is really immaterial. He’s either got that gift or he doesn’t have that gift. I think it’s wonderful that this information is readily available on mp3s, on Youtube. But it’s great to see a video of Benny Carter playing, or Ellington, or all this stuff. It’s great. But it’s still a matter of being touched by the musical gift. I don’t care how much you hear. I don’t care how many guys you hear. From Charlie Parker to Cannonball to Johnny Hodges to Tab Smith, it doesn’t matter. You have to put it together. And to put it together, you have to have a gift. There’s no getting around it. You can’t fool music. Music is like Mother Nature. You can’t fool Mother Nature. Either you have a gift and then people hear it, “yeah, wow,” and you’ll know. But other than that, sure, you can be a proficient musician, and there are many proficient musicians, maybe more so now because people are in the schools and everything. So that’s possible. But when you or I are listening, and to hear something that catches you, “Wow,” that’s a gift.

  1. Roscoe Mitchell, “The 4-50 Express” (Sound Songs, Delmark, 1997) (Roscoe Mitchell, tenor saxophone)

I heard a little bit of Eric Dolphy in there. I don’t know who the player is, though. But I heard something that reminded me of Eric Dolphy. But if it’s not Eric Dolphy, then I don’t know who it is. [Anything to say about playing solo?] Yes, that’s very interesting. [You included a solo cadenza on Road Shows, Vol. 3.] Did I? Ok, I’ll have to remember that one. I liked what this guy was doing. It was interesting, and he was able to sustain the narrative, so to speak. I think he was good. I really liked his solo playing. I thought it was good. It takes a certain… To play solo, you’ve got to do everything yourself, and I thought he set that up, and had a good set of lungs on him. So I liked it. I have to give this high, high stars. [Have you done more than one solo concert? There’s a solo recording from the garden at the Museum of Modern Art.] I did one when I was living in India, and I was playing for some students there. Also, the first time I did that was at the Greek Theater in Berkeley, where I played a solo concert in the late ‘50s. [Talk about your attitude towards that type of playing.] Well, Coleman Hawkins did a piece called “Picasso.” Of course, anything Coleman Hawkins does is supreme. The idea is fascinating. This fellow that we just heard was able to do what was inside of him. That was his expression. I would imagine that this guy plays like that all the time; whether it’s solo or not, that would be how he sounds. In my case, when I do solos, I probably try to make it more of a difference between when I was playing with the group. Maybe. I’m trying to recall really what I go after. But maybe not. Maybe not, because how much can you change? When I’m playing, I don’t think too much. I just want to play and not think. So I can’t say it’s that different, really, than when I’m playing with the group. But there are certain things that you have to be aware of. You have to make beginnings and endings and things like that, that you might not have to be so concerned about when you’re playing with a band, when you’re being accompanied. Or even that’s not exactly true. So it’s hard to say.

[When you did the solo concerts, what were the origin points? As I recall the Museum of Modern Art concert, it was quite extemporaneous.] Oh, yeah. Well, everything I do is extemporaneous. I think I had some motives written out, and I tried to get to them from time to time. But when I did my concert at the Greek Museum, I just went out and I played to the audience. I’d go over to a section of the audience, and I would sort of play to them. Then I’d walk over to another section of the audience, and I’d play to them. Then I’d walk over to another side of the stage and play to them. This was how… I didn’t really recall a lot about it, although I remember a guy said that it reminded him of a country preacher. A musician friend of mine, Ozzie McFadden, told me that. He said, “Man, it sounds like a country preacher, going over to each set of people, playing.” So that was probably part of it. Also, on the record you just played, maybe the guy was in the studio and didn’t have that possibility before him. I would imagine that he was just playing. But it’s very interesting.

I heard Coltrane years ago do that, and Coltrane reminded me of when I was in Japan. They had a style of singing… I think I heard some Japanese people say it originated in China. Anyway, they’d come to the stage, just one person, and they’d just start going through their thing. It was of a piece, of course. That’s what Coltrane reminded me of when he did that. I don’t know if he always did it that way. It’s different dynamics when you’re playing alone. You definitely have to take different things into consideration.

[after] That’s great. I like Roscoe Mitchell. I liked the piece.


  1. Chris Potter, “Small Wonder” (Ultrahang, ArtistShare, 2009) (Potter, tenor saxophone; Adam Rogers, electric guitar; Craig Taborn, Fender Rhodes; Nate Smith, drums)

That’s very interesting. I like the arrangement and the broken rhythm. People seem to be playing more broken rhythms today than straight-ahead rhythms, which is great. I’m all in favor of that. I like that. So I like this piece. I like the fact that they were trying to do some extemporization against something besides a 1-2-3-4, 1-2-3-4. So I like the composition, and the players were great. The saxophone was great. The guitar player was also great. He did some nice things in concert with what the composition called for. What he played wasn’t just him playing; it was part of what the composition called for, to my ears, and I like that. So I’d say it’s great. I liked it all very much. The saxophone player was great, and the piece was great, the broken rhythms they were playing was great. Everything. I liked it.

  1. Michael Brecker, “Loose Threads” (from Pilgrimage, Heads Up, 2007) (Brecker, tenor saxophone, composer; Pat Metheny, guitar; Herbie Hancock, piano; John Patitucci, bass; Jack DeJohnette, drums)

Great playing by everybody. Top-notch players. Great tenor player and everything, but there’s one thing that listening to this reminded me of. I personally prefer to play without a piano, because piano music is different than other music, to me. Not completely, of course. Nothing is completely. But to a great extent. Now, this was a good example of that. The pianist was great, and he was playing on what they were doing. But a piano has so many more tonalities, chord structures, volume…everything more than a horn has. So I favor playing… I love piano playing… This guy was great, and he was really into it. And the saxophone player before him was great, too. But it can be… I shouldn’t try to make it… [Are you saying that the pianist got in the tenor player’s way when the tenor player was playing, or that the efflorescence of the pianist’s solo took away the spotlight from the tenor player?] I’m saying the latter. [Not that he interfered with him.] No, I didn’t hear him interfering with the saxophone player when he was playing. And I’m assuming that this Blindfold Test is about the saxophone player. So that’s my only point. They’re both great. The saxophone player was superb. A great musician and a great composition. But listening to this reminded me that it’s hard to… Maybe you don’t have to have… Maybe it can be a piece like the Modern Jazz Quartet or something, where there’s no prominent. I came up in an era when it was a soloist and then the band accompanying them. So this would be the exact opposite from that nowadays. At least this piece would exemplify that. That would be my only comment. Other than that, the music was fine, the piece was nice, the saxophone player was great, the piano player was great—the whole thing was very enjoyable. [Any inklings of who they might have been?] What about this guy, Vijay Iyer? No? Ok. I heard Vijay Iyer one time, and I liked him. I don’t know his music very well, but I took a guess. Anyway, all of them were superb. [after]

This raises a question in regard to what you said about piano players. You had Herbie Hancock in your band for a quick minute, and before him, Paul Bley was in your band for a while. Before Paul Bley, it was no chordal instrument—just you, Don Cherry, bass and drums. Before that, it was the quartet with Jim Hall on guitar. So you worked in all of those configurations within a short timespan. Before you went on the bridge, you did all the famous trio things, but also recordings with great piano players like Tommy Flanagan and Monk and Wynton Kelly. This is more of a personal question. I’m curious, when you were working with Paul Bley and Herbie Hancock, what you were looking for, why you returned to a piano context.]

Well, this is not a hard-and-fast rule. For instance, playing with Paul Bley, he was almost like playing with another horn player. I didn’t find any sort of conflicting direction that the band was going in. Paul is great. I’m just saying in this case, the pianist, Herbie, was so strong, he’s such a great player that it takes away from the saxophone concept. That’s what I was sort of commenting on, talking about the saxophonist rather than the whole band.

[In Coltrane’s band, a lot of times he’d have McCoy Tyner build the intensity, an intense solo for 8 minutes, and then Coltrane would come in and just explode.] Right. [In Miles’ band with Herbie Hancock and Wayne Shorter or George Coleman, there would be almost like five equal voices. Very different approaches to an ensemble.] I agree. In Coltrane’s band, because of McCoy… McCoy is such a strong player and strong personality, and in many ways he was so simpatico with what Coltrane was doing, plus you had Elvin Jones, who was keeping the intensity going. So that they were ready for Coltrane; when Coltrane came in, the guys were right there. It’s not always going to be that case. Because by the time you listen to McCoy playing with other musicians, they’re going to be pooped by the time he’s through, so Coltrane is not going to get the backing that he needs. Coltrane’s group had that great Elvin Jones, so they were building. That is why that worked so beautifully. [Miles, it seems, wanted to absorb what everyone was doing so he could play off it in a certain sense.] Right. Miles always had to have a strong saxophone player. He always needed that in his groups. If you look back on his career, he always had to have a strong saxophone player to play off of, just like you say; the band does their thing, and then he comes in, sort of commenting on everything that’s been played—like that. I agree completely.


  1. Ivo Perelman, “Singing The Blues” (The Hour Of The Star, Leo, 2010) (Perelman, tenor saxophone; Matthew Shipp, piano; Joe Morris, bass; Gerald Cleaver, drums)

I have no idea who that is. But it is an excellent demonstration of the bountiful sounds of the saxophone. The saxophone is such a versatile instrument that it can almost recreate any sound, and I think that why the saxophone is still such a popular instrument. I don’t know who this gentleman was, but he’s very good, and he’s got his own thing going, very different from the other stuff that I’ve been hearing today. I’d give it high marks. The piece was done in a way that it wasn’t monotonous, that just one horn was playing all the way through. It just sounded like a piece of music. The arc of the piece was such that I didn’t realize it was as long as it was, and that he was playing, which is always a good sign.

  1. James Carter, “Gloria” (Gardenias For Lady Day, Columbia, 2003) (Carter, tenor saxophone; John Hicks, piano; Peter Washington, bass; Victor Lewis, drums; string camarata)

Very great saxophone playing. Wonderful. I’m sorry I don’t know who it is, but a great tenor player, and I like the strings with him. Very pleasant. [Were you familiar with the tune?] No. I thought I heard something I remembered, something by Duke Ellington, like “Don’t You Know I Care,” but it went somewhere else. [That was a tune by Don Byas that I think he recorded in Europe in 1948.] No kidding. [Does that give you a clue as to the player?] No, it doesn’t. It could have been several… I can’t say that, because each saxophonist sounds so different that it’s hard to say. Now, this guy played something different that I haven’t heard anyone else play—some of his inflections. I don’t know who it is, but he is a superb player. As I said, everybody has something different to express through the saxophone. It’s a marvelous horn. I don’t know who he is, but whoever he is, it’s really great.

[after]

I’ll be darned. I didn’t know that. But James certainly is a great player.

I am very happy that all these gentlemen you played for me today are all unique and all deserving of my highest praise—everybody.

[END OF BLINDFOLD TEST]

2 Comments

Filed under Blindfold Test, Sonny Rollins

R.I.P., Vocalist Nancy King (1940-2025), WKCR Interview, May 11, 2006

TP:  Nancy King is not too often heard in the NYC area.

KING:  No. It’s taken 40 years really for me to get here, and actually be doing…in a big… I’ve been in shows here. About four or five years ago, we Roy Nathanson’s Fire at Keaton’s Bar & Grill at St. Ann’s in Brooklyn. I just sang one song in that show. It was great.

            I’m just glad that thanks to Karrin Allyson and Fred…they brought me here to do these gigs, and then we were able to make a record… Richard McDonnell and his son Clayton heard the tape. See, Fred didn’t tell me we were recording last October when we made this record. I didn’t know we were making it.

TP:  Does that give a different quality to your performance if you know there’s a microphone on?

KING:  Oh my God, yes. This particular gig – I arrived in town about 3 o’clock, we were on at 7, and we didn’t have time to rehearse or anything. We just went to the gig. I said, “Hi, Fred,” and we went to the soundcheck, and Fred said, “Do you know these tunes?” and he held up a list, and I looked at them, and I said, “Yeah, I know them all.” He said, “Good. I’ll pick the tunes and away we go.” That’s what happened. But he didn’t tell me that Martin was going to be recording.  It was just one night, but it was a Saturday night, and there were three sets, and he’d recorded all three of them. At the end of the gig I said, “Darn! Fred, we should have recorded this; this was really cool.” That’s when he told me that… He said, “Heh-heh-heh…”

TP:  Gotcha.

KING: “We gotcha, baby.” We played it for Richard, who wasn’t able to be at the gig, who wanted to hear me. He said, “How did that gig go with that Nancy King?” Fred goes, “Want to hear it?” “You recorded it?” He gave it to him to listen to, and Richard listened to a couple of tunes and said, “Oh my gosh. Is she signed with anybody?” I wasn’t. I’m not. He said, “Could we put this out?” So it’s out.

TP:  So when the credits say “all arrangements by Fred Hersch,” that’s a way of saying he played piano and…

KING:  He chose the tunes. And we just went for it. I’m maybe one of the few people he’d feel comfortable doing that with.

TP:  Not so many people would feel comfortable doing that, period, particularly in this time…

KING:  Everything is so kind of set and perfect and… Look at me! I don’t wear any makeup. I’m about the music more than anything else. That’s what my main thrust has always been.

TP:  I’d like to speak a bit about your background in music, for the New York crowd who might want to know something about you. You’re from the West Coast and moved to San Francisco in the early ’60s?

KING: It was 1960. I was a year out of the University of Oregon, where I had gone, and was still playing drums with Ralph Towner and Glen Moore. I played drums professionally for twelve years. Didn’t do much singing. Just played the gig. When I was young, I wanted to play drums, because I didn’t want to play piano or anything. I didn’t know I was going to do this for my life until Ella came to Eugene, where I was born…

TP:  Eugene, Oregon?

KING: Yeah. In 1940. Ella came there when I was 14, and played a concert at McArthur Court there, up on the university campus. I was the first one in the door. I had waited all night to be the first one in, because it was general admission. I get in the front row, and I’m 14, and I’m like, “oh, gonna see Ella for real.” She came out and she sang, and I was just, “Oh-my-god, that’s what I’m going to do.” Because she didn’t do too much improv at that time on the records. She had signed with Norman Granz, and I didn’t get to hear her scat. But when she was live, she just scatted every tune. I was just like, “Yes! Yes! I’m going to try to do THAT.” Because I was already bored. I had sung with my Dad’s little band… Both my parents were musicians. My mother was a classical concert pianist, and she had given up her career to marry my Dad and move to Oregon from Michigan. My Dad was an old stride player. He’d learned to play… He was like me. I can’t read music, I’ve never had any lessons. I’m self-taught.  I just listen to the tunes. I’ve trained my ear to hear everything. So I don’t have any real musical background, except I’ve been able to play with some of the greatest people in the world because I’m doing what I’m supposed to be doing. And God always took care of me somehow.

TP:  Let’s step back to the ’50s. You heard Ella Fitzgerald…

KING:  I heard Ella when I was 14. It was 1954.

TP:   You’d been singing with your father’s band, so you’d already been on a stage and knew what that meant.

KING:  Kind of. I’d go to the Moose Hall dance, and sing, “Let’s take a boat to Bermuda.” They’d point to me, and the guys were… Already I noticed that the musicians were having all the fun. They’d point to me and take the tune out, and it was the same thing. “Let’s take a boat to…” I was going, “Wait a minute. What’s wrong with this? I’m not having as much fun as…” Not being able to play any instruments. I tried. I tried trumpet and saxophone, and I didn’t have any embouchure for anything. So I said, “Well, I guess I’ll have to use my voice.” Since then I’ve just been on it. Because I love this music.

TP:  So since 14, you’ve been working…

KING:  I’ve been on it. I’m trying to do this.

TP:  Ella Fitzgerald inspired you. Did you ever try to emulate her sound or her phrasing or her approach, or that of any of the other great singers of the day?

KING:  Just for the purpose of learning how… I loved her syllables for her scatting. They were the most comfortable to me. That’s what I wanted. So just for the sake of learning to be comfortable with those syllables, I did memorize her… I didn’t try to sing it like her. I’ve never tried to sing like anybody. I loved all the great singers, and learned from them about phrasing and tone and all those things that you would want, but I never learned to sing like any of them. And I’m a mimic. I’m a Gemini. I make sounds… If I wasn’t doing this, I would have gotten into voiceovers. Because I can do voices like crazy. I can do, [DEEP VOICE] “I am your FA-ther.” Since mental-pause, I’ve gotten a whole octave down here…

TP:  It’s augmented your career, has it.

KING:  Yes. Every now and then I’ll be singing away at the club and go, “la-la-la-la, AGGH,” and people just… But I have it, so I’m going to use it. Anyway, my background was just my two little parents. I’m the youngest in the family.

TP:  So between 14 and 20, when you got to San Francisco…

KING:  How I got to San Francisco was my roommate in college, Sandy Forrest, had dropped out after the first semester there, and disappeared. I hadn’t been able to talk to her or find out anything. She called me in January 1960. I graduated from high school in 1958, and then in 1959 went to the University of Oregon. In January 1960, a brand-new year, I get a phone call from her from San Francisco. She goes, “Hi, Nancy.” I go, “Well, Sandy, how are you? How have you been?” She goes, “Oh, I’ve been living in San Francisco, and I’ve married a saxophone player named Norwood Poindexter.” I went, “Norwood Poindexter. I hope he can play.” She goes, “Oh, he can play. He’s playing in the Ike Isaacs Trio, backing up Lambert, Hendricks & Ross.” I went, “WHAT?!” She said, “But he just lost his singer. And he has a band of his own, playing at the Stereo Club in San Francisco…” This was Pony Poindexter, not Norwood. So she said, “I want you…” He had just lost his singer, Bev Kelly, who had run off with some bass player or something. She said, “He doesn’t believe that you can sing jazz with any authority, when you milk two cows every morning before you even start the day.”

TP:  Is that how you lived your life in those days?

KING:  Oh, yes. I was born on a ranch. A farm.

TP:  You hadn’t mentioned that little detail.

KING:  Well, we jumped from being born to 14, when I saw Ella. So you missed out on some…

TP:  True. So between that, you were playing drums, milking cows…

KING:  Yes. I had to ride my horse over to my friend’s house (it took half a day to get there) to play these drums and for us to practice. I’d been doing that since I was 8.

TP:  The wide-open spaces leads to an independent spirit.

KING:  I think so. That’s me. So I’ve never wanted to sound like anybody else. I always wanted just to do my thing, and it’s persisted through the years that I’ve acquired my own sound.

TP:  So you come down to San Francisco to prove that someone who milks cows…

KING:  …can actually sing. So when Pony actually heard me, I went to work… When I arrived at his house, do you know who was sitting in his house? The infamous Lord Buckley. They were great friends. So I’m meeting Pony Poindexter, and here’s Atlee Chapman, who was in his band, who was a great trombone player, and there’s Lord Buckley. I was more concerned to see Lord Buckley. I didn’t even know who Pony was. “Lord Buckley, oh my God…” I was freaked out. “Oh, the Nazz!” I was, like, gone. So I got the gig. I go to the gig the next night with Pony, and he hears me, and he realizes that I can sing. He goes, “Yes, but we’re going to do all the Lambert, Hendricks & Ross things, because I sing and Attlee sings, and you’re going to be Annie Ross.” He gave me The Hottest New Group in Jazz record and said, “Learn all these tunes.”

TP:  By tonight.

KING:  Well, soon. That’s what I do. I’ve trained my ear to do that. I don’t have anything to read. Actually, the hardest part for me was learning all the lyrics, like “Four,” “Now’s The Time” and all those things. But I learned everything on that record, and I learned everybody’s part, too. So I could cover Dave Lambert, if he needed a break, or I could cover Annie, and… I almost got to do a gig with them. Annie was ill, and she was going to go back to England, and they were playing at the Fairmont in San Francisco. They were supposed to be playing there. She was getting ready to go home to England because she wasn’t feeling well. Dave wanted to do the gig. Dave Lambert and Jon both knew that I could cut the mustard. But the guy at the Fairmont…

TP:  You weren’t a name. She was a name…

KING:  “Nancy. Who?!” I wasn’t even Nancy King then. I was still Nancy Whalley. I hadn’t even met Sonny yet, and become Nancy King. “Nancy Whalley. Huh? What?” It didn’t hurt me, though, because I learned all those tunes, and Pony and I and Atlee were singing them every night on his gig. So that was my first gig in San Francisco, was because my roommate married Pony Poindexter.

TP:  Well, you were well-connected, and you took good advantage of those connections.

KING:  I mean, she could have married some plumber or something. But she married Pony Poindexter. That’s how I got to San Francisco, and that was the beginning of everything. I’ve lived in Montana, and I had a piano player there who was like Bill Evans, for God’s sake. He lived in Helena. My sister lived there. I’d gone there to visit her, and I decided to stay, because I’d just had my son, Joel, and I was home nursing, and my Dad… Something happened to our irrigation system. I’d driven over with him to visit my sister to take her children back; they’d spend every summer at the farm. So I just went to say, “Hi.” But I liked it there, and I thought, “Gosh, I think I’ll just stay a while.” So I had to get a gig. I auditioned all the piano players in town, and it was like every church lady came down there, ROOTIE-TOOTIE-TUTTI, and I’d go, “Oh, thank you very much, but that’s not what I’m looking for — thank you.” So the end of the day came and I hadn’t found anybody, and then this guy runs in, and he’s all funky, and his hair is sticking out, and he’s got a glass eye, and one is over here and one is over there — I didn’t know which one to look at. He goes, “Is the audition over?” I go, “Oh my God. If this guy looks… What’s he going to be like?” so I go, “Yes, but come on in.” He said, “I’m sorry I’m so dirty; I work for the Highway Department; I’m an engineer and I didn’t have time to change; I was afraid I was going to miss it. Listen, I haven’t played for ten years…” I go, “Oh, great. Well, whatever. It’s all right.” He said, “But I just love jazz, and I know a lot of tunes.” I go, “So what tune do you want to do?” He goes, “Gee, let me think… Do you know ‘Lush Life’?” I said, “Do you mean Billy Strayhorn? You mean ‘Lush Life’.” He goes, “Yeah.” I go, “Yes.” He said, “Do you do the verse?” I go, “Thank you, God! Thank you.” I didn’t even care how he played. [LAUGHS] But he was fabulous!

TP:  So where did you play in Helena, Montana?

KING:  I played at the Bank Club until it burned down. We got the gig there.

TP:  This is what year?

KING:  This is ’62 or ’63. Sonny came up there and we started living there, and we worked… You know Charley Pride, the great country singer. He was living there, in the town, just working at the smelter there, and on his way home from work he’d come in and have a beer, and he was all funky and beat up from the smelter. “Canadian Sunset” was the only song he knew – he played his own music and sang his own stuff. He’d go, “ONCE ah-hi was a-LONE, SO low-ne-ly and then…” “Canadian Sunset” was the only popular tune that he knew. So we’d play that every time he’d come in. Well, we had a benefit for him. There was a disk jockey who was like you. His name was Tiny Stokes. He was a HUGE man, he was like Mister Five-by-Five, a big fat guy…

TP:  Let the record state that I am not Mister Five-by-Five…

KING:  No, Ted. You’re lookin’ good. He is not heavy, folks. Anyway, this guy was huge. But he loved him, and Sonny and I did a benefit for Charlie… But Tiny Stokes knew Chet Atkins, and we were instigational in getting Charley to Nashville to become famous. Years later, he came and played at our country fair in Eugene, and he flew in in his jet, and…

            The point is: It didn’t matter where I’ve gone in this world. I’ve been provided with someone wonderful to play for me. This Walter Nelson… His name was Blackie Nelson. They called him Blackie because his hair was jet-black, and it stuck up like Woody Woodpecker. So the whole time I was in Helena, I had this fabulous person to play with. I was still playing drums then, so we had a duo, and he had a great left hand… He was just perfect.

TP:  Has playing drums had an impact on the way you sing?

KING:  Well, I think so. Especially my time. My time is kind of out. Time to me is…you know, we can stretch it and do whatever we want with it. And Fred… You know how Fred is. Whoo-hoo.

TP:  Fred Hersch is the specialist in duos.

KING:  He’s a duo specialist. He is. And that’s my specialty. I’ve sung with big bands, the Metropole Orchestra of Holland, and Ray Brown Quintet, and I’ve been with some of the greatest big aggregations of musicians ever.

TP:  Not to mention shows and studio things. You’re all-around professional musician.

KING:  Absolutely. I did a thing for Tim Weston, who is Paul Weston and Jo Stafford’s son, down in Los Angeles. He’s a wonderful writer and composer. He’s putting out an album of Rodgers & Hammerstein songs. There was this one song, and the thing had already been played, and nobody could sing it. It was written by Van Dyke Parks. He was the arranger for this song. It was called “Everybody’s Got a Home But Me.” It was an obscure song from one of their hits that never made it. But it’s a great song with this arrangement; it was like “Holy…” I had to have him sing it — and he’s a bad singer. He said, “Nancy, I can’t sing it.” I said, “I don’t care. I have to know where to come in. I can do this, but I have to know where one is. I can’t find it.” For me not to find one, that’s kind of weird. So he sent me the vocal, I learned it in a day, he flew me to L.A. The orchestra has already recorded it. I had to make it sound like I was there, recording with the orchestra. I did the first take. He said, “You want to do it in sections?” I said, “Tim, I’ll come and do this with you if you’ll take me up to meet your mother.” Because Jo Stafford is one of my greatest idols. He said, “Okay.” So that was the deal. I was getting paid to do this, but my pay was to go meet Jo Stafford. This was four years ago, maybe three.

TP:  How did the meeting turn out?

KING:  Oh, she’s so wonderful. And she’s right there. There was no, “Eh, who are you?” She was having a drink, it was the afternoon, and we finished the session… I cut the tune in the first take. I want you to know that. He said, “Do you want to do this in sections?” I said, “Well, let me see if I can get all the way through it once.” That was the take. I look in the booth, and he and his engineer are jumping up and down. They couldn’t believe it! But it was easy. Once I knew where one was, that’s what I do! My ears heard it, and away I went.

[MUSIC: “Little Suede Shoes” & “Day By Day”, NANCY KING-FRED HERSCH]

TP:  Spontaneously conceived, “Little Suede Shoes” and “Day by Day”…

KING:  We call that a two-fer.

TP:  You’ll be flying back to Portland, your home, tomorrow. Do you work steadily in Portland?

KING:  I do. We have a club where we play every Friday, when I’m in town. My regular pianist is Steve Christofferson; he’s been with me for 28 years. We were here last year. We played at the Duplex.

TP:  He’s your duo partner. Is that what you like doing the most?

KING:  Yes. I think it’s the most exciting. I mean, I love to sing with orchestras and big bands.

TP:  There’s no safety net in a duo, is there.

KING:  I won’t mention the famous person’s name. But I’ve been offered a few contracts for large amounts of money…but money, I’ve liked it very much…obviously, that’s why I don’t have any. But even when I was a little kid, people would give me money, and I would run and put it in my piggybank, and then I’d go wash my hands. I was like Howard Hughes when I was like 5! But there was something about money. It stunk, it made my hands smell, and I just thought it was dirty. Money was dirty to me. When you think about it, especially these days… But we have to have money to live and pay our rent and things like that. So it’s a means to an end to me. It’s always been. But when people offer me contracts, they know I’m starving to death, and they’re dangling this $300,000 in my face, and saying… I’m going, “Well, what do you want? All you have to do is fix my teeth and my knees, and I’m good for another 20 years.” They’re going, “Well, do you scat on everything?” They turn to each other and go, “She even scats on ballads.” “Yes, I know.” “Well, we want you to not scat. Just save that for special stuff. And we want you to not play duos any more.” I said, “Well, just take me out in the hall and shoot me in the head then. Right now.”

TP:  So those are the non-negotiable points?

KING:  Uh-huh. I’ve never been able to stand anyone telling me what to do, especially with my music. Because it’s mine. And I’ve refused them. Even though I would have loved to have had that money. I could have maybe bought a new car or something…had a house or something.

TP:  Do you write any of your songs?

KING:  I’ve only written two songs in my life, because I don’t have a piano in my house. I think of stuff all the time, but I don’t have any way to put it down. I’m an interpreter. I like to sing your song. I like to sing the beautiful songs of the day. New songs. People write stuff and send them to me all the time, and sometimes they’re wonderful. I give them to Steve, because I can’t read, you know. I don’t know G-minor from… He’ll play it for me, and we decide if we like it, and then we’ll do it. But I’m really not concerned with trying to write music. But I’ve got great arrangement ideas in my head. I hope some day soon… Maria Schneider is one of my friends, and I…

TP:  Also from the wide-open spaces.

KING:  We really are going to try to do a project together sometime soon.

TP:  Are you primarily a devotee of what’s known as the Songbook? Also, who are the lyricists you feel most connected to?

KING:  Well, I love Duke. I grew up with Fats Waller and Duke, and they were my Dad’s favorite. All those wonderful records. See, I learned everything I know from listening. My Dad had some Ella, and he had Sarah Vaughan, and of course, I was listening to Rachmaninoff and Schubert over here with my mother’s music.

TP:  But lyricists?

KING:  I like to find tunes that nobody does any more. Beautiful songs. Meredith D’Ambrosio is like that. She finds tunes that are obscure…

TP:  Undeservedly obscure.

KING:  That’s the word. “Undeservedly.” I’ve got a new three-fer that Steve and I just recorded, which is “When The World Was Young,” which is a beautiful song that nobody does any more, “Young and Foolish,” another song that nobody does any more, and “This Couldn’t Happen Again.” Oh, it’s so beautiful.

            That’s what I’m about at this point. I did my homework. Really, I did. I learned as many tunes… I was lucky enough, in the year-and-a-half that I did go to the U. of Oregon…. There was a wonderful man there named Sam Reynolds. We called him “the deacon,” because his glasses would always… He was a piano player, and he was there doing postgraduate work. But he had those three fake books, those original fake books. Horrible. Most of the changes were all wrong, and half the tune was missing, and all this stuff. In that first year, we’d meet at 4 o’clock up in the same building where they had the food fight in Animal House… Upstairs there were practice rooms, and we would go up there from 4 o’clock til dinner time, going through this book and playing every tune. He took me from, “A, you’re adorable, B, you’re so beautiful…”  “Why are we learning this? I’m never going to sing this. Oh, well, what the hell?” So we’d learn it anyway. And we went to, “Zing, went the strings of my heart.” We went through those three volumes. I went through every tune in there, because he could play them, and he’d go, “Oh, that’s not the right change. Let’s see here. That sounds better, yeah.” So I think learning the music first, and then the lyrics were second to me also. The music was the first thing I learned.  I could sing something back off the radio. And my harmonic ear is about twice as good as my regular ear.

TP:  Do you need time to form a point of view on a lyric before you sing it?

KING:  Well, I have to like it. Usually, it’s something I’ve heard and I like…

TP:  But do you study the text of the lyric, as it were?

KING:  No. I just sing it. And I try to put the feeling in it that I have for the song, and present it to you, or whomever, as my interpretation of this song, why I love this song. Because I don’t sing songs I don’t like. I’m sorry, I haven’t learned so many songs that were popular. People say, “Do you do…?” Unh-uh. I never learned it. Not because I didn’t like it. After I heard what’s-her-mug do it, I just went, “I’m not going to learn that. I couldn’t improve on that.”

TP:  In your repertoire, how many songs have been written within the last thirty years, and how many were written before 1970, say?

KING:  Most of my stuff is…

TP:  Pre-1970?

KING:  I mean, my parents… That’s what I grew up listening to, were the masters of the music. But my dad had great taste.

TP:  What’s his name?

KING:  John Whalley, Sr.

TP:  How about your mom?

KING:  Helen Marion Watson. She was on the road playing professionally, and she’d play at night… Her concert-master, when she married my dad, he sent her for a wedding present the Steinway that she learned to play on. I was supposed to get that piano, and I was supposed to get the farm, too, but my brother and sister made it so that I didn’t get it. My brother is the piano player in the family, so the day my dad I think took his last breath, he drove the truck out there and loaded the piano up, and took it back to California, where they live. But anyway… Whoopie-doo!

TP: Is there going to be a memoir?

KING:  I hope so.

[MUSIC: “There’s A Small Hotel”]

Leave a comment

Filed under Nancy King, Singers, Uncategorized, WKCR

For guitarist-vocalist Lionel Loueke’s 52nd birthday; a 2018 profile in Jazz Times, a 2008 interview for www.jazz.com; a 2017 Downbeat profile with Chick Corea; a 2009 Downbeat Blindfold Test; and a 2005 short profile for Downbeat

Out of Africa

For his latest album, Lionel Loueke takes on the subject of 21st-century migration and reckons with his own winding artistic path

By Ted Panken

“You don’t just choose to get on a boat because you want to live in Europe. It’s because you have nothing else to lose. Many people in the West don’t get that point.”

“If you don’t take risks, you don’t get anything back. If you don’t believe it, you can’t expect anyone else to believe it.”

In early October, just after concluding two concerts in Kuwait City with Herbie Hancock and two weeks before embarking on a month of European one-nighters with Dave Holland’s Aziza quartet, Lionel Loueke was on the phone from Switzerland. The subject was his 2018 release, The Journey (Aparté), which contains 15 of the guitarist/singer’s compositions. Some are instrumental, but on most Loueke applies his lilting tenor to lyrics in Fon, French, Mina, and Yoruba, all languages spoken in his homeland, Benin, on the Atlantic coast of equatorial Africa.

“I was thinking about this project for a long time,” said Loueke, who’d spent the day teaching at the Jazz Campus of Musik Akademie Basel. “I wanted to do an acoustic, melody-oriented project that mixed all my influences from the beginning to where I am today, combining classical musicians and instruments with traditional instruments from Africa and jazz musicians in the most organic possible way.”

The album’s title is as multi-layered as its contents. On one level, it’s about why so many Africans have decided to leave their homes and take the perilous journey to Europe—and the stark conditions they face upon arrival. Loueke frames this story of modern migration within a succession of lovely melodies, orchestrated by Robert Sadin, a favored collaborator of Herbie Hancock (Gershwin’s World) and Wayne Shorter (Alegría), and interpreted by a cohort of virtuosos from the U.S., Europe, Brazil, the Caribbean, and West Africa.

On another level, The Journey also traces Loueke’s path as an artist, which began in Cotonou, Benin’s capital, where he spent much of his teens as a dancer and percussionist, as referenced in the opening track, “Bouriyan.” (The song is named for an Afro-Brazilian carnival rhythm in Ouidah, the hometown of his mother, a schoolteacher and the descendant of emancipated slaves who settled there after leaving Brazil at the turn of the 19th century.) At 17, already familiar with traditional music through his grandfather, a village singer, Loueke began playing his older brother’s guitar, using bicycle cable for strings.

“I was thinking about how to get the sound of the kora or kalimba or djembe, which are not chromatic, on the guitar, but I also got involved in Occidental music playing rock and blues,” Loueke recalled. “At first, I thought everything was just part of the song, because in Africa you sing, then you play, and then you have the verse. When I discovered they were improvising, I became curious. The first time I heard B.B. King, the way he bent the notes reminded me of a three-string instrument in the north of Benin. I could hear where it came from.”

In 1990, Loueke—whose parents were advocating a career as a mathematician or doctor—left Cotonou to study harmony and ethnomusicology at the National Institute of Arts in Ivory Coast, where he first connected to Bach and Stravinsky. In 1994, he moved to Paris for four years of jazz studies; he then matriculated to Berklee on a scholarship, remaining in Boston for another three years. In 2001, a panel including Hancock, Shorter, Terence Blanchard, and Charlie Haden—each a future Loueke employer—admitted the guitarist to the Thelonious Monk Institute in Los Angeles. And in 2003, after more than a decade of formal education, Loueke finally felt prepared to enter the fray as a professional.

Fifteen years on, Loueke, now 45, is a singular figure in jazz and world music circles. Peers and elders deeply respect his individualism; his rhythmic capabilities and exhaustive harmonic knowledge; his ability to sing in one meter and play in another; the way he transforms the guitar into a virtual Afro-Western orchestra through techniques that evoke instruments like the kalimba (by muting his strings with crepe paper) and the talking drum (with help from his DigiTech Whammy pedal). He’s written several popular compositions, most famously “Benny’s Tune,” which Blanchard debuted in 2003. And his improvisations evoke a global array of associations: King Sunny Adé and Tabu Ley Rochereau, George Benson and Wes Montgomery, Derek Bailey and Bill Frisell.

You can get a sense of Loueke’s imagination at its most rampant on Close Your Eyes (Newville), last year’s freewheeling run through eight standards with bassist Reuben Rogers and drummer Eric Harland. It’s an apropos successor to his final two albums for Blue Note, which signed him in 2008: Heritage (2012), an Afrofolkloric hardcore/jazz hybrid featuring keyboardist/co-producer Robert Glasper, bassist Derrick Hodge, and drummer Mark Guiliana; and Gaia (2015), a rock-oriented recital with longstanding trio partners Massimo Biolcati on bass and Ferenc Nemeth on a uniquely configured drumkit made up of West African percussion instruments.

Even before those Blue Note dates, Loueke and Robert Sadin had been discussing a song-oriented project. They didn’t pull the trigger until 2015, when Loueke, in New York for a Carnegie Hall concert with Benin-born singer and frequent collaborator Angélique Kidjo, invited Sadin to hear some demos. The first song was “Bawo,” with a lyric in Yoruba that translates: “How have we come to this? / Modern-day slavery / And climate disruption push / Humanity to the roads of exile.” As recorded on The Journey, Loueke accompanies himself with keening blues lines, propelled by Beninese percussionist Christi Joza Orisha’s talking drums, Pino Palladino’s dancing bassline, and Sadin’s painterly keyboards.

“Robert loved ‘Bawo’ and asked me to send more, so I kept writing and composing,” Loueke said. “We had enough music for a double album, but we chose tunes that best fit the project. Then he came up with the greatest idea—I’d play by myself in the studio for three days. I’d never done anything like that. I had thoughts, but not a clear conception of what I wanted to do. He just let me record, and I came up with ideas that we developed.”

“The key was starting every single song with Lionel playing alone,” said Sadin, who previously produced Loueke’s 2008 album Virgin Forest. “Lionel is so sensitive to other musicians, the nuance in his timing is so great, that he will intuitively adjust himself to and harmonize with the sensibilities and timing of whoever he plays with. It’s like breathing for him. He can’t not do it. I wanted this to be pure, unadorned, with no thought except himself, and we would work everything else around it, including some overdubs from him.”

Loueke had the option to record a fifth album for Blue Note, but Sadin steered him to Aparté, a purist classical label whose roster includes clarinetist Patrick Messina, who’d first performed with Loueke in a Sadin-led septet at the Savannah Music Festival in 2011. That septet also featured percussionist Cyro Baptista, violinist Mark Feldman, and cellist Vincent Ségal, who all contribute to The Journey. According to Sadin, “Aparté wanted to start doing non-classical music that harmonized with their catalog, and they asked me for several names. I told them to start with Lionel. So did Patrick. I sent the owner a demo of ‘Vi Gnin,’ and he said, ‘Fine, that’s our guy—fantastic.’”

Asked why he advocated for Loueke, Sadin gathered his thoughts. “It was a subterranean, global response,” he said. “Leaving aside the giants of the older generation, Lionel is perhaps the single most compelling musician I know. He plays jazz—jazz is a large part of his life—but he’s not a jazz artist; he’s himself.”

Midway through the 2010s, in response to television news images from Africa, Europe, and the waters between—images of shattered vessels, drowned corpses, and squalid refugee camps—Loueke began writing songs like “Bawo” and “Vi Gnin” (“My child, do not cry / War has taken your mother away / Like the wind carries off the roses / Do not worry, she is watching over you”). “I wanted to present a strong musical statement,” he said, “something quieter and gentler than Gaia but delivering the same intense message about how we as humans are taking care of the planet. The idea is a wake-up call to anybody who listens.”

For Loueke, whose move to Europe 25 years ago transpired under very different circumstances, the subject of migration is personal. “I was lucky I didn’t have to take a ship to get to the West,” he said. “It takes courage to jump in a ship, knowing you might die in the ocean. To take such an action means you have no more hope where you’re living. Many people in the West don’t get that point. You don’t just choose to get on a boat because you want to live in Europe. It’s because there’s a war, or there is no more food, or there is modern slavery where you’re living—and you have to get out. You have nothing else to lose. You’d rather die in the ocean than be killed by somebody.”

In the face of such desperation, choosing optimism is difficult, but “Vi Gnin,” “Bawo,” “The Healing,” and—reimagined from Heritage—“Hope (Espoir)” are optimistic nonetheless. “If there’s no more hope, there’s no more life,” Loueke said. “So you keep going because you have a hope, and that’s how you can see a better living situation in the future.”

The guitarist was “in a classical state of mind” when conceiving The Journey’s rubato version of “Hope,” on which Messina’s clarinet and Ségal’s cello interact with his haunting vocal. Similarly, on “Vi Gnin” (where Baptista and Orisha gently complement his acoustic guitar) and “Reflections on Vi Gnin” (a pensive solo instrumental distinguished by spacious volume-pedal swells), he uses “just open triads that you hear a lot in classical music; I’m not playing jazz chords.” He also ascribes classical roots to “Gbêdetemin,” played with Baptista and Orisha, and the kinetic “Molika,” with John Ellis on soprano sax and Baptista on berimbau.

“For me, it’s a great idea to embrace classical music with what I do,” Loueke said. “It opens up my music, and gives classical listeners a different approach. I don’t want to be in a box. I never wanted to play the same thing twice or stay in the same zone.”

Massimo Biolcati and Ferenc Nemeth met Loueke soon after his arrival at Berklee. “Lionel already had something nobody had heard before,” Biolcati recalled. “He was mixing his traditional African guitar style with jazz, and his sense of rhythm was so far beyond anybody in his age group that people were always blown away. He could hear all the West African polyrhythms simultaneously—one day, he’d come in with a tune and count it off in three, the next day he’d do it in four or six.”

“I heard a lot of George Benson influence,” Nemeth said. “He’d learned all of Benson’s solos by heart, because nobody told him it was a solo. In Africa, it’s part of the culture to learn everything in the song. Of course, he already had the African thing, and I played him a lot of music from Hungary and Eastern Europe, things in seven, nine and 11, and classical music by Bartók and Kodály. One time in Hungary he played a concert with Herbie before thousands of people, and in the middle of a solo he played a folk song that my mom taught him before the concert. He’s like a sponge; he hears something, and he can pick it up and incorporate it into his playing.”

The three entered the Monk Institute together, and practiced incessantly. “That’s when he bloomed and created the whole entity of Lionel Loueke,” Nemeth said.

Initially at Berklee, Loueke remarked, “I was trying to learn the jazz tradition, and understand it—to sound like them. Then I started listening to myself, and it was my first hint that I had a different way of playing. We’re all influenced by somebody else, but at some point you have to be yourself.”

While in Los Angeles, Loueke accelerated the process by eschewing guitar picks for a four-finger approach. “I took classical guitar lessons for a year with a great teacher, just to get the right hand technique and sound, though I was playing a jazz guitar,” he said. “Then I bought a classical guitar and focused on that for a year. It was like relearning the instrument. With the pick I had technique, but now I had none. I did it because I saw what I would gain by playing with fingers and nails: being able to play rhythms and counterpoint, and not always playing one or two notes at a time.

“Of course, playing with Herbie for so many years helped me to visualize the instrument differently. He explores new territory every moment. This is the only person I know who plays soundcheck exactly like he’s at the gig, sometimes for several hours. I’ve learned not to be afraid to try new things.

“I’m a risk-taking person,” Loueke added. “A mistake is just for the moment—make it the best mistake it can be, and that’s it. Sometimes a mistake speaks to me strongly, so the first thing I do after the gig is pick up my guitar and revisit it, develop it, make it something I might use. If you don’t take risks, you don’t get anything back. If you don’t believe it, you can’t expect anyone else to believe it.”

Nemeth cosigned Loueke’s self-assessment. “Any time I play something different, he looks at me like, ‘Wow, that’s a new thing I didn’t hear—let’s go for it.’ He’s fearless. That’s what took him out of Benin. That’s what took him on this journey.”

****************

Lionel Loueke (Orvieto, Dec. 31, 2008):

TP:   Three years ago, you said that if you could only take six months off…

LIONEL:   [LAUGHS]

TP:   …you could work on this thing you were hearing, and the next stage. I have a feeling that hasn’t happened.

LIONEL:   It hasn’t happened, and I’m still looking for it. Now I’m not looking for six months. Now I’m looking for like a month to stop with.

TP:   It seems to have been endless work, a lot of it with Herbie Hancock and developing this trio… Let me ask this. Is the trio you’re working with this week Gilfema, or is Gilfema a different entity than the Lionel Loueke Trio. Talk about how the two are different and similar.

LIONEL:   We use Gilfema when we play music from everyone. We have a CD out under Gilfema. When we play the Lionel Loueke Trio, it’s only my music, or I just call it… Maybe I play their tunes, but I’m the one calling the tunes, pretty much. That’s the main difference. But otherwise, it’s the same guys.

TP:   I know Gilfema has a new record. But has it been playing?

LIONEL:   No, not really. We only did one gig in Paris at the end of my tour with Herbie, and then we have one gig in Boston. So we don’t play that much.

TP:   Next year, you’re going to be doing more of your own projects, you were telling me.

LIONEL:   Yes. Next year, I think Herbie is not keeping me busy, so I have more free time to do my own thing. So basically, from March to May, we’ll be touring—all of March in Europe, the Lionel Loueke Trio.

TP:   Let’s talk about the new Blue Note record. Did it take you a long time to put together? It can’t pinpoint this assertion, but it seems more layered than your previous recording. Of course, having Herbie Hancock and Wayne Shorter on it doesn’t hurt, but it’s not just them.

LIONEL:   I always like to take different directions. It all depends on the moment, what I’m working on or how I feel connected to the music. Karibu definitely is different than Virgin Forest. Virgin Forest was a more produced record. We did some overdubs…I recorded some tracks with musicians in Africa, and even overdubbed some of the stuff. But Karibu is all played in a live context. So the idea for me was, the way I play on stage is pretty much the way I wanted my CD to sound. Just the organic part of it. It’s not perfect. It’s just what it is.

TP:   Did you write new compositions for it? There are two standards, of course.

LIONEL:   Yes, because the Blue Note people asked me to do it. The title, “Karibu,” was new. “Xala” was new. I don’t remember what else was new… But also, I wanted to play standards, because I like standards. I did “Skylark” and “Naima” with Wayne.

TP:   When did you go into the studio to record it?

LIONEL:   Karibu I recorded in September. I remember that because my son was born the same week, the first week of September 2007, and it came out at the end of March.

TP:    A lot of your work over the prior two years had been in the context of Herbie Hancock’s various bands. You met him in 2001, but you started playing with him in 2004?

LIONEL:   Yes.

TP:   And you’ve worked with him in what, five different contexts?

LIONEL:   Oh, yes, always different. From the summer, we did a tour in the fall which was a completely different band. He always likes to change. And he’s Herbie Hancock! He can do whatever he wants or with whom he wants.

TP:   Can you speak to how playing with him has affected your attitude, whether towards presentation, towards musical content. During the summer, I heard you doing your solo feature on “Seventeen” before 10,000 people, and you were playing before these large audiences constantly. I don’t think Terence Blanchard was playing in those kind of venues.

LIONEL:   No.

TP:   Talk about doing what you do in these less intimate contexts.

LIONEL:   Basically, I’m still learning with Herbie, because obviously he knows how to manage those big rooms. For me it’s a big challenge. Every gig he always gives me space to play a solo piece. So to play a solo in front of 20,000 or 2,000 or 3,000 is a big difference, and especially when the audience is far back. I like to feel the vibe from the audience. I learned with Herbie that once you’re out there, you just have to focus and do the best you can, whether there’s two people or 15,000. Musically, I’m learning so much, and that’s the reason I don’t want to stop playing with Herbie, because not only is he giving me so much space, but also the way he carries the whole band and the way he plays differently night to night to me is a real lesson. Besides that, just who he is as a human being and what he’s been doing, all those things affect my playing and my writing as well.

TP:   Give me an example.

LIONEL:   My writing lately has been very different. Especially on the last tour, we played music by Wayne Shorter, and Herbie also did a new arrangement of “Speak Like A Child,” on which he did an introduction, and playing that every night opened my ears to different… For all of us. We all did writing on the road. Everybody, Terence, Kendrick, everybody was doing writing. It’s so inspiring to see how Herbie developed that introduction every single night. Basically, what I’m trying to do now is, what you compose is pretty much a delay of what you play on live. I’m really trying to get that same kind of vibe when I compose, and not think too much, but at the same time get that freshness.

TP:   When you were a young guy, assimilating influences, were you listening to Herbie Hancock’s music, or did that not come until later?

LIONEL:   The only thing… I heard something when I started music, but I had no idea it was Herbie Hancock. I was doing the break dance thing. But I didn’t even know it was him. So I was definitely not familiar with his music. I was playing “Cantaloupe Island” or “Watermelon Man,” but I had no clue who wrote them.

TP:    Were you playing those songs with African bands.

LIONEL:   Exactly. My older brother was playing. They had a band, and they were playing those songs. So when I started learning, they taught me those songs, so I was playing without knowing who wrote them.

TP:   When did you start to get familiar with his…

LIONEL:    When I moved to Paris, when I went to the American school, then I started to get familiar with him, Wayne, Miles, Coltrane, all those people.

TP:   I didn’t see the fall tour, only heard it, but I heard the summer tour, which was almost like an arena show. You have a lot of different roles apart from solo feature. Can you speak about your interplay?

LIONEL:   As I said, we’re always playing something different. The summer was more a tour for his record, The River, and pretty much what I did on the CD was more like color, just playing my way, not always playing, but always trying to find the right moment to interact. But the last tour was different, because we had no singer, so it was more playing-oriented, so my function was still doing the same thing, but more open compared to what I was doing in the summer. But playing with him is the greatest thing. When I finish playing with Herbie, either listening to a piano player or playing with a piano player is always hard, because I start hearing some stuff naturally, and then I realize it’s not him. Because with him, it’s always challenging. When I finish a tour with Herbie and start listening to other piano players, it’s always hard. I don’t know how to describe it. But there’s something… The only person for me that I listen to after Herbie that makes me feel the same is Brad Mehldau. I listen to Mehldau, he’s very strong, he has his own thing, but after Mehldau or McCoy or people like that, it’s very hard.

TP:   You were playing solo concerts opening for Mehldau and for Roy Haynes a few years ago, in 2005, and you also played trio with Herbie and Wayne…

LIONEL:   Yes, in Japan.

TP: Which must have factored into your concept for Karibu .

LIONEL:   Yes, that helped me a lot. Because when he asked me for the record, I wasn’t nervous because of that trio thing that we did, so I had some ideas already of where this can go, and for my own thing, music I wrote… Like, “Lights Dark,” which features both of them. I wrote it definitely having both of them in mind. Very open.

TP:   Did the title denote in any way your sense of the way they play, the contrasts…

LIONEL:   Exactly. Wayne Shorter is one of my favorite composers of all time, and if you listen to Wayne’s melodies, you can sing them all day long. The harmony may be complex, but supporting the melody in the right way. For me, that’s exactly what I tried to get on that tune. The melody was very simple and the harmony can go anywhere.

TP:   Last night it was my impression that you only prepared the strings once. You took out paper, covered it, and got a kalimba sort of sound. But other than that, all the sounds were extracted from the pedals and your hands. Are you preparing the guitar less now? Was that just last night?

LIONEL:   I just feel like people start thinking about me in one context, but I don’t want to lock myself into one thing. Most people think about the way I play the African thing and the paper—which is great. That’s what I do. That’s who I am. But I don’t want to lock myself in just that one direction. I still want to play standards, still want to do everything, but still be me.

TP:   But it seemed you were getting those sounds without preparing the guitar.

LIONEL:   Oh, yes.

TP:   Have you been working on that?

LIONEL:   Yes, that’s something I’ve definitely been trying to do, without the paper. The paper thing gives me one sound. I want to be able to switch between the normal sound and the mute sound, so I started working on how to mute without the paper, where the sound won’t be the same, but it will be close.

TP:   You were pointing to your palm. Apart from being interdependent with both hands, do you have interdependence between the muscles in each hand?

LIONEL:   Exactly. That’s where I’m getting now. I can come from legato, I can go to staccato and mute, everything, without putting paper in. If I need the paper, like I did yesterday for one tune, I do it. But the rest, I can do it in a different way.

TP:   When you say that you need time off to work on your concept, it would seem that when you’re on the road with Herbie, you do have a lot of time?

LIONEL:   Oh, no! Because Herbie’s tour… Well, the fall tour, the last one was a little easier, but most of the tours we play five, six, sometimes nine gigs in a row in different cities, so there’s no break, meaning you have to wake up at 5. There’s no time to practice. But when I have a day off… We had a day in Turkey, in Istanbul, and some people went out. I preferred just to lock myself in and write music, because that’s the only time I have, really. But even if I go out, I always find time to write music.

TP:   If you had that ever-elusive month off, how would you practice? How much is physical? How much is thinking?

LIONEL:   I think definitely it would be more physical. I am thinking constantly anyway. The way I am hearing my playing, the way I want it to be is… I am getting close to the piano context, where my playing is getting harmonically supported by myself at the same time, and have the righ technique to play melody and harmony, and make them very clear sometimes, make them very confused sometimes. But that for me requires a lot of practicing. Because I have a different tuning, there’s a lot I have to learn for my own tuning, and I need time… I can hear those things in my head, but they’re not in my fingers. I need to put them in my fingers.

TP:   What struck me the most when I talked to you three years ago is your patience, your ability not to do something before its time. You studied thirteen years before hitting the scene. The temptations must have been great. I’m sure there were times you were just eating noodles because you weren’t working.

LIONEL:   Oh, yeah.

TP:   It’s hard for people to talk about their character. But tell me a little bit. Have you always been this patient?

LIONEL:   Yeah. There are two things. First, I always want to push my limit. I always want to get to something else. Even if I take a month off, even if I take six months off, I still want to find something else. The second thing is, I am always looking for new things for myself, because somehow on standards I get a little bored. I always try to find a new direction harmonically, melodically, technically, on the instrument. Now I’m less patient than I used to be. Before I knew that this is my goal, and I take whatever time it takes, I’m going to get it. Now I have more pressure, doing gigs on my own, I have two kids—so I have less time to accomplish those things. So I feel more like I don’t want to waste my time.

TP:   You could eat noodles, but you can’t make them do that.

LIONEL:   Exactly. But at the same time… For example, I’m here for a week. Normally I would come by myself, and that’s the perfect time for me to do something. But I haven’t seen my family for three months. So I am less patient than I used to be.

TP:   But also, you’re playing with someone who is a great virtuoso, but seems not to unduly sweat over the things you worry about.

LIONEL:   Yes, definitely.

TP:   I wonder if that’s had an effect on you.

LIONEL:   Definitely. I’ve asked him many times how he does it, and he always tells me he used to practice a lot. He told me, “I practiced for hours and hours. Of course, now I don’t practice, but I practice a lot in my head.” I practice in my head, too. But he is able to just put it out, because he has practiced for many hours and has it in his fingers. I don’t.

TP:   Well, your concept is also about extended techniques. Trying to be interdependent with your thumb and fingers involves muscle memory. Herbie Hancock’s muscle memory has been there since 6. He’s not playing like Cecil Taylor.

LIONEL:   Yes. He’s thinking more harmonically and melodically and different type of colors. I’m thinking of that less, but I’m thinking more about the technique, how I can divide the whole instrument like mutes, be able to make the bass strings, the four lower strings, and open the higher strings—or vice-versa—so that when you hear my playing you hear some very legato and mute at the same time. I know it’s possible. Even if I haven’t heard anybody do it, I know it is possible, because when I try, sometimes it comes out. But it doesn’t come out every time. [23 – 23:40]

TP:   What music are you listening to lately?

LIONEL:   Lately, mostly classical. If I go to jazz, I will listen to Wayne most of the time. But I’m listening a lot to classical lately—Ravel, Debussy, Stravinsky, all the contemporary composers. When I listen again to my heroes, Wayne and Herbie, I start hearing those elements, and lately, if I listen to Wayne, what he’s been doing to classical music and classical instruments, complete with the quartet, it’s very inspired.

TP:   Do you ever go back and listen to African music, or is it something that’s just there because it was so much of your early…

LIONEL:   I can’t say that I listen to it that much. But I do sometimes on my IPod… I know pretty much everything on my Ipod, but if somebody gives me some CDs or stuff, I’ll put them on. I have some tapes from back home that, when I feel like, I listen to, but it’s mostly pure traditional, just percussionists and voice or just percussion. I listen to those things. The last six months, I haven’t.

TP:   You did the concert with Richard Bona, which was a very interesting concert.

LIONEL:   The first time I played with him was with Jeff Tain Watts, trio, at the Jazz Gallery. Then he invited me to the Montreal Jazz Festival, where he was the guest for a week. From that, we said, “Well, maybe we should play a duo concert.”

TP:   It was interesting, because your personalities are so different.

LIONEL:   Oh yeah. We’re very different. But it works because the African element is very strong, we both know the rules… That concert for me, I had fun, because it was two different musicians with their own thing but at the same time have something in common. We didn’t have to explain. Usually, when you play that type of music, you have to explain to people, “This is one.” But with him… [LAUGHS] We have the same one! Usually when I play with people, they have their one, I have my one, and it doesn’t matter—it works. But with him, the one is the same, because we feel it the same way.

TP:   One thing you were doing three years ago that you don’t do so much now, because of time constraints, was playing a lot more on the New York scene. You were playing with Avishai Cohen’s African project, Yosvany, so many people.

LIONEL:   I miss that, I have to say. The main reason I moved to New York was to do that, and I knew that if I started getting busy it would be hard to do it, and plus, once you start playing the clubs, playing a gig at the Jazz Standard under your name, they don’t want you to go back and play at the Jazz Gallery under your name. Those little things. I didn’t really think about it before, but now everything is contract. You have to wait six weeks to play. So it makes it hard. That’s one thing. The second thing is I’m not there any more like I used to be. Between Herbie’s tour and this I was home for a week, and after here I go home for not even a week, and then I’m out again to play in Boston with the Gilfema project. Then I’m going home, taking ten days, to see my parents in Cotonou. But when I’m in New York, I would love to do it. But also, when I’m there for 3 or 4 days and I haven’t seen the family for three months, it is hard to tell your wife, “Ok, I am going into the city to play.”

TP:   Then also, you miss so much with your kids.

LIONEL:   Exactly. I miss that, definitely. So I try to stay home when I’m home.

TP:   But in 2009, you won’t be out so much with Herbie. You’ll be touring Europe in March and April with the Lionel Loueke Trio.

LIONEL:   Yes. In February we go to New Orleans for some dates for ten days or two weeks, and all of March we’ll be in Europe—Spain, Greece, U.K. Then back in the States touring in April as well. So we start getting busy. Miles Winston, my agent, is keeping me busy.

TP:   Is Gilfema going to do things in 2009?

LIONEL:   No. We started with Gilfema, and now Gilfema is kind of dying. The last CD is very much because we owed an optional CD to Obliq Sound. We had to do it. We don’t have any more projects.

TP:   Is that because people are more interested in your name and less in your name, or because they’re doing other things?

LIONEL:   Everybody is busy. When they are not working with me, Massimo is working with Ravi Coltrane or Paquito. So they’re all busy doing their thing, and they all have their own CDs, so that they have their own projects. In May we’re going on the road under Ferenc’s name with other people. So they have their own projects as well.

TP:   You don’t need to be so collective because everybody…

LIONEL:   Everybody is busy. And the thing is, if I cannot keep them busy, they have to work. One thing about those guys is we really love each other besides the music. Even if I’m on the road, we call each other. It’s a real family.

TP:   I can see that at the dinner table. Your daughter was hanging onto Ferenc with spaghetti sauce on her.

LIONEL:   Exactly! We hang a lot together. That’s the thing, and I always see it on stage. That comes out in the music every time we play.

TP:   You’re someone who thinks in the long term. Probably ten years ago, you half-envisioned what you’re doing now, maybe not that you’d be on the road with Herbie Hancock…

LIONEL:   Hoping.

TP:   Where do you see yourself five years from now, when you’re in your forties?

LIONEL:   There are a lot of different projects I would love to do. I don’t want to lock myself in one…

TP:   You had a string project a few years ago. I haven’t seen that yet.

LIONEL:   That’s coming, and it will definitely be the result of all of the classical things I’m listening to now. Something I want to write for string quartet, plus the trio. That project definitely will come out.

TP:   On the model of Wayne and Imani Winds.

LIONEL:   Yes. I want to find guys who can at the same time improvise in a way that there’s a real interaction between the trio, or duo, or whatever it is going to be, with the quartet. Because what I hear most of the time when people do that project, they write something specially for the quartet, and then hear the quartet comping. I don’t want that. I want it to be no one is comping for anyone.

I’m also thinking to do another African project, but with the same context. It won’t be classical instruments, but it would be African instruments.

TP:   You’d orchestrate the African instruments.

LIONEL:   Yeah. It would be kora, kalimba, djembe… I want to do that project just with the acoustic guitar.

TP:   You’ve become very accustomed to chromatic playing, and African instruments aren’t chromatic, so the orchestration would be the challenge.

LIONEL:   Exactly. My job will be to find a way. Because one thing I don’t want to do when I use those instruments (that’s why I don’t use them that much) is to have just one scale and one sound that everybody recognizes. That’s one thing. But I’ve started hearing some young African musicians, especially in Paris, who start having like a chromatic kora. That’s something I’ve been looking for a long time, somebody trying to play those instruments in a different way… A friend of mine now is playing chromatic balafon.

TP:   So it’s a new instrument.

LIONEL:   It’s a new instrument, because it’s against the tradition, basically. He cannot play that in the village! But that’s the way I’m seeing African instruments anyway. One thing is to keep what’s already done, what’s there. But now I think it’s time for the young musicians to take it to a different level.

TP:   You’ve led me to the last question I want to ask, which is a complex question, because it has to do with the way you construct your identity as a musician. Which is to say: you were born in Benin, you have ancestors in the village, and your parents are urban intellectuals from the post-colonial period.

LIONEL:   Yes.

TP:   One thing I want to know is the response that your music receives in Africa, if people in Benin are hearing Karibu or your other records, what they think of it, and so on. Then also, how you address the different attitudes or mentalities that are expressed in African cultures and Western cultures, which operate on very different suppositions, have different core aesthetics behind them.

LIONEL:   People in Africa start hearing my music. Every time I go to Benin, I always play a concert, so they start getting familiar with it. But there is always a new element for them. I did a tour last year, I think, in 15 countries in Eastern Africa, just solo guitar. I went to Kenya, Tanzania, and down. But the reaction of people, they see the African element in my playing, but then they see the element they are not familiar with. So just like when I play in Europe or in the United States, you hear something that’s familiar, it’s the same thing going on in Africa when they listen to it. They are not that familiar with it, but they can find their way to what I’m doing with some of their limits—it’s new for them. I like it that way, because my interest is to bring something different as well. I don’t want to do something that is already done for both worlds.

The second element: The way we play in Africa, I never lost that. How the music is related to everyday life and the context, and what you play is definitely to your heart, first of all. When I studied, I almost… In my life, when I was a student… I mean, I’m still a student. But when I was in music school, at one point I almost lost that, started becoming very intellectual in everything I’m playing, because I didn’t understand them, I wanted to understand them, and my heart was not speaking like it should be. But the good thing is, I found the right moment to say, “Wait a minute, I don’t want to lose this natural thing I have from the beginning without understanding anything about harmony.” So I found my way to go back and.. Anyway, I’m never going to be able at this point to be the musician I was before, even if I was the most organic musician ever at that time. But now I can’t be that organic even, because I have some new elements.

TP:   You opened the box.

LIONEL:   Exactly. I just don’t want to lose that. Anything I’m doing has to come from inside, deeply inside.

TP: As a young person, what were the first things you learned in the intellectual history of Western culture. Your father is a mathematician, your mother is a schoolteacher, they grew up under colonialism. What are some of the core principles that were fundamental to you.

LIONEL:   For me, it definitely was Communism. I grew up seeing my mom making…I don’t know how they call it in English… They call it defilés, when you see the military walking, like a march, and you see all the teachers, every… I was a kid, I was doing that, too. If I go to the movie theater, I have to stand up and sing the revolutionary…

TP:   The Internationale.

LIONEL:   Exactly. The funny thing, sometimes Ferenc and I make a joke and we sing. He sings it in Hungarian and I sing it in French. The same melodies. We both grew up under Communism. So those were my first…

TP:   I didn’t know Benin had a Communist government.

LIONEL:   Oh yeah. So those are the first things I learned about Western culture.

TP:   Interesting. You seem more like a son of the Enlightenment than…

LIONEL:   I found my way out quick. I think Communism definitely has a good point, but there’s a lot of things that didn’t work with my…

TP:   Well, you have to conform to the program, among other things.

LIONEL:   Yes. It wasn’t easy. That’s actually how I started music. When I was in high school, we had a band, and at the same time we had two hours per week, every Friday to play music, or, if you choose, to do painting—different activities. But  they all related to Communism. Before you studied, you had to sing and do the military march and everything. Every day. So if I go to the classroom, before I get in the classroom, you have to be in line, sing, do the military march, take your seat…

TP:   Were they Maoist?

LIONEL:   Yeah, it was Maoist.

TP:   So when you got to Paris and saw the French intellectuals who’d been Maoist in the ‘60s, you might have had some thoughts about that.

LIONEL:   Yes, exactly. I don’t want to get into that. But once I got to Paris, Communism was already… It was a different story. I went to Paris in ‘94. So it was gone!

TP:   Was the regime interested in retaining traditional culture or were they trying to eliminate traditional culture?

LIONEL:   Well, they were confused. For the traditional singers and musicians, the government was asking them to compose using those lyrics. So all they were singing was revolutionary words…

TP:   But with the same rhythms and melodies.

LIONEL:   Yeah, it still was traditional. But then we had the other side where we start learning all the revolutionary songs from Eastern Europe, and I know many of those and play them. I could do a record! I still remember. It’s amazing. [LAUGHS]

TP:   Do you have a contract for more recordings with Blue Note?

LIONEL:   Yes. I think I have four.

TP:   So one hopefully will be the string project you described.

LIONEL:   Yes. One hopefully will be a string project. One will be the same project with African instruments. I’d also love to do a record just playing standards, the way I hear them, but swinging. Even if it’s swinging in 7 or 9 or whatever, it will be swinging.

[END OF CONVERSATION]

************

Chick Corea-Lionel Loueke, Blue Note (Sept. 26, 2017) – (Third Edit):

It may well be that no jazz musician has ever conceived, composed music for, led, and performed with more top-notch bands than Chick Corea. Corea’s latest, a co-led septet with drummer Steve Gadd that is presented on Chinese Butterfly (Stretch/Concord), lives up to his high standard. Last February, before the group had ever played before an audience, he convened the personnel—Lionel Loueke, guitar and vocals; Steve Wilson, alto and soprano saxophones and flute; Carlitos Del Puerto, acoustic and upright bass; and Luisito Quintero on an array of percussion instruments—to record the album. They reassembled in late August for a brief tour of Japan, then entered Manhattan’s Blue Note on September 19th for a two-week residence before embarking on a two-month sojourn that traversed the U.S., South America and Europe.

For the first set on September 20th, patrons packed the Blue Note’s 200 seats at $85 a pop. Many looked old enough to have tracked Corea, 76, and Gadd, 71, since the early 1970s, when Gadd propelled the first electric edition of Return To Forever, then such signpost Corea albums as My Spanish Heart, The Leprechaun, The Mad Hatter, Friends, and Three Quartets. They remained fully engaged through a 90-minute performance in which the members—inspired by, as Wilson enthused, Corea’s “bottomless well of imagination” and timbrally expansive, ever-morphing percussion discussion between Gadd and Quintero—fulfilled their collective and soloistic functions with panache, cogency and imagination.

“Chick’s music sort of plays you,” Gadd said the following day. “His stuff brings lots of musical ideas to mind. We didn’t sit down and write the things together, but we’re always trying to come to an agreement musically, and when we do, it feels my input is making sense. It’s amazing to listen to him every night. He’s constantly trying to raise the bar. I’m still as excited to play with him now as I was when we did it years ago. It’s Chick Corea!”

Not least among the evening’s pleasures was the opportunity to witness Loueke interact with Corea in real time, and to springboard off his melodies. “Lionel has that African triplet feel, which I call the ‘source triplet’,” Wilson said. “It’s very different than what we deal with here, and Chick plays off it a lot. It brings a whole other layer of rhythm to Steve’s groove and pocket.”

On September 26th, before the first show, Corea and Loueke joined Downbeat in the Blue Note’s top-floor offices to discuss their evolving relationship.

* * *

DB:   Lionel is the newest member of your musical family.

Corea: We are newly acquainted in the past year. I’d heard Lionel with Herbie, then started listening to his solo records. I was attracted to his wide range, so he immediately came to mind when I was thinking about this band,. Then I thought we should make sure we groove together. I have an interesting relationship with guitar players. Both keyboard and guitar are chordal and comping instruments. I lead the band around with my comping, so the guitarist and I have to coordinate. And this is a bit of a commitment—we’re going to make a record, we’re touring. Lionel came to my place—one day we jammed together; the second day we did my online music workshop. That’s when I wrote the basic tune to “Serenity”—we played those changes and did it that first time, just reading the chart. After that duet, I thought, “This is going to work great.” And it has. The parts seem to fall into place naturally.

I am going to assume, Lionel, that you’ve listened to a lot of Chick Corea during your lifetime.

Loueke:   Yes. [LAUGHS]

Describe your experience at that initial meeting.

.

Loueke:  I was nervous. At the same time, I told myself this is about having fun—be myself, don’t get stressed. And once I got to the maestro’s place, he made me feel so comfortable. When it’s like that, I can deliver and we can have fun. As he said, there’s a natural chemistry. He listens so well, and makes whatever I’m doing sound better, which is the quality of any great musician.

Chick, Isn’t “Wake-Up Call” your arrangement of an improvisation of Lionel’s at the workshop?

Corea:  I think I started an improvisation, so then we did one, and then I said, “Why don’t you start something?” So Lionel began this line, and we improvised with that idea. It stuck in my mind. I asked Bernie Kirsch, my sound engineer, to give me a copy of what we’d just recorded, and it seemed like a great tune. So I put a little structure on it. I didn’t do much to it…

Loueke:   You did magic to it.

Corea:   When we recorded it in the studio, we went over the two or three little sections I wrote, and then we threw it down once. We didn’t get to the end. Then we regrouped and threw it down a second time, and improvised without instructions for 18 minutes. It came out really nice.

Lionel, you’ve been expanding out from your trio with different bands. Apart from your work with Herbie Hancock, there’s a new duo recording with Kevin Hays on piano; another new recording with an Australian band, The Vampires; and another new recording with the Blue Note All Stars. How do these experiences filter into what you do in this band?

Loueke:   Every time I play with different musicians, I try to keep it fresh and learn something. As I move from project to project, from concert to concert, there’s no boundaries, no preconception about what I’m going to play. Then the magic happens—or not. When I’m playing, I’m super happy. By the time I put down my guitar, either I’m happy or not, but at least I gave myself that freedom of trying to discover new things every time.

Corea:   I have a question for Lionel. You’ve developed a guitar technique, make a bunch of different sounds on the guitar, and you’ve developed a rig. What’s your history with the instrument? How did you come to that sound?

Loueke:   Actually, from 9 to 17, when I lived in Benin, I played stick percussion and hand percussion. I was a dancer. I played a lot of traditional music. When I started playing guitar, I put all that African heritage on the side because I was so interested to learn jazz. I’d listen to you guys and think, “What are they doing? What is this?” But even so, when I went to Berklee, my peers, my teachers were telling me I already had my thing, but I wasn’t hearing it because I was trying to play like them. At some point, I decided to listen, and I realized I’d learned something from all those years playing percussion—that it comes out on the guitar. I’m like a frustrated percussion player.

Corea:   So am I. I’m a frustrated drummer.

Loueke:  I used to play the talking drum. I was looking for a way to make the guitar sound like a talking drum. I found a whammy pedal that would let me play one note and use to my foot to bend it, to change the pitch. Back then, I was playing with a pick, and I thought playing with fingers would give me more polyrhythm.

Corea:   How many fingers do you use to pick?

Loueke:   I use four.

Corea:   So you have four picks instead of one. The range of stuff that Lionel gets is one of the amazing things about his performance.

This is a drum-oriented band, incorporating Brazilian, Afro-Cuban, West African and Spanish elements. Chick has a long history playing in Afro-diasporic contexts, going back to your time with Mongo Santamaria in 1960. Lionel is from West Africa, and, as he said, he was “trying to play like them.” It’s as if you’re arriving at a similar spot from opposite directions.

Corea:   Absolutely. The Cubans around Mongo in ’60 or ’61 kept their African heritage very deeply. I felt Cuban. I was learning about Mongo’s religion, about his way in the music. But we were all in New York. I lived here from 1959 to 1976. I connected musically and spiritually with all the different musicians. Every time I come back I’m amazed by the city as a microcosm of the Planet Earth. All the cultures come here and mix. The city sort of represents what we like to do in the band, which is draw from all these different cultures and influences.

In my mind, jazz is a spirit of creativity. As communication has gotten quicker and tighter with the internet and airplane travel, it doesn’t take a century to learn about Bach’s music, or whoever’s music. It’s all available right there. [points to his iPhone.] Creative music happens in every culture. What happened in this phenomenon called America is that Africans and Cubans and Europeans came, it got mixed up, and people like Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington come around, and then it coalesced into something we call “jazz.”

Lionel, you spent something like 11 years of formal study before entering the fray as a well-prepared professional musician. How did arriving in New York affect you?

Loueke:   Well, I thought I was prepared. In New York, the range is huge. There’s so much to learn, new ideas, new talent, so much going on that people don’t even point their eyes or ears into. Sometimes I’m like, “Man, is nobody hearing what I’m hearing? Come on. This is so fresh.”

Corea:   I think it’s about a 10- or 20-year lag in understanding. Something new comes out, and then the public starts to hear it. At first they think it’s weird. The critics pan it. Then the artist keeps going, and after a while nobody goes, “That’s weird.” Stravinsky’s music, Stockhausen’s music, Monk’s music, Cecil Taylor’s music, Trane’s music—they’re all classic now.

Loueke:  Everything is here. For music, there’s no place like New York. It’s so cosmopolitan. There’s a healthy process of learning from each other that you don’t get elsewhere. My first weekend in New York, I met Tain. I met Roy Hargrove. There’s only one place that can happen.

Corea:   I think you ought to name the issue, “New York is the world.”  I started listening to my dad’s 78 recordings of Miles Davis playing with Bird in 1947, when I was 6. My dad played trumpet, and he tried to play like Miles. Then, in 1951, me and my one jazz friend bought Dig, Miles’ album with Jackie McLean. Following Miles’  records after ’51, with Horace Silver, or with Monk and Milt Jackson, I saw that he was sort of the New York of musicians. If New York collects all the musicians of the world, Miles collected all these special musicians. So from early in high school, I had my sights set on New York. In my senior year, I went to one-third of the classes. My parents had bought their first car, a used red Mercury Cougar convertible, and on weekends I’d drive it to New York and go to clubs.

Lionel, did you listen to a lot of records as a young guy in Benin?

Loueke:   Few records, because it was hard to get them. But I was really into guitar players. Somebody would make a cassette, and I’d transcribe by ear whatever I was hearing. You’ve got to put it into context. I had no connection about harmony. I couldn’t explain to you what II-V-I is. I could hear it, but I couldn’t name it.

Corea:   Who were you listening to?

Loueke: Wes [Montgomery]. Tal Farlow. Kenny Burrell. Barney Kessel, Johnny Smith. I found out about most of those guys after I moved to Paris. I’d get the notes, but I had no idea who was playing or what the tunes were. The first concert I played was just my cassette player, and I played exactly the transcriptions.

Corea:   I did the same thing. I had a trio in Boston with this drummer, Joe Locatelli, and a bass player. I’d transcribed a bunch of Horace Silver tunes—not only the tunes, but some of Blue Mitchell’s trumpet solos and all of Horace’s piano solos. I got gigs, and I would play those solos on the piano—and then play my own stuff.

Loueke:   I couldn’t do my own stuff, because I had no clue. I just played back.

Your 2017 CD, The Musician, documents a 2011 residence at the Blue Note when you played with 10 different bands. In 2016, you did 8 weeks there with 15 different bands, including one called Experiments in Electronica, in which you improvised tabula rasa with Marcus Gilmore, Taylor McFerrin and Yosvany Terry.

Corea:  I like that way of making music, having no theme, no preset plan—just go up and see what happens. It’s an adventure. The more people involved, the trickier it gets. You can do it with a duet not so bad. Well, that’s what Lionel and I did. We were just fooling around. I have in mind to do more improvisation like that.

Loueke:  The true magic happens in the unknown. Maestro Chick has written things that will stay with people forever. While we’ve been talking, a saxophonist on the street, downstairs, has been playing “Spain.” We sometimes play “Spain” as an encore, and as soon as we start the melody the whole crowd goes, “Whoo!” That’s what it’s about—composition, and then the development of the composition, which is the unknown. Every day is different.

Corea:   Unless you’re copying something, the unknown is where the composition comes from. What is the imagination? It’s the unknown. You remember a certain line, or a certain sound or melody, or whatever gets said—so now that’s your song. That came from a free improvisation. Fortunately or unfortunately, when an audience hears a group freely improvise without set melodies, they have to be savvy to the interaction of the musicians, because they don’t hear anything familiar. We try to balance our improvisation with the songs, because we don’t like to leave the audience wondering what we’re doing.

The Experiments in Electronica group also addressed the intersection of technology and music, just as Lionel has done in emulating the sound of a talking drum with a whammy pedal.

Corea:   A lot of musicians use MIDI protocol where, with a drumstick or a key or a guitar pluck, you can trigger a sound and its volume and duration to a synthesizer or another instrument. That’s part of what we call technology. But to me, a wider definition is the instrumental technique used to produce the effect. There’s a way you bend notes, a way you move your hands, there’s posture, the kind of instrument you choose—all kinds of technology and “science” goes into that. You train yourself to press a button here, a pedal there, your hand goes like this, and this sound comes out.

Loueke:   Music is sound. Sounds develop through the years. But the key is: How do you choose this one at this moment? If you have only one sound, no problem. That’s what you get. But when you have many sounds, yeah, you can use them, but you’ve got to find them. Which is very hard. When you hear them, it’s now. Then it’s gone.

Corea: It’s a lot of triggers. Do you know the old joke about Johann Sebastian Bach?

Loueke:   No.

Corea:   Someone asked him, “How do you do it?” He said, “I press the right key at the right time.”

You’ve mentioned that every interviewer asks you about Miles Davis, and that perhaps your most consequential lesson from that experience was his insistence to “play yourself.” It’s no cliche to say that you apply that principle to the max with this band.

Corea:  I try to apply that in life. I see that great art is made when the artist is free to try whatever techniques he wants, and combine things any way he wants. That makes life interesting and a joy. I try to live that way as best I can. I don’t always succeed. I would like others to acknowledge my freedom to be myself and try new things any time I want to, and I try to treat other people that way. Then there’s fairness and balance in life.

Loueke:   The way you live comes out through the music somehow. It took me a while personally to learn that and say: Maybe I should look into MY life. That represents who I am, and music is just part of who I am. That’s what I try to do. Like the Maestro said, if I can live better, I’m sure whatever I do will be better. It could be music. It could be anything.

***********************

Lionel Loueke Blindfold Test – 2009:

  1. Mike Moreno, “I Have A Dream” (from THIRD WISH, Criss-Cross, 2008) (Moreno, electric guitar; Kevin Hays, piano; Doug Weiss, bass; Kendrick Scott, drums; Herbie Hancock, composer)

I think somebody definitely from my generation, and has his sound. I can hear, of course, a little Kurt Rosenwinkel influence. But if I’m right, I think it’s Mike Moreno. He has his sound; it’s a really lyrical, warm sound. I love it. Actuallym, the drummer was the first one who caught my attention, not only in the feel, but the way he tunes his drum set is very unique. But the sound of each tone and the feel was so familiar—and now I can see it’s Kendrick. That’s my boy! I love his sound. I love the tune, too, but I don’t know it. I don’t think it’s his original. Mike is definitely one of the great players of this generation. He’s been working with different musicians, especially here in New York. There are only a few guitar players who I heard a lot about, and he’s definitely one of them. 4 stars.

  1. Russell Malone, “Little Darlin’” (from Ray Brown, SOME OF MY BEST FRIENDS ARE…GUITARISTS, Telarc, 2002) (Malone, acoustic guitar; Brown, bass; Geoff Keezer, piano; Kareem Riggins, drums)

I can hear a huge influence of Russell Malone in this player, because of the vibrato at the end of each note. But I don’t think it’s Russell, because I don’t hear the depth, the personality, unless it’s Russell when he was younger. The vibrato of each note, especially at the end of the phrase, makes me feel that there’s also a huge influence from Django The sound reminds me a lot of Jim Hall—he’s placed the mike in front of the guitar. Jim Hall is the master of that. The bass sounds great. That’s a hard tempo to play on! Those medium tempos are the hardest. Also the space between the phrasing is great. 3 stars.

  1. Pat Metheny, “Let’s Move” (from DAY TRIP, Nonesuch, 2007) (Metheny, electric guitar; Christian McBride, bass; Antonio Sanchez, drums)

I can tell right away that this is Pat Metheny. He has definitely his own sound. Whoo! That’s a hard tune—just the head is hard to play! I know Pat not only has a great sense of melody, but also has great chops, but I didn’t know his chops were this huge! That exceeds even his standards. That bass player has crazy technique that I don’t hear that often, especially from acoustic bassists. I think it’s someone I recorded with not too long ago with Angelique Kidjo, Christian McBride, just from that ability to play so fast and so precisely. I could also recognize Antonio Sanchez from his sound; the sound of his drumset is unique, and his playing is clear and precise. 5 stars.

  1. Romero Lubambo, “Loro” (from Trio de Paz, SOMEWHERE, Blue Toucan, 2005) (Romero Lubambo, acoustic guitar; Nilson Matta, bass; Duduka DaFonseca, drums)

I think that’s Romero Lubambo. No, it’s not him. Romero doesn’t play with that kind of aggressive attack. Well, he’s playing on a steel string, so maybe that’s why he’s playing so aggressive. It doesn’t sound like someone who’s used to playing on that instrument. The personality isn’t strong, like someone I’d recognize by one phrase or two phrases. 3 stars.

  1. Mark Ribot, “Fiesta en El Solar” (from Y LOS CUBANOS POSTIZOS, Atlantic, 1998) (Ribot, guitar; Anthony Coleman, keyboards; Brad Jones, bass; Roberto Rodriguez, drums; E.J. Rodriguez, percussion; Arsenio Rodriguez, composer)

That sounds like an African guitar player, like from Congo or Zaire. Oh, the way the rhythm section is playing, those are not Africans.  Is it Santana? No, it’s not Santana’s sound. It’s not Ali Farka Toure. No. What makes me think it’s African is the sound of the guitar. But it doesn’t make sense that an African would play with that rhythm section, and then, it’s a tres. I don’t know any Africans who play tres. The guitar player is probably Cuban. In Africa there’s a few old guitar players who have that tres sound with 12-string guitar or another guitar with different effects. Nothing sticks to me, telling me a strong personality is playing. A lot of different cats from Cuba could play that. 3 stars.

  1. Julian Lage, “Clarity” (from SOUNDING POINT, EmArcy, 2009) (Lage, acoustic guitar; Ben Roseth, saxophone; Aristedes Rivas, cello; Jorge Roeder, bass; Tupac Mantilla, percussion)

This piece is beautiful. It sounds like something I’ve heard before; I’m not sure if it’s an original composition. But the arrangement is outstanding.  The guitar player has a big influence from Pat Metheny, but not a cliched influence, not doing Pat Metheny’s licks. I hear some influences, but he’s being himself. He’s not trying to play like somebody. I can hear the sense of melody. He also gets close to that Jim Hall sound with the mike in front of the hollow-body guitar. The only person I can think of is the young guitar player who played with Gary Burton. I don’t remember his name… Julian Lage. 5 stars just for the arrangement; 4 stars for the whole thing.

  1. John Abercrombie, “How’s Never” (from Gateway Trio, HOMECOMING, ECM, 1994) (Abercrombie, guitar, composer; Dave Holland, bass; Jack DeJohnette, drums)

That’s Dave Holland playing that bassline; not many other bass players can do that kind of odd-metered bassline. That’s John Abercrombie. He’s easily recognizable because of how much he uses the chorus pedal—I can recognize him from that sound. Because he uses the chorus and the way he phrases, he has a long sustain sound. He plays very legato, but at the same time, every time he picks a note, it’s very percussive. Of course, Jack DeJohnette is the drummer. 5 stars. I love the tune.

  1. Lage Lund, “Quiet Now” (from EARLY SONGS, Criss Cross, 2008) (Lund, guitar; Danny Grissett, piano; Orlando LeFleming, bass; Kendrick Scott, drums; Denny Zeitlin, composer)

I have a few names in mind. First, I like the tone of the instrument. The tone of the guitar really touched me. I love the sound of it. It reminds me a little bit of Bireli Lagrene, but at the same time I have some doubts. The other person it reminds me of is Adam Rogers, who plays with Chris Potter and used to play with Michael Brecker. It’s neither of them? I like the tune, and I love the player. There’s a lot of medium range in the sound, and I like it, and I can hear… At the beginning of the tune, I could hear…I still don’t know… it feels like he was playing with fingers, so I heard those notes very close to the piano. Later on, I hear, of course, he was playing the pick. Great technique. Great sound. Great feel. But it’s not Bireli Lagrene, it’s not George Benson either—I don’t know. 4 stars. [AFTER] Actually, I did think about Lage for a second, but then I said no.

  1. Bela Fleck-Djelmady Tounkara, “Mariam,” (from THROW DOWN YOUR HEART: TALES FROM THE ACOUSTIC PLANET, VOL. 3, AFRICA SESSIONS, Rounder, 2009) (Fleck, banjo; Tounkara, guitar; Alou Coulibazy, calabash)

That sounds African for sure. I can’t even tell…that’s from… Are most of the musicians from Mali? I hear the calabash sound. The guitar player, I don’t know if he’s African. Could it be Leni Stern? Not Leni? I don’t know. It’s a beautiful piece. That’s definitely Mali for me. That style of guitar playing…almost everyone plays like that in Mali for me. The other string instrument reminds me of…if I’m thinking of an African instrument, I think of n’goni. But even though it reminds of n’goni, it sounds more like a banjo. 3 stars.

  1. Bireli Lagrene, “Sur La Croisette” (from SOLO: TO BI OR NOT TO BI, Dreyfuss, 2006) (Lagrene, acoustic guitar, composer)

Whoa! Whoo! Man. Again, somebody with a big influence of Django Reinhardt. At the beginning, I was thinking of one of the Latinos, that guy from Venezuela, but the chops… I’m probably wrong, but the person I know who plays with that energy and freedom is Bireli Lagrene. Bireli is one of the cats who has not only the great technique, but the ideas. It definitely reminds me of him. The flowing of the ideas. There’s always something coming. Especially for what I just heard, what I like is the spontaneity. I don’t hear the phrase coming, if it’s going to be short or long. And I like the sound from the fingers on the strings. It’s very, very intense. 5 stars. [AFTER] Whoo! Bireli… Everything I said makes sense, especially the Django influence. People don’t know too much about Bireli, especially when he goes out of the Django playing. The Django influence obviously is there, but this is one of the guitar players that can carry so much different territory, and just go, like I said, from one place to the other. I don’t hear any… There’s no barrier. He can just go from scratch to anywhere he wants, without having something holding up technically or harmonically. He’s a real genius.

  1. Nguyen Lê-Paolo Fresu, “Stranieri” (from HOMESCAPE, ACT, 2006) (Lê, electric guitar; Fresu, trumpet)

That’s a hard one for me. It sounds like a band from Europe—the trumpet, the effects on it and the groove reminds me a little bit of Erik Truffaz. The guitar playing at the beginning…I can hear a little bit of some Indian sound, or, so I was thinking about John McLaughlin. But then I said, “no, it can’t be John.” It sounded like three musicians. I like it. I like the groove and I like the ambiance. The guitarist reminds me of a cat in Paris named Louis Winsberg, but I don’t think it’s him. 3 stars. [AFTER] Yeah, it had something European. The effects on the trumpet and the groove. I don’t hear that a lot here in the United States. You may hear some groove, but then when you hear the trumpet, maybe they put some effects, but not that much. The guitar, I thought this guy is Indian or some… That’s what brought me to Louis Winsberg, who is in Paris. Nguyen Lê is in Paris, too. They have a similar sound, but not the phrasing.

  1. Pat Martino, “Full House” (from REMEMBER, Blue Note, 2006) (Martino, electric guitar; David Kikoski, piano; John Patitucci, bass; Scott Allan Robinson, drums; Daniel Sadownick, percussion; Wes Montgomery, composer)

I’m 90% sure that that’s Pat Martino, just by the phrasing, the articulation, and the sound. At the beginning, anyway, that was a Wes Montgomery song, “Full House.” I was thinking, man, this could be one…from the groove, it sounded like it was going to a funk kind of thing. So I started thinking about people like Ronny Jordan, but then I realized it’s not going there. It’s not the same technique either. So yeah, it’s Pat Martino. 5 stars. Pat Martino is one of the greatest guitar players I have ever heard in my life. Most of us learned from him at some point. I remember transcribing his solos. When most people think about Pat Martino, they think about a lot of notes. But when I hear him, I don’t hear just notes. I think he has a unique approach to combine the notes and the technique—the technique is always amazing.

************

Lionel Loueke (DB Article):

“I wish I could find time to go away for six months and work,” says Lionel Loueke. “Things weren’t clear before, but now I know exactly what I want to work on. I just need the time.”

Time was in short supply for Loueke in 2005. The Benin–born, Brooklyn-based guitarist, 32, toured with Terence Blanchard and Herbie Hancock, opened for Brad Mehldau and Roy Haynes in Europe with solo recitals, and sidemanned at workshop-oriented New York venues like the Jazz Gallery, 55 Bar, and Fat Cat with emerging artists like Gretchen Parlato, Yosvany Terry, Jeff Ballard, Jason Lindner, Robert Glasper, and Avishai (trumpeter) Cohen, and established stars like Jeff Watts and Richard Bona. He also worked increasingly with a collective trio, which recorded the eponymous Gilfema (Obliqsound).

This disk and the more abstract solo recording In A Trance might cause an outsider to wonder exactly what Loueke finds lacking, for each document reveals his singular ability to transform his nylon-string, hollow-bodied, electrified acoustic guitar into a sort of virtual, real-time Afro-Western orchestra. He writes songs in Fon and Mina dialects, sings them with a resonant tenor voice, and improvises on the melodies, scales and rhythms with cat-like, off-the-grid phrasing and up-to-the-second harmonic progressions. He articulates his lines with self-invented fingering techniques, preparing the strings to elicit the timbres of such indigenous homeland instruments as the kalimba, kora, and djembe, and conjures phantasmagoric orchestrations with real-time looping, executing it all with enough virtuoso authority to bliss out the most demanding guitar-head. King Sunny Ade meets Pat Metheny meets Derek Bailey might be the Hollywood pitch.

The son of a mathematics professor and a schoolteacher, Loueke learned traditional rhythmic patterns orally in the village of his grandfather, a singer. As a teenager in Cotonou, Benin’s port and largest city, he emulated his guitarist older brother. “We were repeating phrases by people like Sunny Ade and Fela,” he recalls. “But at the same time I was thinking about how to get the sound of the kora or kalimba, which are not chromatic, on the guitar. I got involved in Occidental music playing Rock and Blues. At first, I thought everything was just part of the song, because in Africa you sing, then you play, and then you have the verse. When I discovered they were improvising, I became curious. The first time I heard B.B. King, the way he bent the notes reminded me of a three-string instrument in the north of Benin. I could hear where it came from.”

Eager to expand his horizons, Loueke matriculated at the National Institute of Arts in Ivory Coast, where he studied classical guitar and ethnomusicology. “I wanted to write music and I wanted to study jazz,” he says of his systematic path. “I didn’t want to go from Ivory Coast to the States because I had the language barrier.” There followed four years of jazz studies in Paris, another three at Berklee, and two years at the Thelonious Monk Institute. In 2003, after 13 years of formal education, Loueke felt sufficiently prepared to enter the fray.

“All those young, well-known guys have their own way to play and don’t sound like anybody else,” Loueke says of his New York cohort. “That’s probably what Herbie and Terence and Wayne like about my playing. It doesn’t sound like Wes Montgomery or Pat Metheny or John Scofield. You may like it or not, but it’s different. They’re looking for people who are not afraid to try different things and be themselves.”

Though he continues to find stimulation in New York’s multicultural, group-hopping scene, Loueke intends to focus on Gilfema, comprised of Swedish-Italian bassist Massimo Biolcata and Hungarian drummer Ferenc Nemeth, his classmates at Berklee and the Monk Institute. “I’m at a point where I can call any well-known musician for a gig,” he says. “But there aren’t that many band sounds in New York, and I’m hoping to play more with the same guys. I believe you create a concept by playing with people every day, and not always different musicians.”

To make it happen, he’s prepared to take his time. “I’m pulling together my harmony and the rhythms I want to develop,” Loueke says. “I’m doing it naturally, but it’s slow. If I can have a break, I’ll work on organizing the concept.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Blindfold Test, Chick Corea, Lionel Loueke

For trumpet titan Randy Brecker’s birthday, an uncut Downbeat Blindfold Test from 2008

As he approaches his 80th birthday, Randy Brecker remains the “gold standard” of trumpet. That was made evident to me last year at the Amazonas Jazz Festival in Manaus, Brazil, when Brecker, who had spent almost a full day in transit from Europe, where he was touring, took the stage with the excellent local big band that was playing his charts, and nailed every solo with freshness and vigor, taking chances and unfailingly going for broke. Then he flew back to Europe for more concerts I think devoted to the music of Fats Navarro. One of a kind.

I’m sharing the uncut proceedings our Downbeat Blindfold Test in 2008. Even though he didn’t nail the identities of all the players, his focus was keen throughout and his analyses were thorough. I learned so much from this session. Thank you, maestro.

********

  1. Marcus Printup, “Hot House” (from PEACE IN THE ABSTRACT, Steeplechase, 2006) (Printup, trumpet; Greg Tardy, tenor saxophone; Kengo Nakamura, bass; Shinnosuke Takahashi, drums; Tadd Dameron, composer)

Obviously, “Hot House,” which is no easy task to perform. No piano. Sounds like a contemporary take on it, which is interesting. Maybe something Russell Gunn might do. It’s a good solo, good feel. Russell would probably be my first guess. My second guess would be Roy, but it’s not quite Roy’s sound. Not Russell? Well, I like pianoless quartets. There’s a lot of open space in this, and they have a very nice feel. If it’s not Russell, it’s somebody who has what I call a really good jazz trumpet sound, and he’s listened to the tradition of the instrument. The tenor player sounds like somebody I know, but I can’t quite place it. Let’s see if I get it on the fours. No, you got me. The tenor had a little Lovano in there, but it’s not him, and I can’t quite place the trumpet player. But both were excellent soloists, both could utilize the full range of their instruments and play great within the bebop tradition with a hint of modernity with the arrangement, which is completely contemporary. For execution and musicality, 4 stars. There wasn’t anything I suppose amazingly original, but it was really well-done and swinging. I have no idea who the bass player or drummer was. It could have been Tain maybe.

  1. Enrico Rava, “Felipe” (from THE THIRD MAN, ECM, 2007) (Rava, trumpet; Stefano Bollani, piano; Moacir Santos, composer)

Nice trumpet sound. Maybe a little too much reverb on the trumpet, on the recording. It might be one of those audiophile recordings with one microphone in the church. The pianist has a very nice, light touch, which I like. Also a nice in-and-out harmonic sense. The trumpet player has a really nice, open trumpet sound, probably some classical training. But I’m finding it hard to nail down who it is or what the tune is either. Boy, you got me on that one, but once again, it was a very nice performance, for me kind of a strange recording, probably a really large, open room, or maybe they added a little too much reverb, but it was a really good performance and, whatever the tune is, very well-written—maybe it’s an original. Moacir Santos? Ah. I’d say 4 stars. I enjoyed both the solos, and the trumpet player’s tone. He constantly came up with ideas. Enrico? That’s interesting. I played with Enrico in the ‘60s, but I still know him more as a less harmonic, free player. We were both at the time heavily influenced by Don Cherry, and that’s how I remember him. I know his playing has changed a lot in the ensuing years, and he practices more. I remember hearing an interview where he… You can tell that he spends a lot of time on the instrument. His tone is completely different than it used to be. A very, very nice tone. ECM? For me, there’s still a little too much reverb on that one.

  1. Tom Harrell, “Va” (from LIGHT ON, High Note, 2007) (Harrell, trumpet, composer; Wayne Escoffery, tenor saxophone; Danny Grissett, piano; Ugonna Okegwo, bass; Jonathan Blake, drums)

Sounds like an original composition with difficult changes. The trumpet player is doing a good job of negotiating the changes, so maybe it’s his tune. Man, this tune just keeps going and going! I’m waiting for the changes to stop for a second. But they’re doing a good job with it. Conversely, recording-wise, for my taste, this is a little too dry-sounding. The trumpet player has a nice, light touch, really relaxed. I have no idea who it is yet. I’d probably like to hear this tune open up somewhere in the tune. It’s a lot of chords. All in all, I like the tune, the melody, but again, I feel harmonically there should have been some kind of open section, especially with the three solos. The solos were all good. The trumpet player was kind of influenced by Miles. It was a little too locked in for me to kind of tell who anybody was. 3½ stars. Tom Harrell? So that’s Wayne Escoffery. That’s pretty good. Once again, it didn’t sound like my conception of Tom. That was Tom’s tune, obviously. Good tune, but I wouldn’t want to play on it.

  1. Avishai Cohen, “Gigi et Amelie” (from Third World Love, NEW BLUES, Anzic, 2007) (Cohen, trumpet, composer; Yonathan Avishai, piano; Omer Avital, bass; Daniel Freedman, drums)

Nice tune. I wonder who this is. Maybe composed by somebody in the band. Doesn’t sound like American guys. Maybe South American. Charming comes to mind, the way they’re playing the tune. This is a charming rendition, heartfelt. Once again, it’s a nice, open trumpet sound. It’s hard to hear the sound with the Harmon mute before. I don’t think it’s him, but it has somewhat of a Kenny Wheeler vibe, though I don’t think it’s him. Another Italian guy? For some reason, I don’t even know why I say this, but I was thinking Argentina. Anyway, it was a really pretty tune and they played it well. 4 stars. Avishai? I was a little off geographically. I just heard Avishai at the Blue Note a couple of nights ago and he sounded really good. But it’s hard to make the connection. So far, everyone’s sound is very nice, but it’s hard to pick out individuals in general—but that’s a sign of the times. Now, I just heard the same group a couple of nights ago at the late night set at the Blue Note, and they sounded very good, so maybe I should have recognized it. Plus, they have the same name, so if they married each other it would be good.

  1. Graham Haynes, “Oshogbo” (from Adam Rudolph, DREAM GARDEN, Justin Time, 2008) (Rudolph, percussion; Haynes, cornet; Ned Rothenberg, alto saxophone; Hamid Drake, drumset, percussion; Kenny Wessel, electric guitar; Steve Gorn, bansuri bamboo flute; Shantir Blumenkrantz, acoustic bass; Adam Rudolph, hand drumset)

Interesting voicings, first of all. It’s an adventurous tune, adventurous voicings and conception. It’s very modern in conception in comparison to the other things I’ve heard. A trumpet player I’ve played with, whose name is Amir El-Saffar, has a group that might be similar in conception. But I need to hear it. It didn’t quite sound like him; he has a little more traditional trumpet technique. But I have no idea who it is. Conceptually it’s very interesting, taking it out on a limb. It was for the most part in 7, but it was broken up quite originally. Now it’s going to another place. It might be some guys who aren’t American again—not that it matters. Interesting writing. I liked it. 4 stars for the originality. It didn’t ever quite get to the next level for me, but it was quite interesting. It was nice to hear something different.

  1. Jim Rotondi, “Mamacita” (from THE PLEASURE DOME, SharpNine, 2004) (Rotondi, trumpet; David Hazeltine, piano; Ray Drummond, bass; Joe Farnsworth, drums)

I think that’s a flugelhorn. Somebody influenced by Freddie. Is this a Kenny Dorham tune? Oh, it’s a Joe Henderson-Kenny Dorham record, but I can’t think of the name. Ah, yes, “Mamacita.” They’re getting a good groove. My wild guess would be Jeremy Pelt playing flugelhorn. Not Jeremy? Somebody like that. A lot of chops, a lot of good ideas. That’s a nice reharmonization of the tune. Like I said earlier, they had a nice groove; the drummer has a nice sound, kind of Tony-ish. Well, somebody in there… It’s not Eddie Henderson. But somebody who listens to a lot of the same people I do. 4 stars. [AFTER] Those guys are all really consistent players, and they know how to lay it down. It threw me for a loop because I’m used to hearing Rotondi play trumpet with more of a Freddie sound. Strangely enough, for a second, on one phrase, I thought of Arturo Sandoval. I knew it wasn’t him. But Jim is an excellent and really consistent player. I always enjoy listening to him.

  1. Bill Dixon-Tony Oxley, “Sine Qua Non” (from PAPYRUS, VOL.1, Soul Note, 1999) (Bill Dixon, trumpet, composer; Tony Oxley, drums & percussion)

I’m not sure who this is. It’s an interesting piece. Trumpet and drums. It doesn’t quite sound like they’re listening to each other. The drummer has a lot of chops, but just kind of streamrolling over what the trumpet player’s doing. For me, this might make a nice intro, but for a whole piece it’s wearing a little thin. Wild guess. Bill Dixon. He’s another guy I came upon and played with a couple of times when I first came to New York. As I said, this might make a nice introduction, but it’s leaving me kind of cold. Ah, that’s a Bill Dixon there right there. It’s getting more intense. We’ll see how intense it gets. Slow build. The drummer’s arms must be getting tired by now? Who is it? Tony Oxley? Dixon also pioneered in the electronic sounds that he’s doing now. Now it sounds like they’re listening to each other. But maybe that was the point, that they not listen to each other. I might give it 2½ by the end. It just took too long to get into something for me, but that’s just my opinion. If I was playing, it might be a different story. It’s a whole other perspective when you’re actually playing like that. You actually lose time.

  1. Mike Rodriguez, “Guayaquil” (The Rodriguez Brothers, CONVERSATIONS, Savant, 2007) (Mike Rodriguez, trumpet; Robert Rodriguez, piano; Ricardo Rodriguez, bass; Antonio Sanchez, drums)

Nice tune. It’s nice how they’re using the piano almost as a second horn, and the right hand of the piano blended nicely with the trumpet melody. Nice harmony. The trumpet player is doing a really good job of negotiating the changes. Hard tune. Nice warm trumpet sound. It’s obviously contemporary guys. I like the chord progression. I like the tune. The performance is very good. I’ll just throw out George Cables for piano? I don’t know. I’m not sure who the trumpet player is yet. It’s coming out of that period we all grew up in. Got me again. I could hazard a few wild guesses. It sounds like somebody I should know, too. Something in the vibrato and the tone struck me, but I can’t place it, and I can’t tell if it’s a younger guy or maybe a slightly older guy, but I think it might be a slightly older guy. Something about the conception makes me think that—at least the piano player. But I can’t place it. I liked it. It didn’t really jump out at me. But 3½ stars. It was really well-done. Everybody had a lot of chops and performed it really well. If I had to make a wild guess, Nicholas Payton, a younger guy. But somebody of that ilk. [AFTER] I’ve heard a lot about Mike Rodriguez. I haven’t heard him yet. Antonio is a wonderful drummer and he was right in the pocket on that one. You’re getting me on all these guys, but everything I’ve heard I’ve enjoyed so far. It’s amazing, the amount of musicianship that goes into all these records. Trumpet is not an easy instrument, and everybody sounds great.

  1. Corey Wilkes, “Quintet Nine” (from Roscoe Mitchell, TURN, RogueArt, 2005) (Wilkes, trumpet; Mitchell, flute, percussion; Craig Taborn, piano; Jaribu Shahid, bass, percussion; Tani Tabbal, drums)

I’m trying to figure out what instrument that is—a high slide whistle or a piccolo. This is the second tune in 7, so that’s a real popular time signature these days. It’s an interesting, moody, kind of evocative arrangement, an evocative piece. Maybe somebody like Jack Walrath, but it’s probably not him. They were all coasting along together. It meandered a bit, I think. I like things happening quicker. This section is nice. I still can’t figure out if that’s a piccolo or a high slide whistle. It’s an interesting tune, though. There’s a little Eric Dolphy influence in general, but Jack Walrath is the only one who came to mind—it’s not him, I can tell. The composition is interesting. 3 stars. I’m not familiar with Corey Wilkes’ work, but it’s an interesting piece.

  1. Dave Ballou, “Tenderly” (from REGARDS, Steeplechase, 2004) (Ballou, trumpet; Frank Kimbrough, piano; John Hebert, bass; Randy Peterson, drums)

A nice, pure, unfettered trumpet sound. I like that. No vibrato. Nailing it. Except it’s probably a flugelhorn. Nice, floaty time, too, with regards to the rhythm section; nice and open, a lot of room for interpretation. This is interesting in the way they’re playing time but not playing time. An interesting conception. I like this in the respect that they’re all really listening to each other, and both harmonically and rhythmically it’s floating along. Really interesting. Kind of a Paul Bley influence on the piano, just the overall picture. There’s a record of Paul’s I used to love called Closer. It’s still interesting, because it doesn’t sound like they want to play the time. I hope there’s not supposed to be time during this section, but it’s still interesting. It’s really open. This is the way Paul Bley used to play with his trio when they first came to New York with Barry Altschul and Mark Levinson on bass—this kind of implied time. A really nice reinterpretation of the melody by the flugelhorn player. Really sensitive all around. Everybody really listened to each other. But I don’t have any idea who anyone is. He ended on a high-E, I think, on flugel—that’s no easy trick. Somebody I probably know, but probably not. 4 stars. It was a really original reading of the tune, and I’m impressed when people are that sensitive and really come up with something new on a standard that’s been played a million times. [AFTER] I played with Dave Ballou years ago on a Kenny Werner project, and I’ve always been impressed with his playing.

  1. Nicholas Payton, “Fela II” (from SONIC TRANCE, Warner, 2003) (Payton, trumpet; Kevin Hays, keyboards; Vicente Archer, bass; Adonis Rose, drums; Daniel Sadownick, percussion)

This has a nice, polyrhythmic quality to it, just from the getgo. Once again, a nice warm trumpet sound. Some of these guys I’m not familiar with, and it’s somewhat hard to differentiate one from the other, but everyone’s technique has been admirable today. The trumpet player has really good range and facility, good ideas. Generally, this piece reminds of Miles’ band, the Bitches Brew days, especially the sounds coming out of the keyboard. It’s a little more metrically modulated than were tunes in those days. But everyone’s listening and responding to each other really well. Really good facility on the trumpet. Clark exercises. But once again, I couldn’t even hazard a guess as to who it was. I don’t know if it’s someone I know, but he had a lot of facility on the instrument. Good sound. Interesting piece. 3½ stars. [AFTER] Oh, that’s from Sonic Trance. I should have guessed it. Nick is one of my favorite players. He has so much facility on the instrument. This was a radical shift from what he was doing before. I remember when he did it. I actually heard this live. Was Kevin Hays playing? Yes, he was there. I heard him in New Orleans at Snug Harbor. So I should have guessed.

  1. Ryan Kisor, “Deception” (from THE DREAM, Criss-Cross, 2001) (Kisor, trumpet; Peter Zak, piano; John Webber, bass; Willie Jones, III, drums)

Whoever it is has amazing technique. That’s a hard head. The changes to “Cherokee.” Amazing facility. Wow, that was very, very good. I’ll hazard a guess. Ryan Kisor maybe? Whoa! He’s too good. That was exceptional facility. I’ve also heard Wynton play this tune, like, 50 choruses, which is very impressive, so I figured if it wasn’t Wynton it might very well be Ryan. He’s an exceptional player in all realms—great lead player, great soloist, knows all the styles. He’s one of my favorites. I’ve played with him a lot in Mingus Big Band. Wow, that was great. 4½ stars. Well, 5 stars just on Ryan’s virtuosity, but maybe take a half-star away because I’ve heard the tune a million times, but never quite like that. He’s an incredible all-around player.

All these records were very good. It’s a reality these days that it is harder to tell guys apart trumpetistically, because we all study out of the same books, and there’s a certain trumpetistic artistry that’s prevalent these days. So it’s harder to pick people apart, but that’s overshadowed by the musicianship on all these records, which was really excellent. That’s always my answer to the problem these days, when guys say, “Ah, too many guys sound alike.” I say the musicianship is so high it doesn’t matter.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blindfold Test, DownBeat, Randy Brecker, trumpet, Uncategorized

For alto saxophonist Wes “Warmdaddy” Anderson’s birthday, a Downbeat article from 2011, a WKCR conversation with Wes and Wycliffe Gordon from 1996, and an interview with Wes about Alvin Batiste in 2007

“Tales of Warmdaddy” – Downbeat, 2011

In late March, Wessell “Warmdaddy” Anderson arose at dawn in his home in East Lansing, Mich., and caught an early flight to New York. After checking in at his Upper West Side hotel, he caught a cab down Broadway to the Time Warner Center, where Wynton Marsalis was leading a run-through of his septet repertoire in Jazz at Lincoln Center’s rehearsal space for a three-night stint at the Rose Theater.

Things proceeded efficiently, and the members dispersed at 2 p.m. “We know this music,” Anderson said. In contrast to his casually dressed colleagues, he wore a tailored brown jacket, a lavender dress shirt, tan slacks and two-tone loafers with running-shoe soles. “We worked three weeks every month for four or five years straight,” he noted. “People grew up and left the band, but whenever we come back together, it’s the same.”

At this moment, Anderson—who is about 6 feet 4 inches tall and looks more like a left tackle than the world-class alto and sopranino saxophonist that he is—was hungry. He donned his black porkpie and knee-length black overcoat, picked up his sax case and headed downtown to Manganaro’s, an old-school emporium on Ninth Avenue that serves Italian provisions and sandwiches in the front and home cooking in the back. During a lunch that included a bocconcini, a tomato salad and linguine with clams, “Warmdaddy” reflected on his life and career.

“It’s been a good month,” he said. “I’ve had a chance to come out and let people hear me after my stroke.” Without prompting, Anderson offered the details of the catastrophe that befell him in July 2007, a couple of years after he had ended a 17-year run with Marsalis to assume a faculty position at Michigan State University. “My left side was weak—my hand, my foot, my lip, which was the last thing that healed. During rehab, I’d come in early every day to get in the pool. They said, ‘Why are you here early?’ I said, ‘I want to play.’ They said, ‘You’ll play some day.’ I said, ‘No. I’m going to play tomorrow. You don’t understand me. Even if I’m in a wheelchair, as long as my lip and fingers can move, I’m OK.’ That December, Wynton asked me to do a Christmas show. I said, ‘If it don’t look right, don’t have me do the show.’ He said, ‘No, you’re all right.’”

Anderson turned his attention to the Manganaro’s proprietress, who had just presented a complimentary cannoli. “He cheated on me by getting married,” she bantered. “Don’t be mad,” he beamed, flashing a brilliant smile worthy of his memorable cognomen.

“I lost the get-up-and-go to want to stay at school,” he continued. “My son was in 10th grade when I left Lincoln Center. I was working a lot, making great money, but my wife asked me to come home. I said, ‘I’ll give you whatever he needs.’ She said, ‘He needs you.’ I liked being inside a jazz environment and being able to come home every night. But after the stroke, my son had graduated and decided he wanted to be a musician. I realized that he wasn’t seeing a professional musician anymore, but just a teacher. I decided that if I made it back to school, I’d try to work more. Then work started coming, and it reached a point where I always had to check with someone to do it. I felt like I was in a box. The pay is good. The benefits are great. But I’m not satisfied.”

So when the semester concluded, Anderson relocated to Baton Rouge, La., the city where, as a young man in 1982, he had attended Southern University to study with clarinetist Alvin Batiste. Already working a fair number of weekends and one-offs in the Midwest and the South, he hit the road full-stride, ballyhooing the gigs with the 2011 album Warmdaddy Plays Cannonball, his fifth as a leader. On the CD, a sextet of four young, New Orleans-based musicians—among them his son on trombone—and veteran bassist Harry Anderson (Southern University’s current director of jazz studies) interpret six Cannonball Adderley staples in a modern Crescent City manner.

Born and raised in Brooklyn, the son of a working drummer, “Warmdaddy” started soaking up Charlie Parker at 14, and was sufficiently conversant with modernist vocabulary to play Thelonious Monk’s “Played Twice” for his audition tape.

“I was raised with older musicians,” he explained. “I carried my dad’s drum case to gigs. He took me with him when he went to Philly Joe Jones’ loft on the Lower East Side for a lesson. At the time, Philly was making his stick book, and he and my dad practiced on his bar. Then he took me to see Elvin Jones. Elvin would squeeze the heck out of me. When he saw me later, he said, ‘Oh, I see you’re big now. Don’t think I can’t pick your big ass up!’—and he picked me up. These people were like family.”

Anderson transcribed numerous Bird solos by ear, internalizing Parker’s attack, the way he breathed, his alternate fingerings. Anderson took private lessons with Eddie Daniels and Walter Bishop Jr., attended Jazzmobile workshops led by Charles Davis and Frank Foster, and had university of the streets experiences sitting in with pianist Gil Coggins and Sonny Stitt in outer-borough clubs. He also attended sessions at the Gramercy Star Café, then a serious hang for New York’s bebop-oriented musicians. “My dad said, ‘Watch yourself in there; they’re drinking and smoking—it’s bad stuff you want to stay away from,’” Anderson related. “But people knew my father, and they didn’t bother me.”

The summer before his senior year, Anderson joined a friend at Grant’s Tomb to hear a Jazzmobile concert by Art Blakey and a new edition of the Jazz Messengers featuring Wynton and Branford Marsalis (then playing alto saxophone). Later, they went to the venue Lickity Split for a jam session. “I loved what Branford was doing,” Anderson recalled. “He sounded like a latter-day Cannonball. At the club, I was playing with my eyes closed, and my friend told me to open them. Branford was standing there, looking right at me. I got nervous. He said, ‘No, keep playing; I like it.’

“Later Branford asked where I was going to school. I told him I was thinking about Berklee—I had a full scholarship. He told me I needed to go study with Alvin Batiste. I’d never heard of him. He said, ‘That’s the cat who taught me.’ I said, ‘Whoever taught you, I want him to teach me.’ He told me he was getting ready to leave Art Blakey and asked, ‘Are you ready?’ I told him no. He said, ‘Donald Harrison’s about to start—check him out, too.’ ‘Who’s Donald?’ ‘That’s my man from New Orleans.’ I put two and two together. I wanted to go where I thought the young musicians were, and New Orleans seemed like the right direction. If I went to school where they did, maybe I could do this.”

Batiste’s practicum included switching Anderson to a double-lip embouchure and eliminating any possible tendencies of being “too hip for the room,” as the saying goes. “When I got there, Alvin said, ‘I see you’ve been saturated with bebop. We have to go back in the history.’ I said, ‘This is history.’ He said, ‘Oh, no. You’re already playing modern. I know what I’m going to do with you.’ He sent me on the Greyhound to New Orleans to a gig with Doc Paulin’s Marching Band for Mardi Gras. He said, ‘Wear black pants and a white shirt, have your ax and be ready to march.’ Next thing I know, we’re marching around a hotel, going from one conference room to another, playing ‘Little Liza Jane’ and ‘Down By The Riverside.’ I didn’t know how to play inside a second-line band, but after six hours of marching, I figured it out. When I got back, Bat said, ‘Did you understand the polyphony?’ I said, ‘Yeah, everybody was playing something different.’ He said, ‘That’s three-part harmony.’ Then he started playing some music with Sidney Bechet, and then Louis Armstrong.

“He said, ‘You’ve got to figure out how to make everything modern. Just because it’s old doesn’t mean it’s old. Check out those solos; people still can’t play them.’ He was right, because Sidney Bechet’s solos are harder than Bird’s. He listened to more operatic singers, and he played like a direct extension of those singers.”

Within a few years, Anderson had transitioned to a more ensemble-oriented, multidirectional conception of musical production that, he would soon discover, paralleled the direction Wynton Marsalis was beginning to move towards in 1986, when he came to Baton Rouge to do a workshop.

“Whenever someone was soloing, I came up with different licks for the saxophone section,” Anderson said. “Wynton looked perplexed, like, ‘These country musicians don’t know how to play a solo, but they come up with very good licks in between—how is this going on?’ Everybody pointed to me.”

Soon thereafter, Marsalis brought Anderson to Cleveland for a tryout week with Marcus Roberts, Bob Hurst and Jeff “Tain” Watts. “He was still doing ‘Black Codes’ and ‘Knozz-Moe-King,’ playing the same way Woody Shaw had been doing, but different forms played by younger people,” Anderson said. “It was exciting, and I loved it. Wynton told me, ‘You sound good, but you’re not ready yet. Go in the shed, and we’ll get back together.’ So I thought, ‘Yeah, that’s probably the last time I’ll see you.’ Two years later, he called me back. I said, ‘You’re never going to use an alto.’ He said, ‘It’s a different instrument, but I like the way you play.’

“It was a big challenge, but Wynton makes the challenge work for you. He said, ‘You need to listen to stuff you don’t know.’ I’d checked out Benny Carter, but I didn’t know Johnny Hodges. I had to play a lot of Johnny Hodges’ music, and I had to figure out what I was going to do with it. And I had to learn how to lead the section.”

Toward this end, Marsalis suggested that Anderson observe Norris Turney, who had filled Johnny Hodges’ chair, if not his shoes, with Duke Ellington after Hodges died in 1970, and was fulfilling the lead alto function in the first iteration of the Jazz at Lincoln Center Orchestra (JLCO). “Norris told me that the feeling of the music has to go through you. He said, ‘It’s all right to read what’s written, but make them move with the feeling.’ He’d play turned to the band, with his back to the audience. He said, ‘That’s love, baby. You play for the band first, then you play for the audience.’ By being around a musician like that, I understood. When he left, Wynton said, ‘You’d better move over.’ I said, ‘I don’t know if I’m ready.’ He said, ‘You’d better be.’”

Shortly after joining Marsalis, Anderson played his first Lincoln Center concert, a Charlie Parker tribute with elder Birdologist Charles McPherson. “I knew about him, but I didn’t know until I got on the stage how bad he’d cut me up,” Anderson remarked. “Wynton said, ‘Well, you learned.’”

Some years later, Anderson and McPherson matched wits on repertoire by Monk. “The same thing happened,” Anderson said. “I wasn’t really ready.”

Two weeks before our lunch conversation, Anderson had experienced his third “dueling altos” encounter with McPherson, which was also his first solo appearance at the Rose Theater since the stroke. More than 20 years had passed since their first duel, and Anderson demonstrated just how ready he now was. The repartee began about 45 minutes into the first set, devoted primarily to less-traveled Parker tunes. Propelled by a first-class bebop rhythm section of Ehud Asherie on piano, Ben Wolfe on bass and Victor Lewis on drums, Anderson pranced through “Cardboard” with high poise, creating fresh, thematic lines that he phrased on the beat in a way owing much to his assimilation of the Benny Carter-Cannonball Adderley playbook, in contrast to McPherson’s swooping, barline-crossing, Bird-like arpeggiations. On “Another Hair-Do,” McPherson ratcheted into a supersonic opening solo, soaring through the changes, cramming note clusters, quoting Parker licks in unexpected places. When it came his turn, Anderson waited a few measures, quoted “Red Top” and, with due deliberation, built a long, ascendant solo in which melody was paramount—as Sonny Stitt used to do in his prime—before engaging in a stimulating series of exchanges.

The altoists assumed similar characters on the second set, which paid homage to Parker’s Bird With Strings oeuvre. The program included once-commissioned, never-recorded charts by John Lewis and Gerry Mulligan, lyric Anderson features on “Repetition,” “Laura” and “Rocker” and an intense dialogue on “What Is This Thing Called Love.”

Thinking back on that performance, Anderson joked, “I said, ‘As long as I’m bleeding, I’m going to have some of your blood on me, too.’ Charles is going to play like Charlie Parker, so it doesn’t make sense for me to do it.” Again, Anderson referenced his attitude toward interpreting Johnny Hodges features with JLCO. “The first thing I decided was not to play like him. But playing his tunes actually explained to me how to make a ballad sound beautiful, but my way.”

This is precisely the dictum to which Anderson hews on his new recording, which gestated in a series of “Wess Anderson Presents” appearances at Snug Harbor in New Orleans devoted to repertoire by John Coltrane, Monk and, most recently, Adderley. “Most of my records have been original music, and I thought people might like something different,” he said, en route from Manganaro’s to a nearby cigar store to stock up on hand-rolleds for his New York week. “People say, ‘I remember hearing you with Wynton years ago.’ I say, ‘Thank you very much. Check out what we’re doing now.’”

****************

Wycliffe Gordon-Wes Anderson (1-12-96) – WKCR:

TP:    You’ve been playing alongside each other since ’89 with Wynton Marsalis.  The Septet has more or less disbanded except for various appearances, and the members are going their own ways, doing their own projects.  Wycliffe will be soon be recording a two-trombone release for Atlantic with Ronald Westray, Wes has one release out on Atlantic and another just coming out, Eric Reed, and so forth… Is your partnership an ongoing situation as a quintet, Wes?

ANDERSON:  First thing, it’s always a pleasure to play with Wycliffe because he makes me laugh.  You can’t get enough of that good trombone that he’s playing.  We have a certain gel together when we’re playing, since we played together so long in the septet.  We were on the outer fringes of the Septet horn-line because it was four horns in front, and I would be on the extreme left, then it would be the tenor saxophonists and Wynton and Wycliffe.   We went in a semi-circle, so we always had eye contact — we were kind of the bookends.  So we’d be the last ones to file up to the microphone…

TP:    And would he try to make you laugh?

ANDERSON:  Always.  He would do something, I’d look over there, and if I looked at him I would almost always mess up a part.  So I would not look at him.  I’d be smiling out the corner of my mouth and trying to play the saxophone at the same time.

TP:    Apart from Wycliffe’s sense of humor, what qualities in his playing do you admire?

ANDERSON:  It’s the real true feeling of just old-fashioned soul.  When I first heard him play the trombone, he was playing it the way you would really envision the trombone being played.  The trombone has a slide on it, versus a saxophone that has keys on it, or a trumpet that has valves.  So a trombone is an awkward instrument to play with a lot of velocity.  People have done it, people like J.J. Johnson and Curtis Fuller.  But to me, the true sound of a trombone is to hear that slide working, whether it be slow and very sultry or with short jerks… The humorous and emotional side, the humane side of the instrument.  It has a lot of possibilities, different ways of expressing itself.  It’s the difference between someone who’s a blues singer and someone who’s an operatic soprano.  It’s two different worlds.  But it still is a major part of the woodwind family, and in improvisation in jazz music.  The first time I heard Wycliffe play, it was like going back in time.  It sounded like he was playing like people like…

TP:    Trummy Young.

ANDERSON:  Exactly.  It was refreshing.  It was a sextet when Wycliffe came in, and it became a septet.  It gave us a whole new area of music that we can explore and we could actually move forward with that same sound.  We could take just the fundamental sound, say, for instance, that New Orleans lineup of trumpet, trombone and clarinet, and I’d be playing a saxophone part, then we could expand on that and take it later into this century, into jazz music, and then expound and go forward.  So we could use the fundamentals of just the ensemble playing, of all horns playing together and still be playing a tune like “Transition” and using that type of conception as far as improvisation.  Instead of one person taking a solo and another person taking a solo, all of us could play together, or in different combinations or different ways of doing it.  So it was something totally different for the band.  We had to get used to it, too, at first.  Wycliffe can expand more on that.

TP:    Pick up the chorus, Wycliffe.

GORDON:  Wes didn’t leave much to be said.  I don’t know really what to say after that.

TP:    Well, Wes and I have done several shows.  So perhaps we can shine the light on Wycliffe to talk about your story in music, and what led you to the point where someone like Wes Anderson could have the reaction to you that he stated, that this was how the trombone should be played.  How long have you been playing the trombone?  Since very young?

GORDON:  About 15 years now.

TP:    Back to high school?  Junior high school?

GORDON:  It was junior high school.  Actually elementary school.  My older brother Lucious played.  We’re a year apart, and growing up in my house, if he had something, I had to have it.  So he came home with a trombone one day, and I said, “Well…”  I knew it was kind of expensive, but in about three days I told my mother, “Mom, I want one of those.”  I didn’t know what it was; I just wanted one because he had one.  Eventually, I became interested in playing music, and I had an older relative who passed who had a collection of jazz records that I was outside in the garage listening to one day.  It was a history of jazz which started from early slave chants up to ragtime, to New Orleans music, Dixieland, up to what was considered Modern at that time — and when my great-aunt was living, the modern era was Dizzy Gillespie’s big band.  It was a five-record collection, and I listened to all the sides.  One thing really caught my attention, and that was the New Orleans music, Louis Armstrong playing the “Keyhole Blues.”  And at that age, I think it was the late ’70s or early ’80s, that’s when the popular Rock groups…the synthesizers…it became the hip thing to do, to have keyboards and all of these sounds and whatnot.  But I was outside listening to that, and something about it just grabbed my attention.  First of all, they were all acoustical instruments — trumpet, trombone, clarinet, tuba and piano.  So I tried to imitate that, and I was improvising.  I didn’t know that’s what I was doing, but I was just trying to play what they were playing.

We had a concert that next year, my eighth grade year, and it was the first year in Georgia that all the high schools… They got rid of the junior high schools…

TP:    This was in Augusta, right?

GORDON:  Augusta, Georgia, right.  I was born in Waynesboro, but this was Augusta.  So we had a concert in my eighth grade year, and I decided I was going to try this thing called improvisation.  We had a lot of high school students come to the junior high concert because they were getting two classes of musicians.  I tried to improvise, and back then, at the eighth grade level, all the solos are written out — you didn’t dare do a thing like that.  Unless you’re Wes Anderson or you’re from New York.  Anyway, it wasn’t known.  And the response I got from that really led me to want to play jazz music.  I enjoyed it.  It gave me a chance to express myself.  I didn’t really know much about it; I didn’t take private lessons; and I didn’t know really to buy records until after I got in college and met Wynton Marsalis.  I would just listen to that same record over and over and over, that one song.

TP:    Was there anybody you could play with in Augusta, coming up as a teenager?  How old are you, by the way?

GORDON:  28.

TP:    So that’s about 1980, you’re 12 years old.  In the first half of the ’80s, in Augusta, were there people you could play with?  Were there people who were aware of jazz?  Was that any part of your culture coming up?

GORDON:  No.  The only playing I did with people was football in the street, baseball, that type of thing.  But musically there wasn’t that type of interaction.  Not that I knew of.  I mean, at age 12 I didn’t hang out anyway.  I had to be in before the sun came down!  And my only experience was in stage bands in high school, junior high school…

TP:    So you learned the rudiments of trombone, and somewhat beyond that perhaps.

GORDON:  Like I said, I didn’t have private studies, so I kind of figured out my own way to play.  Then I went to college, Florida A&M, and…

TP:    They have a famous marching band at Florida A&M.  Were you part of it?

GORDON:  Yes.  For four years I marched in the band and had fun.

TP:    It got quite a bit of renown for the routines and so on…

GORDON:  They did okay.  Wes has a thing; he went to Southern University and…

ANDERSON:  They okay.  They all right.

GORDON:  They just stomped on us.  So I don’t really brag about the Florida A&M marching band.

ANDERSON:  A college rivalry.

GORDON:  A college rivalry thing.  But I had a pretty good experience.  In fact, that’s where I met Wynton Marsalis for the first time.  Wynton came during February of 1987.  Everyone said, “Wynton Marsalis is coming to the school, and Wynton Marsalis this and Wynton Marsalis…”  I said, “Good.”  “He’s won Grammies this, and…”  Good.  “I listen to Louis Armstrong.”  But after I met him… I didn’t watch much television, and the few records I did buy, I would buy all Louis Armstrong records to check out the music that I liked to  listen to.  But after meeting Wynton…

TP:    Did you emulate the trombone style of Kid Ory or Jack Teagarden from those records?  Is that part of your conception of playing trombone?

GORDON:  Pretty much.  A little of Kid Ory, a lot of Jack Teagarden, and Trummy Young, who I heard.  I like that style of trombone playing.  As Wes said, it is a hard instrument to speak.  Just the range of motion is so wide from first to seventh position, whereas on the saxophone you may have an inch or two; on the trumpet it’s the same on all three valves.  I’m not taking away from the fact that if you don’t practice, an instrument is going to be hard to play anyway.  But there’s a lot of physical characteristics we have to fight with in playing the trombone.

TP:    You have a very distinctive sound on the trombone.  Did that start to develop after college, or do you recollect it as being there already — your approach to embouchure and tone production?

GORDON:  Growing up I just liked playing trombone, and I think I always played the way I wanted to play.  But as I came in contact with people like Wynton, Wes, Todd Williams, Marcus Roberts, Eric Reed, the guys in the band… My first experience with them was out in Texas at the Caravan of Dreams.  That was the first gig I came to.  I was a big fish down at Florida A&M, but then when I heard them play…

TP:    You played with them or heard them for the first…

GORDON:  Wynton invited me out to do a gig.  When I met Wynton in ’87, we had a little thing in the band room… He came to give a lecture on jazz and its role in the society and in the community.  He came to our jazz band rehearsal, and it’s the first time in two years everyone came to rehearsal.  Which wasn’t good, because the band didn’t sound very good at all.  I won’t say how we sounded.  Anyway, Wynton heard me play… There were a couple of us who were really serious about playing jazz.  I figured I’d go to a school that had this great marching band, and the jazz program would be very good.  Anyway, I had fun while I was in the marching band.

Anyway, Wynton heard me play there, and I got his number and whatnot, and we stayed in touch.  Of course, he was hard to catch up with.  Marcus Roberts at the time lived in Tallahassee; I think he still lives there.  About a year passed.  I called Wynton and I could never get him.  When I did get him, I didn’t have my horn.  He said, “Learn some Charlie Parker solos and whatnot.”  Then I still couldn’t catch up with him.  I was playing at Pizza Hut; we could only play jazz during the Presidential receptions.  They wanted the jazz music when they wanted to kill the silence in the conversation when they really have anything to talk about.  That’s what they wanted us to play for.  So I was working at Pizza Hut, playing bass with a funk band.  I got a call from Marcus Roberts one night.  I thought it was one of my partners calling for me to bring him a pizza.

Anyway, to make a long story short, he said Wynton wanted me to come out to Texas.  I really hadn’t prepared.  I had almost at that point given up on playing or performing jazz just because of my experience down there in Tallahassee.  I went out to the Caravan of Dreams, and at the rehearsal that day — or the soundcheck — we really hadn’t played out a tune.  That’s when Wynton was working on the music for “The Majesty of The Blues.”  He was trying me out on some things, but I really wasn’t prepared.  I didn’t hear the band play until that night, and I was backstage.  Down in Tallahassee, we were playing in 4/4 and 3/4, and they were playing in 5/4, and then… The level of musicality overwhelmed me.  I wanted to leave and walk back to Tallahassee.  Just that bad.  I got him to have me play only two or three tunes a night at most.  But the information that I left with, that I got from all the guys, from Wynton and Marcus verbally and from all the other guys musically, I went back to Tallahassee with a new vibe.

Then Wynton called me seven or eight months later to come out to Blues Alley in D.C.  He was working on his Christmas record at that time.  At that point, I had been shedding a little, and then he asked me if I wanted to play on his record.  I said, “Yeah, of course.”  I did the record in February or March of that next year, and then during that summer… You know, I normally did construction work; that’s what I was doing.  He invited me to come out to go with the band…

TP:    What did you work on in that seven-eight month hiatus?

GORDON:  They within 30 minutes gave me about 3 or 4 pages, front and back, two columns on each side, of records to buy.  So every time I got paid, I went straight to the record store, and I started buying records and checking them out.  Everything from Monk to John Coltrane to Charlie Christian, to J.J. Johnson and Curtis Fuller.

TP:    So a crash course in the vocabulary that you’d have to be dealing with.

GORDON:  Pretty much.  They said, “Check this out, and learn this and deal with that.”  It was a lot to deal with.  But I checked the list, and I was always in the record store.  Every time I got money from a gig, every time I got money from playing in church, I’d go buy these records.  I just started shedding again.  It was like a new-found faith in the music, that somebody was interested in keeping the music alive and playing the music that I really wanted to play in, that I loved so much.

After doing that, we were out for the summer… This was when I first met Eric Reed.  It was just supposed to be a summer thing.  It was January 1989.  Myself and Wynton were out walking; we were in Arruba, out on the beach.  He said, “Let’s go mess with Eric Reed.”  We went to Eric’s room.  Eric was concerned about college… We were messing with him; I’m not going to say about what.  But he was concerned about college at the time, and he said, “What college do you think I should go to?”  Wynton said, “Well, I was only in school for a year.  Talk to this man; he’s been in school four years.”  I said, “Well, I can’t really recommend one for you to go to for what you want to learn, but I can tell you one not to go to.”  Then I started to tell them my story, because then I was going to transfer schools.  Wynton said, “I had no idea what was going on,” my situation at the time.  He said, “You want to stay out here and play for a while?”  I thought about it for about all of ten seconds and I said, “Yeah.”  I knew since eighth grade that I wanted to play, and I said, “What better opportunity?”  Schools are built on a solid foundation, bricks; they’re not going anywhere.   So at that point… It was supposed to be temporary.  Six months later, Wynton told me that he always knew he wanted me in the band, but he just needed to get some things together in order to bring me out.  That’s where it started, and that’s where my journey began with Wes, Eric, Todd Williams, Reginald Veal, Herlin Riley — just that collaboration.  That’s where my greatest training began.

TP:    And through that, I would imagine through extended experience with the repertoire that’s played in that band, you hear the building blocks jazz is based on from the inside out.

GORDON:  Definitely.

[MUSIC: “And The Band Played On“; “Sunday Soulful Supper“]

TP:    Ellington is one of the many composers whose repertoire you’ve both had a chance to explore thoroughly during your years with LCJO.  Talk about your predecessors in this music.  Wes, Johnny Hodges and Russell Procope were previous lead altoists.  How do their functions get transmuted into contemporary music and the music you play?

ANDERSON:  Well, whenever you play Ellington’s music, their presence is there.  Those key musicians, Johnny Hodges, Cootie Williams, Tricky Sam, Rufus Jones, Clark Terry, Britt Woodman, Harry Carney…

TP:    Prior to playing in the band, had you experienced playing in for-real type of saxophone section?

ANDERSON:  Yes.  When I was younger, sitting in the section was a good friend of mine named Jimmy Cozier.  I don’t know how he did it, but in the basement of his mother’s house in Brooklyn, every Sunday, he would get these Basie and Ellington charts.  That’s how I learned how to read.  He would sit me next to one of the other alto players, Sam Furnace, and I learned to read by looking over his shoulder.  I’d sit right next to him, and learned how to phrase.  My Dad would be playing drums, and every Sunday we’d go over and play.  I learned how to play in the section, how to interpret the music, how to lead — I’d sit next to the lead alto, the second alto.  So I got experience at an early age, 13-14 years old.  After that I was in the Jazzmobile program, Frank Foster, and got a chance to play more of that Basie chair.  Then going down to school, I got a chance to play in a big band at college, Southern University.

TP:    That was under Alvin Batiste.  Talk about his approach.

ANDERSON:  He’s down to earth.  There’s nothing superficial about him.  I walked into the bandroom, and I was the only person from New York, who came down to go to school.  First thing, he wanted to make sure to clear the air so there were no attitudes.  When I walked in, he said, “Oh, okay you’re the boy from New York, huh.  Yeah, I can see you got the big feet.”  Everybody fell out laughing.  I said, “Okay, this is going to be a ribbing contest.”  So he immediately let me know we were working at ground zero.  We were strictly about music and having a good time and just teaching at a very down-to-earth level.  He would put everything in a very real perspective.  In a lot of the jazz programs, sometimes it’s a little too antiseptic.  You have to have the feeling of being on a bandstand or know what it is to be on a bandstand.  I call it having jazz etiquette.  You have to know the feeling… It’s like on-the-job training.  We might have a class three times a week from 11 to 12, Monday-Wednesday-Friday, but then he would have a gig for the big band maybe at the Hilton Hotel or some kind of social engagement, he’d take the band, and you would never know what he was going to do, and he’d put you in a real environment where you had to perform.  He’d split the band up into small combos and say, “We’re going to show you how to handle yourselves on the bandstand outside of school.  You can’t learn everything three days a week, Monday-Wednesday-Friday.”

TP:    What type of charts was he playing?  Also, in that basement band as a teenager.

ANDERSON:  At college, he would give us the freedom.  He would give us some charts that he wrote out.  He’d write out some big band charts, people would be dancing… A little bit of everybody’s charts.  We’d have some Frank Foster charts, Clark Terry, Duke, Basie… Over the years he had collected charts from a lot of artists who came down.  Dizzy played.  So he had a lot of guest artists come and play his music.

TP:    Would you play his original music ever?

ANDERSON:  Oh yes, definitely.  And it would be hard.  Trust me.  It’s very challenging.  Because he is a person who explores every register of his instrument.  He is a very fine clarinetist who can play five or six octaves.  And I mean play them.  I’m not talking about pecking out one or two notes.  He can play anything in a five-octave range on his clarinet with ease and versatility.  A lot of people don’t know about him; they need to check him out.  It would be very challenging, because he’d have a chart on a melody he wrote for “Giant Steps.”  He’d have all these kids who hadn’t even heard of John Coltrane and didn’t even know what a giant step was, and he’d have a full big band arrangement with an ensemble section where everybody’s playing in unison this written-out solo of something he’s been working out for five years.  I mean, it  really challenging!  Even for me, because being in New York I’d had a chance to go to clubs and jam sessions and cutting sessions and stuff like that.  But it still was challenging to be in, like I say, a work-study environment.

TP:    So you had a pretty sophisticated conception of jazz going down there, but that gave you functional everyday experience.  It sounds almost analogous to working in a band.

ANDERSON:  Oh, definitely.  That was the experience that I got out of it.  A lot of jazz programs are too school-structured in that you don’t have the experience of playing every night, or working with a band and knowing what it is to get in a section and really gel with a saxophone section or a trombone section.  Playing those Basie charts, you have to get that Kansas City swing in them when you play them.  When you play “One O’Clock Jump” or things like that, it has to be jumping.  It has to be like Saturday night in…

TP:    It has to sound like it was conceived.

ANDERSON:  Yeah.  You can have the notes there and play them.  But you have to have that feeling.  You have to be thinking about Basie when you’re playing the music.

TP:    Was that when you began picking up the sopranino saxophone?

ANDERSON:  Oh, I didn’t pick that up until much later, in Wynton’s band.  Like I said, playing jazz music, you have to get out there and play it.  Like Ken Peplowski was saying earlier, you don’t see a lot of musicians hanging out and getting together and playing like they used to.  Well, you see it at places like Small’s, where musicians get together and play late night, which is good.  We need more musicians to come and get together and just play.  Don’t wait for no gigs.  Play.

TP:    This has to do with playing a huge spectrum of music that begins in 1923 and spans the whole history of jazz.  Let’s say you’re in the section of the LCJO and you’re playing some Ellington material.  When is it time to forget about emulating the people who played the music originally and be just you?

ANDERSON:  As soon as we start rehearsal!  Everybody has a conception, of course.  I’m playing the first alto chair, so the first thing I’m thinking of is how to emulate the way Johnny Hodges is playing.  Sometimes you can kind of psych yourself out by trying to actually imitate that person, which you will never be able to do.  That’s like trying to imitate Charlie Parker or Louis Armstrong.  Physically your lips and body structure isn’t exactly the same as the other person.  The other person comes from another era.  I was born in 1960; this person was born in 1900 or 1901.  So he has a different outlook on life and the way he approaches playing.  You can trying until you’re blue in the face; you can forget it.

TP:    What are the challenges of Johnny Hodges’ style?  What unique characteristics made him one of the prime masters of the alto saxophone, and what are the challenges of trying to incorporate those qualities into playing the alto?

ANDERSON:  The hardest thing is the nuances that he played with.  The saxophone stuff is structured.  There’s 22-23 keys on it.  But everyone has their own interpretation of it.  And he can interpret certain notes on a horn that’s just inconceivable.  Like, a middle-C in the saxophone is an unusual note.  So everyone has their own personal way they play it, and a high D is totally different.  There were certain things he was just a master of.  He could gliss on a saxophone up and down like it was a trombone.  That’s how he would conceive of it.  A saxophone has an even temperament, each key has a different tonal quality, a different sound — and he plays it as if it’s a slide, as if you’re sliding up and down, as if somebody was singing.  A lot of the musicians would tell me, “Man, you have to get more of a vocal quality when you’re playing.”  That’s the sound he would have.  He studied with Sidney Bechet, so when you listen to Johnny Hodges, you’re listening to a second generation of Sidney Bechet.  When you hear Sidney Bechet, that’s the Daddy of the saxophone to me!  He had so much nuance of expression.  You can press keys and play notes all day long, but to get the expression out of the instrument… It’s like he’s playing straight from his throat and the horn happened to be stuck in his mouth when he was singing.  That’s the feeling.  So that’s the hardest thing about playing in certain bands, or playing the music of Ellington or Basie or any great band, is trying to capture that feeling, that good swinging feeling.  The way that Duke Ellington section played, that was a landmark section.  You can’t get a section like that.  Basie’s section, Fletcher Henderson’s section, things like that.  Dizzy’s trumpet section in the big bands — you’re not going to get sections like that.

TP:    The Ellington saxophone section and the Ellington trombone section were the most distinctive sounds in jazz.  Wycliffe, I’d like to address the same question to you about the interpretation of classic jazz, or whatever term you’d want to lay on it.

GORDON:  First of all, in my approach to Duke’s music, you can’t help but hear the sound.  It was great.  You associate Johnny Hodges or you associate Lawrence Brown.  I mean, it’s hard not to just hear that when you’re playing.  But when I’m playing, I don’t necessarily want to sound like Lawrence Brown… To expand on Wes: You are ultimately reaching for what they did.  They were masters at expressing their personalities, and that’s what I think made Duke’s band great.  He knew how to use the musicians he had.  He wrote for the sound he had.  He had a customized sound.  You can take that same music and give it to a high school or even a college band, and they’re not going to… They’ll read the music… I run into that all the time, with stage bands or whatnot.  But the highest level that we try to achieve in jazz is the highest level of your self-expression.  That takes work.  It’s easy, but it’s like the difference between a child and a man.  A man can have childish qualities, but a man can only be a man.  A child can’t be a man.  And it comes through your experiences, and just working on the music and shedding.  So when I play Duke’s music or anyone’s music, I want to get into that mindset, “Yeah, this is Duke’s music.”  But I want to put my personality on it.  If I was fortunate enough to play with Duke, that’s what I feel he would want from me, and that’s what I think he wanted from his musicians.  He wanted the highest level of musicality, but also the highest level of themselves.

TP:    He’d hire them because of their personality and individual sound.  That was the characteristic of an Ellington band, that everyone would have such an individual sound.  Wycliffe, in your repertoire, you’re playing maybe “Mood Indigo” or something else and getting a quality of Tricky Sam Nanton.  In another piece you might be getting the quality of Britt Woodman or Lawrence Brown on another.  But in another, they’d be put more into certain roles.  So you’re having to deal with a whole range of approaches and integrate them into your personality.

ANDERSON:  Yes.  Mmm-hmm.

GORDON:  That’s the beauty of it, how you have those options.  You have to work on those things, but you have those options to do it.  That’s what I want to do.  I don’t want to sound like J.J., I don’t want to sound like Kai — I mean, great trombonists.  I’d love be able to play like them.  Or to even just play at the way that they play.  When I say I don’t want to sound like them…I do.  But I don’t want to just be classified, “Oh, he sounds like J.J.” or “He sounds like Jack Teagarden.”  I’d like to be able to reach into a bag, and if I want to play one way, then I can play one way; if I want to play another way… I want to deal with the whole realm of playing trombone and jazz trombone history, from Tricky Sam up to whomever.

TP:    How have you approached that?  By transcribing solos off of records?  By dealing with the demands of the music as presented to you within concerts?

GORDON:  I haven’t done that much transcribing solos lately.  I do listen.  I pick things that I like.  Because the trombone is an instrument where it’s very easy to sound nasty.  I hear recordings of myself playing in high school, and just slopping over the music.  It’s very hard to articulate on trombone, again because of those physical things that we must deal with.

TP:    I think part of the whole process of playing trombone is getting over the innate awkwardness of creating sound from it.

GORDON:  True.  Anyway, I want to be able to do that.  If I want to pick my horn up and sound… I want to be able to play whatever I’m feeling at the moment.  Last night I played “Mood Indigo” and I wanted to deal with multiphonics.  So I sang the melody and played the bass line at the same time.  If I want to play plunger, then I’ll pick the plunger up, and I’ll think about Tricky Sam Nanton, but then I try to go past that and just deal with sounds that I’m hearing.  I like to experiment, and try to be musical at the same time and not make noise, which is one of the easiest things to do — just pick it up and BRRAAAP-BRRAAP, just noise.  I want to make music, and I want to be able to reach, touch or just move somebody, just conversate, not playing music as if you’re going to the waffle house and they put the jukebox on and they’re talking and eating.  I want people to listen when I’m playing, and at the same time I want to give them something to listen to.  I think that’s something that we as musicians are all striving for — communication amongst each other on stage and a communication amongst our listeners.

[MUSIC: LCJO, “Black and Tan Fantasy,” Marcus-Wes-Gordon, “Nebuchadnezar“]

TP:    You mentioned Wes, off-mike, a paradox of working in a band that works as much as Wynton Marsalis’ group did, was that a lot of people felt they couldn’t get you for their gig or whatever, so you wouldn’t get that many calls, which is one reason why so many people from that band tend to work together.

ANDERSON:  Well, we used to call it in the band “the dreaded Marsalis curse.”  Once you were in the band, no one wants to hire you!  We would kind of laugh about it.  So we would say, “You got to keep swinging, you got to keep playing the music, you can’t wait for somebody to call you.”  So whenever Marcus or Eric or anyone else would do a record, we wound up using the same people, the same rhythm section, the horns might have been different or we might have thrown two or three other people in it… But basically we called the Crescent City Connection, which is Herlin Riley, Reginald Veal and Marcus or Eric.

TP:    What makes that rhythm section so distinctive.  We were speaking of Herlin Riley’s New Orleans heritage.

ANDERSON:  First, you have Herlin Riley and Reginald Veal, who are both from New Orleans, who are deeply rooted in playing jazz music, but in knowing how to play actual grooves.  When you play groove type music… Both those musicians come from out of the church, so they’ve had experience with playing for long periods of time and what we call laying in the pocket, what we call in funk music staying in the pocket, where you just keep one consistent groove going all the time, the way you would hear in James Brown’s music.  That’s what made his music so great, is the groove; his rhythm section stayed in the pocket.  His drummer was one of the most pocket-oriented drummers you could have, and the bass player and the guitar player.  That actually stems from New Orleans music, that same polyphony, that each individual person has a specific role, and you stack it together.  In New Orleans music, you have the trumpet, which plays a melody, the trombone plays a tailgate party and the clarinet plays an obbligato part — you put that all together, and you have a New Orleans sound.  The drums play a specific rhythm.  The bass has a specific role that it plays, and the tuba, the banjo, what have you.  Everyone has something specific, and you put it all together and you get something great.  You get this group improvisation.

So when you have that base for a rhythm section, it’s like any of the great rhythm sections that we listen to on records, like Philly Joe Jones or Paul Chambers.  That is like a glove.  They work together.  Wynton Kelly-Jimmy Cobb.  It’s just peanut butter and jelly.

TP:    You have one of the most adept young drummers with you this week, Greg Hutchinson.

ANDERSON:  Oh yes, that’s another one.  I like to hear Greg with Eric Reed.  You have to get them together.

GORDON:  It makes a big difference when you get musicians who like to play together.  The two of them like to play together — along with Ben Wolfe.  They have conversations without opening their mouths.  Sometimes they have conversations with their mouths open.  But they love to play together.  Eric loves the way Greg plays, Greg loves the way that Eric plays, and Ben fits in with them.  So that makes a big difference in the music.  If the rhythm section is tight, then you’ve got the first thing to making a great band.

TP:    I think the great advantage for musicians who are working together for any period of time is that through familiarity and the creative process, they’re able to have ongoing and developing musical conversations with each other in a very intuitive way.  That does seem to happen with the two of you up there.  Talk about musical intuition and how it works.

GORDON:  Musical intuition comes naturally, first of all, from years of playing with Wes, even though he’s on the other side of the bandstand.

TP:    And you’re trying to make him laugh.

GORDON:  Well, I try to make him laugh every now and then.  Sometimes I just laugh at him because he’s always messing with his reed or twisting something or flapping his ears or something like that.  Anyway, we would constantly have conversations about that.  That’s one thing we would do in the Wynton Marsalis Band that I can’t say from experience, but I’m almost sure it doesn’t happen on a nightly basis on most bandstands in America.  After every gig, if Wes didn’t sound good… I know many nights, if I didn’t sound good to myself, “I’m sorry.”  We’d apologize each if we thought we played something sad, and then at intermission or after the gig on the bus at night, at 3 o’clock in the morning when we’re eating sandwiches and potato chips and all kind of mess, we’ll talk about why was this sad or what made this good.  We were constantly talking about ways to make the music sound better and that we are always listening.  If I’m not doing something, or if Reed hears something that can make what I’m playing sound better, then I’ll do it.  Or Ben Wolfe or Herlin.  That’s the great thing about having a good rhythm section that listens.  We also have to do that.  Sometimes Wes may bring some music that he doesn’t have harmony for, or I’ll do the same thing, then we’ll harmonize.  Sometimes there are those magical moments on stage where we’re both hearing the same thing.  That happens from time to time.  But again, it comes from years of playing.  Again, I know how Wes likes to play, and I think he knows how I like to play.  So if I want to get him to do something, I’ll do something that he’ll know exactly where I’m going with it — and vice-versa.

TP:    A few words about choosing repertoire for this group.

ANDERSON:  Everybody in this band loves to play, someone like Ben Wolfe…

GORDON:  “Bebop” Wolfe.

ANDERSON:  He’s a Bebop specialist, but he knows a lot of tunes.  He’s worked with a lot of singers.

TP:    Well, I’ve heard people refer to you as a Bebop specialist.

ANDERSON:  No, not really.

GORDON:  Yes!  Every morning on the bus!  If we leave at 3 o’clock in the morning or if we leave at 8 o’clock in the morning, Wes has his bebop playing, religiously, every day, and when we can’t hear it, he has it on the headphones.

TP:    But the repertoire of the band is quite diverse.

ANDERSON:  Oh, sure.  Well, everybody writes in the band, and we get a chance to play everybody’s music — or attempt to play it — and everybody has a different period in jazz which they like to play.  Which makes the gig, I think, a lot more pleasing to listen to for someone who is just a casual listener.  Wycliffe might be playing “Mood Indigo,” then I might come up and play “Transition,” then Eric might want to play something from the trio school of Ahmad Jamal or Oscar Peterson or something like that, then we might play something from Benny Golson or from Ellington.  So you get a quick hour-and-15-minute anthology of jazz.  At least we try to every set.  And it gives us a nice variety.  We try to incorporate a lot of grooves, try to play ballads — just try to make it a fun set.  So when people come, you can escape for one or two or three sets.  We try to cover the whole history of jazz and have a good time doing it.  That’s how we get along.

************

Wess Anderson on Alvin Batiste (July 10, 2007):

TP:   I particularly want to talk to you about Alvin Batiste and what was distinctive about his pedagogy, what unique, and in terms of his identity as a Louisianan.

WESS:   I came down from New York to study with him. The first thing I realized is that Alvin taught more hands-on experience, meaning not teaching jazz studies, but teaching jazz. He would always take us with him or put us in a situation where we could actually produce the music. An example would be a jazz improv class. We would learn the songs, and then he would take us to the hotel and actually perform at a private function and allow us to be able to develop and at the same time learn how to perform a gig.

TP:   So he’d put you on gigs.

WESS:   Definitely. First, he would materialize a gig. Or somebody would call him and say, “I need a group.” But he wouldn’t let us know. It would correspond with the class. So he would say, “Okay, the class is going to go to Hilton Hotel in the banquet room for a performance from 8 to 11. You have three hours of music with a break.” So he’d give us 11 tunes for each half.  He would show us that we had to have a variety of tempos, all the logistics that need to go along with it. The gig would be in four months, so you had a chance to practice and perform and run through… Every time the class would meet, it would be in preparation, like a rehearsal for the gig. As a musician, you understand when you went into a class, that he was preparing you for what you need to be doing once you left school to become a professional musician. Every class was like that.

TP:   That’s something I’ve heard a number of successful teachers doing not just in college, but high school also. Someone told me that Robert Morgan in Houston does this now… That wasn’t something you did as a kid in New York.

WESS:   No. In New York, it was separate. I went to Jazzmobile. You know how Jazzmobile works, where you go in all day and study with great musicians. But it was in a classroom, like a laboratory.

TP:   It wasn’t just practicum with Mr. Batiste, was it? Was there anything about the way he taught curriculum that was distinctive to him?

WESS:   Yes. He created the whole curriculum himself. His curriculum was based on improvisation. He taught musicians how to be improvisers. It wasn’t just jazz studies. A lot of his students are in gospel music. They’re in pop music, like Randy Jackson, who used to work for the group Journey. He spoke at his funeral. A lot of his students went in a lot of different directions. One guy used to work with a pop group. Whatever level you were at, that’s where he started with you. When I came from New York, he was shocked… I assumed I had to have an audition prepared. My dad took me to the studio to prepare my audition tape, and I played Monk’s “Played Twice.” My dad said, “play something that lets them know what you’re on. But a lot of people came down who didn’t know about Thelonious Monk. When I first got down there, he said, “I see, you’ve been saturated with bebop.” So immediately he saturated me. He sent me on a gig to New Orleans to play in a second line band, and I had never even heard what that was. I played a Mardi Gras.

He knew exactly what level everybody was on. He knew I hadn’t known about the history of the music. He took me away from what I knew. He knew, “Okay, you’re the sax player with Charlie Parker.” So somebody called and said, “Hey, I need somebody to play in Doc Palmer’s marching band in Mardi Gras.” So he sent me on the Greyhound. I said, “Where are you sending me?” He said, “I’m going to show you about the history of the music.” First he was talking about Sidney Bechet and Louis Armstrong; I wasn’t really familiar with them. He said, “Well, we have some recordings in the school library,” but he said, “You’re 60 miles away from New Orleans; I know what I’m going to do with you.” He sent me down on the Greyhound. He said, “Wear  black pants and a white shirt, have your axe, and be ready to march.” I said, ‘Okay.” Next thing I know, we’re playing “Little Liza Jane” and “Down By the Riverside,” and I said, “What the heck is this?” After six hours of marching, then I figured it out. I said, ‘Okay, this I something totally different.” I didn’t know how to play inside of a second-line band, playing with two other saxophones and a tuba and a trombone and trumpet. When I got back, he said, “Did you understand the polyphony?” I said, “Yeah, everybody was playing something different.” He said, “Yeah, that’s three-part harmony.” “Oh!” Then, after I actually played it, he started playing some music with Sidney Bechet and then Louis Armstrong.

TP:   He threw you into the water to see how well you could swim, and then refined it.

WESS:   Then I understood it because then I was around it. But he was always hands-on. Always. One or two friends of mine graduated who came from the American Baptist Church, and he knew that they were strong musicians in the church. So they were in the big band, but at the same time, whenever we had a performance that had to go into the church, he had them prepare all the music. We’d be playing a (?) Smokes arrangement of “Abide With Me” in the church, with the horns.  He’d have them arrange it, because they knew about that music. Then everybody who didn’t know about it in the rhythm section learned as we went through two or three church services. So he’d have the big band play the church service, we did a jazz funeral… It was unbelievable.

TP:   That’s quite singular.

WESS:   They’re not doing that at most schools!

TP:   So it was less about the pedagogy or the way he taught theory as much as to teach you how to apply the theory you knew.

WESS:   Exactly. He always taught ear training. He trained your ear how to hear. A lot of musicians who came there couldn’t read. There were only a few of us who could read. He would sit down and practice with you. This is what I thought was really great. Whenever we did an improv class, at first I felt, “I’m more advanced, and these other people don’t know ‘Giant Steps.’” He would write down the chord changes for the piano player, who had never heard the song before, and would play it with us slowly. If it took 3 or 4 hours for the person to learn each chord, he would show that. Then he would say, “Okay, repeat that 20 times.” Then he would show the bass player and the rest of the people, and while they’re learning that…you need to be doubling up while they’re learning that. He’d have us doing other things. He’d be playing with us. So it didn’t matter what level you’re on. Everybody would play “Giant Steps.”

TP:   Sounds like what Ellis Marsalis would do at NOCCA, when he’d write a series of notes that would turn out to be a blues, so you’d learn to play the blues just by playing those notes.

WESS:   So you could have people at different levels in one class, and still, when it came time at  the end of the year to play the New Orleans Heritage Festival… He would present a new band for each year, a big band, and we would break down into smaller groups. We’d have the big band playing for about 20 minutes, and then the quintet or an octet, something like that, or with a vocalist, and we’d perform the music we chose. I would perform a lot of Monk’s music, or Bird’s, then he’d switch me to another octet that was playing New Orleans music, or hardbop like Art Blakey.

TP:   So he didn’t make any differentiation either in terms of the timeline.

WESS:   No. He would play a tune called “Buddy Bolden’s Blues” that we all had to play in unison, while the rhythm section was playing a New Orleans groove, and then it would switch over and he’d start playing “Transitions” by John Coltrane with the same groove on it. So all of it was modern.

TP:   He retired not long after you left Southern. Around ’87.

WESS:   I think so, yes. But then he went back part-time again. He was a tireless teacher.

TP:   What was his core curriculum? The requirements?

WESS:   Learn what he knew. That was his core.

TP:   But he had to devise… Well, I guess he had a sympathetic boss.

WESS:   Well, for the whole jazz studies curriculum you’d have 4 semesters of jazz improv, 4 semesters of big band, then ear training, harmony—the standard classes.

TP:   You’re Associate Professor of Saxophone at Michigan State University. (8 jazz teachers). Is any of that philosophy in your approach there?

WESS:   No, it’s actually… Rodney Whitaker is the Director. We always talk about this. He met Alvin years ago in a workshop when he was going to Wayne State. Rodney’s been trying to get me here for a long time. They said, “Well, this is Cannonball Adderley; he needs to be playing a Selmer.” so they gave him a horn, and his playing completely changed after that. This was about 3-4 years before he died. He was still playing the same way, but the sound of the horn makes you play a certain way. Me and McPherson always talks about that. McPherson says, “You have to find a horn that you like to express yourslf freely. Because everybody plays something different.” Selmer makes a great horn, it hasone of the best horns out there, but it’s very level. Everything is easy. It’s not going to go too loud. Not going to go too sharp, not too low, not too high, not too flat.

TP:   Well, he’s a student of Donald Washington who espoused that ancient-to-future idea of music. Because in his own work, Alvin Batiste was pretty avant-garde.

WESS:   Yes. But also he played with Billy Cobham’s band. But then he also played with Ray Charles. Then he played with Duke Ellington’s band. He had a lot of experience. When we played Ellington’s music, he would say, “This is what it sounds like,” and he would explain exactly what was going on.

Leave a comment

Filed under Alvin Batiste, Wes Anderson, Wycliffe Gordon, Wynton Marsalis

In Honor of Master Bassist Curtis Lundy’s 68th Birthday, the Transcript of our WKCR Musician Show from May 29, 1996

Curtis Lundy Musician Show on WKCR (May 29, 1996):
[MUSIC: Pharaoh Sanders, “Africa” – Pharaoh-Lundy-Idris—1987; John Hicks Trio, “Pas de Trois” – Hicks-Lundy-Idris–1987 (I’ll Give you Something To Remember Me By]
TP:   You’re from Florida, the home state of the great bassist Sam Jones and many other musicians. Let’s talk about your origins in music.
CL:    I started really dealing seriously with music, I guess you could say… When I was in junior high school, I played snare drum at the time in the concert band.
TP:   This was in Miami?
CL:   This was in Miami. Southwest Miami. I don’t know how many of your listeners know anything about Miami, but Southwest Miami is… When Hurricane Andrew came through there, it was the part that was most devastated. I’m thankful that my family was all right through that experience. But that’s below the Coconut Grove area and places like that.
TP:   Is your family musical?
CL:   I guess you could say that…
TP:   We have to give your sister Carmen Lundy a plug; she’s beginning a week this evening at Sweet Basil, through Sunday. But where did it come from? Parents? Family? Natural inclination?
CL:   I think it came from my mother’s side of the family, with the deep gospel tradition that was in our family, and just the love of music of all kinds. I had a couple of aunts who played piano, and an uncle… Basically, all of my mother’s siblings knew something about music, just because of the love of music and the praise that they would give the Creator for giving them the life that they had.
TP:   Were you absorbing music through them?
CL:   Yes.
TP:   Were they giving you tips or lessons? Or just hearing the ebullience of it?
CL:   Just hearing it, and being in the environment almost on a daily basis. If not actually being in church, just being overwhelmed by my mother’s ability to be such a great singer and not go at it from a commercial point of view. That’s something that was striking to me also. But my grandfather also played a little guitar. My mother and most of my aunts had a singing group called the Apostolic Singers, and my grandfather would manage the group. They used to do concerts with people like the Staples Singers and people like that, when the Staples Singers were still singing exclusively gospel music. That experience, being around…
The accompanist for the group would change once in a while. I remember they had this one cat who was…I could tell that he was… I thought he was kind of from Mars at the time, because I was about 6 or 7 years old, and he was trained in the jazz and classical tradition. When he came to play with my mother and her group, I was like, “Wow, this cat is playing some different stuff!” I’ll never forget it. His name was George. I never knew his last name or anything. But he was bad. My mother and all of the other singers in the group really dug him because he played some different stuff. He would be like Hicks coming in and joining a gospel group. He was that kind of cat. I still remember that. He left that kind of impression on me.
TP:   Any records of jazz particularly that you heard as a youngster before taking up snare drum in that concert band? When did you first become aware of it?
CL:   I heard boogie-woogie piano music and some stride stuff, because my aunt would play some of that stuff. But actually, it was almost taboo to play that in my grandfather’s house. So whenever he wasn’t there, they would sneak and cut a few tunes…
TP:   Because it was the “devil’s music”?
CL:   So to speak, yes.
TP:   So you came up in a very intensely religious environment.
CL:   You could say that. Yeah, you could say that.
TP:   The Spirit was there.
CL:   The Spirit was there. But it was cool, because my people were realists, too. They would allow us to experience life on life’s terms, but at the same time they never let us lose the focus, which in my formative years proved to be very good for me, and later on in my life and to this very date has shown to be something that I can draw on as a reserve for my personal strength to move to whatever direction I’m trying to move in.
TP:   Let’s jump back to junior high school and the snare drum. What was the musical program like?
CL:   Actually, I had a great junior high school band director. His name was Mr. Valentine. He was on the same level as…you know, when cats out of Chicago talk about Captain Dyett and DuSable and all those schools like that… Well, Mr. Valentine was that level. He was a great musician, and his family…his father was also a great musician and composer and arranger. Mr. Valentine was the kind of cat that whatever… If somebody missed a note or missed a beat or anything on any instrument in the band, he could pick the instrument up and play what was supposed to happen. He would let them know in no uncertain terms, “don’t let it happen again or else somebody else is going to be sitting in your chair.”
TP:   What sort of music did he have you play?
CL:   We played symphonic music and we played march…a lot of Sousa stuff and things like that. We were one of those bands that would go those band competitions. The State of Florida is kind of famous for that.
What happened was, the turnover in the band… I joined the band when I was in 7th grade, I think. Every year, the new class would get a chance to audition for the band and to start preparing themself musically. What would happen, we would have to play some of the same music during the interim of those periods, because they had to get a chance to learn some of the music that we were already playing. I kind of got bored with doing all the time, so what I used to do was start improvising on the music…
TP:   Were you past the snare drum at this point?
CL:   No, I was still playing the snare drum. Because I dug the snare drum. Whenever I would improvise… We used to have a little crew, me and a couple of my partners, and each section would do something — what we would call “making it funky.” But Mr. Valentine was a disciplinarian. He didn’t go for that, to put it lightly. So I ended up getting kicked out of the band. But I think that was a good lesson for me — to show me that it takes discipline to deal with music, too. Even though I was a pretty good section player, he had to teach us a lesson about the discipline of music, and I’m glad that it happened, when I looked back at it, because later on in life I realized that was important for me.
TP:   What led you to the bass?
CL:   Well, after I got kicked out of the band, I think that next year… Christmas was coming up. All of my friends were getting little motorcycles and minibikes and stuff, so of course I wanted one, too. So my mother told me, “Forget about that; what’s your second choice?” I always loved music, and at the time Motown was really happening and all of that stuff was going on. I guess I had felt some kind of probably resentment toward the snare drum because I’d had a bad experience with that with the band. I always liked the rhythm section and I liked the bass, and I asked my mother for a bass. So she bought me an electric bass, and I just started learning how to play on my own, and learning all the tunes of the time…
TP:   What did you do? You listened to the records and the radio, and just listened to the basslines?
CL:   Yeah, I listened to James Jamerson. I listened to all the stuff that was happening then, in particular cats like James Jamerson, Bootsy, I really dug Willie Weeks. Cats like that. Cats who could really play the Fender, but also, as I found out later on, those same guys also knew something about the instrument and about the upright, so their approach to the electric bass was very rhythmic as opposed to playing a lot of notes. They really understood the function of the bass, and that was important to me.
TP:   Talk a bit more about that function of the bass that they understood. That seems to have been imbibed by you from the very beginning of your playing?
CL:  It was. I always felt that the bass…if you would look at the anatomy of the body, the bass is the heartbeat, along with the drums… But if I were to break it down, the drums are the heartbeat but the bass is what makes the blood flow through the veins. That’s the approach to the instrument that I enjoy. For me, listening to those kinds of bass players, I understood that the function of the bass was not to get in the way, but also to be tasteful and to accent the beat. That’s something that I always liked and I always try to do when I play, even to today. Because a lot of bass players sometimes, I think, get away from the function of the instrument — and that’s very important.
TP:   It’s an interesting point, jazz music being a music of personalities, and many bassists having personalities just as strong musicians…how to articulate that personality while remaining true to the function of the instrument. This perhaps is a question for later, but since we’re on it, how do you deal with that?
CL:   I allow myself to let the music dictate what I play, as opposed to forcing it. I’m the kind of person that if I find…if there’s a hole that needs to be filled, I try to fill it properly, but I also try not to overflow the glass, so to speak. It’s a very fine line between those two. But when you look at people like… I think one of my best examples (now in hindsight, I think about it) of someone who could do that would be Israel Crosby. He knew how to keep the glass full and not overflow. That was the approach that… I tried to steer myself in that direction.
TP:   It’s time to get to our first musical segment. We’ll keep in mind that in our narrative, Curtis has taken up the electric bass and he’s practicing to James Jamerson and Willie Weeks and Bootsy as a teenager in Miami.
This set will focus on music by Paul Chambers, one of your personal musical heroes. We’ll begin with a piece titled “Visitation” from a 1956 recording he led for the Jazz West label – the Paul Chambers Quartet with John Coltrane on tenor saxophone, Kenny Drew on piano, and Philly Joe Jones on drums.
[MUSIC: Paul Chambers 4, “Visitation”-1956; Sonny Clark Trio, “Two Bass Hit”-1957; PC, “Easy To Love”–1956 Jazz West; Sonny Clark Trio, “Tadd’s Delight”–1957–PC & Philly Joe]
TP:   What brought you to the acoustic bass?
CL:   I think around my 9th grade year, I would venture… Even though I was kicked out of the band, I used to go back into the band room, and I started seeing these instruments in there, this bass fiddle in there, with all this dust on it. I would just play around with it then. It wasn’t really in good shape. And for some reason, at the time, the orchestra part of music in my junior high school was not happening, I guess for the lack of people who were interested in playing string instruments or whatever. But the first time I ever heard the instrument, I really dug it. But I didn’t really get a chance to start dealing with it until I got to high school in tenth grade. I was playing football at the time…
TP: You were a defensive back, right?
CL:   Right. Actually, linebacker and defensive back. Something kept pulling me toward really dealing with the music. I guess the fact that for me, teaching myself how to play the electric bass and starting to learn how to deal with reading music and stuff like that… I started working a lot from the age of 14 on up. I started getting quite a lot of work, playing.
TP:   What sort of work?
CL:   At the time, Miami Beach was still the place to be, “the playground for the stars” and all that kind of stuff. I had put together a band that basically did top-40 stuff and different things, a lot of Donnie Hathaway stuff, things like that. We had a pretty good band, and we would get a lot of calls to work on Miami Beach. At that time, it was quite lucrative because the scene was still happening. I don’t think it was so much the money that motivated me, but just the fact that the art… For some reason, I related to the art of the music more than I did the financial expectations that some people look at.
TP:   You learned quickly. You started at 13; by 14 you’re…
CL:   Yes, I was working a lot.
TP:   So in high school, you’re on the football team, and in the school band…not in the school band, but instead working on various gigs…
CL:   Yes, I was working a lot playing the electric bass. But at the same time, after football season was over… There was a group in my high school called the Killian Singers. This group was basically a pop vocal music group that was based in our high school. My sister was part of that group, and some really good singers at that time. They asked me if I wanted to play the bass. I think at the same time, if you played football in Miami you also had to run track and you had to do that kind of stuff to stay in shape for football. So I was also running track, and I didn’t feel like lugging my electric bass to school every day to play with these singers, because to me, they were doing this kind of corny…what I felt at the time was corny pop music… I don’t want to call the titles off, but some things that really hit my main nerve — let’s put it like that. But still, once in a while, they’d come up with some hip stuff. I happened to look in the closet once again, and there was an upright bass in there. So I thought: Listen, maybe I’ll try to play this bass and learn how to do this. That’s when I first started really wanting to get serious about it.
After that, after my sister saw that I could pretty much get a tone on the instrument, she started playing a few records around the house. At the time, Freddie Hubbard… “Red Clay” and all that stuff was happening. That’s really some of the first stuff I started listening to, that kind of stuff, CTI stuff, things like that, until I started doing some investigating on my own.
TP:   Well, Ron Carter was on some of those dates.
CL:   Yeah, exactly. I heard that, and I said, “Yeah, I like that.” So I started really trying to get serious about the instrument then.
TP:    Did you study with someone?
CL:   No. I kind of taught myself for a little while, and actually I taught myself until I went to college. Then I hooked up with one of the greatest classical bassists that’s probably alive today, Lucas Drew, at the University of Miami. He was my teacher. I spent a lot of time with him. Not as much time as I could have. But I spent enough time with him to understand two or three different things that are really important: #1, that the instrument is an instrument of nobility, and that you need to take it very seriously; #2, the fact that he felt I had some natural inclinations toward the instrument; and #3, that he respected this music that we call jazz.
I’ll never forget one of the main statements he made to me. He was pushing me towards the classical vein and learning that music, and that was great. But for some reason I felt I needed to tell him that I wanted to be a jazz bassist. He said, “Well, all of the great bass players can do this.” That put me right in the place I needed to be.
TP:   That includes Paul Chambers, whose music we just heard. There are stories of his ability to go into a situation like that and read something down and play with great virtuosity…
CL:   Exactly.
TP:   Did you discover his music around this time? Is this when you started exploring records, and getting a bit further into it than the contemporary CTI albums?
CL:   Definitely. Around this same time I started… The first cat I really got into was Ray Brown. Then one day I got this Miles record with Paul, and I think for about 6 months straight I just listened to that.
TP:   Let’s talk about the stylistic dynamics and approach to the bass that have affected you and so many other bass players similarly.
CL:   Well, first of all, his tone is remarkable. His intonation is flawless. His ability, as you said, to go into any situation and not overshadow anybody in the same way, say, someone like Art Blakey could do. Be the ultimate sideman but also step to the forefront and demand attention from the listener, not just the musicians. That’s important to me. Today, I feel that a lot of musicians…this is just how I feel, so you can take it for what it’s worth… A lot of musicians play musicians for musicians, and they don’t play music for the people. That kind of bugs me. Because the music is for the people; it’s not for the musicians. Paul and the people of that generation played that way, to me. It’s a very formidable approach to the music, to have somebody know that it wasn’t the musicians that were important, but it was the listener, because without the listener, there is no music.
In terms of Paul’s prowess, there are so many things that, as you said, myself and other bass players have been able to get from him. The first thing is that, even if he never took a solo, he was a great bass player because of knowing his function in the rhythm section. He was just very special.
I look at music, and I guess life itself, in two categories. There are certain people who are gifted and then there’s people who are talented. Paul was one of those who was gifted. A lot of people search their whole life to do things the way that he did them on the instrument — and whatever instrument it is, not just the bass. He was gifted.
TP: He was 21 and 22 on the tracks we heard earlier, laying down timeless musical statements.
CL:   Exactly. I felt that if I would try to deal with that approach, I wouldn’t miss that far off the mark, and that’s what I try to do still to this day.
TP:   While attending the University of Miami, I gather that’s where you began to encounter a number of people who would be significant to you today. Was Bobby Watson there at the time?
CL:   Definitely. There was another cat who’s here on the scene, Benjamin Brown. When he came to New York, he was working with Dizzy a lot. Ben spent more time, very seriously, with Lucas Drew (the teacher I was talking about), and really got a lot of the things I should have gotten, and that today I’m still dealing with and working on. I really respect Ben a lot. He’s an excellent musician, a great bass player, and a good friend, too. He looked out for me. A few things that he could throw my way, he did at the time, when we were coming through. He kind of inspired me to let me know that a cat from way down in Miami could come to New York and make it. So he was an inspiration.
Also, Bobby, of course, was there. And there was a trumpet player who has since passed on, bless him. His name was Caesar Elie. He came to New York once or twice. He had a few personal problems. But he was a great trumpet player. By my taste, he was the best trumpet player I’ve ever heard in my life. It’s a shame that he won’t be heard any more. But he was everything that a lot of these cats out here would like to be. He was all of that. I met him, and Bobby and I had a band with him in it with another cat who’s down there now named John McMahon, who was a tenor player who sounded like Trane back then. Now he’s playing a lot of piano. There were a lot of cats who just were great musicians. I was fortunate enough that they felt I wanted to know the music and learn the music enough, and they gave me an opportunity to play.
TP:   In a certain, it seems you were really going against the grain. This is the mid-1970s, and fusion and disco are at its peak, and the electric side of the instrument…Jaco Pastorius, also from Miami…
CL:   Well, he’s from Fort Lauderdale, but he was there at the school. As a matter of fact, I studied with Jaco on the electric bass. I never stopped playing the electric bass. As a matter of fact, my first record date in New York was with Bobby, playing the electric bass on this Roulette record. I was scared to death, because it was the first time I got a chance to play with Billy Hart. I think Billy Higgins was also on the date. Roland Prince. It was a good date. That’s actually the first time I came to New York; I was still playing electric bass. But once I got here and I saw all these cats working on the upright exclusively, that was it for me. I was like, “Ok…”
TP:   By ‘against the grain’ I mean not so much playing the electric, but sticking with the idiom of jazz in the tradition. There must have been economic temptations, among others, to do otherwise. Or not?
CL:   Yes, there were. But at the same time, the band that I talked about that Bobby and I had (and my sister also) with this trumpet player who I mentioned, we played all of that stuff. At the time, it was kind of hard not to play “Mr. Magic” (know what I’m saying?) and all that kind of stuff. So we had to do that. But we also would go ahead and stretch out and play some things. We tried to make the musical mix somewhat also pleasing to the ear, but at the same time challenging to pay. To me, music also needs that challenge. I need that personally to keep driving me.
TP:   The subject of the next set of music will be Oscar Pettiford. We’ll hear tracks from the two small orchestra dates he recorded for United States in the mid-1950s.
CL:   After discovering Paul and being wiped out by him, I said, “Well, where did he get this from?” I started looking into it, and I found out that Oscar Pettiford was a source of his inspiration. So of course, I had to look into that. Sometimes, as a musician, when you find a cat who blows you away so much, you say, “Maybe let’s try to find somebody who can spoon-feed me a little bit.” I tried to do that with Oscar, and it was like, “Let me go somewhere else.”
But seriously, Oscar was once again a complete musician — an arranger, composer, and all those things. I wanted to investigate Paul’s inspiration, and I think I found it with Oscar. It was important for me to understand his function in the music, and during the timespan in which he lived, the importance of his life and what he gave to the music.
[MUSIC: OP, “The Gentle Art of Love”-1956; OP, “Tricotism”-1956, Lucky Thompson and Skeeter Best; OP, “Sunrise” (Gigi Gryce, arrangement)-1956–In Hifi]
CL:  As Dizzy I think said in these liner notes, at this time there were two geniuses of the bass (he felt) — that was OP and Blanton. Oscar for me really took the art of playing the instrument as if it was a horn to that level in terms of improvisation. Of course, Blanton was in the forefront of that, but Oscar really showed the capability of the bass as a solo instrument. That was important, if not for anything else, to show the bass players of that time, I think, to explore the instrument for all the musical qualities it offers, and I believe it was important for that to be heard. Also, by the same token, he was a great rhythm section player, and knew the function of the bass. That always impressed. There are bass players to this day who are wonderful soloists, but that’s the way they play — as if they are waiting for their solo. When I hear… No matter how good a bass player is able to play the instrument as a soloist, if he doesn’t play the function of the bass, I really… I have respect for him as a soloist but not as a bassist. Because that’s what the instrument is about.
TP:   In Miami at the time you were coming up, there was another bassist who is one of the great soloists and great composer and function player – that’s Israel Lopez, Cachao, in Latin music. Was that another element of your musical experience coming up in Miami?
CL:   Yes, it had to be. At that time, Latin music was starting to grow there, of course because of the influx of Cubans coming over. Being based in Miami, it was important to understand that type of music. I was fortunate, because at the time I had a steady gig that I think lasted two years at a place I think called Leisure Den, and at the time Cachao was working a block away. The drummer who was on the gig was this cat named Diego Abora(?—38:51), whose father played with Miles, and he was a very good drummer. He asked me one night on the break did I know Cachao. I said, “No, who is he?” He told me who he was. He said, “He’s working a block away.” So on the break we walked down to this club, which was a disco club, and there was this disco band playing. Latin disco band; they were playing some Latin stuff. Cachao was playing bass. The way they had the band set up, he was in the middle of the band, and he was burning, playing whatever he needed to play. But what really wiped is in the middle of one of these disco dance tunes he pulls out the bow, and takes this unbelievable solo. From then on I was a Cachao fanatic. Once again, he understood the function of the bass. Because right there, he was making people dance, which is another art that the music has moved away from but which I believe is important, too — to make people have that kind of feeling.
TP:   He’s also a master of tumbao as well as the strings – he works them simultaneously.
CL:   Yes. He did everything that I thought somebody could do with the bass that night. So from then on, on all of my breaks, I would go down and listen tohim. It proved to be a good experience for me, teaching me how to play that type of music also.
TP:   What brought you to New York?
CL:   Actually, the fact that I kept reading these record liner notes. I said to myself, after I’d made the decision that I wasn’t going to become a professional football player, that I was going to be a professional musician, New York was the place where all the great musicians were… My aspiration at the time was to play with the best musicians in the world, and they were in New York. After my sister came to New York and then Bobby came to New York, it was like everybody was leaving and I was the only one still there, so to speak. A lot of cats who I went to school with, like Hiram Bullock and Pat Metheny…these cats were coming to New York and making it. So I figured I could give it a try, too, and I came.
TP: What was step one?
CL:   Step one was learning that you have to have your own voice, and I think that’s something I learned from listening to Paul and Oscar, because even though I loved them, I still wanted to say something — or learn how to say something, which I’m still working on — that represented what Curtis Lundy was about and where he came from and what he stood for. That was step-1. I think I was able to start to approach that by just dealing with the sound of the instrument. At the time I  came to New York, I didn’t particularly like a lot of the stuff that I heard sound-wise. I liked what musicians were playing, and bass players in particular, but they didn’t get the sound of the bass that I thought was important. You have your exceptions, of course. But as a rule, I thought there was a void for that, and I tried in my own way to fill that void.
TP:   Step 2?
CL:   Step 2 was learning how to fit in any situation that was called for me musically, because at the time I came to New York, which was in the late 70s, the avant-garde music was still prevalent and even though I come from the swing tradition, I learned very quickly that you have to learn how to play all types of music here. I learned a lot from that experience, playing with people like Beaver Harris, the Reverend Frank Wright, people like that, who were a little bit to the left but their music still required discipline and knowledge of the instrument.
That was step 2, and I guess, if I can precede you here, step 3 was learning that life ain’t fair, heh-heh, that you have to take what’s given you and work it to your best ability to move forwards, to go to the next level.
TP:   Next we’ll hear from a musician who often expressed his view that life is not fair, and expressed many views in an impassioned and individualistic way — Charles Mingus. Your first exposure to Mingus’ music.
CL:   The first time I met Mingus, I was at a concert I think at Avery Fisher Hall. I think Bobby was playing with Art Blakey at the time, so I was allowed to come in and hang out with the cats. I saw Mingus, so I immediately ran up to him and asked him if he could show me anything about the bass. He said, “I don’t talk before I play.” Even though he said it in a demonstrative way, as only he could do, I felt good about him saying that to me, because it showed me how serious he was about the music. Then I heard him play some piano, and it showed me how musical this man was and how much he put towards learning about the shades and the colors of the music.
I think the first time that I heard Mingus was hearing “Goodbye Porkpie Hat,” and I knew this was an important figure in the jazz community. I started following him then.
TP:   Mingus’ main inspiration compositionally was Duke Ellington, and Jimmy Blanton on the bass. So “Mood Indigo” from 1963.
[MUSIC: Mingus, “Mood Indigo” – 1963; Ellington–Blanton, “Jack the Bear:-1940; Ellington-Blanton, “Sophisticated Lady”-1940; Ellington-Ray Brown, “Pitter Panther Patter”-This One’s For Blanton]
TP:   On the next set you’ll be hearing a taste of Curtis, some different situations. But first, a few words about Ray Brown, who you credit as your first jazz bass influence, and Jimmy Blanton.
CL:   I think that Ray Brown’s approach to the instrument is formidable. His sense of timing for me is important, because it showed me how to play, first of all, within the trio setting. A lot of the time, I guess before that, I was listening to a lot of horn bands, but I got turned on to Ray Brown playing with Oscar Peterson, and I started wanting to know more about who Ray Brown was recently. Then I found this record with Duke and Ray playing this tribute to Blanton, and then I went further and found out who Jimmy Blanton was. Ray Brown is still, to this day, one of my biggest influences, I would say. As I said before, although I try not to sound like one person in particular, I think Ray Brown is an important ingredient for every bass player to have as a part of their total sound and total approach to the instrument.
TP:   Before we discuss Jimmy Blanton, I’d like to speak with you about playing the different functions. As an instance, how you might vary your approach within a trio as opposed to playing in a band with horns, for instance, just to start?
CL:   We can go a little further and talk about duo playing.
TP:   A big part of a New York bassist’s job.
CL:   Exactly. I believe that to really understand the function of the bass, you’ve got to go all the way back to that. I’ve been fortunate to play in those type of settings with people like John Hicks and other pianists on the scene — but mostly I like to work with John a lot. He and I have a musical rapport that works for me. Also, John is so knowledgeable about the music that I’m always learning and being challenged by playing his compositions. Also, he’ll always dig something up that I should know. That’s one of the reasons why I love John so much. Without being overbearing about it, he’s always teaching. He’s always teaching me in particular about the history of the music and what I should know, and also playing the way that he plays influences me to learn more about the whole spectrum of music that I should be aware of — and it’s important.
For the bass, learning how to play in a duo setting makes you a stronger player in other settings. Because there’s no drums, and you have to know where the time is all the time, and you have to keep that support there. That’s important. I always tell bass players, “As much as you can, just play duo,” because it teaches you how to be a supportive instrumentalist, but at the same time it shows you how to play within the harmony and the textures of the music to a point where it’s a full sound — and that’s very important.
TP:   Let’s talk about a trio — say with John Hicks and Idris Muhammad or Victor Lewis. Then what do you do differently?
CL:   I let the drummer be more concerned with the beat and I am concerned with the rhythm, as opposed to duo playing where I’m concerned with the beat and the rhythm.
TP:   That’s the nature of the dialogue with the drums that’s part of any rhythm section.
CL:   Exactly. So it frees me up to be more rhythmic, but at the same time to interplay with the drummer in terms of different types of motifs we can get into musically just from the bass and the drummer’s point of view. It’s challenging to go from that setting to the trio setting, because it loosens you up, but it also helps you to understand that function is still there to be a part-of.
TP: Moving away from Professor Lundy’s incisive lecture on bass function, let’s move to a few words about Jimmy Blanton and his pathbreaking approach to the bass.
CL: The first time I heard Blanton, I couldn’t believe that he was doing the stuff that he was doing on the bass, and when he was doing it. It was unheard-of on that instrument at that time for somebody to be playing it like that. I was talking to you earlier about the fact that I’d heard the Sun Ra interview on this station, and how Sun Ra was saying that somebody had told him about Jimmy Blanton, and he missed getting Jimmy Blanton to play with him by two days. I’m serious. He went to St. Louis, I think, to go and see Blanton, and Duke had just got him two days before Sun Ra got there. That was interesting to me.
But Blanton, once again, being the predecessor of Oscar Pettitord, showed the bass as a solo instrument. He also showed that there were no limitations to what could be done on the instrument if you really studied the instrument and approached it from that point of view.
TP:  And he was working without an amplifier.
CL:   Exactly. His sound, once again; his approach to the instrument; and his understanding of the function within the band.
TP:   How about Mingus’ bass playing?
CL:   Mingus, I believe, again, was heavily influenced by Jimmy Blanton. His approach to music, not just the bass but his approach to music, was important for me to understand as a bassist… At the time I was learning how to start writing music and really how to become a composer and arranger at the same time. He was important for me because he was doing all of these things, and out of all these people we’ve played besides Ray Brown, I could see Mingus. That was important for me. I could see him play.
TP;   What’s the value of seeing a musician play vis-a-vis just hearing him on a recording?
CL:   Because you get a chance to see… It’s like a baseball player or a football player or a basketball player. It’s one thing to talk about Dr. J and hear the legend of him, but you can watch him and see how he does it, and watch the nuances of the way he approaches his game. It was the same thing musically. I got a chance to see how Mingus approaches his game, how he approached the instrument, how he approached music as a whole. The same thing with Sam Jones, Ray Brown, Ron Carter, people like that. It’s an invaluable experience to watch these people do the things that you are aspiring to do as a musician, and be able to see them do it. It gives you a better insight on how you can also do it, and do it in your own way.
Walter Bishop once said to me that there’s three different levels that usually happens with a musician. Imitation, assimilation, and innovation. Most people deal with the first two. Very rarely do we come up with innovators. I feel that in particular Jimmy Blanton, Oscar Pettiford and Paul Chambers are the innovators on that instrument. There are others who I believe did things that are very formidable, such as Slam Stewart. Ray, and Ron also. But in terms of being an innovator on the instrument, I really would stick with those three.
TP:   What’s the nature of Oscar Pettiford’s and Paul Chambers’ innovations?
CL:   I think for the time that they played the instrument, and the timespan that the played the instrument, they took it to the next level. Because if you notice, in the Blanton style of playing, he really didn’t…I’m not saying he couldn’t… But at that time, and for the style of the music, the way he played the walking bassline was not really…the way that evolved into the way Oscar Pettiford played the walking bassline, and then how Paul played it… There were different choices of how to do that.
TP:   Are you speaking of the phrasing?
CL:   The choice of notes, the phrasing, and the types of music the played in the idiom…the context of the type of music they played in at that time.
TP:   Now it’s time to hear some recordings Curtis has played on over the years. We’ll begin with something you did with Betty Carter, with whom so many musicians have really received their polishing-up, so to speak. Her role has been similar to that of Art Blakey, Horace Silver and people like this over the years. I guess her band is where you met John Hicks. How did you come to that gig?
CL:   As I said before, I was playing with some guys who were playing, for lack of a better term, avant-garde and free music. Every chance I’d get in some of those bands, I would swing, and for some reason they seemed to like it. I guess the word got out. At the time, there were more jam sessions and open places for musicians to sit in. So the word got out, and I got a call one day… I was actually down to like my last, and I got a call one day from Jack Whittemore, who at the time was booking everybody. He had a stable of some of the greatest performers in this music. I got a call from Jack, and he said, “Curtis, Betty Carter is looking for a bass player and she’d like to hear you and see if you can play her music.” I was nervous. I went over to her house. John was there, and Kenny Washington was there, and we played a few charts. She took me to the side and said, “there are some things you need to work on, but I kind of like your sound, and I think I might be able to do something with you.”
TP:   What do you think the things were she thought she had to do with you at that point?
CL: Enhance my ability to really understand what it was to play behind a singer – number one. Help me to relax and learn how to enjoy the music. And make me practice.
[MUSIC: Betty Carter, “Tight”—Hicks-Curtis-Kenny, The Audience with BC-1979; 2 from Whatever Happened to Love-Khalid Moss, Curtis, Lewis]
TP:   You’re currently working with Betty Carter. You’re leaving town with her tomorrow, and you’ll be performing Monday in New York at the Pierre Hotel.
CL:   I enjoy every chance I get to work with Betty. It has seemed to work out over the years that once in a while she’s in between bass players, in between discovering some new cat, and she calls me because I think I understand her approach to the music and her concept of what she wants to do – and also the theater that’s involved. There’s a visual aspect. Betty was one of the first people who helped me to understand that the music still had to have drama and theater to it. That’s an important part of how you lean towards playing with her, in note choice and interplay with her.
TP:   We’ll speak a bit less and fit in more music as we wind down to 9 o’clock. We’ll hear more Paul Chambers. This is from Jan. 18, 1959 date by Jackie McLean, one of two sessions that comprise Jackie’s Bag – “Fidel.”
[MUSIC: Jackie McLean-D. Byrd-Sonny Clark-Paul-Philly, “Fidel”-1959; Tina Brooks-Blue Mitchell-Kenny Drew-Paul Chambers-A.T., Back To The Tracks-1960]
CL:   Partly the reason why I chose those two selections is to show Paul’s impeccable time and his sense of harmony in terms of note choice, just to show how… I made the comment before how some bass players play like they’re waiting for their solo. Paul never did that. He shows you how great a rhythm section player he is, and his sense of time is absolutely great. I always respected and admired that about him, just the fact that he was such a virtuoso on the instrument. But he understood, once again, the function. So that was special for me to hear him play like that, not just on those dates, but…
I often tell people, when you look at some of the major recordings of the early 50s going into the 60s, and if they’re classic recordings, a lot of times you look at the lineup, and Paul is playing bass.
TP:   For the last set, the tracks will feature two Florida-born bass players, Sam Jones and George Tucker.
CL:   First of all, George Tucker was a bass player that a lot of people kind of slept on, as far as I’m concerned. The first time I heard him, his sound impressed me and his ability to play great time and be a very supportive accompanist made an impression upon me. Of course, Sam Jones was one of the all-time great bass players as well. I didn’t realize George Tucker was from Florida until… I remember meeting his sister one time, and I asked where he was from, and she told me Palatka. When I was a kid, we used to go through Palatka on some of our church meetings going through Florida. I had the experience knowing one of the oldest men ever in America. I think his name was Pop Crosby. He was 116 years old, and he was from Palatka. So I had a connection with that city.
TP: He was 116 in the early 1960s?
CL:   Yes. He told me stories about slavery and the end of it and all that kind of stuff. He was a very heavy man, and it’s just a coincidence that George Tucker also was from Palatka.
Sam Jones, as I said, was one of the bass players who I had a chance to see when I came to New York. He was such a beautiful and warm person, which I think is a personality trait. A sense of feeling and family that people who come from the Sun have, and they’re able to share that with you.
TP:   a few words about his playing. Sam Jones was an almost universally admired bass player.
CL:   I think that’s because of the warmth that he exuded from the instrument and from his personality as well. He made you feel welcome when you were in his company. He was a beautiful person. I really cherish the times that I was able to be in his company. Of course his playing made me realize that the tradition that I wanted to play in was still alive as well.
TP:   A talented composer as well, and the track we’ll hear is I guess the first of his composition that got some recognition, with many to follow. It’s from the 1960 Cannonball Adderley album, Them Dirty Blues, and it’s called “Del Sasser.”
[MUSIC: Sam Jones-Adderleys-Timmons-Louis Hayes, “Del Sasser”; Stanley Turrentine 5-H. Parlan-G. Tucker-Al Harewood, “Summertime”-1961]
TP:   Apart from working as a busy bassist on the New York scene, you have another career as well, directing a choir.
CL:   The name of the choir is the ARC Gospel Choir, and I was fortunate enough to meet and be influenced musically and otherwise by a man named Mr. James Allen, who is the Executive Director of the Addicts Rehabilitation Center. I came to know him when I was going through a struggle in my life, and he helped me to understand that I could use music and my knowledge of music to be grateful for what the Creator has given me, first of all, but also to help others to see the light towards moving to higher planes of acknowledgment and understanding of how precious life is. Consequently, when he found out some of my musical abilities, he allowed me to start working on arrangements and working on directing the choir. I’ve been fortunate to have that as a kind of focal point for me right now in terms of understanding and working on harmonies and different things like that. So it’s been a blessing for me, and it’s very special.
Working with the choir has helped me to understand what my function can be as a leader also, because it’s a very challenging position to work with these people in particular, who are overcoming substance abuse, and are really getting in tune with themselves again. It’s very special.
[MUSIC: ARC Choir,“Jesus Wash”; Hicks-Curtis-Idris, “Hold It Down”]

Leave a comment

Filed under Curtis Lundy

For the great trombonist Wycliffe Gordon’s 57th birthday, a post with liner notes for four of his Criss Cross albums

 

Notes for Wycliffe Gordon, “The Gospel Truth“:

 

          “I wanted to dispel the myth of a separation between Gospel music and Jazz music,” Wycliffe Gordon states, when asked to summarize his conception for The Gospel Truth, his Criss Cross leader debut.  The recital is a timeless program of rearranged spirituals, hymns and four originals, stamped by the 33-year-old trombonist’s signature bearlike sound.  Deploying an immense lexicon of glisses, slides and mute effects, he carves out intricate runs, postulates clear melodies, hits sweet-note bullseyes throughout the proceedings.

 

          The Waynesboro, Georgia, native internalized the principle that all music is a blessing early on from his parents, serious church people who did not recognize any dichotomy between sacred and secular music.  “My father played piano in church,” Gordon recalls.  “We were in church every Sunday, the whole church service — from the prelude when the music is being played until the deacons come up to give the devotional service, the announcements, the sermon.  He had a great affinity for classical music, but didn’t listen to jazz until later on.  My mother just thinks that music is music, and that good music is good music.  Now, she has music she likes.  It could be Mahalia Jackson, it could be B.B. King or Bobby Blue Bland or…heck, it could be Luther Vandross.”

 

          Lucius Gordon, Sr. gave his son rudimentary piano lessons, but not until the youngster discovered the trombone at age 12 — the family had moved to nearby Augusta — did music become a more attractive proposition than football.  About a year later, Wycliffe heard Louis Armstrong’s “Keyhole Blues.” “It was a time when electronic instruments with buttons and gadgets and fireworks were popular, things that you didn’t really have to learn how to play,” he remarks. “I connected with the music of Louis Armstrong because he sang and played so well and put so much feeling into it, whether it was gospel music or not.” Fascinated with his instrument and determined to become a musician, the young aspirant practiced incessantly, piggybacking on rudimentary lessons in band class.  He began to develop the vocalized approach that’s made him a hit with audiences since he came on the scene with Wynton Marsalis in 1989.

 

          “If that happened,” he cautions, “it was probably instinct. I’d watch people sing in church who had everyone up on their feet, not due to their vocal technique, but for the feeling and what they were singing about.  That feeling was embedded in me.  I wanted to play music as I heard it in my head, and at some point in high school I connected with the idea that you can try to sing through the instrument, use the instrument the way people use their voice.”

 

          Gordon matriculated at Florida A&M, in Tallahassee, Florida, attracted by that institution’s world-famous marching band, which, he soon discovered, overshadowed curricular emphasis on jazz.  “I began to learn to use my air to project a sound through the horn and to play with power,” he says.  “As soon as we got into place during the pregame show, the drum majors would blow the whistle and we’d begin to march at 320 steps a minute.  We called it ‘rattling.’  I think I was in the best shape of my life.”

 

          Gordon’s life changed when Wynton Marsalis came to a jazz band rehearsal on a sojourn to Tallahassee.  “Wynton did an exercise where he soloed and someone was to come up with a riff,” the trombonist relates.  “It wasn’t hard, because I heard it all the time in New Orleans music and coming up in the church.  By the time the first chorus went by, I had harmonized a riff for the trombone section.  I talked with Wynton afterwards, and he put me in touch with Marcus Roberts, who lived in Tallahassee.  The next time we spoke, he told me to learn some Charlie Parker solos, like ‘Parker’s Mood‘, which I did.  Then I didn’t hear from him for a while.  I had almost given up on playing or performing jazz.  I was playing electric bass in a fraternity band and working in a Pizza Hut, which is where Marcus Roberts called me one night (I thought it was one of my partners wanting me to bring some free pizza) to say that Wynton wanted me to join him at Caravan of Dreams, in Fort Worth, Texas.  He was working on the music for The Majesty of The Blues, and tried me out on some things, but I was totally unprepared.  The level of musicality overwhelmed me.  If I knew where the back door was, I’d have gone out and walked back to Tallahassee.”

          Marsalis and Roberts presented Gordon with “three or four pages, front and back, two columns on each side, of records to buy. Whenever I got paid from a job, I went straight to the record store.  I’d been listening to older jazz recordings — my greatest influences were Jack Teagarden or Trummy Young, who had played with Louis Armstrong, or Al Gray with the Count Basie Orchestra and to gospel music, like Mahalia Jackson or Aretha Franklin singing with James Cleveland and the Southern California Choir.  Now I started to listen to Monk and Coltrane, to Charlie Christian, to J.J. Johnson and Curtis Fuller.  I started shedding again; the horn became part of my daily regimen. So when Wynton called me back at the end of 1988 to come to Blues Alley in Washington, I was better prepared. A few months later he called and told me that I had a plane ticket for Charleston, South Carolina — June 6, 1989.  It started as a summer temporary gig, and I’ve been with him ever since.”

 

          In the ensuing years Gordon has traversed the world several times as a member of the Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra and the Wynton Marsalis Septet, playing repertoire ranging from Jelly Roll Morton to Marsalis’ ambitious ’90s work, internalizing the building blocks of jazz from the inside out. “I’ve learned two major things,” he says.  “One is about the desire to achieve greatness in music.  Wynton is always striving to reach that next level musically, and when I got in the band I was at the bottom of the totem pole.  I learned the importance of dealing with the basics and the fundamentals, how they connect to everything you accomplish that’s great in music.

 

          “I’ve learned a lot about life.  I was brought up in the Southern Black Baptist church, and being able to travel and see places and meet people I read about in college history or humanities class opened my mind to the way things actually are in the world.  I learned to deal with different religious and spiritual beliefs, to accept different musical forms and sounds — like the didjiridoo — and utilize them to develop my own way of playing.  When you travel, you discover something that Louis Armstrong knew about everyone in the world — we all have the same needs.  We may all seem or look different, but when it comes down to the bare necessities, we all want the same thing.”

 

          Though Gordon admires his trombone peer group, he remains loyal to the aesthetic of the preboppers who initially inspired him.  “I like Bebop,” he says.  “But a lot of trombonists get caught up in playing with what they consider technique.  They want to play like a saxophone or a trumpet, because that’s what everyone loves.  But when you hear the trombone players from the United House of Prayer, it’s like people singing.  You can’t recreate that.  In God’s Trombones, James Weldon Johnson rendered seven Negro sermons in verse, and how the trombone speaks with a human voice is what he thought about when he heard the preachers preaching.  When I hear Vic Dickenson or Dickie Wells play something that evokes an emotion, it sounds human.  The great and beautiful thing about jazz is that the instrument is meant to be an extension of you.”

 

          Gordon’s colleagues on The Gospel Truth, none yet 40, know how to make their instruments sing.  Multi-reed and woodwind master Victor Goines, a New Orleanian, Gordon’s close colleague and friend from LCJO, appeared on Slidin’ Home, the trombonist’s 1999 Nagel-Heyer release; Gordon reciprocated on Goines’ clarinet extravaganza, To Those We Love So Dearly.  “Victor has the ability to adapt,” Gordon notes.  “You can play Gospel or Funk or Bebop or any period of jazz, and he’ll fit right in.”

 

          LCJO trumpeter Marcus Printup recorded four ’90s albums for Blue Note.  “Marcus is from Georgia, and he grew up in the Southern Baptist Church, too,” Gordon says.  “He can do the flashy appoggiaturas and other classical music techniques that jazz musicians use in their solos.  But when he’s playing what he really wants, he’s trying to sing through his trumpet.

 

          “Eric Reed’s father was a preacher, a pastor, a minister, and Eric grew up playing in the church. I didn’t want just to play jazz versions of hymns and spirituals.  I wanted someone who could actually play that style, who knows the difference between a hymn, a work song and a gospel tune. He’s another one who can play from any period, he can pull from different sources, and I needed that flexibility for this project.”

 

          Reuben Rogers spent five years with Nicholas Payton and currently works with Joshua Redman.  Gordon says: “I don’t know much about Reuben’s background, but he’s a great bassist and he got the feel of the music quickly.”

 

          He continues: “Winard Harper grew up playing drums in the church.  He also has great flexibility, an ability to bebop you or play different church grooves; before he came to New York he was playing for gospel choirs.  Winard told me about Carrie Smith, and I met her this March.  She’s from Georgia, too, and she grew up listening to Bessie Smith; she grew up singing in church, but she sings a lot of blues, too.  She has a strong voice, a voice that really carries.  She understands what it sounds like when the Deacon is moaning in the church before or during the devotional service.”

 

          Carrie Smith shows what she knows as she moans the opening section of “And The Deacon Moans” to rubato Eric Reed accompaniment; Gordon, Printup and Goines take up the function with stirring solos once the tune transitions to the sort of 12/8 feel you might expect to hear from a Ray Charles ensemble.  It comes on the heels of the ebullient set-opener, a quartet version of “Jesus Loves Me” that springs from a head arrangement Gordon conceived from scratch in the studio.  “It came together like it happens in church sometimes,” he says.  “Someone starts singing, and you don’t ever know where it’s going to go.”

 

          Gordon conceived “What A Friend We Have In Jesus” as a shout.  “I was thinking of the way a gospel quartet sings something fast, with one person singing lead and the others in the background going ‘Ooh-ooh.'”

 

          Gordon begins his reading of the “Lord’s Prayer” with a tuba solo, using multiphonics to represent the sound of someone singing it in church; Eric Reed enters, “connecting it to the way it’s mostly done at weddings,” and a rhapsodic trombone-piano duo ensues.

 

          Carrie Smith channels Bessie Smith and Louis Armstrong on her showstopping arrangement of “There’s a Tree,” on which the Davis Sisters put their stamp some years back.

 

          Gordon composed “The Gospel Truth” for the Wynton Marsalis Septet in 1993, though the band only rehearsed it. It’s a groove piece on which all hands solo; Gordon’s tag at the end “is like what happens when people are leaving the church, or after announcements, or after the collection when the musicians continue playing until the reverend gets up to speak or the next thing happens.”

 

          The trombonist displays his vocal chops on “Hallelujah Scat.”  “I wanted to draw a parallel between people speaking in tongues in church and when jazz musicians scat sing,” Gordon reveals, citing Armstrong and Jon Hendricks as exemplars of the idiom.  Harper gets the crisp quality of a tap dancer on his imaginative solo.

 

          Thomas Dorsey’s “Precious Lord” is “a hymn I heard in church that always brought tears to my eyes,” says Gordon, who responds to Smith’s impassioned declamation with searing trombone testimony. 

 

          Eric Reed contributed the heartfelt arrangement of “We Have Come Into This House.”  Gordon comments: “Often at altar call the whole church will come in and sing, ‘We have come into this house to celebrate his name’ or ‘worship him.’  It can be more powerful than when the choir is singing.”

 

          Gordon concludes the program with “The Message,” an extended conversation between voice and trombone that builds to a final affirmation — “It all belongs to God.”  “We’re always categorizing music,” Gordon explains.  “Now, Bessie Smith was Mahalia Jackson’s model.  Mahalia was not going to sing any blues because of her religious beliefs.  If you take the words away, they’re singing the same music.  You can call music what you want.  But all the music DOES belong to God.”

 

*****************

Notes for Wycliffe Gordon, “United Soul Experience“:

 

            During an eleven-year run with the Wynton Marsalis Septet and the Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra that ended in July 2000, trombonist Wycliffe Gordon established a considerable reputation as an idiomatic interpreter of a full timeline of jazz styles. Given the opportunity in LCJO to play the canonic music of the keystone composers of jazz from the inside-out, so to speak, he developed a relationship to their vocabularies that is both functional and poetic. The tropes of Gordon’s narrative encompass raw tailgate vocalizations from early-century New Orleans brass bands, the capacious tonal palette of Ellingtonia, the instrumental virtuosity of J.J. Johnson and Frank Rosolino, even the multiphonic innovations of German pioneer Albert Mangelsdorff, but his sound is consistently identifiable as his, every note imbued with his own character. It’s a sound that denotes a scientist’s command of timbral possibility, conjuring sonic images more akin to pre-bop bonemen than modernist descendants who focused on rapid articulation and smoothed out the rough edges.

 

            “I think a lot of jazz musicians consider me a trombonist who plays in an earlier style,” says Gordon, who recently turned 35, and will begin to teach full-time at Julliard School of Music in Fall 2002. “But I don’t want to be limited to a style or period or idiom, and I’ve been finding platforms to do other things I’ve always wanted to do. Playing with Wynton was a very rich experience; I was in contact with great musicians, great composers and great people. But I felt it was time to test the waters. The situation helped me to grow, mostly by example. There was always something to strive for, and the musicians were inspirational. You’re out on the road, and after the gig you’d talk about music, eat and work out together, celebrate one another’s birthdays or if one of the cats had children or got married. We saw each other more than we saw our families. On our best nights, the band would play on a level so high that our feet didn’t touch the ground, and only we would know it.”

 

            On previous recordings as a leader, Gordon surrounded himself primarily with LCJO peer-groupers who share his penchant for navigating the tropes of blues and the black church, and whose idiosyncracies and predispositions he knows intimately by dint of nightly bandstand proximity over a decade. On United Soul Experience the circumstances are completely different. Here, at the suggestion of producer Gerry Teekens, Gordon encounters four individualistic improvisers whom he had never met until a three-hour day-before-the-session rehearsal. The title is apropos; the musicians transcend differences in sensibility, background and custom to create music that bespeaks the cohesion and empathy you’d expect to hear from a unit of long-standing.

 

            “Soul is soul,” Gordon says. “I’m pleasantly surprised and pleased with the outcome; it was an eye-opening experience. These guys are able to negotiate jazz music the way they hear it. They are consummate professionals, play with taste, and are extremely musical. Before this I thought they played kind of out, but in reality they have something different to bring to the tradition. For instance, when Seamus Blake plays the tenor saxophone, he’s not limited to the tenor range, but often moves into the altissimo register. He plays what he wants, and his voice speaks. People play better with that kind of freedom. What those cats did is what jazz is about.

 

            “Gerry wanted me to record with musicians I hadn’t played with before, and do something that isn’t limited to bebop or to swing, but puts all those things together.  Maybe these guys play this way all the time, but because I’ve mostly concentrated on earlier forms of jazz on my own projects and with the big band (even though I’ve played some bebop), it hasn’t been an area of concentration for me.”

 

            The program comprises five Gordon originals, two by Blake, and an obscure Duke Ellington song. Here are Gordon’s comments:

 

            “‘Get It! Get It!’ is like the changes to ‘So What’ or ‘Impressions,’ but instead of going up a half-step, it goes down a half-step.  I thought of it the night before the recording session, and decided to play around thematically with the shift from half-time to double-time.  It features the masterful drumming of Bill Stewart between the breaks. 

 

            “I recorded ‘Every Day’ in 1995 on my two-trombone album [Atlantic] with Ron Westray. It’s in 3/4 with a couple of 4/4 bars. Sometimes I get into these pensive moods.  I don’t want to be categorized as someone who just likes slow music, but sometimes at the slower tempos — for lack of a better word — you can see your thoughts a little more clearly.  When I’m writing these melodies, I’m thinking about songs that I don’t have words for yet.

 

            “‘Karen’s Contemplation’ is in a 6/4 groove.  When I was writing it, I sat down at the piano and just played what was on my mind at the time. It took a couple of times, because the form — which is AB — is long. My working title was ‘Wishing Well,’ but after I sat down and listened to it, I thought of the one of my three sisters I’m closest to. She’s very contemplative and reflective about things going on in the world. It starts with the piano solo, because that is Karen’s instrument.  Dave Kikoski gives a great rendition.

 

            “I wrote ‘Corey’s Competition’ in 1993-94, while I was with the Wynton Marsalis Septet. Corey is my oldest son, he was labeled as being autistic, and this is a blues about his struggle with that. My working title was ‘a fast 3’ because, depending on how you want to feel it or count it, it’s in 3 or 4 or 6. The trombone solo represents, I guess, Corey recognizing his issue.  He’s 14, and now he’s in a regular school, and has overcome that obstacle in his life.

 

            “I wrote ‘On The Spot’ in college. It’s a blues, and I told the guys to give me a groove with a dance element, but I was thinking more along the lines of a New Orleans groove than what Bill came in doing. But what he came up with was right on the money.

 

            “I liked playing both of Seamus’ tunes, although they were challenging to play on trombone; musicians often write something that lays nicely on their instrument or on the piano, and don’t consider the physical difficulties of playing them on an instrument like the trombone. I like the challenge, though. ‘In Flight’ has a nice groove, with a thing that will make you want to move or dance, while I love the melody and harmonic flow of  ‘Periwinkle’.”

 

            As is the case on many Criss-Cross sessions, United Soul Experience ends with a duo, an impassioned dialogue between Gordon and bassist Larry Grenadier on Duke Ellington’s “Low Key Lightly” from the score of Anatomy of A Murder, Gordon conjuring a great nasal sound, starting his notes with soft breaths, swelling to uplifting crescendos.

 

            “I was shocked when Larry Grenadier mentioned that song,” Gordon says. “But you never want to judge a book by its cover, and you don’t want to judge a musician by their cover. We used the very first take. Later I played that song open-horn, but it didn’t have the same vibe.”

 

            What’s remarkable about Gordon’s playing throughout United Soul Experience is how he sustains his trombonistic conception through situations that require him to extend the instrument’s range.

 

            “A lot of trombonists get caught up in playing with what they consider technique,” he said two years ago in the liner notes to The Gospel Truth [Criss-1192]. “They want to play like a saxophone or a trumpet, because that’s what everyone loves.  But when you hear the trombone players from the United House of Prayer, it’s like people singing. You can’t recreate that.  In ‘God’s Trombones,’ James Weldon Johnson rendered seven Negro sermons in verse, and how the trombone speaks with a human voice is what he thought about when he heard the preachers preaching. When I hear Vic Dickenson or Dickie Wells play something that evokes an emotion, it sounds human. The great and beautiful thing about jazz is that the instrument is meant to be an extension of you. So I think it’s a compliment to say I’m playing extremely trombonistic. I want it to sound more like a voice than an instrument.”

 

***************

Wycliffe Gordon (Liner Notes, Boss Bones):

 

It’s a complex proposition for 21st century jazz musicians to address in an idiomatic manner the various standards, show tunes, and various blues connotations that Wycliffe Gordon performs on his seventh Criss-Cross date. As Gordon puts it, “Normally I’d say, ‘Why would I do something when it’s been done this way already?’” But for this project, on which Gordon pairs off with one-time Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra section-mate Andre Hayward, the 40-year-old trombonist eschews odd-meters, metric modulation, harmonic deconstruction, and a host of other strategies that are commonplace on so many of today’s jazz recordings and live performances, and denotes his individuality with straight-up melodic inflection, ebullient swing,  and a tone that uncannily emulates the feeling of the human voice.

 

            “Playing the head, solo, and then the head out on a ballad is a pretty old format,” Gordon remarks. “But when something’s great, you might just need to play the melody, and that’s it. I saw J.J. Johnson do that once near the end of his life, when he played at the Blue Note opposite Jon Hendricks. He closed the set with an encore, but instead of doing something rip-roaring, which most people would do, he played ‘Goodbye.’ All he played was the melody, one time, with no inflections, and walked off the stage. All the trombone players who weren’t working that night were at that show, and their jaws were on the table, like, ‘What did you just do?’ You felt like you’d been violated—in a good way.”

 

            This don’t-reinvent-the-wheel-every-time sensibility comes through in Gordon’s treatment of Horace Silver’s “Nica’s Dream” and Joe Henderson’s “Recorda-Me,” both composed during the ‘50s heyday of “hard bop,” and two of the most beloved—and oft-played—compositions in the jazz lexicon.

 

            “The original arrangements were so great that it made no sense to revise them from the original recordings,” Gordon said. “Of course, our solos are different, and so is the vibe of the rhythm section. On ‘Nica’s Dream’ we did the same hits and the same shout chorus; on ‘Recorda-Me,’ we used the same introduction and the same backgrounds. When you play those tunes, not only are you doing a standard, but the arrangement itself becomes part of your standard.”

 

            It goes without saying that only musicians who know the vocabulary of the jazz lifeblood  so thoroughly as to be able to play with complete freedom in any style can make a project like this work. Consider the combined c.v. of the rhythm section, each member a New York A-lister of long standing.

 

            Himself a leader of five CDs on Criss-Cross, pianist Mike LeDonne’s launched his career with consequential gigs with Benny Goodman and Panama Francis’ Savoy Sultans, as well as a stint as house pianist at the legendary mainstream haunt Jimmy Ryan’s, followed by fifteen years as Milt Jackson’s musical director, and ongoing work with Benny Golson. Bassist John Webber, who does not play an out-of-context beat and whose tone bespeaks the jazz essence, has worked with a pan-generational cohort of swingers, from Von Freeman to Eric Alexander. Presently most visible as the drummer with the Bill Charlap Trio, drummer Kenny Washington, whose sessionography would occupy a book, and whose encyclopedic knowledge of jazz history operates hand-in-glove with his extraordinary command of the drumset, burnished his skills early on engagements with the likes of Betty Carter, Johnny Griffin, and Tommy Flanagan.

 

            Both Gordon and Hayward developed bona fides as masters of the timeline while in the employ of the Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra, where they met during the 1999-2000 season, when Hayward joined. “I came to jazz through the earlier periods, and although Andre plays those styles, he’s most comfortable with the bebop language,” Gordon states. “I love his playing. He has a nice sound and tone, and there’s a singing quality to his playing. During rehearsals or breaks, we’d imitate different soul singers, and Andre was great at getting their idiosyncracies with his voice and emulating them on the trombone. He has the lyricism of a singer and also the technique of a great bop musician, which is a combination that makes great listening.

 

            “One great thing about the Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra is that you’re playing in a section, so it’s all about matching the articulation and phrasing of the lead trombone player, as opposed to working on a particular style or method of articulation in defining your solo approach to the instrument. After Andre left LCJO, he had the time and freedom with different organizations to further develop his solo chops and become more expressive, and he was able to incorporate the things he had developed through all this section playing. That came through while we were recording—he was quick to match my articulation when we played phrases together, or vice-versa when I had him play the melody on the top.”

 

            During his LCJO decade Gordon evolved from a promising, charismatic raw talent into an artist who deserves to be mentioned in any conversation about the occupants of the trombone pantheon. As I wrote in the notes for United Soul Experience [Criss 1224], his tonal personality “encompasses raw tailgate vocalizations from early century New Orleans brass bands, the capacious tonal palette of Ellingtonia, the instrumental facility of J.J. Johnson and Frank Rosolino, even the multiphonic innovations of German pioneer Albert Mangelsdorff, but his sound is consistently identifiable as his, every note imbued with its own character.”

 

            That sound hearkens to such pre-bop bonemen as Jack Teagarden and Trummy Young, Gordon’s heroes on the instrument when Wynton Marsalis recruited him in 1989. “Around 1991, it became clear that if I was going to create a niche, it would be best for me to learn all of the languages,” Gordon says of his evolution. “It took some time to get into that, because I liked the earlier styles. But I began to grow. I was impressed with what Curtis Fuller,  Frank Rosolino and Bill Watrous were able to do technically, and although it wasn’t necessarily what I considered trombonish at the time, it was being done on the trombone, so I had to move beyond the limitations that I indirectly placed on myself in terms of what the trombone’s capabilities were, and I worked on methodologies that would help me to develop the technique to articulate what they did in my own playing. I wanted to develop the ability to play anything, so I could function in any situation, whether it’s the music of Louis Armstrong, or bebop, or big band music. I tried to develop those things during the ‘90s, and after I left LCJO was the time to put it to the test.”

 

            Enhancing Gordon’s learning curve during those years was his intense assimilation of the recorded oeuvre of the J.J. Johnson-Kai Winding trombone tandem, his template for this date. “In high school I had a record called Swingin’ Together Again [Impulse],” he says. “I didn’t think that “Swingin’ Together Again” meant that they had been swinging together before, so I just listened to it over and over. Everything was really tasty, and it was my complete and total reference to anything with two trombones that played together. After I joined the Septet, and went to Japan the first time, I went to a record shop and saw eight or nine other CDs with Jay & Kai. I bought all of them. Later in New York, I saw two or three more in Tower Records. I got everything. Then I got bitten by the bug, and bought everything with trombone that I could find. I had to stay out of Tower Records, because I was spending my paycheck, but I wanted the information badly.”

 

            Repertoire like this speaks for itself, but there are several points of note. Hayward shows how well he sings through his horn on “Stardust,” while the leader, inspired by Nancy Wilson’s rendition, makes “Here’s That Rainy Day” his own. There are two original Gordon blues: “Spop,” a medium-up quasi-riff blues of the Ellington-Mingus variety, takes its title from Hayward’s onomatopoetic emulation of the sound of Kenny Washington’s rim-shot in the beginning of the fifth bar of the melody; “Another Slow One,” spurred by Washington’s expert camelwalk tempo and featuring Gordon-Hayward exchanges, means exactly what it says.

 

            Both bonemen and LeDonne eat up a gauntlet of changes and a tricky asymmetrical structure (it’s an AABA form with 10 bars on the second and last A sections) on Gordon’s “The Nick of Time,” the final movement of a three-part suite that he composed on commission.

 

            Dizzy Gillespie gets props both on “Wheatleigh Hall,” another blues, taken at a brisker tempo than on the Gillespie’s 1957 recording with Sonny Rollins that brought it into common parlance, and on “Anthropology,” an ur-bebop Rhythm variant that Gillespie and Charlie Parker were playing at at breakneck speed as early as 1945. On the latter, propelled by Washington, an old hand at lightning tempos, Gordon and Hayward get a one-voice sound on the unisons, and solo with panache.

 

            All in all, Gordon is pleased with the results of the latest entry in his burgeoning discography. “There may be the ‘jazz police’ who say, ‘That’s not original; these pieces were already recorded this way,’” he says. “But we intended to do that. And I think it came off well.”

**************

Wycliffe Gordon, The Intimate Ellington: Ballads & Blues (Liner Notes):

 

“When you play jazz, it’s hard not to play, in some way, shape or form, music by Duke Ellington and Billy Strayhorn,” says Wycliffe Gordon, who has done so more than most, particularly during his long-haul affiliation with the Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra and the Wynton Marsalis Septet, but also in numerous other endeavors. Which makes it surprising that the 45-year-old trombone master’s ninth leader date for Criss-Cross is his first all-Ellingtonia recital.

 

            Once Criss Cross head Gerry Teekens suggested the subject, Gordon, who considered the proposition a no-brainer, decided to hone in on a cohort of blues tunes and ballads by Ellington and Strayhorn—some iconic, some less-traveled—that he likes to play. For the occasion, he recruited an ace quintet of post-Boomers, augmented by singer Dee Daniels and, also, at Teekens’ suggestion, violin virtuoso Zach Brock.

                                                                             

            “Gerry sent me Zach’s record, and I thought I’d use him for a tune or two,” Gordon says, referring to the Brock’s 2012 Criss Cross swinger, Almost Never Was. “But he came in and took care of business, and ended up playing on more than half the record. I thought of how Duke used Ray Nance’s violin within the group in Anatomy of a Murder, and found different ways to use Zach’s voice.”

 

            Towards this end, Gordon relied on the flexibility of Adrian Cunningham—a recent New York arrival out of Sydney, Australia, with whom he frequently shares the bandstand—on tenor and soprano saxophones and clarinet. “Adrian knows the early music, the big band style, and the modern stuff,” Gordon says.

 

            Similarly malleable across the timeline is pianist Aaron Diehl, 26, a Harlem resident by way of Columbus, Ohio, whence Wynton Marsalis plucked him for a summer tour after he graduated high school, before matriculating at Juilliard. Throughout the proceedings, Diehl reveals himself a mature, individualistic thinker, incorporating into his own argot elements from the styles of Willie the Lion Smith, James P. Johnson, and Art Tatum, from John Lewis and Ahmad Jamal, and from McCoy Tyner and Herbie Hancock.

 

            Bassist Yasushi Nakamura, 28, a Tokyo native and Juilliard graduate, is, Gordon enthuses, “a quiet guy who doesn’t mind digging in or swinging or grooving; every time on the bandstand, he’s going to try to get the most he can out of the music.”

 

            Closer to Gordon in age is drummer Alvin Atkinson, who shares with Gordon and Diehl deep musical roots in ceremonial African-American church. In the manner of such Ellington drummers as Sam Woodyard, Butch Ballard, and Rufus Jones, Atkinson articulates a broad, feel-good beat across a range of grooves.

 

            Given a day to rehearse and coalesce the repertoire, Gordon emulated Ellington’s penchant for arranging on the fly, confident that all members would be sufficiently familiar with the language to give him freedom to follow his instincts in organizing the raw materials, which he blends with the deftness of a skilled cook who reaches into the refrigerator, grabs a little of this, a little of that, and conjures up a first-class meal.

 

            “I sent a list of tunes that I planned to pull from,” he says. “We discussed the keys, and I arranged it so that everything wasn’t head-solo-head. I knew that even if we didn’t get something right the first time, stylistically everyone would be able to lock in.”

 

            That Gordon was able to make the moving parts mesh so synchronously speaks to his own intimacy with the intricacies of Ellington’s canon. The relationship began in earnest in 1989, when he joined the Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra, placing him, over the years, in direct proximity to such Ellington alumni trombonists as Britt Woodman, Chuck Connors, and Buster Cooper.

 

            “Sitting next to Britt taught me things you can’t put on paper,” Gordon says. “On a break one day, he was noodling a Charleston, dotted quarter note to the eighth. I could play that rhythm all day long. But it was how he played it that gave me so much insight to the secrets of those great big band sounds—the inflections that musicians play with to create a certain sound and vibe. A lot of those guys learned by playing with each other, not necessarily in school. We have yet to be able to come up with the pedagogy that can describe those sounds. That was an education that I couldn’t get in school, and I never forgot it.

 

            “When I first joined the band, Buster Cooper would fly up from Florida for concerts, so I got to hear his voice, which was different than Britt, who was very lyrical. When I was learning the plunger, Art Baron—who was the best-known plunger specialist among  New York trombone circles, and could play closest to the language of Tricky Sam Nanton—was in the band. Art made recordings for me, and we’d listen to Tricky Sam, Tyree Glenn, Booty Wood, and Al Grey. I’d try to emulate their styles, as well as Lawrence Brown and Juan Tizol, but of course, try to put my own thing in there. I bought all the Ellington records I could, checking out not just the trombonists, but also Ray Nance, or the different plunger concepts of Bubber Miley and Cootie Williams. I’d incorporate different things musicians do in their playing, and mix it up.”

 

            During the ‘90s, Gordon adds, “Wynton was trying to incorporate Ellington’s methods of orchestration and arrangement, which I learned a lot from. On the bus, I’d sit next to David Berger, who’d show me things from Ellington’s scores.” Over the phone, he sings the refrain of Ellington’s 1946 blues, “Rockabye River.” “It’s nothing rhythmically complicated, just quarter notes and  eighth notes, but the band swung it in a way that separates the grownups from the children. Or ‘Harlem Air Shaft.’ Not a lot of notes, but when you look at the score, you’ll learn about how Duke orchestrated. He used the foundations of what jazz really is—call-and-response, riffs, breaks in the music. You get lots of information in a little bit of time. I learned so much just by listening, but when you actually see the music written down, it hits another part of the brain.”

 

            Such are the lessons that Gordon applies to this wonderfully varied recital, in which he addresses the question, as it he puts it, “How can you arrange Duke better than Duke?” with humility and a keen sense of the sounds available to him. On Ellington’s “Pie Eye’s Blues,” a Clark Terry feature from the 1959 album Blues In Orbit, Atkinson sets up a chugging shuffle to “start the session off with that good feeling—it’s a blues with breaks in the melody, then you start playing and creating the music.” Gordon sets the mood with an ebullient, alligatory, cohesive blues shout; Cunningham channels Harold Ashby with a tenor solo that ascends from a whisper to a holler; Diehl concertizes, sustaining a trill as he elucidates a funky left-hand line before morphing into his refraction of New York stride; Brock fiddles a rollicking declamation.

 

            Titled for Johnny Hodges’ cognomen, “Jeep’s Blues” first emerged on a 1938 septet session with Hodges, on soprano, sharing solo duties with Cootie Williams, Harry Carney, and Lawrence Brown, and reappeared in 1956, when Ellington transformed it into a concerto for Hodges—on alto—at the Newport Jazz Festival. “It’s a simple blues, but a masterpiece, another example of Duke’s genius,” says Gordon, recalling “how good it felt” to hear Norris Turney play “Jeep’s Blues” with the LCJO.  “I decided just to let cats play.” Over a bright, funky beat, Gordon opens the solos with a two-minute sermon in notes and tones; Cunningham offers cogent, enspirited testimony on soprano; Diehl constructs a spare, virtuosic, John Lewis meets Earl Hines statement.

 

            Singer Dee Daniels applies her dynamic personality to “I Got It Bad,” composed by Ellington for the ill-starred 1941 revue Jump For Joy and recorded that year as a torch vehicle for Ivie Anderson, signified upon with one plangent chorus by Johnny Hodges on alto. Here Gordon’s understated, upper register solo, which closely hews to the melody, contrasts nicely with the raw emotion projected by Daniels, who requested the classic. “I’ve always loved the song,” Gordon says. “I used things that I can do on the trombone to say it my own way without embellishing too much.”

 

            Daniels and Gordon harmonize on Lorraine Feather’s poignant lyric for “Creole Love Call” (Cleo Laine recorded it with Mercer Ellington in 1994), which, in its original 1927 incarnation, featured a wordless vocal by Adelaide Hall, as it did in Ellington’s 1944 remake with Kay Davis. Over a medium-slow swing beat, Brock uncorks an unbearably soulful solo, Gordon scats as only he can, Diehl addresses the blues drama with Ellingtonian flair.

 

            Named for Ellington’s nephew, drummer Steve Ellington, “Stevie” debuted on Duke Ellington Meets John Coltrane, from 1962. “It’s the only minor blues on the record,” says Gordon, who played the modal tune with the Wynton Marsalis Septet. All hands—Cunningham on soprano saxophone, then Gordon, Diehl, Atkinson, Brock, and Nakamura—solo with brio.

 

            Ellington first recorded Billy Strayhorn’s “The Intimacy of The Blues” on a March 1967 small group session with Cat Anderson, two months before Strayhorn’s death, and with the orchestra on the posthumous November 1967 Strayhorn tribute, And His Mother Called Him Bill. Over the restrained walking tempo, Cunningham builds a clarinet solo that has the feeling of foreplay, Gordon constructs a cohesive solo from the trombone’s onomatopoeic possibilities, Nakamura says a lot with a little.

 

            For Strayhorn’s “Lotus Blossom,” Gordon—performing the classic ballad for the first time—assigns Diehl a reflective solo intro, mirroring Ellington’s solo coda to his Strayhorn valedictory LP, And His Mother Called Him Bill. There follows a trombone-piano duo passage, augmented by Nakamura’s arco bass, then a violin-piano duo passage, then all four recapitulate the theme.

 

            Gordon first played “Something Sexual” under its alternate title “Dual Highway”—which Ellington recorded on a 1960 septet session that was not released until 1979, on Unknown Album—in the Wynton Marsalis Septet. “It’s what I would call the REAL smooth jazz,” Gordon jokes, noting that it’s easy to imagine the line in the hands of a master practitioner of boudoir tenor saxophone. In keeping with the theme, Cunningham’s clarinet solo is insinuating, Brock’s violin solo is impassioned, and Gordon’s plunger trumpet solo embodies the dirty blues.

 

            After a rubato statement of the eternal theme of “Sophisticated Lady” in duo with Aaron Diehl, the rhythm section enters on the bridge to join first Gordon and then Diehl for statements on which they place their magnificent chops at the service of melodic development, while also matching the sensibility of the song’s protagonist.

 

            Gordon concludes the proceedings with an extemporaneous, all-hands-on-deck exploration of “Caravan.” “I didn’t write an arrangement and we didn’t rehearse it,” he says. I gave a solo order. Everything else was created in the studio.” Following his performance practice, Gordon conjures an atmosphere on the didjiridoo, Atkinson plays a drum cadenza, and the blowing commences. Cunningham swings hard on tenor; Diehl creates another Ellington-John Lewis refraction that it’s hard to imagine another contemporary pianist even thinking of, much less executing; Brock grooves with exotic textures and scales; the leader utters explosive, vocalized trombone lines in an Afrocentric duo with Atkinson; the ensemble coheres on the theme, engaging in New Orleans-style polyphony, before the final decrescendo ends the master class.

 

            If further elaboration that Gordon is a key figure in the trombone timeline were needed, which it isn’t, The Intimate Ellington, on which he applies his wit and imagination to a subject he’s pondered for close to a quarter-century, will suffice.

Leave a comment

Filed under Criss Cross Records, Trombone, Wycliffe Gordon