Tuesday, January 20, 2026

The EU Grudgingly Wants Total Control to Keep the Bloody Peasants From Unleashing War

The European fanboys (and girls) sure do think a lot of themselves. How convenient.

Image

America would regret Europe without the European Union

“Be careful what you wish for, lest it come true,” Aesop’s fable goes.

And any American cheering alongside the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, calling for the dismantling of the EU on the grounds that it’s a bureaucratic Moloch guilty of “civilizational erasure,” should take that lesson seriously. ...

In reality, divorced from the European project, the continent would resemble something akin to the Western Balkans following the former Yugoslavia’s disintegration: A place where all old grievances suddenly spring back to life. And that would be especially true if the EU’s imagined dissolution were to take place at the hands of the NATO movement’s supposed allies — the so-called “patriotic” forces in European politics. 

LOL. Yeah, I'll totally risk that

It's fun that the author uses post-Yugoslavia ethnic conflict as a defense of the EU. Really? The EU has to suppress democracy to force the people not to kill each other? 

To Hell with the EU. With power its hatred of America will be free to treat America as an enemy to that control. NATO is the solution for trans-Atlantic security. Do not bend the knee to Brussels.

And please Britain, do not reconsider Brexit

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!  

NOTE: I made the image with Bing.

Monday, January 19, 2026

The Winter War of 2022 Tracks the Life of a Tsar

Is Russia's use of intermediate-range ballistic missiles against Ukraine the flashy expansion of a dying red tsar before contracting to a white dwarf? 

Image

The war goes on. The big recent new thing was Russia's addition of a big, expensive ballistic missile for one of its nightly barrages to hit western Ukraine:

The intense barrage and the launching of the nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile came days after Ukraine and its allies reported major progress toward agreeing on how to defend the country from further Moscow aggression if a peace deal is struck to end Russia’s almost 4-year-old invasion. 

European moves (with America seemingly an associated power rather than Allied power in this initiative) to stabilize Ukraine after the Winter War of 2022 ends seem to assume the post-war stabilization issue is no longer one that Russia can veto. That's a whole lot of interesting:

There is a story that has been going around about a physicist, a chemist, and an economist who were stranded on a desert island with no implements and a can of food. The physicist and the chemist each devised an ingenious mechanism for getting the can open; the economist merely said, "Assume we have a can opener"!

Economists can only look on in awe at these diplomats. What intelligence do the diplomats have on Russia's ability to wage war that makes them think that when push comes to shove Russia will have to go along with a ceasefire? I'm hoping that they know things that I can only suspect and hope for.*

On the other side, the Red Juggernaut that Moscow is presenting isn't persuading some Russians:

Russian milbloggers continue to loudly reject the alternate battlefield reality that Russian President Vladimir Putin and senior Russian military commanders are trying to create.  

Yeah, an alternate battlefield reality seems about right. 

Still, it seems that we can assume a can opener for the purpose of moving discussions forward. What's it going to do, make Russia mad?

But something has to open the can to get at the post-war stabilization part of this war.

And then we might get the answer to my big question

UPDATE (Monday): Russia ramps up its efforts to freeze Ukrainian civilians, including threats to power stations that support Ukraine's nuclear energy generation

*Well, to be precise, things I hope exist and that Russia recognizes the crisis in time to avoid catastrophic disintegration. 

NOTE: ISW updates continue here

NOTE: Also, I put war-related links and commentary in the Weekend Data Dump on Substack. You may read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved

NOTE: GIF from NASA

Sunday, January 18, 2026

Weekend Data Dump

Image

I'm trying out duplicating the Weekend Data Dump on Substack.

Help me out by subscribing and by liking and sharing posts. I also post here on TDR seven days a week, including Weekend Data Dump and Winter War of 2022. I occasionally post short data dump-type items on my Substack "Notes" section

In case you missed it on Substack: When You Lose a War, a Lot of Details Look Bad in Retrospect

In case you missed it on Substack: Globalize the Intifida? Focus the Punishment

In case you missed it on Substack: The 2025 National Security Strategy (final thoughts and table of contents)

In case you missed it on Substack: Which Empire in Europe Will Bite the Dust?

Venezuela is dragging its feet on releasing political prisoner. Why?. A virtual occupation is difficult. Fear will subside as the Great Raid fades from memory. Fear must be reinforced constantly.

Well: “A U-Haul driver allegedly plowed into a massive crowd of protesters at an anti-Iran regime rally in Los Angeles on Sunday — injuring at least two people in a chaotic scene caught on video.” Later I read the driver was pro-MEK who are communists who oppose the mullahs and the anti-mullah protesters.

Yeah, I assumed Iranians on the streets are getting professional help from abroad. That help doesn’t make the opposition fake. It just tips the balance away from the state with all its instruments of power. Hell, I don’t assume it has to be state-provided support. Tip to Instapundit.

You only need sufficient signal to support a revolution--not the volume needed to televise it in real time. Tip to Instapundit.

In the Caribbean Sea, America captured a fifth sanctioned Venezuelan tanker.

Homeland defense: “The U.S. Coast Guard closed out 2025 with record success in maritime drug interdictions, seizing more than 511,000 pounds of narcotics valued at more than $3.8 billion, the service announced in a news release.”

The M1E3 Abrams is being displayed at the Detroit Auto Show, which began on Wednesday.

F-35 pilots will be able to control several large CCA “wingmen” drones using tablets.

America and South Korea established a joint ground forces command as part of a long-held goal of transferring responsibility for fighting a war from America to the South Koreans.

We will likely know what was decided by the time this is published: “President Trump is scheduled to be briefed Tuesday on options to respond to the protests in Iran, according to U.S. officials[.]” And maybe before if this is a ruse.

The U.S. apparently used a sonic weapon during mission to capture Maduro. To be clear, this is a less-than-lethal weapon designed to reduce deaths while protecting American forces. Do we have an airborne area effects weapon now?

This reduces one avenue for Iran to strike Israel: “Following an evacuation warning to Lebanese civilians, the IDF confirmed that it had begun striking Hezbollah infrastructure in “several areas” of southern Lebanon on Sunday evening.”

This year, Finland will start receiving the 64 F-35s it purchased. It is not the most expensive plane on a per-plane basis. It is the most expensive total purchase price for all planes produced.

F-22 updates will keep it flying into the 2060s.

America doesn’t win its wars. I emphatically disagree, other than Afghanistan which we chose to lose: “It is also necessary to consider the point spread our military uniquely operates under in non-great power wars. And don’t forget the big picture context!

Ukraine’s effort to build its own long-range cruise missile.

An economic cold war. The national security strategy wants economic rather than military competition. Hopefully China sees mutual benefit to a purely economic competition. Good luck with that.

Spheres of influence are good? I reject that false solution to great power competition.

Is Cuba next? Well sure, it is more vulnerable to collapse without Venezuelan oil. And the fall of that hostile regime would be good for America. But China and to a lesser extent Russia could assume the financial burden of sustaining Cuba if having a Caribbean outpost is important enough to them.

Is this a revolution in Iran? Hard to say. The mullahs could ride out the surge of opposition as they have in the past. But I also ask whether a threat to the mullah regime if it pans out that way is a revolution or the fragmentation of the rump Persian Empire that we call Iran today.

Good: “Germany is planning to set up a joint Nato operation in the Arctic in an effort to dissuade Donald Trump from annexing Greenland.”

Venezuela isn’t free yet. That is the problem with a virtual invasion.

Huh: Northern and Southern Commands will become American Command, or AMERICOM; the European, Central, and African Commands will become International Command, and Indo-Pacific Command will not be changed. No Polar Command?

I have no problem with this path, as described, to getting illegal aliens legalized.

The proto-imperial EU can hardly strip away the prefix without an army! “European Union Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius has said the bloc should consider establishing a standing military force of 100,000 troops and overhaul the political processes governing defense.” Resist this danger to America.

Wow: “Venezuela’s much-touted antiaircraft systems were essentially not connected when U.S. forces entered the skies over Venezuela’s capital, and they may not have been working for years, former officials and analysts said.” Well, you don’t have to be great to win--just better than the enemy.

Perhaps my nervousness about the Artemis II path back to the Moon that I expressed last week is not justified.

Huh: “The Trump administration is nearing a trade deal with Taiwan to reduce its tariff rate to 15% and commit Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (2330.TW) , opens new tato building at least five more facilities in Arizona, the New York Times reported on Monday[.]” Who needs an Article 5 guarantee?

Trump was briefed: “Long-range missile strikes remain an option for a potential US intervention, but Pentagon officials have also presented cyber operations and psychological campaign responses, the sources said.” Non-kinetics are great. But people being shot need to see those murdering them killed, too.

Remember that the Cape of Good Hope route is the alternative to a blocked Red Sea route: “Warships from China, Russia and Iran amassed in the waters off South Africa to kick off a weeklong drill alongside the South African National Defense Force.”

Senator Kelly sued the Pentagon for reducing his rank and pension for his despicable “obey illegal orders” video. While I don’t think Kelly as a sitting U.S. senator should be restricted, the solution is for someone in elected office is to resign their commission and forfeit their military pension to escape the UCMJ.

I’m opposed to “perfidy” in war--usually practiced by unlawful combatants--but I’ve expressed my opposition to regular military assets disguised as civilians. But if the US plane not painted like a military plane that hit a drug boat had military insignia on it, was it really a violation of the rules of war?

Does this mean all the SFAB units will be eliminated? “The Army has formally inactivated the Security Force Assistance Command based in North Carolina, eliminating the headquarters that for years oversaw brigades tasked with advising foreign militaries.”

Ukraine is using vehicle-mounted Hellfire anti-tank missiles in an anti-UAV role.

Drone air defense: “Sweden has allocated €1.4 billion ($1.6 billion) to establish multiple dispersed air defense units equipped with short-range air defense weapons to guard cities and critical infrastructure against aerial threats.” A “new” threat requires an old priority.

Is refusal a reflection of confidence in Mexican capabilities or fear of cartel power? “President Claudia Sheinbaum said Monday she rejected an offer from President Trump to use the U.S. military against the country’s drug cartels[.]”

Sh*t got real: “The United States virtual embassy in Iran urged American nationals to ‘leave Iran now,’ citing protests that are ‘escalating and may turn violent.’”

Is Iraq moving toward the strong horse by inviting American oil companies to operate there “finally mark a decisive shift in Iraq’s geopolitical stance back towards the U.S. and its Western partners, away from Russia, China, Iran, and their allies?”

China is buying more Russian oil as India reduces its purchases. When America relied on Persian Gulf oil, it established the Rapid Deployment Force. Which evolved into CENTCOM. How will China react to relying more on Russian oil exports in order to reduce its vulnerability to a stoppage?

Iran has crossed America’s red line: “Hundreds of protesters have been killed by security forces in what may be the largest − and possibly most consequential − wave of protests in Iran since 2009, human rights groups say.”

I assume the hope is that this will be brief because the mullahs will feel more pressure and flee: “President Donald Trump said on Monday that countries that do business with Iran will face a new 25% tariff.”

Lock and load: “The Army’s updated solicitation signals a clear intent to expand domestic ammunition manufacturing capacity and secure a stable second source for key calibers used across U.S. forces.”

The U.S. should avoid “nation building” in Venezuela. Sure. But distinguish “nation building” from “state building.” Trying to make tribal Afghanistan or Somalia actual nations of unified people is folly. But a friendly government is necessary to prevent chaos and the trouble that can breed there.

From the journal of the echelon above reality’s conventional wisdom: “The Iranian Regime Could Fall But a U.S. Strike Would Prop It Up”. I reject that rally around the flag argument. Note that seven months ago America bombed Iran’s nuclear facilities. Iranians are burning and not rallying around the mullah flag.

Russians have noticed Russia’s multiple foreign policy failures: “’An entire era is coming to an end,’ wrote a pro-war military blogger under the pen name Maxim Kalashnikov on Sunday, reflecting growing criticism of the Russian leadership.” Indeed, I’ve noted the end of the Russian Decline Era already.

Canada is not hedging its broad and deep relationship with America by reaching out to China. Anybody who thinks that is possible--or wise--is delusional.

I’ve been resisting being hopeful about the chances of overthrowing the mullahs in Iran. My resistance is weakening.

I heard the son of the former Shah calling on Iranians to wage cyber-war on the mullah regime. I assume that at least partially runs cover for Western (including Israeli) cyber operations.

North Korea doubles down worse relations with America and South Korea, while embracing nukes. Can China really be happy with North Korea as a loose nuclear cannon on the deck of U.S.-China relations? But perhaps North Korea and Russia have decided to resist domination by China.

Someone on Substack wrote that small UAVs force infantry into trenches, tunnels, and other cover. This is true. Until it isn’t. Consider the World War I Western Front. Infantry was forced underground to avoid fires. But during the war, weapons, equipment, and tactics emerged that made World War II different.

I’m sure Trump would be happy with only this: “Greenland’s government said on Monday it will increase efforts to ensure the defence of the Arctic territory takes place under the auspices of NATO[.]” The threats to take Greenland are for achieving this.

Whether victorious or crushed, the Iranian people are staging a revolution: “When they say ‘Death to Khamenei,’ they have crossed that threshold and entered this new era of both hope and tragedy.” Well, maybe a dissolution. But it is definitely a death match with the mullahs.

My glimmer of hope for Iran has faded. I have said it depends on whether the mullahs have security forces ready to kill. The mullahs have that: “The Iranian regime is using an unprecedented level of brutality to suppress protests.” Can America effectively help? There are limits to aerial firepower and cyber war.

The Iraq War continues as “the United States will not engage with any prime minister or appointee to the Foreign Affairs Ministry, Defense Ministry, Interior Ministry, Counterterrorism Service, National Intelligence Service, or Iraqi Army Chief of Staff who has ties to Iranian-backed Iraqi militias[.]”

The Islamist Syrian government began a limited offensive against Syrian Democratic Forces west of the Euphrates River.

Havana Syndrome still unexplained even as the Pentagon investigates a potential device. If I had to guess--and I neither have to nor have any knowledge to bolster the guess--this is either a listening device or trying to impose a pattern on random afflictions. Okay, two guesses.

Speeding to disaster? “The U.S. Army will field the long-anticipated Bell MV-75 tiltrotor aircraft this year ahead of its former schedule[.]” I’m skeptical of the deep penetration mission of the aircraft formerly known as the V-280. I’ll make an exception for small, well-planned special forces missions.

Ah, two SFABs will be retained: “The 1st SFAB, regionally aligned to U.S. Southern Command, will stay at Fort Benning, Georgia, while the 5th SFAB, which is aligned to U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, is set to stay at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington[.]”

To the shores of the Senkaku Islands: “The Marine Corps’ only permanently deployed expeditionary brigade stood up a new headquarters company on Tuesday, aligning it with a Japanese amphibious brigade to streamline joint humanitarian and warfighting missions in the Indo-Pacific.”

I’m skeptical you can avoid collateral damage--the only reason to defend this way--by netting an attack drone. If the drone falls to the ground and detonates anyway, was the target really defended?

China only wants to lull India for a future snatch and grab mission: “Top leaders in India and China want to maintain the peace along their border and are working to bridge a trust deficit between the militaries of the two countries[.]”

America struck jihadis in Nigeria in cooperation with Nigeria: “The US delivered critical military equipment to Nigeria, reinforcing security cooperation with Africa’s most populous nation as it seeks to curb terrorism, banditry and kidnappings that have destabilized large parts of the country.”

As I’ve long said, Trump isn’t pro-Russian. He’s been trying to calm a rabid pit bull. Russia will pay a price: “The United States accused Russia on Monday of a ‘dangerous and inexplicable escalation[.]’”

I once swore to defend against foreign and domestic enemies. Activists ignorant of rule of law and what Nazism is have edged from protest into low-level insurrection pushed by politicians and media. Those inspiring activism got a woman killed and will get more killed. For God’s sake, stop. Via Instapundit.

This is long overdue: “The Trump administration on Tuesday labeled Muslim Brotherhood branches in Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt as terrorist organizations.” Via Instapundit.

Sh*t got real: the U.S. is withdrawing excess personnel from bases near Iran.

The decision to make the next Navy destroyers have guns and vertical launch cells rather than include hypersonic missiles led to the decision to build a battleship. I’m skeptical the BBG will be more than a CG.

Marine Force Design still insists it can wage combined arms warfare without the tanks, artillery, and other supporting assets the Marines ditched for missiles and drones. I’m skeptical.

I sure hope killing enemies and breaking their stuff doesn’t get lost in the ether: “Information operations, cognitive operations, and cyber operations as a ‘salient form of warfare’ are ‘meta trends’ that are reshaping modern conflict, [the INDOPACOM commander] said.”

Yeah, the willingness and ability of the mullahs to kill Iranians has sapped my brief moment of hope. Is there a level of outside help that can change the calculation? And if so, are America and our allies willing to provide it in time to do any good?

The EU fanboys have latched on to the Greenland kerfuffle as the latest faux crisis to justify a powerful EU that makes European nations mere provinces in the empire. Don’t give the EU power--or an army.

That model of mediocrity, Antony Blinken, says America is abandoning the world to dominate the Western Hemisphere. No, I think America focuses on repairing the Western Hemisphere as the foundation of power projection to support allies abroad who take the lead. There are problems with that, I admit.

Russia denies harassing Germany with small drones; and Germany pretends to investigate the problem.

Russia loses money for each jet it sells to China. But no worries! They’ll make up for that with volume of sales.

The mirage of spheres of influence: “the economic costs of imperialism, the lack of coercive capacity to hold territory, and the inevitable overlap of ‘backyards’ will lead not to orderly dominance, but to global chaos, instability, and endless warfare that will ultimately backfire on the instigators.” Heartily endorsed.

I’ve been skeptical about Iran’s regular army having a role in defeating the mullahs after nearly 50 years of mullah rule to shape their leadership. But I’m hearing they are still, in part, an option to get non-mullah rule. Hmm.

Trump’s threats to take Greenland to protect American security are directed at--with good reason--China and Russia, and not Denmark. And I wonder if our NATO allies are in on the sham threat against Denmark to make America’s threat to stop China and Russia more credible. Or maybe they’re just that skittish.

The effort to activate the War Powers Resolution over Venezuela failed in the Senate. I just want to note that in 2011 when America attacked Libya for months, the Obama administration argued the resolution didn’t apply because Libya wasn’t shooting back at America’s aircraft.

Minnesota is edging into insurrection with state and local officials inciting resistance to proper federal law enforcement. The incitement has led to an ambush of an ICE officer. There wouldn’t be “chaos” if local authorities turned over criminal aliens. False patriotism anti-Nazism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

Top-attack mine: “A smart anti-tank munition that helps soldiers hold their own against tracked vehicles is being hurried to the force after successful testing in Bavaria.”

Promoting Europe’s defense industry: “The European Union said Ukraine must buy weapons and military platforms from European manufacturers under a new €90 billion ($104.8 billion) loan, unless they aren’t able to supply what Kyiv needs.”

Japan and the Philippines signed a defense agreement on logistics for joint military exercises and disaster response.

America’s military interest in Greenland has been active since 1941.

Not to be cruel, but you know America isn’t actually going to capture Greenland from Denmark when Macron warns America not to invade. This is just performance art for the next job Macron wants--Emperor of Europe.

Mowing the grass: “In 2025 the UN continued to maintain a peacekeeping force in Somalia. U.S. drones and warplanes continue to attack Islamic terrorist operations in various areas of Somalia. Islamic terrorist group Al Shabab continues to be active. Piracy returned to waters off the Somali coast.”

The Navy selected a new LST design.

This CLIP proposal sounds like my external magazine USV concept for “reloading” Navy warship VLS cells while in the fight.

The Army wants South Korea to develop a longer range 155mm cannon using a 58 caliber barrel for use on a wheeled vehicle.

These authors defend the aircraft carrier and claim Ukraine lessons for the Navy are apples and oranges comparisons. I agree with that. But defending the role of carriers in recent power projection missions to defend carriers is an apples and oranges issue for the carrier sea control mission.

Is it just me wondering this, but won’t traditional anti-tank shells and missiles just punch through those elaborate anti-drone screens being mounted on armored vehicles?

Replacing the Stinger anti-aircraft missile.

War is fundamentally a human endeavor. Your perfect strategy could fail because commanders get tired. Given the filters that already stand between your precisely calibrated diplomatic signal and the enemy leader that already make things dangerous in a crisis, enemy leaders get tired when interpreting that signal.

Well sure, America is in an economic war with China. The national security strategy was pretty clear about have that instead of a hot or “just” a cold war. But I find the 5,000-year old civilization knowledge claim rather silly. Their people live no longer than our people in a 250-year-old country.

I have no idea if the Iranian revolution (or counter-revolution if you refuse to accept 47 years of status quo) will succeed. But if it fails, will this crisis cripple Iran’s ability to attract jihadi fanboys abroad?

Is China a military or economic superpower? I have that book to read. I agree we over-estimate China’s military power (so far). Yet China only has to be able to project dominant power 500 miles from its borders to inflict global damage. As for the Cold War? The USSR was about 100 miles from the Rhine.

Sounds about right: “The regime will likely succeed in quelling this resistance if it can retain the loyalty of security forces and prevent those who are resisting the regime from acquiring the wherewithal to challenge the regime’s ability and willingness to sustain its crackdown.”

The elites of the mullah regime in Iran are moving gold and wiring money abroad in a sign that the possibility of the fall of the government is not negligible. My instinct is to strike when opportunity arises. But maybe time (and quiet moves) will work instead of missiles. Tip to Instapundit.

A Chinese line in the orbit? Tip to Instapundit.

Mission accomplished: “Troops from several European countries, including France, Germany, Norway and Sweden, are arriving in Greenland to help boost the Arctic island’s security[.]” Come for “stopping” Trump. Stay for actually stopping China!

Is China prying Thailand away from its long alliance with America? Hmmm. We’ve been allies a long time. I keep reading warnings but don’t know if they are realistic or extrapolations from Chinese desires to a future reality.

I almost get tired of advising people to just breathe when I see Europeans leaping on chairs in panic over every White House utterance: “Denmark, Greenland and the U.S. agreed to form a high-level working group ‘to explore if we can find a common way forward’” per the Danish foreign minister.

The united West is “dead”, say the EU fanboys. Another faux crisis to justify the proto-imperial EU ambition of erasing the prefix. If a united West does die, Brussels will be the one pulling the trigger.

Good: ““The Department of War is returning Stars & Stripes to its original mission: reporting for our warfighters,” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell wrote on X.” Maybe the editors of Early Bird Brief sponsored by Lockheed Martin could follow that example.

Huh: “One largely overlooked anti-Tehran foreign policy change cemented by Washington was a new trade agreement negotiated by the Trump administration between Azerbaijan and Armenia that’s putting a major economic squeeze on Tehran.”

I assume she will have a role: “Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado gave her Nobel Peace Prize medal to U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday during a White House meeting, in a bid to influence his efforts to shape her country’s political future.” Eventually.

This may be a good idea before we have a Blackhawk Down 2.0 in Minneapolis: “President Donald Trump threatened to deploy US military forces to Minnesota in order to quell protests in response to violent encounters involving federal immigration agents.”

The Golden Hour probably isn’t possible on a conventional battlefield: “The Army is testing the ability of its combat medics to keep critically injured soldiers alive on the future battlefield, where they no longer will be able to rely on quick medical evacuations.”

Shiny object: “The Pentagon on Thursday said it is moving a carrier strike group from the South China Sea toward the Middle East as tensions between the U.S. and Iran continue to rise.” If one or two of our SSGNs are in the region, CENTCOM could act before the Abraham Lincoln group arrives.

INDOPACOM ([sigh] not PAINCOM) commander: “When we operate with allies and partners, we multiply capability and we raise the threshold for aggression.” America has a big role in maintaining those allies and partners. So I commend Congressional interest.

Giving the cartels paid time off until the heat cools off isn’t “dismantled”: “The Venezuelan government said it dismantled the country’s main drug trafficking logistics routes during 2025, particularly in the western state of Zulia.”

Russia reorganizes its army from brigade-based to small divisions. Of note, the new motor rifle divisions have two mechanized regiments and one tank battalion. Cold War MRDs had three mechanized regiments and a tank regiment for maneuver units. I wonder if the naval infantry division is a potential mistake.

Iran resorts to cyber-war on Israel. Will this work out better than trading aerial bombardments?

We should be able to build them like Liberty ships: The Navy wants to build new frigates with modules built in other areas assembled in the shipyard. Crewing them is another issue, of course.

The U.S. awarded a contract for “base operating support services” on Diego Garcia. The British government faces unexpected obstacle to giving away Diego Garcia. Fingers crossed.

Peak protest, regrouping, waiting for America--or lack of visibility? “Iran’s deadly crackdown appears to have broadly quelled protests for now, according to a rights group and residents, as state media reported more arrests on Friday in the shadow of repeated U.S. threats to intervene if the killing continues.”

Is Trump trying “regime reorientation” rather than “regime change” in Iran? I don’t think you can get “tame” Islamist governments. I’m not sure it can be done in Venezuela.

Targets in Iran that America could hit. Don’t know if Iranian people and military can take advantage of that. But given Iran’s repeated attacks on America I don’t feel like we would be “escalating” the long war waged since the mullahs took our embassy in Tehran at the regime’s birth.

China’s record export surge may be BS. Relying on statistics from underlings eager to please--and fearful of disappointing--might have just crashed the CCP reporting system. Tip to Instapundit.

ISW says the Iranians have suppressed demonstrations for now--but that the maximum security mobilization is not sustainable.

His lips are moving: “Putin claimed on January 15 that Russia’s war in Ukraine is a ‘direct response’ to the West ignoring Russia’s interests by expanding NATO, despite alleged public promises to Russia not to do so.” So you know he is lying.

Is this insufficient? “The 1951 Defense of Greenland agreement granted the U.S. the right to expand its military presence in Greenland far beyond World War II levels.” While I suppose it might be nice to own Greenland if Denmark agrees, can’t this be amended? Or is the issue getting NATO to help defend it?

Sh*t got ... real? “Britain said on Thursday it would strengthen its military reserve forces by raising the maximum age at which former personnel could be called up by a decade to 65.” What kind of fight them on the beaches, streets, landing grounds, fields, and hills situation is expected?

Or ... getting the element of surprise: “President Trump is delaying a decision on striking Iran as the White House consults internally and with allies about the timing for such an operation and whether it would meaningfully destabilize the regime[.]”

I had briefly toyed with the idea of going to the Detroit Auto Show to see the new Abrams on display, but decided it wouldn’t be worth it. Cars honestly don’t thrill me so that is all I would be interested in. I figured someone would go to it--sure enough! Tip to Instapundit.

While America has had a long interest in keeping Europe out of enemy hands, this is a good question: “Why do 600 million Europeans insist they need the help of 326 million Americans to deal with 144 million Russians?” And also, too many Moslem migrants who hate Europeans.

Breaking ice for fun and illegal profit.

This is a good point. And in the past I’ve asked if excessive ship rust is separate from ship and crew readiness for combat; or a visible warning sign that the ship and crew are not ready for combat.

When the war in Ukraine ends, Ukrainian mercenaries with their skill sets could be an export much in demand. Hopefully if Russia continues to loom over Ukraine after a ceasefire, too many don’t seek fortunes abroad. But it could get ... interesting.

Good question: “War, diplomacy, or revolt: What comes next in Iran?” With Iran’s mullahs, if we choose diplomacy remember the quip that diplomacy is all about saying “nice doggie” to a snarling dog while reaching for a stick. With sanctions and luck, time may be the stick that brings down the mullahs.

I’ve been arguing this for a while: “The West should stop buying into Moscow’s bluff that Russia is invincible[.]” Indeed, I have a post on that coming up tomorrow on the TDR mothership.

Yes: “The death of U.S. primacy has been greatly exaggerated.” As I argued in my final essay on the 2025 American national security strategy, America is willing to use its power--but not precisely the way our allies would like America to use its power.

Since 2021: “Germany is already deeply entrenched in state censorship and attacks on free speech.” Gosh, what was Vance smoking, eh?

Iran’s mullahs aren’t putting out the Mission Accomplished banner yet.

Huh: “Insufficient infrastructure investments in Russia’s Far East are likely hurting Russian economic agreements with the People’s Republic of China (PRC).” Opportunity knocks.

Iran has called in its foreign Arab militias to kill Iranians: “Citing a source in Iraq, US broadcaster CNN reported on Thursday that in recent weeks almost 5,000 fighters from various militant groups travelled to neighbouring Iran to support the state authorities.”

Taiwan’s opposition parties again blocked a defense appropriations bill. To be fair, there is a backlog of purchases from America yet to be delivered. Still, I worry about Taiwan’s resolve to fight.

Zheng He weeps with envy: “The PRC led military exercises with Iran, Russia, South Africa, and the United Arab Emirates from January 9 to 16.”

Not sure what the angle is for securing Greenland for defense, including the Golden Shield, but this seems excessive: “President Donald Trump on Saturday vowed to implement a wave of increasing tariffs on European allies ​until the United States is allowed to buy Greenland[.]” But the EU wants a crisis.

It was not fully done. And Ukraine found alternatives: “A year ago, Russia persuaded China to stop selling Ukraine drones or drone components. The Chinese government said it would be done.”

Make it so: “American political and military leaders want to modify the way the industrial base of defense manufacturers and military planners work together. This will be done by improving flexibility, elasticity, and surge capacity.”

Good: “European countries appear to be cracking down against oil tankers associated with the shadow fleets of Russia and its allies.”

NOTE: I had second thoughts on simply moving Weekend Data Dump to Substack when I realized I rely on searching TDR for old stuff and that I'd lose a lot of sources by splitting them. So I will duplicate the posts on Substack. 

Saturday, January 17, 2026

Airfields of Dreams: Build Them and China Won't Come?

The United States is working on reviving old World War II bases in the Pacific in case China decides to wage a war at sea. It's about time! Hopefully not too late.

Image

Huzzah:

Across sleepy and remote islands in the Pacific, U.S. military engineers are working around the clock to revive strategically important airstrips that American troops first built under fire over 70 years ago during World War II.

The reconstruction effort is being led by a designated office within the U.S. Air Force, whose Agile Combat Employment, or ACE, doctrine has identified dozens of airfields that will be used to house and launch fighter jets, aerial refuelling tankers and weapons during a war with China. A trilateral force of the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force is now converging with a single goal in mind: re-establish a presence on the airfields once used to deliver decisive combat power for the United States during the last great power war.

I have been worried about our lack of bases in case of war for a long time

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!  

NOTE: Photo of North Field on Tinian Island from the article.

Friday, January 16, 2026

2nd Multi-Domain Task Force Sheds its Camouflage

The United States Army in Europe gets a Multi-Domain Task Force (MDTF).

Image

Back in October, 10th Mountain Division was given the job to administer a MDTF while it is in the United States

The U.S. Army this fall activated an artillery battalion in New York that is intended to give commanders in Europe new options for long-range strikes and deterrence. ...

Though administratively tied to the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum in New York, the new unit falls under the operational control of the 2nd Multi-Domain Task Force, part of the 56th Multi-Domain Command-Europe.

That's a land-centric theater. So ... huh:

I’ve long suspected that the Army is building long-range fires because it has lost the trust it built up during the war on Islamist terror in Air Force willingness to support Army troops in combat. The Army understands the Air Force has little commitment to prioritizing Army needs for deep strikes. Marketing Army long-range fires as a key component for defeating anti-access/areas denial (A2/AD) capabilities of enemies such as China is a budgetary survival mechanism.

Not that the MDTF can't strike A2/AD assets. It can. Like in Kaliningrad. Still, mission accomplished

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!  

NOTE: Map from AUSA.

Thursday, January 15, 2026

Testing Russian Paranoia in the Arctic Sea

Britain seeks a bigger naval role in the North Atlantic. Outstanding. But ...

Image

Britain wants to defend the North Atlantic from Russian intrusion:

Atlantic Bastion was outlined in the Strategic Defence Review (SDR) as the Royal Navy’s ‘plan to secure the North Atlantic’ – primarily against underwater threats. The use of the word ‘Bastion’ harks to Soviet and subsequent Russian concepts, where defence of a Barents Sea Bastion is vital to defence of Russia and its strategic nuclear forces, and provides a safe haven for conventional strike platforms to threaten adversaries from.

In the coming decades, deterrence in the ‘Wider North’ will be decided by this ‘Battle of the Bastions’.Considering this, this two-part Memorandum aims to explore why the Barents Sea Bastion matters to the Kremlin, why the Atlantic Bastion matters to the UK, and why a more forward model of Atlantic Bastion is best suited to Britain’s needs, rather than a more defensive approach centred on defending the Atlantic at the Greenland-Iceland-UK (GIUK) gap. 

Holding the G-I-UK Gap back in the Cold War conceded Soviet control of lines of communication to NATO Norway. Today, Sweden and Finland are in the game. And Russia's fleet and land-based air power that can poke their noses south are much weaker. So yes, a more forward defense at sea is possible and needed.

I appreciate the mention of the Russian bastion, however. Given how damned paranoid the Russians are, I want them feeling nice and nuclear deterrent cozy warm in their Barents Sea SSBN bastion

Tip to Matthew Palmer

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!  

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

China Plays With the Lego Blocks for a CVE

Is this a potential auxiliary cruiser design or experimenting with layouts prior to building actual escort carriers (CVEs) based on their real world testing?

Image

China is experimenting how to set up a cargo ship equipped with a catapult to launch drones:

As for the catapult setup, we see four vehicles connected in a ‘train’ to create the catapult track, with a ‘ready to launch’ drone mounted atop the rear one and another sitting on the deck behind it. This is exactly the same configuration we saw on the dock in previous pictures, aside from the addition of the fourth catapult vehicle, although satellite images showed the fourth sitting nearby but not connected to the catapult train while pier-side. As we discussed in our previous piece, the length of the catapult could be presumably tailored to the aircraft types being launched and dimensional constraints of the launch area, creating a highly adaptable and mobile catapult launch system. 

New weapon. Old concept I've long advocated.  

Cheap CVEs might be the future of sea-based aviation

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!  

NOTE: The illustration is the "concept" of the layout plucked by the article from the "Chinese internet".

Tuesday, January 13, 2026

The Arctic Wants To Kill You and Break Your Stuff

Fighting in the Arctic isn't just winter warfare with an exclamation point. The Arctic is trying to kill you and trying to destroy what you need to live and fight. 

Image

The Arctic is tough to survive in let alone fight for

In the global race to control the Arctic, the challenge isn't just geopolitical – it's technological. As governments plan for the possibility of conflict in the planet's coldest terrain, they are discovering that even their most advanced weapons and tools falter under the region's punishing conditions.

Do read it all. I mean, I've been aware that I'm unaware of a lot of the details for my general appreciation for the difficulties. But good Lord ...

This is why I want POLARCOM. America and its allies need to collaborate on the means to survive in and control Arctic territory.

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!  

NOTE: Photo from the article.