2026-01-16

You're so vain you probably think this post is about you

.

BUT FIRST, what’s the deal with Substack comments? I have comments turned on, but you can’t leave comments. Here I thought you were all just quiet people when, in fact, I wasn’t letting you tell me what movies you want to watch. Which is quite the bummer.

Fiddling around with that movie post, I got it so you can leave comments now (please do!) but I couldn’t get them turned on on another post where I wanted to leave a post (which is how I realized this is STILL happening even though I’ve fixed it over and over; why is this not happening on other Substacks?).

Anyway, the thing I wanted to say about that other post is that I was wrong. It wasn’t Helmut Newton who said that thing about payphones. It was a guy named Timothy Greenfield-Sanders. And this is the photograph:

Image

(If you click on the photo, you can see the issue of American Photo it came from. I was right that it was no later than 1998 but my assumption that it was exactly 1998 was off by five years. You can see Helmut Newton’s photo there (his wife eating breakfast with her breasts out) and, um, a bunch more of “the world’s finest photographers...selecting the images they made that, they feel, provide the best answer” to the question “What is erotic?”

In case you’re wondering, they did not all choose telephones.

I found this issue quite by accident. I selected songs from our collection that had the word city in the title, one of which was Vertical Horizon’s “Life in the City” (which I didn’t know we owned and which sounds way different from how I think Vertical Horizon sounds). Anyway, curious if Vertical Horizon was still around in 2026, I looked them up on Wikipedia then I got curious if their albums all looked similar (kinda) which led to me learning the name of the photographer of their most famous album cover which led me to her Wikipedia page where I learned she made all those famous Betty Page photos once of which is what you’ll see first if you click on that sexy photo above. You’ll have to scroll down from there for the Newton or the phone-photo page. Anyway, how wild to see that photo for the first time in almost thirty years—accidentally!—just a week after I spent almost an hour looking for it.

But back to the comments, I’m going to try something different WHILE POSTING this lil essay thing and see if that doesn’t get the comments a-working. Please go to Thubstack and say Polo if it works. Thanks.

Marco!

Anyway, on to the post promised by the title...:

.

I was recently “doxxed” by an old acquaintance in the comments to an old blogpost. Scarequotes because anyone who reads this blog and doesn’t know my legal name and place of employment probably doesn’t care. I’m hardly hidden. As an exercise, I encourage you to uncover my middle initial right now and put your time in the comments. My guess is no one will take longer than ten minutes and most people will clock in around two. (This guess is partially based on the assumption that my readers are old enough [ie, not Gens Z or α] to know how to find things on the internet.)

Anyway, the doxxer in question is a narcissist and probable sociopath. Deeply charming upon first meeting, I grant you, but he was forced to leave our shared environment because, after three years, literally everyone refused to associate with him. He called that a victory and went on to greater things.

I don’t know what he’s up to now (I have chosen to do no research) but I always assumed he would soon be wealthy, boldly living life at the edge of white-collar crime. But, if he’s reading old posts of mine and identifying himself in anecdotes, maybe things aren’t going so well? Or perhaps this is normal behavior for narcissists / probable sociopaths. I mean, I wasn’t that surprised he popped up. Perhaps, when bored at home, such people look for old enemies to rage against.

But it’s hilarious (-ly narcissistic) to consider me an enemy. You might need to be a sociopath to interpret our past that way.

Anyway. Carly Simon.


 

Whenever I heard this song as a kid I would get apoplectic and demand of my mother well isn’t it? ISN’T this song about him???

I mean…isn’t it?


2026-01-15

What'll be good in 2026?

.

What’s your most anticipated movie of 2026?

I'm not sure what mine is, but I can tell you that this is most-anticipated-to-watch-with-my-wife and this is most-anticipated-to-watch-with-my-9yrold and this is most-anticipated-science-fiction and this is most-anticipated-superhero and this is my most-anticipated-sequel and this is my most-anticipated-period-piece and this is my most-anticipated-movie-sorta-based-on-a-book-I-often-teach and this is my most-anticipated-bicentenniel-tie-in and this is my most-anticipated-auteur-entry and this is my most anticipated horror and this is my most-anticipated-short-film and this is my most-anticipated-IP-resurrection, but, the truth is, I haven't really looked to see what's coming out yet, so I may be missing the most exciting possibilities.

But mine’s probably this one—




2026-01-06

Is this my favorite genre of music?

.

I had a revelation last fall.

In the spring I’d listened to a handful of YouTuber’s talk about why Jim Croce’s “Operator” has some of the best lyrics in rock/pop history, analyzing the one-sided conversation and the narrator opens his heart to the operator he’s asking to place a call.

(There are tons of them and I watched at least three, but this is the only one I could find in my history.)

Then, over the course of about a day, I heard two of the other four songs below. And I realized

holy crap

maybe I just really really love songs that are half of a telephone conversation?

Because I love all these songs and they are all one half of a telephone conversation.

Let’s discuss them all briefly, shall we? By order of original release.

✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆

Jim Croce: “Operator (That’s Not the Way It Feels)”August 1972


Even as a kid, I had a thing for lost-love songs. A plaintive voice bemoaning the love who left without closing the door never to be seen again or bumping into someone with whom things can never be the same (still a year-end must for me) or, more realistically for wee me, a love that never happened in the first place.

Anyway, of these, Jim Croce’s “Operator” is one of the best, and its point of view—of a man talking to an unseen stranger through his longing for a lost path—allows him to work through the various stages of loss until he arrives at something like peace. It’s a resolution (if not quite a redemption).

But the key moment in the song is when the narrator says, “You can keep the dime”—rhymed with time and kind—he recognizes the kindness and catharsis he’s received from someone who owed him nothing. He’s released. He doesn’t need to make that call. He’s already made the call that mattered.

Two humans meeting and finding each other—anonymously, never to speak again—and yet having a connection, a shared meaning, within one, single, human moment. It’s wonderful.

✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆

England Dan & John Ford Coley: “I’d Really Love to See You Tonight”May 1976


One thing writing this will do is reveal how, from a very early age, I was primed for heartbreak and lost love. Now here I am almost halfway through a century and I still haven’t had a single breakup and yet these songs still speak loudly to me. Let’s blame the human allegiance to metaphor, shall we?

Anyway, here we are. They’ve broken up. This time he gets her on the phone and…what does he say?

For a long time, I’ve assumed he’s saying, “I’m not talkin’ ‘bout the live-in,” ie, he’s not suggesting the get back together permanently, that he move his stuff in. Online lyrics sites are split between “I’m not talkin’ ‘bout movin’ in” (which he’s definitely not saying) and “I’m not talkin’ ‘bout the linen.” The latter one sounds the most right of the three and it could be a fun play on words with the next line (“And I don’t want to change your life”), so I think I’m going with it.

Regardless, he misses her. And while he says he’s only calling because “there’s a warm wind blowing and the stars are out” you and I both know that what he really wants is a chance to believe she might still love him ever so slightly—and that that flame might rise again if only, you know, she’d “take a drive along the beach / Or stay at home and watch TV / You see, it really doesn't matter much to me.”

I know, buddy. I know.

✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆

Lionel Richie: “Hello”February 1982


Brace yourselves:

This song isn’t actually taking place over the phone.

It’s taking place entirely within the narrator’s mind. This is unrequited love. (In the official video, he’s a drama professor in love with a blind student. I’m assuming professional ethics are what keep him from approaching her directly?)

But in my mind, it does take place over the phone. Perhaps he’s leaving a message on her phone. (Answering machines were almost a hundred years old but didn’t really catch on for another two years…so maybe?)

More likely, he’s holding the phone in his hand. His other hand is maybe holding down the receiver or possibly he’s listening to the dial tone and the song ends when it gifts up and starts blaring at him and he’s forced to admit to himself that he’s not dialing that number.

Not today, anyway.

So yes, he’s on the phone, but no one is on the line.

It’s very sad.

And I am revealing a lot about young Theric today, aren’t I?

✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆

Stevie Wonder: “I Just Called to Say I Love You“August 1984


If you ever pick up a copy of Rolling Stone you’ll know that Stevie Wonder is a) one of the least sentimental most hardcore musicians who has ever lived and b) this song is the most saccharine piece of bubblegum ever inflicted on the American public.

Okay, Rolling Stone.

Anyway, he’s some kind of songsmith. This is an easy song to pull out of the ol’ internal jukebox and it works for almost every day. It the “Very Merry Unbirthday“ of holiday songs!

It’s also the first (and last) song on this list that’s genuinely happy. This narrator’s in a good place, lovewise. Here’s the opening:

No New Year's Day to celebrate
No chocolate-covered candy hearts to give away
No first of spring, no song to sing
In fact, here's just another ordinary day

But how wonderful when your ordinary is utterly infused with a lifetime love.

I just called to say I love you.

If you have such a you, make such a call.

✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆
✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆
✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆

And now for a couple honorable mentions.

Nicole Atkins: “The Worst Hangover” — (never released as a single but 2014)


This is perhaps my favorite song (it’s competitive) off one of my favorite albums from the last fifteen years. Which means it’s not filled with childhood nostalgia and angst like the above four, but the real reason it’s only an honorable mention is because I’m not sure the verses are delivered on the phone. The chorus most certainly is. And the “I’m dy-y-y-ing” fadeout at the end is one of my most quoted bits of songery. I sing it, like, literally all the time. And no one knows what I’m quoting because Nicole Atkins has not has a Stevie Wonder–like career. But even so, most critics and fans seem to have written Slow Phaser off as being unlike her other work and therefore less worthy of consideration which is BANANAS because THIS ALBUM IS GREAT.

(Caveat: one song on the album I’ve never listened to because the opening notes prove it an ultimate earworm and . . . I’m nervous having it in my head all the time.)

Nicole, if you’re reading this, I WILL COME TO THE SLOW PHASER ANNIVERSARY TOUR. Don’t miss the Bay Area. Even if it’s just me and you there it will be the best night ever. I can’t wait.

(Unquestionably, this will be the best way for me to hear “Sin Song” for the first time.)

Also, Nicole, if you’re here, is your narrator on the phone the whole time? I think not but cannot say with absolute certainty.

You guys. It’s such a good album.

✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆

Adele: “Hello”October 2015


I’ll also mention this perfectly good song that everyone expects me to mention even though I just like it. It can’t compete with the nostalgic power of the core four and it can’t compete with Nicole Adkins because that’s one of the greatest albums of all time and although you have a beautiful voice and I might respect you, Adele, I might admire your character, but I fear that I shall not be able to give you my undivided attention. Sorry.

subscribe to thubstack

In other phone news I wanted to illustrate this essay with a photo of a payphone receiver hanging off its cord. The photo I have in mind was taken by Helmut Newton and appeared in an edition of I think American Photo circa 1998 (certainly no later than that). The issue was filled with single photos by famous photographers selected by the famous photographers themselves. I’ve never forgotten this photo, mostly because of what Newton said about his photo. He said that nothing is sexier than a telephone. Except a pay telephone.

Anyway, I couldn’t find the photo, but that information should help you interpret this sexy Newton payphone photo if you feel like clicking on it. Warning: sexy Newton payphone photo.

2025-12-31

Decembry Movieing

.

We started the month with Wake Up Dead Man and I'm still not over it.

But we did watch some others as well. Behold!

.

Image
THEATER
Grand Lake Theatre
Wake Up Dead Man (2025)

Excellent movie. One of the smartest direct discussions of faith and truth in a religious context I've seen. The closest comparison I feel I can make is Silence, which is high praise indeed

That and it's a top-notch Rian Johnson–penned-and-helmed mystery as well. The pieces slot together just so and it's very satisfying. And the plot and themes meld together into one great whole.

The first two movies in the Blanc sequence were structured almost identically. Not a knock, but it's appropriate I think that this one played many of the same games but with a new organization and new misdirects and a new reliance on the non-Blanc lead. Father Jud is a terrific creation and one of the best fictional pastors of any stripe I can think of.

Anyway. I loved it. Just wish it would be in theaters longer. I fear that, as with Glass Onion, it'll be gone before I get a second chance and then never exist outside Netflix and piracy.

Ugh. Netflix is the worst.

(One complaint: the mystery of Blanc's new hairdo is NEVER ADDRESSED.)


Image
ELSEWHERE
Public Domain Movies
The Magic Cloak of Oz (1914)

This started life as a five-reeler then was cut down to two two-reelers then put back together into whatever mess this is. And it is a mess. The editing is bad, the use of intertitles is bad, the beginning is a drag, it's redundant and pretty boring. It does pick up when the amazingly comstumed animals take over the movie (and then the Rolly Rogues are fun to watch even though the film doesn't do much with them) and if I were you I'd pick up around the twenty-minute mark then quit when I got bored.



Image
HOME
our dvd
Frankenthumb (2002)

I watched most (all?) of Steve Oedekerk's thumb films when they were pretty new; my fatherinlaw bought them all (or only most of them?) on dvd. I don't have clear memories other than we had fun watching them. I remember Kung Pow! much better. Since showing it to my sons, they all went through a stage where it was their go-to film to show their friends. They've all now seen it vastly more times than I have.

Anyway, I can't remember if I'd even seen any of the Karloff Frankenstein movies when I first say Frankenthumb, so watching it this time I'm particularly impressed by the little sets and the references to the film. I'm definitely enjoying more layers of it this time.

Anyways, it's dumb fun. Even at its short run length it might be a couple minutes too long, but who would complain? Just enjoy it, then leave it alone for twenty years.


Image
ELSEWHERE
our dvd
Pride & Prejudice (2005) × 2

Some movies never stop giving. I watched this twice over the last two days (volume one, volume one, the rest, the rest) and time one was a four kleenex affair, two two a one. But I also noticed or renoticed beautiful moments I've never written about before (eg, the light passing through Elizabeth's eyelids or the carriage carrying her and her aunt and uncle back to Longbourne). I've also seen it enough times to be aware of things that make emotional sense but not sense in the physical world (the camera panning from window to window after Jane's engagement would be impossible on real architecture.

Anyway, for all the reasonable complaints about it, I think it's an excellent adaptation. And some of its changes are in the direction of kindness. For instance, Mr and Mrs Bennet both as individulas and as a couple are treated much more kindly. Mrs Bennet is still ridiculous but she is allowed slightly more roundness and lovely/honest moments with some of her daughters. And their marriage isn't as empty as in the novel. That's nice.

While of course Mr and Mrs Bennet should have begun "to widen and droop," I do feel that were I making an adaptation I would go younger. By my math, Mrs Bennet is certainly in her forties and Mr Bennet may be as well. And although Donald Sutherland is my favorite Mr Bennet and Brenda Blethyn is excellent, I would love to see how a younger dynamic would play out.

Anyway. Adaptation needs to take a stand and this movie does just that. As you can't cram the entirety of such a story into a movie's runtime, some compression and exchange is necessary. I think these choices are entirely defensible.

And the cinematography and score are gorgeous, the acting and settings are terrific, and Elizabeth looks like my wife. I can forgive some impossible bare feet and inappropriate hair styles when you know exactly what to do with screen direction and hands.


Image
HOME
twopeopleexchangingsaliva.com
Two People Exchanging Saliva (2024)

Even though it's less deadly serious and even though its pictures move, what this reminds me of most of all is La Jetée. I don't think just because it's French and narrated and black&white and dystopian, although of course those come into play. I think part of it is the sense of inevitability, but that can't be it. Even from the beginning, that's the reference I had. If someone can explain to me why I was seeing La Jetée from the opening seconds, I will thank them.

Anyway, in this world kissing is a capital offense; to stay safe people have awful oral hygiene and eat bad-smelling foods. The monetary system is based on slaps so the wealthy have awful bruises and the nonwealthy wear makeup to fake their bruises.

This is a may/december unconsummated love story but it's beautiful and captures the sense of denial the characters are suffering through—some more consciously than others.


Image
HOME
myflixerz
Arthur Christmas (2011)

Lady Steed and I came home and the movie was at least half over so I didn't intend to watch it.

But you know what?

It's really good.

(Noting my prior opinion, maybe this is the best way to watch it? I don't think so. I think I would've liked it all the way through. Hopefully there's a next time to check this theory.)


Image
HOME
our dvd
Elf (2003)

I realized this is the only movie that we have watched enough as a family to be a movie we watch as a family.

It's also on this top-100 comedies list I've been thinking about writing about.

It's nice to know, at least, we're not alone in our admiration.

What a lucky break that I won the dvd in a white-elephant event back in 2004!

Incidentally, someone was playing the dvd menu song in class a couple weeks ago and people knew it. I can't think of better evidence of classicdom.


Image
HOME
our dvd
Gremlins (1984)

I forgot how funny this movie is.

It's, like, really funny.









Image
HOME
YouTube
A Christmas Carol Goes Wrong (2017)

I wouldn't call it topnotch Goes Wrong but the chaos of the final minutes might qualify.









Image
HOME
library dvd
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)

Such an interesting case study, comparing the great original to this pretty dumb entertainment.

I first saw this movie shortly after returning from my mission. I remembered very little about it—just the lines in the grass as the raptors hunted and a couple San Diego details. I didn't think it was that great, but who knows—it's been almost thirty years!

But yeah. It doesn't hold up. It's just a heightened version of the first, but it doesn't understand itself. A couple examples. Pete Postlethwaite is one of my favorite actors (Brassed Off! Romeo + Juliet!) but he's just been told to be a morally compromised version of the Aussie hero from Jurassic Park. The boat that comes into San Diego harbor is a clear reference to Dracula but the hows and what's of the onboard slaughter make no sense. It's just a bad slasher movie where people do dumb things so crazy stuff can happen.

But you do get a lot of action sequences etc etc etc so it's fun. You're just left with no reason to ever watch again.


Image
HOME
Prime Video
A Minecraft Movie (2025)

A solid Jared Hess movie and an excellent IP-forward movie.

It was good to rewatch it and experience its strengths and weaknesses from a position of experience. But in the end there's not question that it's a movie with the strength of its convictions. I still can't believe it got made. I have high hopes for the sequel.

What kind of world is it where a Hess has the highest grossing movie of the year?

One I have hope for. That's what kind.


Image
HOME
Prime Video
The Muppet Christmas Carol (1992)

I'm a bit ashamed it took me so long to come around on this film. It's terrific. Gonzo and Rizzo are great. Michael Caine is excellent on every level. And little moments really matter. Like when Beaker gives Scrooge his scarf. What an astonishing moment. Yes, Caine nails his part—but so does Beaker. Whoever thought to make Beaker key to an emotional moment? Astonishing.





Image
HOME
Prime Video
Superman (2025)

I really thought this summer would be the first time I saw a Superman movie in theaters. I did. But travel and more urgent (smaller, likely to disappear movies) prevented it from happening.

For the record, I admire Superman as a character and have read a goodly number of the comics, but I've only seen the first two (maybe three) of the Reeve film and the only time I saw the recent era was watching Justice League and Shazam (he does show up in the cafeteria) but—he wasn't in Flash, right? I can't remember.

The thing is, none of those are very good Superman movies. I do have some fondness for 1978 and Christopher Reeve is still probably the best Superman but, in my lil ole opinion, this is the first good Superman movie. I thought it was great. And it managed the rare superhero feat of having the save the world while having the stake remain, ultimately, personal.

I liked the side characters as well, but that's just where James Gunn's wheelhouse is. He's great at side characters. Guy Gardner is just as awful as he should be and Eve is a terrific scenestealer whose overthetopness helps make less developed characters like Jimmy Olsen more rounded.

Anyway, good stuff.

And I'm excited for the new Supergirl movie because I love the source material. It's superhero True Grit, yall. SUPERHERO TRUE GRIT.

Maybe I'll actually see it in theaters.


Image
HOME
Prime Video
Red One (2024)

I am startled by how good this is. JK Simmons and Dwayne Johnson's opening repartee is when I knew, but the whole movie basically delivered on that promise. Sure, the chicken and the ogre's cg aren't top notch (but lots of stuff is practical, which I never would have guessed!) and the final action sequence is a bit muddied and has a couple physical cheats, but besides that it's about the perfect Christmas action movie. Look, I love Die Hard but it's not for preteens. This can be.

Anyway, it's delightful. I can easily imagine returning to this every year or so.

No wonder it's back on top of the Amazon rankings a year later. People liked it!


Image
HOME
our dvd then YouTube
After the Thin Man (1936)

What a miserable viewing experience this was! Perhaps my favorite movie from one of my favorite franchises and at least fifteen years since I've seen any of them and apparently our disc has rotten making it impossible to watch past the halfway point so we have to finish watching it chopped up and sans murder. Awful way to introduce the Thin Man movies to our kids. Abysmal.

But it didn't stop me from loving Nick and Nora and watching (SPOILER ALERT) Jimmy Stewart be a bad guy.


And that's it! If we throw on a movie by 11:30pm December 31st we're calling that a 2026 movie!

So this is it (doo wop)

.

It's 12:08 pm on New Year's Eve and I don't see any books lying around that I'm likely to finish by midnight so I'm calling it at 117 books in 2025. So a pretty average year, I think:

2007—90
2008—124
2009—108
2010—62
2011—94
2012—82
2013—129
2014—103
2015—126
2016—66
2017—144
2018—116
2019—100
2020—115
2021—131
2022—145
2023—136
2024—129
2025—117

Anyway, who cares. That probably better predicts how many comics I read than how intellectually stalwartly I lived.

Next year will be the twentieth (!) year I've engaged in this process. Which is not an easy number to understand. I guess the next big one after that will be when I've been doing it half my life.

But I try not to think about this too much because what I wouldn't do to have lists of the books I read before I began all this. What did I read that I don't remember when I was eight or ten or fourteen or twenty-seven?

Well, it's fine. Someday we'll all shuffle off to that great night bookmobile in the sky and that will be that.

One my favorite writer died in the past week, one who's only appeared once in one of these lists but who I've written and spoken about plenty over the years (example). We just watched his funeral and parasocial relationships may be strange but they can be healthy.

Next up: another year. It should look a little different. I'm curious what number it will end at.

112) Giant Days: Volume Two by John Allison with Lissa Treiman and Max Sarin, finished December 3

If this had been volume one instead of volume one, I would not have read volume two. It's fun enough but it's really just sitcom logic at this point. Characters gain skills as needed so an issue's plot can be executed and then those traits are lost, ne'er to be recovered.

I already checked out volume three so I may well read it, but . . . I have a lot of other stuff checked out too. So we'll see. 

two or three days 

113) Taproot by Keezy Young, finished December 19

This book seemed like it was going to be one of the queer-friendly nonstories that's flooding the market at the moment, but I'm happy to say it did have a story and, above that, it wasn't normal boring pre-formed plot, either. The love story was on a different set of rails from the horror element which, as it ends up, wasn't actually horror anyway. The story set me up to expect some of the same tired crap I feel like is everywhere (the comics I have not finished, yall) but it's playing a much higher level of game and I respect it.

(Incidentally, checked this book out of the library because it didn't have Keezy's latest book which was promoted on a best-of-2025 list.)

Image

Anyway, the story's about a fellow who can see ghosts (one of whom is in love with him) and the unexpected problems that infect reality when you can, in fact, see ghosts. 

one sit 

114) The Last Flower by James Thurber, finished December 20

I own so much Thurber. But this may be the simplest way to understand his beauty and melancholy.

Of course, most people are just looking for the jokes.... 

one go 

115) Bowling with Corpses & Other Strange Tales from Lands Unknown by Mike Mignola

Image

 
This might be my favorite Mike Mignola book. I'd have to look through old reviews to check, but I love this new world he's created and the anthology of stories that fit into it. I love his loose and ragged art—a sort of studied sloppiness that only someone who has mastered his craft can pull off. At the back of this volume is an alternate version of one of the stories that is just in his black and white without Dave Stewart's colors and it's a marvel to behold. The man uses so much ink.

One useful way to consider Mignola is how he deals with the beautiful and the monstrous. For instance, his nudes—there are naked women in this books; some are likely beautiful some maybe not, but it is their interiority and their abstract existence of shadows an life that define them—not the curve of a breast. And on the opposite scale, sight horrifying and unpleasant too are defined by their context and their abstracted qualities.

I hope many more of these volumes appear. 

If for no other reason than for more commentary from ducks and cows.

Image
 about fifty hours 

116) Initial D Ominbus 1 by Shuichi Shigeno, finished December 25

I first heard of this on the Comic-Con floor where I picked up a promotional image because the kid looked like me in the Nineties and his car looked a lot like my first car, an '87 Accord.

Image 

Anyway, I didn't see it out, but I've been curious about it ever since and so when I saw this 500pp opening at the school library, I grabbed it to read over the holidays. Manga speeds by, after all, even something this thick.

It's about what I expected in that its mostly adolescent and post-adolescent boys racing cars. I like the blase hero who became a master at the drift in a way that keeps him from appreciating his awesomeness. It ends just before his second big race and it was all pretty exciting stuff.

My main complaint is the way the female characters are treated in the book. It feels rather like Shuichi Shigeno included them only because it's a rule and not because he wanted to. There's only one female character of note and this very boy-friendly book has one panel that for any redblooded heterosexual 14yrold will not only, necessarily, be a pornographic event, but will likely remain so for months, years afterward. It's very hot. I wanted to include that panel here so you to can be shocked at to its inclusion in what is other words a very kid-friendly book, but in the end decided it might do the same to my blog that it did to the blog.

But that's not the worst thing. This pretty high-school character is largely written "fine" EXCEPT (and it's a big EXCEPT) that in an underexplored subplot she's the victim of an Epstein-like character. She seems blissfully unaware that there's anything untoward about accepting large amounts of money from a rich old "dad" for getting naked in hotel rooms. I suppose in another thousand pages or so her honor will be defended by the series' hero (unless the series forgets her existence by then which, honestly, seems more likely), but for now the whole thing is a bizarre extra piece left in the box.

Looking for the right image to include (I didn't find it) I learned that this manga began back in the mid-90s and has become an anime and, twenty years ago, a live-action movie. So with luck we can chalk the disrespect given femanity to a former time, but man. It's wild that this was apparently the only way they could think to add a feminine aspect to a boy book. Woof. 

three or four days

117) Giant Days Volume Three by John Allison and Max Sarin (et al), finished December 27

Happy to say I liked this one much more than volume two. The writing has picked back up and the expressiveness of the art is delightful. I've come to like these three girls quite a lot and wish them well. Which is exactly why I've carved out a possible exception for them in my no-library-books-in-2026 rule

perhaps a week 

 

 

 


Previous books of 2025
(and years more distant)

2025-12-28

Hope, Jesus, and the New Year
(a svithe)

.

When you're the only person in town on the last Sunday of the year, you get to speak in church. 

.

The Old Testament is often reduced to its most exciting stories. It’s a big book and we don’t have much time so let’s create the world, part the Red Sea, kill a giant with a rock, and get on with our lives.

And I do love the flashy stories. When the Jews are abducted into Babylon you get Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego standing with someone like a son of God in flames so hot the men who’d thrown them in were killed. Their buddy Daniel, later in life, gets thrown to lions. His friend the king is relieved and grateful to Israel’s God that Daniel survives the night—and then killed those who got him thrown to the lions in the first place.

That exile was only seventy years long but it looms large in Jewish memory. When Matthew gives the genealogy of Jesus he notes that “there were fourteen generations...from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to” baby Jesus.

By the end of the Jewish exile, Persia had taken over Babylon, but the reputation of good people like Shadrach, Meshach, Abednego, and Daniel seems to have carried over to the new empire. A Jew named Nehemiah was one of the new king’s closest associates, his cupbearer. Cupbearers were deeply trusted by and intimate to the king they served. In a time of daily violence, a king’s life was only as safe as those closest to him. Nehemiah kept the king’s food safe, would even eat it first, as needed, willing to lay down his own life to preserve the king’s.

Nehemiah and his contemporary Ezra will only get one week of our attention next year in Come, Follow Me, but I was reading a nice little thing on this Protestant site about how Nehemiah is a type for Jesus; and their first point was about his cupbearing:

The book starts with Nehemiah as the cupbearer to the King. Such a position allowed him to sit at the right hand of the King, as he had to drink the King’s cup to test it for poison. He therefore had to be willing to die for the King if necessary. Like Nehemiah, Jesus dwelt at the right hand of the Father, and was willing to drink the cup the Father had for him, even though it meant his death.

But that’s just the beginning. Nehemiah, like Jesus, weeps over the condition of his people. Nehemiah, like Jesus, leaves the king and travels to Jerusalem to help his people reestablish their city and their temple and their faith. Nehemiah, like Jesus, then returns home to his king; during his absence from Jerusalem things fall apart and he has to return to reestablish the right way of doing things.

Studying Nehemiah’s life can teach us a lot about what it means to take on the name of Christ and to live the way he would have us live.

But Nehemiah’s story doesn’t have any fiery furnaces or lions’ dens. He never parts a sea or kills a giant with a rock. The books of Nehemiah and Ezra are more about dealing with rival politicians and building permits and scheduling conflicts. Neither of them is a prophet. They do know prophets but the prophets are always giving them poetic advice that doesn’t really solve the problem of where to source enough rock for both the temple and the city walls. Their city is post-destruction. It’s peopled with the poor and the desperate. They need to serve the least of them at the same time they’re accepting shipments from a king returning Israel’s stolen temple artifacts. Their days were confusing and unclear. They did their best, but couldn’t always be sure their best was best.

Sound familiar?

Today’s sacrament-meeting topic is Hope, Jesus, and the New Year and I think Nehemiah—his name means God Comforts—offers a good example for us to consider.

After all, when the Jews returned to Jerusalem, they recommitted themselves with an oath to obey what they knew from their scriptures, from the Torah. And the Torah, as I just read from a couple rabbis, “is the method of achieving hope…it embodies the principles and pathways that sustain hope.” And, once obtained, Jews don’t “lose hope because, even when waiting for goodness to emerge, a Jew refuses to give up working to create goodness—which in turn sustains hope.”

Hope, Jesus, and a New Year.

This year is ending. A new year is being born.

Every new day follows the death of the day previous.

The world is always being unmade: empires fall, cities crumble, babies become children become parents—and the world is always being created: empires rise, cities are built, babies become children become parents.

Sometimes is it easier for us to see what we are losing. Other times we more clearly perceive what is arriving.

But Jesus wept with Mary and Martha because the things we are losing matter. They matter a lot. Those relationships and events and beliefs and dreams were created to matter. And they matter still. And now they are gone.

The longer we live, the more things we lose.

Mikhail Bulgakov wrote, “Everything passes away…but the stars will still remain when the shadows of our presence and our deeds have vanished from the earth. There is no one who does not know that. Why, then, will we not turn our eyes toward the stars? Why?”

Perhaps it’s appropriate that we celebrate New Year’s at the darkest time of the year, when the stars shine their eternal shine most clearly, so we can witness the oldest creations remind us that creation is ongoing, that creation never ends.

The bit of poetry I always think of when hope comes up is Emily Dickinson’s “Hope is the thing with feathers.” I don’t have the rest of it memorized, but here it is:

“Hope” is the thing with feathers –
That perches in the soul –
And sings the tune without the words –
And never stops – at all –

And sweetest – in the Gale – is heard –
And sore must be the storm –
That could abash the little Bird
That kept so many warm –

I’ve heard it in the chillest land –
And on the strangest Sea –
Yet – never – in Extremity,
It asked a crumb – of me.

Hope as a songbird. Something small and fragile with hollow bones and only ounces heavy. Yet it sings its tune and never stops – at all. It sounds sweetest in the sorest storm, the sort of storm that should batter and destroy things small and fragile. Yet in the chillest land and the strangest sea, on it sings, on it sings, on it sings.

Hope is the thing with feathers.

And it flies alongside us in the sorest storms and chillest lands and strangest seas.

I’m inspired by a former sister missionary, Judith Mahlangu of South Africa, who once told President Holland, “[We] did not come this far only to come this far.”

Here we are at the edge of a new year. If we look, we’ll see plenty of things ended—or ending—or maybe ending.

But listen for the song of hope—the thing with feathers. Let it perch in your soul. Listen to it sing the tune without the words – and never stop – at all.

Paul asked, “What is our hope…? Are not…ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ…?”

Paul told us, even “in this present world; [to] Look for that blessed hope…our Saviour Jesus Christ; Who gave himself for us.”

Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us, is our hope.

When cast into the fiery furnace, Jesus Christ is our hope.

When thrown to lions, Jesus Christ is our hope.

When building a city wall from ruins, Jesus Christ is our hope.

When dealing with an obnoxious neighbor, Jesus Christ is our hope.

When puzzling over the words of prophets, Jesus Christ is our hope.

Whether on the chillest lands or the strangest seas, Jesus Christ is our hope.

As one year ends, Jesus Christ is our hope.

As another year begins in the darkest part of the year with faraway stars obscured by rain clouds, Jesus Christ is our hope.

Maybe our lives feel more Nehemiah than Daniel, but whether our troubles are municipal squabbles or ravenous beasts, Jesus Christ is our hope.

Nehemiah didn’t live the sort of life that gets epic films made of it, but he did his best—and now you can get online and read about him—Nehemiah!—as a type of Christ.

As the new year begins, whenever you need Jesus in your life, come to church—this room is filled with Nehemiahs dealing with their own rock-sourcing issues and rival governors—each one a type of Christ as they live their life in faith, having taken the name of Christ upon them.

When we were baptized and took Christ’s name, one life ended and we were buried in the water. But then we were resurrected out of the water into a new life. Endings, beginnings; old, new; death, resurrection.

But, as the Latter-day Saint philosopher Adam Miller wrote, “Resurrection doesn’t solve [the problem of things passing away].... Resurrection doesn’t freeze the world in place.... Resurrection is the promise that, in Christ, life can continue to pass, not that it will finally stop passing.”

And that’s why, in the new year, as we look to Christ, our hope can’t be based on an end of ending. That won’t happen. Instead, let’s base our hopes in Christ and his promise that he is with us, that creation continues in our lives, that on the chillest lands and the strangest seas and during the most pedestrian of hardships, we matter to him, he remembers us, and the song of hope continues in our souls.

Moroni taught us that “whoso believeth in God might with surety hope for a better world, yea, even a place at the right hand of God, which hope cometh of faith…which [faith] would make them sure and steadfast, always abounding in good works....”

That’s what we can give each other in the new year. Hope—lives lived by hope—strengthening the hope of others.

And “what is our hope…?

“Are [ye] not… in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ…?”

Look around.

Yes. You are.

In the name of our hope, in the name of our brother and our fellow-traveler, in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

File:Wishing You a Happy New Year, from the New Years 1890 series (N227) issued by Kinney Bros. MET DPB874638.jpg 

previous svithe on thutopia / thubstack

2025-12-26

Books I will not finish in 2025
(or 2026, for that matter)

 

.

I think about doing this every December, but I’m a-gonna hold myself to it in 2026 and not check out any books from the library. I’m going to stick with the books I own—which includes literal thousands of volumes I’ve never read. I’m overdue in my own house and that needs to change.

Because of that, I’m returning all the library books I currently have, finished or not. But this declaration of bankruptcy requires some itemization. So lets get to it.

Image

Tomato Cain and Other Stories by Nigel Kneale

I was turned on to this author by a Bulwark essay and while I don’t usually make it through short-story collections I really wanted to this time. The ones I did read were varied and intriguing. I didn’t get to all the stories I had been warned were most sticky but the opening story, the title story, one he said was an outlier, is seeming like one I will never forget. It’s about a religious man in a small town were tomatoes have never been seen before and how his conviction re his own righteousness leads to his being brought low. It may not be anything akin to traditional horror but it’s playing by the same rules in a completely different field. Like playing hockey on a tennis court.

Cat Ninja: Cat’s Claw by Matthew Cody et al.

This is a kids book in the worst way. It has dumb charm, sure, but . . . I don’t need to finish it. One-point-two of the stories and a skim of the rest was plenty sufficient.

Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass

I had been reading this at school. I had a bookmark in one volume of a class set that had been sitting unused in a copyroom for most of a decade. But then someone decided to teach it, I guess, and removed all the copies?!?! But what about my clear plastic bookmark!?! Anyway, I checked out a new copy but I just don’t like it. I want my old copy back. So I guess I’m willing to wait.

Brother Brontë by Fernando A. Flores

I’ve checked this out twice. I’m fascinated by this dystopian Texas border town. I’ve read the first couple pages and know I want to finish it, but it keeps getting pushed aside. Let’s see if I’m still interested in 2027.

Why Fascists Fear Teachers: Public Education and the Future of Democracy by Randi Weingarten

This is a great little book for those who’ve never thought about what teachers actually do, but I have to say it feels a little redundant to me who lives it every day. The book covers four main things teachers do that fascists hate and they string together some quotations and old speeches (or so it feels). But it’s a quick and easy read and if you don’t recognize the disguised attacks on American public education, it’s an excellent introduction to our now. Here are the four things we teachers are up to in the bright lights of the classroom:

• TEACHERS TEACH CRITICAL THINKING

This is the thing that surprises me most about right-wing anti-teacher commentary, this idea that teachers are out to indoctrinate people. I suppose there’s some of that but really what most people who stick with the profession care about is kids thinking for themselves. And that itself is a concept many find dangerous. But if you’re ideas are so fragile and/or wrong that careful examination will destroy them, perhaps they deserve to be destroyed.

But then, I am a teacher.

•TEACHERS FOSTER SAFE AND WELCOMING COMMUNITIES

Not all teachers succeed at this but rare is the teacher for whom this is not a primary goal. No one can survive in this profession without caring about humans. And once you start caring about humans, it’s hard not to want to make things better for them. That starts with individuals in your classroom but as your eyes open it spreads to each student’s family and communities as well.

• TEACHERS CREATE OPPORTUNITIES

This is one of the hardest things about being a teacher because she’s right—we want to give our students opportunities. But this is one of the easiest things to take away. Visiting museums and historical sites and cultural events and competitive academics—these things take money! And money is the easiest thing for antiliberal culture warriors to take away. Even in California essentially limitless money, redirecting it from private pockets to a better future is a hard sell. But we do what we can. Most of my field trips have been walks to the cemetery....

• TEACHERS BUILD STRONG UNIONS

This one I think is perhaps the most understood and least appreciated. I grew up in red towns and know perfectly well that unions are the enemy of good people everywhere. This feeling is the result of concerted effort by powerful people with lots of money over decades and decades (and, to be fair, some bad behavior by some unions in years past). But when you listen to people’s complaints about unions, it’s generally a real crabs-in-the-bucket–type situation. Why should teachers have a thing I don’t have? is a fair question, but the answer isn’t take it away from teachers; the answer is you deserve that thing too. But it’s in capital’s best interest to push AI on you rather than give you fully covered health care. That’s why unions in the public space have to push the conversation forward. And you—whoever you are, whatever you do for a living—start imagining a world where you too have access to collective bargaining. We are the ants.

Why Fascists Fear Teachers: Public Education and the Future of Democracy: Weingarten, Randi ...

Uncle Silas by Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu

I’m so intrigued by this spooky Victorian mystery. But it’s long and a library book. So....

Art of Lying Down: A Guide to Horizontal Living by Bernd Brunner

Here’s a way to make a living! A bunch of short essays that have a fact or three so they count as educational but are so simple as to be difficult to neither write nor read.

The Art of Lying Down: A Guide to Horizontal Living

I really like the book cover and if I owned the book I would finish it—nice short essays before bed (and on topic, to boot!). But with a due date, it’s just not worth it.

Cry When the Baby Cries by Becky Barnicoat

This little comic about motherhood is one of many from this best-comics-of-2025 list I tried to track down. Lady Steed’s currently reading it and if she recommends it to me, I probably will as well. But short her ringing endorsement, I’m afraid it will be a casualty of my good intentions.

And then? And then? What else? by Daniel Handler

I checked this writing memoir out the same day as one of my favorite books read of 2025 and I experienced a bit of whiplash simply because they are so entirely different.

I love David Handler and I like this book a lot. I actually have emailed me which essay I left off on so I can return to it some day.

But it’s not a book I need right now and so we’ll let it go.

Poems by Charles Baudelaire

I checked this out because Handler loves Baudelaire. I get why he does but this set wasn’t pulling me in. Let’s blame it on the translation.

Image

So will I stick with this goal of mine?

Back in 2007, I decided to only read books I’d already started. That felt great, honestly, but I didn’t attempt to stick with it for an entire year. In 2016 I attempted only started books (with a couple planned exceptions) for the full year. I finished the year with only 66 books (the 66th a clear violation of the rules) and no mention of this plan.

BUT THIS IS DIFFERENT.

Sure, I’m four years into The Stand (enjoying it but it’s LONG book) and I still haven’t finished Don Quixote (lost my copy)—not to mention the dozens (probably) of other books that I’ve started but haven’t finished—and so could make that my goal again. But what I really want to do is start books I own. There is no limit to genre or time period sticking with my own books, but I do think the publication dates will skew longerago when I stay home.

But I don’t know! It’s an experiment!

I have already delayed all the arrival dates of books I have on hold at the library except this one (coming November) and comics from that list I mentioned that the library hasn’t purchased yet. I may give myself permission to continue reading Giant Days if my time in the high-school library encourages it (and if book three [in process] doesn’t annoy me as much as book two [review coming next week] did). The main thing is no big new commitments. Something that can be read in a couple hours, okay, maybe, but no Brother Brontë with it’s 352 pages.

I’m curious how disciplined you all are with your for-fun reading. Do you chase the newest butterflies? Are you religiously checking off a list you made your freshman year of college? Do tell!


2025-12-18

Turn it up to one hundred eleven

.

My eleventy-first book's a spot of manga, but on the journey there we do some popular litcrit, some drama, some Dave Barry, some Austen sequelry, and lots more comics, only from the English-speaking word.

The good news is, it's not too late to ask for one of these for Christmas. 

.

102) How to Read Novels Like a Professor by Thomas C. Foster, finished November 18

It's hard to tell from the review, but I was pretty ecstatic when I read Foster's How to Read Literature Like a Professor a decade and a half ago. And I've been repeating that ecstatic review (and perhaps getting more ecstatic?) ever since, to get high school kids to read it. And now I've finally read another in what is now a decent-sized series.

This one feels much more high-brow to me. I can't imagine making an entire class of students read it. Individuals? Sure. Some would take to it. But not everyone.

I enjoyed listening to Foster talk about books he likes, but I don't think I liked it nearly as much.

But I say all this having underlined almost the entirety of chapter 12 and thrusting notes into the margins about what to make students do with his rant on sentences.

And if you move through my copy you'll find lots more marks than just that.

And then there's all the snippets I added to Wikiquote including three on this page.

So now that I think about it, I guess I liked it quite a bit!

about fifteen months 

103) Major Barbara by George Bernard Shaw, finished November 30

I haven't read Shaw since college, circa 1998, Pygmalion. I believe I liked it.

I had two copies of Major Barbara at school so when Lady Steed's book group chose it I brought them home. She read the play proper and I read Shaw's screen adaptation. (They were not the same book!)

I really loved it. I really don't know how to feel about it though.

For one thing, I'm not sure how serious Shaw is about the winning philosophy. I suspect he basically believes it, but his mouthpiece—a purveyor of human death and misery—is a curious person to preach the gospel of ending death and slavery. And Shaw's simultaneous tearing down of both religious and secular pieties and granfalloons while doing so through England's most brutally successful capitalist caused me all sorts of conflict. I don't know, in the end, where the play stands.

Me, I disagree with it far more than I agree with it, but Shaw is much too good a writer to allow anyone to leave with a clear sense of what is the most right and what is the most wrong. In a way, it's a tragedy of moral collapse. But the characters don't see it that way at all. Have they maintained some sort of morality? Will they be able to change the world (whatever they imagine they mean by that) with the resources of capitalism? Or is the elephant charging along as they whistle some moralish excuses?

Sad I'm not in the book group. I look forward to experiencing the conversation secondhand.

OH I FORGOT: One thing I meant to talk about (until the themes pushed everything out of my head) is how funny it was. honestly, it's much like Oscar Wilde albeit the jokes are more frosting here than cake. Regardless, it was funny in both dialogue and character.

about a week

104) Sweet Tooth Compendium by Jeff Lemire, finished November 24

I'm a big fan of this story. It's dystopian and dark, bloody, violent, but in the end it is also life-affirming and about heroisms both big and small. It's a story about family and civilization and hope. And it's utterly wonderful.

This is the entire original run in a single volume (a whopping 915 pages!) which means we follow Gus from childhood to old age without needing to switch books.

I'm a big Lemire fan but I've read Sweet Tooth more than his other books (at least twicish before); I reread it this time because I learned there's a new addendum that came out and I wanted the old fresh before I attacked the new. It'll show up here soon.

Anyway, he's a terrific writer and his art is so evocative even when it's tamed down as it is (mostly) here to be DC-friendly. Re-recommended without reservation.

Image 

perhaps a month

105) Space Bear by Ethan Young, finished November 25

About what I expected. Sort of a Missile Mouse–light. No words but heavily mythopoeic metaphors for feeeelings.

Good fun for kids. 

a night 

106) Are Comic Books Real? by Alex Nall, finished on November 26

I have a strict rule that I won't read comics out loud more than once (at most) per kid. Lil'cee recently found this one and has been reading it and, knowing I hadn't read it to her before, asked me to read it to her. So I did. Doesn't take long, it's pleasant, and, bonus, I could censor a bit as I read. (Mostly one memory of a bad day of teaching that involves fs and ss and ns.)

Anyway. It's still pretty good. 

an evening 

107) Sweet Tooth: The Return by Jeff Lemire, finished November 26

This is only a fraction the length of the original Sweet Tooth (see above) and, without neglecting good character development etc, leans much more heavily into the mythopoeic elements of the story. This is about all time being one great round and all stories being one story, etc. It takes place 300 years after the events of the original story and has, indeed, many echos. But it is not the same—even though the point is that yes, actually, it is the same story.

two or three days 

108) Giant Days: Volume One by John Allison with Lissa Treiman and Max Sarin, finished December 3

Fire across the hall from my classroom the day before the strike so I'm in the library. And, in the library, I decided to take seriously the big display advertising the Giant Days series of comics. And it is excellent.

Lissa's art has a rougher and looser line than Max's but once accustomed to Matt's cleaner, tighter lines, I got to like it about as much.

It's the story of three freshmen girls at an English university in the 2010s and their various adventures. It's overthetop and comedic while grounded and true to life. I honestly loved it. I'll have to check out volume two over the strike.

Image
 
This collection includes two stories writer and drawn by John Allison as appendices and they were right to put them in the back. He's competent, sure, but the style is still uncertain and the writing is less grounded. He worked out the kinks in story, character, and setting, then dumped the fun info into a subonepage flashback. Artistically, that was the right choice. And we get to enjoy his fun original version afterwards.

Anyway. Terrific. 

109) The Secret Life of Miss Mary Bennet by Katherine Cowley, finished December 13

Let me start by saying I'm excited to read volume two of this series. The way it ended was satisfying plotwise, sure, but it was particularly satisfying in a way I did not expect. (Look at this page's source code [eg ctrl+u] for spoilers as to why.)

Writing a sequel to a beloved classic is fraught territory, however. For instance, perhaps I loved bits about the Bennets while other things perhaps did not match my reading of the characters or the world or whatever. Some changes I don't mind (eg, setting aside Austen's apparent disinterest in global events), some changes I understand (eg, taking pleasure in exploring details of the Regency era that would not have been worth stating aloud in a novel written contemporaneously), some I disagree with (eg, modern editing's requirements for regular dialogue tags).

But should a modern sequel to a beloved classic be beholden to it's themes and style? The the former I say barely. To the latter, I suppose not, but when it's a book I know as well as Pride and Prejudice (I may well have taught it to over a thousand students by now) there's no getting over my persnickitiness. This is the danger, of course, in writing sequels to beloved classics and there's no way around it. In my mind, getting me to love the ending regardless is the real win here. But that's spoiler territory and there's an extra step to see all that.

two or three week 

Image

110) Class Clown by Dave Barry, finished December 13

Dave Barry is one of the great American humorists and this valedictory lap / writerly memoir is as fine an introduction to the man and his work as it is a final chapter (Allegedly). A lot of stuff here I remember (perhaps from a different angle) and many things that feel new (even if they are not), but regardless—for a lot of people of my generation, if we ever write anything funny, we cannot escape his influence.

(Incidentally, it was nice to hear him cite his own influences—and for one of them to be halfread on my nightstand!)

If you like him or humor or memoirs or just need a nice time, this is an easy book to recommend. Even though it is valedictory, I think this is my recommendation for anyone reading him for the first time.

(Well, anyone who's an adult and reading him for the first time.)

It was great to hang out and listen to our jokedad reminisce about times we'll never see again. 

a couple weeks 

111) One-Punch Man 01 by One and Yusuke Murata, finished December 18

It's astonishing that a jokey webcomic leaning into how dumb overpowered superheros are has become an enormously popular franchise in its own right. Seeing the first volume lying out at the school library made me want to try it on and it is, indeed, pretty delightful. I do wonder if it's still silly come volume, say, 32, but here in volume 1 it's all about knocking out monsters with one punch, sexy mosquito ladies, and being more upset about forgetting take the trash can down to the street than seeing a mountain-large snowman out for blood.

I mean. What's not to like? 

before and after school 

 


Previous books of 2025
(and years more distant)