Alledgedly, DreamWidth has better access controls than LiveJournal. At least, that's what people seem to think. The actual explanation is over at http://www.dreamwidth.org/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=124

Actually, it looks to me as though it's worse than LJ.

In LJ, create two custom friends groups: "default access", and "default read". Whenever you post anything, give access to the "default access" group, instead of just "Friends". And when you want to read, navigate to http://<username>.livejournal.com/friends/default+read (in fact, by default your friends page shows the "Default View" group). Of course, if you want extra groups, by all means.

This seems to have an advantage over the DreamWidth arrangement in that the people in these groups can't tell (unlike DreamWidth's notification of "access" or "subscribe"). So if there's somebody that you're happy to read, but not give access to, you just leave them out of your "default access" group, and they'll never know.

LJ's interface for this is a bit more fiddly, I'll grant. But the functionality is there.

Why do you think DreamWidth's so much better?
Tags:
wimble: (Default)
( May. 2nd, 2009 09:19 pm)
Ahah. I was getting thoroughly confused by DreamWidth's crossposting form, because the form has half a dozen visible fields, which are then hidden with JavaScript. Since I was running noScript, they didn't hide. And left me wondering what they all did.

With the JavaScript running, it all became trivial!
Tags:
wimble: (Default)
( May. 1st, 2009 04:26 pm)
Well, I seem to be here.

Wazzup?
Tags:
.

Profile

wimble: (Default)
wimble

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags