Category Archives: blight

Welcom to Pennsylvania Wild!

So proclaims a couple of official  Commonwealth of Pennsylvania signs along Interstate 80. And so proclaims this billboard that sprung up in response to the trashing of Pennsylvania Wild by the natural gas drilling business. I’ve always hated the Pennsylvania billboards as all blight. And I feel lucky to be living in a state where billboards were outlawed more than 40 years ago. What do you think?Image And why, after twenty years of residency in Pennsylvania, do I still hear nothing from state agencies, like the Game Commission and Fish and Boat Commission regarding the loss everyday of wild places and the crying need for a public land acquisition program.

Land owner protests eminent domain with billboard-like declaration

This is a new winkle on land-use law. And despite the blight created by the landowner’s protest sign, I wish the guy luck in his battle over eminent domain proceedings designed to transfer his land to Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va. A conservation note: The state in which I now live, Vermont, recently celebrated the 40th anniversary of its no billboards in Vermont law. For Pennsylvanians toiling around the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton locale on Interstate 81, such a law would be a giant step toward livability. That’s why it won’ thappen in Pennsylvania.

The car vs. wild America

Today’s five-mile exercise walk yielded sightings of the usual road-killed wildlife: squirrels, American robins, skunk, raccoon, opossum, white-tailed deer, monarch butterfly, orang sulphur butterfly, etc. etc. Meanwhile, the American love-affair with the almighty motor vehicle marches on, and on, an on . . .Image

A pipeline from boreal Canada to Texas oil refineries?

Are they kidding? This Keystone  XL project — 1,700 miles of underground pipe — would be a severe mistake. The environmental risks, for both the U.S. and Canada, are enormous. The first step in the process is to strip-mine huge chunks of the province of Alberta’s boreal forest. The oil, a tar-like substance called bitumen, is then extracted with steam or hot water, which in turn is produced by burning natural gas. The E.P.A. estimates that the greenhouse gas emissions from tar sands oil — even without counting the destruction of forests that sequester carbon — are 82 percent greater than those produced by conventional crude oil.

Today’s NY Times carries a nice punctual editorial about this boondoggle. It should be required reading by all politicians who accept campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry and its PR mouthpieces.

Quote of the day

“It’s obvious that there’s still a large, pro-car agenda out there,” he said. “It’s all about getting cars into the downtown, isn’t it? The transportation system is broken in a thousand ways.”

Muddy situation in Illinois for soil and water conservation districts

It’s that same old tired “budget woe” we’re hearing a lot from the loud mainstream media these days. An open note to all politicians: There can be no economy at all if natural land is kissed goodbye for strip malls, etc.

Quote of the week

“I believe a lot of people share my feelings about the tragic landscape of highway strips, parking lots, housing tracts, mega-malls, junked cities, and ravaged countryside that makes up the everyday environment where most Americans live and work.”

James Howard Kunstler, The Geography of Nowhere

Ex-Pennsylvania coal town fights blight

This article, from the Hazleton, Pa., newspaper, misses the city’s real blight by a long ways. Let us count the easily seen blight categories: coal stripping pits filled with junk like old tires; strip shopping center after strip shopping center; the near-absence of infrastructure that would increase its walkability; huge parking lots (parking lagoons) which serve to symbolize the city’s and area’s reliance on the personal automobile; abandoned retail complexes; a crusty old shopping mall; billboard after billboard, some of them advertising the skills of ambulance-chasing lawyers; thousands upon thousands of discarded beer and soda cans and glass bottles; the complete absence of sidewalks in car-happy neighborhood after neighborhood; and more. What does all this have to do with conservation? Lots. Blight is symbolizes a town’s very lack of interest in preserving open space, forests, natural lands, etc. There is a reason behind the livability of states and cities like Vermont, Oregon Burlington, Vt., Portland, Ore., and others. And that is those places’ caring of the public realm, from Vermont’s 40-year-old ban on billboards, to Portland’s reputation as a city that not only encourages bicycling and walking, but actively promotes those simple, non-polluting forms of transportation. And don’t even get me started on the blight of urban sprawl.

Protect Adirondacks from eyesores

Here’s a letter to the editor of the outstanding conservation-leaning journal “Adirondack Explorer” I recently penned. It was published in the November/December issue.

I write in response to your article “Losing the high ground [September/October]. During my 26-year career in the Air Force, which included three wonderful years at the now-closed Plattsburgh Air Force Base in the late 1980s, I have gotten long looks at both the good and bad in terms of land-use practices. I still consider – even after two decades in Pennsylvania – the Adirondacks to be my real home, and it is the wide-open, wild (and largely blight-free) landscape that makes the region attractive to me.

I remember well the first time I saw the mansion from atop the summit of Baxter Mountain, perhaps just a year or two after it was built. My initial reaction was, “There goes the neighborhood.” I haven’t changed my thinking since.

On our many return visits to the Adirondacks since heading south, we’ve always come home with many lessons to share regarding the visual and spiritual health of the public realm. In Pennsylvania where public land is mostly a dream, not a reality, we see on a daily basis the blight, sprawl, trophy homes, mansions on hills, and McMansions that continue to pave over the natural land.

Don’t let this happen to the Adirondacks. Please.

Alan C. Gregory

Lt. Col., USAF, Ret.

Challenges are many when it comes to reusing the abandoned factory

And for saving “raw land,” as the kings behind many of the industrial “development” fiefdoms in the northeastern corner of Pa. like to call it. Here’s a good newspaper article from Hampton Roads, Va., about this issue.