Tag Archives: open space

Open space? What open space?

This proposed development in southeastern Virginia may be a tragedy waiting to happen, and good luck to the opponents of building on the last bit of open, natural land in the Western Branch area of Chesapeake. This is not about providing new housing to those who need it. It’s about greed, pure and simple.

Putting wildlife first: A case study from Idaho

This article highlights the benefits to wildlife and people of public investment in preserving natural lands. I know the spot described in this article only too well, having once lived not too far from it. Anyway, the case study explored in this piece shows once again the worth and value of the public investing its money in saving open space and wild, natural land.

Colo. city preserves natural area

And this isn’t the first fro Fort Collins, where voters approved a 0.25 percent sale tax to fund an open space/natural area preservation program that’s a good model for municipalities everywhere. Only I don’t think it will ever happen in this corner of Pennsylvania because elected municipal leaders are just too tied down to scraping the land for property tax dollars, forgetting all the while that open space and natural areas do not require any public services, like sewer lines, new schools, etc. Read about Fort Collins here.

The Vermont call: An open, green landscape

I fell in love with Vermont while honeymooning there in the fall of 1979. My love for the Green Mountain State has only grown since. I was especially thrilled — as was Monica, I know — when the Air Force sent me to Plattsburgh Air Force Base, just across Lake Champlain from Burlington, VT, in 1986.

This nice essay about Vermont appeared in today’s edition of the Burlington Free-Press.

Chesapake Bay states want federal help

Help in preserving natural, native land, of which Wild Nature is not making any more these days. I find it increasingly saddening to see this conservation message going right over the heads of polluter-friendly local politicians in these parts. I say again, it would arguably be cheaper for the people who already live in a given municipality to buy up and preserve all the remaining open space in their area than pay more in taxes to pay for the services demanded by new development. What is so damn hard to understand about this proven idea? Duh

Read about the Chesapeake Bay states’ call for financial help in this article.

Columnist: Congress should act on LWCF

After all, Americans spend gazillions, almost daily, to pave over nature yet hardly a matching dime, much less a nickel, to preserve wild and undeveloped countryside. That’s what the Land and Water Conservation Fund is all about. Read what one columnist has to say to Congress.

Conserving a conservation fund

Nice editorial here from the NY Times, echoing what I have written (see below) for this week’s outdoors page conservation column.

Pennsylvanians are right to be proud of our state’s outdoor heritage, and believe that it’s important to pass down our outdoor values to our kids and our grandkids. And it’s our job to make sure our forests, mountains, fish and wildlife and clean water are protected for centuries to come.

We can help do this by urging our elected officials to ensure public lands are treated as the treasures they truly are. (Municipal officials who see only property tax dollars coming from “available” land are wrong). The Land and Water Conservation Fund balances the extraction and sale of federal natural resources — offshore oil and gas — with the permanent protection of important lands and waters and access to recreation and natural heritage for all Americans.

Authorized in 1965, LWCF is an enduring conservation legacy that makes even greater sense today as America faces the greatest environmental disaster of our time — the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The Gulf spill is a sobering reminder of how vulnerable our public lands, waters, communities and wildlife can be.

Here in the mid-Atlantic, where the sprawl and road-builders seemingly rule the debate at times), we need sustained investment to provide long-term protection of the rivers, lakes, mountains, and wide open spaces so important to all of us. The Land and Water Conservation Fund was created to do just that.

Designed to create and maintain local, state, and national natural resource areas, the LWCF provides funding to state and federal governments to keep the promise made to protect our counttry’s  special places — everything from local baseball fields to Yellowstone National Park — for future generations. LWCF-funded purchases of lands and conservation easements also help private landowners, public agencies and communities protect states’ natural heritage and recreational assets.

The LWCF can receive up to $900 million a year from energy royalties. But despite an increase in energy production, funding dedicated to protecting land and water has been low and unpredictable and often diverted elsewhere by Congress. LWCF is the only fund providing a specific conservation benefit from federal energy development.

Now is the time to ensure that LWCF becomes a dedicated source, protected from being diverted to unrelated boondoggle spending. One of our most precious resources is the dwindling natural beauty too many people seem to taking for granted as they rush to flip on the TV or play the latest video game. By funding the LWCF, we are not only creating recreational opportunities for hikers, hunters, and anglers, but also injecting tourist dollars into states’ economies. The LWCF has also funded the purchase of land and conservation easements that have helped private landowners, communities, and public agencies protect states’ agricultural and recreational heritage.

A recent poll by Zogby International shows that in one state lone – Montana – nearly 80 percent of Americans support fully funding the Land and Water Conservation Fund to protect our national parks and develop recreation opportunities in the states. And LWCF has already left a lasting legacy here — from protecting natural areas and setting aside wild places to creating and improving recreational facilities in urban areas.

The LWCF’s work is evident across the state at parks, forests and protected watersheds. Money from the LWCF has also funded urban parks and recreational facilities. LWCF is instrumental in the creation of tennis courts, swimming pools, skate parks, and other types of recreational facilities and spaces.

With lawmakers support, we can help ensure that Pennsylvanians have clean places to hunt, fish and camp for generations to come. Sn. Jeff Bingaman from New Mexico has teamed up with another senator to introduce a bill that guarantees funding for the LWCF. This bill would “provide consistent and reliable authority for, and for the funding of, the Land and Water Conservation Fund to maximize the effectiveness of the fund for future generations, and for other purposes.

Now is the time to thank our senators for their support of the LWCF, and to urge them to continue pursuing legislation to fully fund it.

Va. coastal city to spend millions to preserve open space

Virginia Beach, in fact, has a multimillion-dollar open space preservation fund. And the city just announced this major deal to preserve a big chunk of shoreline land that had long been eyed for a sprawling subdivision. Congratulations to Virginia Beach. Now, why in the hell can’t other municipalities, including many in Pennsylvania, take similar measures and invest in open space and quality of life? Duh?

14 Neb. counties oppose conservation measures

What knuckleheads. The proverbial bottom line? Undeveloped, open, natural land requires nearly zero public services, funded by tax dollars, while yielding untold benefits to society. Hello Nebraska county officials. Article here.

An open space promise: Let’s make it work, finally

Two U.S. senators, as this NY Times editorial notes, have introduced legislation to make the Land and Water Conservation Fund work the way it was supposed to when set up decades ago.