SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 DECEMBER

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel

You may post comments at the end of this post or send them to [email protected]

“Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away.”— Philip K. Dick

“I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses.” — Johannes Kepler

THE CLIMATE CON IS COLLAPSING

The Christmas Gift that Climate Grinches Can’t Abide

by Vijay Jayaraj

The quietude of looking out the kitchen window on a December morning at a meadow dusted in snow is magical. A deer pauses at the edge of the wood, breath steaming in the cold air, grazing on whatever bits of green poke through the snow. It is a scene replicated on greeting cards and stamped on cookie tins.

Part of the magic behind that tableau—from the roast in the oven to the cranberries on a plate, from the pine and hardwoods standing tall outside to the browsing fauna—is a phenomenon the establishment media ignore: CO2-driven, NASA-acknowledged greening of Earth.

Satellite data from the last four decades confirm a significant increase in vegetation over as much as half the globe. During this period, atmospheric CO2 increased from about 350 parts per million (ppm) to more than 400 ppm, mostly from the burning of fossil fuels.

It is a gift arriving right on cue to meet a continuous increase in population and demand for food. This basic sustenance allows for all other human endeavors—developments in artificial intelligence, medicine, and more. It is difficult to write computer code on an empty stomach.

Behind this gift of plenty is a process fundamental to all life, starting with plants: Photosynthesis is a mechanism by which plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to make sugars for food. When atmospheric CO2 rises—whether from the emissions of human activity or any other source—plants grow faster. A side benefit is that they use water more efficiently, making them more resilient to arid conditions and extending their geographic range. (Read more) ☼

A Huge Retraction: Journal Nature has finally retracted ‘fatally flawed’ study used to ‘justify projections of catastrophic future climate impacts’ – Authors admit errors are ‘too substantial’ for just a correction (Read article) ☼

Astrophysicist Challenges The Climate Consensus: It’s The Sun, Not CO2

Dr. Willie Soon says decades of research show solar activity, not human CO2, drives Earth’s climate.

by Pierre Gosselin

In a candid interview with the German language Weltwoche, astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon asserts that the sun is the overwhelmingly dominant force driving Earth’s climate, not human-emitted CO2.

His decades of research into solar and stellar physics led him to the controversial conclusion that focusing on regulating CO2? is misguided.

“You can’t make laws against the sun,” he argues.

Dr. Soon states that the sun provides 99.99% of the energy that powers our weather and climate, and satellite data confirms that solar radiation is not a constant, but fluctuates, particularly in the UV and X-ray ranges.

He contends that temperature patterns over the last 150 years correlate much better with solar activity fluctuations than with CO2? levels.

According to Soon’s analysis, the CO2? signal is below the detection limit as a primary climate driver. (Read more) ☼

Wrong, Phys.org, Faulty Thermometers Aren’t Evidence of a ‘Climate Roller Coaster’

by Anthony Watts

Phys.org recently published “Global warming amplifies extreme day-to-day temperature swings, study shows,” reporting on a new study in Nature Climate Change which claims that human-caused warming is intensifying rapid day-to-day temperature fluctuations, in the process creating a new category of climate hazard. This is false. The underlying study not only relies almost entirely on notably flawed climate-model assumptions, but astonishingly also ignores well-documented, real-world factors that directly affect short-term temperature variability, such as the urban heat island effect (UHI) and temperature-station siting biases. These omissions fatally undermine the study’s conclusions. (Read more) ☼

Remember when they told you climate change was causing a ‘mass extinction’? Never mind!

by Anthony Watts

Extinction rates have slowed across many plant and animal groups, study shows

Prominent research studies have suggested that our planet is currently experiencing another mass extinction, based on extrapolating extinctions from the past 500 years into the future and the idea that extinction rates are rapidly accelerating.

A new study by Kristen Saban and John Wiens with the University of Arizona Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, however, revealed that over the last 500 years extinctions in plants, arthropods and land vertebrates peaked about 100 years ago and have declined since then. Furthermore, the researchers found that the past extinctions underlying these forecasts were mostly caused by invasive species on islands and are not the most important current threat, which is the destruction of natural habitats. (Read more) ☼

Thankfulness for Climate and Energy Reality

by Anthony Watts

What We Should Be Grateful For in Climate, Energy, Living Standards, and Human Prosperity

Every year, as the cranberry sauce congeals and the football game drones on in the background, we’re told to “reflect on what really matters.” Fair enough. But rarely does anyone suggest reflecting on something far more fundamental to our modern existence: the extraordinary environmental stability, energy abundance, and human progress that underpin every comfort we enjoy today.

Instead, we hear about apocalyptic tipping points, “unlivable” futures, and the suggestion that your Thanksgiving turkey may soon be illegal unless it’s raised on insect protein and good intentions. But beneath the noise, the data tell a very different story—one worth genuine gratitude.

Below is an extended reflection—yes, a long one, the length you’d expect from me—covering the things we should be thankful for when it comes to climate, energy, standard of living, and human prosperity, backed by evidence, historical perspective, and just enough wit to keep things digestible. (Read more) ☼

No hurricanes made landfall in the US in 2025

Hurricane Erin caused high tides along the East Coast in August, but did not make landfall.

The 2025 North Atlantic hurricane season is officially over, and for the first time since 2015, not a single one made landfall in the US. There was still plenty of activity, however:

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration had predicted an above-average season of activity for 2025. The agency said that the season fell within the ranges it predicted for “named storms, hurricanes, and major hurricanes.” Between June 1 and November 30, the Atlantic basin produced 13 named storms and five hurricanes. Three of the hurricanes reached Category 5 status, a tie for the second-most on record. While the US got off scot-free on the hurricanes-making-landfall front this year, other nations were nowhere near as lucky. Hurricane Melissa hit Jamaica as a Category 5 and brought significant devastation at the end of October before moving on and hitting Cuba as a major hurricane. Melissa ranks in the top three strongest hurricanes ever to make landfall in the Atlantic basin, according to The Weather Channel. (Read more ) ☼

New Scientific Findings Expose the Hoax Behind Meat Eating Climate Alarm

by Chris Morrison

Sensational new scientific findings have blown holes in the climate hoax opinion that humans need to give up eating meat to save the planet. The effect of methane (CH4), a minor ‘greenhouse’ gas, have been grossly exaggerated to suggest that animal farming poses a significant threat to the global climate. But the invented threat relies on multiplying by around ten the length of time that CH4 stays in the atmosphere – an invention under Global Warming Potential 100 know as GWP100 that is in widespread use in activist circles, including the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. At current emission levels, five Italian scientists predict 54% less warming than under GWP100, while small decreasing emissions, possible with some changes in animal diets, produce only tiny amounts of claimed warming. (Read more) ☼

Insurance Companies Are Making Record Profits Off Climate Change Panic, Not Facts

Climate-risk hype drives higher premiums even as insurers rake in cash.

by Roger Pielke Jr.

The headlines are relentless, loudly proclaiming that -climate-fueled extreme weather has caused an insurance crisis, reflected in dramatic rate increases for homeowners and businesses. Some warn that total economic collapse may soon follow. But as is often the case with apocalyptic warnings about climate change, real-world data don’t support the narrative. In reality, the insurance industry, which provides coverage related to hurricanes, fires, and other extreme events, is enjoying a streak of record profits. Defenders of high premiums say it’s because homes are much more expensive to insure due to climate change. But the recent spike in insurance prices is much more likely due, in significant part, to political requirements across the industry that financial companies consider “climate risk,” and the corresponding suite of risk modelers established to meet the newly -created demand. (Read more) ☼

Chill Out: Refrigerants Pose No Global Warming Threat

Biden EPA refrigerant rule hikes costs and risks with zero measurable climate benefit.

by Gregory Wrightstone

A federal rule mandating the use of certain refrigerants has substantially boosted the price of air conditioning and increased the risk of fire, only to reduce global temperature by an amount too small to measure.

Imposed by the Biden administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), beginning this year, the rule forced the replacement of a hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant known as R-410A with others that are less potent as greenhouse gases, which climate alarmists falsely claim will overheat Earth.

However, a report by the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia, calculated the atmospheric warming from continued use of R-410A at “0.044 degrees Celsius in 100 years, which is … absurdly small” and too little to be measured or felt.

The amount of warming averted by replacing the refrigerant with other greenhouse-gas hydrofluorocarbons was calculated to be an infinitesimal 0.03 degrees Celsius, according to the report titled “Chill Out: AC Refrigerants Cause Negligible Warming.”

Widely used in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems since 2010, R-410A was considered an economical, nonflammable refrigerant that posed less of a threat to damaging Earth’s ozone layer than hydrofluorocarbons it had replaced – itself a concern advanced by alarmists with dubious scientific support. It turns out that the chemicals replacing R-410A are more expensive and flammable, raising issues of both cost and safety. (Read more) ☼

Geological Heat, Not Climate, Drives Antarctica’s Vast And Hidden Freshwater System

by James Edward Kamis

One of Antarctica’s most amazing features is a hidden network of streams, rivers, and freshwater lakes beneath its ice sheet, stretching across the entire continent. All this water eventually flows downhill into the ocean. The presence of this hidden system beneath Antarctica’s two-mile-thick ice sheet is perhaps the most compelling evidence that geological forces shape nearly every aspect of the continent and its surrounding oceans. Many research studies confirm what has long been proposed: a liquid river and lake system exists beneath the entire Antarctic continent. The presence of this hidden water network carries significant implications for the validity of climate change theory. (Read more) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

by Jonathan DuHamel

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, the night side of the planet would freeze every night.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

New study shows that carbon dioxide is responsible for only seven percent of the greenhouse effect

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

America’s New Security Doctrine and the Reordering of Global Energy Geopolitics (Read article) ☼

How Wasteful is Green Energy? Count the Ways (link) ☼

Trump Admin Pauses Offshore Wind, Citing National Security Risks (link ) ☼

Newsom’s Man-Made Energy Crisis Drags California Toward Disaster

by Vince Fong

As California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom traveled to Brazil touting his failed energy agenda in mid-November, the reality back home is unavoidable: because of his policies, Californians are paying some of the highest gas and electricity prices in the nation.

We are being crushed by the Newsom energy affordability crisis — and it’s crippling our national security.

Since 2018, more than 360 energy companies have left California due to the state’s debilitating regulations, and new oil drilling permits have fallen by 95% since Newsom assumed office in 2019.

As a result, California has produced nearly 128,000 fewer barrels of oil per day over the past five years — despite holding the fifth-largest petroleum reserves in the country.

The undeniable consequence of Newsom’s refusal to support domestic production is a greater reliance on foreign oil. (Read more) ☼

Trump Opens Major Alaskan Minerals Mine That Biden Tried To Bury (Read story) ☼

Trove of Critical Minerals Uncovered in the Utah Desert

Mineral production company Ionic says it discovered 16 different rare earth and critical minerals that will help the U.S. compete with China

By Clara Hudson, Wall Street Journal

Ionic Mineral Technologies was mining the clay in Utah when it chanced upon what could be the critical mineral equivalent of a gold mine.

Ionic MT had leased the land as part of its business producing nanosilicon for lithium-ion batteries, which are used in electric vehicles. But the company told WSJ Pro Sustainable Business that what it found was a host of other minerals, in what it says may be the most significant critical mineral reserve in the U.S.

Ionic MT said it discovered high grades of 16 different types of minerals, everything from lithium to alumina, germanium, rubidium, cesium, vanadium and niobium at the site in Utah’s Silicon Ridge. (Read more) ☼

THE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY PROJECT REPORTS

[SEPP provides a weekly roundup of news available every Monday as The Week That Was (PDF) and reprinted as a blog post here as Weekly Climate and EnergyNews Roundup. Click on date for full reports.]

NOVEMBER 29:

Scope: This TWTW begins with a discussion of saturation physics by William Happer. TWTW then presents more evidence that this Solar Cycle may be hazardous for some types of electronic equipment. It then presents evidence that the UN COP movement may be unraveling. TWTW then presents comments by Roger Caiazza that the New York State plans for electricity may be unfeasible. TWTW concludes with a discussion of asbestos which was found in wind turbines in Australia.

Saturation physics explains why temperatures were not catastrophically high over the hundreds of millions of years when CO2 levels were 10 to nearly 20 times higher than they are today.

*********************

DECEMBER 6:

Scope: This TWTW begins with a discussion by Roy Spencer of maximum and minimum temperature trends in southern Canada. TWTW then discusses some proxies for CO2 concentrations and a retraction of a much-used paper. TWTW discusses what is meant by the statement that a model is verified and validated. TWTW concludes with the two views that the push for green energy is over and that it is not.

*********************

DECEMBER 13:

Scope: This TWTW begins with an essay by David Legates on the Greenhouse Effect. TWTW discusses a 2007 paper by Christopher Essex, Ross McKitrick, and Bjarne Andersen on the global temperature. Then, two papers by Net Zero Watch are presented one on human liberty, the other on powering human freedom. A Swiss magazine published an interview with SEPP director Willie Soon. TWTW discusses a paper by Charles Rotter and Anthony Watts that explains incorrect views concerning increased energy in the atmosphere from greenhouse gases. TWTW concludes with further discussion on the retraction of a significant paper in Nature.

*********************

DECEMBER 20:

Scope: This TWTW presents different views on the possible closing or reconfiguration of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). TWTW discusses a different view by David Legates of the retraction by the authors of a paper published in the journal Nature. TWTW presents new activities by the UN Environment Program (UNEP) and closes with a NOAA announcement of new weather models.

END

SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 NOVEMBER

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel

You may post comments at the end of this post or send them to [email protected]

“Without Freedom of Thought there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as Public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech” — Benjamin Franklin

“If socialists understood economics, they wouldn’t be socialists.” F. A. Hayek

Ten Years After the Paris Climate Agreement, Climatism is Crumbling

by Steve Goreham

In November, COP30, the United Nations climate conference, was held in Belem, Brazil. Thousands of representatives from all over the world have journeyed to discuss how to cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to try to fight human-caused climate change. But ten years after the Paris Climate Agreement, the global consensus on climate change is crumbling.

COP30 is the thirtieth “conference of the parties.” The first took place in Berlin in 1995. At COP21 in Paris in 2015, more than 190 countries signed the Paris Climate Agreement, pledging to cut emissions and to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

About 50,000 people are attending COP30 from more than 190 nations. But key world leaders are not attending, including President Xi Jinping of China, Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, and President Donald Trump of the United States. Climatism, the ideology pushing for a global transition to Net Zero energy, faces a rising tide of opposition across the world.

(Read more) ☼ [Note: To make travel from the airport to the host city easier, Brazil felled some 100,000 rainforest trees and committed worse scandals to build an oil-based asphalt highway.]

See also: “At COP30, Countries Sign First-ever Declaration to Control Info on Climate” (link) This means they intend to censor information they disagree with. ☼

COPs 1-30 – A perfect record of failure

by Anthony Watts

The farcical COP30 U.N. climate conference ends today (11-21-25). Looking back at 30 of these conferences, one thing is clear: there have been 30 COPs to date after the founding conference in Rio in 1992, and not one has reduced either global temperatures, carbon dioxide emissions, or sea level rise – or even slowed their trajectory. These COP conferences and the toothless agreements that flow from them are the supposed vehicles for planetary salvation. Based on the data, thus far, they have a perfect record of failure. (See more) ☼

Trump’s Eisenhower Moment: COP30 and the End of Europe’s Green Agenda

by Tilak Doshi

As the world’s climate delegations gather in Belém for COP30 (November 10th-21st), they do so under a very different geopolitical sky. The United States has withdrawn from the UN’s climate process altogether, and its diplomats have just led a successful rebellion at the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to block a global carbon tax on shipping. The episode marks not only a turning point for global climate policy but a moment of historical resonance. Europe’s effort to impose its moral and regulatory hegemony on the world has been checked by the US. As in 1956, when President Eisenhower forced his European allies to abort their attempt to take over the Suez Canal, Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” approach to energy policy in 2025 has re-asserted the primacy of national interest over imperial pretension. (Read more) ☼

How Trump’s DOE Just Nuked Biden’s Climate Bureaucracy Into Oblivion

Secretary Wright is scrapping Biden-era climate offices, trimming bureaucracy, and making energy affordable again.

by Teri Christoph

Secretary of Energy Chris Wright might possibly be the biggest unsung hero in the Trump 2.0 Cabinet. While his fellow Cabinet secretaries like Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth regularly get the big headlines, Wright flies a bit under the radar.

But that doesn’t mean he’s not busy taking bold, common-sense actions to push America toward policies that prioritize affordable, reliable, and secure energy sources.

Regular readers of RedState will know that Wright has been taking bold action to undo burdensome regulations and policies implemented by the Biden administration.

Our own Ward Clark has done a masterful job of logging Wright’s accomplishments, including the restoration of our nation’s depleted oil reserves, returning to the U.S. Treasury $13 billion in climate boondoggles, and embracing natural gas as an affordable energy source.

Wright is also busy undoing the administrative bloat that was added to his department during the Biden administration. (Read more) ☼

Reality Caught Up to ‘Climate Change’

The climate creed that once ruled unquestioned is cracking as energy needs, geopolitical reality, and basic science force the West to admit carbon isn’t dying anytime soon.

Article by Victor Davis Hanson (Read article) ☼

See also: Why COP30 Is Just Another Climate Hypocrites Jamboree (link)☼

New satellite study reveals a widespread transition zone in the sky, challenging climate models

A new study published in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences has shed light on a previously overlooked but common atmospheric phenomenon: the transition zone (TZ) where clouds and aerosols blend together, making it difficult to tell where one ends and the other begins. These conditions in the sky are more prevalent than previously thought and could be a key to reducing uncertainty in future climate projections.

Clouds and aerosols (tiny suspended particles in the air) are critical players in regulating Earth’s temperature, but they remain one of the largest sources of uncertainty in climate models. Traditionally, scientists have classified atmospheric layers as either cloud or aerosol. However, this new research confirms that the real atmosphere is not so binary, often featuring a gradual transition filled with features like wispy cloud fragments or hydrated aerosols that defy simple classification. (Read more) ☼

Another “Model-Based” Methane Scare Story: Why It Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny

byAnthony Watts

Once again, the headlines scream “Worse than we thought.” This time, it’s methane—specifically from lakes and reservoirs—that’s being cast as the next great climate villain. According to a new study from Linköping University in Sweden and NASA Ames Research Center, methane emissions from inland waters could “double by the end of the century” and “exacerbate the IPCC’s worst-case climate scenario”. It sounds dire—until you take a closer look. (Read more) ☼

A Scientist’s Stand Against Ideological Capture – Review of “Why I Cut Ties with Science’s Top Publisher”

by Anthony Watts

In an age when far too many scientists keep their heads down and their concerns to themselves, scientist Anna Krylov has done something refreshing: she has spoken plainly, publicly, and with precision. Her recent article, “Why I Cut Ties with Science’s Top Publisher,” is a clear-eyed examination of how one of the world’s most prestigious scientific publishers, Nature Portfolio, has drifted from the pursuit of truth toward the pursuit of ideology. Her piece is not only courageous—it’s badly needed. At Watts Up With That, we have long argued that once scientific journals begin valuing political narratives over empirical rigor, the entire purpose of scientific publishing is compromised. In a succinct “we told you so” op-ed, Krylov has now offered a firsthand account that illustrates exactly how that corruption unfolds in practice. (Read more) ☼

The Guardian and Guterres Are Wrong: Science Shows No Climate ‘Tipping Points’

by Linnea Lueken

A recent article in The Guardian, “Change course now: humanity has missed 1.5C climate target, says UN head,” claims that the planet is in grave danger of passing climate “tipping points,” as it is now inevitable that 1.5°C warming will be breached. Although 1.5? of warming may be locked in if not already surpassed, the claim that it signifies a dangerous milestone is false. Not only is the tipping points narrative bunk, but there is no evidence that 1.5°C warming is any particular threat. The purported temperature threshhold was chosen arbitrarily and for political reasons rather than scientific ones. (Read more) ☼

New Study: Great Barrier Reef Coral Cover ‘At Its Highest Since Monitoring Began In 1985’

by Kenneth Richard

Another alarmist narrative debunked by observations.

Coral coverage was supposed to be existentially devastated by the modern tenths-of-a-degree increases in sea surface temperatures and recurring bleaching events.

However, a new study points to assessments of coral cover percentages in the Great Barrier Reef and concludes is “at its highest since monitoring began in 1985.” Further, the analysis reveals there is “no consistent correlation between rising temperatures and reduced coral cover,” and that “most corals [are] demonstrating rapid recovery” from bleaching. (Read more) ☼

Trends In Ocean Heat Uptake, Thermal Expansion Challenge Human Forcing Claims

by Kenneth Richard

Fundamental assumptions in projections of alarming, CO2-induced global warming in the coming decades are undermined by a new long-term energy budget analysis.

In a new study scientists have acknowledged the modeled assumptions forecasting nature’s response to the presumed human-driven radiative forcing of ocean heat uptake, thermal expansion, and sea level rise rates do not align well with observations from recent decades. (Read more) ☼

Real Public Health Threats vs. Climate Hysteria

by Gregory Wrightstone

Relying on human ingenuity to coexist with a changing climate – either warmer or cooler – and tending to long-recognized public health threats are the best ways to ensure the well-being of the planet and its inhabitants, according to an Australian physician and expert in climate and public health.

“The ingenuity of Homo sapiens at adapting to climate has permitted people to populate almost the entire globe from the freezing Arctic to the steamy tropics, notes Dr. D. Weston Allen, lead author of a paper supporting a proposed repeal of a federal designation of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a pollutant. “If we stick to doing what we do best – adaptation – we will continue to thrive.”

Dr. Allen says that civilizations did well in past eras of relative warmth during Minoan and Roman times and the Medieval Warm Period. And, he says, cool periods often brought suffering, the most recent being the Little Ice Age, which experienced “frequent widespread crop failures, mass starvation, disease and depopulation.”

“The Black Death of 1346-1353 wiped out 30%-60% of Europe’s population and up to 200 million people across Eurasia,” he writes.

However, natural change in the climate and industrialization that spread in the 1800s and accelerated in the 20th century fostered unprecedented prosperity and health. (Read more) ☼

Why Another Carrington-Class Event Should Scare You

by Dr. Matthew Wielicki

A few days of solar fireworks were all it took to remind us of a basic truth: the universe is not a friendly place

During the recent severe solar storms, auroras spilled far beyond their usual Arctic haunts, glowing over much of Europe and the continental United States, with displays reported as far south as Florida and the U.S. Southwest.

Here in Colorado, the sky looked like it had been hacked… bands of red, purple, and green flickering overhead while most people scrolled past the headlines about “pretty northern lights.”

But behind that beauty is a blunt reality: we live on a small rock orbiting a variable star that occasionally hurls billion-ton clouds of plasma at us at a million kilometers per hour (that’s over 600,000 miles per hour). We pour trillions into so-called ‘climate change’ while doing comparatively little to harden our societies against solar storms, super-eruptions, or asteroid impacts… events that will happen again, regardless of how many heat pumps we install.

This piece is about one of those real threats: solar storms. (Read more) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

by Jonathan DuHamel

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, the night side of the planet would freeze every night.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

New study shows that carbon dioxide is responsible for only seven percent of the greenhouse effect

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

New Study Sheds Light On How Many Have Suffered Due To Foolish Green Policies

by Vijay Jayaraj

A new report from McKinsey & Company, the “Global Energy Perspective,” lays bare what many of us – dismissed as “climate deniers” – have been asserting all along: Coal, oil and natural gas will continue to be the dominant sources of global energy well past 2050.  (Read more) ☼

Refuting the idea that Weather-Dependent Renewables are much cheaper than Conventional power generation (Read article) ☼

Shock New Report Lays Out the Full Scale of Environmental Damage Caused by Onshore Wind Turbines

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

by Chris Morrison

Fresh insights into the ecological devastation caused by onshore wind turbines around the world are contained in a shocking new paper published last month by a group of ecologists in Nature. The paper is paywalled and has attracted little mainstream media interest, but it highlights research that illustrates that the effect of utility-scale wind energy production “can be far reaching and sometimes have large and unexpected consequences for biodiversity”. An annual figure of around one million bats are killed in the countries with the highest number of turbines, but harmful effects are seen in many other parts of the ecosystem. The number of top predators such as jaguars, jungle cats and golden jackals can be changed by turbines in tropical forest gaps leading to the “possibility for cascading effects” along similar latitudinal levels.

In short, the science team notes that turbines can kill birds, bats and insects, change animal behaviour, physiology and demography and alter ecosystems. The installation of wind turbines invariably results in habitat degradation, but it is regions rich in biodiversity with minimal existing infrastructure that suffer the most. The authors state that wind facilities “are recognised as an important driver for losses and degradation of irreplaceable habitats that are important for conservation.” Such areas, of course, can be found in the windy highlands of Scotland. For City-dwelling eco zealots, it is a case of out of sight, out of mind. Net Zero is all about money and power – bats and eagles have neither. (Read more) ☼

Fossil Fuel Demand Climbs As Green Transition Stalls

The need for hydrocarbons keeps rising despite climate targets and green energy promises.

by Pierre Gosselin

Blackout News reports that despite ambitious international climate targets and the promise of a rapid energy transition, we are witnessing a paradoxical development: Global demand for fossil fuels has not fallen, but continues to increase.The world economy’s growing hunger for energy directly clashes with political expectations, and the so-called “peak demand” for oil and gas, once predicted by experts, is currently not in sight. (Read more) ☼

Unlocking America’s Rare Earth Riches Could Finally Break China’s Grip On Minerals

Trillions in strategic minerals lie beneath U.S. soil, yet bureaucrats and activist antics keep them off-limits. by Paul Driessen, guest post (Read article) ☼

New Arctic discovery could deal massive blow to Chinese dominance of rare earth minerals

by Charles Creitz, Fox News

A project heralded by Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy and accelerated by President Donald Trump stands to deal a huge blow to China’s dominance in the nanotechnology, energy and automotive sectors as the GraphiteOne site near Nome uncovered vast reserves — for which Beijing previously accounted for 90% of production. (Read more) ☼

The Latest Political Scam — “Affordability” — Is Really Taking Off by Francis Menton (Read article) ☼

THE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY PROJECT REPORTS

[SEPP provides a weekly roundup of news available every Monday as The Week That Was (PDF) and reprinted as a blog post here as Weekly Climate and EnergyNews Roundup. Click on date for full reports.]

NOVEMBER 1:

Scope: This TWTW begins with heretical thoughts by Freeman Dyson. TWTW continues with part of the transcript from an interview of Richard Lindzen and William Happer by Joe Rogan. Then TWTW discusses “The State of the Climate, 2024” by Ole Humlum. *********************

Heretical Thoughts: Writing in WUWT, Eric Worrall:

My first heresy says that all the fuss about global warming is grossly exaggerated. Here I am opposing the holy brotherhood of climate model experts and the crowd of deluded citizens who believe the numbers predicted by the computer models. Of course, they say, I have no degree in meteorology, and I am therefore not qualified to speak. But I have studied the climate models, and I know what they can do. The models solve the equations of fluid dynamics, and they do a very good job of describing the fluid motions of the atmosphere and the oceans. They do a very poor job of describing the clouds, the dust, the chemistry and the biology of fields, farms, and forests. They do not begin to describe the real world that we live in. The real world is muddy and messy and full of things that we do not yet understand. It is much easier for a scientist to sit in an air-conditioned building and run computer models, than to put on winter clothes and measure what is really happening outside in the swamps and the clouds. That is why the climate model experts end up believing their own models.’

The global climate system represents a multifaceted system, involving sun, planets, atmosphere, oceans, land, geological processes, biological life, and the complex relationships between them. Many components and their interactions are still not fully understood, or perhaps not even recognized. Among all these influences, human CO2 emissions have in all probability only contributed modestly to the current warming. In fact, believing that one minor constituent of the atmosphere (CO2) controls nearly all aspects of climate is amazingly naïve and entirely unrealistic.

The global climate has remained in a stable condition within certain limits for millions of years, although with important variations playing out over periods ranging from years to centuries, or more, but the global climate has never been in a fully stable state without change. Modern observations show that this normal behavior is also characterizing recent years, including 2024, and there is no observational evidence for any global climate crisis. Our world should consider focusing on much more pressing problems.

NOVEMBER 8:

Scope: This TWTW begins with a continuation of the interview of Richard Lindzen and William Happer by Joe Rogan, emphasizing the problems of climate modeling. TWTW discusses claims made by The Lancet regarding weather events which are contradicted by physical evidence. It then gives an example of how slightly false claims snowball into major false claims. TWTW concludes with a surprise announcement by Bill Gates.

NOVEMBER 15:

Scope: This TWTW begins with a discussion of false precision by Ivor Williams. Then TWTW presents an essay by Meteorologist Anthony Sadar on how ignorance is used to spread fear of climate change. TWTW offers further thoughts on why some people change their thinking about climate change, what is meant by tipping points, and issues regarding COP-30. This TWTW concludes with Bjorn Lomborg’s view of the “green transition” in China.

*********************

NOVEMBER 22:

Scope: This TWTW begins with an essay by SEPP director David Legates rebutting a claim that today’s complex global climate models accurately forecast climate. TWTW discusses a version of uncertainty proposed by John Ridgway. TWTW discusses Ross McKitrick’s paper of a statistically acceptable way of climate fingerprinting. Then, TWTW discusses an essay and a speech by two commentators on UK energy policy. TWTW closes with an effort by the UNFCCC to impose censorship.

First, we need to get one fact correct. The recent Department of Energy report did not simply cite the complexity of climate models as the primary reason they cannot be trusted. It goes into detail as to why current climate models cannot be trusted: namely, they cannot reproduce current conditions.

*********************

END

SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 OCTOBER

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel

You may post comments at the end of this post or send them to [email protected]

This month I present more physical evidence that natural processes, rather than carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels, are the main drivers of Earth’s climate. We will also look at how more sensible energy policy is beneficial.

Dr. Henrik Svensmark: Sun and Cosmic Rays Drive Climate, Not CO2 (Read more) ☼

U.S. Heat Records Show 1930s Still Hottest

by Anthony Watts

As detailed in Climate at a Glance: The Facts on Climate Change (2nd Edition, 2025), “the all-time high temperature records set in most states occurred in the first half of the twentieth century, decades before anyone was talking about human-caused climate change.”

The 1930s remain the standout decade for heat in the American record. Data, drawn from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) U.S. Historical Climatology Network, show that both the number and intensity of heat waves peaked during that period. (Read more) ☼

New Study Attributes Arctic Sea Ice Decline – And ‘Slowdown’ Since 2012 -To Internal Variability

by Kenneth Richard

“Observations show no significant decline in Arctic sea ice concentration (SIC) since 2012…revealing a negligible trend of -0.4% per decade…” – Wang et al., 2025

Scientists are now acknowledging the sharply declining trend in Arctic sea ice from the mid-1990s to 2010s (-11.3% per decade), as well as the “negligible” or flat trend since 2012 (-0.4% per decade) are both “closely coupled” with natural decadal-scale variations in the North Atlantic Oscillation, the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscilliation, and “enhanced summertime radiation balance associated with an anticyclonic atmospheric circulation pattern.”

In other words, instead of a linear decline in Arctic sea ice coupled with rising greenhouse gas emissions, it is claimed that “approximately half” of the observed Arctic sea ice decline in the modern era can be attributed to internal variability.

The authors of this new study published in Nature Communications further suggest the flattened trend or “slowdown” in sea ice decline will likely persist for the next 10 to 15 years. Consequently, alarmist predictions of an “ice-free” Arctic in the coming decades will have to be put on hold until after the 2030s. (Read more) ☼

How Geological Heat Powers Greenland’s Vast Subglacial Rivers And Lakes

Intense geothermal heat behind Greenland’s vast network of hidden rivers and lakes beneath its ice.

by James Edward Kamis

Research shows that most, if not all, of Greenland is underlain by an actively flowing, interconnected network of subglacial streams, rivers, and lakes. This network spans roughly 900,000 square miles and appears to have been formed—and maintained—by intense heat flow from a variety of subglacial geological features, most prominently the faults of the Central Valley Fault and Rift System.

The volume of meltwater exiting Greenland’s ice sheet through its marginal rivers is immense—far exceeding what could be explained by atmospheric warming alone. This strongly indicates that widespread geothermal heat from the bedrock beneath the ice sheet’s interior plays a major role in driving basal melting. (Read more) ☼

The Amazon’s “CO2 Problem”? Turns Out the Trees Love It – So Does the Media

by Anthony Watts

For decades, we’ve been warned that the Amazon rainforest—the so-called “lungs of the planet”—was on the verge of collapse. Headlines screamed about tipping points, mass die-offs of giant trees, and irreversible climate catastrophe. Yet, buried in the data, something rather inconvenient has been happening: the Amazon is getting bigger, fatter, and taller.

A new Nature Plants study, covering 30 years of field data from 188 permanent forest plots across Amazonia, shows that the average size of Amazon trees has increased by more than 3% per decade . In plain English: the forest isn’t shrinking in stature, it’s bulking up. This is the CO2 fertilization effect in action. (Read more) ☼

New ‘Climate at a Glance’ Book Challenges ‘Climate Crisis’ Narrative with Hard Data

From THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE

The Heartland Institute has published a second edition of its Amazon best-selling book Climate at a Glance. The new book, Climate at a Glance (Second Edition): Facts on 40 Prominent Climate Topics, is available now on Amazon.

The 118-page book covers 40 climate topics often discussed in science classes, as well as among the general public and media, and provides the data to show the earth is not experiencing a climate crisis. The book is organized into four sections: (1) Extreme Weather, (2) Economics and Policy, (3) Climate Change Impacts, and (4) Underlying Science. This makes it ideal as a tool for teachers to bring the latest climate data into their lesson plans. (Read more) ☼

Paper Chase: A Global Industry Fuels Scientific Fraud in the U.S.

by Vince Bielski

In southern India, a new enterprise called Peer Publicon Consultancy offers a full suite of services to scientific researchers. It will not only write a scholarly paper for a fee but also guarantee publishing the fraudulent work in a respected journal.

It is one of many “paper mills” that have emerged across Asia and Eastern Europe over the last two decades. Paper mills are having remarkable success peddling tens of thousands of bogus academic journal papers and authorships to university and medical researchers seeking to pad their resumes in highly competitive fields.

These sophisticated outfits also engage in trickery to get papers published, infiltrating journals with their own editors and reviewers and even resorting to bribery, according to investigators and a white paper from Wiley, a New Jersey-based publisher. The scale of the fraud is eye-popping: One Wiley subsidiary, Hindawi, retracted more than 8,000 articles two years ago for suspected paper mill involvement.

U.S. universities and regulators have been able to brush off the threat of paper mills because they have mostly sold their services in China, where research integrity standards are rarely enforced, according to experts. But these rogue operators are building on their success in Asia and expanding to the U.S. and Western Europe, where the prize is the prestige of naming an author on an article from a famous university. (Read more) ☼

Does conventional climate science threaten civilization? – ‘Error-riddled computer models that back doomsday predictions violate core tenets of scientific methodology’

by Vijay Jayaraj

Practitioners of rigorous scientific methodology — from the 17th century’s Galileo to 1965’s winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics, Richard Feynman — would consider today’s climate research an embarrassment, shaped by uncritical orthodoxy and zealotry rather than genuine testing of hypotheses.

Classical science welcomes skepticism. It thrives in an environment where debate and revision are encouraged. Today’s climate conformists declare the debate “settled” and label those with questions as deniers, effectively outlawing the skepticism that drives scientific progress.

Plenty of 21st-century scientists have objected to this travesty. Dr. Matthew Wielicki, formerly of the University of Alabama, put it bluntly: “Science should be self-correcting. Climate science isn’t. It’s self-preserving.”

Dr. Richard Lindzen of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology notes that climate dogma has little to do with evidence: “The narrative is a quasi-religious movement predicated on an absurd scientific narrative.”

In essence, modern climate science has been transformed into a political apparatus dominated by campaign-style advocacy, subverting the foundational principles of evidence-based inquiry.

Climate cultists treat every warming or cooling event as anthropogenic by default, ignoring millennia of natural variation. “While substantial concern has been expressed that emissions may cause significant climate change, measured or reconstructed temperature records indicate that 20th- and 21st-century climate changes are neither exceptional nor persistent, and the historical and geological records show many periods warmer than today,” say scientists writing to the American Physics Society.

Gregory Wrightstone, geologist and best-selling author of A Very Convenient Warming, says that the longer geological record reveals numerous epochs with much higher temperatures and levels of atmospheric CO2, all predating the influence of modern human activity.

Wrightstone rejects descriptions of current conditions as dangerous, saying that “Earth is growing greener, and temperature-related deaths are declining.” The evidence indicates the planet is not imperiled but flourishing.

Deaths from natural disasters are at historic lows, life expectancy continues to climb, and global crop yields in both advanced and developing economies are at record highs. Rising atmospheric CO2 is associated with improved plant growth, not planetary degradation.

The much-hyped “disappearing islands” of the Pacific continue to exist. Many atolls have grown in size due to coral and sediment accumulation. Arctic sea ice, too, has refused to vanish; the 2025 minimum extent is nearly half a million square kilometers larger than 2007.

Yet none of these realities make it into school textbooks or U.N. briefings. The crisis narrative is perpetuated to sustain a trillion-dollar “green” industry dependent on fear, political support and publicly financed subsidies.

Error-riddled computer models that back doomsday predictions violate core tenets of scientific methodology. When tested against known outcomes, they routinely fail. (Source) ☼

Antarctic Amundsen-Scott Station Sees Coldest October in 44 Years…Mainstream Media Silent!

by P Gosselin

This is not supposed to be happening, according to the climate models.

While the headlines relentlessly holler about “exploding global warming” and “dramatic melting” of the polar caps, the South Pole is telling a starkly different story.

On October 15, the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station registered an astonishing temperature of minus 61.3 degrees Celsius and it isn’t even winter there. It’s springtime and temperatures should be on the rise. According to Report 24, the numbers are clear: It was the coldest October measured at the station since 1981. (Read more) ☼

17 Republican AGs Urge Trump Admin To Skip COP30 Over Green Energy Policies

AGs say attending COP30 would endorse costly renewables and threaten energy security.

by Audrey Streb

“Sitting out the COP-30 conference sends a strong message that America will no longer be part of the green new scam. Renewables are not reliable and are expensive – just look at California – but yet, this gathering will continue to push these climate initiatives with their grandiose declarations, while ignoring reality,” McCuskey told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “In this country, we finally have an administration taking bold action to secure the Nation’s energy interests by investing in traditional fuels and undoing harmful regulations. Skipping COP-30 signals that America will pursue energy policies based on what provides the most affordable and reliable energy to the American people, not international pressure.” (Read more) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

by Jonathan DuHamel

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, the night side of the planet would freeze every night.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

New study shows that carbon dioxide is responsible for only seven percent of the greenhouse effect

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

America’s Energy Dilemma: A Consumer’s Guide to Common Sense

by Terry L. Headley

The Great American Paradox

When Americans walk into a store, they instinctively know how to make a choice. They weigh quality, price, reliability, and long-term value. Whether it’s a car, a home appliance, or a pair of boots, the decision isn’t ideological—it’s practical. People want something that works, lasts, and doesn’t cost a fortune to maintain.

Energy, though invisible and abstract, should be treated the same way. Every kilowatt-hour that lights a lamp or powers a furnace comes from a decision about trade-offs—cost, reliability, safety, and sustainability. Yet somewhere along the way, that simple consumer logic was replaced by political fashion and media spin. Americans who would never buy a fragile car or a house built on sand have been persuaded to accept an energy system that depends on the weather.

If America approached its national energy policy the way a family buys a truck—asking, “Will this get the job done, in every season, under every condition?”—the answer would still be coal. It’s not sentimental nostalgia; it’s arithmetic and common sense. Coal delivers what every smart buyer demands: power when you need it, at a price you can afford, for as long as you need it.

So let’s walk through that decision step by step—as if the buyer were America herself, standing on the lot, comparing what works to what merely looks good. (Read more) ☼

The US Can Break Free From China’s Control of Rare Earth Minerals

by Helen Raleigh

President Donald Trump has recently signaled his intent to impose an additional 100% tariff on Chinese goods due to Beijing’s sweeping restrictions on rare earth minerals. This escalation highlights that the trade conflict between these two nations is far from settled.

At the heart of the current dispute are rare earth minerals—a crucial group of 17 elements vital to our digital economy and national security. They are indispensable in everything from electric vehicles to smartphones to fighter jets and missiles. The Chinese Communist Party has aggressively pursued dominance in this market, using substantial financial subsidies and often neglecting the significant environmental impacts associated with mining and processing. Consequently, China now commands nearly 70% of global rare earth production and processes around 90% of the world’s rare earth elements.

Despite what the name implies, most rare earth elements are not actually rare in nature. The United States once led the world in the production of rare earth minerals, utilizing both its technological capabilities and rich deposits to dominate the market. However, increasingly stringent environmental regulations raised operational and compliance costs for American mining companies. As a result, many were unable to compete with low-cost Chinese competitors and exited the sector entirely. This shift has left American businesses dependent on rare earth supplies vulnerable to the whims of the Chinese Communist Party, placing both our economy and national security in jeopardy.

After Trump’s tariff announcement early this year, China retaliated by delaying the approval of export licenses for these crucial minerals. The resulting supply shortage led some U.S. automakers to temporarily shut down select electric and hybrid vehicle production lines. This demonstrates that the Chinese Communist Party will not hesitate to turn China’s dominance of the rare earth supply chain into a formidable economic and geopolitical weapon. (Read more) ☼

(See also: Trump Moves To Break Communist China’s Grip On Rare Earth Minerals [link])

Together, Power Plants and Greenhouses Can Feed Humanity.

by Ronald Stein, P.E. and Sid Abma

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and datacenters are coming and so are the natural gas power plants that will be required to provide continuous uninterruptible electricity to power a lot of these facilities. These power plants today can operate at well over 90% Energy Efficiency.

The natural gas power plant that has produced electricity can further benefit humanity via the waste exhaust that would normally be put into a chimney and vented into the atmosphere, which is a waste of heat and a waste of CO2.

Rather than exhausting hot gases up power plants chimneys, the exhaust can be utilized in greenhouses, typically through a cogeneration system. The recovered heat energy can be used to warm greenhouses, and the CO2 fertilizes the plants, and all contributes to feeding the world’s population. (Read more) ☼

Federal Judge Rules Biden’s Massive Offshore Oil And Gas Ban Was Illegal

The decision overturns Biden’s attempt to block drilling across 625 million acres of U.S. offshore waters. (Read more) ☼

Green Energy’s High Price: Wind Farms Are Ravaging Nature, Biodiversity

by P Gosselin

Wind farms are often celebrated as the glowing symbol of the energy transition—clean, renewable, and future-proof. But behind this “green” lies an underestimated chain of destruction causing extensive, possibly irreversible damage to our ecosystems. Recent research indicates that the true cost of wind energy is far higher than generally acknowledged, paid directly and painfully by nature. (Read more) ☼

Transportation Dept. takes more wind out of offshore wind

by Craig Rucker

The Department of Transportation recently scuttled $679 million in federal funding for coastal port projects intended to support the heavily subsidized offshore wind industry. The money will instead be used for much-needed traditional infrastructure and shipbuilding.

It’s a tiny fraction of the tens of billions spent or committed to wind and solar energy projects. But the cuts reinforce President Trump’s determination to end federal funding for this expensive form of electricity from offshore turbines that generate power only 35 to 40 percent of the time.

(Read more) ☼

“New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.”— Max Planck

“We can judge our progress by the courage of our questions and the depth of our answers, our willingness to embrace what is true rather than what feels good.”— Carl Sagan

END

SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 SEPTEMBER

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel

You may post comments at the end of this post or send them to [email protected]

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel

You may post comments at the end of this post or send them to [email protected]

This issue shows how climate politics have been wrong.

“Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels…If it is consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus.”— Michael Crichton

“The right to search for truth implies also a duty; one must not conceal any part of what one has recognized to be true.” — Albert Einstein

The Hottest Summer Days in the U.S. Have Barely Warmed in the Last 40 Years

by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

The total warming of the hottest 3 days in each summer month averaged across 400 mostly-airport weather stations is only 1.2 deg. F over 40 years. (Read more) ☼

Modern Warmth Is Merely Part Of A Natural Cycle

by Kenneth Richard

Throughout the last 10,000 years there have globally been much warmer and more extensive iceless periods than observed in the modern era.

“There is reliable geological evidence that the temperature of most warming phases in the Holocene were globally higher or similar to that of the current warming period, Arctic sea ice was less extensive, and most mountain glaciers in the northern hemisphere either disappeared or were smaller.”

Cold periods – like warm periods – are driven by natural solar forcing mechanisms. The last of which was manifested in the 19th century.

“A solar forcing mechanism has steered Holocene climate change, expressed by 9 cooling phases known as Bond events.”

The recent warming is part of a natural cycle, not a consequence of human activity.

“The modern warming is part of a climatic cycle with a progressive warming after the Little Ice Age, the last cold episode of which occurred at the beginning of the 19th century.”

There is thus nothing unprecedented or even unusual about the modern climate state. Any claims to the contrary are “not supported by the geological data.” (Read more) ☼

New Study: ‘CO2 Does Not Precede Temperature, Nor Does It Control Temperature’

by Kenneth Richard

More evidence is unleashed undermining the CO2-drives-climate narrative.

A comprehensive correlation analysis (Grabyan, 2025) utilizing the last 2000 years of temperature and CO2 data affirms CO2 changes lag temperature changes by ~150 years throughout the 1 to 1850 C.E. era.

This Common Era (C.E.) lead-lag sequencing – with temperature changes leading and CO2 changes lagging by centuries to millennia – is wholly consistent with the paleo CO2 and temperature proxy (ice core, stomata, borehole, etc.) record spanning the last 20,000 years.

It is notable that the CO2 changes can be shown to be driven by temperature changes over not only the long-term (centuries), but over short-term periods (months, years) as well (Koutsoyiannis et al., 2023, Humlum et al., 2013). (Read more) ☼

Study Finds Climate Change Not Driving ‘Accelerated’ Sea Level Rise, Upending IPCC Models

by Anthony Blair

Global sea levels have not continued to rise at the rates predicted by many scientists — and there is no evidence that climate change has contributed to any such acceleration, a new first-of-its-kind study has claimed. The research found that the average sea level rise in 2020 was only around 1.5mm per year, or 6 inches per century, according to the paper’s authors, Dutch engineering consultant Hessel Voortman and independent researcher Rob de Vos.

“This is significantly lower than the 3 to 4 mm/year often reported by climate scientists in scientific literature and the media,” Voortman told independent journalist Michael Shellenberger. Voortman was shocked that no researcher had performed an analysis of real-world local data before. (Read more) ☼

Island Nations Are Growing, Not ‘Sinking Into The Sea’, Debunking The Independent’s Climate Scare

by H. Sterling Burnett

The Independent posted an article claiming multiple small island nations are sinking into the sea, threatening to cease existing as nations, leaving their populations adrift. Data shows this is simply false. Amid modest sea level rise, the island nations that The Independent discusses have increased in size, population, and prosperity amid modest climate change. No real data shows that the oceans are about to swamp these countries. (Read more) ☼

See also my blog posts: The Sea Level Scam and Tuvalu and other Pacific islands resist sea level rise and add land area ☼

The Carbon Credit Climate Con

Climate cult exposed: ESG darling busted in phony carbon credit scam.

by Brian Mark Webe

The climate change cult has produced a lot of misinformation, plenty of scare tactics, and years of pledges and policies by governments, none of which have done anything to impact the environment or the climate. Add carbon credits to the list of “feel-good” approaches that have largely turned out to be scams. (Read more) ☼

The Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Gains Again Exceed Mass Losses In 2024-’25 (Read more) ☼

Media Falsely Claim Antarctica On Brink Of Climate Doom, Ignore Contrary Data

by Anthony Watts and H. Sterling Burnett

A recent CBS News article, “Abrupt Antarctic climate shifts could lead to ‘catastrophic consequences for generations,’ experts warn,” claims that Antarctica is on the brink of irreversible collapse due to climate change, warning that sea levels could rise by meters and that “catastrophic consequences for generations” are looming. This is false or, at best, deeply misleading. The actual data and history of Antarctic ice show that “abrupt changes” are neither unprecedented nor a reason to panic. Natural variability and cyclical shifts are being ignored in favor of sensational headlines pushing the increasingly untenable climate crisis narrative. (Read more) ☼

Another New Study Suggests Most – 80% – Of The Modern CO2 Increase Has Been Natural

by Kenneth Richard

CO2 concentration increases are not the cause of rising temperature, but an effect of rising temperature. An independent researcher (Robbins, 2025) has reviewed recent research that suggests at least “80% or more of the [modern CO2] increase is of natural origin.”

This is because “changes in atmospheric temperature are an ‘effect’ of changes in Sea Surface Temperatures and not a ’cause’ as some might advocate.” (Read more) ☼

National Academies Go Preposterous on CO2

by David Wojick

You would think the National Academy of Sciences understands science, but you would be wrong. Their President just approved a report the conclusion of which is scientifically impossible! (Read more) ☼

Late summer Arctic sea ice extent has remained steady for almost 2 decades.

by P Gosselin

In the late 2000s, experts and climate bedwetters, like Al Gore – warned the late summer Arctic sea ice would disappear already by 2015. That prediction has yet to even come anywhere near close to happening. According to the US National Snow and Ice data Center (NSIDC) at the University of Colorado Boulder, the Arctic sea ice melt this year has long reached its low point, falling to 4.602 million square kilometers on September 10th.

Compared to the record low of 3.387 million square kilometers that occurred 13 years ago, 2012, this year’s value is more than 1.2 million square kilometers greater, and nearly half a million square kilometers more than 2007 (4.155 million square kilometers.).

Overall, Arctic late summer sea ice trend has been flat for nearly 2 decades, defying the global warming trend prediction that it would melt to almost nothing by now. The alarmists have been completely wrong. (Read more) ☼

Trump DOE Halting Taxpayer Billions From Going Down The ‘Green New Scam’ Drain

The Trump admin is moving to reclaim billions in unspent Biden-era energy subsidies.

by Thomas Richard

The DOE announced Wednesday that it is working to return $13 billion in unobligated funds to the treasury as part of the Trump administration’s goal to “halt wasteful spending and refocus the department to its core mission.” (Read more) ☼

Do not renew Renewable Fuel Standard

by Sam Raus

Twenty years ago, Al Gore and climate activism were all the rage. As a part of trendy new efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, lawmakers established the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requiring a certain minimum amount of renewable fuels to be blended into the nation’s transportation fuel supply every year.

Washington promised the standard would reduce emissions and protect the environment. In reality, the RFS distorts the energy market by favoring certain “green” sources over others. It guarantees biofuels like ethanol make up a minimum share of the energy sector, leaving American oil and gas companies fighting it out for the rest.

Americans don’t have any more time for these political games in the marketplace. They need more and more energy — to run their homes, to drive to the office, and to work their jobs. The economy is digitizing, as Americans work faster and harder than ever before. New technologies like artificial intelligence promise to massively boost productivity. But all these platforms use vastly greater amounts of electricity than ever before. And prices are rising, with electric bills up 5.5% and natural gas up 13.8%.

The Trump administration has already taken substantial efforts to lower energy costs — from the One Big Beautiful Bill ending corrupt solar and wind subsidies and the gasoline-mileage rules to the Department of Energy slashing regulatory hurdles. Now is the time for them to take the axe to one of the biggest inhibitors to cheaper gas prices. It’s time to end the RFS.

For too long, Washington has forced families to pay more every time they fill up their tanks. The Renewable Fuel Standard isn’t helping anyone at the pump — it’s just another politicized subsidy that drives up costs and makes life harder. Americans don’t need more mandates, they need affordable gas and reliable power. (Read more) ☼

California’s $2.2B Solar Plant Closing Over Tech Failures, Costs, And Wildlife Deaths

by Paul Bois

A solar energy plant in California that cost $2.2 billion to build will be shutting down after failing to meet expectations.

Known as the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility in California’s Mojave Desert, the famed solar farm uses 173,500 computer-controlled mirrors called heliostats to reflect sunlight onto three 459-foot towers to generate electricity from the intense heat.

“The idea was that you could use the sun to produce a heat source,” alternative energy consultant Edward Smeloff told the New York Post. “The mirrors reflect heat from the sun up to a receiver, which is mounted on top of the tower. That heats a fluid. It creates steam [that spins] a conventional steam turbine. It is complicated.”

After nearly 11 years in operation, the solar plant failed to meet expectations, and the technology used is now largely viewed as outdated by green energy experts.

The plant has also become an environmental hazard, with the Association of Avian Veterinarians noting that it “is believed to be responsible for at least 6,000 bird deaths each year.” (Read more) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, the night side of the planet would freeze every night.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

New study shows that carbon dioxide is responsible for only seven percent of the greenhouse effect

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

 

END

SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 AUGUST

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel

You may post comments at the end of this post or send them to [email protected]

This issue presents several new papers which show that carbon dioxide has very little, if any, effect on climate. Thus, the so-called “Net Zero” campaign has no basis in science and will have many bad effects on economies and our way of life.

We begin with:

A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate

This 151-page report from the Department of Energy puts some reality into the climate controversy. Read the full report here.

Executive Summary:

This report reviews scientific certainties and uncertainties in how anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gas emissions have affected, or will affect, the Nation’s climate, extreme weather events, and selected metrics of societal well-being. Those emissions are increasing the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere through a complex and variable carbon cycle, where some portion of the additional CO2 persists in the atmosphere for centuries.

Elevated concentrations of CO2 directly enhance plant growth, globally contributing to “greening” the planet and increasing agricultural productivity [Section 2.1, Chapter 9]. They also make the oceans less alkaline (lower the pH). That is possibly detrimental to coral reefs, although the recent rebound of the Great Barrier Reef suggests otherwise [Section 2.2].

Carbon dioxide also acts as a greenhouse gas, exerting a warming influence on climate and weather [Section 3.1]. Climate change projections require scenarios of future emissions. There is evidence that scenarios widely-used in the impacts literature have overstated observed and likely future emission trends [Section 3.1].

The world’s several dozen global climate models offer little guidance on how much the climate

responds to elevated CO2, with the average surface warming under a doubling of the CO2 concentration ranging from 1.8°C to 5.7°C [Section 4.2]. Data-driven methods yield a lower and narrower range [Section 4.3]. Global climate models generally run “hot” in their description of the climate of the past few decades – too much warming at the surface and too much amplification of warming in the lower- and midtroposphere [Sections 5.2-5.4]. The combination of overly sensitive models and implausible extreme scenarios for future emissions yields exaggerated projections of future warming.

Most extreme weather events in the U.S. do not show long-term trends. Claims of increased frequency or intensity of hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and droughts are not supported by U.S. historical data [Sections 6.1-6.7]. Additionally, forest management practices are often overlooked in assessing changes in wildfire activity [Section 6.8]. Global sea level has risen approximately 8 inches since 1900, but there are significant regional variations driven primarily by local land subsidence; U.S. tide gauge measurements in aggregate show no obvious acceleration in sea level rise beyond the historical average rate [Chapter 7]

Attribution of climate change or extreme weather events to human CO2 emissions is challenged by natural climate variability, data limitations, and inherent model deficiencies [Chapter 8]. Moreover, solar activity’s contribution to the late 20th century warming might be underestimated [Section 8.3.1]. Both models and experience suggest that CO2-induced warming might be less damaging economically than commonly believed, and excessively aggressive mitigation policies could prove more detrimental than beneficial [Chapters 9, 10, Section 11.1]. Social Cost of Carbon estimates, which attempt to quantify the economic damage of CO2 emissions, are highly sensitive to their underlying assumptions and so provide limited independent information [Section 11.2]. U.S. policy actions are expected to have undetectably small direct impacts on the global climate and any effects will emerge only with long delays [Chapter 12].

See also comments by Dr. Roy Spencer, one of the authors.

New Study Thoroughly Disassembles The CO2-Drives-Climate Assumption In One Fell Swoop

by Kenneth Richard

Not only does CO2 have no discernible effect on climate, but any alleged anthropogenic role within the hypothetical greenhouse effect is not detectable either. In recent decades there has been a concerted effort to assert it is “settled” science to characterize variability in the atmospheric CO2 concentration – assumed to be modulated by human activity – as the predominant factor in both climate change and the so-called greenhouse effect.

Science, however, is never truly settled.

A new Frontiers study succinctly unsettles this prevailing paradigm with surgeon-like precision. In under 20 pages the authors deliver a cogent critique of the CO2-drives-climate presumption. A few of the key points include:

• CO2 only contributes about 4-5% to the greenhouse effect, whereas water vapor and clouds contribute 95%.

• Of that 4-5% greenhouse effect contribution from CO2, just 4% of that can be attributed to human activities (i.e., fossil fuel emissions). Thus, about 96% of the 4% contribution from CO2 can be attributed to natural processes.

“WV [water vapor] and clouds (for which WV is responsible) dominate the ARE [atmospheric radiative effect], while CO2 contributes only 4-5% to it. Also, anthropogenic CO2 emissions are only 4% of the total, with the vast majority (96%) being natural. Additionally, evidence suggests that changes in temperature precede those in CO2 concentration, thus challenging the assumption that CO2 drives temperature.”

• As Fig. 10 in the study indicates, observed changes in the atmospheric CO2 concentration cannot be demonstrated to have exerted any effect in altering longwave radiation measurements, much less the surface temperature. A hypothetical doubling the CO2 concentration [NC-RAGs, or non-condensing radiatively active gases] “results in a temperature increase of zero”.

“[W]hile the role of CO2 in photosynthesis is important in biochemical terms, it becomes negligible in terms of its contribution to the surface energy balance.”

“[T]he observed increase of the atmospheric CO2 [from 300 ppm to 420 ppm] has not altered the ARE [atmospheric radiative effect or greenhouse effect] in any discernible way.” (Read more) ☼

SH Drives UAH Temps Cooler July 2025

by Ron Clutz

The post below updates the UAH record of air temperatures over land and ocean. Each month and year exposes again the growing disconnect between the real world and the Zero Carbon zealots. It is as though the anti-hydrocarbon band wagon hopes to drown out the data contradicting their justification for the Great Energy Transition. Yes, there was warming from an El Nino buildup coincidental with North Atlantic warming, but no basis to blame it on CO2. (Read more) ☼

Surprise! Study says Late Jurassic CO2 was 1,200 ppm, dipped to 750 ppm in the Cretaceous

by Anthony Watts

Press release from University of Göttingen: T-Rex Dinosaur teeth give glimpse of early Earth’s climate

The study shows that the late Jurassic atmosphere carried about 1,200 ppm of CO2, about four times the pre industrial 1850 benchmark of 280 ppm. By the late Cretaceous, CO2 it had dipped to near 750 ppm.

A previously untapped source of data sheds new light on the climate of the early Earth: fossilized dinosaur teeth show that the atmosphere during the Mesozoic era, between 252 and 66 million years ago, contained far more carbon dioxide than it does today. An international research team at the Universities of Göttingen, Mainz and Bochum made this discovery by analysing oxygen isotopes in tooth enamel. They used a newly developed method that opens up opportunities for research into the Earth’s climate history. In addition, the researchers found that total photosynthesis from plants around the world was twice as high as it is today. This probably contributed to the dynamic climate during the time of the dinosaurs. The results were published in the journal PNAS. (Read more) ☼

TV Forecasts Use Heat Index To Inflate Climate Fears, Mislead Viewers On Real Temps

by Anthony Watts

Every summer, TV meteorologists across the United States increasingly trumpet the “heat index” as an important headline number. But that figure — the infamous “feels like” temperature — is a calculated estimate, not the actual air temperature. Its overuse smacks more of sensationalism than scientific clarity.

For example, WFLA in Tampa, Florida, recently announced an all-time record heat index, declaring that “this is the highest heat index ever recorded.” It wasn’t recorded. It isn’t a measurement. So, that’s false. The heat index is a formula developed by the U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) based on Robert G. Steadman’s 1979 paper “The Assessment of Sultriness.” Before that, it didn’t exist. It combines actual air temperature and relative humidity into an approximate “apparent” temperature, as if the humidity were higher or lower. The heat index equation predicts human-perceived heat, assuming shaded, low-wind conditions, and a generic adult body type — but ignores sunlight, wind, individual physiology, hydration, age, weight, health status, and so on. (Read more) ☼

New Study: No Decline In Arctic Sea Ice Extent – ‘No Long-Term Trend’ – Since 2007

by Kenneth Richard

In 2007 Al Gore won a Nobel Peace prize for predicting summer (September) Arctic sea ice would “vanish” in the next 5 to 7 years, or by 2014. Since 2007 Arctic sea ice extent (SIE) losses have ceased. Instead, the SIE trend has been stable for nearly two decades (Stern, 2025). (Read more) ☼

New Study: Corals Thrived In Warmer-Than-Today Temps And When Sea Levels Were Meters Higher

by Kenneth Richard

New research from Indonesia indicates that from about 10,000 to 6000 years ago, when the ocean was warmer than today, coral reef growth was rapid, averaging ~6 mm per year.

Sea levels rose rapidly from the Early to Mid Holocene in this region, as they were up to 2 m higher than today 6000 years ago. The higher sea levels meant there was more room for coral reef growth.

As the ocean cooled and sea levels fell ~2 meters from the Mid-Holocene highstand, coral growth slowed to ~2-3 mm per year.

Today corals are only growing at rates of ~1 mm per year, as the water depths are too low to accommodate reef expansion. In fact, coral coverage “has declined on the flats over the last few decades,” as the “accommodation space is less than a meter at points.” (Read more) ☼

New study: Data reveals CO2 residence time is 3-7 years. 90% of human emissions since 1750 have thus already been removed, precluding a human-CO2-driven climate. But the UN IPCC uses model assumptions to claim CO2 residence time is over 100 years (Read more) ☼

Causality Analysis Finds Temperature Changes Have Determined CO2 Changes Since The Phanerozoic

by Kenneth Richard

Popular claims that CO2 changes drive temperature changes currently or throughout the distant past “are based on imagination and climate models full of assumptions.” A comprehensive new study details a stochastic assessment determination of the sequencing of CO2 variations versus temperature variations since the 1950s, over the last 2,000 years (the Common Era), and throughout the last 541 million years. The robust conclusion is that the causality direction – with the understanding that causes lead and effects lag – clearly shows the temperature changes lead and CO2 changes lag on yearly, decadal, and centennial/millennial scales. (Read more) ☼

From the atmosphere to the abyss: Iron’s role in Earth’s climate history

by Anthony Watts

A new study published by researchers at the University of Hawaii at Mauna Loa sheds light on the critical role of iron in Earth’s climate history, revealing how its sources in the South Pacific Ocean have shifted over the past 93 million years. This groundbreaking research, based on the analysis of deep-sea sediment cores, provides crucial insights into the interplay between iron, marine life, and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.

Iron is a vital nutrient for marine life and plays a significant role in regulating atmospheric carbon dioxide by influencing the growth of phytoplankton, which absorb carbon dioxide. Although the importance of iron today is well-established, researchers have a limited understanding of how past iron availability may have shaped the marine ecosystem.

To investigate the long-term history of oceanic iron, the researchers meticulously analyzed iron isotopes in three deep-sea sediment cores from the South Pacific, far removed from continental influences. (Read more) ☼

Media’s Latest Spin: Blame Trump For Rising Energy Prices, Ignore Dems’ Aggressive Green Policies Energy experts, grid watchdogs, and operators have long warned that the Biden-era green energy push threatens grid security and drives up electricity costs, as power demand also surges from the booming artificial intelligence (AI) sector. (link) ☼

The EPA’s Era Of Wasting Billions On Corrupt Green Scams Has Ended

by Katie Pavlich

Since retaking office in January, President Donald Trump has made it a priority to rid the federal government of leftist “green” scams that drain the pockets of taxpayers and hamper domestic energy production. According to Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin, more than three times the EPA budget was being spent on “climate change” and other bogus programs. “Over $29 billion in grants have been cancelled,” Zeldin told Fox News in an interview on Tuesday, adding that much of the money was going to friends of Democrats.

In July, President Trump signed an executive order ending a number of corrupt subsidies for unreliable energy sources.

“Unreliable wind and solar energy sources displace affordable, dispatchable energy, compromise America’s electric grid, and denigrate the beauty of our Nation’s natural landscape. Reliance on so-called ‘green’ subsidies threatens national security by making the United States dependent on supply chains controlled by foreign adversaries,” the White House released in a statement.

“Ending the massive cost of taxpayer handouts to unreliable energy sources is vital to energy dominance, national security, economic growth, and the fiscal health of the Nation.” (Source) ☼

Trump Unsettles Supposedly Settled Climate Science (link) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

by Jonathan DuHamel

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, the night side of the planet would freeze every night.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

GEOLOGY & CLIMATE-ROCKS TELL THE STORY

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

New study shows that carbon dioxide is responsible for only seven percent of the greenhouse effect

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

THE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY PROJECT REPORTS

[SEPP provides a weekly roundup of news available every Monday as The Week That Was (PDF) and reprinted as a blog post here as Weekly Climate and EnergyNews Roundup. Click on date for full reports.]

AUGUST 2:

Scope: TWTW begins a third discussion of a paper by Howard Hayden on the difference between “climate science” and understanding the greenhouse effect. TWTW then discusses an announcement by the administrator of the EPA and a surprise report by the Secretary of the Department of Energy. TWTW then discusses comments by Judith Curry and Roy Spencer who worked on a new report by DOE. TWTW concludes with part of a statement published in the Federal Register.

AUGUST 9:

Scope: TWTW begins a fourth and final discussion of a paper by Howard Hayden on the difference between “climate science” and understanding the greenhouse effect. TWTW then discusses an alternative way of looking at the greenhouse effect in today’s atmosphere discussed by physicist Donald Rapp. TWTW briefly discusses the DOE report and Climate Oscillations. TWTW concludes with a discussion of the June heat wave by the WeatherBell team and effective propaganda.

AUGUST 16:

Scope: TWTW begins with the highlights of Andrew Bolt’s interview of Steven Koonin then continues with a discussion of key issues in the report by the Climate Working Group to the Secretary of Energy. TWTW concludes with a discussion of increasing greenhouse gases today.

CO2 enhances photosynthesis and improves plant water use efficiency, thereby promoting plant growth. Global greening is due in part to increased CO2 levels in the atmosphere is well-established on all continents.

A final point worth stressing is that in complex systems, such as the climatic system, observational data are the only scientific test bed for making hypotheses and assessing their validity. Focusing on one of the factors affecting the climatic system, namely, the anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and basing on models that emphasize this factor, may distort our perception of the big picture and be detrimental to science, whose objective is to pursue the truth.”

AUGUST 23:

Scope: TWTW begins with a second discussion of key issues in the report by the Climate Working Group to the Secretary of Energy. Then, it presents a request for information from the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. TWTW concludes with a discussion of the reasons why grid level storage batteries are impractical for a modern grid.

END

SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 JULY

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel You may post comments at the end of this post or send them to [email protected]

“Any physical theory is always provisional, in the sense that it is only a hypothesis: you can never prove it. No matter how many times the results of experiments agree with some theory, you can never be sure that the next time the result will not contradict the theory. On the other hand, you can disprove a theory by finding even a single observation that disagrees with the predictions of the theory.” –Stephen Hawking

“The problem is that you can accept all the basic tenets of greenhouse physics and still conclude that the threat of a dangerously large warming is so improbable as to be negligible, while the threat of real harm from climate-mitigation policies is already so high as to be worrying, that the cure is proving far worse than the disease is ever likely to be.” –Matt Ridley, Angus Millar Lecture of the Royal Society of the Arts Edinburgh, 31 October 2011

CLIMATE

Skeptics Win, Endangerment Finding Axed – Truth Finally Prevails in The Climate Wars

by Anthony Watts

Today (7-29-25) is a monumental win for climate skeptics

Today’s decision by the Environmental Protection Agency to remove the Carbon Dioxide Endangerment Finding represents a pivotal shift in America’s approach to climate policy—one rooted in evidence, not ideology. For years, this “finding” has served as the legal justification for an array of costly, far-reaching regulations targeting everything from our nation’s power plants to the cars we drive and the energy bills we pay. Its removal is a direct response to mounting evidence that the basis for this rule was always more about speculative modeling and political maneuvering than sound science. (Read more) ☼

See also: New Climate Assessment Report from US DOE (link) for comments

and the DOE report. “Among the key findings, the report concludes that carbon dioxide (CO2) -induced warming appears to be less damaging economically than commonly believed, and that aggressive mitigation strategies could be more harmful than beneficial. Additionally, the report finds that U.S. policy actions are expected to have undetectably small direct impacts on the global climate and any effects will emerge only with long delays.” ☼

Temperature – a driver of the carbon cycle

by Joachim Dengler

Are the natural carbon sinks failing?

For a long time, the discussion about the relation between temperature and CO2 concentration has been focused on the greenhouse effect and its possible feedback mechanisms, captured by the concept of sensitivity. Here, I would like to shift the focus to the other side of the story: the possible causal influence of global sea surface temperature on the growth of CO2 concentration. Some readers may see this as a contradictory paradigm to the greenhouse effect; others may see it as one of the feedback mechanisms of the greenhouse effect.(Read more ) ☼

Antarctic Ice Sheet Growth Continues to Puzzle Climate Scientists – ‘A record-breaking increase in overall mass’

by Marco Kopinke

The Antarctic Ice Sheet has done something that genuinely shocked climate scientists around the world. Between 2021 and 2023, the AIS experienced a record-breaking increase in overall mass, marking the first time in decades that Antarctica gained mass, reversing previous loss trends. This wasn’t just a minor fluctuation – the ice sheet gained approximately 108 gigatons per year during this period, completely reversing what scientists had observed for the previous two decades. (Read more) ☼

Stop Lying, The Guardian, the World’s Oceans Aren’t Becoming Dangerously Acidic

by H. Sterling Burnett

The U.K.’s The Guardian ran an article claiming that the world’s oceans have surpassed a critical tipping point in acidity threatening sea life. This is false. The pH content of the world’s oceans varies by time and place throughout the day, rising and falling modestly, but the average pH content remains far from acidic and there is no evidence crustaceans or other types of shellfish are being threatened by the sea water becoming acidic. (Read more) ☼

New Study: The Arctic Was 9°C Warmer Than Today During The Holocene Thermal Maximum

by Kenneth Richard

Holocene (11,700 to 8,200 years ago) Arctic (Svalbard) temperatures “were up to 9°C higher than today” according to the authors of a new Nature journal study. At that time CO2 was thought to only hover around 260 ppm. Svalbard then cooled as CO2 rose for the next 8,000 years – a negative correlation that wholly contradicts the rising-CO2-drives-Arctic-warmth narrative. (Read more) ☼

Ancient Arctic Mud Just Shattered a Climate Ice Myth

Written by SciTechDaily

Evidence of algae growth and climate simulations reveal the Arctic had seasonal ice, not a permanent ice shelf, for much of the past 750,000 years. These insights challenge long-standing theories. (Read more) ☼

Media, Politicians Blame Climate Change For Texas Floods, Ignore Conflicting Data

A climatologist’s call for truth and action—not political exploitation—in the wake of the Texas flood tragedy.

by Dr. Matthew Wielicki

The heartbreaking flooding in central Texas, including the devastating loss of young lives at a girls’ camp near Austin, is a tragedy that demands reflection, accountability, and action, not political grandstanding. The severe flooding that struck central Texas, including areas near Austin, has brought renewed attention to the vulnerabilities of flood-prone valleys.

Heavy rains rapidly overwhelmed local waterways, causing flash flooding that destroyed homes, infrastructure, and tragically claimed lives.

Reports indicate that despite receiving advanced warning from weather services, the response at local and regional levels was tragically insufficient, highlighting critical gaps in emergency preparedness and land-use planning.

Historically, central Texas is recognized as one of the most flood-prone areas in the United States. Flood events have occurred with devastating frequency and intensity for decades.

The construction of dams and reservoirs throughout the 20th century was largely driven by the necessity of managing these frequent flooding episodes.

Ironically, these infrastructure developments dramatically reduced flood magnitudes across many rivers, making the recent catastrophe even more indicative of infrastructure and regulatory failure than any long-term climatic shift. (Read more) ☼

SURPRISING: scientists find ties between Earth’s oxygen and magnetic field

by Anthony Watts

For 540 million years, the ebb and flow in the strength of Earth’s magnetic field has correlated with fluctuations in atmospheric oxygen, according to a newly released analysis by NASA scientists. The research suggests that processes deep inside the Earth might influence habitability on the planet’s surface.

Earth’s magnetic field arises from the flow of material in the planet’s molten interior, which acts like a giant electromagnet. The flow isn’t perfectly stable, and this causes the field to change over time.

The history of the Earth’s magnetic fields is recorded in magnetized minerals. When hot minerals that rise with magma at gaps between spreading tectonic plates cool down, they can record the surrounding magnetic field. The minerals retain the field record as long as they are not reheated too severely. Scientists can deduce historic oxygen levels from ancient rocks and minerals because their chemical contents depend on the amount of oxygen available when they were formed. (Read more) ☼

Climate Fact Check – June 2025

This summary serves as a fact check on the top false claims made about climate change by the media in June 2025. Scientifically debunking claims about heatwaves, hurricanes, extreme weather, ocean acidification, & food shortages. (Read more) ☼

Real-World Data Shreds Warming Narrative Pushed By Activists and Media

Fact checking claims linking heat, floods, and ice loss to human-driven climate change.

by I & I Editorial Board

The climate alarmists regularly seize on weather events they believe will help them exploit their narrative. Naturally, they ignore contradictory information. So we see it as our duty to fill in the gaps from time to time. The following are a few examples that show why the global warming story is less scientific theory than conjecture in the service of a political agenda: (Read more) ☼

The ‘Fruitful’ Results of Increasing CO2

by Vijay Jayaraj

Among the climatically correct, nothing is more scandalous than describing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions as beneficial. You can be blacklisted from public forums, professional networking sites, and even be removed from your tenured university position as an accomplished scientist.

Nonetheless, the truth is this: CO2 is fundamental to the photosynthetic process by which plants make food for themselves – and ultimately for us. Furthermore, the increase in atmospheric CO2 from industrial activity in the past century has helped vegetation over most of the planet to flourish. Also benefiting plants has been the relative warmth of recent decades. (Read more) ☼

New Record Set For Deaths From Climate And Weather Disasters

by Francis Menton

During the first half of 2025, a new record was set for the number of deaths caused by climate and weather disasters. Can you guess what that record was?

If you read left-wing media sources, and believe anything they say, you might think that the recent record has something to do with a large and growing number of deaths. Recent articles in sources like CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, and CBS News all explicitly claim that climate change is making weather events “deadlier,” or leading to increasing numbers of deaths, or some variation of that same message. I’m sure if you checked thirty such “mainstream” news sources over the past year, all thirty of them would have pieces parroting that same narrative.

Therefore you might be surprised by the actual record that has been set: The first half of 2025 (January to June) has seen the fewest number of deaths from climate and weather disasters of any first half year this century. (Read more) ☼

Whistleblower: Secret U.S. Geoengineering Programs Still Running Despite Federal Ban

A new report called Dark MAHA reveals how billions are still funding geoengineering projects and hiding behind euphemisms to escape scrutiny. Independent medical researchers have raised serious concerns that exposure by humans to the fine particulates of elements such as aluminum, barium, and strontium, which are used in stratospheric aerosol injection, may be playing havoc with public health. (Read more) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, the night side of the planet would freeze every night.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

New study shows that carbon dioxide is responsible for only seven percent of the greenhouse effect

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

ENERGY

More American Energy Needs More Minerals and Better Permitting

by Jeremy Harrell

News out recently that the Trump Administration is imposing a new copper tariff may have come as a surprise to some, but it shouldn’t have. Regardless of who is in the White House, our access to important minerals like copper, a critical resource for clean energy development, depends on a delicately balanced supply chain that can be disrupted by an array of geopolitical or economic considerations. However, this announcement put a bright spotlight on the need for onshoring critical mineral production across America to help meet the rapidly growing energy demand.

While the majority of copper supplies come from Chile, Canada and Mexico – China leads the world in copper refining, with over half the world’s smelting capacity. The good news – we can and should source more domestically. Americans can look to places like the Santa Cruz mine in Arizona or the Twin Metals project in Minnesota which are modern, innovative and domestic projects with strong environmental records.

Further, projects like these will support economic development across rural communities. Northeast Minnesota, where multiple companies are proposing to develop mining projects, is home to the world’s largest known undeveloped source of copper, nickel, cobalt, platinum group metals and more. The Duluth Complex mineral deposit in this area contains an estimated four billion tons of resources, estimated to be worth more than $1 trillion. New copper-nickel mining projects proposed in this area will create hundreds of millions in revenue through state and federal taxes and royalties and will generate several thousand high-paying jobs. The average salary for these mining jobs is more than $100,000 per year, and each one will generate another 1.5 spinoff jobs in related industries. However, these proposed projects have faced setbacks due to the lengthy, duplicative, and expensive permitting process and unending litigation by opposition groups. (Read more) ☼

How Fossil Fuels Powered the Greatest Leap in Human Progress

Climate activists say fossil fuels are killing us. History and data show the opposite. (Read more) ☼

Trump On Verge Of Nixing Endangerment Finding, The Left’s Favorite Climate Tool

by Audrey Streb

The Trump administration is on the precipice of ending the Endangerment Finding, a rule that Democrats have used for years to impose harsh climate regulations, energy policy experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The Endangerment Finding, established in 2009 under the Obama Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), rules that greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), can be regulated for the sake of human health and the environment.

The underlying science was contested when the EPA established the rule, and the Endangerment Finding has since been used to impose draconian regulations on power plants, leading to closures across the country and paving the way for Democrat policies that forced electric vehicles (EVs) and appliances onto consumers, energy sector experts told the DCNF.

“The Endangerment Finding was the result of a highly politicized process relying on cherry-picked data meant to appease the wants of climate extremists. It quickly became a favorite tool of Democrat administrations and their left-wing allies to manipulate the economy in favor of their politically preferred technologies like wind, solar, and electric vehicles,” Mandy Gunasekara, author and former EPA Chief of Staff under the first Trump administration, told the DCNF.

“The effects of the regulatory schemes built on the Endangerment Finding are far-reaching and costly. The Endangerment Finding has led to higher energy costs, unreliable electricity grids, lost jobs, and a shift of investment to overseas countries like China and India that have lackluster environmental standards.” (Read more) ☼

The $7 Trillion Lie – How the Media Twists The Facts About Fossil Fuel Subsidies

by Dr. Matthew Wielicki

In this article, I will show you how the $7 trillion figure is not only wildly inflated… it is deliberately manipulated to mislead the public, obscure where your tax dollars are actually going, and justify the unchecked siphoning of wealth into the green industrial complex. This lie is not just academic. It is the foundation for the green energy slush funds, regulatory overreach, and carbon taxes now being pushed across the globe. (Read more) ☼

Wyoming rare earth mining facility to be first to open in over 70 years

The Brook Mine Carbon Ore Rare Earth project will also be Wyoming’s first new coal mine in over 50 years

by Pilar Arias

The U.S. Secretary of Energy and other elected officials are preparing to travel to Wyoming for the opening of the first new coal mine in the state in more than five decades. The ribbon cutting for the Brook Mine Carbon Ore Rare Earth project will be on July 11. National and state leaders are expected to speak at the event in Ranchester. “It will be the first new rare earth mine in the United States in more than 70 years and the first new coal mine in Wyoming in over 50 years,” Ramaco Resources, Inc. said in a press release. “This is more than a ribbon cutting — it’s a declaration of America’s resolve to reclaim its leadership in critical minerals and energy independence,” Randall W. Atkins, Chairman and Chief Executive of Ramaco Resources, said in a statement. (Read more) ☼

Geothermal Energy: Another Nail in the Coffin of Wind and Solar Power?

by Bonner Cohen, Ph. D.

As if the resurgence of fossil fuels and the realistic prospect of a renaissance of nuclear energy in the U.S. were not enough, purveyors of intermittent and subsidy-dependent wind and solar power may be facing another challenge, this one emanating from heat stored deep beneath the earth’s surface. (Read more) ☼

Gas Crisis Looms Over California As Dems Continue To Impose Crippling Regs (link) ☼

Trump’s Mineral Policy Offers Strategic Opportunity in the Pacific

by Wyatt Greco

A seabed mining agreement with the island nation of Nauru would reduce China’s influence while establishing America as an industry authority. (Read more) ☼

Trump Halted California’s Wind Gamble And Saved Ratepayers Big-League (link) ☼

Data Centers Push U.S. Power Grid To The Brink, Forcing Energy Rethink

The AI revolution is straining American energy and sending electric bills soaring.

by Thomas Catenacci

Electric bills for millions of Americans are expected to rise by more than 20 percent in the coming months. The number of power grid blackouts could double by 2030. Electricity demand in that same period will skyrocket, far surpassing current levels. It’s all part of what the top North American power grid watchdog says is one of the grid’s “greatest near-term reliability challenges”: the rapid development of data centers, which contain fast-working, electricity-hungry computer systems that support artificial intelligence technology. Across the country, tech firms are building data centers faster than power companies can build new electricity generation plants, creating the potential for supply crunches and shortages. (Read more) ☼

THE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY PROJECT REPORTS

[SEPP provides a weekly roundup of news available every Monday as The Week That Was (PDF) and reprinted as a blog post here as Weekly Climate and EnergyNews Roundup. Click on date for full reports.]

JUNE 28:

Scope: TWTW begins with a paper by Nicola Scafetta discussing the deficiencies of Global Climate Models. It presents part of an interview of Judith Curry who was repelled by the careerism that is now entrenched in academic climate science. TWTW summarizes part of a talk by UK energy consultant Kathryn Porter focusing on general comments. TWTW presents a paper on decreasing cloudiness followed by two posts by Willis Eschenbach that demolish an effort to use ocean pH as a proxy for historic ocean temperatures. TWTW discusses an article by Steve Milloy on the closing of the laboratory that experimented with human subjects with PM 2.5, then TWTW discusses New York’s effort to replace the electrical power provided by natural gas generation. TWTW concludes with a presentation of part of the program of the upcoming DDP conference and where to register to attend in person or by Zoom.

JULY 12:

Scope: TWTW begins a discussion on one key point in the complex, evidence filled, separate presentations by Willie Soon and John Clauser at the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness annual meeting. They show that omission of critical data often results in a deceit. TWTW continues with another omission of data that helped the acceptance of the Linear No Threshold Model and concludes with a brief discussion of the recent flood in Texas.

JULY 19:

Scope: TWTW begins a discussion of the recipient of the 2024 Frederick Seitz Memorial Award continues with a long introduction to a paper by Howard Hayden on the difference between “climate science” and understanding the greenhouse effect. TWTW then discusses how cherry-picking continues in papers claiming that CO2 is the primary cause of climate change for the past 540 million years. Then TWTW concluded with brief discussions of the Hunga Eruption, the Iberian Blackout, and the recipient of the 2025 SEPP April Fools Award.

Frederick Seitz Memorial Award: Each year SEPP gives the Frederick Seitz Memorial Award recognizing an individual or a team that contributed significantly in preserving the scientific method in physical science. The scientific method requires that all theories, hypotheses, ideas, etc. be tested against all physical evidence before being accepted. If the theory, etc. is contradict by such physical evidence from observation or experiment it is wrong. Mathematical models are not physical evidence.

To explain the relationship between climate and greenhouse gases, we will present brief overviews of these topics. Read more by clicking on date above.

JULY 26:

Scope: TWTW begins a second discussion of a paper by Howard Hayden on the difference between “climate science” and understanding the greenhouse effect. TWTW then discusses a plea from researcher Forest Mims to keep the Mauna Loa Observatory open which he used to show that a key assumption in global climate models is contradicted by physical evidence. Following this is a discussion of possible misuse of observations from weather balloons. TWTW concludes with a discussion of the legal bias exhibited by the International Court of Justice in its advisory opinion about climate change.

*********************

END

SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 JUNE

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel  Send comments to [email protected]

“The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when one contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries to comprehend only a little of this mystery every day.”— Albert Einstein

“The climate-studies people who work with models always tend to overestimate their models. They come to believe models are real and forget they are only models. … Most of the evolution of life occurred on a planet substantially warmer than it is now and substantially richer in carbon dioxide.” – Freeman Dyson

CLIMATE

BOMBSHELL: Study Reveals Climate Warming Driven by Receding Cloud Cover – Study destabilizes alarmist narrative – ‘A reduction in cloud cover…has resulted in less solar radiation being reflected back into space & more being absorbed by the Earth’s surface’ (Read more) ☼

Study Finds Europe Was Warmer And Wetter For Most Of The Last 9,000 Years

by Kenneth Richard

A new European Alps hydroclimate reconstruction spanning the years 8980 BC to 2014 CE has been derived from the stable isotopes of 192 trees (Arosio et al., 2025).

The reconstruction clearly distinguishes centennial-scale warm periods such as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), Roman Warm Period (RWP), and millennial-scale African Humid Period (when the Sahara was green, lake- and fauna-covered). These warmer centuries (millennia) were accompanied by wetter, much more humid climates.

In contrast, the coldest centuries of the Holocene, such as the Little Ice Age (18th and 19th centuries) and Late Antique Little Ice Age (6th century), had the driest hydroclimates with the “most severe summer droughts of the past 9,000 years.” (Read more) ☼

Media Blame Early 2025 Heat Wave On Climate Change, But History Tells A Hotter Tale

by Steve Goreham

This week, the U.S. experienced the first major heat wave of 2025. Over 160 million people in the Midwest, the South, and the East Coast experienced temperatures approaching 100°F.

Many in the media claim that the soaring temperatures are a result of human-caused global warming. But a look at history shows that such high temperatures have been experienced many times in the past. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) tracks states’ record-high temperatures and the dates when they occur. The data shows that 36 of the 50 states’ record highs were set more than five decades ago. Twenty-three states’ record-high temperatures occurred in the 1930s, when annual human CO2 emissions were less than one-eighth of today’s emissions. (Read more) ☼

New Analysis: IPCC’s Emissions-Based Climate Model Errors So Massive They Eliminate Predictive Validity

by Kenneth Richard

A new evidence-based study provides compelling evidence that for decades the IPCC has been engaged “advocacy research,” or the “antiscientific practice of undertaking research designed to support a given hypothesis.”

The IPCC-favored climate model parameters used to support the narrative that climate change is primarily caused by humans burning fossil fuels (referred to as the Anthro models in the study) is so fraught with errors that even a stripped-down benchmark model that merely projects future temperatures will not deviate from the historical average overwhelmingly outperforms the IPCC’s modeling. (Read more) ☼

Renowned Scientists Challenge IPCC Climate Claims, Call CO2 Threat ‘Scientifically False’

What if the foundation of the climate scare was a calculated lie?

by I & I Editorial Board

Carbon dioxide (CO2), we’ve been told over and over again, is the enemy that must be subdued if we are to avoid catastrophic global warming. It is, however, a faulty premise.

Physics, not politics, tells us that man’s CO2 emissions will not cause catastrophic climate change nor an increase in extreme weather. “The common belief that CO2 is the main driver of climate change and the EPA Endangerment Finding assertion that ‘elevated concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may reasonably be anticipated’ to endanger the public health and welfare are scientifically false,” conclude the authors of a new paper. (Read more) ☼

Professor Judith Curry: Climate Science Has Become Pseudo Science

“Your funding, salary increase, and tenure case are tied to agreeing with the ‘consensus.’ It’s really about careerism and resources. They all have to dance to that same drum beat to get professional recognition and professional advancement,” says Dr. Judith Curry, professor emeritus at the Georgia Institute of Technology, describing the state of climate science and research in recent years. (Read more and/or watch video) ☼

The 97% Consensus Myth is Debunked

by Chris Martz

One of the most pervasive myths is that 97% (or sometimes stated as >99%) of “climate scientists” agree that virtually all global warming since the mid-19th century is human-caused and that this warming is an existential threat to the welfare of the planet and all life on it. Except, this statistic is largely made up, and no matter how many times it is quashed, it persists as a talking point in online forums. (Read more ) See also my post: The 97 percent consensus for human caused climate change debunked again 

“Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels…If it is consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus.”— Michael Crichton

Meteorologist Exposes How Warmer Nights, Not Hotter Days, Skew Heated Climate Claims

Warmer summers? Not so fast Axios: nighttime lows, not daytime highs, drive the heat.

by Anthony Watts

In its recent article, “America’s summers keep getting warmer,” Axios claims that hotter summers across the U.S. are “one of the clearest ways we experience climate change.” That statement is misleading. The article focuses exclusively on “average summer temperatures” while ignoring crucial underlying details — specifically, the difference between daytime highs and nighttime lows. A closer look at the data suggests that rising nighttime temperatures, not dangerous daytime heat, are mostly to blame for the modest increase in “average” temperatures. This pattern is a well-documented signature of the urban heat island (UHI) effect, not global climate change. (Read more) ☼ See also my blog post: Urban heat island effect on temperatures, a tale of two cities 

Global Greening From Higher CO2 Hits “Striking” New Heights – but the Mainstream Media Won’t Tell You About It

by Chris Morrison

Significant new evidence has emerged of widespread and significant increases in plant vegetation across the Earth due to the recent rise of the trace gas carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Using what they describe as True Significant Trends – a workflow programme integrating sophisticated spatial and time-period data – a geographer and an agrobiologist in Spain found “robust quantitative evidence” of widespread global greening, describing it as “striking” – “with a significant portion of Earth’s terrestrial land surface showing measurable increases in vegetation cover over the last four decades”. (Read more) ☼

Top Ten Reasons to Shut Down NASA’s Climate Change Shop Known as GISS

by Anthony Watts

For decades, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) has projected itself as a sentinel of Earth’s climate future. But its transformation from a space science institute into a climate policy echo chamber represents a textbook example of mission drift. Founded for planetary studies, GISS has long since abandoned its original purpose and embraced speculative climate modeling and media-driven narratives—often built on data more adjusted than measured. It’s time to be honest: GISS should be closed. Here are ten good reasons why. (Read more) ☼

Media Pushes Climate Fears Over Arizona Wine, But Vineyards Keep Thriving

by H. Sterling Burnett

The Arizona Republic ran a story expressing worry that the state’s “booming” wine industry will be unable to cope with climate change. This is false. The commercial wine industry is of fairly recent vintage, arising amid and beginning to thrive during ongoing climate change. No measurable temperature or weather trends suggest it won’t be able to keep flourishing in the future. (Read more) ☼

Net Zero Fantasies Collide With America’s Power-Hungry Reality

Soaring costs, blackouts, and slashed subsidies are shattering ‘green transition’ dreams.

by Steve Goreham (Read more) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

by Jonathan DuHamel

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. Submarine volcanoes must be considered when evaluating the causes of climate change. Usually, these changes are regional, not global, however they may have global influences such as changing precipitation patterns as seen with the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO).

By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, we would have freezing temperatures every night.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

Geology and climate – rocks tell the story

The Nonsense of “Net-Zero”

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

See also reports from the Heartland Institute: https://climatechangereconsidered.org/

ENERGY

Alaska’s Energy Will Power Jobs, Strength, Wealth

by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin

Alaska stands as an American energy powerhouse, a vital gateway to energy dominance, economic prosperity, and national security. The 49th state holds half of U.S. coal resources, the country’s fourth-largest proved crude oil reserves, and the second-largest proved natural gas reserves behind Texas. On his first day in office, President Donald Trump recognized these untapped opportunities and issued an important executive order, Unleashing Alaska’s Extraordinary Resource Potential. (Read more) ☼

See also: USGS Finds Nearly 30 Billion Barrels Of Untapped Oil Under Federal Lands (link) ☼

Why California Gas Prices Are the Highest in America

by Vance Ginn

California leads the nation in more ways than one — taxes, regulations, and, once again, gas prices. As of mid-May 2025, the average gasoline price in California is $4.85 per gallon, far above the national average of $3.26, according to GasBuddy and AAA. And it’s getting worse. A March 2025 study by USC Professor Michael Mische forecasts California’s fuel prices could spike 75 percent to over $8 per gallon within the next year. That’s not hyperbole — that’s the trajectory unless policymakers reverse course. (Read more) ☼

Why “cheaper” wind and solar raise costs. Part III: The problem with power markets

by Planning Engineer (Russ Schussler)

Part 3 of this series examines power markets, promoted by policymakers (FERC) and industry advocates to lower costs through competitive bidding and merit-order dispatch. While markets can optimize resource allocation in many sectors, they struggle to deliver affordability and reliability in electricity systems dominated by intermittent renewables. This post first explains how power markets operate, then highlights their challenges, and finally explores why they amplify the cost challenges associated with wind and solar. (Read more)

In Part 1 of this series, we explored how the fat tail problem undermines the cost-saving potential of wind and solar. It’s easy to supply electricity most of the time. The fat tail occurs in the rarer periods of maximal demands, when wind and solar are not available. These periods, not savings during easy times, drive system economics. Part 2 discussed how rate structures distort perceptions of affordability for solar applications. ☼

Failure Was an Option: Sunnova’s Taxpayer-Funded Solar Flop

by Robert Bradley Jr.

Rooftop solar will go down as one of the biggest consumer busts in energy history–and it is just getting started. Sunnova Energy International, with 441,000 rooftop customers, already the subject of mass complaints and lawsuits, can no longer perform on their long-term contracts. The problem is industry-wide… (Read more) ☼

Blackouts Surge: How Fragile Grids Threaten Global Energy Security

by Lars Schernikau

On April 28, 2025, the lights went out across Spain and Portugal, and just four days later, the island of Bali was wrapped into darkness.

In both cases, it happened in seconds. No war. No cyberattack. No act of nature. Just the hard truth of how today’s energy systems can wobble and break!

But let´s be honest… what happened in Spain, Portugal, and Bali isn’t just their problem. It’s our preview… a warning.

Power outages used to be rare, localized, and manageable. But not anymore. What happened in Spain, Portugal, and Bali in April 2025 was caused by fragile systems operating under idealistic assumptions.

In this article, I unpack what really triggered these cascading failures, what they reveal about the state of our energy infrastructure, and why grid reliability should now be considered a global security issue and not just a technical one. (Read more) ☼

Broken: New Material Revolutionizes Ion Conductivity World Record

by Technical University of Munich (TUM)

Researchers at TUM have developed a new material for solid-state batteries.

Solid-state batteries are seen as a game-changer for the future of energy storage. They can hold more power and are safer because they don’t rely on flammable materials like today’s lithium-ion batteries. Now, researchers at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) and TUMint.Energy Research have made a major breakthrough that could bring this future closer.

They have created a new material made from lithium, antimony, and a small amount of scandium. This material allows lithium ions to move more than 30 percent faster than any known alternative. That means record-breaking conductivity, which could lead to faster charging and more efficient batteries. (Read more) ☼

REGULATIONS

EPA Gets Moving On Its Push For Energy Deregulation

by Francis Menton

Now coming into view are the specifics of EPA’s strategy to end the Obama/Biden efforts to strangle the energy sector of the economy in the name of “saving the planet” from climate change. A document released by EPA last week on June 11 lays out the plan for repeal of the absurd (and dangerous) regulation that would have ended use of fossil fuels to generate electricity by some time in the 2030s. This EPA document is particularly interesting for the way it treats — and effectively sidelines — the so-called Endangerment Finding, the 2009 regulatory action that is the basis for all of the Obama/Biden fossil fuel suppression efforts.

President Trump made it clear from the first day of his new administration that he intended to undo as many as possible of the Obama/Biden era burdens and restriction on American energy production and use. Among the Executive Orders that Trump signed on “Day 1” (January 20, 2025) was one titled “Unleashing American Energy.” All agency heads were directed to review existing energy regulations for potential rescission as being overly burdensome. (Read more) ☼

It’s Time for a Strategic Minerals Reserve (link) ☼

Inflation Reduction Act Is A $2 Trillion Lie Crushing America’s Energy and Growth

by Frank Lasee

The Orwellian-named Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was sold to Americans as a cure for rising prices, but it was a lie from the start. Instead of taming inflation, this monstrous law has fueled government overreach, bloated spending, and economic harm. (Read more) ☼

THE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY PROJECT REPORTS

[SEPP provides a weekly roundup of news available every Monday as The Week That Was (PDF) and reprinted as a blog post here as Weekly Climate and EnergyNews Roundup. Click on date for full reports.]

MAY 31:

Scope: TWTW begins with a lengthy discussion to conclude the series whether climate science as practiced is a physical science. Then, TWTW discusses one of the many natural events that may be cyclical but not considered by the UN IPCC. It concludes with a decision by the Supreme Court that may limit the endless reviews spawned under the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

“To put it fairly, but bluntly, ‘climate science’—whatever its merits—is not the science of the greenhouse effect.”

The most important topic from increasing carbon dioxide is largely ignored by the IPCC and its collaborators. It is the increasing greening of the Earth from increasing photosynthesis. Earth is becoming more vibrant and livable. Why do many organizations in the West and Western governments oppose the use of fossil fuels which produce carbon dioxide? The earlier pollution problems have largely been solved and carbon dioxide, essential for food needed by complex life, is not a pollutant.

In Summary, Climate Science as practiced by the UN IPCC and its collaborators and as taught in colleges and universities is not a physical science. Global Climate Models are contradicted by physical evidence gathered in the atmosphere where the greenhouse effect occurs. In general, those making broad claims of the dangers of global warming and associated events ignore the fact that in physical science nature is the final and ultimate judge. Instead, they advocate a form of a social and political movement that may be destructive to modern civilization and humanity.

JUNE 7:

Scope: TWTW begins by reproducing a four-page report from Richard Lindzen and William Happer on Gold Standard Science. It continues with a discussion of a new pamphlet by the Global Warming Policy Foundation on the Net Zero Straitjacket followed by an essay on Outlawing Fossil Fuels by Bruce Everett and Gordon Tomb. David Middleton discusses the California Duck. Roger Caiazza discusses a new report by the New York independent system operator (NYISO). TWTW concludes with a report on COVID 19, demonstrating why the scientific method is important in fields beyond pure physical science.

Scientific knowledge is determined by the scientific method, Validating theoretical predictions with observations, not by government opinion, consensus, 97% of scientists’ opinions, peer review, models that do not work, or cherry-picked, fabricated, falsified or omitted contradictory data

It is astounding that one of the most complex questions in physics (namely, the behavior of a multi-phase, radiatively active, turbulent fluid) should be labeled by the government — and funding agencies it controls — to be so settled that skeptics are silenced. The models supporting the climate-crisis narrative make predictions that utterly fail to match the observations of what they purport to predict. This failure means in science they should never be used. Unfortunately, this peculiar situation is particularly dangerous because many world leaders have abandoned the science and intellectual rigor bequeathed to us by the Enlightenment and its forebears.

Dr. Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Suffice it to say that the many parameters influencing climate are too poorly understood to construct a useful predictive model. Among those factors are changes in Earth’s orbit, fluctuations in solar energy, volcanic emissions, changes in ocean currents and cloud formation.

JUNE 14:

Scope: TWTW begins with a report by Richard Lindzen and William Happer on greenhouse gases. They use the scientific method to substantiate that adding more greenhouse gases will benefit Earth and not cause human harm. TWTW then repeats a 2023 report by Happer, Lindzen, and Gregory Wrightstone demonstrating that the US 5th National Climate Assessment is scientifically fatally flawed. TWTW concludes with a discussion on inertia on the power grid.

JUNE 21:

Scope: TWTW begins with a paper by Richard Lindzen and William Happer calling for a repeal of the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) which provided hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies to unreliable wind and solar. TWTW continues with the significant omissions in proclamations by NOAA and other organizations in claiming increasing carbon dioxide is acidifying the oceans. TWTW discusses assertions by organizations and individuals that climate misinformation should be criminalized, ignoring the fact that such organizations and individuals rely on information that fails to meet the standards of the scientific method. TWTW questions what is meant by an existential threat, then concludes with a presentation of part of the program of the upcoming DDP conference and where to register to attend in person or by Zoom.

Repeal IRA Subsidies: Last week, TWTW focused on a paper by Richard Lindzen and William Happer emphasizing Gold Standard Science. “Scientific Knowledge Is Determined by the Scientific Method, Not by Government Opinion, Consensus, 97% of Scientists’ Opinions, Peer Review, Models that Do Not Work, or Cherry-Picked, Fabricated, Falsified or Omitted Contradictory Data.” This week, the CO2 Coalition published a paper by the same two authors titled “IRA Climate Subsidies Should Be Repealed.” The authors state:

“Physics demonstrates that the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA’s) trillion-dollar climate subsidies rest on false science. The real science, which is virtually never reported, is that the IRA subsidies of $4.7 trillion (Cato’s estimate to 2050) aim to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will have no climate benefit, for two separate and cumulative reasons:

First, the physics of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases shows that reducing them to net zero will have a negligible effect on temperatures and extreme weather. At present, there are no effective replacements for fossil fuels, and eliminating them will be disastrous for people worldwide. The scientific fact is that doubling carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would increase the world’s food supply by about 40%, with a trivial effect on Earth’s climate.

Second, the theory that GHG emissions are the primary driver of climate change is based on false science, such as consensus, theoretical models that do not work, fabricated and falsified data, agenda-driven peer review and government opinions. None of this is real science. (See our June 7, 2025, paper for details, Physics Demonstrates That Increasing Greenhouse Gases Cannot Cause Dangerous Warming, Extreme Weather or Any Harm.)

In summary, IRA subsidies will waste trillions of dollars for no climate benefit, reducing carbon dioxide emissions will reduce the amount of food worldwide, eliminating fossil fuels will be disastrous for people worldwide, and the trillions of dollars would be better spent improving Americans’ standard of living.

*********************

“Progress often involves the killing of an exquisite theory by an ugly fact.” — Leon Lederman, Nobel Laureate in Physics

“No government has the right to decide on the truth of scientific principles.” — Richard Feynman

END

SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 MAY

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel [email protected]

Mining Our Own Business – Rare Earth Minerals and other resources

by I & I Editorial Board

Rare earth elements are crucial to our modern existence, as well as our advanced defense systems. China, America’s primary supplier of these metals, has restricted exports of rare earths into the U.S. in retaliation for the president’s tariffs on Chinese exports into the country. There’s no reason to panic, though. There’s a way to work around the problem, and it doesn’t require a minerals deal with Ukraine.

Rare earth elements are needed to make our cellphones, computer hard drives, flat-screen monitors and televisions, as well as life-saving medical equipment. They are in fact “indispensable metals in electronics manufacturing.” Without them, modern society simply cannot survive. Even renewable energy sources, so precious to green zealots, need rare earths.

There are also “significant defense applications,” says the U.S. Geological Survey, including “electronic displays, guidance systems, lasers, and radar and sonar systems.”

Despite their importance to our economy and security, our “leaders” have put us in an awkward position. China provides the U.S. with 70% of the rare earth compounds we buy from abroad.

As their name implies, supplies are scarce. because they can’t be found “in high concentrations in the earth’s crust” and when they are discovered, the process to separate them from other resources is typically arduous.

But the process is not beyond the U.S.

This country could have – and should have – been mining large volumes of its own rare earths. But environmental zealots have blocked mining efforts, including the planned Pebble Mine in Alaska, home to at least 70 known occurrences of rare earth elements. It was shut down in 2014 even before the partnership applied for federal approval. The Environmental Protection Agency decided to kill this project before any science had been done. (Read more)

See also my blog posts: Rare Earth Resources in the US , and Coal – A Possible New Source of Rare Earth Elements , and Rare Earth Elements Deposits in New Mexico

Note: The U.S. is endowed with many sources of mineable minerals, but many have been stymied by government red tape. The Trump administration has issued multiple executive orders to reverse Biden-era restrictions, and this may apply to all minerals we need.

From Minerals Make Life:

On March 20, 2025, President Trump signed the “Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production“ executive order. This sweeping directive is aimed at bolstering domestic minerals production to enhance national security, support emerging technologies and reduce reliance on minerals imports.

Key Provisions of the Executive Order:

Streamlined and Expedited Permitting and Production: The EO directs federal agencies to compile a list of all pending mineral production projects within 10 days of the EO, and submit a list of priority projects for consideration under the FAST-41 Act. Federal lands with known mineral deposits will be prioritized, and existing land-use plans will be updated to align with the order’s objectives.

Expanding the Critical Minerals List. The EO expands the definition of critical minerals to include uranium, copper, potash, gold and any other element, compound or material as determined by the chair of the National Energy Dominance Council.

Defense Production Act Invocation: The Department of Defense is directed to prioritize critical minerals in its Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment Program. This ensures minerals essential to defense and technology are produced domestically.

Regulatory Reforms: Federal agencies will review regulatory barriers and invite industry to weigh in on reducing red tape and improving efficiency. It also calls on Congress to address the flawed 2018 Arizona district court decision in Center for Biological Diversity et. al. v. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service et. al.

Financial Support for Mining Projects: The EO includes a range of funding, loan and other financing mechanisms to support minerals production and refining, encourage private-sector investment and offer favorable financing terms to reduce production costs and incentivize new projects.

President Trump’s order is poised to address longstanding obstacles to U.S. mining at an unprecedented speed. By increasing domestic minerals production and reducing our dependence on imports, the United States is poised to become a global competitor in the minerals space.

“President Trump’s new executive order confronting China’s minerals weapon isn’t just a step forward; it’s a leap. With a pen stroke, the president has awoken a sleeping giant. American mining is once again center stage—no longer an afterthought to ever-growing reliance on mineral imports from nations that lack the environmental, labor and safety standards that make our industry world-class.” – Rich Nolan

President Trump’s Executive Order represents a much-needed push in the right direction to secure America’s minerals future, combining immediate actions and long-term strategies. Now is the time for the country to align the efforts of the private and public sector to achieve full mineral independence in the United States. (Source) ☼

A New Era for American Science: The Gold Standard is Back

On May 23, 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed a landmark executive order: Restoring Gold Standard Science. This order marks a major turning point in how scientific information is produced, evaluated, and applied across the federal government. It sets a clear and uncompromising standard—scientific integrity is no longer optional. It is foundational.

Rebuilding Trust in Science

Over the last couple of decades, but especially the last five years, confidence in science has plummeted. High-profile instances of data falsification, politicized health guidance, and misuse of worst-case climate scenarios have damaged public faith in government-led science. This executive order directly addresses those failures.

By mandating transparency, objectivity, and rigorous peer review, the order seeks to rebuild trust in the scientific process. It ensures that federally funded research and scientific information used in policy decisions must be credible, reproducible, and subject to open scrutiny. (Read more) ☼

ENERGY

Geothermal Gold Rush: U.S. Digs Deep To Power the Future

Let’s tap the energy bonanza beneath our feet.

by Neil Chatterjee

Chris Wright, President Donald Trump’s new energy secretary, has fervently endorsed geothermal as a way to “energize our country,” and a March study found that geothermal could meet roughly two-thirds of the voracious energy demands of AI datacenters by the early 2030s. (Read more) See some of my Wryheat posts on geothermal energy:

State of geothermal resources in the US

New Source of Geothermal Energy in Western US

Arizona Geological Survey Leads Geothermal Energy Study ☼

Rogue Devices Capable Of Triggering Blackouts Reportedly Found In Chinese Solar Panels (link) ☼

Why “cheaper” wind and solar raise costs. Part I: The fat tail problem

by Planning Engineer (Russ Schussler)

Wind and solar power are often touted as the cheapest sources of electricity in many regions, capable of delivering low-cost energy for the vast majority of the time. At first glance, this might suggest that an energy mix heavily weighted toward renewables would be the most economical choice. However, this assumption overlooks a critical issue: the fat tail problem [Electricity demand fluctuates, and supplying power is far more challenging—and expensive—during certain periods.]. Just because a resource is cheaper most of the time does not mean it reduces overall system costs. This post, the first in a series, explores why prioritizing wind and solar can lead to higher costs, starting with an analogy from the financial world. (Read more) ☼

Why “cheaper” solar raises costs. Part II: The hidden costs of residential solar

by Planning Engineer (Russ Schussler)

In Part 1, we showed how wind and solar’s low costs over 80% of the time are overwhelmed by expenses at peak times such that they offer no cost advantages to the generation mix. Residential solar follows a similar pattern: it seems affordable for homeowners, but raises system costs through rate structures that over-incentivize adoption. Generous subsidies, like retail-rate net metering, drive excessive solar growth, risking grid stability and shifting costs to non-solar customers that are often less affluent. Less generous rates for residential solar slow adoption, but better align solar adoption with grid needs, ensuring fairness and sustainability. (Read more) ☼

Affordable, Reliable, Clean Scorecard: Natural Gas Is Tops, Wind and Solar Are the Worst

by James Taylor

Policymakers on both sides of the political aisle increasingly advocate for affordable, reliable, and clean energy. This is for good reason – modern society requires energy that is affordable and available on demand. Environmental concerns are also very important. Together, affordability, reliability, and cleanliness form the three pillars of ideal energy policy.

Two new analyses evaluate competing electrical power sources and produce an affordable, reliable, and clean scorecard. The two analyses – one published by Northwood University and the Mackinac Center, and the other published by my public policy organization, The Heartland Institute – independently reach near-identical findings.

Both analyses find natural gas is the most affordable, reliable, and clean electrical power source. Not far behind natural gas are nuclear, hydro, and coal. Lagging at the bottom of the affordability scorecard are wind and solar power.

Despite some claims that wind and solar are less expensive than conventional power, the opposite is true. Wind and solar benefit from far more subsidies than other power sources, which merely shift their high costs to taxpayers rather than directly to customers’ electricity bills. Also, the intermittent and often unpredictable nature of wind and solar power impose substantial costs on the grid, requiring other power sources to frequently ramp up and down – quite inefficiently – to cover for the variability of wind and solar. Finally, wind turbines and solar panels must often be built far from population centers, requiring extensive and expensive networks of transmission wires to deliver power to customers. (Read more) ☼

The Achilles Heel of Wind and Solar

by Guy K. Mitchell, Jr.

Sir Isaac Newton published his magnus opus, titled Principia Mathematica, in 1687. In Principia, Newton introduced his three laws of motion — the law of inertia, the law of acceleration, the law of action-reaction — and the law of universal gravitation. It is arguably the greatest scientific work ever published. Principia set the stage for the “Age of Enlightenment” and paved the way for the Scientific Revolution. However, it seems that almost 350 years later, the operators of electric power generation systems utilizing wind turbines and solar voltaic cells in Spain and Portugal neglected to consider the law of inertia in the design of their power grids.

Politics and pseudoscience based on the fraudulent global warming hypothesis should play no role in designing a nation’s power grid. Excessive deployment of wind and solar generators can reduce the reliability of the power grid by decreasing system inertia. (Read more) ☼

What Does It Cost? The Consequences of the Net Zero Energy Agenda

from the Discovery Institute

Lawmakers in Oregon and Washington State have passed ambitious legislation to combat climate change, aiming to eliminate fossil fuels and rely solely on zero-emission electricity sources, such as solar and wind, by 2040 and 2045, respectively.

In this documentary, Ken Peterson explores the devastating economic consequences of this legislation. He explains that electricity prices will increase to exorbitant rates, that the demand for electricity will exceed the abilities of the electrical grid, and that the resulting decrease in global temperature would only be 0.003 °C.

“What Does It Cost?” draws heavily from a report by Jonathan Lesser and Mitch Rolling, which you can review here:

https://www.discovery.org/m/securepdfs/2024/09/Crippling-Costs-of-Electrification-20240918.pdf

(Read more and see video here) ☼

Congrats to Spain! Nation goes 100% renewable as of April 16th 2025! – But…Then Mass Blackouts Hit Spain, Portugal (link) ☼

Built to fail: the silent crisis in green infrastructure

by Neil Probert

Over the past decade, the UK has seen a rapid deployment of renewable energy sites. Solar and wind farms are being rolled out at scale and, on the surface, it’s a clean, green revolution. But step behind the glossy headlines and you’ll find an uncomfortable truth: the power infrastructure supporting these sites is being built to a dangerously low standard. This isn’t just about cutting corners – it’s about systemic failure in how we treat the backbone of renewable power delivery. (Read more) ☼

CLIMATE

A Critique of the Apocalyptic Climate Narrative

by Judith Curry and Harry DeAngelo

The apocalyptic climate narrative is a seriously misleading propaganda tool and a socially destructive guide for public policy. The narrative radically overstates the risks to humanity of continued global warming, which are manageable, not existential. It prescribes large-scale near-term suppression of fossil-fuel use, while failing to recognize the huge costs that such suppression would inflict on humans because fossil fuels are currently irreplaceable inputs for producing food (via ammonia-based fertilizer), steel, cement, and plastics.

The paper details the flaws in the apocalyptic climate narrative, including why the threat from human- caused climate change is not dire and why urgent suppression of fossil-fuel use would be unwise. We argue that sensible public policies would focus instead on developing a diversified portfolio of energy sources to support greater resilience and flexibility to respond to whatever weather and climate extremes that might occur. We identify nine principles for sensible U.S. public policies toward energy and discuss implications of the flaws in the narrative for investors and their agents. (Read more) ☼

Antarctic and Arctic Ice Trends Defy Climate Models And Dire Predictions

by Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt with Pierre Gosselin

New data shows Antarctic ice is growing and Arctic sea ice has stabilized—raising serious questions about climate models and mainstream climate claims. (Read more) ☼

SHOCK CLIMATE REPORT! Urban Heat Islands Responsible for 65% of Global Warming

A new study from the University of Alabama in Huntsville addresses the question of how much the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect is responsible for the higher temperatures at weather stations across the world. Dr. Roy Spencer and Dr. John Christy have spent several years developing a novel method that quantifies, for the first time, the average UHI warming effects related to population density. Their finding: no less than 65% of “runaway global warming” is not caused by our emissions of carbon dioxide, but by the urbanization of the world. (See video) ☼

Volcanoes Spew 3X More CO2 Than Thought & 19,000 New Undersea Volcanoes Found: Is Human-Driven Climate Narrative Crumbling?

By Anthony Watts

Folks, hold onto your hats—two groundbreaking studies dropped this past month, and they’re shaking up everything we thought we knew about carbon dioxide (CO2) in Earth’s atmosphere. The first, from The University of Manchester, reveals that volcanic CO2 emissions could be three times higher than previously estimated. The second, from the School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST), uncovers a staggering 19,325 previously unknown undersea volcanoes. Together, these findings throw a massive wrench into the narrative that human activity is the sole driver of rising atmospheric CO2. Let’s dive in. (Read more) ☼

The New Scientist Is Flat Wrong – We Live in a Golden Age Thanks to a Warmer Climate

by Anthony Watts and H. Sterling Burnett

In a recent article published in The New Scientist (NS), “The everyday ways climate change is already making our lives worse,” the author argues that “climate change is already making our lives worse,” citing a litany of supposed impacts from extreme weather — from increased food prices to disrupted sleep and longer commute times. This narrative is misleading, at best, and outright false in many instances. It ignores the substantial evidence that humanity is currently thriving in a period of unparalleled prosperity, health, and technological advancement. Contrary to the article’s alarmist tone, data suggests that despite localized weather disruptions, global crop yields are at record highs, overall mortality rates from climate-related events have decreased, and adaptive technologies have vastly mitigated potential risks. (Read more) ☼

Climatologist Rebuts ‘Hottest Year Ever’ Claims: ‘Not Even Close’

Climate ‘science’ erased 4,000 years of warmth to make 2024 look like the apocalypse. (Read more) ☼

How Media Exploits Climate Catastrophism

by Vijay Jayaraj

Having abandoned objective reporting, the mainstream media’s refusal to adopt a neutral stance on climate change has transformed a complex scientific debate into a monolithic narrative of impending catastrophe.

Far from being impartial arbiters, media outlets are enthusiastic propagandists recycling doomsday predictions that consistently fail to materialize while ignoring a wealth of scientific research that challenges the narrative of disastrous warming.

This isn’t journalism; it is activism disguised as truth telling. The result? A global populace misled, policymakers swayed by fiction, and developing nations shackled by energy policies that prioritize “green” ideology over human well-being. (Read more) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

by Jonathan DuHamel

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. Submarine volcanoes must be considered when evaluating the causes of climate change. Usually, these changes are regional, not global, however they may have global influences such as changing precipitation patterns as seen with the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO).

By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, we would have freezing temperatures every night.

From wattsupwiththat: Calling carbon dioxide (CO2) a pollutant is a political absurdity. CO2 is essential for photosynthesis the food source of all life beyond bacteria. Cyanobacteria (blue-green bacteria) appeared about 3.5 billion years ago and used photosynthesis to change the world and its atmosphere with the Great Oxidation Event about 2.4 billion years ago causing the extinction of many anaerobic microorganisms. Is oxygen a pollutant? Geologically stable tidal gages show sea level rise has not increased for the last century, and the geological record show the rate of sea level rise has not increased in 8000 years. An increase shown in various satellite instruments is the result of the failure to use control periods to calibrate the instruments with stable tidal gages, a political failure. The physical evidence does not support the claim of intensification of weather events. Such claims are false, and some are pure propaganda.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

Geology and climate – rocks tell the story

The Nonsense of “Net-Zero”

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

See also reports from the Heartland Institute: https://climatechangereconsidered.org/

POLITICS

Energy Department Axes 47 Rules Targeting Appliances, Buildings, and DEI

Secretary Chris Wright says Trump’s deregulatory actions will directly benefit Americans.

by Sean Moran

Energy Secretary Chris Wright on Monday said the Energy Department slashed 47 regulations that put onerous strictures on consumer appliances, placed limits on building and energy production, and doled out taxpayer dollars to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) grants.

“While it would normally take years for the Department of Energy to remove just a handful of regulations, the Trump Administration assembled a team working around the clock to reduce costs and deliver results for the American people in just over 110 days,” Wright said in a statement.

“Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, we are bringing back common sense, slashing regulations meant to appease Green New Deal fantasies, restrict consumer choice, and increase costs for the American people. Promises made, promises kept.” (Read more) ☼

Louisiana Is Among 24 S Superfund’ law States Suing to Block Vermont’s ‘Climate Superfund’ law

Guest Post from The Center Square

Editors’ Note: This post from Nolan McKendry at The Center Square discusses laws enacted in states like Vermont and New York, which are attempting to dictate national energy policy with so-called “Climate Superfund” laws, targeting big oil and gas companies. Twenty-three states and the federal government are suing to overturn the laws and stop a few states from dictating national energy policy, which violates the Constitution’s delegation of the authority to regulate interstate commerce solely to the U.S. Congress. Vermont and the other states with Climate Superfund Laws argue that their states are being impacted by extreme weather due to climate change, and companies that contributed carbon dioxide into the atmosphere should pay. The fact is Vermont is suffering no special impacts from extreme weather that can be scientifically attributed to climate change, as Climate Realism discussed in 2023 post. But, Climate Superfund Laws are likely to cause real damage to energy producers, consumers, and the economy as a whole. (The Center Square) – Louisiana joined 23 states challenging Vermont’s new “Climate Superfund Act,” claiming the law unconstitutionally penalizes consumers and energy companies alike. (Read more) ☼

The Real Issue Preventing Conservative Success

by Bruce Deitrick Price

We have to deal with the deep corruption of K–12 education. Bogus theories and defective methods permeate every minute of the day for most students. So-called Progressive education has largely befuddled traditional education. We have 50 million functional illiterates. The people who did that are weirdly dedicated to destruction…ours. Public schools moved from a focus on academics to being preoccupied with social engineering. The old truths, the old methods, the old standards — all have faded away. K–12 is less demanding, less rigorous. Invariably, students learn less and less each year. (Read more) ☼

Supreme Court: Children of Illegal Aliens or Tourists are not U.S. Citizens (link) ☼

Unmasking the Real Threat to America’s Democracy

by Joseph C. Newtz

America isn’t a democracy but a constitutional republic designed to limit majority rule and protect individual rights. This distortion enables narratives that label dissent as dangerous, especially in portraying Trump as a “threat to democracy” — a claim pushed by institutions caught spreading falsehoods about him. What appears as consensus is actually assigned opinion enforced by media and political power, as “conspiracy theories” used to silence dissent are proving to be true. What follows is not just a list of lies — it’s a pattern of systemic deception that reveals where the real threat lies. (Read more) ☼

“We can always prove a definite theory wrong. Notice however that we never prove it right.” — Richard Feynman (1964)

END

SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 APRIL

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel [email protected]

This issue deals with more real climate science and much needed changes in energy policy.

“There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.” —James Madison (1788)

“If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools.” – Plato

CLIMATE

A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions

Our analysis reveals that human CO2 emissions, constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating negligible long-term atmospheric retention. Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared to unadjusted records. A critical flaw emerges in the IPCC’s reliance on a single, low-variability Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data adjustments. We conclude that the anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms. (Read full study, 16 pages) ☼

See also: Updates On The Collapse Of The Climate Scam This article deals mainly with the EPA’s Endangerment Finding and efforts of people to get it rescinded. ☼

The Sun Is the Main Driver of Climate Change. Not you, Not CO2 (link) ☼

Is Climate Change Real? Short Answer: Yes — But It’s Complicated

by Anthony Watts

First, let’s be clear — climate change is real in the literal sense. The Earth’s climate has been changing for billions of years. We have geological records showing periods that were much warmer (like the Eocene, with crocodiles in the Arctic), and much colder (like the Ice Ages that covered North America in glaciers). Even more recently, we have the Holocene Climate Optimum, significantly warmer than present day.

So, yes — the climate changes, and it always has. The debate isn’t about whether it changes, but why, how fast, and how much humans are influencing it today. The debate is also about how accurately we are able to detect temperature change, plus the overreliance on climate models to predict the future rather than actual data.

Bottom Line: Yes, the climate is changing. It always has. The idea that global climate must be unchanging is simply wrongheaded. The real issue is how much of today’s change is due to human activity, how reliable our predictions are, and whether proposed policy responses are justified — or likely to do more harm than good.

At Watts Up With That, we’ve been pointing out for years that this issue is riddled with confirmation bias, model overconfidence, and selective reporting. There is no justification for shutting down economies or reshaping civilization based on the incomplete science of climate change. (Read more) ☼

Recycling The Same News Every Century

Glacier National Park will be ice-free by: 2030, 2020, 2002, 1961, 1950 (link) ☼

Climate Change Myths Part 1: Polar Bears, Arctic Ice, And Food Shortages

by John Stossel

Real data shows that the climate change fanatics’ catastrophic claims are wrong.

Watch video here. Climate Change Myths Part 2: Wildfires, Drought, Rising Sea Level, and Coral Reefs See Part 2 here. ☼

CLIMATE MADNESS

UK Gov spends £50 m to dim sun to create slightly less beach weather

by Jo Nova

The Gods in the UK Parliament plan to spend £50 million in a quest to control sunlight, because obviously, the UK is too sunny. Also obviously, there is nothing more useful the United Kingdom could spend money on than pie-in-the-sky plans for weather-control. It’s not like people are struggling to heat their homes or put food on the table.

And it’s not like anything could go wrong, or plants use sunlight. It’s not like the UK just installed 1.5 million solar panels on homes and is now paying money to reduce the sunlight falling on them. In the end, this is just another Grow-The-Government-Blob job, but it’s also an escape plan. Wait for it. Twenty years from now, if the world is cooler due to solar activity or cosmic radiation, they’ll say the Geoengineering saved the world from global warming. (Read more) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

by Jonathan DuHamel

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. Submarine volcanoes must be considered when evaluating the causes of climate change. Usually, these changes are regional, not global, however they may have global influences such as changing precipitation patterns as seen with the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO).

By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, we would have freezing temperatures every night.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

Geology and climate – rocks tell the story

The Nonsense of “Net-Zero”

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

See also reports from the Heartland Institute: https://climatechangereconsidered.org/

ENERGY

Trump’s Energy Policies Will Help U.S. Lead in Global AI Race

by David Holt

President Trump’s executive order declaring a national energy emergency signals the fast-track production of more domestic energy. It also promises to generate an equally significant benefit that wasn’t even cited in the EO: Higher energy production will turbocharge our nation’s leadership in artificial intelligence by delivering the huge power supplies AI demands.

Do not underestimate how critically important it is for America to lead the global AI race, especially as China, a potent rival, invests massive resources on AI. The president’s proactive energy strategy can help the U.S. supercharge its AI capabilities and team up with our strategic partners to integrate AI into critical industries and markets. This will prove particularly critical as human-level AI emerges within the next decade.

Already, AI’s rise has triggered breakthroughs in automation, machine learning, and data analytics that are revolutionizing the manufacturing, finance, healthcare, transportation, retail and other major industries – not to mention the tech industry itself. (Read more) ☼

Geothermal electricity generation

by Chris Morris

Geothermal power stations are mature technology with proven performance, reliable operation and ideal for baseload generation. The units are synchronous, so they support the grid. The production from them is considered by most to be renewable. They do not use fossil fuels to provide the heat. It is not “carbon free,” but no generation truly is. It has a relatively small footprint, environment harm is low, and it can coexist with farming or industrial development. Most developments have a cheaper energy cost than onshore wind, using published accounts for analysis. For countries or areas where the resource is there, geothermal generation is very viable. This resource occurs in particular geologic environments, as explained below. (Read more) ☼

Offshore Wind: GAO Report Reveals the Fallout of Biden’s Green Industrial Gamble

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) just issued a comprehensive review of the Department of the Interior’s offshore wind energy program. Titled “Offshore Wind Energy: Actions Needed to Address Gaps in Interior’s Oversight of Development” (GAO-25-106998), the report provides a postmortem of sorts on a policy agenda that—until recently—was speeding ahead under the Biden administration with the vigor of a runaway freight train. Today, under President Trump’s 2025 executive orders, the brakes have been applied. No new leasing. No new permits. A full federal review is underway. But this report serves as a sobering account of how rapidly U.S. federal agencies pursued offshore wind energy projects with insufficient oversight, unanswered environmental questions, and minimal accountability to affected communities. (Read more) ☼

Utilities Are Going All-In on Leftist Net-Zero Agenda at Ratepayers’ Expense

Read this report from the Heartland Institute (15 pages). ☼

New York Could Save New Englanders $1B If It Stopped Blocking A Natural Gas Pipeline

(link to story) ☼

The Golden State Is Strangling Energy Companies—Experts Warn Drivers Will Pay

by Kevin Killough

Valero Energy Corporation has announced it will idle or close its Benicia Refinery in California, just the latest in the exodus of fossil fuel companies from the state. Six months ago, Phillips 66 announced the closure of its Los Angeles-area refinery by the end of this year – it’s since bumped the date up to October — and a few months before that, Chevron announced it would be moving its headquarters from San Ramon, California, to Houston. After the two refineries close, it’s not clear exactly where California will find more gasoline and other finished petroleum products, such as jet fuel, to satisfy demand. (Read more) [Note: closure of the refineries will also effect price and availability of gasoline in Arizona and Nevada.]☼

The Feds are Hiding the Eagle Death Data

by David Wojick

Imagine there is an industry product that is killing thousands a year and the number is growing. The government is tracking it closely, while keeping the data secret in order to protect the product. Outrageous, right? But that is exactly the case with wind power killing eagles. The FWS eagle kill data is all a big government secret designed to protect the wind industry from public outrage. This has to stop. (Read more) ☼

The Myth of a Hydrogen Economy

by Seth Cressey

My new book No Son, There Won’t Be a Hydrogen Economy is a data-driven critique of the growing hype surrounding hydrogen as a future energy source. Its central argument: while hydrogen may have limited industrial and aerospace applications, the broader vision of a global “hydrogen economy” is fundamentally flawed—technically, economically, and especially environmentally.

The book dispels the prospects of hydrogen as a miracle climate solution. While hydrogen combustion or fuel cell use does not emit carbon dioxide (CO ), hydrogen itself is not a primary energy source but an energy carrier. It must be produced using other forms of energy, typically through steam methane reforming (SMR) or electrolysis. Both methods are energy-intensive and often powered by fossil fuels. (Read more) ☼

Solar Alert! Rooftop Decay, Facility Decommissioning

by Robert Bradley Jr.

“This is where the next frontier of solar energy lies—not in installing the next 100GW—it’s rescuing the first 100GW.” – Cesar Barbosa. And you thought that owning a Tesla was ecological …. Imagine that solar roof that now needs attention with the installer AWOL. The solar industry is about to become the least popular in the U.S. with hundreds of thousands of disappointed customers. (Read more) ☼

ENVIRONMENT

Two new studies imply the Golden Eagle cannot survive more wind turbines (link) ☼

Ten Environmentalist Myths

by Edward Ring

Here are ten issues where environmentalism has been misused, with consequences that have either been of no benefit whatsoever to the environment or have even caused harm. (Read more) ☼

Study: Ancient Megafloods Dwarf Today’s Extremes — But You Won’t Hear That on the Evening News

by Anthony Watts

New paleo evidence reveals floods in Earth’s past that were hundreds of times larger than anything we’ve seen recently — and had nothing to do with CO2.

The media’s appetite for climate catastrophe never seems to get full. Virtually every flood event now comes packaged with breathless declarations of “unprecedented” intensity and grim warnings of fossil-fueled doom. But a new study covered by Phys.org just threw a mammoth-sized monkey wrench into that narrative — quite literally.

Researchers examining paleoflood evidence in the Pacific Northwest have found that ancient deluges during the last Ice Age were not just bigger, they were so massive that they make modern floods look like puddle-jumping. In some cases, peak discharges exceeded 10 million cubic meters per second, compared to just tens of thousands for modern floods — including extreme ones like the 1993 Mississippi River flood.

Let’s be clear: these were natural events, happening 12,000 to 18,000 years ago, long before coal plants, internal combustion engines, or UN climate conferences. (Read more) ☼

‘Electric Vehicles: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly’ Exposes The Dark Side Of EVs

A new documentary by Larry Elder challenges the claimed environmental benefits of EVs over gas-powered cars. (Read more) ☼

STATE OF THE UNION

Can Trump Kill This $2.2 Trillion Regulatory Beast?

by I & I Editorial Board

Gutting the regulatory state would free up massive amounts of pent-up economic energy, raise standards of living, lower inflation, and sharply cut the deficit, without unduly harming anyone (except busybody bureaucrats).

It’s hard to fathom just how gargantuan and intrusive the regulatory state has become over the past 100 years. Even the Times seems surprised, noting that “more than 400 federal agencies … regulate almost every aspect of American life.”

But that barely scratches the surface. Thursday, the Competitive Enterprise Institute released its annual “10,000 Commandments” report, which tracks the regulatory Leviathan. CEI calculates that the annual cost of complying with federal regulations is now $2.155 trillion.

Let’s put that in some context.

That’s nearly four times what corporations pay in federal income taxes.

It’s the equivalent of a $16,061 hidden tax on every U.S. household, notes CEI. That’s more than the average household pays for food, or health care, or transportation, or clothes.

The Federal Register, where all federal rules and regulations are printed, now takes more than 106,000 pages to hold the 98 million words issued by unelected bureaucrats.

If U.S. regulations were a country, it would be the world’s 8th-largest in the world — bigger than Canada.

Trump tried to weed out some of the regulatory underbrush in his first term, but he got a late start, and Joe Biden reversed course on many of the gains Trump managed. This time, Trump is better prepared, better armed, and far more aggressive.

Normally, eliminating a regulation is a cumbersome process that requires a federal agency to write an entirely new rule justifying why it’s getting rid of the old one. The process can take years and guarantees legal challenges.

Trump doesn’t want to wait that long. He directed federal agencies to produce a list by this week of regulations they want to eliminate, and plans to employ “a set of novel legal strategies … to simply repeal or just stop enforcing regulations,” as the Times puts it. (Read more) ☼

On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’

by Spencer P. Morrison

President Trump has deemed April 2 to be ‘Liberation Day’ for America. He is set to impose sweeping reciprocal tariffs on America’s trading partners, which are hoped to level the playing field between America’s free enterprise and foreign state-backed rivals.

Liberation Day ought to be celebrated alongside Independence Day. Why? Money and power are two sides of the same coin. Without economic independence, such as the ability to manufacture steel, automobiles, and computers, we cannot long defend our political independence. Tariffs are not simply a tax, they are necessary for America’s industrial policy and national security. (Read more) ☼

Celebrating American Independence With an All-Out Assault on Anti-Constitutional Climate Measures

by Kevin Mooney

Now is the time to double down against the “Climate-Industrial Complex” with accelerated regulatory reforms that will hopefully endure beyond Donald Trump’s second term. Since day one of his new administration, the president has moved quickly to keep his promise to unleash American energy.

This means unraveling climate policies based on specious, unscientific findings that reached an apex with whatever leftist committee was in charge of the Biden White House. The American Energy Alliance, a Washington-based free market advocacy group, has put together a list of 50 Actions the Trump administration and congressional Republicans have taken to maximize America’s energy potential. (Read more) ☼

Trump’s Climate Policy Shift Could Save American Farmers from Disaster

by Vijay Jayaraj

While news about President Trump’s tariffs and crackdowns on the questionable financial management of federal agencies has dominated media reports in recent weeks, a quiet transformation has been under way in agricultural policy.

An order to remove climate change references from U.S. Department of Agriculture websites signals a departure from the red tape of climate regulations on domestic farming practices and strings attached to U.S. support of agriculture abroad.

Trump’s withdrawal from international climate initiatives, including the U.N.’s Paris Climate Accords, marked a win for American farmers and taxpayers. His decision ended U.S. participation in costly and unrealistic mandates — such as the Net Zero agenda — that have strained global economies and fueled unrest among farmers and the broader public. (Read more) ☼

Trump Increases Logging Quota 25% To Prevent Fires, Bolster Logging Industry (link) ☼

“Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny” – Thomas Jefferson

END

SCIENCE, CLIMATE, ENERGY AND POLITICAL NEWS ROUNDUP 2025 MARCH

A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues

Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel [email protected]

Richard Feynman famously stated, “It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong.”

CLIMATE

A Simplified Explanation of Climate Science for Policymakers and High School and University-level Science Students – 30 pages (link) ☼

Study Destroys Basis of EPA Climate Regulations

by Vijay Jayaraj

For two decades, the public has been bombarded with dire warnings of an impending climate-induced agricultural apocalypse. The claim is that a climate warmed excessively by the carbon dioxide emissions of human activity will ravage the food supply and plunge humanity into famine and chaos.

For many reasons, none of this ever made sense. Now, a new study published in Scientific Reports has turned this narrative of catastrophe on its head, revealing that a global temperature rise of even 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit) would not reduce crop yields—and might even increase harvests. (Read more) ☼

Carbon Dioxide Saturation in the Atmosphere

by Anthony Watts

Key Takeaways:

Adding more carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere will have virtually no additional impact on planetary temperatures.

CO2 can absorb longwave radiation, which translates to retained warmth in only certain parts of the atmospheric spectrum and in finite amounts.

Atmospheric CO2 has already reached 99 percent of its potential saturation level for absorbing warmth.

More CO2 in the atmosphere will have virtually no impact on future temperatures, as near-saturation for absorbing warmth has already occurred.

Restricting or phasing out conventional energy will do nothing for global temperatures and is scientifically pointless. (Read more) ☼

Report: 1900 Scientists Say ‘Climate Change Not Caused by CO2’ – The Real Environment Movement Was Hijacked

by Marc Morano

Summary

In summary, CO2 reduction is the main focus of the UN-promoted climate-change-hysteria that has been rampant among the world’s population. However, the proclaimed climate crisis exists in computer models only. The cult of ‘manmade climate change’ is a media and UN politically-promoted ‘ideology’, that is used for a wider political and corporate agenda. Manmade climate change is not based in fact, and has hijacked real environmental concerns.

Due to incessant UN, government, and corporate-promoted climate change propaganda, many people are, thus, in a media-induced state of confusion, and, thus, blindly assume their pre-determined role in society under this ‘dictatorship of words’ without even being aware of it. The unpalatable reality is that people’s access to energy and resources is being intentionally reduced via bogus climate change policies, inflation, ongoing geo-political theatre and intentionally instigated war.

We cannot understand how to create a truly resilient society unless we correctly perceive the current society we live in and how it came to exist. Unless we recognize the untruths of the current paradigm, even if it is not ‘politically correct’ to do so, then we will not be able to make the correct adjustments to our communities and local/regional networks, or create a truly resilient thriving society. In this spirit of truth, new networks are emerging worldwide. (Read more of this long article) ☼

PBS Pushes Climate Doom, Ignores Real Data Debunking Global Warming Hysteria (link) ☼ 

Trump Strikes at the Heart of the Climate Change Agenda by Attacking CO2 ‘Pollution’ Claim

by Chris Morrison 

Eight billion humans living on the Earth breathe out two pounds of carbon dioxide every day, yet Net Zero fanatics have long argued that this gas of all planetary life is a pollutant. Despite all the observable evidence going back at least 600 million years, the activists link increasing levels of the gas to runaway high temperatures and concoct a politically-inspired story that suggests that humans control a chaotic and non-linear climate. Their computer models tell them so, particularly when provided with all the correct data. One vital cornerstone of all this nonsense is an ‘Endangerment Finding’ from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that in 2009 termed CO2 a ‘pollutant’ of something termed clean air. The pollution scare has been influential around the world and has been used to justify countless regulations and bans in the interest of the Net Zero fantasy. Such is the totemic nature of this finding it is perhaps not surprising that it hasn’t taken long for the Trump Administration to strike at the heart of the Green Blob with the new head of the EPA reported to be urging the White House to rescind the ruling.

Back in 2007, the EPA charged that greenhouse gases “endangered both the public health and the public welfare of current and future generations”. It said that emissions from motor vehicles contributed to greenhouse gas “air pollution” that endangered public health and welfare under the Clean Air Act. The science was suspect then, it is even more dodgy now. (Read more) ☼

MSM Ignore New Research Confirming Ocean Currents Are Stable

Real-world data shatters media hysteria over ocean current collapse.

by Anthony Watts

For decades, mainstream media outlets have asserted that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is on the verge of collapse, bringing catastrophic consequences to the planet. This is false. Recent research indicates that climate change has not altered the Atlantic Ocean current, despite repeated claims by the media and some supposed experts to the contrary.  (Read more) ☼

New Study: 2000 Km Of Antarctic Ice-Covered Coastline Has Grown Slightly Over Past 85 Years!

By P Gosselin

Forgotten aerial photos from 1937 have given researchers at the University of Copenhagen the most detailed picture of the ice evolution in East Antarctica to date. The results of a comprehensive analysis: The ice has remained stable and even grown slightly over almost a century. (Read more) ☼

New Study Casts Doubt On The Accuracy And Reliability Of The Modern And Paleo CO2 Record

by Kenneth Richard

Reconstructed ice core CO2 values and modern CO2 and CH4 measurements do not support the narrative that human emissions are driving changes in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. (Read more) ☼

Greenland Temperature Study Challenges Climate Narratives: The Data Speaks

Recent analysis of MODIS satellite data (2000–2019) reveals Greenland’s surface temperatures remained remarkably stable, challenging narratives of rapid Arctic warming. The study, covering 31,464 observations across 36 sub-regions, found minimal long-term trends—only a slight cooling of ~0.05°C per decade, with three of four regions showing no significant change and the South region cooling slightly. This contrasts with expectations of accelerated warming, though seasonal patterns remained consistent. (Read more and see video) ☼

Sahara Desert Shows Abrupt Extreme Climate Change Is Natural, Nothing Human About It.

by P Gosselin

Abrupt, dramatic climate changes happen naturally. Scientists find Sahara went from green to parched in just a matter of decades. (Read more) ☼

AI Study Undercuts IPCC Claims: CO2’s Role in Warming Grossly Overstated

by Lynne Balzer

An analysis of climate data by the respected AI Grok 3 beta verifies that the hype that’s been promoted by the media and other climate change activists for the past forty years is just plain incorrect. A March 21, 2025, press release details how this analysis was guided by Jonathan Cohler, Dr. David R. Legates (Professor Emeritus, University of Delaware), Dr. Willie Soon (Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, Hungary), and Franklin Soon. Grok 3 beta questions whether carbon dioxide emissions released by humanity have been responsible for the slight warming we’ve experienced in the past 175 years.

This amazing study, “A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-

Global Warming Hypothesis” was published in the journal Science of Climate Change.

It concluded that such warming is caused mainly by changes in solar output and other natural causes. (Read more) ☼

Climate Doomsday Predictions That Flopped Spectacularly (link) ☼

CLIMATE SCIENCE BACKGROUND:

by Jonathan DuHamel

Geologic evidence shows that Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of flux for more than 4 billion years. Nothing we do can stop that. Much of current climate and energy policy is based upon the erroneous assumption that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which make up just 0.1% of total greenhouse gases, are responsible for “dangerous” global warming/climate change. There is no physical evidence to support that assumption. Man-made carbon dioxide emissions have no significant effect on global temperature/climate. In fact, when there is an apparent correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been shown to follow, not lead, changes in Earth’s temperature. All efforts to reduce emissions are futile with regard to climate change, but such efforts will impose massive economic harm to Western Nations. The “climate crisis” is a scam. U.N officials have admitted that their climate policy is about money and power and destroying capitalism, not about climate. Submarine volcanoes must be considered when evaluating the causes of climate change. Usually, these changes are regional, not global, however they may have global influences such as changing precipitation patterns as seen with the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO).

By the way, like all planetary bodies, the earth loses heat through infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases interfere with (block) some of this heat loss. Greenhouse gases don’t warm the Earth, they slow the cooling. If there were no greenhouse gases, we would have freezing temperatures every night.

For more on climate science, see my Wryheat Climate articles:

Geology and climate – rocks tell the story

The Nonsense of “Net-Zero”

Climate Change in Perspective

A Review of the state of Climate Science

The Broken Greenhouse – Why Co2 Is a Minor Player in Global Climate

A Summary of Earth’s Climate History-a Geologist’s View

Problems with wind and solar generation of electricity – a review

The High Cost of Electricity from Wind and Solar Generation

The “Social Cost of Carbon” Scam Revisited

ATMOSPHERIC CO2: a boon for the biosphere

Carbon dioxide is necessary for life on Earth

Impact of the Paris Climate Accord and why Trump was right to drop it

Six Issues the Promoters of the Green New Deal Have Overlooked

Why reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel will have no effect on climate ☼

See also reports from the Heartland Institute: https://climatechangereconsidered.org/

ENERGY

Lift the veil on wind power killing eagles

by David Wojick

Every land based wind facility in America has a permit to kill a certain number of eagles every year. What these kill numbers add up to is a secret that should be public information. Is it hundreds, thousands or tens of thousands? First the basics. CFACT collegian Maggie Immen puts the issue well in comments on a proposed Wyoming wind facility. She writes this:

“Wind turbines are a documented threat to bird populations, particularly raptors like golden and bald eagles. Estimates suggest that wind farms kill at least 150,000 birds annually in the U.S. alone. Wyoming, a crucial migratory corridor, is especially vulnerable. (Read more) ☼

Much Harm and No Good from EPA Greenhouse Rule: Kill It

by Vijay Jayaraj

Having declared carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) to be harmful pollutants, the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) 2009 endangerment finding has been the cornerstone of wrongheaded climate regulation, an impediment to economic growth and destroyer of livelihoods. All the result of rulemaking that puts ideology ahead of science.

Empowered to impose sweeping restrictions on GHG emissions from all manner of human activity, the EPA has been free to impose unreasonable demands on electric generation, transportation, manufacturing and agriculture – just to name more prominent targets. Under the Obama and Biden administrations, with CO2 emissions being the focus, fossil fuels in general and coal in particular were hammered by this regulatory cudgel.

In the last decade, regulations have contributed to the closing of more than 40 percent of the nation’s coal-fired power plants – one of the most economical and reliable generators of electricity. Job losses hit thousands of plant workers, coal miners and employees of supporting businesses, and both the price of electricity and the risk of blackouts increased. (Read more) ☼

Yes, Coal and Natural Gas are Much Cheaper Than Wind and Solar

by James Taylor

Renewable power advocates often claim wind and solar are less expensive energy sources than coal, natural gas, and nuclear power. Such a claim begs the question of why the heavily subsidized Ivanpah solar power facility is going out of business, following a long line of other renewable energy project bankruptcies. Also, why would most of the world continue to build coal power plants if it is more expensive than wind and solar? The answer is wind and solar are expensive, financial losers. A recent peer-reviewed analysis proves that point.

A recent study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Energy, reports on the full-system levelized cost of electricity generation. The term “full-system” is key. Many entities have assessed what it costs utilities to purchase or produce electricity from existing sources and deliver it to customers. These cost assessments, however, ignore the intermittency of wind and solar and how intermittency adds substantial costs to the entire electric grid. The cost assessments also fail to account for how wind and solar projects cannot be built just anywhere and often require new, long, expensive, and inefficient transformation lines to deliver power from the generation locations to consumers. This also adds substantial costs to the overall electric grid. (Read more) ☼

The Coal Fleet Can Underpin the Energy Abundance Agenda

by Rich Nolan

The U.S. needs more dispatchable electricity—and we need it immediately. Power demand is exploding across the country at the very moment the nation’s grid reliability is teetering on the edge of catastrophe. Using more coal is the answer to this problem. (Read more) ☼

Big Oil Shifts Funding Away From Green Energy Companies, But Will It Last?

by Linnea Lueken

For years, groups like the Heartland Institute, CFACT, and other climate and energy realists have been accused of receiving large amounts of money from Big Oil to promote traditional energy sources. This is not the case, of course, but you know who has been getting big bucks from Big Oil? So-called renewable energy companies and sundry climate alarmist groups.

In fact, about $1 billion annually flows to green groups from oil and gas companies via the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI), which includes contributing members like BP, Chevron, Equinor, Exxon Mobil, Occidental, and others.

It has been constantly irritating to see these companies toe the line for Big Green, a trillion-dollar industry itself that is costing the rest of us rather than helping.

Moreover, the entire renewable energy industry is built on falsehoods and alarmism, and, lest we forget — a ton of taxpayer dollars.

Recent news that BP and other multinational energy companies are cooling their affections toward renewables and green investment is causing panic among the usual climate scam pushers.

Hopefully, this marks a permanent shift towards sound science and climate realism from our largest energy producers. However, only time will tell. (Read more) ☼

Strangling Our Economy:’ Report Shows Net Zero Hampers Growth, Doesn’t Lower Emissions

The result of the UK’s decarbonization efforts appears to be weak economic growth, stalling living standards, high energy prices and deindustrialization – without denting rising global emissions. (Read more) ☼

ENVIRONMENT

Origins of the Chemtrail Theory by Dr. Roy Spencer (link)

Visible cloud streaks left behind traveling jets are “contrails” but conspiracies allege that these contrails may be used to spread dangerous chemicals. ☼

ECONOMY

America’s copper supplies are running out

By Ronald Beaty

From the wires powering our homes to the batteries propelling electric vehicles (EVs), an adequate supply of copper is indispensable. Yet as demand surges — projected to double by 2035 to meet net-zero mandates if they are continued — the United States is running low on its vital copper supplies. Our mines churn out 1.1 million metric tons annually, meeting 69% of domestic need. However, aging operations and a labyrinth of red tape threaten to cede our copper crown to foreign powers. (Read more) ☼

Texas is going big on desalination

by Duggan Flanakin

The old saw, “Everything is bigger in Texas,” may soon be coming true once again, as the Nueces River Authority has revealed plans for a deepwater desalination plant off Harbor Island near Corpus Christi that would immediately become the nation’s largest – and with planned expansions by 2070, larger than all but two of the world’s existing desalination plants.

Desalination today provides potable water to billions of people worldwide, with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Israel, and other Middle Eastern countries leading the way. The world’s largest, Ras at Khair in Saudi Arabia, has a capacity of 228 million Imperial gallons per day (MIGD). (Read more) ☼

New Study: Inflation Reduction Act Likely To Cost Taxpayers Trillions

by Kevin Killough

When former President Joe Biden’s signature Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) passed in 2022, it did so along party lines with not a single Republican voting for it. At the time, a Senate one-pager summarized the law as costing taxpayers $369 billion, based on Congressional Budget Review (CBO) estimates. A new study from the Cato Institute finds that the law could cost as much as $4.67 trillion by 2050. That’s roughly 12 times the stated cost. The study also concludes that the subsidies are undermining innovation and driving investments toward subsidy farming rather than satisfying consumer demand. (Read more) ☼

STATE OF THE UNION

Changing of the Guard:

EPA Unleashes 31 Actions To Overturn Biden- and Obama-Era Regulations, Boost American Power (link) ☼

EPA Battles America’s Most Destructive Regulatory Action: The Endangerment Finding (link) ☼

Pentagon Dumps Climate Crusade ‘Crap’, Shifts Focus To Warfighting (link) ☼

‘Follow The Money’: How Climate Bureaucrats Are Robbing Taxpayers Blind (link) ☼

South Dakota Bans Using Eminent Domain For Carbon Dioxide Pipelines (link) ☼

The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For

by Charlton Allen

Washington is an empire of unaccountable money. The real power in this town isn’t in campaign speeches or election-night victories—it’s in the quiet flow of taxpayer dollars into the right hands, far from public view. And while Americans were struggling with inflation, border chaos, and a volatile global stage, the Biden administration quietly orchestrated one of the most audacious financial maneuvers in modern history: a $20 billion green-energy slush fund, funneled to handpicked left-wing nonprofits with no meaningful oversight. (Read more) ☼

MEDIA ADVISORY: President Trump’s Embrace of Coal-powered Energy Is ‘the Right Thing for America’ (link ) ☼

 

END