Apoyamos a Ucrania para ayudar a proteger a las personas. Únete
ES
Cuando compras a través de los enlaces de nuestro sitio, podemos recibir una comisión de afiliado

Deep para Mac

Buscador/navegador de imágenes, búsqueda única basada en color.

3.2
Basado en 5 valoraciones de usuarios

Resumen de Deep

Deep tiene la capacidad única de encontrar imágenes basadas en color. También te permite buscar por etiqueta, ubicación, calificación, tamaño y relación de aspecto. Las imágenes pueden ser etiquetadas.

Deep calcula el rango de colores utilizados en cada una de tus imágenes analizando los píxeles y calculando los colores más populares. Esto es lo que hace que las paletas en Deep sean poderosas, puedes encontrar imágenes que tienen colores similares, lo cual es genial cuando buscas la imagen perfecta para tu sitio web. De hecho, simplemente arrastra cualquier imagen a Deep y encontrará y clasificará todas las imágenes en tu computadora que son similares.

Totalmente integrado con OS X 10.9 Mavericks.

Novedades de la versión 1.5.4

Versión 1.5.4:

Nota: Ahora requiere OS X 10.8.2 o posterior.

  • Las notas de la versión no estaban disponibles cuando se actualizó este listado.
Ver versiones anteriores de Deep

Deep para Mac

$12.99
Versión 1.5.4
Escribe una reseña detallada sobre Deep

Escribe lo que piensas en nuestro comentario de toda la vida

Política de comentarios de MacUpdate. Te animamos a dejar comentarios, pero los que incluyan insultos, acoso o ataques personales de cualquier tipo serán moderados.
3.2

(6 reseñas de Deep)

  • Comentarios

  • Valoraciones de usuarios

JoeG9239
JoeG9239
Jun 10, 2015
1.5.4
3.0
Jun 10, 2015
3.0
Version: 1.5.4
It's a nice idea, but a no go if you suffer from motion sickness. They really need to make the dizzying coverflow effect optional and allow people to view the images as a flat presentation.
Levelbest
Levelbest
Nov 19, 2012
1.4.3
0.0
Nov 19, 2012
0.0
Version: 1.4.3
I have to admit, I have a love-hate relationship with this software and Ironic. I thrilled when I discovered Leap, Deep and Fresh. I still use Fresh everyday. Deep will not update so I am still running 1.2.2. Now I see there is a 1.4.3 version out. As this area is about Deep all I can say is that I have felt it abandoned for a long time, which is sad because even my older version is a great idea and well done. Now, to support the negative comments about Ironic (no tantrums here, just truth). Leap used to have a well ordered tag list. Then the developers decided on their own (many users besides me gave negative feedback on the forums about the change they made) that the tags in Leap should be in a cloud. Very hard for me to make them out that way. Organizing is the point of buying Leap, isn't it? And if they change it so you get your brain around it, by making they tag list into a jumble of words (a cloud) whats the point there? Anyway, I finally left all ironic products save Fresh. And it really is a pity because they really do need to have better support with the regular users. Yes, I have said all this many times before on the Ironic forums, to no avail.
anonymous-tapir-4715
anonymous-tapir-4715
Jan 11, 2009
1.0
5.0
Jan 11, 2009
5.0
Version: 1.0
What a joy! Beautiful set up, all the images and photos on my computer in a flow better than cover flow ... and by color, shade. Amazing Nothing like it. This painter says, Awesome!
Ronaldjohn
Ronaldjohn
Jan 5, 2009
1.0
0.0
Jan 5, 2009
0.0
Version: 1.0
The only conclusions one can derive from developers who leave trusting customers hopelessly adrift with their binary waste products is they are either poor coders, have lost their Riddlin or find some kind of perverse enjoyment selling things that don't work. These are the same people who are responsible for Leap, a tagging travesty in my experience. If you care to you can read about the joy that product has brought into my life over on the Leap page but no matter, I would caution anyone to be careful with any developers who fails to get the basics of one project completed before moving on to others. Shame on you Ironic software.
hmurchison
hmurchison
Dec 10, 2008
1.0
0.0
Dec 10, 2008
0.0
Version: 1.0
Seems like a good start. I'm getting the feeling that it's not going to become truly effective unti there's a 2.0 release. I'd like some way of controlling the initial batch logging procedure so it's not pulling up useless pics cached from the installed browsers. It should use Quick Look (though it does show larger versions of "cliked" pics). No keep in mind this is just my first brief run through of the UI. I could be missing a lot of hidden functionality.
sfkev
sfkev
Dec 31, 2016
3.5
Dec 31, 2016
3.5
Version: null
JoeG9239
JoeG9239
Jun 10, 2015
3.0
Jun 10, 2015
3.0
Version: null
elisaVie
elisaVie
Dec 11, 2012
2.0
Dec 11, 2012
2.0
Version: null
Pmdf
Pmdf
Mar 23, 2011
2.5
Mar 23, 2011
2.5
Version: null
anonymous-tapir-4715
anonymous-tapir-4715
Jan 11, 2009
5.0
Jan 11, 2009
5.0
Version: null