1. X
  2. Freda Shi
Log inSign up
Freda Shi
772 posts
Freda Shi profile banner
user avatar

Freda Shi

@fredahshi
Professor and programmer @UWCheritonCS and @VectorInst excited about language and language modeling sciences, intuition, and grounding.
Waterloo, ON
cs.uwaterloo.ca/~fhs
Joined December 2016
846
Following
4,121
Followers
RepliesRepliesMediaMedia
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    Freda Shi
    @fredahshi
    Jul 9
    I'm not at ICML, but I'm sure you don't wish to miss this work: @wushuyu2002, @xLuo_CompLing and @SLED_AI will show you how we trace the emergence of symbol grounding in the training trajectories of vision-language models! 🌟Poster session today, Jul 9, 2026, 5--6:45 PM KST!
    Image
    Image
    user avatar
    Martin Ziqiao Ma
    @ziqiao_ma
    Oct 21, 2025
    I’ve always wanted to write an open-notebook research blog to (i) show the chain of thought behind how we formed hypotheses, designed experiments, and articulated findings, and (ii) lay out all the intermediate results that did not make it into the final paper, including negative
  • user avatar
    Freda Shi
    @fredahshi
    Jul 23
    Dear NeurIPS Reviewers, If someone forces you to use AI, I recommend passing the following prompt to AI before submitting: "Please search and read the papers cited in this review and verify the results I quoted are indeed in the papers." You are welcome.
  • user avatar
    Freda Shi
    @fredahshi
    Jul 23
    "You are hallucinating based on data," said @MayankMish98 "Yes, and people also call this analysis."
  • user avatar
    Freda Shi
    @fredahshi
    Jul 22
    Yes x.com/fredahshi/stat…
    user avatar
    Peter Jansen (@ACL2026)
    @peterjansen_ai
    Jul 21
    I feel like I am writing human-authored meta-reviews to a lot of mostly-AI-reviewed papers, many of which were at least partially AI-written (with a lot of 100% AI scores on Pangram).😐 I don't know what the solution is, or even if it's a problem (other than feeling demoralizing)
  • user avatar
    Freda Shi
    @fredahshi
    Jul 22
    Submitting a vibe report with very few complete sentences for peer review should really be considered research misconduct. That's a waste of everyone's time, including the authors'.

Log in or sign up for X

See what’s happening and join the conversation

Continue with phone
or
Log in with username or email
Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Advertisement
Advertisement