The Role of Leadership in the Software Development Lifecycle

Great engineering leadership isn’t about solving everything. It’s about creating the conditions where your team can. In my early leadership days, I thought I had to walk in with the answers. Over time, I learned something better: Most engineers don’t need hand-holding. They need clarity, context, and trust. Here’s how I lead now (and what’s worked): 1. Present the problem, not a pre-baked solution. → Engineers are problem-solvers. Don’t rob them of that. → Instead of “We need to use Kafka here,” say: “We need async processing at scale. Thoughts?” 2. Share constraints early. → Be open about deadlines, budget, team bandwidth, or tech debt. → Constraints help the team make realistic design choices. 3. Make room for trade-off discussions. → Your job isn’t to rush decisions. It’s to ensure good ones. → Let the team think through latency vs cost, monolith vs microservices, etc. 4. Guide the decision, don’t dictate it. → Ask: “What risks do you see?” or “What’s your fallback plan?” → Step in only when clarity or urgency is needed. 5. Protect builder time. → Cut unnecessary meetings. Shield them from noise. → Innovation dies in a calendar full of status syncs. Leadership is knowing when to speak and when to listen. You don’t earn trust by having all the answers. You earn it by helping your team find better ones.

My Principles for Being a Hands-On Engineering Leader As I've grown from an IC to leading engineering teams at scale, I've developed strong beliefs about technical leadership. The "founder mode" discussions that swept through leadership circles few months ago made me reflect on my own philosophy as an engineering executive. Here's what I believe: Engineering leaders must maintain technical credibility while focusing on strategic impact. My core principles: 🔹 Leaders should deeply understand system architectures and technology stacks to make informed strategic decisions 🔹I actively participate in design reviews, not to dictate solutions but to ask probing questions that surface hidden risks 🔹I maintain enough technical currency to evaluate emerging technologies against our business needs 🔹Know your system health dashboards - when incidents occur, I can step in with the technical context to drive effective resolution 🔹Occasionally, I'll dive deep to unblock critical initiatives or validate concerns when truly needed The balance shifts dramatically with company stage - in early startups, everyone - with AI tools literally everyone - is coding. At 15+ engineers, I think the manager shifts from coding to being in the code. As the team grows beyond 35, focus shifts primarily to architecture, strategy and organizational design. What's been transformative recently is how AI tools have helped me quickly understand codebases, analyze incident channel chatter, and digest detailed design docs. They've become an essential part of staying technically connected while scaling my impact. Being "hands-on" isn't about writing code daily—it's about maintaining enough technical insight to provide valuable guidance while creating space for your team to execute and grow. What principles guide your technical leadership approach? #EngineeringLeadership #TechnicalLeadership #EngineeringCulture

The Hidden Shift Every Engineering Manager Must Face When I transitioned into engineering management at Microsoft , I thought the key to success was rooted in my technical expertise. After all, I had spent years mastering code, designing solutions, and owning deliverables. But soon, I learned a lesson that reshaped my entire career. Early in my new role, I tackled the team’s technical challenges head-on, diving into problem-solving the same way I did as an engineer. Yet something felt off. Despite delivering solutions, I noticed gaps in team morale, alignment, and overall performance. One day, a mentor pulled me aside and said something that stuck with me: “You’re solving the wrong problems. Your job isn’t to code the solution—it’s to build the team that can do it better than you ever could.” That was my wake-up call. I realized that engineering management is 80% people and 20% engineering. My real role wasn’t just in technical delivery—it was in unlocking the potential of my team, fostering trust, and building alignment. Here’s what I wish I had known from the start: • Engineering management is about translation, not execution. Your primary task is to bridge strategy with systems, ensuring your team is aligned to business outcomes. • Your technical skills take a back seat to your leadership skills. You need to guide, coach, and empower—not micromanage. • Conflict resolution becomes more important than debugging code. Navigating team dynamics is the new challenge. At Amazon Connect today, I carry forward these lessons. The technical wins still matter, but the true legacy lies in the people I help grow and the culture I help shape. So here’s my question to you: What was your wake-up call when transitioning into leadership? What lesson reshaped how you approach your role? Let’s share our insights—because leadership, like engineering, is a skill you can always refine. #EngineeringLeadership #PeopleFirst #GrowthMindset