Communicating UX Findings To Non-Technical Teams

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Communicating UX findings to non-technical teams means presenting user experience insights in a way that is clear, impactful, and easy for all stakeholders to understand, regardless of their technical background. The goal is to move beyond technical jargon and ensure research findings are actionable and resonate with diverse audiences.

  • Lead with key outcomes: Start by addressing the critical business implications of your findings, such as reducing costs or improving user satisfaction, to capture attention and showcase impact.
  • Use simple, relatable language: Avoid technical terms and instead explain insights as if you’re having a casual conversation, focusing on clarity and relevance to your audience.
  • Create memorable takeaways: Structure your presentation with visuals, concise conclusions, and repeatable phrases to ensure your findings are understood and retained by the team.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
Image Image Image
  • View profile for Bahareh Jozranjbar, PhD

    UX Researcher @ Perceptual User Experience Lab | Human-AI Interaction Researcher @ University of Arkansas at Little Rock

    8,325 followers

    Telling a compelling story with UX research has nothing to do with flair and everything to do with function, empathy, and influence. One of the most critical yet underappreciated lessons in UX and product work - beautifully articulated in It’s Our Research by Tomer Sharon - is that research doesn’t succeed just because it’s rigorous or well-designed. It succeeds when its insights are heard, understood, remembered, and acted upon. We need to stop treating communication as an afterthought. The way we present research is just as important as the research itself. Storytelling in UX is not decoration - it’s a core deliverable. If your goal is to shape decisions rather than just share findings, the first step is to design your communication with the same care you give your methods. That means understanding the mindset of your stakeholders: what they care about, how they process information, and what pressures they’re facing. Storytelling in this context isn’t about performance - it’s about empathy. The insight must also be portable. It needs to survive the room and be retold accurately across meetings, conversations, and documents. If your findings require lengthy explanations or rely too heavily on charts without clear conclusions, the message will fade. Use strong framing, clear takeaways, and repeatable phrases. Make it memorable. Avoid leading with your process. Stakeholders care far less about your methods than they do about the problems they’re trying to solve. Lead with the tension - what’s broken, what’s at risk, what’s creating friction. Only then show what you learned and what opportunities emerged. Research becomes powerful when it forecasts outcomes, not just reports behaviors. What will it cost the business to ignore this behavior? What might change if we take action? When we can answer these questions, research earns its place at the strategy table. Treat your report like a prototype. Will it be used? Will it help others make decisions? Does it resonate emotionally and strategically? If not, iterate. Use narrative elements, embed user moments, bring in supporting visuals, and structure it in a way that guides action. Finally, stop thinking of the share-out as a one-way street. Facilitate instead of presenting. Invite stakeholders to interpret, ask questions, and explore implications with you. When they co-create meaning, they take ownership-and that leads to real action. Research only creates value when it moves people. Insights are not enough on their own. What matters is the clarity and conviction with which they are communicated.

  • View profile for John Balboa

    Teaching Founders & Designers about UX | Design Lead & AI Developer (15y exp.)

    17,402 followers

    Want to know why UX projects fail? It's not your design skills. After 15 years in design and development, I've watched brilliant designers crash and burn for one reason: 💡 They couldn't communicate their value. How you think UX communication should work: - Present your beautiful mockups - Explain your user research - Show your impressive portfolio - Talk about design principles How UX communication ACTUALLY works: - Translate design decisions into business outcomes - Connect user pain points directly to lost revenue - Provide clear, jargon-free explanations of complex concepts - Build stakeholder trust through consistent delivery 10 years ago, I was designing in a silo. Context? I was the "graphics guy." And no: - I wasn't getting invited to strategy meetings - My designs weren't making it to production intact - Stakeholders didn't understand my value In fact, since I changed my communication approach: - My project implementation rate increased by 85% - I've been invited to leadership meetings - My designs actually shipped as intended Sounds too simple? Here's what worked for me: 1. Ditch the design jargon. Explain concepts like a human talking to another human. 2. Frame everything in terms of business impact. "This navigation change will reduce support tickets by approximately 35%." 3. Build a communication bridge by teaching stakeholders 1-2 UX principles per project. 4. Create before & after comparisons with metrics, not just visuals. 5. Make time to step away from your screen. (For me, it's west coast swing dancing weekly). The perspective shift is worth more than another hour of pixel pushing. The best UX professionals understand that our job isn't just creating great experiences—it's convincing others why those experiences matter. --- PS: What's the most important communication lesson you've learned in your UX career? Follow me, John Balboa. I swear I'm friendly and I won't detach your components.

  • View profile for Ahrom Kim, Ph.D.

    Senior Mixed Methods UX Researcher | Builds Scalable ResearchOps & Insight-to-Impact Pipelines | AI, SaaS, RegTech, EdTech | Dedicated to Aligning Siloed Teams to Drive Product Strategy

    2,553 followers

    Most slide decks put executives to sleep. Here's why this happens and how to fix it: 1. The Research Deep Dive Trap As researchers, we love our methodology. We geek out over sample sizes, confidence intervals, and statistical significance. But executives? They need the "So what?" ✅ Focus on business impact ✅ Lead with key insights ✅ Save the methods for appendices 2. The Story vs. Stats Balance Your fellow researchers want to know: - P-values - Testing protocols - Recruitment criteria Your executives want to know: - Revenue implications - User pain points - Strategic opportunities 3. The Executive-Ready Framework Structure your deck like this: • Key findings (1 slide) • Business impact (1-2 slides) • Recommendations (1-2 slides) • Supporting data (1-2 slides) 4. Keep It Action-Focused Transform this: "We conducted 15 interviews using a semi-structured protocol..." Into this: "Users are abandoning cart 40% more often due to shipping costs" 5. Visualization > Documentation Instead of: - Detailed methodology breakdowns - Complex statistical analyses - Full research protocols Show: - Clear data visualizations - User journey maps - Priority matrices Remember: Your research excellence doesn't come from showing how much you know. It comes from driving decisions that impact the business. The best decks don't just inform. They inspire action. —— 🎯 Tag a researcher who needs this reminder ➕ Follow for more UX research insights 📊 Ready to level up your research impact? Let's connect! #UXResearch #ExecutivePresentation #UserExperience #DataStorytelling

Explore categories