I am a research fellow at the CBS-NTT Program in Physics of Intelligence at Harvard University, leading the phenomenological theory team and often collaborating with Hidenori Tanaka, David Krueger, and Demba Ba. I did my PhD co-affiliated with EECS, University of Michigan and CBS, Harvard, and was advised by Robert Dick and Hidenori Tanaka.
I am generally interested in designing (faithful) abstractions of phenomena relevant to controlling or aligning neural networks. I am also very interested in better understanding training dynamics of neural networks, especially via a statistical physics perspective.
I graduated with a Bachelor's degree in ECE from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee in 2019. My research in undergraduate was primarily focused on embedded systems, such as energy-efficient machine vision systems.
We model ICL in a hierarchical Bayesian framework as a posterior-weighted average of two well-defined algorithmic strategies. Taking a rational analysis lens, we show across three popular setttings, that we can analytically predict model behavior and characterize the algorithmic phase-diagram identified in ICL in our prior work.
We build on results from identifiability theory to formalize a measure that assesses fine-grained differences in a natural distribution and a generative model trained upon it.
We use recent phenomenology of neural network representations, e.g., their ability to encode hierarchical and nonlinear concepts, to argue for the limitations of Linear representation hypothesis, contextualizing SAEs with respect to such concepts.
We demonstrate a duality between how concepts are organized in model representations and the optimal SAE that will help identify them. This implies there exists no universally optimal SAE that can be used across models and domains.
We use vision models to demonstrate algorithmic instability in SAEs, i.e., different runs of the same pipeline yield different features / model interpretations. We propose a geometrical constraint to substantially address this issue.
We demonstrate models can in-context infer novel semantics of a concept, overriding their original meaning based on pretraining. This process occurs relatively rapidly, yielding an emergent reorganization of individual concepts' representations.
We demonstrate an algorithmic phase diagram that decomposes ICL into a mixture of algorithms, showing that phenomenology of ICL may be specific to setups used for experimentation.
We use Formal languages to analyze the limitations of SAEs, finding, similar to prior work in disentangled representation learning, that SAEs find correlational features; explicit biasing is necessary to induce causality.
We implicate rapid acquisition of structures underlying the data generating process as the source of sudden learning of capabilities, and analogize knowledge centric capabilities to the process of graph percolation that undergoes a formal second-order phase transition.
We create a theoretical abstraction of our prior work on compositional generalization and justify the peculiar learning dynamics observed therein, finding there was in fact a quadruple descent embedded therein!
We instantiate a synthetic knowledge graph domain to study how model editing protocols harm broader capabilities, demonstrating all representational organization of different concepts is destroyed under counterfactul edits.
We analyze a model's learning dynamics in "concept space" and identify sudden transitions where the model, when latently intervened, demonstrates a capability, even if input prompting does not show said capability.
We use formal languages as a model system to identify the mechanistic changes induced by safety fine-tuning, and how jailbreaks bypass said mechanisms, verifying our claims on Llama models.
We identify and discuss 18 foundational challenges in assuring the alignment and safety of large language models (LLMs) and pose 200+ concrete research questions.
We formalize and define a notion of composition of primitive capabilities learned via autoregressive modeling by a Transformer, showing the model's capabilities can "explode", i.e., combinatorially increase if it can compose.
We cast stepwise inference methods in LLMs as a graph navigation task, finding a synthetic model is sufficient to explain and identify novel characteristics of such methods.
We show fine-tuning leads to learning of minimal transformations of a pretrained model's capabilities, like a "wrapper", by using procedural tasks defined using Tracr, PCFGs, and TinyStories.
We analyze different LLMs' abilities to model binary sequences generated via different pseduo-random processes, such as a formal automaton, and find that with scale, LLMs are (almost) able to simulate these processes via mere context conditioning.
We analyze compositionality in diffusion models, showing that there is a sudden emergence of this capability if models are allowed sufficient training to learn the relevant primitive capabilities.
We show models that rely on entirely different mechanisms for making their predictions can exhibit mode connectivity, but generally the ones that are mechanistically similar are linearly connected.
We present a highly detailed analysis of the landscape of several self-supervised learning objectives to clarify the role of representational collapse.
We propose an unsupervised learning method that exploits client heterogeneity to enable privacy preserving, SOTA performance unsupervised federated learning.
(Also presented at ICML Workshop on Theory and Foundations of Continual Learning, 2021)
This work demonstrates how quadratic regularization methods for preventing catastrophic forgetting in deep networks rely on a simple heuristic under-the-hood: Interpolation.
An energy-efficient machine vision framework inspired by the concept of Fovea in biological vision. Also see follow-up work presented at CVPR workshop, 2020.